🔥 Love content like this? Don’t forget to hit the like button and 👉 Subscribe (www.youtube.com/@ZebulonTruth) to join our community. If you want to dive deeper into Gurdjieff's enigmatic world, check out our playlist here 👉 th-cam.com/play/PL0l1PFR3YPPEByQUe5qI-qGj3Uur2yPq-.html
lovely video brother, can u please share the name of the documentaries,films where u got the beautiful dancing from...also the amazing music u used. thanks
It is simply the three gunas of Prakriti. Sattva, Rajas and Tamas. It was given in ancient India about 3000-5000 years ago in the vedas and upanishads and subsequently clearly defined by Kapil Muni in Kapil Sutras and about 2000 years back in samkhya karikas by Ishwara Krishna.
Ouspensky told Gurdjieff to beat it and found a spiritual home and base with Swami Shantananda Saraswati who was a student of Swami Brahmananda Saraswati ,Jadguru ,Bhagwan Shankaraachaya of Jyotir Math. Also Maharishi Mahesh yogi's Guru.
Ganz herzlichen Dank🙏fürs Hochladen des schönen Materials. Und danke auch den Autoren der guten Kommentare. Es wurde schon gesagt: Der Vierte Weg führt zur ewigen Frage "Wer bin ich?". Seien Sie etwas tolerant, was die Mittel der verschiedenen "Lehrer/innen" sind, in die Richtung des Geheimnisses zu zeigen. Wer den Zeigefinger genau beschreibt, der auf den Mond zeigt, möchte die Augen schliesslich auf den Mond lenken. Zarathustra machte das anders als Hermes Trismegistos, Buddha machte es anders als Laozi, König Rama anders als Melchisedek, Meister Eckhart als Rumi usw. Das führt zur glücklichen Situation, dass sich jede/r die Methode aussuchen kann, die ihn/sie anspricht und ihm/ihr sympathisch ist. Ich mag zum Beispiel auch den Daoismus / Taoismus mit den beiden Hauptkräften☯️Yin und Yang und der "Weder-noch-Energie", dem Qi / Chi / Ki (Siehe Qi Gong, Thai Chi, Aikido usw.). Wer sich immer wieder auf diese "neutrale Kraft" einstimmt, erreicht schliesslich das Dao / das Tao, den "Urgrund" von allem. Das Besondere an Gurdjieff (und an allen Lehrern / Lehrerinnen der letzten beiden Jahrhunderte) ist nun das (eigentlich sehr erfreuliche!) Umfeld der "Wissenschaftlichkeit". Aber Achtung! Immer, wenn sich wissenschaftliches Denken mit reinem Materialismus paart, bleiben sowohl "Gott", die Liebe oder die "All-Seele", wie auch das "Ich bin", also der Wissenschafter, der die Natur / das Universum betrachtet, ausgeschlossen. Dem "materialistischen Wissenschafter" muss also jeder Lehrer, der den "Zeigefinger" beschreibt, verdächtig vorkommen. Er sieht womöglich das ganze Gelehrtenleben lang kein einziges Mal auf den Mond. Deshalb ist die Methode von Gurdjieff, gerade wegen der vielen originellen Übungen, die er anleitete, so wertvoll. Es ist bei ihm einfach offensichtlich, dass er den Mond meinen musste und nicht den Zeigefinger.
Many thanks🙏for uploading the beautiful material. And thanks also to the authors of the good comments. It has already been said: The Fourth Way leads to the eternal question "Who am I?". Be somewhat tolerant of the means used by the various "teachers" to point in the direction of the mystery. Anyone who accurately describes the index finger pointing to the moon ultimately wants to direct the eyes to the moon. Zarathustra did it differently from Hermes Trismegistos, Buddha did it differently from Laozi, King Rama differently from Melchisedek, Master Eckhart differently from Rumi, etc. This leads to the happy situation that everyone can choose the method that appeals to them and that they like. For example, I also like Daoism / Taoism with the two main powers☯️Yin and Yang and the "neither-nor-energy", the Qi / Chi / Ki (see Qi Gong, Thai Chi, Aikido etc.). Those who repeatedly attune themselves to this "neutral force" ultimately reach the Dao / Tao, the "primordial ground" of everything. The special thing about Gurdjieff (and all teachers of the last two centuries) is the (actually very pleasing!) environment of "scientificity". But beware! --->
(...) Whenever scientific thinking is combined with pure materialism, "God", love or the "All-Soul", as well as the "I am", i.e. the scientist who observes nature/the universe, are excluded. The "materialistic scientist" must therefore be suspicious of any teacher who describes the "index finger". He may not look at the moon once in his entire scholarly life. This is why Gurdjieff's method is so valuable, precisely because of the many original exercises he taught. It is simply obvious that he meant the moon and not the index finger. 🌖 👆
Fariduddin Attar😇beschreibt genau wie Gurdjieff die "dritte Möglichkeit": "Der Weg zum Weinhaus und zur Moschee, welcher ist es? Beides mir Armsel'gem verboten ist es. Einen Weg zwischen Moschee und Weinhaus gibt es. Findet heraus, o ihr Lieben, welcher ist es."
Like Gurdjieff, Fariduddin Attar describes the "third possibility": "The way to the wine house and to the mosque, which is it? Both are forbidden to me poor. There is a way between the mosque and the wine house. Find out, O dear ones, which one it is."
Connection/disconnection, tendencies toward/away, the myriad polarities of emotional complexes - all tied together by a "reconciling" force expressing itself as interfaces between the two extremes. If the universe is built of polarities, we may be the gradients of the pairing constructs or reconciliations within.
@@ZebulonTruth "In search of miraculous" by Ouspensky was probably the most opening eyes book I ever read. Keep up the good work, more people should know for this ingenious men and the Fourth way teachings, especially in this times, when many people are waking up, but they need right knowledge and understanding, thank you for providing that.
Gurdjieff wasn't just a teacher; he was a revolutionary thinker who challenged the way we see ourselves and the world, also showed us that we could awaken to our fullest potential, transcending the ordinary to achieve a higher state of consciousness
I think it’s a bit more complicated than that….. which “you/I” is operating at any time! Uncovering the layers and recognising the variety of public personalities we slip into… Also his exercises in observing and transforming negative emotions into useful energy can be practiced for life (& help us to wake up over and over again). 🙏
Gurdjieff was not a con man at all, and he wasn't acting out of cruelty and arrogance. He knew the weaknesses of the human psyche. The work of his life was aimed at uprooting the causes of these weaknesses for the emergence of Conscience.
He changed the world? He's just another witch using performative witchcraft to seem profound, if you don't think it's witchcraft then why the lesser and greater magic, why the rituals? The silliest thing about these mystics is their lack of substance. They have no answers and posit nothing. Here is what Gurdjieff says "Our aim is to have constantly a sensation of oneself, of one's individuality: this sensation cannot be expressed intellectually, because it is organic. It is something which makes you independent, when you are with other people."...What is the profundity of making people search for individuality and telling people they are asleep? How is this practical? the only thing he posits that is practical is individuation, something I think Carl Jung explained in a much more practical and profound way within his works. He bloviates about these mystical workings of reality and consciousness but says much of nothing. However, there was one man who said much more, and whose teachings can be applied to every human life regardless of status or circumstance, that man was Jesus Christ. Christ Jesus taught to "Love one another", to seek peace, to be helpful even to those who persecute you, to forgive rather than take vengeance, to treat others as you want to be treated, to be humble, do not seek riches as to give in to greed, that there is one greater than us all and if we humble ourselves to that ONE we will gain reward more valuable than any of the perishable assets we can gain on Earth. Grudjieff knew nothing and said nothing at all, he changed nothing but the minds of the witches who are too lost to understand he knew nothing and was a waste of time. There is an entity in this world that is very real and loves to waste people's time, and he is a direct opposer to Christ and his Father.
Philosophy isn't witchcraft. This is just another way of perceiving the world around us, much as Christianity or the Law of One provide perspectives for helping to structure one's own life. The goal is not to be served the wisdom from others, but to discover it upon individual musings. And, for the record, I've known some lovely Wiccans in my time.
@@thokling361 Kindly, when the teaching that I take to heart is met with vicious slander I will take the opportunity to defend it. Opinions can definitely be wrong, simply because not all opinions are equal in value, and that means that some can be discarded as irrelevant to the exercise of critical thinking and impartial evaluation. Gurdjieff was a serious man and his opinions are at least a hundred time more relevant than any philosopher of modern times. You can challenge that claim, but I'd rather have you try to verify that for yourself, if you're so inclined, by reading his writings compiled under the title "All and Everything". Otherwise, if you've never read his books, any opinion you can have about Gurdjieff's teaching is irrelevant. You know what I mean ?
to me a guru is someone who has no addiction to anything. I understand that smoking was very modern in Gurdjef's time, but enlightened people don't do it.
Have you heard about Helena Blavatsky ? She is the most influential occultist of all time and yet she was a chain smoker. But it is also true that at that time, tobacco was not really decried even if it already had a bad reputation in esoteric circles because it lowered the vibratory rate of the etheric body and decreased the sensitivity of the astral body as if it were gradually plunging it into a form of paralysis.
🔥 Love content like this? Don’t forget to hit the like button and 👉 Subscribe (www.youtube.com/@ZebulonTruth) to join our community. If you want to dive deeper into Gurdjieff's enigmatic world, check out our playlist here 👉 th-cam.com/play/PL0l1PFR3YPPEByQUe5qI-qGj3Uur2yPq-.html
lovely video brother, can u please share the name of the documentaries,films where u got the beautiful dancing from...also the amazing music u used. thanks
It is simply the three gunas of Prakriti. Sattva, Rajas and Tamas. It was given in ancient India about 3000-5000 years ago in the vedas and upanishads and subsequently clearly defined by Kapil Muni in Kapil Sutras and about 2000 years back in samkhya karikas by Ishwara Krishna.
Too bad they still havent figured out toilets yet
Ouspensky told Gurdjieff to beat it and found a spiritual home and base with Swami Shantananda Saraswati who was a student of Swami Brahmananda Saraswati ,Jadguru ,Bhagwan Shankaraachaya of Jyotir Math. Also Maharishi Mahesh yogi's Guru.
Thank You Introducing Him and His Works …..Very Uniquely Interesting…..🌞
Ganz herzlichen Dank🙏fürs Hochladen des schönen Materials. Und danke auch den Autoren der guten Kommentare. Es wurde schon gesagt: Der Vierte Weg führt zur ewigen Frage "Wer bin ich?". Seien Sie etwas tolerant, was die Mittel der verschiedenen "Lehrer/innen" sind, in die Richtung des Geheimnisses zu zeigen. Wer den Zeigefinger genau beschreibt, der auf den Mond zeigt, möchte die Augen schliesslich auf den Mond lenken. Zarathustra machte das anders als Hermes Trismegistos, Buddha machte es anders als Laozi, König Rama anders als Melchisedek, Meister Eckhart als Rumi usw.
Das führt zur glücklichen Situation, dass sich jede/r die Methode aussuchen kann, die ihn/sie anspricht und ihm/ihr sympathisch ist. Ich mag zum Beispiel auch den Daoismus / Taoismus mit den beiden Hauptkräften☯️Yin und Yang und der "Weder-noch-Energie", dem Qi / Chi / Ki (Siehe Qi Gong, Thai Chi, Aikido usw.). Wer sich immer wieder auf diese "neutrale Kraft" einstimmt, erreicht schliesslich das Dao / das Tao, den "Urgrund" von allem.
Das Besondere an Gurdjieff (und an allen Lehrern / Lehrerinnen der letzten beiden Jahrhunderte) ist nun das (eigentlich sehr erfreuliche!) Umfeld der "Wissenschaftlichkeit". Aber Achtung! Immer, wenn sich wissenschaftliches Denken mit reinem Materialismus paart, bleiben sowohl "Gott", die Liebe oder die "All-Seele", wie auch das "Ich bin", also der Wissenschafter, der die Natur / das Universum betrachtet, ausgeschlossen. Dem "materialistischen Wissenschafter" muss also jeder Lehrer, der den "Zeigefinger" beschreibt, verdächtig vorkommen. Er sieht womöglich das ganze Gelehrtenleben lang kein einziges Mal auf den Mond.
Deshalb ist die Methode von Gurdjieff, gerade wegen der vielen originellen Übungen, die er anleitete, so wertvoll. Es ist bei ihm einfach offensichtlich, dass er den Mond meinen musste und nicht den Zeigefinger.
Many thanks🙏for uploading the beautiful material. And thanks also to the authors of the good comments. It has already been said: The Fourth Way leads to the eternal question "Who am I?". Be somewhat tolerant of the means used by the various "teachers" to point in the direction of the mystery. Anyone who accurately describes the index finger pointing to the moon ultimately wants to direct the eyes to the moon. Zarathustra did it differently from Hermes Trismegistos, Buddha did it differently from Laozi, King Rama differently from Melchisedek, Master Eckhart differently from Rumi, etc.
This leads to the happy situation that everyone can choose the method that appeals to them and that they like. For example, I also like Daoism / Taoism with the two main powers☯️Yin and Yang and the "neither-nor-energy", the Qi / Chi / Ki (see Qi Gong, Thai Chi, Aikido etc.). Those who repeatedly attune themselves to this "neutral force" ultimately reach the Dao / Tao, the "primordial ground" of everything.
The special thing about Gurdjieff (and all teachers of the last two centuries) is the (actually very pleasing!) environment of "scientificity". But beware! --->
(...) Whenever scientific thinking is combined with pure materialism, "God", love or the "All-Soul", as well as the "I am", i.e. the scientist who observes nature/the universe, are excluded. The "materialistic scientist" must therefore be suspicious of any teacher who describes the "index finger". He may not look at the moon once in his entire scholarly life.
This is why Gurdjieff's method is so valuable, precisely because of the many original exercises he taught. It is simply obvious that he meant the moon and not the index finger.
🌖
👆
Fariduddin Attar😇beschreibt genau wie Gurdjieff die "dritte Möglichkeit":
"Der Weg zum Weinhaus und zur Moschee, welcher ist es?
Beides mir Armsel'gem verboten ist es.
Einen Weg zwischen Moschee und Weinhaus gibt es.
Findet heraus, o ihr Lieben, welcher ist es."
Like Gurdjieff, Fariduddin Attar describes the "third possibility":
"The way to the wine house and to the mosque, which is it?
Both are forbidden to me poor.
There is a way between the mosque and the wine house.
Find out, O dear ones, which one it is."
Thanks for sharing awareness and insights fellow being
Connection/disconnection, tendencies toward/away, the myriad polarities of emotional complexes - all tied together by a "reconciling" force expressing itself as interfaces between the two extremes. If the universe is built of polarities, we may be the gradients of the pairing constructs or reconciliations within.
His Master from, Peshawar Pakistan 🙂
He was the guru of gurus
Next: Law of Seven
🌟 The Law of Seven is next on the horizon
@@ZebulonTruth "In search of miraculous" by Ouspensky was probably the most opening eyes book I ever read.
Keep up the good work, more people should know for this ingenious men and the Fourth way teachings, especially in this times, when many people are waking up, but they need right knowledge and understanding, thank you for providing that.
I will try my best about the law of seven after 1 video . I'll promise
The fourth way pls
As I promised 👉 th-cam.com/video/oJJKQ9-zPFA/w-d-xo.html
Gurdjieff wasn't just a teacher; he was a revolutionary thinker who challenged the way we see ourselves and the world, also showed us that we could awaken to our fullest potential, transcending the ordinary to achieve a higher state of consciousness
If you really study Gurjieff, you realize his real message is very simple - just remember who you are.
@@carolwillmont7424 I finished this video with that words ❤️
The challenge is the individual figuring out who they are in the first place.
I think it’s a bit more complicated than that….. which “you/I” is operating at any time! Uncovering the layers and recognising the variety of public personalities we slip into… Also his exercises in observing and transforming negative emotions into useful energy can be practiced for life (& help us to wake up over and over again). 🙏
👍👍👍👍👍👍
It seems that he spent a great amount of time getting in and out of automobiles. Perhaps that is when he received his greatest inspirations.
😂 just another con man...
And that's OK.
Gurdjieff was not a con man at all, and he wasn't acting out of cruelty and arrogance. He knew the weaknesses of the human psyche. The work of his life was aimed at uprooting the causes of these weaknesses for the emergence of Conscience.
@@sinda7080 nah. a con man. every sogn of it. used his charisma to build a sect.
He was a con artist, but an interesting one.. 🤣🤣
He changed the world? He's just another witch using performative witchcraft to seem profound, if you don't think it's witchcraft then why the lesser and greater magic, why the rituals? The silliest thing about these mystics is their lack of substance. They have no answers and posit nothing. Here is what Gurdjieff says "Our aim is to have constantly a sensation of oneself, of one's individuality: this sensation cannot be expressed intellectually, because it is organic. It is something which makes you independent, when you are with other people."...What is the profundity of making people search for individuality and telling people they are asleep? How is this practical? the only thing he posits that is practical is individuation, something I think Carl Jung explained in a much more practical and profound way within his works. He bloviates about these mystical workings of reality and consciousness but says much of nothing. However, there was one man who said much more, and whose teachings can be applied to every human life regardless of status or circumstance, that man was Jesus Christ. Christ Jesus taught to "Love one another", to seek peace, to be helpful even to those who persecute you, to forgive rather than take vengeance, to treat others as you want to be treated, to be humble, do not seek riches as to give in to greed, that there is one greater than us all and if we humble ourselves to that ONE we will gain reward more valuable than any of the perishable assets we can gain on Earth. Grudjieff knew nothing and said nothing at all, he changed nothing but the minds of the witches who are too lost to understand he knew nothing and was a waste of time. There is an entity in this world that is very real and loves to waste people's time, and he is a direct opposer to Christ and his Father.
Philosophy isn't witchcraft. This is just another way of perceiving the world around us, much as Christianity or the Law of One provide perspectives for helping to structure one's own life.
The goal is not to be served the wisdom from others, but to discover it upon individual musings.
And, for the record, I've known some lovely Wiccans in my time.
Perfect comment. Anyone who disagree is still lost.
Gurdjieff never spitted on Christianity. You are wrong for opposing his teaching in such shameless manner.
@@sinda7080 Opinions are never wrong, but they are also not objective facts so much as subjective truths.
@@thokling361 Kindly, when the teaching that I take to heart is met with vicious slander I will take the opportunity to defend it.
Opinions can definitely be wrong, simply because not all opinions are equal in value, and that means that some can be discarded as irrelevant to the exercise of critical thinking and impartial evaluation.
Gurdjieff was a serious man and his opinions are at least a hundred time more relevant than any philosopher of modern times. You can challenge that claim, but I'd rather have you try to verify that for yourself, if you're so inclined, by reading his writings compiled under the title "All and Everything". Otherwise, if you've never read his books, any opinion you can have about Gurdjieff's teaching is irrelevant. You know what I mean ?
Luciferianism
No, Gurdjieff taught the contrary of hedonism and egoism.
Try another guess, maybe you get it right next time.
@@sinda7080 hedonism is for the lower classes.
to me a guru is someone who has no addiction to anything. I understand that smoking was very modern in Gurdjef's time, but enlightened people don't do it.
Have you heard about Helena Blavatsky ? She is the most influential occultist of all time and yet she was a chain smoker.
But it is also true that at that time, tobacco was not really decried even if it already had a bad reputation in esoteric circles because it lowered the vibratory rate of the etheric body and decreased the sensitivity of the astral body as if it were gradually plunging it into a form of paralysis.
Just another guru.
He was the real one