Hiten Shelar, Bestselling Author of Astrophysics for Non-mathematcians here. I am really impressed by your work. And value you are putting. Full support from my side!
Sir i wanna ask can you recommend some book to me for the maths of astrophysics.. I have done some mathematics books like riley, Hobson mathematical physics but i started learning post graduate Astrophysics textbook i found that the mathematics in the book is quite unfamiliar to me.. So can you recommend some specially mathematics book for astrophysics... It will be very helpful sir...
@@Bitastro Well, in case of understanding the gravitational physics and relativity I can suggest one. The Book Gravitation by Kip Thorne, Charles Misner and John Wheeler is an amazing Gravitational Astrophysics Textbook. It contains two sections, one that uses ordinary complex Astrophysics maths and other introduces with new mathematical tools methods like exterior calculus to bring the things easier and better. While not knowing the exact book that is made for Astrophysics Maths, the Gravitation Book may certainly satisfy your curiosity even if you have not very much grip at the complex maths. But still a good grip over calculus is required. I hope you find this helpful.
I have a concept about How we see things In traditional way think two light is coming from a source . generally we say the brain backwards the light virtually and find their meeting point and there forms a image. If I thought about this concept with the help of biology .then it is not true I hope you know the structure of human eyes. firstly The light entered in cornea then refracted by eye convex lens then it is focused on retina. An inverted image is formed on the retina. but the brain straight the image . If we were to "backtrack" the light rays from the retina, the image would not form at the actual location of the object in the real world. The object and image positions would indeed be different. am i right?????????????????????????? Then how we see things??
Bro In traditional way think two light is coming from a source . generally we say the brain backwards the light virtually and find their meeting point and there forms a image. If it is right we don't see objects. The images are placed on the object by our human brain 🧠. Is it right??
Mathematical insights into Symmetry is coming soon...
Hiten Shelar, Bestselling Author of Astrophysics for Non-mathematcians here. I am really impressed by your work. And value you are putting. Full support from my side!
@@AstrophysicsShortVideos thanks professor Hiten . I glad you liked it.. one day i also wanna be a astrophysicist...
Sir i wanna ask can you recommend some book to me for the maths of astrophysics.. I have done some mathematics books like riley, Hobson mathematical physics but i started learning post graduate Astrophysics textbook i found that the mathematics in the book is quite unfamiliar to me..
So can you recommend some specially mathematics book for astrophysics...
It will be very helpful sir...
@@Bitastro Well, in case of understanding the gravitational physics and relativity I can suggest one. The Book Gravitation by Kip Thorne, Charles Misner and John Wheeler is an amazing Gravitational Astrophysics Textbook. It contains two sections, one that uses ordinary complex Astrophysics maths and other introduces with new mathematical tools methods like exterior calculus to bring the things easier and better. While not knowing the exact book that is made for Astrophysics Maths, the Gravitation Book may certainly satisfy your curiosity even if you have not very much grip at the complex maths. But still a good grip over calculus is required.
I hope you find this helpful.
Ok sir i will surely try ..
Correction:not under line its understand
Listen again carefully and next time add the time stamp where you find mistakes...
I have a concept about How we see things
In traditional way think two light is coming from a source .
generally we say the brain backwards the light virtually and find their meeting point and there forms a image.
If I thought about this concept with the help of biology .then it is not true
I hope you know the structure of human eyes. firstly The light entered in cornea then refracted by eye convex lens then it is focused on retina. An inverted image is formed on the retina. but the brain straight the image . If we were to "backtrack" the light rays from the retina, the image would not form at the actual location of the object in the real world. The object and image positions would indeed be different.
am i right??????????????????????????
Then how we see things??
I don't thing i ever try to understand the diagram of eye.. But i will answer it when i will study it..
Bro
In traditional way think two light is coming from a source .
generally we say the brain backwards the light virtually and find their meeting point and there forms a image.
If it is right we don't see objects. The images are placed on the object by our human brain 🧠.
Is it right??