ChatGPT 101

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 14

  • @uctv
    @uctv  ปีที่แล้ว

    Check out "Dark Persuasion - The History of Brainwashing from Pavlov to Social Media" here: th-cam.com/video/bWl8FXhdEio/w-d-xo.html

  • @PCMenten
    @PCMenten ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cathy Wood differs about LLMs, saying that training that used to cost millions now can be done for thousands and that trend shall continue.

  • @metaphysicalArtist
    @metaphysicalArtist ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ChatGPT 3.5 free today: Please keep in mind that these assessments are approximate and subjective, as they are based on the data I have been trained on rather than individual language proficiency tests. Here's a rough estimate of my proficiency in the languages:
    English: Very high proficiency
    Spanish: High proficiency
    French: High proficiency
    German: High proficiency
    Italian: High proficiency
    Portuguese: High proficiency
    Dutch: Moderate to high proficiency
    Russian: Moderate to high proficiency
    Chinese (Simplified and Traditional): Moderate to high proficiency
    Japanese: Moderate to high proficiency
    Korean: Moderate to high proficiency
    Arabic: Moderate to high proficiency
    Turkish: Moderate to high proficiency
    Swedish: Moderate proficiency
    Polish: Moderate proficiency
    Danish: Moderate proficiency
    Norwegian: Moderate proficiency
    Finnish: Moderate proficiency
    Greek: Moderate proficiency
    Hebrew: Moderate proficiency
    Hindi: Moderate proficiency
    Bengali: Moderate proficiency
    Indonesian: Moderate proficiency
    Thai: Moderate proficiency
    Vietnamese: Moderate proficiency
    Czech: Moderate proficiency
    Hungarian: Moderate proficiency
    Romanian: Moderate proficiency
    Ukrainian: Moderate proficiency
    Catalan: Moderate proficiency
    Filipino (Tagalog): Moderate proficiency
    Malay: Moderate proficiency
    Persian (Farsi): Moderate proficiency
    Slovak: Low to moderate proficiency
    Slovenian: Low to moderate proficiency
    Croatian: Low to moderate proficiency
    Serbian: Low to moderate proficiency
    Bulgarian: Low to moderate proficiency
    Lithuanian: Low to moderate proficiency
    Latvian: Low to moderate proficiency
    Estonian: Low to moderate proficiency
    Icelandic: Low to moderate proficiency
    Swahili: Low proficiency
    Tamil: Low proficiency
    Telugu: Low proficiency
    Malayalam: Low proficiency
    Kannada: Low proficiency
    Marathi: Low proficiency
    Gujarati: Low proficiency
    Punjabi: Low proficiency
    Welsh: Low proficiency
    Irish (Gaelic): Low proficiency
    Scottish Gaelic: Low proficiency
    Basque: Low proficiency
    Galician: Low proficiency
    Albanian: Low proficiency
    Maltese: Low proficiency
    Yiddish: Low proficiency
    Armenian: Low proficiency
    Georgian: Low proficiency
    Macedonian: Low proficiency
    Bosnian: Low proficiency
    Kurdish: Low proficiency
    Amharic: Low proficiency
    Somali: Low proficiency
    Hausa: Low proficiency
    Zulu: Low proficiency
    Xhosa: Low proficiency
    Sesotho (Southern Sotho): Low proficiency
    Swazi: Low proficiency
    Tswana: Low proficiency
    Afrikaans: Low proficiency
    Xitsonga: Low proficiency
    Oromo: Low proficiency
    Lingala: Low proficiency
    Luganda: Low proficiency
    Malagasy: Low proficiency
    Uzbek: Low proficiency
    Kazakh: Low proficiency
    Pashto: Low proficiency
    Nepali: Low proficiency
    Sinhala: Low proficiency
    Bengali (Bangla): Low proficiency
    Gujarati: Low proficiency
    Kannada: Low proficiency
    Telugu: Low proficiency
    Odia: Low proficiency
    Assamese: Low proficiency
    Maithili: Low proficiency
    Sindhi: Low proficiency
    Burmese: Low proficiency
    Khmer: Low proficiency
    Lao: Low proficiency
    Tibetan: Low proficiency
    Dzongkha: Low proficiency
    Maldivian (Dhivehi): Low proficiency
    Sundanese: Low proficiency
    Javanese: Low proficiency
    Tagalog: Low proficiency
    Hawaiian: Low proficiency

  • @gerardtrigo380
    @gerardtrigo380 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    There is the problem that ChatGPT lies. There are a number of cases where students have asked ChatGPT to write a paper using references. They will get a well written paper with totally bogus references.

    • @RobVollat
      @RobVollat ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You still have to use your own personal intelligence and craftiness as to HOW you use it, like with most tools. Although they do claim GPT version 4 corrects this issue by a huge margin, in the range removing 95%+ of outright falsehoods that gpt 3 suffers from - as you rightly state.
      The insane part is they’re already testing GPT 4 code meaning it’s live on their internal servers already and it’s only been a few months since the last release version launched 😮
      If said student uses it to create a paper and then simply fact checks it with the assistance of Google search, that route is far “easier” than having to manually study the material and then conceptualize a paper on any said topic or subject.

    • @beaulah_califa9867
      @beaulah_califa9867 ปีที่แล้ว

      so it's like a human being. lies and all. let me know when ai beings a holocaust or genocide or lets me people starve to death and sleep outside. oh, humans got that covered.

    • @gerardtrigo380
      @gerardtrigo380 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RobVollat I think using ChatGPT to write your papers is a form of cheating. Some method of checking for this is needed.

    • @ThomasBaxterSoutar
      @ThomasBaxterSoutar 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dont humans around you lie too? How do you detect their lies? Probably not using AI? ;) x

  • @bhowmikubkv
    @bhowmikubkv ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative

  • @ThomasBaxterSoutar
    @ThomasBaxterSoutar 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Left to Right...Terabytes...seconds (time)...teacher ...creativity is maybe only human quantum (on our planet anyway?)

  • @AvinashTavares
    @AvinashTavares ปีที่แล้ว

    i tried the last test. It said "The sentence "This is a real test of artificial intelligence." has 8 words."

    • @unprofesorenlared1723
      @unprofesorenlared1723 ปีที่แล้ว

      When you get that answer, ask it again with the full stop.

  • @icherishcrochetandknit309
    @icherishcrochetandknit309 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I belong to the artistic world of the web and I have seen renditions by Chat that were nowhere near interpreting a crochet pattern, a dance routine, etc... and to date, tjhere are only knittiing machines. MAN cannot achieve producing and manufacturing a crocheting machine. Will Chat be able to design one?