Thomas Sowell: Federal Reserve a 'Cancer'

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ส.ค. 2024
  • Complete video at: fora.tv/2010/12/14/Uncommon_Kn...
    Economist Thomas Sowell explains why he supports Ron Paul's stance on abolishing the Federal Reserve. When asked by Peter Robinson what should replace the Fed, Sowell replies: "When someone removes a cancer, what do you replace it with?"
    -----
    Thomas Sowell has studied and taught economics, intellectual history, and social policy at institutions that include Cornell University, UCLA, and Amherst College. Now a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Sowell has published more than a dozen books, the latest of which is a revised and updated edition of his classic volume, Basic Economics.
    "Through its various editions," Sowell writes, "the fundamental idea behind Basic Economics remains the same: Learning economics should be as uncomplicated as it is informative."
    Here, Sowell seeks to uncomplicate some of the economic issues confronting the country today, from the financial crisis and the role of the Fed to the economics of health care and trade imbalances. - Hoover Institution
    Thomas Sowell is an American economist, political writer, and commentator. He is currently a senior fellow of the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. In 1990, he won the Francis Boyer Award, presented by the American Enterprise Institute. In 2002 he was awarded the National Humanities Medal for prolific scholarship melding history, economics, and political science.
    Peter M. Robinson is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, where he writes about business and politics, edits Hoover's quarterly journal, the Hoover Digest, and hosts Hoover's television program, Uncommon Knowledge.

ความคิดเห็น • 605

  • @praisekek4487
    @praisekek4487 5 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    the problem with government is government

    • @plushtown29
      @plushtown29 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The problem with government is bribery.

  • @stratocaster1986able
    @stratocaster1986able 9 ปีที่แล้ว +249

    Sowell gets it.

  • @MeteorMega
    @MeteorMega 5 ปีที่แล้ว +125

    Ron Paul spent a lot of time on Congress trying to end the FED and got nowhere. When is someone going to get it?

    • @nasisimi1
      @nasisimi1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      The Fed will eventually collapse on its own when there is no more road to kick the can down.

    • @kimobrien.
      @kimobrien. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@nasisimi1 In other words a collapse of world capitalism. Workers control of industry. NOW!!

    • @pokerkramer1240
      @pokerkramer1240 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@nasisimi1 How do you say that after 2008? the guys ended the world economy and no one from the elite responsible for that was arrested! They are above the law.

    • @pokerkramer1240
      @pokerkramer1240 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@kimobrien. get the fuck out of here you duty commie

    • @cheesemccheese5780
      @cheesemccheese5780 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pokerkramer1240 lmao. What did he say?

  • @pearleycunningham
    @pearleycunningham 3 ปีที่แล้ว +160

    “When someone removes a cancer, what do you replace it with?”
    Brilliant answer to anyone who asks, “Well what will we do if we get rid of (insert gov’t department of choice)?”

    • @adiintel1
      @adiintel1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Smaller banks that must use full fractional banking. Instead of reserves?

    • @jackbrady9738
      @jackbrady9738 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@adiintel1 good point. Maybe smaller banks should have like 30% reserve rate instead of 10%

    • @dcirish1213
      @dcirish1213 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The federal reserve is private corporation. Just goes to show how ill informed people are lol

    • @pearleycunningham
      @pearleycunningham 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@dcirish1213 lol yes we all know it’s technically private but it’s an instrument of the government literally created by federal legislation…

    • @jackbrady9738
      @jackbrady9738 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@dcirish1213 it's technically a private corporation but in all aspects under the Act that ggives it power it's public

  • @catherinebourdon8258
    @catherinebourdon8258 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    "When someone removes a cancer, what do you replace it with?" *Not another form of cancer* This is why I love Sowell

  • @joeb6544
    @joeb6544 5 ปีที่แล้ว +145

    Mr. Sowell is a brilliant, informed, educated, intelligent, articulate individual!!!

    • @CP9Des
      @CP9Des 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      A modern day philosopher I’d add too!

    • @Patricia-sn9ln
      @Patricia-sn9ln หลายเดือนก่อน

      A Gentleman
      And A
      Schollar.

  • @olanordmann7836
    @olanordmann7836 9 ปีที่แล้ว +440

    I can't see how people can make this so complicated; End the Fed (end every other central bank in the world), and let's move back to gold and silver.

    • @shakkamannaka6618
      @shakkamannaka6618 8 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      +Ola Nordmann there are several problems with having the gold standard, that you don't have with a fiat currency:
      1) It takes a lot of resources to extract and transport the gold, resources that might have been allocated more efficiently elsewhere in the economy. This was a point that was famously argued by Milton Friedman against the gold standard.
      2) While it is true that inflation over very long periods of time have been lower and more stable on the gold standard, inflation/deflation on a year to year basis was much higher and volatile, which caused many unnecessary banking failures (due to deflation), and reduced efficiency in the economy (due to rampant inflation).
      3) Interest rates on the gold standard tend to run contrary to the rates that are most beneficial to the economy during economic cyclicals (interest rates were higher during downturns, and lower during booms effectively exacerbating the cyclicals)
      4) The currency would be subject to speculative attacks against its value (Which was why Britain among others had to leave the gold standard in the early 30s)

    • @shakkamannaka6618
      @shakkamannaka6618 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Ola Nordmann btw jeg er norsk jeg å

    • @olanordmann7836
      @olanordmann7836 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      shakka mannaka God dag!
      Et år sinden jeg skrev den komentaren, så har endret meningene mine litt.
      I stedet for å avskaffe sentralbanken, bør vi avskaffe Staten.

    • @shakkamannaka6618
      @shakkamannaka6618 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hei. Det var en et enda større hopp. Hvis du ikke skjønte det så skrev jeg kommentaren i forsvar til sentralbanken, fordi jeg mener den er en netto-positiv bidragsyter til næringslivet. Jeg synes også det er en dårlig idè å avskaffe staten, grunnet at studier antyder at det vil resultere i underinvesteringer av grunnleggende goder som god infrastruktur, forsvar og beskyttelse mot markedsrelaterte eksternaliteter. Hvis du har lest "Basic Economics" av Sowell, så anerkjenner til og med han nytteverdien av å ha en sterk stat. Man kan i midlertidig ha en diskusjon om størrelsen og rekkevidde til staten

    • @olanordmann7836
      @olanordmann7836 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      shakka mannaka Staten har ingen penger. De 4 ordene summerer argumentet for kapitalisme; Staten kan ikke bruke mer penger enn det Staten stjeler fra den private sektoren. Staten kan trykke, låne eller rane, men den kan ikke produsere noe som helst.
      Markedet har ingen problemer med å produsere biler, tog og fly, så hva får deg til å tro at markedet ikke kan produsere vei?
      Hva burde min straff være vis jeg nekter å bruke kroner?
      Jeg mener ikke vi bør innføre gull-standard, jeg mener vi bør oppheve "tvungen betalingsmiddel"-loven, og la markedet bestemme fritt, hva som skal være penger.
      Jeg personlig stemmer gull og sølv.

  • @StreetFighter2010
    @StreetFighter2010 11 ปีที่แล้ว +114

    I have just discovered this man, and now I can't get enough of listening to him.

  • @EKwisnek
    @EKwisnek 12 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    It's these statements that confirm Sowell as one of our great minds in modern times.

  • @John-zh6ld
    @John-zh6ld 5 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Thomas delivers again. No value in the Fed doing the Treasury job.

  • @aveyowyns
    @aveyowyns 11 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Guns is a trivial issue?
    The right to arms is written into the U.S. constitution. The Federal Reserve and how we use/protect/issue out our currency is not.

  • @davidkidd2644
    @davidkidd2644 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Guys like Sowell and Paul give me hope in America.

  • @thinbev
    @thinbev 13 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    It should be noted that our economy has grown IN SPITE of the Fed and not "because" of the Fed.

  • @Jalilvideogeek93
    @Jalilvideogeek93 10 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    "When someone removes a cancer, what do you replace it with" EPIC QUOTE

  • @billdoell1868
    @billdoell1868 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Yes, End the Fed.

  • @turtlelovingzombie
    @turtlelovingzombie 10 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    The Fed should be ended a long time ago. Thomas Sowell states it well as he does. He is more than a perfect rolemodel for the black community. He inspires me and i would vote him president over any of the latest presidents in the us. I am not a American nor am i black.. just a humanitarian thats all

    • @charlieivey6506
      @charlieivey6506 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Brilliant man...so sad our so called black leaders belittle him.

  • @mercen144
    @mercen144 13 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    "when someone removes a cancer what do you replace it with" - Priceless

  • @bigtay522
    @bigtay522 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    It's almost as if having a streamlined machine for manufacturing debt would create slavery.

    • @life_of_riley88
      @life_of_riley88 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      H-ha! Perfectly stated. That is what American workers are staring down the barrel of currently. Their energy or the value of their lives, their work is being devalued to support endless debt. It's cycle that cannot be outrun without high risk speculation. We all know how that ends. . .when Americans are pushed further and further out the risk curve, collapse is inevitable.

  • @shiftymg3590
    @shiftymg3590 5 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Man I love this guy!!

  • @TheManiacalSatanist6
    @TheManiacalSatanist6 11 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    My respect for Thomas Sowell just increased by a factor of 10.

  • @anticommunistOAC
    @anticommunistOAC 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    That last remark is why Sowell is one of the greatest

  • @jbgant8513
    @jbgant8513 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Thomas sowell is a National Treasure.

  • @juancarlosfigueroasolis2464
    @juancarlosfigueroasolis2464 5 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    The federal reserve is about as federal as federal express (fedex)
    It’s not
    It’s a private corporation

    • @user-ri4jx2lp7x
      @user-ri4jx2lp7x 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What private corporation has that kind of power?

    • @DocOrtmeyer
      @DocOrtmeyer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@user-ri4jx2lp7x the Illuminati ;)

    • @austinbyrd4164
      @austinbyrd4164 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No, the dollar is a government monopoly, the fed was established through government, answers to congress, has all of its officials appointed by government, & always gives them the money they want no matter the detriment. It's not private. If you sincerely think so, then you're a dumb@ss.

    • @life_of_riley88
      @life_of_riley88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@austinbyrd4164 No no no. The Federal Reserve Note is what you mean. The dollar can ONLY be minted and issued by Congress. You've been duped and you won't admit it. You need to do some studying and learning on who really controls the FED, it's not our government. They are a private corporation and they issue their own currency, and it's not American dollars, it's says right on it "Federal Reserve Note".

    • @austinbyrd4164
      @austinbyrd4164 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Life_of_Riley The federal reserve literally has its people chosen by the government, answers to the government, was created by government, & its currency is monopolized by the government. It's a semi independent government organization.

  • @layahma
    @layahma 13 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    "When someone removes a cancer, what do you replace it with?"
    Massive amount of debt from treatment and medication.

    • @find_pain
      @find_pain 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      so what let it fucking kill us?

    • @JavedAnsari-sc3pd
      @JavedAnsari-sc3pd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Decentralised crypto currency.

  • @mtstatehk14090914
    @mtstatehk14090914 10 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Nice to see the Chicago School coming around against the fed

    • @gabbar51ngh
      @gabbar51ngh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Milton Friedman wanted to abolish the fed in his last years

  • @givetheymeantake
    @givetheymeantake 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really like both of these men. Mentors for thought and conversation.

  • @JaredJosephHoag
    @JaredJosephHoag 12 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    People, this video only has 18,496 views as of the time of this writing. I implore you to spread this around as much as possible. Every thinking/voting person in the United States of America needs to hear this man speak, and speak clearly.

  • @lcotee
    @lcotee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm watching this in 2022 and its even more relevant!!! Steven Zarlenga has passed sadly but his book Lost Science of Money " is available for free online. Approximately 750 pages of well documented history and facts. He was part of the American Monetary Institute.

  • @jameseldridge3445
    @jameseldridge3445 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Helping those who can't help themselves always hurts the country as a whole. But people value sympathy/emotion over logic, that is why politicians use this to help boost the idea of a centralized system. Ludwig von Mises and Thomas Sowell have many writings on this phenomenon

    • @Nekrumorfiini1
      @Nekrumorfiini1 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Most people are just like animals, they just need to fulfill their basic desires and feel good about themselves and they're happy, they don't want to know the truth nor do they care about reality. The government is happy to give them what they want.

    • @jameseldridge3445
      @jameseldridge3445 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Nekrumorfiini1 couldn’t have been said better

  • @koolkamel322
    @koolkamel322 12 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    "If the gov't had taken the bailout money, and given it every person in America, each person would have obtained an estimated $3,000. Instead, we gave it to the banks to prevent a recession that came shortly after anyway." - Dr. Ron Paul
    How can you read that and still say libertarians are crazy?

    • @eddarby469
      @eddarby469 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think libertarians are short sighted for other reasons. If I understand their policies, they want us to be isolationist. That would lead to another World War in short order. I don't think that would be good for the average US citizen.

  • @nasisimi1
    @nasisimi1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Founding Fathers knew about the problems fiat money. That is why Gold and Silver are only allowed to be used as money under The Constitution. The Gold Standard is the best thing for regular working class people.

  • @YumegakaMurakumo
    @YumegakaMurakumo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love him so much! 💜 Thomas Sowell is such a classy elegant man.

  • @KAZVorpal
    @KAZVorpal 13 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love what he says on this, except his evasion of the question of what to replace it with.
    If we disbanded the Fed without actively replacing it, that would leave Congress controlling the printing of our fiat currency. This would be a disaster, leading to actual hyperinflation, as it printed however much money it wanted.

  • @lauradahlus
    @lauradahlus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    God bless this intelligent man! 🙏

  • @vibratehigher2441
    @vibratehigher2441 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @eelvevets
    @eelvevets 12 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love this man's intelligence and candor.

  • @ask_why000
    @ask_why000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They had so many warnings.

  • @laborwage
    @laborwage 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @MatsKaarbo I just looked into the Venus Project. I would like to ask you a question; if not for the price system, which system will allocate scarce resources that have alternative uses?

  • @Theimpromptulife
    @Theimpromptulife ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant man love hearing him.

  • @JanRiffler
    @JanRiffler 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant.

  • @absolutroot
    @absolutroot 13 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    OMG greatest quote ever at the end. Someone write that down... nevermind, i will do it, to make sure it gets done :D

  • @cankorgbr
    @cankorgbr 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent

  • @gaozhi2007
    @gaozhi2007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But when I remove this shackle from my leg, what do I replace it with?
    FREEDOM.

  • @fecklessman
    @fecklessman 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    'i have to say, i wasn't expecting your answer to run in this direction, so i don't have questions - follow up questions - prepared, and i may have to actually think here in real time!'
    lol. at least he's honest about it.

  • @thaegypti
    @thaegypti 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Any one watching this in 2022 to understand the main issue with the USA financial system 🇺🇸 ?
    This man knows toooooo much real info's 😳

    • @sowitsky
      @sowitsky ปีที่แล้ว

      Absolutely

  • @Southparkateer2
    @Southparkateer2 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great metaphor.

  • @laborwage
    @laborwage 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @MatsKaarbo Your English is just fine. My confusion is with HOW the resource based economy can allocate scarce resources which have alternative uses. How does such an economy deal with knowledge? That is, how is it that resources go to one time and place in a certain quantity or quality? How are resource demands communicated, and how are these demands weighed against alternative demands for the same resources elsewhere in the economy?

  • @oiuoiu988
    @oiuoiu988 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @Livefreerevolution
    the tally stick was backed by the implicit use of force, it was not just an idea.

  • @chaseorosco9017
    @chaseorosco9017 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That last line was a zinger. Yes!

  • @joepeeler34
    @joepeeler34 13 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    @CaptainCocaine This is big news. Many consrvative don't read Austiran economists, but hey do read Sowell. Sowell is the major intellectual to most conservatives. This can only help the cause immensely. Sowell is one of the few non-Austrians that I read regularly.

  • @Firehorse40
    @Firehorse40 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The FED is privately owned. It is unconstitutional, and it is not likely to be dissolved without a great deal of effort.

  • @DkleinD
    @DkleinD 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @oiuoiu988 I meant if you really think you have a good answer to the problem keep educating people about it. Thats what I meant by keep doing what you are doing. This is my last response. THank you for your comments. Peace and love.

  • @DkleinD
    @DkleinD 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You can do nothing and there are still more than enough people, like myself, to fill in the gap that technology cannot. If you open your eyes you will not be disappointed! Love you!

  • @oiuoiu988
    @oiuoiu988 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @MrResilire
    he wasnt the first to say that about the fed, i cant remember where right now but ive heard it about the fed many times before.

  • @laborwage
    @laborwage 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @MatsKaarbo Hmmmm.... when you say "we have and what we can use," who do you mean?

  • @TS175
    @TS175 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sweet...very sweet!

  • @leftofcollegestation
    @leftofcollegestation 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    What do you replace it will is a legitimate questions. What do would you use to regulate the money supply?

  • @ilenekuhns3463
    @ilenekuhns3463 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amen!

  • @88spammer
    @88spammer 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @koolkamel322 I am a huge Ron Paul fan and also an Australian.In the time of the GFC we also had a slight bailout(which i don't agree with) and it was partly given to the people, we received a $900 check in the mail from K Rudd.Given that we are doing reasonably well (in certain aspects), we are still 1.4 Trillion in debt and worse than before the GFC.Point being that, that money was ours to begin with but the debt wasn't, so how could've and did it work? I believe the best way would have been

  • @sniped101
    @sniped101 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow.. thats amazing

  • @dreamingWisdom
    @dreamingWisdom 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Volker was the best Federal Reserve chairman in the last 60 years. He didn't make the mistake of putting too much money in the system as Greenspan did.

  • @ByronicLuke
    @ByronicLuke 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm honestly looking to understand; not criticize the good, Dr. Sowell. What does he mean? To not have currency at all? Barter? Or does me mean a finite currency of dollars?

    • @4191good1
      @4191good1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The Treasury can do it again and if the current Presidents Treasurer is doing a poor job put pressure on the President to replace them or replace the Administration the next time the term comes up. Central Banks historically were on 5, 10, 20 or 25 year contracts, not this perpetual BS like the Fed.

  • @ghxstleader485
    @ghxstleader485 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    beautiful line I'm stealing it When someone removes a cancer what do you replace it with?

  • @brianbailey7128
    @brianbailey7128 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Boy does this ring true in Oct 2021.

  • @oiuoiu988
    @oiuoiu988 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @zayadnay
    thats a non-sequitur, i never said we should switch to gold. its also idiotic because the amount of money in circulation has no correlation with actual economic growth, just gdp.

  • @JensHove
    @JensHove 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Cancer, spot on!

  • @BrianValddreifing
    @BrianValddreifing ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He was great! Go Austrian School of Economics!

  • @doglegjake6788
    @doglegjake6788 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's time for a change NOW

  • @sniped101
    @sniped101 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    damn... thats a good one.

  • @sp1ke0kill3r
    @sp1ke0kill3r 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    @ ByronicLuke I didn't hear Sowell say anything about no currency. He did say something about no gold standard, but he also described that as a different set of arguments. Finally, perhaps the question is less about what would you replace the fed with and more about what is likely to replace the Fed. Are we likely to see the statusQuo ante or more likely to see congress take a stab @ it? The governments solution invariably seems to amount to adding another layer of bureaucracy. Will we see a department of Economy wide security?

  • @oiuoiu988
    @oiuoiu988 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @DkleinD
    yes, and the most efficient way of making sure all life on earth is maintained in a healthy balance is the complex web of VOLUNTARY interaction that emerges when each individual actor in society pursuing his or her individual self-interest, we dont have to plan how to ration resources when exchange and interaction are VOLUNTARY! i'm not upset at all, and if you really loved me you would research the theory of marginal utility.

  • @oiuoiu988
    @oiuoiu988 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @JebBlack2010
    thank you for getting it right!!! we dont need to end the fed at all if we can repeal legal tender laws.

  • @freesk8
    @freesk8 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yay, Thomas Sowell!!!

  • @sniped101
    @sniped101 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    what do you place it with?

  • @ponrix
    @ponrix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great interviewer. Smart and can ask questions off the cuff.

  • @ananiasacts
    @ananiasacts 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @AquaticApe1, so we carry around bags of flour? They never actually explain how "wealth" works in that video. I couldn't figure out how the accounting works.

  • @barttfisher
    @barttfisher 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s amazing really. We have a financial crisis, caused by greedy, reckless financial institutions. Congress passes legislation requiring those institutions to be less greedy and reckless. The institutions then lobby to have those restrictions removed, usually in the name of “remaining competitive”. This leads to another financial crisis. It’s completely predictable, and we have been doing this dance since the Great Depression almost 100 years ago.

    • @PennyBergeron-os4ch
      @PennyBergeron-os4ch 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agree; the rules should be applicable to all banks - big or small. First; very few meaningful laws are passed and then this cycle of doing-undoing seems to support deregulation risking the economy and the faith in banks.

    • @FinnBraylon
      @FinnBraylon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A lot of folks downplay the role of advlsors until being burnt by their own emotions. I remember couple summers back, after my lengthy divorce, I needed a good boost to help my business stay afloat, hence I researched for licensed advisors and came across someone of utmost qualifications. She's helped grow my reserve notwithstanding inflation, from $275k to $850k.

    • @HildaBennet
      @HildaBennet 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, I've been researching advisors lately because the market news I've been seeing hasn't been that positive. Who is the individual who helped you, and is he or she still around?

    • @FinnBraylon
      @FinnBraylon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I work with Sonya Lee Mitchell as my fiduciary advisor. Simply look up the name. You would discover the information you needed to schedule an appointment.

    • @HildaBennet
      @HildaBennet 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I just looked her up on the web and I would say she really has an impressive background in investing. I will write her an email shortly.

  • @oiuoiu988
    @oiuoiu988 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    all that needs to be done is to repeal legal tender laws to allow for competing exchange media, let the fed AND treasury compete too if they wish. federal reserve notes, treasury notes, private bank notes, foriegn currencies and whatever else people wish to use as exchange media can compete. who knows, maybe some people will even choose to accept/use actual specie as exchange media again.

  • @laborwage
    @laborwage 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @MatsKaarbo Unfortunately it does not sound like a science at all. Attempting to quantify resource quantity without integrating extraction costs is 1.) Not a good idea from the perspective of eventual allocation and 2.) Is a process that requires continuous recalculation, even if extraction costs are integrated.
    Also, why do this with one computer system if you can do it with millions, as is done today? Can one computer possibly do all the calculations that millions can do?

  • @ryanmurphy2588
    @ryanmurphy2588 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mr. Sowell is brilliant and knows that whatever that you replace one system with you gotta work hard to replace it with another. That will take some time. The Federal reserve is a cancer tho, and needs to be replaced as quickly as possible. It all takes time tho.

  • @Whoo711
    @Whoo711 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    late after the stock market crash and bank runs. They held to a VERY STRICT "sound money" approach, and because of that, THEY HAD NO WIGGLE ROOM in terms of fixing the money supply to DEAL W/ THE PROBLEMS, nor did they do much about ENSURING THAT BANKS AND DESPOSITORS WERE SAFE. Because there was HARDLY any fractional-reserve banking, loads of banks HAD ONLY ENOUGH FOR SOME DEPOSITORS (whatever was in the vault), and they ran out. Now, with fractional-reserve banking AND deposit insurance

  • @xBlake4
    @xBlake4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The solution isn't gold and silver - both markets are subject to heavy manipulation. The solution is to let the Treasury issue debt-free notes. Simply restore the money making power to the government. There's no rational justification for having this power vested in private hands, especially the hands of bankers.

  • @laborwage
    @laborwage 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @MatsKaarbo Yes, but who designs the machines? Could they not be corrupt and keep the better machines for themselves? And stationary machines cannot accomplish even a small percentile of the work necessary in a complex economy. If you want machines to accomplish such feats as you ask of them, you need to give them motivations and intelligences. How could unintelligent machines possibly put a dent into the resource allocation problem?

  • @SaltyFloridian
    @SaltyFloridian 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @tacitus7 WELL SAID!!

  • @karlwolff3292
    @karlwolff3292 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A very good comeback. What do you replace cancer with?

  • @21Million
    @21Million ปีที่แล้ว

    Instead of the FED, simply implement a "100% reserve requirement banking system" !!!! "The Need Act" tried to fix this (in 2011) but did not pass. (see Wikipedia for info)

  • @Visfen
    @Visfen 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @kaioshy lol, no, it's not.

  • @EriPages
    @EriPages 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    LOL@the last line...the journalist felt silly by the end of this video.
    Thomas Sowell, you are a respectable individual.

  • @laborwage
    @laborwage 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @MatsKaarbo So he hasn't built anything that allocates resources yet? And thank you, I will check out the videos.

  • @laborwage
    @laborwage 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @MatsKaarbo "If you have all the necessities you need in life and it is the technology that allows you to sustain that life style, would you really mess that up?"
    OF COURSE!!!! People have a complex human nature, and selfish ambitions are a big part of it. People are survival machines for replicators, both genetic and memetic. Given the opportunity and sufficient time, people grab as much power as they can. No society has ever escaped this.

  • @oiuoiu988
    @oiuoiu988 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @kaxitaksi
    no thank you.

  • @alahjandrodagrate1611
    @alahjandrodagrate1611 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You replace it with whatever commodity the market demands. It’s been gold for thousands of years and will likely to continue being gold and silver, but if another commodity serves as a better money, then the market will inevitably shift to that money. Hopefully bitcoin will be in the mix.

  • @oiuoiu988
    @oiuoiu988 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @DkleinD
    read hayek's 12 page essay, the intellectuals and socialism. or economic calculation in the socialist commonwealth(about 10 pages) by ludwig von mises for a better understanding

  • @TruthisWITHIN
    @TruthisWITHIN 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel if you end the federal reserves right now, those who own majority of the land and gold will control EVERYTHING. The complete financial system will need to be replaced, I agree with Mr Sowell on nearly everything. But on this topic, I’m not sure if he’s completely correct.

  • @valjoseph3395
    @valjoseph3395 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u mr sowell

  • @oiuoiu988
    @oiuoiu988 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @leftofcollegestation
    voluntary human interaction. thats why you dont need to replace it with anything. the money supply is best regulated by millions of humans interacting voluntarily. if different types of money were allowed to compete one might emerge as the new money or we might use many different kinds. humans deciding to use this money or that money would regulate exchange rates between the different exchange media.

  • @Brantoc
    @Brantoc 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Everyone says 'Gold Standard' as if that is the only option. Surely there is an alternative that meets certain basic requirements, one of which is it be a closed system to prevent rampant inflation, and money printing. That doesn't mean tied to Gold or another commodity that can be exploited.
    I'd say something tied to GDP or a multiple there of, but that can also be exploited. Surely there is another answer.

  • @bigglilwayne7050
    @bigglilwayne7050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The biggest heist in the history of mankind resulted in the Federal Reserve

  • @cmbradford
    @cmbradford 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's interesting that the interviewer did not expect Sowell's answer.

  • @spongessuck1
    @spongessuck1 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @zayadnay The price of gold will just reflect its scarcity- it doesn't matter how much there is in the end.
    If we don't want economy-wide price fluctuations, we must keep the money supply stable, and that is what a commodity standard does, such as a gold standard. With fiat money, i.e. dollars, there is no limit to how many can be circulated, and with a government constantly in debt, it is in their best interest to promote inflation, which reduces real debt but punishes savers and investors.