The Biggest Numbers in the World Size Comparison

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ค. 2020
  • What's the largest number you can imagine? Trillions of trillions? If you're not a professional mathematician and not some cool physicist, the answer is probably approximate. And could we visualize this number? Nope, we're not going to write out all of those zeros on paper. I suggest having a look at a device that shows the total number of atoms in the universe. And even surpasses it. I agree, this doesn't sound very realistic. But such a mechanism does exist, and I managed to find it.
    #eldddir #eldddir_space #numbers #space

ความคิดเห็น • 6K

  • @aexzaea4741
    @aexzaea4741 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10349

    "No matter How large a number is, It is still closer to 0 than to infinity"

    • @hassanalihusseini1717
      @hassanalihusseini1717 3 ปีที่แล้ว +478

      Yes, exactly! Nearly all natural numbers are bigger. Anyway I find it more difficult to understand Graham's number, TREE(3) or others than infinity. Strange....

    • @hypercoder-gaming
      @hypercoder-gaming 3 ปีที่แล้ว +154

      Not ending a quote annoys my SO MUCH

    • @josh-brawlstars2870
      @josh-brawlstars2870 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      Aeronn Charles Camza no, 9 going on forever is the largest number therefore it’s closer to infinity

    • @DaGraveCrowder
      @DaGraveCrowder 3 ปีที่แล้ว +270

      Remember that infinity isn't a number, just a symbol representing the theoretical idea of a never-ending set of something. It's possible that everything is finite, even time itself.

    • @maddygrabham136
      @maddygrabham136 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Hassan Ali Husseini same here

  • @danielbruin
    @danielbruin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5808

    Even if I could spin the first gear at the speed of light. It still won't even come close to turning the last gear. :)

    • @2mjz84
      @2mjz84 3 ปีที่แล้ว +172

      It has to eventually :D

    • @chandlerstevens4498
      @chandlerstevens4498 3 ปีที่แล้ว +645

      Turn the wheel from the other side

    • @saemstunes
      @saemstunes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +114

      @@chandlerstevens4498 undermined reply

    • @poulomi__hari
      @poulomi__hari 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Omg thats really you?

    • @poulomi__hari
      @poulomi__hari 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Wow... what is the farthest you have been

  • @fgwp
    @fgwp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +124

    A quintillion is pretty easy to imagine in the real-life scale.
    Imagine a small cube with an edge of one millimeter.
    Then imagine a cube with a one kilometer edge.
    There is one quintillion millimeter-cubes in a single kilometer-cube.

    • @robertmichel8456
      @robertmichel8456 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Wouldn’t that be 1 million?

    • @thenonfurry
      @thenonfurry ปีที่แล้ว +4

      interesting

    • @Mcdonalds-Cheeseburger
      @Mcdonalds-Cheeseburger ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@robertmichel8456 Cubic Metrics grow faster,

    • @solifa1
      @solifa1 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@robertmichel8456 That’s what I though until I found something. See, cubic meters grow 3 times as fast as regular meters.
      1 km = 10^6 mm
      1 squared km = 10^12 squared mm
      1 cubic km = 10^18 cubic mm
      Here, he is talking about cubic km and cubic mm, so the correct equation is the third one. Thank you for understanding.

    • @badpiggs
      @badpiggs 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Mcdonalds-Cheeseburger nice comma instead of period. it makes total sense to swap them like we are doing,

  • @Jaspal05
    @Jaspal05 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Robots in 10,000 years: counting every atom in the universe

  • @thingsforpaul
    @thingsforpaul 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1246

    Me, an intellectual: *infinity*
    Vsauce: **starts explaining why i’m wrong**

    • @aprogamer6857
      @aprogamer6857 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Lol

    • @notplatypustheperry9179
      @notplatypustheperry9179 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Hey! Vsauce, Michale here

    • @thingsforpaul
      @thingsforpaul 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Kian Saliany you are are right but it is a meme, yes omega is the biggest number, i know that, i’m not stupid like you’d like to think

    • @thingsforpaul
      @thingsforpaul 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Zack Max alif null is an example

    • @j.p.blanks4552
      @j.p.blanks4552 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You guys are such nerds^Googol

  • @erwinruff01
    @erwinruff01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5331

    Has he tried spinning the mechanism from the other side? Imagine how fast the first wheel would spin xD

    • @trunzlerclement3227
      @trunzlerclement3227 3 ปีที่แล้ว +914

      So fast it will break space time and reality in it's entirety will vanish... Literally the destroyer of the universe

    • @trunzlerclement3227
      @trunzlerclement3227 3 ปีที่แล้ว +212

      But I am pretty sure it is just unisense spin

    • @trunzlerclement3227
      @trunzlerclement3227 3 ปีที่แล้ว +110

      @Sentience100 erwinruff meant to spin the last gear instead of the first. That's a good question 😊

    • @arturbeqiri3882
      @arturbeqiri3882 3 ปีที่แล้ว +544

      It needs an unimaginable force

    • @thedefdefdef
      @thedefdefdef 3 ปีที่แล้ว +89

      U need all the energy in a black hole to do this.

  • @Enddeous
    @Enddeous ปีที่แล้ว +227

    Fun fact about Googolplex: If you were to write it out, each and every zero, you would run out of space. Even if you had the superpower to write a zero on every atom in the observable universe, you would still run out of space, as googolplex has 10^100 zeroes, but there are only about 10^80 atoms in the entire observable universe.

    • @goldycolors6982
      @goldycolors6982 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Wow

    • @skierx
      @skierx ปีที่แล้ว

      notice how it is only observable. what about the undiscovered ? the mass that gets sucked in by a black hole?

    • @Enddeous
      @Enddeous ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@skierx Oh true

    • @maartenvandermeulen2643
      @maartenvandermeulen2643 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      You would need to write a 0 on every atom of 10^20 observable universes to write out googolplex.

    • @Lianotube
      @Lianotube ปีที่แล้ว

      shut up dude

  • @Mr_Mooseman
    @Mr_Mooseman ปีที่แล้ว +141

    I love how mathematicians are always competing to see who can think of the number with the most zeros

    • @silksonic3927
      @silksonic3927 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      agustin rayo already won i think

    • @43617
      @43617 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I made a number eeeeion

    • @larryslemp9698
      @larryslemp9698 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's really so much more than 'that.'

    • @tom-lord
      @tom-lord 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@silksonic3927 Rayo's number is more of a thought experiment. Nobody has a clue how the number is actually constructed, let alone what any of its digits are.

    • @VoidWalker_Expired
      @VoidWalker_Expired 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Search up Centillion

  • @ossifyn3221
    @ossifyn3221 3 ปีที่แล้ว +817

    The thumbnail is horrifyingly out of scale

    • @sonnyswint3034
      @sonnyswint3034 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      The one and only ikr

    • @elvingabrillo8487
      @elvingabrillo8487 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      last one is mrbeast's money

    • @darian2975
      @darian2975 3 ปีที่แล้ว +98

      Yeah graham's number isn't that 'small'

    • @TerryZhuang
      @TerryZhuang 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Yeah, u can only fit 10 to the power of 184 plank size object in the whole universe and a Graham’s number is way bigger than a googol

    • @Tadcoco
      @Tadcoco 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      saranqxv googol is 10 to the 100th and but Graham’s number is so much big that difference doesn’t even matter at its scale

  • @velpex6695
    @velpex6695 3 ปีที่แล้ว +216

    Was expecting him to start with “This is Arnold”

    • @johngeronimo8821
      @johngeronimo8821 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same hahaa

    • @zaidalvi8774
      @zaidalvi8774 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too Vrlplex

    • @chibi_okami
      @chibi_okami 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wait- Are they the same narator?

    • @saabyrth
      @saabyrth 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chibi_okami look at the subscription

    • @saabyrth
      @saabyrth 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chibi_okami but if it wasnt there its on the description

  • @Farzriyaz
    @Farzriyaz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    According to my calculations, even 1 googol quectometers minus the speed of light is still a positive number, which means rotating the 100th gear on the mechanism is faster than the speed of light.

  • @andy-ty5ph
    @andy-ty5ph 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Who needs to go to college and rack up student loans when you have wonderful videos like this to educate and enlighten! Love it!!!

  • @ShynohEclipse
    @ShynohEclipse 3 ปีที่แล้ว +626

    You can only put a comma if you have 3 digits coming after it. The fact that you end with one zero irritates me.

    • @theix1622
      @theix1622 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Comment until it reaches to a googol

    • @clickmaestro595
      @clickmaestro595 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      Extreme Demon Kill him

    • @ash_the_guy2007
      @ash_the_guy2007 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@clickmaestro595 o.o

    • @imkriss8301
      @imkriss8301 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Id do this, 100.000.000.000,00

    • @alvargd6771
      @alvargd6771 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Extreme Demon make him do that many attempts on ya
      Also my friend says miliseconds ans hundrenths of seconds are the same lol

  • @harrypotalonzo
    @harrypotalonzo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +699

    Skips the number "Sextillion" , Cause- yes.

    • @Fantastinobel
      @Fantastinobel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      ölölöööl

    • @bhaistang4627
      @bhaistang4627 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Oh uhhhh... XD yeah cuz it has the word sex in it

    • @nibsin
      @nibsin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      He's such a noob

    • @nibsin
      @nibsin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@shanghim680 I'm sorry what

    • @shanghim680
      @shanghim680 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@nibsin noob

  • @willbagthegreat
    @willbagthegreat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    As a cuber I was waiting for you to mention the 43 quintillion scrambles on the Rubik's Cube

  • @kysroul
    @kysroul ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I like how he skipped 10^21 😂

  • @MrSkeelton
    @MrSkeelton 3 ปีที่แล้ว +647

    I'm irritated that he doesn't describe the largest number.

    • @josh-brawlstars2870
      @josh-brawlstars2870 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Zahay Bone the largest number is 9 going on forever

    • @mercer9534
      @mercer9534 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      th-cam.com/video/e0xJwdcpATM/w-d-xo.html

    • @SamiDoustdar
      @SamiDoustdar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Graham’s number isn’t the largest number, the largest number with a non Semantic explanation is rayos number

    • @diegodelacruz1372
      @diegodelacruz1372 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Number is infinite. There are no exact highest number ever

    • @josh-brawlstars2870
      @josh-brawlstars2870 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Sean Arcade Dela cruz yes there is, the largest one digit number is 9, numbers larger than 9 are made up of other one digit numbers, 247 for example there’s a 2 a 4 and a 7. So if you use 9 and say 9 goes on forever, this would be the largest number, since 9 is the largest one digit number.

  • @johannesvanderhorst9778
    @johannesvanderhorst9778 3 ปีที่แล้ว +591

    Unfortunately, this video doesn't explain what Graham's Number is. Fortunately, I can try. I start with some simple calculations most people should understand.
    3+3 = 6
    3*3 = 3+(3+3) = 9
    3^3 = 3*(3*3) = 27
    Now it becomes more complicated. The pattern above can be continued, but instead of the power notation one could also notate these numbers with upward arrows, but I will notate it with just "|".
    3|3 = 3^3 = 3*(3*3) = 27
    3||3 = 3|(3|3) = 3^3^3 = 7,625,597,484,987. Here this number can be expressed as a "tower" of three exponentials.
    3|||3 = 3||(3||3) = 3^3^...^3, a tower of 3||3 exponentials, on which the first calculation has to be done at the top of the tower.
    3||||3 = 3|||(3|||3), a number so gigantic it will just be expressed as "G1".
    To reach Graham's number this way it will still take a while. So I will skip some steps, but note that each time, we still keep the formula 3|||... (n 'arrows') ...|||3 = 3|||... (n-1 'arrows') ...|||(3|||... (n-1 'arrows') ...|||3). Until now we have yet reached n = 4 this way.
    3|||... (4 'arrows') ...|||3 = G1
    3|||... (G1 'arrows') ...|||3 = G2
    3|||... (G2 'arrows') ...|||3 = G3
    ...
    3|||... (G63 'arrows') ...|||3 = G64 = Graham's number

    • @Tafkadasoh78
      @Tafkadasoh78 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      Very compact explanation! :)

    • @HollUpWhat
      @HollUpWhat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Your genius

    • @insanegamer3696
      @insanegamer3696 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Ctrl + c ctrl + v
      Easy!

    • @ooreho
      @ooreho 3 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      i don’t know what you said but it’s amazing

    • @tristandhin227
      @tristandhin227 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Well explained!

  • @SogehtMathe
    @SogehtMathe ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video with a great visualisation!

  • @helenareedus
    @helenareedus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +636

    Biggest numbers in the world:
    My student loan: am I a joke to you?

    • @golbox4
      @golbox4 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      My knowledge:am i a Joke to you both?

    • @SpaceIsAwesome0358
      @SpaceIsAwesome0358 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@golbox4
      yes

    • @golbox4
      @golbox4 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SpaceIsAwesome0358 then your wrong
      Idk If this was a Joke but i laughed

    • @SpaceIsAwesome0358
      @SpaceIsAwesome0358 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@golbox4
      the comment is indeed a joke

    • @Ho_Tuyen
      @Ho_Tuyen 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@golbox4 me who knows there are secert numbers bigger than infinity:my knowledge is beyond infinity.

  • @RhiannonDQ
    @RhiannonDQ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +860

    So you’re telling me there are more possible game states in chess than there is atoms in the known universe

  • @GuitarNerd-f7b
    @GuitarNerd-f7b 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bro explained an entire science and/or a math class in 10 minutes

  • @jefersonfaria7862
    @jefersonfaria7862 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely fantastic. An amazing visual companion

  • @WalidFeghali
    @WalidFeghali 2 ปีที่แล้ว +757

    9:02 You're saying 10^94 books weigh as much as the Milky Way, when known atoms in the universe are 10^78. What am I missing here? They should weigh many magnitudes higher than all of the universe.

    • @saucysalamis9894
      @saucysalamis9894 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Yeah but there are objects in the Milky Way that are very small and very heavy such as neutron stars, and also we have at least 1 supermassive black hole which has a massive mass but relative to there mass don’t have atoms

    • @WalidFeghali
      @WalidFeghali 2 ปีที่แล้ว +162

      @@saucysalamis9894 If you have more books than atoms in the universe, the books must weigh way more.

    • @saucysalamis9894
      @saucysalamis9894 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@WalidFeghali well the books were being used as a comparison they didn’t mean it literally, I could say the milky green at weighs 10^10^1000 cockroaches, I’m not saying there is that many

    • @WalidFeghali
      @WalidFeghali 2 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      There is 10^53 kg observable mass in the universe. All those books weigh more than 10^93 kg. I think they wrote it wrong in the video.

    • @jeffli071
      @jeffli071 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Because weight isn’t the same as volume

  • @JTS1576
    @JTS1576 3 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    4:44
    That zero placement disappoints me for some reason.

    • @mrafabrizi
      @mrafabrizi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s because a googol is 10^100. 100 isn’t a multiple of 3, so a googol comes out to 10 duotrigintillion.

    • @JTS1576
      @JTS1576 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@mrafabrizi I know that, it’s just that it’s positioned like this: 1,000,0
      And not like this: 10,000

    • @philjones5519
      @philjones5519 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's cause it's wrong the commas go after every 3 numbers from the beginning of the number (at the very right side)

    • @Mcdonalds-Cheeseburger
      @Mcdonalds-Cheeseburger 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JTS1576 Well,
      Your a Perfectionist

    • @rankoss3437
      @rankoss3437 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mrafabrizi a googol is far bigger than a duotrigintillion

  • @bluewolffps1410
    @bluewolffps1410 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That really got me with that thumb nail 😂😂

  • @mistermiss9093
    @mistermiss9093 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "think of the biggest number you know"
    me: nondecilion,
    the dude: probably trillions of trillions
    me: smiles in what i learned from *cookie clicker*

  • @denrick6283
    @denrick6283 3 ปีที่แล้ว +649

    “No one can count upto billion”
    Senku: Am i joke to you?

    • @ohhimarx1471
      @ohhimarx1471 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Dude really counted to over 96 billion seconds

    • @terminusfinity009
      @terminusfinity009 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@ohhimarx1471 count to 10³⁰³ (that's a centillion bty)

    • @raineanthonyvillafuerte1291
      @raineanthonyvillafuerte1291 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      He had 3000 years no one can live that long

    • @BRAVETOASTA
      @BRAVETOASTA 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Conziltillion

    • @BRAVETOASTA
      @BRAVETOASTA 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@raineanthonyvillafuerte1291 1 billion seconds is 30+ years dumbhead

  • @ryansatoshi7932
    @ryansatoshi7932 3 ปีที่แล้ว +246

    Riddle: Gogol
    Me as an Intellectual: Ten Duotrigintillion

    • @TheBestOfSweden
      @TheBestOfSweden 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Me: One quintredecillion times a octononagintanongentillion

    • @wfow1448
      @wfow1448 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I thought a Googol was Ten Duotrigintillion?

    • @ryansatoshi7932
      @ryansatoshi7932 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@wfow1448 sorry my mistake

    • @wfow1448
      @wfow1448 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Ballyliffin Bros Not that I'm aware.

    • @theix1622
      @theix1622 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Uhhhhh how about a Beyond infinity googolplex Numwes X 999999999
      It's beyond infinity its googol times bigger than infinity but its not the biggest number, a creator's number is bigger it would be almost infinite amount of seconds for you to write it all in one book but of course its inpossible because our sun will be a red giant and kill us all before that.

  • @OctoBirb8Claws
    @OctoBirb8Claws 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    something about the thumbnail: i calculated 2^1026 dollar thicknesses (2^1024 millimeters is much much less than graham's number) into light-years, and the amount of light-years was more than the amount of planck lengths in the universe.

  • @GreenHillSonic_Roblox
    @GreenHillSonic_Roblox ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "The biggest numbers in the world"
    Ah yes. I forgot that galaxies were on earth.

  • @hereLiesThisTroper
    @hereLiesThisTroper 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Chuck Norris counted to infinity, TWICE!

    • @shurik3nz346
      @shurik3nz346 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pfft I did it thrice

    • @poodle5421
      @poodle5421 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shurik3nz346 chuck norris?

    • @sebyg0466
      @sebyg0466 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao

    • @TheAgamemnon911
      @TheAgamemnon911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And he did it backwards the second time.

    • @stromboli183
      @stromboli183 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheAgamemnon911 lol I love that 😄

  • @corygrell6340
    @corygrell6340 3 ปีที่แล้ว +275

    You didn't even define Graham's Number.
    Now that we have specifically defined all of these things and given concrete examples of them in the universe, here is a term that is bigger with no definition, no comprehension, and no context. End of video.

    • @welcometoreality437
      @welcometoreality437 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Haha! It's still not even close to Rayo's Number.

    • @Paralativ
      @Paralativ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      What's about TREE(3) and the SSCG-function?

    • @billmanbillman7894
      @billmanbillman7894 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ҉ Paralativ i was just thinking this, grahams number, being as uncomprehensively large as it is, is miniscule in comparison to TREE(3)

    • @welcometoreality437
      @welcometoreality437 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@billmanbillman7894 There's many more larger numbers than TREE(3). Rayo's number would be F(n) = The least number that cannot be uniquely described by an expression of first-order set theory that contains no more than n symbols. Rayo's number is then just F(10^100) though, we can still go even further with G(n) such that G(n) grows more quickly than F(n).
      At the end, these numbers still remain within the finite realm, once you leave you'll face with multiple infinities. The smallest infinity being Aleph 0, followed by Aleph 1, Aleph 2, Aleph 3...

    • @marnotto8269
      @marnotto8269 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@welcometoreality437 if you use functions to define big numbers, it just gets boring... The point of TREE(3) and Graham's number is that they define really cool concepts, and are used in mathematical theories. TREE(3) describes the number of nodes you can build in a tree of 3 different nodes, and graham's number describes huge numbers of dimensions and vertecies (I'm not a mathematician, I just watch numberphile, so don't believe what I'm saying do the research)

  • @Miki7z
    @Miki7z ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The numbers are created in latin, with some additions to it.
    Like Unus, Duo, Tres, quattuor, quinque. Which are
    Undecillion, Duo decillion, Tredecillion, Quatturodecillion, Quindecillion (or something like that)
    The "Decillion" also comes from latin which stands for 10.
    Quindecillion means 5 + 10 = 15. If you want the number of zeroes of that number (in american numbers)
    You multiply X (which is 15 in this scenario) by 3 and then you add another 3 which is 48.
    But in my country you would multiply X by 6. Which would mean that Quindecillion has 90 zeroes where i live.

  • @AMan-xz7tx
    @AMan-xz7tx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    Graham’s number in US dollars: you can’t defeat me
    The observable universe: I know, but he can
    *the US healthcare system

    • @dylanmcadam8509
      @dylanmcadam8509 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Grahams number in us dollars would actually be much much much bigger than the observable universe

    • @lefishe7431
      @lefishe7431 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fr

    • @thecreatorvd3854
      @thecreatorvd3854 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      after this final boss unlocked the real infinite universe

    • @Firefly256
      @Firefly256 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dylanmcadam8509 that’s exactly why the universe can’t beat graham number

  • @mamedvaifov2460
    @mamedvaifov2460 3 ปีที่แล้ว +133

    Imagine knowing this when u were a kids . Arguments who is more stupid would have interesting results. Like “ no ur stupid Grahams number times!” “ noooo ur stupid Grahams number plus 1!”

    • @rishi91
      @rishi91 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      but we knew infinity That was our Ultimate superpower 😂

    • @johannesvanderhorst9778
      @johannesvanderhorst9778 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rishi91 That didn't work in my youth. My sister said "I always have 1 more."

    • @BoibbleicecubebfdiMrexist
      @BoibbleicecubebfdiMrexist 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I’m literally a kid I’m about to watch this video at 10 years old

    • @amberthecinderacee836
      @amberthecinderacee836 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm a kid, and seeing this brightens my day, knowing an adult doesn't know what a multillion is, yet I, a 10-yr-old, do... yeet

    • @rishi91
      @rishi91 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@amberthecinderacee836 who said that a adult doesn't know bout multitrillion

  • @phillipmarques8403
    @phillipmarques8403 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    so insane to see how these people go in to their channel. What an amazing TH-cam video, goddamn.

  • @andrewbloom7694
    @andrewbloom7694 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That thumbnail definitely isn't to scale, since even if each dollar was a plank length long it would be larger than the universe lol

  • @GregJoughin
    @GregJoughin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +195

    It really, REALLY bugs me that the "thousand-separator" commas are in the wrong places every time the googol is shown on screen.

    • @dumdum_plays
      @dumdum_plays 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I have a bigger number 1googolplexen it's 100googols to make Googleplexen

    • @Prefusify
      @Prefusify 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dumdum_plays a bigger number, the countable infinity

    • @sergejcvetkovic9805
      @sergejcvetkovic9805 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Do you have OCD or something?

    • @petterlarsson7257
      @petterlarsson7257 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dumdum_plays YOUR GRAMMAR AND SPELLING IS INCREDIBLE

    • @petterlarsson7257
      @petterlarsson7257 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dumdum_plays also 100 googol doesnt do anything

  • @andysmith2160
    @andysmith2160 3 ปีที่แล้ว +158

    If you counted to 1 million, your lips wouldn’t touch until you said “1 million”

    • @TheRealAndian
      @TheRealAndian 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Oh God you're right...

    • @valentinopopa1686
      @valentinopopa1686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Damn son

    • @guya1018
      @guya1018 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Wrong. Say one without touching your lips

    • @TheRealAndian
      @TheRealAndian 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@guya1018 h-how are you pronouncing "one"??

    • @PauIieWalnuts
      @PauIieWalnuts 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Wrong.

  • @ryanthebeast6013
    @ryanthebeast6013 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    he skipped sextillion LOL

  • @leatherneptune6631
    @leatherneptune6631 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I loved watching this video and pretending I knew exactly what was going on.

  • @joepiazza3756
    @joepiazza3756 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I love how the commas are off and the last 0 is on it's own.

  • @ringoferrer2343
    @ringoferrer2343 3 ปีที่แล้ว +195

    Just to take into context how big Graham's number really is:
    (this is knots up arrow notation (just assume the lines in between the 3s are arrow ups))
    3|3= 27
    3||3=7.6Trillion
    3|||3= really big number
    3||||3= G1
    3||||...|[G1 no of arrows] 3 = G2
    3||||...|[G2 no of arrows] 3= G3
    .
    .
    .
    G64= Grahams number

    • @maharshi9999
      @maharshi9999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      well G65 is bigger than that.

    • @CharNatorn
      @CharNatorn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Gstack

    • @Srontgorrth
      @Srontgorrth 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Tree3 laughs about that

    • @andrewzhang8512
      @andrewzhang8512 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Srontgorrth SCG(13) hehe

    • @Lokomasloko76
      @Lokomasloko76 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@andrewzhang8512
      Rayo's number:
      JAJAJAJA (laughing in Mexican)

  • @WheresYourMotivationAt
    @WheresYourMotivationAt 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    every wheat grain in a chess board except each square doubles the wheat grains.

  • @rippedtorn2310
    @rippedtorn2310 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    When you've been dead for a Googolplex years ...you haven't even started .

  • @giornogiovanna2299
    @giornogiovanna2299 3 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Googol: You can't defeat me!
    Quadrillion: I know, but he can..
    Googol Plex: *PERISH, YOU MORTAL*

  • @glowstickqueen7139
    @glowstickqueen7139 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    1:37 "1 THICC book"

  • @happyclub4972
    @happyclub4972 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your logo is really sick bro

  • @lordwipes376
    @lordwipes376 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Him: no one can think of the largest number
    Him later: this is the largest number
    Me then: does not under stand
    Me later: Types a 8 then turns it 90 degrees

  • @pleasuretokill
    @pleasuretokill 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    The opening graphic pic is so incredibly understated isnt funny. Grahams Number is so much larger than the size of our observable universe that if you could write each digit small enough to fit on an atom, you would run out of atoms in the universe to simply write the number out....by a lot. Like, the number that you did get by writing all 9s on every single atom in the universe wouldn't even come close to G1 and there's 64 layers in Grahams Number.

    • @sakshamsinghal5418
      @sakshamsinghal5418 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I think so cuz G1=3^7625597484987 when you put it in a calculator it just says infinity

    • @pleasuretokill
      @pleasuretokill 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sakshamsinghal5418 I'll put it to ya this way. Take 3^^^3. Not even G1, the step before it. 3, three arrows, 3.... is three to the power of 3... 7.6 TRILLION times! To count from 1 to 1 trillion if you were to say a number every second would take you 31,700 years. So, to count to 7.6 trillion at one number a second would take approximately 240,000 years or about as many years as man has been on planet Earth. Now.... imagine if it were possible to do the math of 3 to the power of 3 1 time, every second for 240,000 years. After just one day, the number would be so incredibly huge you wouldn't have room to write it down anywhere in your house.
      Now do that for a year. At that point you would likely run out of room in the universe as 3 to the power of itself compounds very quickly. Now, a century, then finally 240,000 years. 3^^^3, the number before G1 is so astronomically huge that your mind literally cannot comprehend it.

    • @sakshamsinghal5418
      @sakshamsinghal5418 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pleasuretokill wait I thought 3arrow3=27.
      3arrowarrow3=19683
      3arrowarrowarrow3=7625597484987
      G1=3^7625597484987

    • @pleasuretokill
      @pleasuretokill 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sakshamsinghal5418 No. 3^3 is 27. 3^^3 is 7.6 Trillion. 3^^^3 is a tower of 3's stacked on itself 7.6 Trillion times. You would have to write 3 to the power of itself until you reached the sun. That's how high the tower of 3s would stack if you wrote a normal 3 like you would on a piece of paper. 3^^^^3 is 3^^^3, 7.6 Trillion times. The number that you get from 3^^^^3 is the number of arrows in G1. (sorry, I kept writing 3.7 trillion, I have no idea why, probably too many 3s...lol. It's 7.6 Trillion.)

    • @LC19.
      @LC19. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sakshamsinghal5418 you mean 3↑↑4 but G1 is = 3↑↑↑↑3

  • @lennoxschmup8733
    @lennoxschmup8733 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    2:17 ''its unlikely anyone chould count to a billion,its almost 32 years
    me: *counts to a billion in less then 10 seconds*
    ''you understemate my power''

    • @golbox4
      @golbox4 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same

    • @DB-xv3kz
      @DB-xv3kz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      1,2, imma skip a few, 1,000,000,000
      boom that was easy.

    • @petterlarsson7257
      @petterlarsson7257 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ottffssentettffssent

    • @petterlarsson7257
      @petterlarsson7257 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thats 1 to 20 super fast

    • @Idk-tb9kq
      @Idk-tb9kq 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Teach me your ways

  • @chiupapimunianio3473
    @chiupapimunianio3473 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    6:12 non of supermassive black hole have equal mass to galaxies, it doesn't even have 2% of galaxy mass.

    • @cabbageboi6365
      @cabbageboi6365 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ummmm
      There's a black hole named TON 618 and has a mass of 66,000,000,000 suns. The third largest galaxy in our galactic local group (the triangulum galaxy) has a mass of 50,000,000,000 suns. The amount of matter needed to make that black hole is literally more than the amount needed to make a major galaxy.

  • @fisher9943
    @fisher9943 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    2:16 " it's unlikely anyone could count to a billion" I
    Florida man: do you underestimate me?

  • @te-bo7618
    @te-bo7618 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    “What’s the largest comprehensible number” is a realistic line to say. Or ‘phrase’.

  • @RedshiftYT
    @RedshiftYT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +265

    largest number is how many years my dad has been gone to get milk

    • @justsomeguywithamask1564
      @justsomeguywithamask1564 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Just 15 years right

    • @SpaceIsAwesome0358
      @SpaceIsAwesome0358 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@justsomeguywithamask1564
      no its graham’s number x itself about grahm’s number times

    • @golbox4
      @golbox4 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not mine

    • @lemonpocky897
      @lemonpocky897 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Cringe that joke is overused

    • @envalence450
      @envalence450 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SpaceIsAwesome0358 are you high on serious drugs

  • @ZachTeeVee
    @ZachTeeVee ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I wish they made a mechanism in game like that 😅

    • @larryslemp9698
      @larryslemp9698 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah for Romper Room!!

    • @ZachTeeVee
      @ZachTeeVee 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Definetly

  • @preetunadkat7083
    @preetunadkat7083 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2:16
    Goku casually doing a BILLION pushups as his daily routine

  • @invaziondzxn4716
    @invaziondzxn4716 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    5:10 Mission failed successfully

  • @ligenyodu2645
    @ligenyodu2645 3 ปีที่แล้ว +158

    imagine if 0 was never discovered. Indians must be proud.

    • @ray6936
      @ray6936 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What are u trying to say?

    • @kupukipi
      @kupukipi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@ray6936 Indians made 0

    • @nilakshguleria2121
      @nilakshguleria2121 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      😀😊

    • @ligenyodu2645
      @ligenyodu2645 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@helloworld7690 precisely

    • @Dinosaurs_with_laser_guns
      @Dinosaurs_with_laser_guns 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Here we go. What if division wasn’t discovered? Wouldn’t tribalism exist?

  • @Enlightenment0172
    @Enlightenment0172 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Googology Wiki:
    “Hold my beer.”

  • @lucaspanto9650
    @lucaspanto9650 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thought this was going to talk about larger numbers like tree(3), scg(3) and sscg(3)

    • @Myrslokstok
      @Myrslokstok หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes this video could go on for 10 h there are a video like that!

  • @trythismod4150
    @trythismod4150 3 ปีที่แล้ว +190

    Fun fact : The largest number is how many time your crush ignore you

    • @HangingDGrunt
      @HangingDGrunt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Jokes on you, I don't have a crush.

    • @gitchincanama580
      @gitchincanama580 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@HangingDGrunt *shows hand*

    • @otherssingpuree1779
      @otherssingpuree1779 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It just feels that way. The largest number is when your parents are embarrassed to mention you to their friends.

    • @rosxjun
      @rosxjun 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bruh...😭

    • @Kora-Nightmare-Nemesis
      @Kora-Nightmare-Nemesis 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      that sucks

  • @expired6522
    @expired6522 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    riddddddddddddddle: billion this where we get serious
    me: :O
    teacher: what is a billion?
    me: a place where we get serious
    teacher: correct

    • @kerbodynamicx472
      @kerbodynamicx472 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Expired 💯

    • @fsjal_scout7944
      @fsjal_scout7944 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Asian af

    • @expired6522
      @expired6522 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fsjal_scout7944 im not asian

    • @fsjal_scout7944
      @fsjal_scout7944 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Expired that’s not what I mean but ok

    • @stevevanzandt6784
      @stevevanzandt6784 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      An endless billion times infinity/eternity how much is that number gonna be about &amount to???🐈🐈🐈🦆🦆🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️😻🦆🌞🌞🌞🌞🐧🐧🐧

  • @King-Daphe
    @King-Daphe ปีที่แล้ว

    7:44 the way he said cool killed me 😂😂

  • @Tenissor
    @Tenissor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The HPD(n) function:
    HPD(n) = n^^^^(7^20)
    HPD(7) is so large that it would take millions of years to calculate. Imagine HPD(HPD(9000))
    HPD stands for HyperProDigious.
    The TREE(n) function:
    TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(g63)))) Generates a ridiculously large number that cannot be calculated before the sun bursts.

  • @paull2937
    @paull2937 2 ปีที่แล้ว +237

    If Graham’s number is far bigger than all the Planck volume in the known universe, and since a dollar bill is much larger than a Planck volume, then Graham’s number in US dollars would be much, much more massive than what you showed in your thumbnail. Graham’s number dollars is much, much more than filling the whole universe with 100 dollar bills.

    • @santo8813
      @santo8813 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Clickbait. Ass video lol

    • @martinplayer2348
      @martinplayer2348 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Yeah that's actually what I was thinking about😂😂
      Cool that we have the same thoughts!

    • @bryantofsomething5964
      @bryantofsomething5964 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      If you put the amount of atoms in the observable universe as the amount of arrows between something like a googol and a googolplex, you would still be nowhere near graham's number.

    • @martinplayer2348
      @martinplayer2348 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@bryantofsomething5964 wtf🤯🤯

    • @archieburns6260
      @archieburns6260 ปีที่แล้ว

      The whole observable universe

  • @TheRealMcCoy88
    @TheRealMcCoy88 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Me: checks account balance......... ah man only $92 quadrillion left in my account, what am I to do with such peasant money 😂

    • @tqhyxl_9966
      @tqhyxl_9966 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      smh i have 48 trillion left in my bank account

    • @armanlifts
      @armanlifts 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Bruh I only have 100 graham 😭😭😭

    • @desbugfan8429
      @desbugfan8429 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I only have, like, 170.

    • @altar8010
      @altar8010 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Noooooooo i have only 10^Graham number ^googol plex x 10 ^septrillion dollar

    • @user-ys2lz1nn4q
      @user-ys2lz1nn4q 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol, i have only 25 sen, this is no joking, what should i do

  • @frostyjim2633
    @frostyjim2633 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'll need one to count my money after I start selling my device that removes certain people from TV commercials

  • @BrianHanifan
    @BrianHanifan ปีที่แล้ว

    With Graham's number worth of US Dollars and I still wouldn't have enough money to buy all the DLC for Train Simulator

  • @JJJnl
    @JJJnl 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think it's funny how he says de bruin hehe as a Dutch person it sounds hilarious 😅😅 anyway if you would count everything it be way more then whatever numbers you wanna make ))

  • @user-ws6bu1yb9i
    @user-ws6bu1yb9i 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Can they do a scale of kyriakos grizzly vs the entire universe

    • @mitskifan5875
      @mitskifan5875 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He would die because of a black hole

  • @JDog_Vlogs
    @JDog_Vlogs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Im gonna start counting to a googol boys, wish me luck🙏

    • @trunzlerclement3227
      @trunzlerclement3227 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Don't do it. But let the flat earthers count. At least they'll do something useful 😂😂🤣

    • @JDog_Vlogs
      @JDog_Vlogs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@trunzlerclement3227 you couldn't have said it better😂😂😭

    • @trunzlerclement3227
      @trunzlerclement3227 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JDog_Vlogs 😂😂😂

    • @richardhoak7384
      @richardhoak7384 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@trunzlerclement3227 I love that idea LOL! 😀😀😅😅😄😄😃😃

    • @annunegi6462
      @annunegi6462 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don't need luck, you need some extra mouth 😋

  • @RAIOXBOX
    @RAIOXBOX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "No matter how many gears there are, if you spin the first gear once, the last gear will move aswell. no matter if it moves a googolth of a turn, it will always move"

    • @reizinhodojogo3956
      @reizinhodojogo3956 ปีที่แล้ว

      wind is probaly moving more than that, in a year obviously

  • @ilijaradosavljevic4976
    @ilijaradosavljevic4976 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    When he daid "You need 38 day to count a billuon" i started counting. 😂

  • @vadimev
    @vadimev 3 ปีที่แล้ว +241

    “10^94 books would weigh more than the Milky Way galaxy.” Umm, I should hope so, since there are only 10^80 atoms in the entire known universe. Did they forget that fact half way through the video? Smh.

    • @AlexJones-ue1ll
      @AlexJones-ue1ll 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yop, they appearently forgot that tiny piece of information.

    • @aeryxis956
      @aeryxis956 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      black holes ig

    • @sorry6726
      @sorry6726 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Since there is 95% dark matter and energy , so

    • @AlexJones-ue1ll
      @AlexJones-ue1ll 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@sorry6726 so what? Doesnt change the fact that he stated there are 10^80 atoms in the (known) universe, yet 10^94 books would weigh as much as the whole galaxy. That doesnt add up. Unless you now a way to print a book on 10^-15 atoms

    • @TheAgamemnon911
      @TheAgamemnon911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks. I also hate it when YT videos do this.

  • @oscarponce1
    @oscarponce1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    "The biggest imaginable number is Graham's Number."
    *Laughs in Rayo's Number*

    • @wv6309
      @wv6309 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Chuckles in ♾+1

    • @dhruvchitroda
      @dhruvchitroda 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wv6309 laughs in ♾️

    • @guest12200
      @guest12200 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      **Laughs in 100 pigalipontivalogifaribodigrofidojigillion**
      (10∞)

    • @lean2260
      @lean2260 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      remember kids, infinity is not a number, it's a loop

    • @JotaroGamingg
      @JotaroGamingg ปีที่แล้ว

      laughs in omega to the power of omega to the power of omega to the power of omega

  • @YtubeUserr
    @YtubeUserr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good, now do a representation of aleph-null.

  • @laddugamer2782
    @laddugamer2782 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Our brains are so developed that we dont have to think of a googol outcomes in a chess match and we can guess what our opponent's next move will be

  • @SuperNikolaras
    @SuperNikolaras 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Biggest number is the 60 secs when you do a plank and everyone knows that.

    • @thiccchungo1041
      @thiccchungo1041 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Shit you’re right

    • @daddymuggle
      @daddymuggle 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ah, but what if you can only plank for 60 planck times?

    • @petterlarsson7257
      @petterlarsson7257 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your grammar is astonishing

  • @abrahamvasquez6376
    @abrahamvasquez6376 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    So weird to hear this guy not scream “hey arnold”

  • @carrollwilliams8861
    @carrollwilliams8861 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For extra speed, add a gerbil.

  • @mihaandj
    @mihaandj 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "What's the largest number you can imagine?"
    Me: Idk like 10?
    "Trillions of Trillions!"

  • @SommetiderHvorforDetRoligRolig
    @SommetiderHvorforDetRoligRolig 3 ปีที่แล้ว +154

    If you manually turned the last wheel All the way around in 1 second, would that then make the first wheel go faster then the speed of light? I know its not possible for it to go faster, and btw.. I feel like it would take an extreme amount of force to spin the last wheel?

    • @gabrielzellweger3465
      @gabrielzellweger3465 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The speed of light, or the speed of information is closely related to infinity. You need a literal infinite amount of energy, to bring the machine up to that speed. Witch btw. i guess, only takes around 10 decimals off of 1 Googol seconds; down to 10 to the power of 90 seconds.
      What you revering to, is imagined Information. A shadow for example "can" travel over the speed of light, but only because it is the absence of stuff (light casting the shadow). Imagine you casting a shadow on the moon with your hand. That shadow can now move over light speed with a simple hand gesture but your hand and the light around your shadow still cant.
      Anything out of mater simply cant do that. The machine would break or you would never have enough juice to reach over lightspeed RPM.

    • @jessebrown4347
      @jessebrown4347 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yeah it would probably take a googolplex of torque to attempt to rotate the last gear, and the gears would probably shatter if you tried lol

    • @2mjz84
      @2mjz84 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      How about instead of people saying “The gears would Just break” make stronger gears⚙️? Very simple solution then attach a fucking 9000hp engine to the Gears and spin that bastard as hard as possible it would still probably take a long time but its still faster than doing it yourself 😂🤷‍♂️ get something graphene for the gears and you’re all set

    • @asktheetruscans9857
      @asktheetruscans9857 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You're one of those people that breaks the Rubic's cube and puts it back together, right?!

    • @roff000
      @roff000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hmmm good Idea lol

  • @lostowens5810
    @lostowens5810 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    7:40 it was on daily does of internet also

  • @I_Love_Llamas
    @I_Love_Llamas 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now we need to know what 10 to the power of googolplex is called

  • @Renderthetender
    @Renderthetender 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I know somthing that u can describe for googol the amount of years until his dad comes back

  • @anantkumar3392
    @anantkumar3392 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Now I felt the importance of zeroes that I used to get in exams....😁😁those were precious !!!!

  • @remaudy6409
    @remaudy6409 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    Me after watching this: “Google... googol... google. What’s google? Why does it sound weird now??

    • @ipotatosenpai7002
      @ipotatosenpai7002 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nooo u did it to me tooo now

    • @isaacnewton7424
      @isaacnewton7424 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same

    • @malevolution7041
      @malevolution7041 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ah yes, semantic satiation. It sucks at the best of times.

    • @optidanprime8434
      @optidanprime8434 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He messed up, 1 followed by 100 zeros is googolplex

    • @malevolution7041
      @malevolution7041 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@optidanprime8434 then what's a googol?

  • @daniyalkhan1702
    @daniyalkhan1702 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fun fact, if you were to pick any random positive integer, the chance of it being lower than Graham’s number, tree3, googleplexian, things like that is 0 percent chance.

  • @carlosgc9384
    @carlosgc9384 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "¿Is the googolplex the highest number in the world?"
    My brain: googolplex plus 1

  • @MusicLover-gp6dl
    @MusicLover-gp6dl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    6:01
    So can you imagine just how big..
    **Ad plays**
    Old Spice for men.

  • @XeptorKingGG
    @XeptorKingGG 3 ปีที่แล้ว +113

    Riddddle: "A Billion. Now this is where it gets serious."
    My teacher:"What type of serious activities Have you Kids Been doing Today?"
    Me:"*A Billion.*"
    Teacher: "Wh-"
    Me:"*A BILLION!*"

    • @razmuzen1090
      @razmuzen1090 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ?

    • @osmanbarber3655
      @osmanbarber3655 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      funny not detected.

    • @kateofone
      @kateofone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I get it

    • @Rav3nnn
      @Rav3nnn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Stop it, get some help.

    • @osmanbarber3655
      @osmanbarber3655 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@kateofone everyone got it but it wasn't a funny joke.

  • @amandalee3144
    @amandalee3144 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man that machine kinda makes life feel to short

  • @gigiobigio0002
    @gigiobigio0002 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mathematicians on their way to make an enormous number and give it their name even if it has no purpose at all

  • @JunaidRiazAlHassan
    @JunaidRiazAlHassan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    .. Somewhere between
    “ 8 toffees for 1 rupee” and
    “1 toffee for 8 rupees”,
    we grew up!
    Somewhere between
    “Ground mai aaja” (Come to the park) and
    “Online aaja”, (Come online)
    we grew up!
    Somewhere between
    “stealing chocolate of our sister” and “Buying chocolate for her children”,
    we grew up!
    Somewhere between
    “Just five more mins Maa” and “Pressing the snooze button”,
    we grew up!
    Somewhere between
    “Crying out loud just to get what we want” and
    “Holding our tears when we are broken inside”,
    we grew up!
    Somewhere between
    “I want to grow up” and
    “I want to be a child again”,
    we grew up!
    Somewhere between
    “Lets meet and plan” and
    “Lets plan and meet”,
    we grew up!
    Somewhere between
    "Being afraid of our parents"
    and
    "Praying for our parents" we finally grew up
    And as we grew up, we realize;
    How silently, our lives have changed.....

  • @YHTheGamer
    @YHTheGamer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    How about Rayo's number? That number is huge as well!

    • @hamadmustafa9854
      @hamadmustafa9854 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yeah... He didn't do complete research.

    • @XenXenOfficial
      @XenXenOfficial 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      There's a lot of different large numbers lol Smith's number, Googolplexian, Skewes Number, Tree(3), etc. He made the video 10 minutes long since you can fit a few more ads in a relatively short video.

    • @jonahwilliams1835
      @jonahwilliams1835 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yea seriously

    • @whitrenee1
      @whitrenee1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      YH The Gamer Or BIG FOOT! Does That Count

    • @golightning291
      @golightning291 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      someone's been watching Numberphileeee

  • @LordsOfMindset
    @LordsOfMindset ปีที่แล้ว +13

    me: *does graham's number + 1*

    • @reizinhodojogo3956
      @reizinhodojogo3956 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      graham sequence of g(g(g(g(g(g(g...(64))))))... is bigger than graham number + 1, also if u just add +1 the opponent will too and it will never end

    • @catpoisonlover
      @catpoisonlover ปีที่แล้ว

      G65

    • @wadewilson-xi1zs
      @wadewilson-xi1zs 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It doesn’t work like that, Graham‘s number is the dimension it would take for the lines in a type of hypercube to plane.

    • @cokxi
      @cokxi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wadewilson-xi1zs idk what that is but sure, it does work that way, graham's number + 1 will be greater than grahams number, I mean any finite number + 1 would be greater than that finite number.

    • @wadewilson-xi1zs
      @wadewilson-xi1zs 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cokxi 😂

  • @errormac9
    @errormac9 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Don't forget about everything between Tree(3, 4, 5) and Rayo's number. Hell, might as well bring up countable infinity while we're at it.
    The definition of Rayo's number is a variation on the definition: The smallest number bigger than any finite number named by an expression in the language of first-order set theory with a googol symbols or less.

  • @colinjenkins0
    @colinjenkins0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This dude is awesome, he edits his videos perfectly, and always keeps grinding, keep it up bro

    • @santo8813
      @santo8813 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s filled with misinformation, it’s also really rushed and really lazy.

    • @fandroid6491
      @fandroid6491 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao just look at the googol number, the commas are put in the wrong place and that one pesky 0 keeps bugging me.