The Atom Soldier - The Big Picture

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024
  • National Archives and Records Administration
    ARC Identifier 2569578 / Local Identifier 111-TV-308
    Big Picture: The Atom Soldier
    DVD copied by Master Scanner Thomas Gideon. Department of Defense. Department of the Army. Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations. U.S. Army Audiovisual Center. (ca. 1974 - 05/15/1984). Tests conducted at Frenchman's Flat, Nevada, in January of 1955, the Army at Camp Desert Rock, utilized thousands of ground troops in an effort to establish the proper coordination between the foot soldier and the atomic explosion.

ความคิดเห็น • 31

  • @eastbaytruther8073
    @eastbaytruther8073 12 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Test Equipment = The Soldiers.

  • @Mark_Ocain
    @Mark_Ocain 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "eyes melt...skin explodes...everybody dead" - J Frank Parnell

  • @scarakus
    @scarakus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yup, I'd buy tickets to watch one of these go off.. It's on my bucket list!

    • @macsdaddy3383
      @macsdaddy3383 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Back in the '50 all you had to do was live in Vegas. The show was free and many times could easily be seen right from the hotel you stayed at.

  • @williamfitch1408
    @williamfitch1408 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This is from an era when doctor's said smoking was good for you :-)

  • @MrShobar
    @MrShobar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    22:15. "Let's smoke a cigarette before we inhale some radioactive dust..."

  • @PlasmaCoolantLeak
    @PlasmaCoolantLeak 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Part of this was used in "The Atomic Cafe."

  • @billb2479
    @billb2479 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The briefer is obviously indoors but the troops are sitting out in the open!

  • @RavenBlaze
    @RavenBlaze 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    6:57 "like running cross wise to the wind to avoid as much fall-out as possible"

  • @ConnorLundeen
    @ConnorLundeen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Fun fact folks: we as a society actually had a better understanding of the capabilities of nuclear power and weaponry back when this film was produced. Now the world is so filled with anti-nuclear marketing campaigns by big oil and coal that we find it unintelligible that they treated these nuclear weapons as they had; even though their reaction is closer to the truth than ours.

    • @kitkat9648
      @kitkat9648 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's actually not fact at all. I personally knew Bob Costello, Manhattan Project scientist. I also work with the veterans who were actually there at Desert Rock and other nuclear weapons testing events around the world. There is documented generational genetic anomalies from ionizing radiation exposure.

  • @RavenBlaze
    @RavenBlaze 12 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "You can live through an atomic attack... just not very long"

  • @macsdaddy3383
    @macsdaddy3383 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder if MSGT Queen would have ever cheerfully and willingly volunteered to leave his nice clean MDW assignment to go into the field at the Nevada Test Site to stand by while someone lit a nuke off in-front of him, so the Army could determine what the safe conditions, distances, CONOPS, and TTP's would be for troops operating in/around the nuclear battlefield? Seriously, it would be interesting to see the VA compensation rates for, the mobility and mortality rates, and the number of each type of Cancer's on the guys who had to take part in these tests.

  • @luvslogistics1725
    @luvslogistics1725 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Were they not radiated when approaching ground zero afterwards?

  • @Robin6512
    @Robin6512 14 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    wonder how many died of radiation 10 to 20 years later...........

    • @scarakus
      @scarakus 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      30 to 40 years after...

    • @rapman5791
      @rapman5791 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not many. Believe it or not, most men lived well into their 70’s & 80’s.

  • @ole9421
    @ole9421 11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    There's only two reactions you can have while watching this training film. You'll either burst out laughing or cry at the sheer arrogant and optimistic insanity of it all.

    • @JDA2185
      @JDA2185 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There was no other way back then. The US needed to remain militarily invulnerable and no amount and no amount of conventional military would've accomplished that purpose. The nuclear option was the only option. Although I do agree that the Army's efforts to "fight and win" nuclear war by still maintaining that component of conventional warfare "land grabbing and holding" was pathetic. In a nuclear war, land grabbing or land seizing means nothing. A nuclear war is only about destroying the enemy's forces and that's it. There's no land to grab there anymore as all of it is highly radioactuve.

  • @KawasakiKiteh
    @KawasakiKiteh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Non Judicial Punishment sucks eh.

  • @MountainRaven1960
    @MountainRaven1960 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One flash…. you’re ASH!

  • @runnre
    @runnre ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Watching this to get ready for when Russia starts launching nukes.

  • @geonerd
    @geonerd 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    More Nukes!
    Thanks, once again! :)

  • @amineamine-bl1zp
    @amineamine-bl1zp 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    😀👏👏👏👏

  • @georgeholt8929
    @georgeholt8929 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What I want to know is how many of you who are watching this video now in 2020 are still eating fish out of the Pacific Ocean, since the nuclear meltdown that followed the earthquake/Tsunami that hit Japan some years ago. That left a plume of radiation that moved across the ocean. Sure that kind of radiation has a short half life. It’s 35 years in the future. So in approximately 90 years the amount of radiation in the Pacific Ocean will be about 25% of what it is today. Personally I like fish out of the Great Lakes, or the streams in America, I don’t eat Salmon anymore.

  • @amineamine-bl1zp
    @amineamine-bl1zp 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    😁👏👏👏👏