Dimapelo Manual more like the size of the car issues here. I drive 2 times bigger car daily and I’m basically scared to get into smaller cars, especially as a passenger
@@jansteen5640 Yeah? I had 2015 polo 1.2 TSI and for two years as company car 2013-2014 golf. The polo was utter shit, I was so disgusted by the utterly cheap interior and annoyig engine of it that I sold it at loss. Currently I have 2019 500 1.2 lounge. It drives like a dream. and is as safr and planted on motorways at any speed. On comfort level it's more or less on the same level as Audi A1 2016 that my girlfriend has. You wanna know what's death trap? Toyota Aygo, peugeot 108 and Citroen c1. They are made of cheapest sheet metal available and have garbage of an engine in them. Don't bash a car you never owned/driven, that's not healthy. I know that there are lots of propaganda against fiats, but until you owned one, you'll never understand how they are. There is a reason why you see a 500 in every corner. The 500 owners are not stupid, they know what they get for 17+ thousand of their money.
Questo è il terzo video dove continui a fare il professore con questo gps del cazzo ! Mi spieghi cosa cazzo hai contro ste 500 ? Ti ripeto se vuoi le alte velocità vai a vederti i video di auto con 500+ cavalli !
@@trg4353 punto 1) ma che vuoi e chi ti conosce, sono liberissimo, come tutti, di esprimere il mio parere nei limiti dell’educazione. Punto2) io amo le 500 con ogni motore(ne possiedo anche una pensa un po’ !) e il fatto che tu pensi che io le odi, è solo un problema tuo onestamente. E non si tratta di essere professori, ma di essere precisi e attendibili per chi legge. Questo motore più di 160/165 reali NON FA. Fare video in discesa per far vedere che fa 180/190 ha poco senso, visto che ogni macchina in discesa può aumentare la sua velocità massima. E poi mi fai morì... è il terzo video..quindi? Che te ne frega? Bah! La libertà di potersi esprimere,non va confusa con la possibilità di dire cose sconclusionate, quindi metti in funzione il cervello prima di scrivere qualcosa.
@@bloffama ma va ma che ti blocco, ti ripeto, in 5 video hai detto sempre la stessa cosa come a screditare il motore ! Io personalmente lo trovo un motore da città , meno vispo rispetto al 1.3 75cv che avevo ! Infatti io a questo 1.2 avrei messo almeno 85 cv con più coppia !
Everywhere I go, I read a lot of good things about the 500. But only as a city car. When it comes to highways, it is a horror, they say. Wind noises, motor too loud, bad noises and driving. It feels all the bumps, when the wind is stronger you get swayed from side to side and the 1.2 is just the base model. However, why I decided to buy it (even though I do highways) and omit the Mini cooper, is the unique design which makes it an icon. The original was one and the new models are too. It is supposedly fun to drive and sit in. It is a combination of modern and retro. A shame, really, that the 1.2 engine is not as good for highways, but I had the 1.1 Panda, which is basically the same engine and car (a 500 is a panda in a different cloak, they say) and the 1.1 petrol did 150kmh on a highway easy. so the 1.2 in a smaller and lighter car shouldn't be so bad.
WakingCobain but that's the thing with European small cars: they're called city cars and are in the subcompact A category for a reason. Not only the 1.2, which is a pretty old design, but definitely also theit turbo two cylinder, Volkswagens n/a 1.0 or turbo three cylinders, … are meant for city use. They get great economy over there and make sense, because European cities streets are just very small and narrow, they're historical and it's what makes them look pretty, but also what makes smaller cars more practical. I spent almost a year doing nothing but city driving with a VW 1.0 3cyl (na, 60 hp / 95 Nm) and I never managed to get a higher consumption than 6,2 l/100km!! Not close to the advertised 4,9 l, but for a gasoline car in city conditions... very good. And honestly, that car wasn't even too bad for highway driving. Did 120 km/h at 3.000 rpm and 180 at a little over 4.000 if it allowed it to. I've seen bigger engines do worse. But, even at 120 km/h, consumption usually creeped up to 7 l / 100 km, which wouldn't even be considered good for a bigger sedan with a 2.0 on gasoline. They're city cars, but because of some parts of Europe taxing on vehicles wieght and / or displacement (a smaller engine makes more sense and is more efficient in a smaller car), these cars are used for all kinds of things they weren't originally designed for. VW tries to make their subcompacts like the up or polo as highway capable as possible as well, but that's just not what they're for. When I moved out of the city, I traded the little three potter for a certified pre owned (na) V8. Love driving it, rarely needs more than 2k rpm in normal driving conditions, even uphill and just a nicer car for highway cruising or for driving around in my large town. On the highway, consumption is pretty similar to my previous car even though my current one is 3 times heavier! I'm not the best example and I just wanted that car, but some people really just buy a Toyota Aygo 1.0 to drive 150 km a day from and to work. That's just not the car for you.
Auf der A1 und der A2, kann man bei 3 spurig ,ganz rechts wesentlich schneller fahren wie ganz links, siehe video. Rechts alles frei, nur mittelspurschleicher
@@mattiasso No, the Palio wasn't available with the Firefly engine, it is still the Fire Evo. His successor, the Fiat Argo is equipped with the Firefly engine
@@jusb1066 I think 999kg isn't heavy. The Palio is bigger than the Aygo. If you have Instagram, follow @that.black.fiat.palio for you see my car, I think you will like it
It seems pretty windy at the beginning. How does it cope? Does it suffer lateral winds a lot?
7 ปีที่แล้ว +10
Tommaso Hi Tommaso, it's right, at the beginning it was quite windy and I was very surprised how stable the car laid on the street. Even at top speed it felt to be absolute safe and comfortable.
I have a 500 2013, it is very stable in the wind. The wind noise is also low, i does not increase very much with high speed. Unfortunately the fuel consumption increases much because of the front size of the car, also a 6 gear had been good. I often drive 600 km from Stockholm to Helsingborg at average speed of 100 km/h, the consumption is almost 6 liters for 100 km.
it has 70hp, much more than many city cars from the past, so is more capable, many old school 1.5l had less HP than this, and 4 gears, yet were the ordinary cars for 99 percent of people
@@1peralna okay that helps when the car is parked. However, when you start it, if you forget to have the clutch engaged it can cause the car to jump. Isn't that so?
Meiner fährt nur 160 km/h mit 69 PS und deiner 190 km/h mit 69 PS !!! Außerdem habe ich nicht einmal ein Tablet in meinem FIAT 500 !!! Wie kann das nur sein ???
5 ปีที่แล้ว +1
190 waren bergab und das Infotainment System in der Mitte gehört zur aktuellen generation
Io possiedo una Daihatsu Sirion seconda serie acquistata nel 2008 (meccanica Toyota), l'ho abbastanza "maltrattata"...eppure a 85000 km non c'è neppure una plastica che scricchiola. Ma cosa ne possono sapere i fiattari nazionalisti leccapalle del sistema? 😂
ÜBERHOLSPUR Ein 1.2 MIT 69 PS auf 190? Denkste ich bin bloede? Da brauchst di pferdchen Mann. Dein tacho spinnt. Ich habe einen yaris MIT 100 PS diesel und der kommt auf 190. Ueberleg mal.
6 ปีที่แล้ว +5
Danny Kluge Tachoabweichung wird gegeben sein, da widerspreche ich gar nicht. Die 190 sind auch nicht GPS gemessen sondern nur die Tacho Anzeige.
Solange man angemessen überholt und rechts Verkehr ist, spielt die Spur kaum eine Rolle. Nur weil man 200 fährt, ist das keine Berechtigung dauerhaft links zu fahren. Je nach Verkhrssituation kann man einen LKW mit 120 überholen und genauso mit 240 auf der rechten Spur fahren.
I turn the key and start the engine.
*_thats how ma fiat works_*
lol
This comment deserves more likes to be honest.
Wow this was actually really quick... only 13 minutes to get to 190km/h!
just shy of 120mph in a coffin lol
At least that small car fucks other small cars such a smart,IQ,Twingo etc...
@@IIITOXICIII mini s fucks em all up, except the abarth
@@clover8673 well mini is not a small car anymore
is not bad for 69 hp
Thank you
Downhill easy..
This motor begin his life in 90's whith 60 hp and 8 valve. In many years it has got 65, 70, 80, 85. Now has 69 but real are 78cv
Fabrizio Fina 😊👍🏼
حي الله النعيمي
so funny, imagine having this cute car flashing you with the left blinker on the autobahn !
Must happen with the Abarth :)
The Fiat 500 is the best car i'm ever seen. I'm 15 and is my dream to have this car 😁
Good performance from a small non turbo engine.
This is my dream car
I had some anxiety the entire time watching this. lol
Yeah haha it kind of wasn't fast enough haha
Dimapelo Manual more like the size of the car issues here. I drive 2 times bigger car daily and I’m basically scared to get into smaller cars, especially as a passenger
I have the exact same car, I seel safer in it that I did in my Polo and Golf. This car is substantial.
@@remid1994 Then you must have had golfs and polos sub 2000's. This car would be a coffin on wheels. But it isn't large enough.
@@jansteen5640 Yeah? I had 2015 polo 1.2 TSI and for two years as company car 2013-2014 golf. The polo was utter shit, I was so disgusted by the utterly cheap interior and annoyig engine of it that I sold it at loss. Currently I have 2019 500 1.2 lounge. It drives like a dream. and is as safr and planted on motorways at any speed. On comfort level it's more or less on the same level as Audi A1 2016 that my girlfriend has.
You wanna know what's death trap? Toyota Aygo, peugeot 108 and Citroen c1. They are made of cheapest sheet metal available and have garbage of an engine in them.
Don't bash a car you never owned/driven, that's not healthy. I know that there are lots of propaganda against fiats, but until you owned one, you'll never understand how they are. There is a reason why you see a 500 in every corner. The 500 owners are not stupid, they know what they get for 17+ thousand of their money.
good videio and nice sound engine ...good work for a 1,2 69 hp ...!:)
Danke Ronnie. Dieses Video hat die tiefe Liebe zur Formel 1 in mir wiedererweckt!
Was?
Forza fiat. I own a fiat 500c 1.2. I am going to try It.
Paul Meester good luck *russian accent*
in the thumbnail i thought it was some kind of supercar actually.
I also thought it was a Porsche for a second
beautiful downhill... :D this engine take vel max 165 kmh (with gps results)
Questo è il terzo video dove continui a fare il professore con questo gps del cazzo ! Mi spieghi cosa cazzo hai contro ste 500 ? Ti ripeto se vuoi le alte velocità vai a vederti i video di auto con 500+ cavalli !
@@trg4353 punto 1) ma che vuoi e chi ti conosce, sono liberissimo, come tutti, di esprimere il mio parere nei limiti dell’educazione. Punto2) io amo le 500 con ogni motore(ne possiedo anche una pensa un po’ !) e il fatto che tu pensi che io le odi, è solo un problema tuo onestamente.
E non si tratta di essere professori, ma di essere precisi e attendibili per chi legge. Questo motore più di 160/165 reali NON FA. Fare video in discesa per far vedere che fa 180/190 ha poco senso, visto che ogni macchina in discesa può aumentare la sua velocità massima. E poi mi fai morì... è il terzo video..quindi? Che te ne frega? Bah! La libertà di potersi esprimere,non va confusa con la possibilità di dire cose sconclusionate, quindi metti in funzione il cervello prima di scrivere qualcosa.
@@bloffama hai commentato ogni video in cui è presente questa 500 sempre precisando la velocità massima con i tuoi test gps !
@@trg4353 bloccami 🤷🏻♂️ così non li leggi più! ma che ti devo dire??? Cose da pazzi 🤦🏻
@@bloffama ma va ma che ti blocco, ti ripeto, in 5 video hai detto sempre la stessa cosa come a screditare il motore !
Io personalmente lo trovo un motore da città , meno vispo rispetto al 1.3 75cv che avevo ! Infatti io a questo 1.2 avrei messo almeno 85 cv con più coppia !
Fiat power!!
EXCELLENT vidéo. THANKS men 🏁🏁🏁
you are brave.. I wouldn't drive this beyond city limits..
2:40 .. and lets start the race
69 PS und 190km/h. Oh mein Gott.
Everywhere I go, I read a lot of good things about the 500. But only as a city car. When it comes to highways, it is a horror, they say. Wind noises, motor too loud, bad noises and driving. It feels all the bumps, when the wind is stronger you get swayed from side to side and the 1.2 is just the base model. However, why I decided to buy it (even though I do highways) and omit the Mini cooper, is the unique design which makes it an icon. The original was one and the new models are too. It is supposedly fun to drive and sit in. It is a combination of modern and retro. A shame, really, that the 1.2 engine is not as good for highways, but I had the 1.1 Panda, which is basically the same engine and car (a 500 is a panda in a different cloak, they say) and the 1.1 petrol did 150kmh on a highway easy. so the 1.2 in a smaller and lighter car shouldn't be so bad.
i dont need to know german to know what that means lol
worst is the unreliable engine electrics, misfires at high engine loads, cpu failures, the other issues are no worse than any other small car
WakingCobain but that's the thing with European small cars: they're called city cars and are in the subcompact A category for a reason. Not only the 1.2, which is a pretty old design, but definitely also theit turbo two cylinder, Volkswagens n/a 1.0 or turbo three cylinders, … are meant for city use. They get great economy over there and make sense, because European cities streets are just very small and narrow, they're historical and it's what makes them look pretty, but also what makes smaller cars more practical. I spent almost a year doing nothing but city driving with a VW 1.0 3cyl (na, 60 hp / 95 Nm) and I never managed to get a higher consumption than 6,2 l/100km!! Not close to the advertised 4,9 l, but for a gasoline car in city conditions... very good. And honestly, that car wasn't even too bad for highway driving. Did 120 km/h at 3.000 rpm and 180 at a little over 4.000 if it allowed it to. I've seen bigger engines do worse. But, even at 120 km/h, consumption usually creeped up to 7 l / 100 km, which wouldn't even be considered good for a bigger sedan with a 2.0 on gasoline.
They're city cars, but because of some parts of Europe taxing on vehicles wieght and / or displacement (a smaller engine makes more sense and is more efficient in a smaller car), these cars are used for all kinds of things they weren't originally designed for. VW tries to make their subcompacts like the up or polo as highway capable as possible as well, but that's just not what they're for.
When I moved out of the city, I traded the little three potter for a certified pre owned (na) V8. Love driving it, rarely needs more than 2k rpm in normal driving conditions, even uphill and just a nicer car for highway cruising or for driving around in my large town. On the highway, consumption is pretty similar to my previous car even though my current one is 3 times heavier!
I'm not the best example and I just wanted that car, but some people really just buy a Toyota Aygo 1.0 to drive 150 km a day from and to work. That's just not the car for you.
Ich hab ihn in einem starken Gefälle auf 200 (laut Tacho) bekommen 😆. Das fühlt sich an wie ein Ritt auf einer Kanonenkugel.
Auf der A1 und der A2, kann man bei 3 spurig ,ganz rechts wesentlich schneller fahren wie ganz links, siehe video. Rechts alles frei, nur mittelspurschleicher
Not bad for such a small car :D
Totally going downhill. In a flat road this doesn't go above 165 km/h
It goes surely 180 because i just tested it with mine on a flat road
@@MuhKuh9ft13 nice!! where are you from?
@@DimapeloManual Austria, drove in Germany
If u reached 180kmh with this 1.2 liter fiat then how much can mine golf 4 1.6 liter with 105 hp reach? :D
@@marecar16 195/200
Tolles Auto!
Nice song and performance for 69hp
At this video your maximum speed was around at 195 km/h.
this is how a suv feels like
Slow?
@@coronette4708 no, the driving position, the seats, the feeling when u drive one of these
I have a Fiat Palio (Brazil), It has a 1.0L Fire Evo engine that develops 75hp, it is very good for a 999kg car.
Isn't it a FireFly?
@@mattiasso No, the Palio wasn't available with the Firefly engine, it is still the Fire Evo. His successor, the Fiat Argo is equipped with the Firefly engine
999 kg why so heavy? my toyota aygo is 840kg with 71 hp
@@jusb1066 I think 999kg isn't heavy. The Palio is bigger than the Aygo. If you have Instagram, follow @that.black.fiat.palio for you see my car, I think you will like it
True, my bike weights just 25KG! 999KG is too much! ... why would you compare an Aygo with a Palio? @@jusb1066
Cette vitesse avec une si petite auto et un si petit moteur, fiat fait 💪
The “Ferrari” alternative 🤣
Very good
It seems pretty windy at the beginning. How does it cope? Does it suffer lateral winds a lot?
Tommaso Hi Tommaso, it's right, at the beginning it was quite windy and I was very surprised how stable the car laid on the street. Even at top speed it felt to be absolute safe and comfortable.
My aunt has one, I drove it a couple of times. The only negative thing about it is it's underpowered, it would need 20 or so hp more.
I have a 500 2013, it is very stable in the wind. The wind noise is also low, i does not increase very much with high speed. Unfortunately the fuel consumption increases much because of the front size of the car, also a 6 gear had been good. I often drive 600 km from Stockholm to Helsingborg at average speed of 100 km/h, the consumption is almost 6 liters for 100 km.
The only thing missing with this video is some old Italian movie music
Ist das die A1 Nähe Wuppertal oder A61 bei Königswinter wo du fährst?
perfect death trap😮
for a city it is okay
Nice car but nothing for highspeed on Autobahn; we tested the 1.2 8V engine during our review as well and in my opinion it`s just a city car..
Why?
it has 70hp, much more than many city cars from the past, so is more capable, many old school 1.5l had less HP than this, and 4 gears, yet were the ordinary cars for 99 percent of people
@@jusb1066 *5/6 speed!
I've noticed this before in other videos by other people as well ― why do you start engine in gear instead of in Neutral?
When you leave the car in gear it acts like a double hand brake which never fails 🤙🏾
@@1peralna okay that helps when the car is parked.
However, when you start it, if you forget to have the clutch engaged it can cause the car to jump. Isn't that so?
@@arjunkrishnababu2719 yes but when you start the engine you alaways push the clutch
You could do a top speed run- on limited roads.
Then imgine an Abarth
How did they manage to make backseats in this thing? It must feel so uncomfortable back there.
Actually it isn't
Can u test a Mercedes A Class 170 cdi w168 on the autobahn ?
Is 60 fps the framerate or the top speed?
Framerate
@@justaweeb9086 Um
190 is as fast as my 1.2 would go also
Hello. Can you try on highway 500X 4x2 jtd 120 HP? Thank you very much
Fico na autoputu za velike decake
was für eine kamera benutzt du?
Das interior von dem ding is so schreklich
Hahahaha not bad, i like this car
Der 500 hat ein tolles Design und mit Abarth ist er wahrscheinlich richtig geil. Ein bisschen dröhnig mit Windgeräuschen aber naja...
👍
my 500 go to 200 Km/h why ???
190 km ???🙈🇮🇹🇮🇹
Nooo 170.👍🖐
ahahahahahahahaha la mitica 500
Is it moving?
...oder es ist kein FIAT 500 sondern ein Abarth
top speed at 7:24
Try the Abarth version
Meiner fährt nur 160 km/h mit 69 PS und deiner 190 km/h mit 69 PS !!! Außerdem habe ich nicht einmal ein Tablet in meinem FIAT 500 !!!
Wie kann das nur sein ???
190 waren bergab und das Infotainment System in der Mitte gehört zur aktuellen generation
@ sorry hab ich nicht gewusst...
Se lo fai un'altra volta la fondi
con una audi a1 sicurmente
1.2 fire è una bomba...
Are you using RON 95 benzene for this car?
belle ste fiat. Appena le compri super silenziose, robuste... sembrano di marmo. Ci fai manco 10.000 km e sembra ne hai percorsi 200.000.
@coupeista faidame fai da me sempre se non perdi qualche pezzo nel frattempo...
La plastica si sente al tatto e nelle orecchie
Io possiedo una Daihatsu Sirion seconda serie acquistata nel 2008 (meccanica Toyota), l'ho abbastanza "maltrattata"...eppure a 85000 km non c'è neppure una plastica che scricchiola. Ma cosa ne possono sapere i fiattari nazionalisti leccapalle del sistema? 😂
@@Lazyfrankie 85000 fa ridere
tipico stereotipo sulle FIAT. stronzate
Downhill
Very bad for a car is it any wonder cars give trouble he didn't even give the engine time to warm up correctly!!
Patrick Mc Mahon The Engine was warm before he even started the video
The engine was warm you dickhead
I thought it was an abarth...lol
쪼꼬미가 잘 달리네~ 길들이기 잘 됐남?
Better than SDI
I really hate the stupid decision Fiat did to put sunroof in all 500 versions
Marius Edoardo it makes it lighter and it’s in the original 500
Looks slow to me
190 km/ h fake you
He was in downhill
This is noisier than the kia pincanto 1.1
すげースピード出てるな。たかが1.2リットルの車でこんなにスピード出るの？
fiat tipo (POV Drive)
Would be interesting
Pare na strada un po' troppo favorevole ....credo sia poco reale ....cmq la 500 mi piace
Beh l'ha scritto che era in discesa... È stato onesto. Ahah
190?? Fake.
Danny Kluge Watch the video and you will see it
ÜBERHOLSPUR Ein 1.2 MIT 69 PS auf 190? Denkste ich bin bloede? Da brauchst di pferdchen Mann. Dein tacho spinnt. Ich habe einen yaris MIT 100 PS diesel und der kommt auf 190. Ueberleg mal.
Danny Kluge Tachoabweichung wird gegeben sein, da widerspreche ich gar nicht. Die 190 sind auch nicht GPS gemessen sondern nur die Tacho Anzeige.
Danny?? Berg ab 190!!! Der 500er schafft 165
Giuseppe S. Der schafft nicht mal berg ab 190. Vielleicht wenn man den vom Everest runterschubst.
Peinlich, schleichen tut man auf der standspur....
Solange man angemessen überholt und rechts Verkehr ist, spielt die Spur kaum eine Rolle. Nur weil man 200 fährt, ist das keine Berechtigung dauerhaft links zu fahren. Je nach Verkhrssituation kann man einen LKW mit 120 überholen und genauso mit 240 auf der rechten Spur fahren.
🤮🤮🤮
🖕🖕🖕🖕
💩💩💩💪