So if you take apart someone's Xbox without their permission, and then put it back together and there's no damage, then you probably haven't committed a criminal action, but you probably have committed the civil tort of trespass to chattels. Taking more than you're allowed from a candy bowl on Halloween is technically theft, since you only have permission to take a certain amount, but good luck getting a prosecutor to take the case. Embezzlement isn't just a crime that hurts rich people, people have embezzled from school districts and retirement funds, etc.
Technicaly they didn't BREAK anything, assuming they didn't ruin any parts during disassembly. So it's more of just infringement, than outright property destruction.
There is a zero percent chance that he didn't snap the plastic tabs that hold the top and bottom pieces of the outer shell and the scratch the mother board trying to take the x clamps off. Also does that dude just walk around with a t9 torx screwdriver bit all of the time? If not he actually just smashed the Xbox on the ground as hard as he could for the love of vandalism and criminal damage and now he's playing the "I wanted to know how it worked" card.
>Jaywalking is not morally wrong Well... It can potentially endanger young children who are better off seeing everyone around them looking left, right etc, using pedestrian crossings and obeying street lights, rather than jaywalkers, potentially making them think running across he street is the way to go, and potentially getting hurt over it. Not jaywalking technically is a part of 'village raises the child'.
To be fair, you'd have to teach the car drivers to obey signals and rules of the road too. Too many people die on crosswalks and signaled intersections because the signals are awful or the drivers just blast through a crosswalk with right on red while running someone over. Teach the operator of the multi ton fast moving weapon first.
If the kid is old enough that are allowed to cross the street without supervision espeshally withouck checking before hand then that's just darwinism stopping the parenting test early cuz how hard they failed at it
About embezzlement, etc. of course they need to be punished, what a silly idea, rich people can just do what they want ? Is that the signal we want to give as a society ? But if you steal a bread because you can't feed yourself because you are poor you go to jail ? I think countries like Switzerland have the right idea: the punishment depends on how much wealth you have, the more wealth the bigger the fine, etc. Because then everyone feels the pain of the punishment equally.
Punishment has to be handed it equally regardless or how rich or poor they are. Nobody gets sent to jail because they stole a loaf of bread. On the other hand, if they broke a window or threatened someone with a weapon to get the bread then they are going to jail. Switzerland is attempting to use their punishment as a deterrent. However, they are punishing people based on their financial success rather than the actual crime. If the crime is so low that you're only getting a fine then it really shouldn't matter. Especially since many of these fines are methods of generating income for the government rather than actual deterrents.
@@randallsanchez3161 Simple example: I have had a fine for a broken light, I don't care, I just keep driving (where I'm driving it doesn't really matter much for safety, mostly during the day anyway), the fine isn't high enough. If I was fined by income, the fine would be higher and I would feel the 'pain' of the fine and would fix the problem/my behavior.
Embezzlement is literally stealing of course it's morally wrong. If you steal/embezzle enough from a rich business owner that the loss forces that person to shut down the business and not pay the employees due to the money being stolen, then clearly you hurt others who aren't rich. OR what about the classic example of embezzlement which is a county treasurer stealing city funds meant for a public school system.
we should be thankfull for Shinsta being the Staz of Ellie
thx shinsta
So if you take apart someone's Xbox without their permission, and then put it back together and there's no damage, then you probably haven't committed a criminal action, but you probably have committed the civil tort of trespass to chattels.
Taking more than you're allowed from a candy bowl on Halloween is technically theft, since you only have permission to take a certain amount, but good luck getting a prosecutor to take the case.
Embezzlement isn't just a crime that hurts rich people, people have embezzled from school districts and retirement funds, etc.
Technicaly they didn't BREAK anything, assuming they didn't ruin any parts during disassembly. So it's more of just infringement, than outright property destruction.
The 360 worked before the party, it didn't afterward. I'd definitely call that broken.
There is a zero percent chance that he didn't snap the plastic tabs that hold the top and bottom pieces of the outer shell and the scratch the mother board trying to take the x clamps off. Also does that dude just walk around with a t9 torx screwdriver bit all of the time? If not he actually just smashed the Xbox on the ground as hard as he could for the love of vandalism and criminal damage and now he's playing the "I wanted to know how it worked" card.
I'm going to assume he brought screwdriver or something similar to a party if this is more of a one time action. @@idontknowleavemealoneplease
That is just like what Vedal did at that one party that he said he went to where he just did the Coding challenge thing the entire time lmao 🤣
These two are good together, welcome to the Vtuber world Alex void!
>Jaywalking is not morally wrong
Well...
It can potentially endanger young children who are better off seeing everyone around them looking left, right etc, using pedestrian crossings and obeying street lights, rather than jaywalkers, potentially making them think running across he street is the way to go, and potentially getting hurt over it.
Not jaywalking technically is a part of 'village raises the child'.
To be fair, you'd have to teach the car drivers to obey signals and rules of the road too. Too many people die on crosswalks and signaled intersections because the signals are awful or the drivers just blast through a crosswalk with right on red while running someone over.
Teach the operator of the multi ton fast moving weapon first.
If the kid is old enough that are allowed to cross the street without supervision espeshally withouck checking before hand then that's just darwinism stopping the parenting test early cuz how hard they failed at it
On the plus side, 360 hard drives are super easy to swap. So they shouldnt have lost any data.
The original sin was buying the Xbox in the first place.
About embezzlement, etc. of course they need to be punished, what a silly idea, rich people can just do what they want ? Is that the signal we want to give as a society ?
But if you steal a bread because you can't feed yourself because you are poor you go to jail ?
I think countries like Switzerland have the right idea: the punishment depends on how much wealth you have, the more wealth the bigger the fine, etc. Because then everyone feels the pain of the punishment equally.
Does that mean I got less hard of the punishment if I can prove I am poor?
Punishment has to be handed it equally regardless or how rich or poor they are. Nobody gets sent to jail because they stole a loaf of bread. On the other hand, if they broke a window or threatened someone with a weapon to get the bread then they are going to jail.
Switzerland is attempting to use their punishment as a deterrent. However, they are punishing people based on their financial success rather than the actual crime. If the crime is so low that you're only getting a fine then it really shouldn't matter. Especially since many of these fines are methods of generating income for the government rather than actual deterrents.
@@randallsanchez3161 Simple example: I have had a fine for a broken light, I don't care, I just keep driving (where I'm driving it doesn't really matter much for safety, mostly during the day anyway), the fine isn't high enough. If I was fined by income, the fine would be higher and I would feel the 'pain' of the fine and would fix the problem/my behavior.
i am sure the thumbnail xbox was an xbox original
Embezzlement is literally stealing of course it's morally wrong. If you steal/embezzle enough from a rich business owner that the loss forces that person to shut down the business and not pay the employees due to the money being stolen, then clearly you hurt others who aren't rich. OR what about the classic example of embezzlement which is a county treasurer stealing city funds meant for a public school system.
NaIce
Man, depending on the model of 360, I'd put it back together. It's really not that hard.
I took mine apart just to clean it.
@xman5393 I don't like the slim models, I always feel like I'm breaking them 😕.