Where Is The Third Temple? | Bob Cornuke
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2024
- Our Website: www.hellohopec...
-Read more about B.A.S.E. Institute:
Website: bit.ly/3IhUAd1
Instagram: bit.ly/3tdPZnN
Facebook: bit.ly/3tfRsdd
Twitter: bit.ly/3MWhZ7e
TH-cam: bit.ly/34LQsEe
New to Jesus? bit.ly/3doX3WW
Need Prayer?: bit.ly/3antALh
Donate: bit.ly/3alkgHS
-Follow us on Social Media:
Instagram | / hopecityaz
Facebook | / hopecityaz
Thank you for watching! LIKE, SHARE & SUBSCRIBE For More!
#BobCornuke #ThirdTemple #HopeCity #HelloHopeCity #Hope #ChooseHope #HopeForAnyone #HopeHasAName #CityOfHope
![[UNCUT] “อภิสิทธิ์” ครม.อุ๊งอิ๊ง แย่งเก้าอี้กันฝุ่นตลบ “ทักษิณ” บงการเอง Iคนดังนั่งเคลียร์I 21ส.ค.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/a_b-kItw2jY/mqdefault.jpg)
Jesus bless you Mr.Bob Cornuke and keep you from all evil.
In the Book of Acts the apostle Paul was being assaulted at the temple and the text says soldiers from Fort Antonia "came down" taking Paul into custody.... With the direction of travel recorded in the Bible one can know soldiers could not come down if the temple was located at the summit of Mt Moriah.... Shalom and Maranatha!
Excellent point! I think that the third temple has already been built by King Herod and it was the one destroyed in 70 AD. King Herod was a "type" of the Antichrist - the dragon whose tail swept across the heavens and threw a third of "the stars" to the earth (the stars being the "sons of God" i.e. "the innocents", the babies of Judaea that Herod had slaughtered.) He also is who persecuted the woman who fled into the desert - Joseph and Mary with their Child, the Messiah. If we are to take the Scriptures seriously and genuinely accept their authority, then we can't ignore that John records that the Jews stated that it took 46 years for Herod's Temple to be built. The temple that Cyrus had funded (the 2nd Temple) only took around seven years to build, so clearly these are distinctly two different Temples. John 2:19-21 records "Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” The Jews then said, “It took forty-six years to build this temple, and will You raise it up in three days?” But He was speaking of the temple of His body."
This is excellent. Have shared this with family. I have read your book Bob and purchased your book for my sister. Also, I have studied this subject intently. Once we know where the temple was located then we will know where the actual crucification took place. And other events like the sacrifice of Isaac. Almighty God has preserved the real locations from idolatry! Please all...be good Bereans and study these things to see if they be so! Many blessings. Susan
God bless you, Dr Cornuke. I love how you use scripture during your teachings. I thank you.
Bible Verses linked together as a Puzzle - AMAZING REVELATION !
Bob is fabulous in presentation -
Chuck Smith would be so Proud !
❤une belle visite des nouvelles fouilles en français: th-cam.com/video/5Oly26J1Bgg/w-d-xo.html
WOW! I'm shell shocked. Thank you thank you thank you. God bless you.
May Bob Cornuke live to one hundred and twenty.
Absolutely fantastic and fascinating First Thessalonians 5:21
Hi mr Bob i love what you are doing.
I'm totally agree with Bob's. Both temples, Salomon and the second temples where in David City. Among the reasons cited, the strongest one is the water flowing. It is neccesary not only to wash animal blood all the time in order to maintain the place clean but to do all the purification rites! We must to Remember that the dome rock area have NOT any water at all.
So, the third temple could be started tomorrow. then, ¿Why the modern (actual time) temple have not started to build? ¿Who are the people that are interested in the NOT building the temple?
¿Would be that people the beast itself?
Stay Blessed Bob & our Church.Amen. kdag30thAug2022
The Levites would have needed large amounts of fresh, running water to clean the courtyard floor from the huge amount of blood from hundreds of sacrificed animals.
Amazing 👍
My dear Brother Bob, GOD has prepared you for the job of helping with the location of the Temple, HE made you become a very good Detective ' law enforcement Investigator ' , and gave you the special gifts for the purpose.
I am in full agreement with your opinion as to where the Temple is not, and in favor with you as to the possibility of where it belongs,
But please leave preaching and Religious Teachings to those who GOD gave those gifts and anointing for.
Much Blessings in your efforts to bring the truth as to where the Temple was actually constructed.
I believe you're 100 % correct in all that you've explained in your research of where the temple really stood , great work , please keep up the fabulous teaching you're giving out , thank you I truly appreciate what you have to say .
Wonderful that God would allow a Christian to find the original Temple...not the unbelieving Jews. God Bless you Brother...it must of been overwhelming to stand in the original places instead of where the Tour guides lead. Blessings...📖🌷
Exactly, and they still haven't found the true sacrifice and true sabbath........that is in Christ. Amen!!
Its sad that you think Jews are unbelieving and undeserving. No one deserves anything. Not that he found it because he doesn’t know what he is talking about.
EVERY STONE OF THE TEMPLE AND IT’S BUILDINGS WERE THROWN DOWN. NOT ONE STONE LEFT OF THE TEMPLE BUILDINGS.
The following proves Bob Cornuke is correct, based on the testimony of those who lived during the first century.
Fort Antonia Proof:
What did the Roman historian Tacitus say about a "spring of never-failing water" in the temple in section 12 of the passage below? He was a teenager when the temple was destroyed during 70 AD.
The Jews
Book Five (1-13) of The Histories by Tacitus
12. The Temple was like a citadel and had its own walls, which had been even more laboriously and skilfully constructed than the rest. The porticoes around it constituted in themselves an excellent defensive position. To these advantages must be added a spring of never-failing water, chambers cut in the living rock, and tanks and cisterns for the storage of rainwater. Its builders had foreseen only too well that the strange practices of the Jews would lead to continual fighting. Hence everything was available for a siege, however long. Moreover, after Pompey's capture of Jerusalem, fear and experience taught them many lessons. So taking advantage of the money-grubbing instincts of the Claudian period, they purchased permission to fortify the city, and in the days of peace built walls meant for war. Already the home of a motley concourse, its population had been swollen by the fall of the other Jewish cities, for the most determined partisan leaders escaped to the capital, and thereby added to the turmoil. There were three different leaders and three armies. The long outer perimeter of the walls was held by Simon, the central part of the city by John, and the Temple by Eleazar. John and Simon could rely on numbers and equipment, Eleazar on his strategic position. But it was upon each other that they turned the weapons of battle, ambush and fire, and great stocks of corn went up in flames. Then John sent off a party of men, ostensibly to offer sacrifice but in reality to cut Eleazar and his followers to pieces, thus gaining possession of the Temple. Hence-forward, therefore, Jerusalem was divided between two factions, until, on the approach of the Romans, fighting the foreigner healed the breach between them.
==================
In the passage below Josephus reveals Titus used Fort Antonia as his base of operation on the day the temple was burned.
From War of the Jews, by Josephus, Book 6, Chapter 4, sections 4-5.
"4. Now it is true that on this day the Jews were so weary, and under such consternation, that they refrained from any attacks. But on the next day they gathered their whole force together, and ran upon those that guarded the outward court of the temple very boldly, through the east gate, and this about the second hour of the day. These guards received that their attack with great bravery, and by covering themselves with their shields before, as if it were with a wall, they drew their squadron close together; yet was it evident that they could not abide there very long, but would be overborne by the multitude of those that sallied out upon them, and by the heat of their passion. However, Caesar seeing, from the tower of Antonia, that this squadron was likely to give way, he sent some chosen horsemen to support them. Hereupon the Jews found themselves not able to sustain their onset, and upon the slaughter of those in the forefront, many of the rest were put to flight. But as the Romans were going off, the Jews turned upon them, and fought them; and as those Romans came back upon them, they retreated again, until about the fifth hour of the day they were overborne, and shut themselves up in the inner [court of the] temple.
5. So Titus retired into the tower of Antonia, and resolved to storm the temple the next day, early in the morning, with his whole army, and to encamp round about the holy house. But as for that house, God had, for certain, long ago doomed it to the fire; and now that fatal day was come, according to the revolution of ages; it was the tenth day of the month Lous, [Ab,] upon which it was formerly burnt by the king of Babylon; although these flames took their rise from the Jews themselves, and were occasioned by them; for upon Titus’s retiring, the seditious lay still for a little while, and then attacked the Romans again, when those that guarded the holy house fought with those that quenched the fire that was burning the inner [court of the] temple; but these Romans put the Jews to flight, and proceeded as far as the holy house itself. At which time one of the soldiers, without staying for any orders, and without any concern or dread upon him at so great an undertaking, and being hurried on by a certain divine fury, snatched somewhat out of the materials that were on fire, and being lifted up by another soldier, he set fire to a golden window, through which there was a passage to the rooms that were round about the holy house, on the north side of it. As the flames went upward, the Jews made a great clamor, such as so mighty an affliction required, and ran together to prevent it; and now they spared not their lives any longer, nor suffered any thing to restrain their force, since that holy house was perishing, for whose sake it was that they kept such a guard about it."
All of this provides tremendous evidence that the Dome of the Rock is the true location of Fort Antonia. Josephus said Fort Antonia was built upon a gigantic rock, and that rock is still there today.
If Fort Antonia remained on the day the temple was destroyed, please tell us the location of Fort Antonia today?
Where was Solomon anointed as King of Israel, and what is special about the water of the Gihon Spring?
Where was the “tabernacle” at that time?
1Ki_1:33 The king also said unto them, Take with you the servants of your lord, and cause Solomon my son to ride upon mine own mule, and bring him down to Gihon:
1Ki 1:38 So Zadok the priest, and Nathan the prophet, and Benaiah the son of Jehoiada, and the Cherethites, and the Pelethites, went down, and caused Solomon to ride upon king David's mule, and brought him to Gihon.
1Ki 1:39 And Zadok the priest took an horn of oil out of the tabernacle, and anointed Solomon. And they blew the trumpet; and all the people said, God save king Solomon.
1Ki_1:45 And Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet have anointed him king in Gihon: and they are come up from thence rejoicing, so that the city rang again. This is the noise that ye have heard.
Bravo
If you read Josephus aka Ben Jussuf Mathitia you come to the same conclusion the fortress stood where the dome of the rock is. The huge rock is still there. Period.
What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Set Apart Spirit which is in you, which ye have of the Almighty, and ye are not your own? (1 Cor 6:19)
Add the Letter of Aristeas to the evidence. "The whole of the floor is paved with stones and slopes down to the appointed places, that water may be conveyed to wash away the 89 blood from the sacrifices, for many thousand beasts are sacrificed there on the feast days. And there is an inexhaustible supply of water, because an abundant natural spring gushes up from within the temple area. There are moreover wonderful and indescribable cisterns underground, as they pointed out to me, at a distance of five furlongs all round the site of the temple, and each of them has countless pipes 90 so that the different streams converge together. " .... "But in order that we might gain complete information, we ascended to the summit of the neighbouring citadel and looked around us. It is situated in a very lofty spot, and is fortified with many towers, which have been built up to the very top of immense stones, with the object, as we were informed, of 101 guarding the temple precincts, so that if there were an attack, or an insurrection or an onslaught of the enemy, no one would be able to force an entrance within the walls that surround the temple. "
How about this one !!! Where should the 3rd Temp be ???
Bob after Ron Wyatt found the cross holes 30 meters from the garden tomb, I have serious doubts about this crucifixion site. Furthermore, Ron found the Ark of the Covenant with Jesus blood on it in that same area directly below the crosshole, and 6 Jews trying to take the ark out died trying. They found the cheribim etched into the rock in the caves of Heziekiah. Please advise on refuting this scholarship of Ron Wyatt. I would like to tell you from another standpoint, I love your work and appreciate all you do; however, lets get this straight.
Nobody found the Ark of the Covenant. Anybody claim something like this without proof is a liar. Ron Wyatt is a liar.
Couple things, the Romans crucified thousands of people, so there are going to be several holes for several poles all around the place(dozens if not hundreds).........Without DNA testing, how can anyone know, which wood would be Jesus' blood vs someone else's blood?
The House of God is no longer a building made with human hands.
The third temple built by God is in the hearts of men, the permanent temple.
And the living spring flows out of us just like the ghion spring flowed in the original temples.
There is only one man still alive that saw with his own eyes the actual Jewish second temple and likewise he also knows what was it's exact location and he also said that he alone will rebuilt the third temple. That man is Jesus. Let God's son be God's son.
But the Temple they want to build in the last days not the third Solemn Temple,but the Satin Temple.
"But he spake of the temple of his body."
"Jesus Christ being the corner stone, in whom all the building fitly framed together growth unto an holy temple in the Lord."
John 2 & Ephesians 2
Revelation. 21:7
.
The third Temp is nowhere , & it wont be somewhere until they build it somewhere !!!
As for Biblical Archeology, I think that you'd get along with the guy from the Expedition Bible TH-cam Channel as you're both agreeing. However with his TH-cam videos, he records them on site throughout most of the video while your's here is mostly in an auditorium with clips of being on site.
After 3000 years how can you find??
Josephus was granted Romam citizenship
The search for the temple is ongoing. Kind Herod was a builder
even the temple mount. Whatever could be wrong will be. Nimrod construction was in Babylon. Whatelse could it be?
Very interesting program. I think you’re correct. The temple was not where most people think it was. Richard in Dallas
Lots of helpful information here and mixed in with false doctrine about heaven and hell. Also Jeremiah 26:18 shows the dome of the rock is not it.
Is there a part 2? :) I enjoyed this a lot !
I’m so there with You ! Keep the info coming !!
Thanks Bob great presentation and research traditional views in Christ time traditional views was the priest error.
Wau...This is a revolutionary truth! Thank you for posting this revoltionary proof! Soli Deo Gloria!
Mr Bob i want to know something about the tombs, the scriptures says the tombs opnend and many bodies of the saints was raised ... what saints were buried there??? Another question is goliaths head also buried there? I love these studf and i have many questions...
What about the old bloke (Simeon)? God told him he would not die until he held the Christ in his arms, so every day he waited for Him at the Temple, then Joseph and Mary came to dedicate the boy at the Temple, and he held the boy and gave thanks unto God, him and his wife rejoiced, both died happy! There's two saints for you bro, plenty more that died during His 33 yrs life and ministry. Golgotha, place of the skull, yeah David buried goliaths head there, Messiah head crushing satan, bless God forever!
Revelation 14:13. Read it CAREFULLY. Just one of many hidden keys about the NT. Resurrection in the NT is the new birth as noted thru out scripture. Much of the gospels were written as spiritual allegory and you must find the hidden keys. Matthew 11:25. The truth is hidden.
You need to do more reserch,and ask God for revelation!
been listening and watching bob for years. why wont anyone listen to him about the temple? Israel could really rock the world by building the third temple now in the right place with no interference! You have to watch his video on mount sinai too - crazy good! I do have a question thought... It is my understanding that Jews did not do cremation so who did the tombs belong to? I would have though they would be israeli. Can someone help with this? :0)
They can’t build the temple there because its the wrong location.
And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all THESE THINGS? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. Sorry for caps but Jesus and the disciples in all three versions of this passage are talking about the 1st century temple. This places the rest of the chapter in the first century.
The 10th Roman Legion was NOT garrisoned at Jerusalem until AFTER 70 AD. Get your facts straight.
66 AD. The x legion saved Vespasian.
Mat 27:50 Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost.
Mat 27:51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;
Mat 27:52 And the graves were opened; and MANY BODIES OF THE SAINTS WHICH SLEPT AROSE,
Mat 27:53 AND CAME OUT OF THE GRAVES AFTER HIS RESURRECTION, and went into the holy city, AND APPEARED UNTO MANY.
@rls26101
0 seconds ago
I wish you people would stop pushing for a new place to build the Holy Temple instead of where it belongs, atop Temple Mount!
what if you build a scale model of the third temple? and drop it by parachute? my jest.
******* BEWARE OF FALSE TEACHERS *******
Dozens of "mikveh" found around Temple Mount... what for, a bath for the roman soldiers? hahaha
With all due respect Bob I disagree with your opinion for the following reasons. There was NO Roman Legions stationed in Jerusalem before the Jewish Revolt in 66 AD. Before the revolt there was a cohort of 600 men stationed in Jerusalem. In the first revolt it is said that the Jews rose up and expelled the Romans from Jerusalem. If in fact the Temple Mount was a Roman fort with an entire LEGION of troops there do you REALLY think that the Jews could have expelled them from Jerusalem without a MASSIVE siege lasting for more than a year? Roman forts were designed to resist a siege yet there is NO MENTION of an entire Roman Legion getting massacred in Jerusalem at the start of the war.
2nd Chronicles tells us that the TABERNACLE NOT THE TEMPLE was in the city of David. Solomon started construction of the Temple on Mount Moriah in the city of Jerusalem and that once construction was completed the Jewish elders brought the Ark of the covenant out of the city of David and up to the temple and placed it in the holy of holies.
There were aqueducts and pumps that brought water up to the temple mount and that just the daily activity of drawing water out and pumping it back into the cisterns would have kept the water from stagnating.
That temple site they discovered predates the first temple so it is in no way connected to either the first or second temple. It could be the Melchizdekc temple though.
The fortress of Antonia was NOT BUILT BY THE ROMANS. It was built by King Herod and given to the Romans as a barracks for the cohort stationed in Jerusalem. So the fact that the temple mount is of similar dimensions to a Roman Legionary encampment is coincidence.
Your claims about the crucifixion site is WILD speculation with zero evidence to support it. If you compare the accounts of Jesus arrest and trial with a map of first century Jerusalem you will see that ALL the places mentioned, the Praetorium, Herod Antipas's palace and High Priest Caiaphas's house are ALL located in the south western quarter of Jerusalem. The Praetorium is right next to the Gennath Gate where Jesus was led from the city and the crucifixion site at the Church of the Holy Sepulture is a short walk too to AND is at the intersection of two major roads. All the super natural nonsense like the curtain of the temple tearing and graves opening are not mentioned ANYWHERE outside of the bible so reading them as if they are evidence is laughable. The Romans are far more likely to have crucified Jesus at the spot of the Church of the Holy Sepulture because of its location in proximity to the Praetorium, the administrative offices and residence of Pontius Pilot and the fact that it was at the intersection of two major roads which the Romans liked to do to post a warning to passers by a warning to what happens to people to violate Roman law. There are multiple 1st century Jewish tombs on the site showing that the area was used for burials in Jesus time.
May I suggest you look up the Letter of Aristeas. "But in order that we might gain complete information, we ascended to the summit of the neighbouring citadel and looked around us. It is situated in a very lofty spot, and is fortified with many towers, which have been built up to the very top of immense stones, with the object, as we were informed, of 101 guarding the temple precincts, so that if there were an attack, or an insurrection or an onslaught of the enemy, no one would be able to force an entrance within the walls that surround the temple." There findings that Mr. Cornuke presents match the descriptions of this letter from 3rd or early 2nd century BC.
Acts 23/23
Gotta' give Ron Wyatt the credit he deserves so I am doing that here, he found it all first.
I'm trying to sync up with Bob here but he seems a bit' too motivated to become famous for my taste. Ron on the other hand was a humble man more interested in God's will concerning all of this.
Interesting work though.
R.W. was exceptional and able to put pieces of the Biblical puzzle together. I have heard and seen evidence saying the Temple was in the City of David quite awhile back , an as more of the City has been excavated more has been revealed. First BIG clue is the Gihon Spring. Yes , the stubborn ones cling to a Retaining Wall of a Roman Fortress. I would go so far as calling it an IDOL in their eyes.
Ron gathered his information that was available BEFORE him. Many people already knew these sites existed.
@@RoseSharon7777 Who knew where the Ark was located before Ron found it? Please site a source.
@@SirtubalotTX Theres no evidence Ron found the ark. No true pictures and others who have refuted that story.
@@RoseSharon7777 There is plenty of evidence along with Ron's and other testimonies from other people. Where have you been?
If the 2nd Temple was located in the City of David, the cubit used would be only 6 inches. Also, did you know that there were over 30 cisterns and 1 fixed well located on the Temple Mount?
do you have support for these assertions? and the point is LIVING WATER! not human provided luke warm water!!
⚡️
👑
love,
david
just find the threshing floor!
@@seed_of_the_woman My sources are:
"Below The Temple Mount In Jerusalem: A Sourcebppk on the cisterns and subterranean chambers and conduits of the Haram Al-Sharif" by Shimon Gibson and David M Jacobson.
Researchers of the temple mount in
the 1800’s for the PEF
1. James Barclay
2. Ermete Piero`
3. Melchior de Vogue
4. Captain Charles Warren
5. Conrad Schick
6. Claude Reignier Conder
7. Sir Charles Wilson
Many of these men were Royal Engineers of England. Warren and Wilson discovered and mapped 37 cisterns and Schick discovered and mapped 34 cisterns. All located on the Temple Mount. And one of these cisterns is actually a working well. I even have topographical graphs and drawings of their locations.
In Jerusalem after the great earthquake,there will be a high place there and the great mosque was destroyed.
Fort Antonia wasn’t a Roman fort and it wasn’t a full legion he is cherry-picking a miss translation.
"Not one stone" referred to the buildings! Jesus was not talking about the retaining walls. Also, Josephus said that Titus destroyed the foundations of the Antonia Fortress during the siege. The retaining walls there today could NOT have been the Antonia Fortress.
They can't be the Temple. Historians say there was no trace of the Temple left. It had become a field and was plowed.
It will be in the city of David
@14:10’temple
I like some of his claims, despite the fact that he plagiarized in several areas, mainly against Ron Wyatt. but I don't intend to prove him right or wrong, because like I said I like some of his findings and would like to give him credits for putting the effort in biblical archaeology. With that said, I just wanted to point out one false claim of his, and anyone can reason for yourselves. His proposed location of the crucifixion being toward the east of the temple is based on false reasoning. He used Matthew 27: 54, by "saw the things that had happened" it at best only suggests that the centurions saw the tombs open, veil/curtain torn, a suggestion does not equal fact. plus, reason for yourself, THE VEIL WAS INSIDE THE TEMPLE. No one outside, from any direction could have seen it. That's pretty much the only reason he placed the location of crucifixion toward the east, and it was based on false reasoning. there is another proposed crucifixion location and the Ark of the Covenant proposed by Ron Wyatt's which lies north of the temple mount. I am not saying that Wyatt is right, but his proposed location and artifacts sound more convincing.
Jesus prayed to the One God, not himself.
Exactly. He was anointed BY GOD. Acts 10. He is elohim not Elohim. As are all begotten sons. I Peter 1:3, 1:21, James 1:18, Rev. 21:7. All the firstborn of YHWHs incorruptible seed.
@@RoseSharon7777 Yahweh doesn't have children. Yahweh created the heavens and the earth. Yahweh is omniscient, omnipotent and eternal. Why would Yahweh have children?
Many blessings from Greece.
What if the temple refered to the scriptures is Hagia Sofia and not Solomons Temple?
"Where the Romans built their fort." Another error - HEROD built the fortress, NOT the Romans....
I know your right
I don’t know where Evangelicals get off thinking they are supposed to take over the Jews Temple. Are you going to build a new Vatican for the Catholics?
Ears to hear
There will be TWO TEMPLES . One in old Jerusalem and one in new Jerusalem , Independence Missouri , where the Garden of Eden was located .
No. New Jerusalem is in Ukraine.
There was water on the Temple Mount
North east cornor
Hezekiah
Hezekiah
Blocked the fountains and the brook
Read verses before and after
2 kings18 : 17
And they went up and came to Jerusalem. And when they were come up , they came and stood by the (conduit )of the (upper pool) , which is in the highway of the Fuller’s field.
2 Chronicles 32 : 3-4
3. He took counsel with his princes and his mighty mento (stop the water) of the(fountains) which were without the city and they did help him
4. So there was gathered much people together, , who (stopped all the (fountains) and Brook that ran through) the (midst or (Middle)of the land , saying why should the Kings of Assria come, and Find Water .
2 Chronicles 33 : 30
30. This Same Hezekiah (also Stopped ) The upper watercourse (Conduit) against King Amon.
He is correct there is no water but rain water was collected and aqueducts brought water from Bethleham.
I have a feeling that a whole bunch of these naysayers are going to be very surprised here in a few months. 😊
When they discover most of the NT for us living in the last generation is fulfilled spiritually not literally. The temple, the living water, the crucifixion, the resurrection, the burial, the new Adam, the miracle new birth, the tombs, the spiritual body, My. Zion, the holy city, the land, etc. it has nothing to do with a literal place in the middle east.
God charged humanity with sin of Adam and Eve and killed his only begotten son, a god, to remove that sin??? Does that make any sense??? This is the definition of ridiculous concept and shows God cannot forgive without human/divine sacrifice. This is not the definition of justice and/or God.
BOB did not discover REAL MT SINAI--Ron Wyatt and then JIM AND PENNY Caldwell did yrs before bob even went over there(scammer)
Go see the other material that refutes this with archeology. I thought this was convincing until the facts were laid out.
Poor Palestinians , killed and beaten for lies .
May God bless Bob's days ... but the poor guy is dead, dead, dead wrong ... There is at least a hundred things he is not telling people who don't know. And he doesn't even go into the practical things about why the temple was absolutely not where he would like scripture interpretation to place it ... Beside that, Fort Antonia was already there before the Roman's. They did not build it. Ptolemy built it. Herod improved on it for the Roman army.. But that's historical fact ... Also, Solomon built a six miles long aqueduct from Hebron Valley, where the Solomons Resevoirs are to this day. That aqueduct goes STRAIGHT TO THE TEMPLE MOUNT and does not branch off. It fills the million gallon cisterns under the temple site... and provided non stop flowing water, under pressure, to wash away the blood of the massive sacrifice over hundreds of years of use ... The cisterns are the key. And they date to that time period.
You're understanding of the crucifixion is flawed. If Jesus died to pay our sin debt, eternal death, then he would still be dead. Thats the price i would have to pay on judgement day, eternal death. Plus the Passover lamb was not a sin offering. Plus it refutes the point of the pasover death angel. He delivers us from death. As noted in hebrews 5:7, Psalm 18, 41, 91. People have misunderstood the gospels for over 1800 years.
No one can pay for your inquity. You must crucify your own flesh and crush Satan's head (carnal nature). Then YOU will become a begotten Son of YHWH. Rev. 21:7 who will sit on YHWHS throne Judging the nations (0eople) in righteous judgement. Rev. 3:21.
Your logic is flawed. Jesus paid our debt and was resurrected! Praise be to the One Holy God! We will be with Him. The bride Of Christ.
@@hntr92005vallot what is the wages for your sins? On judgement day? All the lost will perish right. So if Jesus paid that debt for you then that means he paid your ETERNAL DEATH FEE. That means he would still be dead. Its called critical thinking skills. Required when reading the Bible. Everyone must repent for their own sins. The Father will forgive us by his grace and mercy.
@@RoseSharon7777he rose from the death because when HE die he was dead because of our sin and God give HIM life back
@@Jesus_ismyLordandsavior sorry friend. That contradicts ALL the OT and NT. You must repent for your own sins and the Father will have mercy and grace to you. If you return to him he will return to you. Ezekiel 18. No blood sacrifice ever paid or covered willful sins. If so then there was never ever any need for repentance. God hated the feast days, new moons and SACRIFICES and he desired only mercy. Have you ever actually ever read the bible? The prodigal son parable, Zacheus, the woman caught in adultery, etc were not required to sacrifice anything but their own will to be forgiven. The crucifixion story and the nativity story and resurrection story are spiritual ALLEGORY. The virgin daughter of Zion is not a woman named Mary and the only miracle conception is when a sinner repents and is begotten of the Fathers incorruptible seed. The only miracle birth is when sinners are born of YHWH the Father. YOU are supposed to be a literal Son of God. Rev. 21:7, Rev. 3:21. His firstborn of his spirit like Paul told you. This is the resurrection from death into new life. Youve already been found worthy! But not if you keep worshipping a man as God. Jesus was human just like you. He was born of the same spirit all sons are. Clearly stated in Romans 1:3-4, Romans 8:11. There's no such thing as a God-man. Antithetical to ALL scripture. May I suggest you read Deut 13 carefully!
God made it clear, thru out scripture who he was, is, and always will be, and he NEVER changes. He is not a man. Hosea 11:9. He comes to regenerate your dead spirit. So you too are dual natured. Human nature and a God nature. It wasn't only Jesus chosen to be anointed. You are supposed to be anointed that goes out to save the lost. James 5:20. By offering your life as a sacrifice for others. That doesn't make you a God-man nor did it for Jesus. It makes us divine elohim not The Elohim. Knowing the original language is imperative in finding wisdom.
"I even I am YHWH besides ME there is NO SAVIOR". Isaiah 43:11.
" Put NOT your trust in Princes nor the SON OF MAN in whom there is NO SALVATION" Psalm 146:3.
The Catholic church has deceived the masses for over 1800 years as well as the Protestant churches. Blind guides. They corrupted and stamped out the truth and used a false image of messiah to lead you into apostasy. God did not become a man thru a pagan virgin birth. HIS PEOPLE perish for lack of knowledge. I pray you start over in Genesis and use a lexicon. The English Bible is highly mistranslated.
Jer 16:19-21 KJV or Hebrew. The gentiles are deceived until the day of affliction when the Father opens their eyes that have been blinded by false doctrine and they will all know his name is YHWH not Jesus. Jesus told us to worship the Father and HIM ONLY shall we serve. 1st commandment never changed. Matthew 4:10.
@@RoseSharon7777Acts 2:24: "But God raised him up, having freed him from death, because it was impossible for him to be held in its power."
Absolutely wrong...
Why say?
@@user-ce1ch1oq9r Cornuke is total fiction. Read Temple Revealed by Widener. This is a logical study. Ultimately, when the Temple Institute starts building 3rd Temple we'll see the Dome of the Rock in the Outer court of the 3rd Temple as scripture says...for that's reserved for gentiles.
Totally wrong!
Only a fool would believe this heresy. BEWARE 0F FALSE TEACHINGS. THIS HAS BEEN DISPROVEN AND LAUGHABLE!
Listen again slowly with your bible open.
I hope people know that his theory has zero evidence and the standard theory has the remaining 100%.
That is a laughable statement.
The temple would not have fit where Bob says it was... simple math. There is also ZERO archeological evidence of it in the city of David. I went with Bob on his film expedition to Israel in 2015 to run sound. Bob is a really cool guy, but he's just wrong. His book makes the topic compelling, but the evidence just isn't there. Look into Gabi Barkai and the Temple Mount Sifting Project, there is overwhelming evidence that the temple is right where it has been know since very early on in Judeo and Christian church history.
No He is very right. Read Matthew 21 and 24 . No one stone will remain on each other, this wall called in Arabic Almabka wall, for what , do you know ?
Cite the biblical source for it not fitting.
I won't attend any church that has a band... a set of drums on the stage??? How blasphemous.
So I guess tap dancing is out.
like#101
Ask God for discernment and revelation.
Jesus was always in the choppy waters. Pharisees didn't like that.