Mahler - Symphony no. 5 Adagietto - Score Analysis

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @KyussWhitewater
    @KyussWhitewater หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have never before seen a jazz-style harmonic analysis over a piece of classical music. Clear and thorough explanation. Thank you!

  • @composer7325
    @composer7325 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is brilliant, thank you so much for this magnificent analysis.

  • @febilogi
    @febilogi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Wow, your analysis is going to the next level. I love it! Thanks for sharing 😊 really enjoy reading your analysis.

  • @MichaelPigneguy
    @MichaelPigneguy ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fantastic to see this! Looking forward to learning a lot from your analysis!

  • @realillusion1220
    @realillusion1220 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's not boring at all! Very exciting! Thank you

  • @grundvater
    @grundvater ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sehr schönes Werk und eine gute Analyse.

  • @pelegribernial4741
    @pelegribernial4741 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Una meravella de analisis.......Congratulations

  • @dimikireeff
    @dimikireeff ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi, Bruno, nice form analysis and beautiful graphic organization. Thank you for sharing. On the Harmonic side, I think I caught a misinterpretation: when the upper staff change to bass clef, I'm afraid you continued reading as it was treble clef. So, the F/E would actually be A-/E, and so on. Take a look there. Greetings.

    • @gzanghi2736
      @gzanghi2736 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      pretty sure its a Neapolitan 6 chord (bII6)

  • @jean-xf9mv
    @jean-xf9mv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks Bruno for this very helpful content you are posting. while i was checking this analysis, i noticed a tiny notation mistake, measure 81, the G should be noted G- ( there is Bb in it and as well i was surprised because it sounds really minor ).

    • @brunoroblesrendon
      @brunoroblesrendon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yup that was my mistake, you can actually see that in the Roman numeral I wrote it as minor but I must have had a slip of mind writing the chord symbol.

    • @jean-xf9mv
      @jean-xf9mv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@brunoroblesrendon when i see the quality of your analysys (the best on youtube for me) i have no doubt that you can spot the difference between a maj and min chord :)
      i want to thank you again for your work, it really helps me. i studied jazz harmony in conservatory but never studied classical music even though i love this music as well.
      i wish one day you analyse pieces wich contain both functional and non functional harmony ( maybe early shoenberg Transfigured night, or some Ravel, or Debussy, i dont know...) i always thought that Debussy was already using more modality (vs tonality) but your analysis of Arabesque proved me wrong. i am fascinated by this period where tonal harmony become more elusive and the chord changes are more surprising and rich, while in same time very coherent. i find hard to get informations about these types of harmony. some modern jazz is on this subtle frontier , i try to compose this way, but i need more material and theory to study.

    • @brunoroblesrendon
      @brunoroblesrendon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@jean-xf9mv Thanks for the kind words.
      I do plan to later to analyze less tonal music. I just need to find the time, I've been very busy lately and I'm currently working on analyzing another film theme.

  • @RenardeauGuy
    @RenardeauGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good work

  • @aquestnohies
    @aquestnohies ปีที่แล้ว

    Congrats, but measure 16 this F/E should be an A minor...

    • @gzanghi2736
      @gzanghi2736 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No, thats definitely a Neopolitan 6 chord (bII6)