that guy from the incredibles movie was saying that if everyone has super powers, that means super powers is the norm/regular state of affairs. when you look at his motivations as a context for the statement, it's fairly clear that's what the intended message was supposed to be. i.e. everyone becomes normal and no one is exceptional from a super powers perspective. it's not the same as saying "if everyone has legs, no one has legs" instead it's more "if everyone has legs, having legs is normal"
@@matth2283 fair point. Although idolization really should come from actions not innate characteristics... well I say that, but idolization isn't really a virtue in the first place
If everybody has super powers, they are not super anymore. They are normal powers. Super only come when it is relatively better to something . "if everybody has legs. no body has legs is a pretty bad example, as there is no comparative here". It is in same way as there cant be a room full of alphas.
Thank you , i honestly dont even know how you couldnt understand what syndrome meant... He was envious that the person he admired thought they were better than him because they had super powers and thus saying if everyone was super (aka had super powers) then there wouldn't be anything that made mr incredible better than anyone. The og statmenet if every ability is an ultimate then no ability is an ultimate basically holds as this implies no ability is superior to any of your other abilities
@@lourensmalan2431 well, im clueless if you are being sarcastic but im also saying that if every ability is an ultimate ability in a game mode. All of them are just normal abilities.
Actually, super and ultimate both imply a greater version of normal. The definition of ultimate is the best achievable or imaginable of its kind. It is paradoxical for multiple things to fit this definition, therefore if everything is ultimate nothing is ultimate. Super does have more wiggle room in its definition, not requiring there to be a singular, exclusive super thing. I personally believe that if the majority fits the definition of super, it is also paradoxical. I see this as defining a scale, where super is more than 5/10. If everyone is more than 5/10, then 1 and ten must be redefined, making everyone 5/10 again. (my opinion) Ultimately, it's contextual and subjective. Because the game is designed with basic abilities and ultimates, if you consider the abilities in this mode to be in the context of a normal game, yes, they are all ultimate. However, in the context of this individual game, all abilities (excepting imbalances) are equal and not ultimate. Only average.
The whole "If everyone super nobody is super." argument i disagree with. Cause I feel the way he means is like it gets rid special part of supers. Like its the idea that if say you have a rock that no one else has, and people think higher of you cause of that rock, but then everyone gets the same rock. Is it really special anymore? Sure everyone has the rock still, but there isnt as big of a worth on that rock now.
It's because of the phrasing in that sentence, cuz yeah, it wrong to think that "everybody is super so no one is" but what it really means, as you said, is basically: "if everybody super then it becomes the new normal" because the inequality between supes and normals is no longer present. That's what that phrase means in that context, Syndrome is a normal that was tired of this injustice. Much like a communist. Baumi, I'm disappointed :(
While yes, the argument meant something like "if everybody is unique, nobody is" because to be unique you need someone normal to compare with... but Boomi argument is also true, because his argument based on having a third point of view who has a concept of what is unique. An example to this, let's say there is an art exhibition where every piece of art there is unique. Just because every art there is unique doesn't makes none of them are unique, because the third point of view which is the viewer in the exhibition has the concept of unique and through that he/she can come to a conclusion that every piece of art in the exhibition was indeed unique. To put it on Savory Doggo's comparison. If every single person in the world got a diamond, does that makes diamond worthless? No, its still a shiny gem which looks better as a ring compared to a rock.
@@birifumi using unique as a counter example is bad since unique just implies different , syndromes qoute doesnt state that if everyone is diffrrent no one is as that would be stupid the statement means that if no one had an advantage over someone else then everyone would be on equal footing. The sentance that started this aka: if everythings and ultimate then nothing is holds as it basically means if none of your abilities are considered better than the others than none of them can be considered an ultimate ... You're if everyone has a diamond example actually prooves the point. If you gave 10 people a diamond then those 10 people would have something that no one else has , but if you gave the world a diamond then no one would have something special.
@@lourensmalan2431 exactly, this sentence doesn't apply to everything! It only applies to things that create a significant difference between two persons, like superpowers... Or being filthy rich... But that doesn't take the value of the thing itself, a superpower isn't less than a superpower if everyone has one, it's just that if everyone has one, everyone is on an even field(ignoring the difference between superpowers)
Having all abilities ultimates doesn't make you better than anyone else if everyone also has them, then what defines if you're better is both the ultimates themselves and your skill using them, which is a tiny bit more fair then you having all ultimates and me having only one!
@@r-squared9355 this is the time when Baumi plays CHC a lot, and one of the viewer in his chat type in "If you play CHC again I'm going to ____ you" types joke, and yeah, mad is an understatement at that point and oh boi after that video I kinda, afraid, of Baumi. But I understand why he would react in such a way.
Hes not "self righteous" hes a good dude who is always trying to be better and do better. You have a very small view of humanity if you think people try to pull the best out of others is something to look down on.
@@helderfelix5546 Are you referring to anything in particular? He seems pretty chill about his opinions, not forcing them on others and open to criticism
@@helderfelix5546 I've been watching him for years, long before chroma I get what your referring to but I honestly believe he speaks his mind in a positive way and is never condescending or self righteous
In the context of both movies yndrom was actually pointing to the serious issue of inequality in the society in that story. His solution was good but being evil was totaly unnesesary :D
I mean, if everyone could fly, there would be flight traffic police monitoring speed limits, regional flight paths you wouldn't be allowed to stray off of, and you would still have to carry your stuff.
I have to say, the Incredibles villain is somewhat correct. Because you would be changing what is considered normal; thus everyone having a superpower would become normal; so all super powers would be changed to normal powers. In order for someone to thus be 'super', they would have to have a power that exceeds other powers by a significant margin. You'd be correct if the definition of what normal is stayed the same, but by changing the very foundation of what normal actually 'means' then everything previously super is just 'regular'. Imagine if you removed any form of violence except for nukes; then normal fighting would be 'fire the nukes'. In essence, you would change the definition of fighting to be so much worse that anyone who even jokes about fighting might very well be ostracized and maybe even put in jail just for mentioning the word fighting. 'Everyone has legs, so no one has legs' is a bit different than 'if everyone is super, no one will be super'. To start with, everyone having legs is already the 'normal' by giving everyone who doesn't have legs, you are not changing the definition of what it means to have legs. On the other hand, if you say that 'everyone will have super-legs, so no one will have super legs' then you are changing the definition of what a leg is: everyone will have legs that... run two hundred miles per hour for example. Thus, that is now the normal. In order to have a set of super-legs, you would have to exceed the new definition of normal. In this example, the new definition of normal might be a set of legs that goes a thousand miles per hour. In essence, the villain wanted to change the definition of normal in such a way that the current super-heroes would just be regular heroes; police officers, firemen, doctors/nurses, etc, etc. Because they would be normalized, the previously 'super' heroes would lose the thing that made them special: the thing that the villain was denied as a child. Not by making it so no one could reach the heights of being a superhero, but by raising everyone to the height of a super hero; and thus removing the difference in height. After all, a super hero is someone to be looked up to and someone to get the autograph of like a celebrity... but you pass police officers on the street every day and never really think anything of it. Think of the sentence like this: if everyone is six feet tall, no one can be considered taller than average because the average is six feet tall and everyone is six feet tall.
On the whole "if everyone is super, then no one is super" from the incredibles, the way I view it is that it's really a statement about how messed up Syndrome's view of the world is. Because this statement always makes sense IF you are talking about competition. Then in that case yes, if you give everyone an advantange then you have effectively given nobody an advantage. But that is Syndrome's problem; this statement that he makes DOES make sense to him BECAUSE he views everything, even being a hero and saving lives, as a competition. And consequently, he needs to prove himself the best, even at the cost of others
"if everybody's super then no one's super" is only true if you consider the main upside of superpowers to be both the power that you hold over people and the way that that power creates a social hierarchy with you at the top. IMO people who say that publicly are making a pretty horrifying condemnation of themselves.
And having a rare thing makes you stand out the most. Generally superpowers are just rare in the context of movies and it makes it stand out but if everyone has a superpower, then it doesn't stand out. Heck in the normal world, having 1 or no legs make you stand out
Nope, would you consider drinking water a super power? no, why? everyone can do it, the SUPER part in super power indicates that its OVER normal powers, normal powers are the powers that are the NORM, if only a few people could drink water then drinking water would be a super power, its pretty simple
@@camilog777 That's the thing with superpowers, it's not like everybody will have the same, if it was like that humans would just change and that would become normal for us. But if you think about different types of powers, society would have a social hierarchy around those with good genectics getting the better powers. Not much different from our world right now
So about the super power thing, I guess the way I look at it is that he's not necessarily saying no one has super powers but more along the lines of the fact that the implication is that people with super powers have a special place in society because there are so few and it's so rare, but when everyone has super powers your no longer really considered "special" amongst the masses because everyone has a super power and so therefore you are no longer a rare individual but just another person. it would be just like normal society is right now everyone has something they are good at and can do a bit better than others, but there is bound to be someone better than you at it as well. Like if only you had Supermans powers you would be praised. However if everyone in the world had the power of superman just like you, it's not that you don't have super powers but it's just you are no longer a special rare being amongst the world's people, now you're just like everyone else. That's just how I interpreted what he was saying in the movie anyway idk food for thought I suppose, also just want to say love the vids keep up the greatness!!
Boomi sir, i disagree. The concept of an superpower or ultimate is dependent on the concept of having an average ability. Raising that average to the level of a superhuman ability makes said superhuman ability or ultimate normal. If everybody is 8 feet tall, an 8 feet tall woman/man seems normal to everyone and is not considered special. Superpowers are a bad example in my opinion, because of their variety. Super strength, speed, intelligence… can be achieved on different levels and in different variations, making some combinations special. Example: 1/3 of the population has a combination of super speed and super strenght. Only 1% has an extreme case of superhuman strength making them special or super. In conclusion context is the key. (As it is in most things)
'super' is latin for over, above. A superpower is thus by definition something exceeding the normal standard of powers. Consequently, if everybody suddenly gained abilities like telekinesis, extreme strength, supersonic speed etc., those abilities are only exceeding the level of ability people had before, but not the new reference of what powerlevel common abilities have. So it would practically inacurate to use the term superpowers, because this doesn't serve any distinction anymore. And an ultimate thing is by definition the last, the optimal, the superlative. Thus, if every ability is called an ultimate, this term loses it's meaning. Now, in the context of this mod, there is an intelligible sense in saying every ability is an ultimate, because this is how the authors are trying to convey how abilities are balanced here relative to normal dota, and this isn't meant to become the general norm. But if Dota 3 would balance all abilities evenly and call them all ultimates, that would be pointless.
@@jarcase689 yeah, and his childhood trauma clearly shows that he wants the world to be non depending to supers and he wants to destroy their legacy. I just don't understand why he had to do all the theatrics, when all he has to do is sell his inventions to the public. Like Apple. it would still have the same effect. I mean who wouldn't buy a jetpack!?
So about your "make it later for NA people" idea, I thought I'd mention that your stream normally ends around 5am my time. So it'd have to be a pretty big shift for it to work into schedules here.
If everyone is super then nobody is. This statement is still correct in what it’s trying to say. It doesn’t mean it literally obviously it means if everyone is super then no one is special for having super powers. If everyone has legs no one is special for having legs .
So.. If every human being can walk the same way and at the same speed would that make it a super power? Yeah for a fish that would be but for humans.. Nah
No, in the context of saying "if everyone is super, no one will be" he means that because of the fact that having super powers makes you unique from other people, if everyone has super powers then no one is unique, and therefore no one is super. Your take is just wrong.
Idk man there was that one time we had the capitalism debate when Miki had to come in and calm u down… so idk if you never get angry… I mean I guess you can say most of the time….
that guy from the incredibles movie was saying that if everyone has super powers, that means super powers is the norm/regular state of affairs. when you look at his motivations as a context for the statement, it's fairly clear that's what the intended message was supposed to be. i.e. everyone becomes normal and no one is exceptional from a super powers perspective. it's not the same as saying "if everyone has legs, no one has legs" instead it's more "if everyone has legs, having legs is normal"
ya that guy in the chat must had had no brain at all and baumi himself for no reason brought the meaning of that sentence to its extreme
Yes
Makes me remember my hero academia
@@matth2283 fair point. Although idolization really should come from actions not innate characteristics... well I say that, but idolization isn't really a virtue in the first place
@@matth2283 Perhaps so, but no need to be mean about it. Baumi is a good guy at heart, and seems to mean well
If everybody has super powers, they are not super anymore. They are normal powers. Super only come when it is relatively better to something . "if everybody has legs. no body has legs is a pretty bad example, as there is no comparative here". It is in same way as there cant be a room full of alphas.
Thank you , i honestly dont even know how you couldnt understand what syndrome meant... He was envious that the person he admired thought they were better than him because they had super powers and thus saying if everyone was super (aka had super powers) then there wouldn't be anything that made mr incredible better than anyone. The og statmenet if every ability is an ultimate then no ability is an ultimate basically holds as this implies no ability is superior to any of your other abilities
@@lourensmalan2431 well, im clueless if you are being sarcastic but im also saying that if every ability is an ultimate ability in a game mode. All of them are just normal abilities.
@@saikrishnatunuguntla2876 no im agreeing with you xD
Actually, super and ultimate both imply a greater version of normal. The definition of ultimate is the best achievable or imaginable of its kind. It is paradoxical for multiple things to fit this definition, therefore if everything is ultimate nothing is ultimate. Super does have more wiggle room in its definition, not requiring there to be a singular, exclusive super thing. I personally believe that if the majority fits the definition of super, it is also paradoxical. I see this as defining a scale, where super is more than 5/10. If everyone is more than 5/10, then 1 and ten must be redefined, making everyone 5/10 again. (my opinion)
Ultimately, it's contextual and subjective. Because the game is designed with basic abilities and ultimates, if you consider the abilities in this mode to be in the context of a normal game, yes, they are all ultimate. However, in the context of this individual game, all abilities (excepting imbalances) are equal and not ultimate. Only average.
Can't imagine ursa and spectre in this mode
7:00
Should have answered: "Don't worry about that. I still get the full amount.
I'm scared of Tinker in this mode....
It scares me to imagine venomancer on this game mode
The whole "If everyone super nobody is super." argument i disagree with. Cause I feel the way he means is like it gets rid special part of supers. Like its the idea that if say you have a rock that no one else has, and people think higher of you cause of that rock, but then everyone gets the same rock. Is it really special anymore? Sure everyone has the rock still, but there isnt as big of a worth on that rock now.
It's because of the phrasing in that sentence, cuz yeah, it wrong to think that "everybody is super so no one is" but what it really means, as you said, is basically: "if everybody super then it becomes the new normal" because the inequality between supes and normals is no longer present. That's what that phrase means in that context, Syndrome is a normal that was tired of this injustice. Much like a communist. Baumi, I'm disappointed :(
While yes, the argument meant something like "if everybody is unique, nobody is" because to be unique you need someone normal to compare with... but Boomi argument is also true, because his argument based on having a third point of view who has a concept of what is unique.
An example to this, let's say there is an art exhibition where every piece of art there is unique. Just because every art there is unique doesn't makes none of them are unique, because the third point of view which is the viewer in the exhibition has the concept of unique and through that he/she can come to a conclusion that every piece of art in the exhibition was indeed unique.
To put it on Savory Doggo's comparison. If every single person in the world got a diamond, does that makes diamond worthless? No, its still a shiny gem which looks better as a ring compared to a rock.
@@birifumi using unique as a counter example is bad since unique just implies different , syndromes qoute doesnt state that if everyone is diffrrent no one is as that would be stupid the statement means that if no one had an advantage over someone else then everyone would be on equal footing.
The sentance that started this aka: if everythings and ultimate then nothing is holds as it basically means if none of your abilities are considered better than the others than none of them can be considered an ultimate ...
You're if everyone has a diamond example actually prooves the point. If you gave 10 people a diamond then those 10 people would have something that no one else has , but if you gave the world a diamond then no one would have something special.
@@lourensmalan2431 exactly, this sentence doesn't apply to everything! It only applies to things that create a significant difference between two persons, like superpowers... Or being filthy rich... But that doesn't take the value of the thing itself, a superpower isn't less than a superpower if everyone has one, it's just that if everyone has one, everyone is on an even field(ignoring the difference between superpowers)
Having all abilities ultimates doesn't make you better than anyone else if everyone also has them, then what defines if you're better is both the ultimates themselves and your skill using them, which is a tiny bit more fair then you having all ultimates and me having only one!
6:50 PTSD that one guy who makes a joke about baumi playing CHC too much. my god that ruined my mood soo much
what happened?
@@r-squared9355 this is the time when Baumi plays CHC a lot, and one of the viewer in his chat type in "If you play CHC again I'm going to ____ you" types joke, and yeah, mad is an understatement at that point and oh boi after that video I kinda, afraid, of Baumi. But I understand why he would react in such a way.
Hey boomi, just waiting for the upload, keep up buddy really enjoy these kind of videos, its rly satisfying and relaxing😎😎
Agreed friend
The vids r good, but he himself not so much... His self righteousness is unbearable to say at least
Hes not "self righteous" hes a good dude who is always trying to be better and do better. You have a very small view of humanity if you think people try to pull the best out of others is something to look down on.
@@helderfelix5546 Are you referring to anything in particular? He seems pretty chill about his opinions, not forcing them on others and open to criticism
@@roysheehan8695 maybe you don't follow him for long and didn't notice what I'm pointing
@@helderfelix5546 I've been watching him for years, long before chroma I get what your referring to but I honestly believe he speaks his mind in a positive way and is never condescending or self righteous
Dota 2 but everyone needs to buy cd reduction.
And mana regen
In the context of both movies yndrom was actually pointing to the serious issue of inequality in the society in that story. His solution was good but being evil was totaly unnesesary :D
I mean, if everyone could fly, there would be flight traffic police monitoring speed limits, regional flight paths you wouldn't be allowed to stray off of, and you would still have to carry your stuff.
I have to say, the Incredibles villain is somewhat correct. Because you would be changing what is considered normal; thus everyone having a superpower would become normal; so all super powers would be changed to normal powers. In order for someone to thus be 'super', they would have to have a power that exceeds other powers by a significant margin. You'd be correct if the definition of what normal is stayed the same, but by changing the very foundation of what normal actually 'means' then everything previously super is just 'regular'. Imagine if you removed any form of violence except for nukes; then normal fighting would be 'fire the nukes'. In essence, you would change the definition of fighting to be so much worse that anyone who even jokes about fighting might very well be ostracized and maybe even put in jail just for mentioning the word fighting.
'Everyone has legs, so no one has legs' is a bit different than 'if everyone is super, no one will be super'. To start with, everyone having legs is already the 'normal' by giving everyone who doesn't have legs, you are not changing the definition of what it means to have legs. On the other hand, if you say that 'everyone will have super-legs, so no one will have super legs' then you are changing the definition of what a leg is: everyone will have legs that... run two hundred miles per hour for example. Thus, that is now the normal. In order to have a set of super-legs, you would have to exceed the new definition of normal. In this example, the new definition of normal might be a set of legs that goes a thousand miles per hour.
In essence, the villain wanted to change the definition of normal in such a way that the current super-heroes would just be regular heroes; police officers, firemen, doctors/nurses, etc, etc. Because they would be normalized, the previously 'super' heroes would lose the thing that made them special: the thing that the villain was denied as a child. Not by making it so no one could reach the heights of being a superhero, but by raising everyone to the height of a super hero; and thus removing the difference in height. After all, a super hero is someone to be looked up to and someone to get the autograph of like a celebrity... but you pass police officers on the street every day and never really think anything of it.
Think of the sentence like this: if everyone is six feet tall, no one can be considered taller than average because the average is six feet tall and everyone is six feet tall.
BNHA is literally everybody has superpowers, but not everyone is a hero.
Lycan is probably the worst target i could go for
*literally 30 seconds later* : i'll fucking do it again
Play this mode again pls! There are so many possibilities. I wonder how good wraith king is.
On the whole "if everyone is super, then no one is super" from the incredibles, the way I view it is that it's really a statement about how messed up Syndrome's view of the world is. Because this statement always makes sense IF you are talking about competition. Then in that case yes, if you give everyone an advantange then you have effectively given nobody an advantage. But that is Syndrome's problem; this statement that he makes DOES make sense to him BECAUSE he views everything, even being a hero and saving lives, as a competition. And consequently, he needs to prove himself the best, even at the cost of others
"if everybody's super then no one's super" is only true if you consider the main upside of superpowers to be both the power that you hold over people and the way that that power creates a social hierarchy with you at the top. IMO people who say that publicly are making a pretty horrifying condemnation of themselves.
And having a rare thing makes you stand out the most. Generally superpowers are just rare in the context of movies and it makes it stand out but if everyone has a superpower, then it doesn't stand out. Heck in the normal world, having 1 or no legs make you stand out
Nope, would you consider drinking water a super power? no, why? everyone can do it, the SUPER part in super power indicates that its OVER normal powers, normal powers are the powers that are the NORM, if only a few people could drink water then drinking water would be a super power, its pretty simple
@@camilog777 Not sure what you're trying to argue...
@@camilog777 That's the thing with superpowers, it's not like everybody will have the same, if it was like that humans would just change and that would become normal for us.
But if you think about different types of powers, society would have a social hierarchy around those with good genectics getting the better powers. Not much different from our world right now
So about the super power thing, I guess the way I look at it is that he's not necessarily saying no one has super powers but more along the lines of the fact that the implication is that people with super powers have a special place in society because there are so few and it's so rare, but when everyone has super powers your no longer really considered "special" amongst the masses because everyone has a super power and so therefore you are no longer a rare individual but just another person. it would be just like normal society is right now everyone has something they are good at and can do a bit better than others, but there is bound to be someone better than you at it as well. Like if only you had Supermans powers you would be praised. However if everyone in the world had the power of superman just like you, it's not that you don't have super powers but it's just you are no longer a special rare being amongst the world's people, now you're just like everyone else. That's just how I interpreted what he was saying in the movie anyway idk food for thought I suppose, also just want to say love the vids keep up the greatness!!
Baumi is the new giant from skyrim! @18:28
Boomi sir, i disagree. The concept of an superpower or ultimate is dependent on the concept of having an average ability. Raising that average to the level of a superhuman ability makes said superhuman ability or ultimate normal.
If everybody is 8 feet tall, an 8 feet tall woman/man seems normal to everyone and is not considered special.
Superpowers are a bad example in my opinion, because of their variety. Super strength, speed, intelligence… can be achieved on different levels and in different variations, making some combinations special.
Example: 1/3 of the population has a combination of super speed and super strenght. Only 1% has an extreme case of superhuman strength making them special or super.
In conclusion context is the key. (As it is in most things)
That was a really fun looking game, wonder what the other heros do!
I cannot find this game mode on the arcade, what's the name?
'super' is latin for over, above. A superpower is thus by definition something exceeding the normal standard of powers. Consequently, if everybody suddenly gained abilities like telekinesis, extreme strength, supersonic speed etc., those abilities are only exceeding the level of ability people had before, but not the new reference of what powerlevel common abilities have. So it would practically inacurate to use the term superpowers, because this doesn't serve any distinction anymore. And an ultimate thing is by definition the last, the optimal, the superlative. Thus, if every ability is called an ultimate, this term loses it's meaning. Now, in the context of this mod, there is an intelligible sense in saying every ability is an ultimate, because this is how the authors are trying to convey how abilities are balanced here relative to normal dota, and this isn't meant to become the general norm. But if Dota 3 would balance all abilities evenly and call them all ultimates, that would be pointless.
I think what Syndrome meant was "If no one stands out, no one will" like in My Hero Academia, where you're "normal" if you have a quirk
Yeah, if no one stands out no one will. Because if everyone stands out, then everyone will.
@@jarcase689 yeah, and his childhood trauma clearly shows that he wants the world to be non depending to supers and he wants to destroy their legacy.
I just don't understand why he had to do all the theatrics, when all he has to do is sell his inventions to the public. Like Apple. it would still have the same effect. I mean who wouldn't buy a jetpack!?
@@jarcase689 Then everyone won't/nobody will*
the idea of everybody being super meant, extraordinary, not superhero, so syndrome is pretty much right, depending how you look at it
Good vibes always enjoy your vids 😁👌
Hey baumi as a Canadian I’m all for a later time for the wigal tournament would love to get to play in that
It always feels weird selling Echo Sabre on tiny just because the double hit is such a massive increase to his Grow
Forget terrorblade with two ults when there's dark willow that literally has two ults
So about your "make it later for NA people" idea, I thought I'd mention that your stream normally ends around 5am my time. So it'd have to be a pretty big shift for it to work into schedules here.
I'm here because Genshin Impact's Anniversary feels lackluster and Baumi helps me relax.
Cant wait for the new pokemon video
How stronk is pudge in this mod
If everyone is super then nobody is. This statement is still correct in what it’s trying to say. It doesn’t mean it literally obviously it means if everyone is super then no one is special for having super powers. If everyone has legs no one is special for having legs .
i wonder how idiotic invoker is in this mode
So.. If every human being can walk the same way and at the same speed would that make it a super power? Yeah for a fish that would be but for humans.. Nah
everybody is alive then no one is alive then we are all dead right?
All ability have aghanim effect
Boys lets get 250k 🙏
No, in the context of saying "if everyone is super, no one will be" he means that because of the fact that having super powers makes you unique from other people, if everyone has super powers then no one is unique, and therefore no one is super. Your take is just wrong.
Idk man there was that one time we had the capitalism debate when Miki had to come in and calm u down… so idk if you never get angry… I mean I guess you can say most of the time….
Well everyone has that time even the most calm people sometimes it happens
@@noehonegger4624 yeah
Storm hammer is better than magic missile
👀