Raw Rider Patrons can watch the Full Length Reaction HERE: blindwavellc.com/looper-movie-full/ Want to see more Blind Wave Movie Reactions? Get up to 4 WEEKS Early Access at www.patreon.com/blindwave The Next 4 movies are: Psych: The Movie Trainspotting Uncharted The Shawshank Redemption
This and Glass were the last two movies that Bruce Willis was truly GREAT in. I wish nothing but the best for him now and hope his aphasia becomes more bearable.
I hope everything gets better for him. I truly feel bad for him because many people including myself thought he was coasting on easy parts or taking parts just for paycheck but never knowing what personal and physical struggle he has been going through, how hard it has been on him. Just goes to show you that you never know what someone is going through behind close doors and you don't know their truth.
@@noteliassmith Absolutely. Oddly not an actor widely thought of for "range" to jump out at you, until you look at his catalogue and it dawns on you that the man is a legend. Offbeat movie, offbeat director, and an offbeat actor. Moonrise Kingdom... forgot about that one, nice name drop!
I like the farm section. The film is pretty disciplined about telling its story and cutting away a lot of the world building you might expect in a sci-fi movie.
JGL might be one of the more underrated actors of the last decade or two. Premium Rush, Looper, 50/50, 500 Days of Summer, Inception, Dark Knight Rises, The Walk... Dude is legitimately fantastic.
I haven't seen that movie in a long time but I think it would be an interesting reaction from the crew if it's as good as I remember it and they haven't. seen it.
@@DarkElfPaladin I recently rewatched it. It's a pretty good representation of what kids would do with super powers and how these powers would affect their psyche. Has some cringe moments but overall a good watch.
Giving me an excuse to watch it once more, thank you BW. I like how they don’t want to give too much details/depths to time travel, limits the “loopholes”. While the pace did drag at the farm and there was some things I wish it did better, I found the ending close to perfect as a way to close the movie.
This is hands down the BEST movie that explores time travel for me! Highly recommend Rian Johnson's whole filmography. He tackles so many different genres with such craft and flair.
That cornfield-knife-gun scene that Calvin mentioned was from San Basilio, a 1981 action movie from the Philippines. I smiled like crazy when Calvin mentioned it!
No way....these guys never seen Looper? This movie is right up their alley, i figured they would've all seen it by now. Looper left a lasting impression on me...always wanted a sequel. Great movie.
I love Rian Johnson’s work. Brick is another favorite of mine from him. From 2005. JGL is in all his movies, whether it’s a starring role, cameo, or voice work.
When the talk moved to wishing the movie explored time travel and character interactions in greater length... Sounds like you guys need to watch the 12 Monkeys series. It's a solid four season Syfy show based on the movie. And the fourth season is written as the final season to wrap everything up, which is nice. You don't need to have seen the movie to watch the series, and ultimately, it might be better to skip the movie anyway if you're watching the series. The movie is great though too.
I may personally not be a huge fan of Rian Johnson’s Star Wars, but I do like his works outside of Star Wars. I’d like to see more original works from him. That said, I’m intrigued on what he has to offer for Knives Out 2.
Rian Johnson is actually a really good filmmaker with incredibly interesting ideas. Even if you set Star Wars movie aside, his entire body of work is strong. Looper is great, Knives Out is fantastic, The Brothers Bloom is interesting, and Brick (his debut) is actually just straight up one of my favorite films. Not to mention he's directed some of the best episodes of TV ever made. Also, I too, have been a big fan of the Kid Blue is Abe theory for a long time!
I still think The Last Jedi is one of the best Star Wars films in the franchise, however I understand why people have gripes with it given its very different tone. I maintain that I would *love* to see a Johnson directed trilogy, though one that stands on its own merits away from the Skywalker Saga. They probably shouldn't have ever had him come in to direct Episode VIII, and instead let Abrams do all of the sequel trilogy.
@@TyrannosavageRekt For me and a lot of people The Last Jedi was a great star wars film but it was a really bad Skywalker saga film, they just went and change a lot of very loved and establish characters. Imagine TLJ with new characters they present for that movie, it would have been the best star wars film since ESB
Lol, TLJ is filled inconsistencies and plot holes, there some convient stuff that happen to force to plot to work and even it really doesn't work. The characters and dialogue are also really awful. It was a terrible movie, Star Wars related or not.
the scene calvin was referring in 2:20 was a filipino film titled "ang pagbabalik ni leon guerrero" where the protag (leon guerrero) splits a bullet using a knife. lmao i never thought i'd hear it here.
One of the biggest things about Rian Johnson's films (Brick, The Brothers Bloom, Looper, The Last Jedi, Knives Out) are ALL written in a way where the way the narrative details unfold feels _totally_ different when you're rewatching them a second time. There are a lot of little hints about how information gets seeded around with Blue and others. The best part is that because Rian Johnson not only writes but he also storyboards all of his films, the shots and minor details are all intentionally set up, even if they're not fully expanded upon directly.
@@Pir-o Looper actually emphasizes a lot about why watching that film and The Last Jedi a second time are really important for Rian Johnson's movies. In both films - the most important parts of the stories are _the setting itself._ The main character is learning how to be a hero by focusing on how the seemingly unchanging parts of THAT SETTING needs to change. It also shows how only looking at their own personal suffering is just going to ensure that the cycle never changes, even though they ALL need it to. The Last Jedi builds its setting and tensions off of the same elements that inspired the original trilogy of Star Wars - war films & Japanese cinema. TLJ is especially drawing from Apocalypse Now, Twelve O'Clock High, Letter Never Sent, & Rashomon for it's story, on top of the elements Rian Johnson is already known for in the other films mentioned in my OP (with the exception of Knives Out which he made later). In Looper, (which was made before he was ever chosen to direct a Star Wars film), the whole film is using time-travel as a way to show how small events in your life can drastically reshape you decades later - both physically AND psychologically. The themes with the Rainmaker are all focused around the tiny little differences in life experience that will change the future of a kid with exceptional supernatural powers. The elements of the physical and psychological transformation all have some pretty clear links to the same changes linked to how Anakin became Darth Vader. The issues Anakin was facing as a former slave kid upon being taken from his home were; his father figure Qui-Gon dying, his brother Obi-Wan having to raise & mentor him, and his actual mother dying. On top of that, he fell in love with & married the princess who rescued him, while belonging to the Jedi Order where attachments like that are forbidden. Anakin losing the attachments to those he loved are central to his suffering in the same way that the end of Looper lays out why the Rainmaker turns into a monster. Darth Vader as a tool to preserve the Empire is just as critical as the Rainmaker creating the world of Loopers as assassins fated to murder themselves to keep that syndicate in power in the future. That's why Anakin's pain was manipulated by Palpatine into a fear of loss that blinded him to what he had become. Looper follows the same threads on the pains, losses, and lack of critical family figures that cause the Rainmaker to become a monster in the future. The key element is that it's about a cycle that locks itself into repeating, just like The First Order bringing back the Empire in The Force Awakens. Looper is all about breaking that cycle for someone ELSE rather than for yourself and so is TLJ. That's following the same themes in RotJ of Luke having to save his father Anakin rather than killing Vader OR saving himself from the Emperor. In The Last Jedi, those themes are at the core of why war profiteering fueling both sides is a conflict that causes governments to ignore the suffering of children outside of the immediate scope of either side's jurisdiction. The Old Republic wasn't helping slave kids like Anakin on worlds ruled by syndicates like the Hutts on Tatooine, and the New Republic still didn't help the slave kids on Cantonica where Canto Bight was fueled by the money from ensuring that conflict kept people looking elsewhere. Those who weren't busy with their own issues were rich enough to ignore the obvious exploitation, unaffected enough to not care, or to feel their own safety was too much to risk helping them - which is why it's up to Finn & Rose to tear down that facade that no one else will. In war OR peace, the issues that lead to the child Anakin eventually becoming Darth Vader were still unresolved in the Galaxy _regardless of who was in charge._ That's why the identity of Rey's family doesn't matter there, because she has the power to help those who need it and grew up as a deserted nobody like her, which is all that matters for WHY she needs to do something. The old Jedi Council forbidding attachments out of fear of the Dark Side is why Kylo Ren severs attachments as a means to embrace the Dark Side by refusing to care about people he loves like his parents. Ben struggles to kill Han AND his mother because his attachments are a strength to the good in him, not a weakness. Thus, Rey has to hold on to those attachments to save what matters, while also refusing to join Ben, no matter how much he desperately needs someone else. She can't let that attachment pull her to darkness, she needs to use their connection to ensure Ben isn't lost forever. That's why TLJ ends by giving that same hope of being a heroic Jedi to a slave kid through the legend of Luke Skywalker using non-violent resistance to save the people he cares about. Luke's legacy follows the same lessons Yoda taught for how he beat the Emperor - using the Force for knowledge and defense, NEVER attack. That was spread throughout the Galaxy in a way that detached the Jedi from being beholden to the sterile and dogmatic approach of the Jedi Council that lead to Darth Vader. That understanding and the old texts gave Rey everything she needed to succeed in bringing hope to others by ensuring that Luke wasn't The Last Jedi. *Those are all perspectives that you don't have until you've **_already_** seen the end of the films.* That's exactly how ALL Rian Johnson's films are laid out, and why they're all not only worth watching twice, but are a VERY different experience the second time, because you know to focus on something TOTALLY different as being the most important part of the story from what you assume at the beginning.
@@PierceArner not a single person in the world gonna read that. You do realize that, right? You think anyone cares enough about this topic to read THAT? Might as well read a 50 page essay about the brilliance of the writing in female Ghostbusters... Don't you have better things to do? Seems like u wasted a lot of time on it... I kinda feel bad. I think you should step away from the internet for a while. They are using TLJ to teach people how to NOT write a movie. Every single actor from the movie made fun of it at this point. Deal with it and move on, go outside. When I was forced to watch it again I only started noticing more and more mistakes and dumb things. Thats the moment when u realize how dumb it is, on your second watch. So yeah, No.
@@Pir-o It's always worth taking the time to share well-supported information with people, whoever they are! I really enjoy how Rian Johnson designs his films' stories, that's plenty sufficient a reason to write about it. There are a lot of interesting things to discover from other people by reading & engaging with reaction channels' comments (especially the Blindwave viewers). Learning things from other people's experienced point of view is a great way to spend time and gain new perspectives that might change how you think about other things you like. I have really detailed conversations in YT comments about things like this with other people… all the time - because I take the time to write things worth reading. The type of people who DO take that time to read it are the ones who share value by making replies equally worth reading. You reap what you sow, as it were. That's why you & I have totally different experiences in what we usually get from YT comments, based solely on the comments we make and how we interact with them. You just _think_ no one reads that stuff because you don't take the time to ever try. Dismissing that experience outright by ignoring what I wrote is… only your loss not mine. That's ok though, as my previous comment is still around for anyone who wants to read it, and I made sure it's worth the time to. So, if you or anyone else who's thinking about Looper and scanning through these comments wants to discuss or learn things they didn't consider about how Rian Johnson's storytelling is laid out they can! That's a win-win situation for me, (as is the ability to casually write and post online while relaxing outside, since the weather's great!)
I LOVE this movie. A personal favourite of mine and in my opinion really underrated. Although I do get that some people might not follow what’s going on with the time travel aspect.
There's a goof in the storyline of this movie, it's a paradox - in the future that bruce willis comes from, the rainmaker exists, but in bruce willis' past, he never met sarah and sid. So he didn't shoot sid in the face and he didn't kill sarah. Joseph Gordon Levitt only met sarah because he got the paper from Bruce Willis, and went to the address on the paper. So if the rainmaker existed in Bruce Willis' timeline, who originally shot sid in the face and killed sarah? because Bruce Willis was never there.
yeah it might look that way, but really with more analysis it can be determined Bruce Willis character made the Rainmaker. If he chose a different career there would be no Rainmaker or Sarah. Essentially he made his doomed reality, yet unlike movies you can change yourself to create a better future not kill yourself though it is symbolic and kind of the same thing. The BTTF trilogy does a great job of hiding the same wisdom. Doc made the clocktower, if he hadn't done that we wouldn't have the Trilogy, Doc realizes that the future is not set but it is whatever you make it.
That's known as a causal loop, and while it's easy to lump it in with other paradoxes, it technically isn't a paradox at all! The same phenomena can be seen in Interstellar.
I like how the movie explicitly tells you not to think about the mechanics of time travel because the rules for it don't make a whole lot of sense. They won't kill the young version of a looper on the run because 'it would mess things up' but disfiguring and amputating them won't? Certainly the guy's life is going to be significantly different over the next 30 years without his arms and legs. I enjoyed the movie, but it seems tailor made to give certain types of plot focused nerds aneurysms.
I had a very similar reaction when I first watched it. I liked it but something was off. But didn't know what. Watching your reaction made me realize what it was: the setup and Bruce Willis' casting makes you anticipate an action movie where both Joes team up and beat the bad guys. Instead, you get a more complex, less conventional second half that's great, but a lot less fun. The fact that these two never see eye-to-eye or connect with each other on any level whatsoever, is a bold and an unexpected choice, that feels unsatisfying, especially because you don't even realize right away that there is a payoff missing from the movie.
I would disagree it being "a lot less fun" That's the same argument I've heard towards Attack on Titan "oh they just talked that episode, that's a lot less fun" It's such a shallow way of looking at things. Action is fun, absolutely. But character interaction, growth, opposing ideals etc also are fun. I don't think this movie would've benefited from a standard "oh they team up and beat the bad guys", it'd just be another cookie cutter standard action movie. Instead we get one that to this day still gets talked about and theorized about because it dared to do something different. I also don't see how it's unsatisfying? The pay-off is that he realizes how to beat the loop, how to beat time itself, you know, the theme of the entire movie? That our actions have layered consequences?
or its bad maybe rather because the first half is about time travel, then the second half is some supernatural telekinesis shit? less action and not beating the bad guys is not boring, its a shit movie because the second half has nothing to do with the first one, not because they dont see eye to eye.
The movie isn't really strictly ALL about time travel. It uses time travel as a thematic and literary device to give the characters choices to make and lessons to learn from your future self or your past self. The title and the ending somewhat give off the idea that the story is a loop but the director leaves the story as a linear plot. *Spoiler* This is shown when both Joe's die at the end. If you watch the trailer it advertises as a time travel/ action movie. But the fact that it strays from that and tries to develope EVERY character and gives it a more natural built world makes it more of an actual story telling movie than a boring sci Fi action flick we're probably seen a bunch of fucking times. I commend this film for trying to be original in a world where people would rather see 2 hours of straight action time bending mind fuckery. The whole telekinesis plot line is shown in the beginning. Then slightly towards the end. Then at the climatic ending. This movie is about telekinesis as much as it is about time travel. Barely. And that's what makes it Great and Original. Life and THIS movie is about "men tryna figure out how to keep what's theirs, it's the only kind of man there is". Plus the music/ special effects/ acting/ and set design are all great. The fact there's as little cgi as possible makes it even better. Edit: grammer
@@blinkachu5275 I think, ultimately, it is a better and a much more interesting choice to not have them come together, but the screenplay should've done a better job making the audience realize that it was doing that and should've explored that idea in more detail. They could've given us a few moments where they do get along, bond over shared experiences and empathize with each other's situations before realizing that they are at odds with each other or that they don't like each other. That way you still get the payoff and the conflict they have feels earned, because in the movie, they are being rude and condescending to each other right out of the gate without a clear reason.
You know, when starting this reaction, I was not expecting to see them go into a tangent about removing tree trunks. Blind Wave seems to always finds a way to turn inconsequential moments into entertaining talking points.
I had a similar feeling about the movie overall, however, I still think the movie is well made and that leaves me with a positive view of it as a whole.
Its a very very good thing that tree stumps grow back, guys! Trees are good. We NEED them. It's messed up that humans cut them down for aesthetic reasons. Unless a tree is diseased, dying or brittle & could fall on your house, let them be! - end of tree hugging rant 😁
This movie is a prime example of why I rarely like time travel movies. They typically don‘t make sense once you stop for even a minute to think about it and question the internal logic of the movie (there are exceptions). The ending is usually the worst part, where for some reason Hollywood writers love to suddenly change the logic of their time travel setup, in order to catch viewers by surprise. Well no shit it‘s a surprise, you just broke the rules you established before 😂
Looper is one of my favorite movies. I've watched it so many times and made everyone I know (practically) watch it. Maybe I don't notice the issues with pacing because I love Bruce Willis and Joseph Gordon-Leavitt so much.
These guys are easily the best reactors on TH-cam. Their analysis of the film techniques used as well as the storytelling devices and pacing is really just unmatched when compared to other reactors. Even if I disagree with their opinions I can almost always see why they felt a certain way about a movie
I like the theory of the loop still going because he's angry over his mom's death. Cause that's what set him off in the first place, so therefore nothing changed since he didn't believe Blunts character was his mom and he ends up being the Rainmaker anyway. It's a decent theory but I can't remember exactly how it works so I might have it a bit wrong.
This movie’s dope. Solid. I have a rule I try to abide by when I experience stories that involve time-travel: don’t think about it because it won’t make sense. We, as humans, have no idea how time works and therefore time-travel. There are several theories and when you sit down and think about them…they’re contradictory. For example (kinda): How did the Rainmaker become bad? What was the catalyst? Was it Old Joe’s actions? Can’t be because we see how his story plays out and he kills his older self and the Rainmaker is bad anyway. Rainmaker kills his wife which might be a spiteful thing because Old Joe would’ve killed his mom. Eye for an eye. Doesn’t make sense unless it was something else entirely. Maybe the one (that was supposed to be him to end his loop) Old Joe killed wasn’t him, but someone his future self sent in his place; we never saw his face. Then Old Joe comes back and does the deed and makes the Rainmaker. 🤷🏽♂️
theres only so many levels deep of questions that people will ask in a time travel scenario movie, if you can answer all of them...well you did your job. if you cant or dont even try leave time travel alone... But you should ask questions about whatever you are watching, i believe.
@@ygkemosabi8280 That’s my point: you can’t. There will always be something people can question that can’t be answered or is answered in a convoluted way.
@@ThePenpachi yes but my point is you never have to answer "every" question just the questions your writing specifically introduces/asks "leave the rest to imagination" is a fair thing to do with wide scope ideas.
Please guys🙏🙏 You have to do "Dark" reactions.. it's the best sci-fi show currently with time travel and only you guys can do justice to most complex show ever
Joe didn’t need to go back kill the other kid because Old Joe got the memories when Sid killed that guy and Present Joe saw. He just knew that would be the Rainmaker.
Unfortunately they did such a good job making Joseph Gordon Leavitt look like Bruce willis that it gets an uncanny valley vibe. Really freaked me out while watching
Great fucking movie. When the guy is having limbs n shit removed while on the way to the warehouse, is one of the most brutal examples of time travel/manipulation (or whatever lol) I have ever seen.
So I seen a video where a guy cut down a tree and left the branches and leaves dry then he put a bottomless burn barrel around the stump and burned all the branches and leaves, probably took 12 hours but afterwards even the roots were gone because the ground was lower. Probably really good for the soil as well
I actually love this movie, enjoy the whole thing. I'm a fan of Emily Blunt so I don't dislike the whole farmhouse setting. I like the character building from it and builds up why he makes the decision he does in the end because he ends up caring about the mom and son when before that point he had been pretty selfish.
1:04:05 Now I have this going through my head - I'm a Gatman ba-da-ba-da-ba-be bop bop bodda bope, I'm a Gatman. But seriously I had the same reaction with the movie where I really liked the first half but wasn't as invested in the rainmaker storyline.
Other great (possibly unknown by you guys?) time travel movies: - Primer (2004) This is like the GRADUATE level/Master Class of time travel movies. You'll definitely need to watch it more than once. :D - TimeCrimes (CronoCrimenes)(2007) Just a small, down and dirty, "What if time travel fucked up your life?" It is in Spanish.
Great Reaction! I been subscribed to you guys for a long time. I recommend you guys to watch the movie called Prisoners. The main cast is Jake Gyllenhaal, Hugh Jackman, Paul Dano, Terrance Howard, Viola Davis, and some more good actors. The movie is based on kidnapping. The Director is Denis Villeneuve.
12 Monkey's the TV show should be on the schedule. It is vastly better then a lot of stuff they'd watched like the MoU etc. It would provide some opportunity for real speculating and trying to figure out time and how it all pieces together, as well as the themes of family, brotherhood, mother's/father's what they would do for their children etc. Looper touches on some of this but 12 Monkey's expands upon this.
Old Joe didn’t go back to kill that second kid because he saw the new memory of the TK kid before he got captured! So he knew that kid was the rainmaker!
All I can think about is how Joe falls and dies in the beginning and everything restarts, yet 1: he's somehow able to stop that from happening, and 2: he kills himself at the end and things don't restart or change.
OK I'm putting the suggestion out there that they watch new mutants as they reacted to the trailers but never did a review of it so a reaction would be great I personally love that movie so I'd like to see their thoughts on it, anyone agree
Even when I watched this on the big screen in the theatres, I didn't notice the CGI for Gordon-Levitz' face, blending his with Willis' face. But, I also wasn't expecting that to be possible (I might also have watched it in 3D). I think they may have blended their voices a bit, too. Once Eric mentioned something weird about the face, it became obvious.
@UCAO0sMiXEYC4Tz3jWZOiEHA Gordon-Levitt spent hour's every morning getting prosthetics applied to look like Willis, not cgi for Willis to look like Joseph.
![[UNCUT] เก็บ "สจ.โต้ง" เอี่ยวมาเฟีย รู้ตัวคนบงการ ก่อนสั่งลั่นไก I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 13 ธ.ค.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/o-J_p62D40w/mqdefault.jpg)
Raw Rider Patrons can watch the Full Length Reaction HERE: blindwavellc.com/looper-movie-full/
Want to see more Blind Wave Movie Reactions? Get up to 4 WEEKS Early Access at www.patreon.com/blindwave
The Next 4 movies are:
Psych: The Movie
Trainspotting
Uncharted
The Shawshank Redemption
:)
CAN WE GET INTERSTELLAR!!!???
Checkout ''Predestination'' - with Ethan Hawke
The scene where the guy is being tortured by butchering his past self is iconic. Talk about horror without showing gore directly.
Iconic yes but doesn't make sense. Why torture him when you can just kill his past self like immediately
It's the part where he's screaming for them to wait as his parts are disappearing, reaching the door on just stumps that get me.
“Iconic” is a strong word.
This and Glass were the last two movies that Bruce Willis was truly GREAT in. I wish nothing but the best for him now and hope his aphasia becomes more bearable.
His performance in Moonrise Kingdom applies if you change it to "last three movies"
I hope everything gets better for him. I truly feel bad for him because many people including myself thought he was coasting on easy parts or taking parts just for paycheck but never knowing what personal and physical struggle he has been going through, how hard it has been on him. Just goes to show you that you never know what someone is going through behind close doors and you don't know their truth.
@@noteliassmith Absolutely. Oddly not an actor widely thought of for "range" to jump out at you, until you look at his catalogue and it dawns on you that the man is a legend. Offbeat movie, offbeat director, and an offbeat actor. Moonrise Kingdom... forgot about that one, nice name drop!
I thought Death Wish good
I like the farm section. The film is pretty disciplined about telling its story and cutting away a lot of the world building you might expect in a sci-fi movie.
JGL might be one of the more underrated actors of the last decade or two.
Premium Rush, Looper, 50/50, 500 Days of Summer, Inception, Dark Knight Rises, The Walk... Dude is legitimately fantastic.
Underrated? ''3rd Rock From the Sun'', ''Mysterious Skin'', ''Brick'', ''Shadowboxer'', ''The Lookout'', ''500 Days of Summer'', ''Hesher'', ....
Love JGL but premium rush was ruuuuuubbish.
You guys are forgetting his very first movie, Angels in the Outfield.
Chronicle came out the same year, another movie with an Akira-inspired ending.
I haven't seen that movie in a long time but I think it would be an interesting reaction from the crew if it's as good as I remember it and they haven't. seen it.
@@DarkElfPaladin I recently rewatched it. It's a pretty good representation of what kids would do with super powers and how these powers would affect their psyche. Has some cringe moments but overall a good watch.
Yes chronicle is definitely a film the guys should watch if they haven’t seen it
oh!! chronicle is genuinely still one of my favorite films
The whole "well, looks like your former self is being slowly dismantled" thing was kinda terrifying to me
Giving me an excuse to watch it once more, thank you BW. I like how they don’t want to give too much details/depths to time travel, limits the “loopholes”. While the pace did drag at the farm and there was some things I wish it did better, I found the ending close to perfect as a way to close the movie.
This is hands down the BEST movie that explores time travel for me! Highly recommend Rian Johnson's whole filmography. He tackles so many different genres with such craft and flair.
I don't want to ruin your world view but for time travel, watch Primer, and as far as Riann Johnson goes, he is an okay director at best.
@@user-fg5lq2dg4h Primer still has some holes in it. And Rian Johnson is a fine director.
Wish he did the same for star wars
@@user-fg5lq2dg4h an OK director that directed some of the greatest episodes in tv history? Yeah I'm pretty sure he's way better than ok kiddo.
@@user-fg5lq2dg4hwatched Primer, was an interesting concept, but thematically not that satisfying to me at all.
That cornfield-knife-gun scene that Calvin mentioned was from San Basilio, a 1981 action movie from the Philippines.
I smiled like crazy when Calvin mentioned it!
Yung kay Lito Lapid ba yun? hahaha
@@engelfelipe2261 Yes, sir. Haha
No way....these guys never seen Looper? This movie is right up their alley, i figured they would've all seen it by now. Looper left a lasting impression on me...always wanted a sequel. Great movie.
did this movie come out after bruce willis fell off? that could be an excuse to why no one has seen it
@@ygkemosabi8280 no it was earlier than that I'd say, but towards the end.
I love Rian Johnson’s work. Brick is another favorite of mine from him. From 2005. JGL is in all his movies, whether it’s a starring role, cameo, or voice work.
He’s not in Knives Out, is he?
@@mercysirmaa he is! He voices one of the detectives off screen.
When the talk moved to wishing the movie explored time travel and character interactions in greater length... Sounds like you guys need to watch the 12 Monkeys series. It's a solid four season Syfy show based on the movie. And the fourth season is written as the final season to wrap everything up, which is nice. You don't need to have seen the movie to watch the series, and ultimately, it might be better to skip the movie anyway if you're watching the series. The movie is great though too.
I totally agree with this. 12 Monkeys was really good and I'm very satisfied with how they ended it.
12 Monkeys was an excellent movie, I don't know about the series though.
@@NathanWELSHY there'll never be a time travel series like it, even though I love Legends of Tomorrow and Doctor Who, I stand by my word
@@TheLibrarianOG1 Um Have you seen Dark ? The greatest time travel show
@@TheLibrarianOG1 just came here to say that, you should definitiely check out Dark!
I may personally not be a huge fan of Rian Johnson’s Star Wars, but I do like his works outside of Star Wars. I’d like to see more original works from him. That said, I’m intrigued on what he has to offer for Knives Out 2.
Rian Johnson is actually a really good filmmaker with incredibly interesting ideas. Even if you set Star Wars movie aside, his entire body of work is strong. Looper is great, Knives Out is fantastic, The Brothers Bloom is interesting, and Brick (his debut) is actually just straight up one of my favorite films. Not to mention he's directed some of the best episodes of TV ever made.
Also, I too, have been a big fan of the Kid Blue is Abe theory for a long time!
I still think The Last Jedi is one of the best Star Wars films in the franchise, however I understand why people have gripes with it given its very different tone. I maintain that I would *love* to see a Johnson directed trilogy, though one that stands on its own merits away from the Skywalker Saga. They probably shouldn't have ever had him come in to direct Episode VIII, and instead let Abrams do all of the sequel trilogy.
@@TyrannosavageRekt I mostly agree. The problem wasn't TLJ at all as much as them not going in with a story plan for all three movies.
@@TyrannosavageRekt For me and a lot of people The Last Jedi was a great star wars film but it was a really bad Skywalker saga film, they just went and change a lot of very loved and establish characters. Imagine TLJ with new characters they present for that movie, it would have been the best star wars film since ESB
Lol, TLJ is filled inconsistencies and plot holes, there some convient stuff that happen to force to plot to work and even it really doesn't work. The characters and dialogue are also really awful.
It was a terrible movie, Star Wars related or not.
@@hoya1178 Such a condescending reply
Looper is excellent, and also really underrated
I love this movie. Levitt would've been amazing Spike I think
I wish they would watch "Dark".
Well, enjoy, my friend
I was dumbfounded at the end of the movie as well, but I didn't overthink it like you guy's did😂 It made sense in my head
I love how they made Joseph look so much like Bruce.
the scene calvin was referring in 2:20 was a filipino film titled "ang pagbabalik ni leon guerrero" where the protag (leon guerrero) splits a bullet using a knife. lmao i never thought i'd hear it here.
One of the biggest things about Rian Johnson's films (Brick, The Brothers Bloom, Looper, The Last Jedi, Knives Out) are ALL written in a way where the way the narrative details unfold feels _totally_ different when you're rewatching them a second time.
There are a lot of little hints about how information gets seeded around with Blue and others. The best part is that because Rian Johnson not only writes but he also storyboards all of his films, the shots and minor details are all intentionally set up, even if they're not fully expanded upon directly.
Oh yeah, TLJ feels totally different! You hate it even more the second time around. Assuming you would be brave enough to do that to yourself again
@@Pir-o Looper actually emphasizes a lot about why watching that film and The Last Jedi a second time are really important for Rian Johnson's movies. In both films - the most important parts of the stories are _the setting itself._
The main character is learning how to be a hero by focusing on how the seemingly unchanging parts of THAT SETTING needs to change. It also shows how only looking at their own personal suffering is just going to ensure that the cycle never changes, even though they ALL need it to.
The Last Jedi builds its setting and tensions off of the same elements that inspired the original trilogy of Star Wars - war films & Japanese cinema. TLJ is especially drawing from Apocalypse Now, Twelve O'Clock High, Letter Never Sent, & Rashomon for it's story, on top of the elements Rian Johnson is already known for in the other films mentioned in my OP (with the exception of Knives Out which he made later).
In Looper, (which was made before he was ever chosen to direct a Star Wars film), the whole film is using time-travel as a way to show how small events in your life can drastically reshape you decades later - both physically AND psychologically. The themes with the Rainmaker are all focused around the tiny little differences in life experience that will change the future of a kid with exceptional supernatural powers. The elements of the physical and psychological transformation all have some pretty clear links to the same changes linked to how Anakin became Darth Vader.
The issues Anakin was facing as a former slave kid upon being taken from his home were; his father figure Qui-Gon dying, his brother Obi-Wan having to raise & mentor him, and his actual mother dying. On top of that, he fell in love with & married the princess who rescued him, while belonging to the Jedi Order where attachments like that are forbidden. Anakin losing the attachments to those he loved are central to his suffering in the same way that the end of Looper lays out why the Rainmaker turns into a monster. Darth Vader as a tool to preserve the Empire is just as critical as the Rainmaker creating the world of Loopers as assassins fated to murder themselves to keep that syndicate in power in the future.
That's why Anakin's pain was manipulated by Palpatine into a fear of loss that blinded him to what he had become. Looper follows the same threads on the pains, losses, and lack of critical family figures that cause the Rainmaker to become a monster in the future. The key element is that it's about a cycle that locks itself into repeating, just like The First Order bringing back the Empire in The Force Awakens. Looper is all about breaking that cycle for someone ELSE rather than for yourself and so is TLJ. That's following the same themes in RotJ of Luke having to save his father Anakin rather than killing Vader OR saving himself from the Emperor.
In The Last Jedi, those themes are at the core of why war profiteering fueling both sides is a conflict that causes governments to ignore the suffering of children outside of the immediate scope of either side's jurisdiction. The Old Republic wasn't helping slave kids like Anakin on worlds ruled by syndicates like the Hutts on Tatooine, and the New Republic still didn't help the slave kids on Cantonica where Canto Bight was fueled by the money from ensuring that conflict kept people looking elsewhere. Those who weren't busy with their own issues were rich enough to ignore the obvious exploitation, unaffected enough to not care, or to feel their own safety was too much to risk helping them - which is why it's up to Finn & Rose to tear down that facade that no one else will.
In war OR peace, the issues that lead to the child Anakin eventually becoming Darth Vader were still unresolved in the Galaxy _regardless of who was in charge._ That's why the identity of Rey's family doesn't matter there, because she has the power to help those who need it and grew up as a deserted nobody like her, which is all that matters for WHY she needs to do something.
The old Jedi Council forbidding attachments out of fear of the Dark Side is why Kylo Ren severs attachments as a means to embrace the Dark Side by refusing to care about people he loves like his parents. Ben struggles to kill Han AND his mother because his attachments are a strength to the good in him, not a weakness. Thus, Rey has to hold on to those attachments to save what matters, while also refusing to join Ben, no matter how much he desperately needs someone else. She can't let that attachment pull her to darkness, she needs to use their connection to ensure Ben isn't lost forever.
That's why TLJ ends by giving that same hope of being a heroic Jedi to a slave kid through the legend of Luke Skywalker using non-violent resistance to save the people he cares about.
Luke's legacy follows the same lessons Yoda taught for how he beat the Emperor - using the Force for knowledge and defense, NEVER attack. That was spread throughout the Galaxy in a way that detached the Jedi from being beholden to the sterile and dogmatic approach of the Jedi Council that lead to Darth Vader.
That understanding and the old texts gave Rey everything she needed to succeed in bringing hope to others by ensuring that Luke wasn't The Last Jedi.
*Those are all perspectives that you don't have until you've **_already_** seen the end of the films.*
That's exactly how ALL Rian Johnson's films are laid out, and why they're all not only worth watching twice, but are a VERY different experience the second time, because you know to focus on something TOTALLY different as being the most important part of the story from what you assume at the beginning.
@@PierceArner not a single person in the world gonna read that. You do realize that, right? You think anyone cares enough about this topic to read THAT?
Might as well read a 50 page essay about the brilliance of the writing in female Ghostbusters... Don't you have better things to do? Seems like u wasted a lot of time on it... I kinda feel bad. I think you should step away from the internet for a while.
They are using TLJ to teach people how to NOT write a movie. Every single actor from the movie made fun of it at this point. Deal with it and move on, go outside.
When I was forced to watch it again I only started noticing more and more mistakes and dumb things. Thats the moment when u realize how dumb it is, on your second watch. So yeah, No.
@@Pir-o It's always worth taking the time to share well-supported information with people, whoever they are! I really enjoy how Rian Johnson designs his films' stories, that's plenty sufficient a reason to write about it.
There are a lot of interesting things to discover from other people by reading & engaging with reaction channels' comments (especially the Blindwave viewers). Learning things from other people's experienced point of view is a great way to spend time and gain new perspectives that might change how you think about other things you like.
I have really detailed conversations in YT comments about things like this with other people… all the time - because I take the time to write things worth reading. The type of people who DO take that time to read it are the ones who share value by making replies equally worth reading. You reap what you sow, as it were.
That's why you & I have totally different experiences in what we usually get from YT comments, based solely on the comments we make and how we interact with them. You just _think_ no one reads that stuff because you don't take the time to ever try. Dismissing that experience outright by ignoring what I wrote is… only your loss not mine.
That's ok though, as my previous comment is still around for anyone who wants to read it, and I made sure it's worth the time to. So, if you or anyone else who's thinking about Looper and scanning through these comments wants to discuss or learn things they didn't consider about how Rian Johnson's storytelling is laid out they can!
That's a win-win situation for me, (as is the ability to casually write and post online while relaxing outside, since the weather's great!)
@@Pir-o Reading that takes less than watching this reaction video.
I LOVE this movie. A personal favourite of mine and in my opinion really underrated. Although I do get that some people might not follow what’s going on with the time travel aspect.
There's a goof in the storyline of this movie, it's a paradox - in the future that bruce willis comes from, the rainmaker exists, but in bruce willis' past, he never met sarah and sid. So he didn't shoot sid in the face and he didn't kill sarah. Joseph Gordon Levitt only met sarah because he got the paper from Bruce Willis, and went to the address on the paper. So if the rainmaker existed in Bruce Willis' timeline, who originally shot sid in the face and killed sarah? because Bruce Willis was never there.
yeah it might look that way, but really with more analysis it can be determined Bruce Willis character made the Rainmaker. If he chose a different career there would be no Rainmaker or Sarah. Essentially he made his doomed reality, yet unlike movies you can change yourself to create a better future not kill yourself though it is symbolic and kind of the same thing. The BTTF trilogy does a great job of hiding the same wisdom. Doc made the clocktower, if he hadn't done that we wouldn't have the Trilogy, Doc realizes that the future is not set but it is whatever you make it.
That's known as a causal loop, and while it's easy to lump it in with other paradoxes, it technically isn't a paradox at all! The same phenomena can be seen in Interstellar.
This was a great movie and the ending really made it even better
I like how the movie explicitly tells you not to think about the mechanics of time travel because the rules for it don't make a whole lot of sense. They won't kill the young version of a looper on the run because 'it would mess things up' but disfiguring and amputating them won't? Certainly the guy's life is going to be significantly different over the next 30 years without his arms and legs.
I enjoyed the movie, but it seems tailor made to give certain types of plot focused nerds aneurysms.
YESSS RICK, all i could think of during that telekinesis scene was of scanners
I'm honestly a little shocked by your guys reaction given how much praise this movie usually gets. I'm glad you all enjoyed it tho
The guy loosing his limbs is a scene that haunts me to this day, it's horrific!
I had a very similar reaction when I first watched it. I liked it but something was off. But didn't know what. Watching your reaction made me realize what it was: the setup and Bruce Willis' casting makes you anticipate an action movie where both Joes team up and beat the bad guys. Instead, you get a more complex, less conventional second half that's great, but a lot less fun. The fact that these two never see eye-to-eye or connect with each other on any level whatsoever, is a bold and an unexpected choice, that feels unsatisfying, especially because you don't even realize right away that there is a payoff missing from the movie.
I would disagree it being "a lot less fun"
That's the same argument I've heard towards Attack on Titan "oh they just talked that episode, that's a lot less fun"
It's such a shallow way of looking at things. Action is fun, absolutely. But character interaction, growth, opposing ideals etc also are fun. I don't think this movie would've benefited from a standard "oh they team up and beat the bad guys", it'd just be another cookie cutter standard action movie. Instead we get one that to this day still gets talked about and theorized about because it dared to do something different.
I also don't see how it's unsatisfying? The pay-off is that he realizes how to beat the loop, how to beat time itself, you know, the theme of the entire movie? That our actions have layered consequences?
or its bad maybe rather because the first half is about time travel, then the second half is some supernatural telekinesis shit? less action and not beating the bad guys is not boring, its a shit movie because the second half has nothing to do with the first one, not because they dont see eye to eye.
The movie isn't really strictly ALL about time travel. It uses time travel as a thematic and literary device to give the characters choices to make and lessons to learn from your future self or your past self. The title and the ending somewhat give off the idea that the story is a loop but the director leaves the story as a linear plot. *Spoiler* This is shown when both Joe's die at the end. If you watch the trailer it advertises as a time travel/ action movie. But the fact that it strays from that and tries to develope EVERY character and gives it a more natural built world makes it more of an actual story telling movie than a boring sci Fi action flick we're probably seen a bunch of fucking times. I commend this film for trying to be original in a world where people would rather see 2 hours of straight action time bending mind fuckery. The whole telekinesis plot line is shown in the beginning. Then slightly towards the end. Then at the climatic ending. This movie is about telekinesis as much as it is about time travel. Barely. And that's what makes it Great and Original. Life and THIS movie is about "men tryna figure out how to keep what's theirs, it's the only kind of man there is".
Plus the music/ special effects/ acting/ and set design are all great. The fact there's as little cgi as possible makes it even better.
Edit: grammer
@@blinkachu5275 no it is definitely less fun and not that good.
@@blinkachu5275 I think, ultimately, it is a better and a much more interesting choice to not have them come together, but the screenplay should've done a better job making the audience realize that it was doing that and should've explored that idea in more detail. They could've given us a few moments where they do get along, bond over shared experiences and empathize with each other's situations before realizing that they are at odds with each other or that they don't like each other. That way you still get the payoff and the conflict they have feels earned, because in the movie, they are being rude and condescending to each other right out of the gate without a clear reason.
they need to watch DARK
Such a great movie, i remember watching deadpool 2 and telling my friend "man this is looper but funny"
You know, when starting this reaction, I was not expecting to see them go into a tangent about removing tree trunks. Blind Wave seems to always finds a way to turn inconsequential moments into entertaining talking points.
I had a similar feeling about the movie overall, however, I still think the movie is well made and that leaves me with a positive view of it as a whole.
Its a very very good thing that tree stumps grow back, guys! Trees are good. We NEED them. It's messed up that humans cut them down for aesthetic reasons. Unless a tree is diseased, dying or brittle & could fall on your house, let them be! - end of tree hugging rant 😁
Just watched it for the first time today because of y’all. Finally. Been wanting to for a long time. That was amazing. Loved it so much.
This movie is a prime example of why I rarely like time travel movies. They typically don‘t make sense once you stop for even a minute to think about it and question the internal logic of the movie (there are exceptions). The ending is usually the worst part, where for some reason Hollywood writers love to suddenly change the logic of their time travel setup, in order to catch viewers by surprise. Well no shit it‘s a surprise, you just broke the rules you established before 😂
Looper is one of my favorite movies. I've watched it so many times and made everyone I know (practically) watch it. Maybe I don't notice the issues with pacing because I love Bruce Willis and Joseph Gordon-Leavitt so much.
Love it when the @Blind Wave crew react to a film I love, especially one I've not seen in ages. Great choice.
Crazy. I just watched this film for the first time a couple of days ago. Glad y’all reacted to this movie.
Just watched this movie for the first time yesterday, and seeing that you guys just put this out made me so happy! Fantastic film!
These guys are easily the best reactors on TH-cam. Their analysis of the film techniques used as well as the storytelling devices and pacing is really just unmatched when compared to other reactors. Even if I disagree with their opinions I can almost always see why they felt a certain way about a movie
I like the theory of the loop still going because he's angry over his mom's death.
Cause that's what set him off in the first place, so therefore nothing changed since he didn't believe Blunts character was his mom and he ends up being the Rainmaker anyway.
It's a decent theory but I can't remember exactly how it works so I might have it a bit wrong.
This movie’s dope. Solid.
I have a rule I try to abide by when I experience stories that involve time-travel: don’t think about it because it won’t make sense. We, as humans, have no idea how time works and therefore time-travel. There are several theories and when you sit down and think about them…they’re contradictory.
For example (kinda): How did the Rainmaker become bad? What was the catalyst? Was it Old Joe’s actions? Can’t be because we see how his story plays out and he kills his older self and the Rainmaker is bad anyway. Rainmaker kills his wife which might be a spiteful thing because Old Joe would’ve killed his mom. Eye for an eye. Doesn’t make sense unless it was something else entirely. Maybe the one (that was supposed to be him to end his loop) Old Joe killed wasn’t him, but someone his future self sent in his place; we never saw his face. Then Old Joe comes back and does the deed and makes the Rainmaker. 🤷🏽♂️
Time Travel 101: 'You can't undo the causes of your own actions'
theres only so many levels deep of questions that people will ask in a time travel scenario movie, if you can answer all of them...well you did your job. if you cant or dont even try leave time travel alone... But you should ask questions about whatever you are watching, i believe.
@@ygkemosabi8280 That’s my point: you can’t. There will always be something people can question that can’t be answered or is answered in a convoluted way.
@@ThePenpachi yes but my point is you never have to answer "every" question just the questions your writing specifically introduces/asks "leave the rest to imagination" is a fair thing to do with wide scope ideas.
yess Rian Johnson is a king
Please guys🙏🙏 You have to do "Dark" reactions.. it's the best sci-fi show currently with time travel and only you guys can do justice to most complex show ever
I haven’t watched this movie in years, but I really like it. I imagine it would be pretty amazing as a mini series. And ofc Emily Blunt is ✊❤️😭😮💨🫡💕
ong shes great in everything lmaooo
They should watch Brick. No Bruce Willis, but Rian Johnson and Joseph Gordon-Levitt.
Definitely this.
Joe didn’t need to go back kill the other kid because Old Joe got the memories when Sid killed that guy and Present Joe saw. He just knew that would be the Rainmaker.
1:10 my boi Rick random but funny asf
I hope they watch and react to Jumper as well.
Def watch Dark
This is a great movie, but I can see why it is hit or miss with a lot of people.
Underrated! Looooved this1🔥
Damn, now I want you guys to watch Jumper. Underrated movie.
Looper is one of my favourite all time movies.
First time watching I didn't love it. But second time I loved this movie.
I love this movie it’s absolutely a classic for me
"What game is this, Rick?"
"It's math."
The ending always breaks my heart 🥺🥺❤️
I came for the looper reaction. I stayed for the stumps.
Shout-out to Bruce Willis....stay strong
A few of the ideas in this are also seen in the movie "Frequency"
Unfortunately they did such a good job making Joseph Gordon Leavitt look like Bruce willis that it gets an uncanny valley vibe. Really freaked me out while watching
Great fucking movie. When the guy is having limbs n shit removed while on the way to the warehouse, is one of the most brutal examples of time travel/manipulation (or whatever lol) I have ever seen.
YES this is one of my favourite movies!
This is one of my favourite movies of all time. S rank for me!
Jumper is such a nostalgic movie for me... i hope one day you guys do a reaction
Stump talk around 45:00 is my favorite part of this video lol
So I seen a video where a guy cut down a tree and left the branches and leaves dry then he put a bottomless burn barrel around the stump and burned all the branches and leaves, probably took 12 hours but afterwards even the roots were gone because the ground was lower. Probably really good for the soil as well
One of my favorite movies ever.
The whole thing will collapse if you start to think about time travel.
HOLY SHIT! The guy that the kid kills in the house is John Dorie from Fear The Walking Dead! I had no idea!
I actually love this movie, enjoy the whole thing. I'm a fan of Emily Blunt so I don't dislike the whole farmhouse setting. I like the character building from it and builds up why he makes the decision he does in the end because he ends up caring about the mom and son when before that point he had been pretty selfish.
1:04:05 Now I have this going through my head - I'm a Gatman ba-da-ba-da-ba-be bop bop bodda bope, I'm a Gatman.
But seriously I had the same reaction with the movie where I really liked the first half but wasn't as invested in the rainmaker storyline.
At the end loop continues because she got all the silver and gold and created loopers. Loop with loops within loops. Just like 12monkeys TV SERIES
The time torture scene shock me the first time I saw it
1:01:10 he has a particular set of skills, skills he has acquired over a very long career
You guys need to watch the corridor crew VFX artists react to the shot of him dying and his legs disappearing it is so cool
Other great (possibly unknown by you guys?) time travel movies:
- Primer (2004) This is like the GRADUATE level/Master Class of time travel movies. You'll definitely need to watch it more than once. :D
- TimeCrimes (CronoCrimenes)(2007) Just a small, down and dirty, "What if time travel fucked up your life?" It is in Spanish.
Great Reaction! I been subscribed to you guys for a long time. I recommend you guys to watch the movie called Prisoners. The main cast is Jake Gyllenhaal, Hugh Jackman, Paul Dano, Terrance Howard, Viola Davis, and some more good actors. The movie is based on kidnapping. The Director is Denis Villeneuve.
that's Paul Dano btw aka Riddler
This movie is some first rate, excellent sci-fi
When I first saw this movie I'd not long ago played inFamous on the PS3, and I thought there were some similarities between the two. Anyone else?
12 Monkey's the TV show should be on the schedule. It is vastly better then a lot of stuff they'd watched like the MoU etc. It would provide some opportunity for real speculating and trying to figure out time and how it all pieces together, as well as the themes of family, brotherhood, mother's/father's what they would do for their children etc. Looper touches on some of this but 12 Monkey's expands upon this.
Thanks, Eric! Thanks, Rick! Thanks, Calvin! Thanks, Aaron! ➰
Old Joe didn’t go back to kill that second kid because he saw the new memory of the TK kid before he got captured! So he knew that kid was the rainmaker!
Well this just made my night
My all time favorite movie
All I can think about is how Joe falls and dies in the beginning and everything restarts, yet 1: he's somehow able to stop that from happening, and 2: he kills himself at the end and things don't restart or change.
I've been a time travel nut since I was younger, but let me just say the ending of this movie gave 8 year old me nightmares for weeks.
yall know this is the second movie that Bruce Willis travels back in time and his younger self saw his own death
OK I'm putting the suggestion out there that they watch new mutants as they reacted to the trailers but never did a review of it so a reaction would be great I personally love that movie so I'd like to see their thoughts on it, anyone agree
Also I believe you are guaranteed to live 30 years once your loop is closed
i immediately thought of jumper when i saw this title
Oh... I actually clicked on this thinking it would be jumper and they even bring up that confusion o.o
you guys did Looper??? Sick!
My favorite time travel movie ever
Looper jumper looper jumper
You guys should have watched Hooper
Even when I watched this on the big screen in the theatres, I didn't notice the CGI for Gordon-Levitz' face, blending his with Willis' face.
But, I also wasn't expecting that to be possible (I might also have watched it in 3D). I think they may have blended their voices a bit, too.
Once Eric mentioned something weird about the face, it became obvious.
I think it was prostetics, so he can resemble Bruce Willis in his youth more.
@UCAO0sMiXEYC4Tz3jWZOiEHA Gordon-Levitt spent hour's every morning getting prosthetics applied to look like Willis, not cgi for Willis to look like Joseph.
Iirc it was both prosthetics and some cgi on Gordon-Levitt's face.