Solar 3.0: This New Technology Could Change Everything

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 มี.ค. 2022
  • Perovskite solar cells might revolutionize how humans generate energy from sunlight.
    brilliant.org/ElectricFuture
    First 200 people get 20% off annual premium subscription.
    In this video we'll explore the world's fastest improving new solar technology, and provide an exclusive peek inside the lab of a team working on this breakthrough material.
    Imagine an inexpensive solution of perovskite crystals that can make a photovoltaic cell so thin, that just half a cup of liquid would be enough to power a house. A solar panel so lightweight, that it can be balanced atop a soap bubble. That is known as the holy grail of solar energy. So when will we see perovskite solar panels used for a solar power system for your home? Maybe sooner than you expect.
    Currently, only 2% of global electricity comes from solar power. And 90% of that, comes from crystalline silicon-based solar panels, the dominant material technology.
    While abundant, silicon has downsides related to efficiency, manufacturing complexity, and pollution that prevent it from being an absolute no brainer. Emerging thin films like perovskites present a bright future. Imagine solar cars like a solar tesla, solar yachts, or a solar plane.
    Solar cell technologies can be classified into two categories, wafer-based or thin-film cells. Perovskites are the leading contender in emerging thin films. Topics covered in this video include applications, perovskite crystal structure, working principle of perovskite solar cells, efficiency limits, multi-junction solar cells, shockley-queisser limit, how solar works, solar simulator, band gap, manufacturing, vapor deposition, how solar panels are made, and the future of solar power.
    •✓
    Thanks:
    www.swiftsolar.com
    / animagraffs
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 4.1K

  • @Gengh13
    @Gengh13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2769

    It's nice that he was honest about the main disadvantage, longevity.

    • @stevencaskey7473
      @stevencaskey7473 2 ปีที่แล้ว +112

      They are getting better making them last. Stacking silicon with perovskite is one way. Also wider band or more light sensativite to other wavelengths. Looks very promising

    • @jkcleanenergyman6573
      @jkcleanenergyman6573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      I just got a patent on a new, non-variable clean energy concept. This video talks about some of the down sides of this technology. My concept may solve those issues. Do you know where I can contact them?

    • @bobsmith6544
      @bobsmith6544 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Did you notice the part about how they aren't as good as normal cells? LMFAO!

    • @AnalystPrime
      @AnalystPrime 2 ปีที่แล้ว +80

      @@bobsmith6544 People keep using "not as good" tech all the time. Like paying far more for maintenance and per mile just because ICE cars are little cheaper to buy and faster to refuel.
      These panels could deliver twice as much power as modern panels at far cheaper price, and because they can be lighter than the silicon panels they would also be cheaper to transport and easier to handle so even the most expensive part, the installation, could cost less. At lower price it is also viable to do things like putting panels on the walls or the less sunny side of the roof, so instead of paying $20k for a 10kW system you might get 25kW for $5k, at which price you would likely save money even if the panels had to be replaced every five years.

    • @michaelmoorrees3585
      @michaelmoorrees3585 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      It all boils down to cost. If its cheap enough, then it will be like getting your house repainted.
      In the past few years, traditional silicon panels have gotten down to ~70 cents a watt at retail prices. That's only $7000 for a 10KW installation. if you're a DYIer, you are no longer looking a a $20K+ installation. Inverters are cheap, and if you use forklift deep cycle lead acids, you can build your own "power wall", without subsidizing Elon Musk's lifestyle.

  • @Salticidaee
    @Salticidaee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Can't wait for season 17

  • @notDLD
    @notDLD 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    now to wait for Arc 3.0

  • @depressedyoshi1688
    @depressedyoshi1688 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    solar 3.0 next season they said...

  • @ooziepro
    @ooziepro 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    solar 3.0 confirmed for next season lets goooooo

  • @saumyacow4435
    @saumyacow4435 2 ปีที่แล้ว +127

    Hey I love that guy you interviewed being straightforward and honest. The big issue is stability and I'd love to find out more about that.

    • @williamyoung9401
      @williamyoung9401 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Remember when NASA did our experimentation and invented our new technology with billions invested in various projects, instead of grad students with delusions of grander?

    • @johnpeters6147
      @johnpeters6147 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yeah, I wish this channel went more in depth on the drawbacks instead of only highlighting the pros. Luckily the CEO was transparent and not overly enthusiastic since there are a lot of challenges to getting this tech widely accepted and implemented. I shouldn't have to go to the comment section to learn that the stability issue is that the cells degrade significantly in a couple of days. I shouldn't have to go to Google to learn that viable perovskite cells rely on lead. Also, in the video the film is thin enough where it is tinted and not translucent. How can they achieve >30% efficiency when much of the light is getting through? Are all of the numbers touted in terms of materials needed and efficiency consistent or based on different specifically tailored conditions? This is the kind of video where I am just frustrated that the author went the "research stretching the truth to gain investors" route instead of piggybacking off of the CEO grounding the tech in reality.

    • @ralstonrobertson6644
      @ralstonrobertson6644 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnpeters6147 As you astutely note in your comment, this is a marketing video and such things are done to attract venture capital, as depicted in the efficiency discussion. I appreciated the additional comments in your reply.

    • @sphong0610
      @sphong0610 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnpeters6147 The problem with PTF has been durability and deteriorating properties in real world use. This is something that we've been working on for over a decade and while there have been various different solutions, most of them take away from the properties that make PTF useful. Thus, any kind of method of reinforcing PTF makes them heavier, rigid, or more expensive. The lifespan being 5-20 times shorter counters the issue of resources used for production as well. We might get there some day, but PTF has a long way to go as a usable technology for any kind of hype to be built on it yet.

  • @Black-he7nz
    @Black-he7nz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This is not what I expected for Season 17 bungie...

  • @yubinsa
    @yubinsa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Now we are just waiting on Arc 3.0

  • @JerryNordstrom
    @JerryNordstrom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +518

    I truly appreciate the honesty in this video presentation. They ask hard questions and point out both the positive and negative attributes of this technology. Over 50 years of R and D with solar and we are still waiting for a significant break through. I do hope that Perovskites prove to be that breakthrough.... The solar cell and the battery still have a lot of improvements to go through before they become a viable, national energy sources.

    • @wybuchowyukomendant
      @wybuchowyukomendant 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Especially battery, EVs may run without burning any fuel, but making those batteries are as damaging to the ecosystem as running a regular car for quite some time.

    • @raiden000
      @raiden000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@wybuchowyukomendant Yep, people should learn to be more efficient rather than asking their tech to bend over backwards for them.

    • @Edwxrd69
      @Edwxrd69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Significant breakthrough? I think that’s called a solar panel, don’t think we had those in the 1800s

    • @mauritshagedorn856
      @mauritshagedorn856 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      i think its cool to think about that probably somewhere in my lifetime we have figured out how to provide plenty of energy to everyone on earth for cheap without destroying the planet. i am 20 btw if you are wondering.

    • @raiden000
      @raiden000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@mauritshagedorn856 We have plenty already, we need to stop being wasteful, but people need 70" TVs so im not holding my breath.

  • @michaelsparks3573
    @michaelsparks3573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +564

    Fantastic presentation on a solar technology I didn't even know existed. I always love hearing about newer and better technology. In my heart I know you'll solve the problems surrounding early degradation. Cheaper more cost effective so what's not to like? Scientists like yourself always amaze me. Thank you for everything you do to make this world a better place to live. Energy costs have a lot to do with making that happen. Know that you're very much appreciated!

    • @melb5996
      @melb5996 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would much rather hear about new and emerging technologies than “our planet is doomed “. Science will eventually ’crack’ nuclear fusion as long as the ‘net zero’ brigade don’t get in the way of progress.

    • @mercetajs
      @mercetajs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      totally agree with you... and making solar power cheaper and more effective is such a goood thing for 3rd world countries and all that... and tbh for everyone because smaller countries wouldnt be so dependent on bigger countries for power

    • @iphone-repair-fuengirola
      @iphone-repair-fuengirola 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I believe they will figure out what to cover this with and then preserve it for much longer my ideas would be silicone or plastic

    • @stevencaskey7473
      @stevencaskey7473 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Michael. Glad to ser you now watching the technology. Have bern watching and using solar from back in the 60s. Im so tired of the "i know it wont work" crowd. Things get better. Now we have cars tbat can be charged on solar panels. What is wrong eith these people.

    • @adamkowalski9007
      @adamkowalski9007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      invented in Poland, by a woman

  • @crabfella6645
    @crabfella6645 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    This was a great video. As someone who is going to college for materials science, it was cool to see the concepts brought up in ways that make it easy for a layperson to understand, and also very cool to see the guy from the company be honest about the downsides to perovskite solar cells.

    • @gussampson5029
      @gussampson5029 ปีที่แล้ว

      Materials science is definitely the best major to do some very positive good for the world right now. We'll watch your career with great interest... ☺️

  • @atsukana1704
    @atsukana1704 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Dude bungie’s rework is gonna change the world

  • @GiorgiaAngelia
    @GiorgiaAngelia 2 ปีที่แล้ว +867

    Extremely well explained and illustrated. Very easy to understand by anyone no matter the level of scientific knowledge. Well done and keep up the good work!

    • @ColdHawk
      @ColdHawk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Agreed - that was well explained. Actually it was well _taught!_

    • @unixtohack
      @unixtohack 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is and maybe it have some future… only humans are the problem...

    • @MDaVela
      @MDaVela 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@unixtohack those in power usually don't let tech like this on the market if it doesn't suit their ideas

    • @jorioaban2940
      @jorioaban2940 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      0@@ColdHawk

    • @tankahchoon2723
      @tankahchoon2723 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MDaVela maybe could done more then that right

  • @physanon5327
    @physanon5327 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This wasn't what i was after when I searched up Solar 3.0, but I'm glad I chose to watch it regardless. Great video!

    • @carterhutcheson8081
      @carterhutcheson8081 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Crazy to think this tech is less than a month away eh… it’s only gonna last for about a month as well and then we get arc 3.0. Crazy electrical advancements… LMAO

    • @gamechip06
      @gamechip06 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was searching for a comment like this
      PvP Next month is gonna be fun

  • @bigdonda
    @bigdonda 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Fantastic video, both your enthusiasm and optimism for this new developing technology radiated through the script!

  • @johnbyrom6568
    @johnbyrom6568 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I have been pro R and D on solar, but against mass implementation, as we are going too fast before the tech is ready on that scale. This could truly be a game changer. Keep the R and D going.

  • @nappy6806
    @nappy6806 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Cant wait for arc 3.0 now

  • @patfranks785
    @patfranks785 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Very well written piece. Twice, so far, he mentioned something I was questioning. This one was when he said the two chips were samples used in the lab. I was thinking when he first talked about them, they seem a lot closer than 10 years away.

  • @saadsheikh7197
    @saadsheikh7197 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I really hope solar 3.0 brings two icarus dashes back for pve atleast

  • @Begolden
    @Begolden 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    hiya, excellect video. Many thanks, as a follow up were there any relative articles I could use as a reference to my research paper?

  • @gernblenstein1541
    @gernblenstein1541 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Love it. Keep up the great work, brother.

  • @gregparrott
    @gregparrott 2 ปีที่แล้ว +155

    Mr. Jean does an excellent job of explaining Swift Solar's approach. I also appreciate his candor on his current priorities for scaling production, his manufacturing and testing methodologies, what the limitations currently are (longevity and environmental ruggedness), the current market applications, and his priorities in broadening its utility by addressing the longevity issues.

    • @donaldkasper8346
      @donaldkasper8346 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What is the current longevity? 5 days?

    • @davidconner-shover51
      @davidconner-shover51 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@donaldkasper8346 I think it's up to 60 these days

    • @donaldkasper8346
      @donaldkasper8346 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidconner-shover51 Nothing beats silver for conductivity.

  • @soundsmth9413
    @soundsmth9413 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    bungie is getting really creative with these subclass updates!

  • @schmeck35
    @schmeck35 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for asking all the right questions

  • @BritainRitten
    @BritainRitten 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Outstanding presentation. Super interesting details direct from the company, including their manufacturing process

  • @martiddy
    @martiddy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    The quality of the animations is amazing!, keep up the good content! 👍

    • @ElectricFuture
      @ElectricFuture  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      thanks to @animagraffs for that!

    • @williamyoung9401
      @williamyoung9401 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What are the challenges of bringing this future to light? Well, the person you interviewed is talking about the "Market," so you can see where his priorities lie...that's problem #1 right there...

  • @saskiavanhoutert6081
    @saskiavanhoutert6081 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this video and explantation, kind regards

  • @kirodon
    @kirodon ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’m currently doing the nabcep Solar course and this information was really helpful

  • @worldstarmusicinternationa1366
    @worldstarmusicinternationa1366 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wait… this is not Destiny

  • @biloz2988
    @biloz2988 2 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    The most beautiful thing in living long enough is that we see more new things and get the chance to use some of them. Who would have thought of such technology ?

    • @Lucas_Antar
      @Lucas_Antar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Joel Jean

    • @averagecommenter4623
      @averagecommenter4623 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Scientists and Engineers would have thought of such technology.

    • @elvirathon
      @elvirathon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      beautiful plastic in the ocean and our blood

    • @williamyoung9401
      @williamyoung9401 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Remember when we had government funding donate % of GDP and taxed billionaires to fund our future and new technology? What happened?

    • @JBulsa
      @JBulsa 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      God is said, "I am Sound and Light."

  • @bobscaping
    @bobscaping ปีที่แล้ว

    Well done video! Exciting future!! 😎

  • @carinesinclair3789
    @carinesinclair3789 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Energy from sunlight is a no brainer. Keep up the good work!

  • @AlexFoster2291
    @AlexFoster2291 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Awesome video. Keep up the good work

  • @leg1tgaming303
    @leg1tgaming303 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If it ain’t about my dawn blade idc lmao

  • @fredericp64
    @fredericp64 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent reporting thanks!!

  • @MTGPlayer10
    @MTGPlayer10 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This is definitely something I hope becomes commercially available soon because I inted to heat my house using Geo-thermal and I'd like Solar Panels (with w/e batteries I can get for energy storage for cold/night time usage) to be what is giving the geo-thermal unit all the energy it needs to operate at 100%. Not needing to burn wood or use oil/propane etc. is a dream of mine but living in NH I worry about how many solar panels I'll need to get so that (even in Winter time) I never have to worry about having enough power to run my geo-thermal unit. I haven't done any research into how much solar panels are going to cost me but, as long as I can afford it, I have no doubt I'll be needing dozens for year round powering/usage.

    • @rogerphelps9939
      @rogerphelps9939 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You will need 3kw for dark evenings and mornings. You would need at least three GTesla Powerwall equivalents.

  • @Drew_TheRoadLessTraveled
    @Drew_TheRoadLessTraveled 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Information well presented with a Refreshing "depth-investigation" for the novice. Easy to undrestand yet complex. Well Done.

  • @aaronprindle385
    @aaronprindle385 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Amazing video, thanks for this

  • @Merlin.Twiggles
    @Merlin.Twiggles 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing! Great work!

  • @miroslavradojcic5378
    @miroslavradojcic5378 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Keep up the good work!

  • @ralstonrobertson6644
    @ralstonrobertson6644 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    The initial video depicting the electron-hole interaction when the P and N-type materials are brought into contact was something you might consider donating to a University for the 1st course of Solid State Device physics. It would also be useful to incorporate the discussion of the Fermi level as part of the discussion to round out the band gap discussion. Good luck in your venture but many practical problems to overcome but your video shows you have a grasp of many such issues.

  • @TemdriWorld
    @TemdriWorld 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I need this for my van, as I am overlanding in Africa at the moment. I can even do some real world testing for them👊🏿👌🏿👍🏿

  • @akro80
    @akro80 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loved this video, very informative.. can you make one on semiconductors?

  • @dmfp
    @dmfp ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If the tech ever evolves to the point it needs to be...that would be awesome. Good luck!

  • @bhuppi13
    @bhuppi13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    From past few years, I've been hearing of things that will revolutionize power production. Yet to see even one available commercially.

    • @autohmae
      @autohmae 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Because price the existing products is low because of mass production it's really hard for a new product to get into a market. You first need to reach that price point. Very often a new product only succeeds because it has an advantage in an other area so it can be further developed and mass production processes improved.

    • @cooldog60
      @cooldog60 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      When all is said and done more is said than done.

    • @Sthasn
      @Sthasn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@autohmae or if you’re Tesla, you can out leverage the market with tax incentives and an army of redditors

    • @stevep8490
      @stevep8490 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What an ignorant comment lmao. Technology has exponentially advanced in a handful of generations. Flight, Cars, space probes, wireless communications and antibiotics were all advanced in same 200 year period lmao.
      You won't even be able to comprehend the next 50 years.

    • @sunny27jan
      @sunny27jan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Graphene is one of them you see in upcoming future.

  • @harbyvariah3030
    @harbyvariah3030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So informative and I didn't know there was better technology, instead of the existing solar panels systems.

  • @tyn999
    @tyn999 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting topic and well presented! Good job!

  • @mentaljewelry4698
    @mentaljewelry4698 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    A common problem with thin film types is that high temperatures cut the lifespan. For the western states silicon crystal holds up best, so far. If only they can come up with a thin film type that will stand up to extremes in temperature.

  • @acmefixer1
    @acmefixer1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    He said, "Stability is still a challenge..."
    IOW, the perovskites don't last very long, much less than 25 years. They won't be able to be used for rooftop or utility scale solar systems until their "stability" AKA lifetimes can be increased to 25 years.
    If perovskites can be made cheap enough, the sheets might be made to be quickly and easily changed when they lose efficiency.

    • @nftawes2787
      @nftawes2787 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      1/15 the cost seems to make up for the more limited lifespan.

    • @yade5979
      @yade5979 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Depends on how it gets used, i dont agree that we would need one or another, for long-living installations you could make solar cells like we have now, but for stuff where its a temporary set-up than this would be a massive success. The light weight and cheapness of the cell makes it perfect to be put on stop of cars, it would be a perfect addition to electric cars, and given that most cars are used during the day, i would say that a much much smaller battery could be out into such a car all in order to reduce weight and give a small timespan in order to go through moments of missing sunlight.
      This technology would be a godsend in areas where there is a lot of sunlight to begin with.
      On top of that, if they manage to scale it up and make it light-weight enough, they could even put it on clothes for induvidual uses, so your smartphones battery timespan wouldnt be the main concern of yours anymore, and a single piece of clothing usually isnt used for over 15 years , so the cell would be a great fit on that as well.
      And on many many other consumable goods this technology would be perfect, for example you want to go into the forest and relax but not miss out on the convenience of electrity, you could just bring a big piece of cloth which you span on a open field, than charge your devices via that.
      Maybe im a bit to positive on the good aspects of this technology, but i thing that given the trend to having more smart tools surrounding us, this technology would fit right into that market.

    • @jkcleanenergyman6573
      @jkcleanenergyman6573 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      So put them in a place where they won't be exposed to the outside elements and be temp controlled. I know that sounds crazy, but I have an idea (and a patent) if you want to know more, let me know.

    • @kly8105
      @kly8105 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Other companies have to intentionally bother making products obsolete over time, if this is both cheap and has a decent but not long longevity its not that big of a negative either, specially since there's manual labor involved (it might help sustain the market since more installations over time means more laborers supporting it to get more labor out of it).
      Not a fan of planned obsolence but still worth noting I think.

    • @Knightyme
      @Knightyme 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The life of these new panels vs silicon panels, assuming the 15x production saving = 1.66 years. so if the formula lasts 2 years before having to be replaced, that accounts for the cost of a worker to replace the panels, which after the initial install would be a 30-60 minute job of unscrewing one set of panels and screwing in the new set.
      Benefit being new formula(s) that might mean longer life and / or more power both of which are of benefit to the user. Loner life = less re-installs, more power = feeding more back to the grid for credit off the power bill.

  • @FlamingNinjaBoi
    @FlamingNinjaBoi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    "1% of the material compared to current cells, so it's gonna be cheaper!"
    Companies will still find a way to charge us double the cost of existing cells just because it's new.

    • @bad_p
      @bad_p 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      nobody works for free

    • @notjohndoe7130
      @notjohndoe7130 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      it cost less money to make but the companies had to invest millions of dollars to develop the technology

    • @faikerdogan2802
      @faikerdogan2802 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Then they will fail. Basic free market outcomes

    • @FlamingNinjaBoi
      @FlamingNinjaBoi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@faikerdogan2802 It's not a free market, so I have some serious doubts.
      How much do you know about the health care industry? Lmao.

    • @FlamingNinjaBoi
      @FlamingNinjaBoi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bad_p Don't even know what you're trying to say here, lol.

  • @RobertGercia
    @RobertGercia ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm feeling a lot intelligent compared to yesterday. cool video!

  • @jimlahey5354
    @jimlahey5354 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video! More videos on solar power please!!

  • @caseygruman7245
    @caseygruman7245 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I appreciate the level of transparency (ha!) In this video.
    It didn't feel like hype and lies, but realistic expectations.

  • @garyhughes4326
    @garyhughes4326 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Given time and further R & D this science has huge potential. These people deserve further funding and encouragement to advance their research. It is mind boggling to imagine the possibilities that await us with this possible breakthrough

    • @nabirasch5169
      @nabirasch5169 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dunno. Mokes do pretty dumb stuff with technology. Look how everybody whips their cell phone out to do a video of the most pointless stuff. Overkill.

    • @garyhughes4326
      @garyhughes4326 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@imacmill Maybe you are right. But I tend to have faith in the race that sometime, somewhere down the track we will wake up to ourselves and reverse the trend of self distruction.
      What gives me this hope are people like Elon Musk and others that have the dreams of creating a civilisation "out there". Thus giving us a second chance.
      We are not the first civilisation that has achieved remarkable things and than disappeared from the face of the planet. This phenonomen has been repeated over and over, probably several times in the planets history.
      As horrible as what it sounds, we need to cull the race one way or the other, be it by war or natural disaster.
      We are a parasitic and warlike species that needs to be taught a good lesson before we will wake up to ourselves.

  • @craigallen111
    @craigallen111 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really great video thank you

  • @tekkas4
    @tekkas4 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    very well explained hope to see more news soon :D

  • @AdrienBurg
    @AdrienBurg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +179

    This got me much more interested and educated than severals hours our lessons on perovskites for material science. I was surprised there was no mention of the Lead (Pb) as most issues with perovskites used to be that we didn't know how to do lead-free perovskites crystals. I would have liked to know more about the toxicity of these coatings

    • @dunhillsupramk3
      @dunhillsupramk3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      you want to know about the toxicity of lead coatings: lead = bad... thats all... despite any any precaution taken or how its engineered it will ALWAYS be a problem

    • @primetime0104
      @primetime0104 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Pb = lawsuits

    • @kiloton1920
      @kiloton1920 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Can confirm it is highly toxic

    • @mauritshagedorn856
      @mauritshagedorn856 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@kiloton1920 did lead not cause humanity to drop significant iq points, and caused some generations to be way more violant and stuff? very fascinating in my oppinion, scary, but fascinating.

    • @kiloton1920
      @kiloton1920 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mauritshagedorn856 yes and it still is doing this in some countries that still use leaded gasoline

  • @davidboyle1902
    @davidboyle1902 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Make the sheets easily replaceable and using them will follow. And from that will come the data to iterate the various components. Promising work.

    • @sparkey4293
      @sparkey4293 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes they can make lemonaid with these short lived cells and as improvements are developet they can be implemented.

    • @EddyKorgo
      @EddyKorgo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Easy. Make a frame that covers the roof and have these panels just snap to a frame (plug'n'play) once the panel degrades, unplug and plug new panel. Any panels can be easily swapped with new generation panels

    • @kristopherleslie8343
      @kristopherleslie8343 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EddyKorgo not easy

    • @CD-vb9fi
      @CD-vb9fi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kristopherleslie8343 It is easy. What you mean is that it is not easy to work through the politics of getting it done. That is the hard part.

    • @dongshengdi773
      @dongshengdi773 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CD-vb9fi Hambug ! ! !
      Science is So haughty claiming We are almost at the verge of discovering the Theory of everything 😂😂😂
      We can't Even copy the sun's fusion nor kill a virus or a simple cancer .

  • @dmgreenw
    @dmgreenw 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was awesome! Good job!

  • @benthere8051
    @benthere8051 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Graphene could serve as the transparent electrode. Graphene is almost a one-atom-thick superconductor and can be applied using chemical vapor deposition (CVD). CVD is currently the front running process for making graphene.
    Even though there may be lifetime limitations for Perovskite solar cells, they are so cheap to make and produce so little pollution, they can be considered disposable.

    • @liammurphy2725
      @liammurphy2725 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Disposable? It wouldn't be long till your fish steak tasted of Perovskite.

    • @zbigniew2628
      @zbigniew2628 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great graphene... Worse polluter than plastic. It's like micro glass polluting water.

  • @AWanderingSwordsman
    @AWanderingSwordsman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    This was a good video and I'm especially happy you went into the challenges it faces although I always end up frustrated not really understanding how they go about improving the poor aspects. Like, what specifically allows for one of these substances to be more durable to heat and how do they go about trying find it?
    I also find it sort of alarming that this crystalline structure was just found in nature rather than come up with. Is it possible theres an even better structure and wouldn't trying to optimize that be the most important step. I mean, it's possible that all this research into perovskite's becomes useless if some better structure is found so shouldn't we first develop the science around finding the best structure?

    • @donatoge1713
      @donatoge1713 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      so i would advise some Real science courses... learn some chemistry and physics....but typically its about finding a material, or creating one that suits the need better. Only quite rarely is there truly only one substance that will work for a given need, but how well it works, or its cost, or potential environmental concerns.... ect., determine what substances are actually used.
      We used to use lead as a fixative in paints, in pipes carrying water and many other items. Until many people had succumbed to lead poisoning, we were not aware of the health issues, and lead worked cheaply and well. After learning about the issues, we switched to other materials, some of these alternatives were already used somewhat. But lead was still being used in paints until like the 80's....partially because alternative materials cost more.
      Lead based paints no longer dominate the market because better paint types were developed, and at reasonable costs, else we likely still would have lead paint in our homes schools and hospitals.

    • @AWanderingSwordsman
      @AWanderingSwordsman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@donatoge1713 I mean I understand that, I just don't understand what they do to find or create these better materials. How can the process be sped up.

  • @qbeck11
    @qbeck11 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Cool to see more efficient solar power models being researched. Finding efficiency is the crux of engineering.

  • @FightersFireAK47WonWar
    @FightersFireAK47WonWar ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi there, I have never seen
    like this before. Looks like it
    will be very useful for the
    future.

  • @RabiyyahBadruddin
    @RabiyyahBadruddin ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is genius and will quickly be adapted to many industrial fabric uses! I am amped!!

  • @Factnomenal
    @Factnomenal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Great info guys!

  • @bruceohl407
    @bruceohl407 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That young man is so inspiring in his explanation. Give another nudge of hope for that generation. Keep it up young man.

  • @gamemasteraj05
    @gamemasteraj05 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Love the simplicity yet the complexity in his explanations. Can’t wait to see what happens next.
    Q: Could Vanta black with is light adsorption affect the efficiency of the tandem and attract more sunlight to the tandem while finding a solution that will dissipate heat away from the tandem bc vanta black absorbs almost all light therefore I’m thinking heat too.

    • @BingusDingusJohnson
      @BingusDingusJohnson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hey bro, not trying to be an arse here but could you maybe check your spelling?
      Sorry

    • @gamemasteraj05
      @gamemasteraj05 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BingusDingusJohnson edited

    • @TheMostSLENDERking
      @TheMostSLENDERking 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BingusDingusJohnson
      Affect 🔄 Effect
      I get it

    • @utubestalker.dotcom
      @utubestalker.dotcom ปีที่แล้ว +5

      uh oh ish de spelling polece! evrybudy hide 👀

    • @rinkleac95
      @rinkleac95 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Actually , the main reason they want to make it transparent is for heat absorption to be low. Current solar panel has a black surface which actually absorb heats towards earth which is bad as we do not want it to hear our planet, instead we want it to reflect it back outside of our planet.
      That is why they do not consider it to be black. I hope this helps.

  • @CherokezPittman
    @CherokezPittman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow, renewable energy is such an important topic! I recently came across the Segway Portable PowerStation Cube Series and it seems like a fantastic option for outdoor enthusiasts like us. With its massive capacity, waterproof technology, and fast recharging capabilities, it could be a great solution for camping or as a backup power source for our RV. Definitely worth considering!

  • @marklandgraf7667
    @marklandgraf7667 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "What if I told you about a...." Yeah, extreme distrust mode activated.

  • @gregriley1708
    @gregriley1708 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I could see huge success with this marketed as a DIY kit. This could revolutionize our green economy, giving financial incentive to those of us who are handy with diy projects.

  • @EndDayz
    @EndDayz ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing presentation

  • @mscir
    @mscir ปีที่แล้ว

    Really good work! Impressive.

  • @peoplez129
    @peoplez129 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You'd "only" need 100x100 miles of solar panels...not accounting for weather conditions, power storage, power transfer, growing demand, maintenance, etc. You'd also need batteries the size of city skyscrapers....a whole city of them. You'd also need to replace ALL of that every 10-20 years.

    • @jonathanday4553
      @jonathanday4553 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or we can use ground juice that burns away and dosent come back. You pick nimrod.

    • @jonathanday4553
      @jonathanday4553 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Life itself starts solar powered but you want all the good stuff for yourself with no respect to the actual cost of the fuel you are burning. Get fucked

    • @peoplez129
      @peoplez129 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jonathanday4553 There's enough ground juice to fuel our civilization for the next 100,000 years, if not more. And we will ALWAYS use oil, because we use it for more than fuel. We will never stop using oil. Average oil well is 6K ft deep. Deepest is 40K ft deep. There's a LOT of oil. And it's not localized to specific areas. Everywhere on earth, there's oil, if you dig deep enough. Guess what the byproduct of burning gas are? Carbon and water. It's one of the greenest fuel sources in the world....too green for the greedy people in power, so they want to make it seem not so green so they can sell you other things and rob you of wealth. And since we're already on the cusp of fusion, this is all moot anyways. When something better comes along, you don't have to force it like they're doing now with wind and solar. If it was really soo great, it would have already won out.

    • @jonathanday4553
      @jonathanday4553 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@peoplez129 the world has 47 years left of proven reserves at the current rate of consumption. I've never heard of your 100,000, year figure. I'd argue the cows we consume are more of a environmental problem than oil. But I'm listening.

    • @jonathanday4553
      @jonathanday4553 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@peoplez129 I listened. I'll keep what you said in mind.

  • @Liberty4Ever
    @Liberty4Ever 2 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    Great video! Not the typical huckster new technology magic video with impossible promises while glossing over potential problems, and not dumbed down to be 98% fact free. I can imagine perovskite solar incorporated into an injection molded plastic enclosure for various products such as outdoor motion controlled security lighting, displays and signage, security cameras.... It would also be great to be able to buy pre-cut rolls of solar film that could be rolled onto a metal or polymer roof, between the strengthening ribs, to quickly produce a solar roof that inexpensive and efficient.

    • @dongshengdi773
      @dongshengdi773 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MyKharli this is old technology, have you seen the Knight Rider 2000?
      it is coated with this solar film .

    • @RIZFERD
      @RIZFERD 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      New SolarPanel technology now we can attach the thin layer panel on car's body just like applying vinyl wrapping so no worrying battery to empty as we can charge battery anywhere even while parking in full sun light

    • @slowanddeliberate6893
      @slowanddeliberate6893 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The technology sounds like it can be applied to the outside of smartphones.
      People buy a new smartphone every 2-5 years.

  • @himashreebhattacharyya6094
    @himashreebhattacharyya6094 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very well explained

  • @thefishinggamekeeper5713
    @thefishinggamekeeper5713 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am excited to see where this goes and really want to even be able to create one of these items. Seems nice. Very nice. Just need the knowledge of how they work and how to wire them.

  • @SimonAmazingClarke
    @SimonAmazingClarke 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I like the idea of buildings producing its own electricity. This can be used for both the operation of the building as well as charging workers cars etc. The main advantage is that this energy doesn't come from the grid. In fact it can top the grid up.

    • @markbooth3066
      @markbooth3066 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It always irritates me when I see office buildings with window darkening film. They reduce the light by about the same amount as BIPV (building integrated Photovoltaic) panels I was working on in the early 2000's, but generate heat rather than electricity. *8'(

    • @markbooth3066
      @markbooth3066 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The average high rise office block has way more non north facing window square footage than it has roof space, and roof space is often filled with air-conditioning units for the block.

  • @jschall12
    @jschall12 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am working with a few groups developing and testing perovskite research cells and mini modules at NREL. There has been a lot of momentum (money) behind this as the new OPV, and efficiencies have shot up quickly. I see some of the newest devices from universities and startups.. there is still a long way to go for stability of these modules and materials

    • @rodolfomolano984
      @rodolfomolano984 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's interesting work you do. I am a electrician in the great state of Texas and for the past year i have been working for a master electrician installing solar. We do the whole system modules and the solar walls I like the work and I'm really interested in solar. Really looking forward to lighter modules cause carrying them on a roof is a work out.

    • @spskynyc
      @spskynyc 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      NREL has an incubator for the R&D of solar and Geo
      Would be interesting to see how these are plausible in aero projects. Food for thought

  • @DerrtyRidhey
    @DerrtyRidhey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can't wait for this tech to be widely available

  • @matthewwalter5810
    @matthewwalter5810 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic information outlining "Great Things to Come!" - Can anyone tell me where the image from 0:04 seconds in is from? The hills plastered with solar? Thank You!

  • @markbooth3066
    @markbooth3066 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When I was working on machines to laser scribe thin film solar panels in the early naughties, all people were talking about was getting the cost down to $1/watt, we hoped thin film was the way we would achieve that, but economics of scale have meant that monocrystalline cells dropped in price far more rapidly than anyone imagined, pricing out cheaper, but lower efficiency, thin film technologies, even Cadmium Telluride (which was horrid to work with, ask and I'll tell you about the extraction system we built).
    It's really great to see new options, and perhaps Perovskites are the way to bring thin film and BIPV back to the forefront, if the logevity problems can be solved, but even if they can, industry is slow to adopt technologies that don't have a long history already, so I wouldn't be surprised if we had to wait another decade for Perovskites to make any significant market impact.

    • @JorgetePanete
      @JorgetePanete 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      the early naughties ༼ •́ ͜ʖ •̀ ༽

    • @markbooth3066
      @markbooth3066 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Some say noughties, but I think naughties is funnier. *8')

  • @Vondruke
    @Vondruke 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    At a 1/15th cost of solar panels, at 20 year lifespan seems reasonable at least on a consumer level which are more less the same life span as most current solar panel tech, let alone roofs, vehicles, and most applications. It seems that really isn't an issue. And if it's better for the environment with more abundment materials cost.. it seems like they're almost ready to launch.

  • @onepoormofo8733
    @onepoormofo8733 ปีที่แล้ว

    Arc 3.0 will be fun good work bungie

  • @govindjayakumar
    @govindjayakumar ปีที่แล้ว

    Hopefully this makes it to fruition

  • @scottscott3463
    @scottscott3463 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I look forward to seeing Perovskite solar cells becoming main stream, and hopefully bringing down the cost of solar cell, and improving efficiency on energy generation. It will certainly benefit alot of people then, from all walks of life.

    • @datcheesecakeboi6745
      @datcheesecakeboi6745 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They literally break down to anything even extended exposure to sunlight

    • @ubuu7
      @ubuu7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I want to see an electric RV with the entire surface covered by these cells as body cladding, and a rollable shade also covered with them for even more surface area. How much charge could you get if you were not merely limited to some solar cells on top, but covering the entire surface? Same for the windows, get some that collect some of the light and convert some into power.

    • @DennisTran20
      @DennisTran20 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@datcheesecakeboi6745 à

    • @datcheesecakeboi6745
      @datcheesecakeboi6745 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ubuu7 not alot more realisticly

    • @GjaP_242
      @GjaP_242 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The global Perovskite solar cell market size was valued at $0.4 billion in 2020, and is forecasted to reach $6.6 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 32.4% from 2021 to 2030. Perovskite solar cell (PSC) includes the perovskite-structured material as an active layer based on the solution processed by tin or halide.
      Allied Market Research

  • @johnfoot2984
    @johnfoot2984 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Massive cool ! It was interesting to hear that production costs can be greatly reduced but you can bet your life when this technology hits the market it will be more expensive to the consumer than currently available solar panels.

    • @jacek-jan
      @jacek-jan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes and no
      Yes, they would be more expensive for the same area than standard PV silicone based panels. but they will have different factor, so they will be still be competitive in price.

  • @Azazl187
    @Azazl187 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm not sure how I ended up here but this vid was very informative. I've learned alot

  • @petera.watters4459
    @petera.watters4459 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I read about BAND GAP tech about 20 years ago. Technology takes time and a ton of effort. Excited to see where this will go!

  • @tri3dtips
    @tri3dtips 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent presentation. I can't wait to see Perovskite become commercially available for use.

  • @ToastedSynapseGaming
    @ToastedSynapseGaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Pretty awesome technology that I had no idea existed until this video. I just thought "great, we have solar panels, so just get more, right?", well apparently we can also get better ones. And for various applications, not just fields powering the grid.
    The next step in all of this is to also find a way to make "better" batteries instead of just getting "more" of them.
    Tech is definitely advancing and I'm glad you guys are covering it on the channel :)

    • @Dragonorder18
      @Dragonorder18 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Battery Recycling might be just a good a program to have investment in too. batteries might never be eternal, but getting more materials back ought to be a huge deal.

    • @peejae082004
      @peejae082004 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Dragonorder18 i just discovered Ambri the other day, this was their main selling point for their liquid metal batteries - reusability of materials

    • @eventhisidistaken
      @eventhisidistaken 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Battery tech continues to improve. But for grid usage, batteries are probably not the best solution. The best solution for grid storage might be mechanical or conversion to hydrocarbons (which can then be used in applications where electric doesn't work well, such as heavy machinery and air travel). You can use electricity and water to pull CO2 directly out of the atmosphere and create e-diesel with it, which when burned, releases only the same CO2 you previously pulled out, so overall neutral to atmospheric CO2 concentrations.

    • @dongshengdi773
      @dongshengdi773 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Dragonorder18 this is old technology, have you seen the Knight Rider 2000?
      it is coated with this solar film .

    • @Yeet42069
      @Yeet42069 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eventhisidistaken With the amount of energy you need to "pull" enough CO2 directly out of the atmosphere you might as well be burning forests down for the hell of it. Ideas are fun and all but not in the realm of ridiculousness.

  • @sumit3506
    @sumit3506 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Void 3.0 was pretty good excited for arc and solar!

  • @nunyadambusiness3530
    @nunyadambusiness3530 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One year later we've skyrocketed to 15% renewables. we've got this yall! just keep doing the hard work.

  • @PokemonGOGreece
    @PokemonGOGreece 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    as an environmental engineer its like im watching a MAGIC video. Also some other guys tried to make panels working with moonlight (very primal stages)
    I wish we spread-expand the production and usage worldwide and as soon as possible..

    • @harrywalker968
      @harrywalker968 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      environmental engineer.. so your responsible for costing the earth billions, in new tech,,solar, wind, ev,s, that dont work. just cost billions to produce & re cycle, if ,,possible, which some cant be. 100 % loss.. ever heard of lpg. its a waste product.. no new tech required.. we pay $2.30 LT for it,. but its sold to other countries for less than 10c LT,,delivered.. yup,,green is a giant rip off.. scam.. we only have nuke reactors, for the military,,nothing wrong with salt..banned in 1956.. all you type people, are in a boys club, band wagon,, just agree.. your the reason why we are thousands of yrs behind in tech..

  • @bigedslobotomy
    @bigedslobotomy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    These videos about “new developments” are always interesting, but I’ve learned to take them with a big grain of salt. I used to subscribe to Popular Science back in the 1970s, 80s and 90s and they’d always be showcasing some new technology, only to have it completely disappear after that. There are SO MANY things that can derail a technology. Not only does it have to work, it has to be fairly easy to manufacture, it has to be cost effective, it has to be financed and promoted correctly, it has to pass the myriad EPA regulations, and today it has to be recyclable (otherwise the disposal costs become prohibitive. A good example of how a technology can make a wrong turn, is the straight screwdriver and the Phillips screwdriver. Back in the day, they were both competing for the emerging consumer tool market, but the developer of the Phillips screwdriver wanted more money than the straight screwdriver did, and so most people chose the straight edged screwdriver. It wasn’t until much later that the Phillips got any traction.

    • @katesisco
      @katesisco 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly, we public are easily enamored of the 'discoveries' that have yet to be producible due to cost, restrictions, etc., only t discover that the corporates are continuing dangerous and toxic energy productions. The last year has seen global corporates invade the Polish market imposing a dangerous nuclear facility to be constructed on the Baltic, and massive military weapons productions on former farm land used for wineries, etc.

    • @frebb9270
      @frebb9270 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah ive seen so many new technologys end up in dropshipping products if you know what i mean

  • @MediaArchitectsOrg
    @MediaArchitectsOrg ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is science presented in a journalistic style; the advantages and challenges, for the thinking person. Fascinating! Hopeful technology toward renewable energy for sure!

  • @lynnjackson462
    @lynnjackson462 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy is adorable!! I've seen him in Palo Alto (is my home)😊 plus he's brilliant!

  • @basspig
    @basspig 2 ปีที่แล้ว +93

    One way to improve solar panel efficiency is to install blocking diodes between each of the solar modules within the panel. Conventional panels when just one of 60 sells is shaded will reduce output by as much as 50%. This is because the shade itself becomes a load on all the cells that are receiving sun and the energy is diverted. Blocking diode to prevent the solar cells that are in sunlight from feeding back into the Shaded solar cell.

    • @alokverma3311
      @alokverma3311 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      yeah ..nice explantation ....but now a days the solar cells on the modules is devided in to two parts so that if shadow came then this not effect the entire efficiency of module. this technique is genrally use for module powers are arround 400 watt or more than this.

    • @basspig
      @basspig 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@alokverma3311 Good to know. I'm experiencing this issue with 240W panels. 60 cells. Cover 1/2 of one of the cells and power drops from 180W to 80W. It's really shocking how little obscuration can cut way down the output.

    • @mverheul6235
      @mverheul6235 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Bypass diodes are very common nowadays in solar panels

    • @wes326
      @wes326 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@basspig 80 is not much less than 50% of 180.

    • @basspig
      @basspig 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@wes326 it's way out of proportion to the area blocked (1%) though. So if those offline shaded cells were isolated by diodes, it would help hugely.

  • @Jack_Wolfe
    @Jack_Wolfe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    10:40 So could you make cylinders with one way mirror surfaces facing into the center? and would that work/let the energy reflect back into the cell or just heat up the cylinder?

    • @aidanmattson681
      @aidanmattson681 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It depends on the mirror. If it’s reflective in IR then it will be more efficient.

  • @user-xn9ft1le8w
    @user-xn9ft1le8w 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Might be interesting to add an electret below the solar cell to change the band gap of the semiconductor junction.
    Also a thermoelectric layer below the solar cell cooled by water could increase efficiency and provide free hot water at the same time. Best wishes for success.

  • @chirpie11
    @chirpie11 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very excited about seeing work being done to make solar thinner and more efficient. I’m not a scientist, but have thought about this type of “panel” for phones, drones, cars and more would be great! A s solar Silpat mat!