Hey Adrian - thanks so much for the review and feedback. We now offer an updated RX3 FreeStanding Rack 3000 that utilizes 1" holes with 2" spacing, some major quality updates, the ability to do both 2:1 and 1:1 weight ratios, and spotter arms that insert from the front and rotate 90 degrees to lock in (with a nice, rounded chrome pin that'll never chip your powder-coat). The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout. Looking forward to your review on our updated RX3 series : )
I wish more companies would have the option for either 2:1 or 1:1. As far as I know, you are the only ones doing this on a single upright in a 3x3 build.
@@GlucksGym I have a feeling that TH-cam would demonetize you for that. Though based on some of the videos that pop up on TH-cam I'm not certain that's the case.
Came to this video late as I was looking for a power rack/functional trainer hybrid. I was wondering if you'd looked into the RX3 TORNADO RACK from Get RXd? It appears to be the regular RX3 power rack setup but with some new attachment cable arms so they sit out far further than the traditional ones. The original rack - out of stock by the way - system had duel cables so you could do 2:1 or 1:1 on a single stack which was nice in it's own way even if it looked weird, but I'm having trouble finding any reviews for either that aren't from the company. The RX3 series uses the standard hole size and spacing all the way up unlike the rack in this video as well. Wanting to see what others say before deciding if I go with them or another brand.
Thanks for doing this! I’ve been looking at this one for awhile because of the price point but have been hesitant because no one has done a review of it!
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
Great review. I bought a budget plate loaded version similar to this from walmart (I cant post links, but title is "Mikolo Power Cage, Squat Rack with Dual Pulley Cable Crossover System, Multifunction Free Weight Home Gym Workout Machine with Attachments"). I am waiting on box 2 of 2 to be delivered to be able to set it up and use it, but I would love to see you review it.
For your next review, they came out with a new version that is basically a regular 3x3 1in upright, but option to use 1:1 pulley ratio. It still seems better priced than athena and is more like the Dane from Fringe, but a 200lb stack with ability to use the whole stack is pretty sweet.
The RX3 3000 cable towers and racks feature ability to do both 2:1 and 1:1 weight ratios! And we'll be releasing many more products in the RX3 ecosystem (1" hole 2" spacing, black e-coat hardware, chrome where powdercoat might scratch, etc) that are geared towards home gym owners!
@@GlucksGymI look forward to that review. With a 1:1, it seems like you could use one side as a full lat pulldown, low row. But, unlike the Dane, you get the lighter starting weight of a 2:1. In your review, please give appropriate time to evaluating this functionality, and whether you can get a full stretch for pull downs.
I pre ordered the Ares when it first was announced and I absolutely love it. The 2.0 is going to be even better. Buy once cry once. Get the REP ARES or ATHENA.
Basement Brandon has one I think he'll be reviewing. I'm not quite sure I have the space to start covering combos and it matches his training style much better than mine.
As someone with a Get Rx'd squat rack, I can address the hole situation a bit. If you go their page you'll see that the racks are just part of a larger modular system for building things like ninja gyms. If you want to go full Lincoln logs it's awesome. When you want to add a third party attachment? Not so much. I love it because I got it locally, but it's definitely something to consider with their products.
Yes it's compatible within their own ecosystem as I showed in this vid but the standard sizes were set well before their system came out. It's a way to cut on costs some and if you start within their ecosystem it's great but it can get weird outside of it
Thanks for helping explain! We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing too and has the ability to do both 2:1 and 1:1 weight ratios! Come by the showroom if you'd like to see it in person!
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios! The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
Great review! I hope they change the hole spacing and switch to using 1” holes and hardware everywhere in the future. Adopting this feels like you end up locked in without a compelling reason. I do like how the storage shelves attach better than Rep’s with the Athena.
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios! The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
@@fwiffo42 We will be sending a FreeStanding Rack 3000 (uses our cable tower 3000s to build it) to Gluck for a review in the next couple weeks! We're also planning to release other unique rack configurations in our RX3 series in the next couple weeks as well - there'll be one with a smith machine and tornado pivot arms (like freemotion functional trainer arms)
The wife and I have a half rack in the garage and man I’d love to work in a lat pulldown cable stack. It’s a very important lift that I’m missing and pull ups are a bit out of my range still lol 😂
Thorough review my guy! Looks like a cost saving measure of not using true 1 inch hardware up top and bottom. Also, the trolley definitely needs to be a pop-pin system. Overall, for the price compared to REP, it does have some merit.
Yeah it surprised me some. I think if I weren't looking to expand off it (though that can be done in their ecosystem) the cost savings would be very tempting.
Starting to wonder if I'm the Get Rx'd shill here, but as an owner of one of their racks the holes are so it's compatible with their entire Builder system. People use it to build out stuff like ninja gyms. Rad for that, bummer when you try to add a Dialed Motion attachment...
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios! And yes, it uses a pop pin on the trolley too! The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
Just FYI, the whole wider functional trainer providing a better "stretch" on the pecs during a fly is actually a common misconception. Tension is maximized on the pecs when the cables form a 90° angle with your hands (also applies to almost every cable exercise). Your pecs are also stretched only in the bottom/start position when you have the hands out wide, at the top they are contracted and at their most shortened when you bring your hands together (i.e. not stretched). So... to actually maximize the stretch in a cable chest fly you'd want the cable positioned directly behind your hands to form a 90° angle with your body while in that bottom stretched position. For most people this would be right around their wingspan during the fly, if not a little narrower since most should be able to slightly angle their arms behind their body to get a maximum stretch in the pecs. A cable setup that is wider than your wingspan actually reduces the tension in the stretch on the pecs. The wider it gets, the more the peak tension moves towards the top squeeze position which is the opposite of a better "stretch" that most people talk about. Thus, a functional trainer or all-in-one rack around 40" to 50" wide is actually pretty great for maximizing tension in the stretch position to actually get a stretch on the chest for most people unless you have an abnormally large or small wingspan during the fly! Coincidentally, the latest research is actually also showing that prioritizing tension in a deep stretch position for most muscles is likely the best for muscle growth as well.
I feel like I've made so many jokes and comments about fly width that I'm running out of ways to say it's not as important as some people make it out to be.
Also, you can (and should) always play with elbow angle to create the best tension for you. It's all about figuring out how YOU can use it best. Great review! Thank you.
What is the actual distance in depth from the wall with the weight and storage shelves? The measurements in the video showed 31 inches, but not sure if that included the distance necessary for shelves, and for the weights on the outside horns? Thanks, it was a great video
We now offer an RX3 spotter arm that inserts from the front, also has a nice rounded chrome pin to prevent any powder coat chips! Compatible with both our RX3 series and our Builder series!
This channel is awesome, should be getting more views. The rack is good but incompatibility with other brands is a deal breaker for me, every other manufacturer has always something better than the other and you need it to be compatible with your rack to make it future proof.
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios! The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
It seems odd that other import companies don't make their hole spacing match to the leading companies. I see a lot of people buying the discounted FT and adding premium attachments. Seems like a pretty cool option overall.
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios! The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
I have an 8'x13' space, how would outfit that space? I don't know whether it would be better to have a RM-3 and a Torque Anker 7 or get a Rogue FM-HR Twin stack...? How annoying would adding/ removing J-Cups and Spotter Arms every time I wanna use the functional trainer?
Also, this does not seem to require front support footings, which is something that Rep recommends when getting the 4 post,. Your review indicated that the floor support arms were not necessary. The entire depth of the system is something that is important as my depth space is limited.
Depth depends on how you install the shelves (there's 2 positions for each) and which shelves you buy (they're not included). Flat shelf goes back the furtherest at a maximum of 5.75". The plate coaster (one I have installed at floor level) is about the same with bumpers on it and it installed in the forward position like I have it. Rack (4 post) without front feet is just under 36" deep. This does not include any shelves. Front feet are another 22.5".
@@kellyreyher3437 crap... I'm sorry I thought you were commenting on our Fringe Sport Dane Rack review which is similar to this. Those measurements are from that rack and completely useless to you. Unfortunately I don't have this rack anymore. I had to sell it to make space for the next one.
Great review, I never would have noticed that issue with their spotter arms. Their website sucks though. It's not very clear on what the options actually are.
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios! The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout. And, we're working on a new website!
Gluck did you ever use Rogue's Slinger system? They were one of the first with the concept but didn't quite nail it, and now are trying to play catch up
Hey, I'm just curious if you've ever given some thought to people who buy exceedingly cheap equipment. For instance I myself have gotten purely ~1 inch (28mm, 29mm, 30mm, etc.) plates from a dozen companies and dirt cheap bars from companies like KSport and Gorilla Sports. Do you ever think about those in any, way, shape or form or have an opinion on them? Asking since I'm in a more poor part of Europe and these do the job excellently well, given, I don't lift that much, but people have done greater things with less. Just curious what your take on it is and if you will ever review something like this - it'd be interesting to go DIRT CHEAP on equipment and see how it fares for a while.
The compatibility issues would be the deal breaker for me. I want to be able to buy nearly any 3x3 1" attachment without worrying about whether it will work (besides a little expected slop when using Imperial 3x3 attachments on metric racks).
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios! The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
Hello! Nice video review! What attachment/device are you using at 0:11 to connect both the cables to do those lat pulldowns? I couldn't find that one on the website in the videos description!
The steel tubing is imported. It's 75mmx75mm, but the advertise it as 3x3. Almost all companies import their tubing, with Rogue being a notable exception. As rogue uses American tubing, it is a true 3x3.
Builder system. Check out the insane ninja gyms people make the the Get Rx'd stuff. Downside is that it made it impossible to use the Dialed Motion system
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios! The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
The footprint is a little smaller because the storage doesn't stick off the back much like Rep's and it's cheaper but Rep's PR 5000 (or 4000) with dual Athenas is the nicer of the two.
Not a fan of the odd hole spacing at the top. Like, why be cheap? Also those spotter arms. lol. If they can’t get the basics right, I’m not going to spend thousands on their rack. Pass for me.
I have their power rack and I find it frustrating because of this. The holes are also not spaced apart the same as Rogue and Rep Fitness racks, so not all attachments fit.
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios! And, the RX3 spotter arms now insert from front and rotate 90 degrees to lock in. The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
2.0 is available now. We now offer an updated RX3 FreeStanding Rack 3000 that utilizes 1" holes with 2" spacing, other design/quality updates, the ability to do both 2:1 and 1:1 weight ratios The HRFTS-4000 is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
These all in one racks get too busy for my taste. I like to superset and with this you often have to disassemble everything to switch exercise. I am looking at a stand alone functional trainer to supplement my rack.
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios! The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios! The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
‘And when you’ve got 2 holes this close together, it’s sometimes hard to know which one you’re putting it into’
~Gluck
Hey Adrian - thanks so much for the review and feedback. We now offer an updated RX3 FreeStanding Rack 3000 that utilizes 1" holes with 2" spacing, some major quality updates, the ability to do both 2:1 and 1:1 weight ratios, and spotter arms that insert from the front and rotate 90 degrees to lock in (with a nice, rounded chrome pin that'll never chip your powder-coat).
The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
Looking forward to your review on our updated RX3 series : )
I wish more companies would have the option for either 2:1 or 1:1. As far as I know, you are the only ones doing this on a single upright in a 3x3 build.
@@balboa0621 You are correct! And, we just sent a cable tower 3000 out to Gluck for a review! 😁
The RX3 line looks promising. I hope you guys offer shorter uprights for some of us. 80”-84” would be nice.
@@raven-19x We'll work on this!
@@raven-19x You got it! We'll get to work on this : )
Thursday at NOON - Let's GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I loved the B roll of your spotter getting into position.
You should see the takes that didn't make it 😂
@@GlucksGym I have a feeling that TH-cam would demonetize you for that. Though based on some of the videos that pop up on TH-cam I'm not certain that's the case.
@@GlucksGym You don’t need to sell us on the out takes video. We already want it, so post it now. 100k views guaranteed
Came to this video late as I was looking for a power rack/functional trainer hybrid. I was wondering if you'd looked into the RX3 TORNADO RACK from Get RXd? It appears to be the regular RX3 power rack setup but with some new attachment cable arms so they sit out far further than the traditional ones. The original rack - out of stock by the way - system had duel cables so you could do 2:1 or 1:1 on a single stack which was nice in it's own way even if it looked weird, but I'm having trouble finding any reviews for either that aren't from the company. The RX3 series uses the standard hole size and spacing all the way up unlike the rack in this video as well. Wanting to see what others say before deciding if I go with them or another brand.
Thanks for doing this! I’ve been looking at this one for awhile because of the price point but have been hesitant because no one has done a review of it!
The committee for the glorification of glucks arms approves this message
😁😁😁 My favorite committee!
Thorough review!
That change in hole sizes is just odd...
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing.
The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
Great review. I bought a budget plate loaded version similar to this from walmart (I cant post links, but title is "Mikolo Power Cage, Squat Rack with Dual Pulley Cable Crossover System, Multifunction Free Weight Home Gym Workout Machine with Attachments"). I am waiting on box 2 of 2 to be delivered to be able to set it up and use it, but I would love to see you review it.
For your next review, they came out with a new version that is basically a regular 3x3 1in upright, but option to use 1:1 pulley ratio. It still seems better priced than athena and is more like the Dane from Fringe, but a 200lb stack with ability to use the whole stack is pretty sweet.
Yep. They took our feedback from this and designed that one. They are going to send one to us
The RX3 3000 cable towers and racks feature ability to do both 2:1 and 1:1 weight ratios! And we'll be releasing many more products in the RX3 ecosystem (1" hole 2" spacing, black e-coat hardware, chrome where powdercoat might scratch, etc) that are geared towards home gym owners!
@@GlucksGymI look forward to that review. With a 1:1, it seems like you could use one side as a full lat pulldown, low row. But, unlike the Dane, you get the lighter starting weight of a 2:1.
In your review, please give appropriate time to evaluating this functionality, and whether you can get a full stretch for pull downs.
I pre ordered the Ares when it first was announced and I absolutely love it. The 2.0 is going to be even better. Buy once cry once. Get the REP ARES or ATHENA.
Another great video. Very informative. Please consider reviewing the Get RXd Combo Rack. It looks very promising on paper. Thanx.
Basement Brandon has one I think he'll be reviewing. I'm not quite sure I have the space to start covering combos and it matches his training style much better than mine.
I've had their jumbo rack for about 5 months now and love it. I was wondering when you were going to review some get rxd.
Awesome, thank you!
As someone with a Get Rx'd squat rack, I can address the hole situation a bit. If you go their page you'll see that the racks are just part of a larger modular system for building things like ninja gyms. If you want to go full Lincoln logs it's awesome. When you want to add a third party attachment? Not so much. I love it because I got it locally, but it's definitely something to consider with their products.
Yes it's compatible within their own ecosystem as I showed in this vid but the standard sizes were set well before their system came out. It's a way to cut on costs some and if you start within their ecosystem it's great but it can get weird outside of it
Thanks for helping explain!
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing too and has the ability to do both 2:1 and 1:1 weight ratios! Come by the showroom if you'd like to see it in person!
Great review. The rack seems solid. Not a REP but it will save you some $$$. Keep the reviews coming!
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios!
The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup.
For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
Great review! I hope they change the hole spacing and switch to using 1” holes and hardware everywhere in the future. Adopting this feels like you end up locked in without a compelling reason. I do like how the storage shelves attach better than Rep’s with the Athena.
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios!
The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup.
For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
@@GetRxd the RX3 series looks phenomenal! I’m hoping Gluck gets to do a review before too long!
@@fwiffo42 We will be sending a FreeStanding Rack 3000 (uses our cable tower 3000s to build it) to Gluck for a review in the next couple weeks! We're also planning to release other unique rack configurations in our RX3 series in the next couple weeks as well - there'll be one with a smith machine and tornado pivot arms (like freemotion functional trainer arms)
@@GetRxdvery exciting stuff! I can’t wait to see the tornado arms!
Xebex has an updated magnetic sled 🙂
Yeah they keep asking if I want it for a review but it's hard keeping up with all these releases!
@@GlucksGym You know where to find us when you're ready!
The wife and I have a half rack in the garage and man I’d love to work in a lat pulldown cable stack. It’s a very important lift that I’m missing and pull ups are a bit out of my range still lol 😂
Thorough review my guy! Looks like a cost saving measure of not using true 1 inch hardware up top and bottom. Also, the trolley definitely needs to be a pop-pin system. Overall, for the price compared to REP, it does have some merit.
Yeah it surprised me some. I think if I weren't looking to expand off it (though that can be done in their ecosystem) the cost savings would be very tempting.
Starting to wonder if I'm the Get Rx'd shill here, but as an owner of one of their racks the holes are so it's compatible with their entire Builder system. People use it to build out stuff like ninja gyms. Rad for that, bummer when you try to add a Dialed Motion attachment...
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios! And yes, it uses a pop pin on the trolley too!
The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup.
For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
Just FYI, the whole wider functional trainer providing a better "stretch" on the pecs during a fly is actually a common misconception.
Tension is maximized on the pecs when the cables form a 90° angle with your hands (also applies to almost every cable exercise). Your pecs are also stretched only in the bottom/start position when you have the hands out wide, at the top they are contracted and at their most shortened when you bring your hands together (i.e. not stretched).
So... to actually maximize the stretch in a cable chest fly you'd want the cable positioned directly behind your hands to form a 90° angle with your body while in that bottom stretched position.
For most people this would be right around their wingspan during the fly, if not a little narrower since most should be able to slightly angle their arms behind their body to get a maximum stretch in the pecs.
A cable setup that is wider than your wingspan actually reduces the tension in the stretch on the pecs. The wider it gets, the more the peak tension moves towards the top squeeze position which is the opposite of a better "stretch" that most people talk about.
Thus, a functional trainer or all-in-one rack around 40" to 50" wide is actually pretty great for maximizing tension in the stretch position to actually get a stretch on the chest for most people unless you have an abnormally large or small wingspan during the fly!
Coincidentally, the latest research is actually also showing that prioritizing tension in a deep stretch position for most muscles is likely the best for muscle growth as well.
Yes glad someone is saying it!Biomechanics are good to know if you like fitness
Well put
I feel like I've made so many jokes and comments about fly width that I'm running out of ways to say it's not as important as some people make it out to be.
Also, you can (and should) always play with elbow angle to create the best tension for you. It's all about figuring out how YOU can use it best.
Great review! Thank you.
What is the actual distance in depth from the wall with the weight and storage shelves? The measurements in the video showed 31 inches, but not sure if that included the distance necessary for shelves, and for the weights on the outside horns? Thanks, it was a great video
I feel ya on the spotter arms but they do store very well on the uprights when not in use ans the car needs to pull in.
We now offer an RX3 spotter arm that inserts from the front, also has a nice rounded chrome pin to prevent any powder coat chips! Compatible with both our RX3 series and our Builder series!
This channel is awesome, should be getting more views. The rack is good but incompatibility with other brands is a deal breaker for me, every other manufacturer has always something better than the other and you need it to be compatible with your rack to make it future proof.
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios!
The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup.
For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
It seems odd that other import companies don't make their hole spacing match to the leading companies. I see a lot of people buying the discounted FT and adding premium attachments. Seems like a pretty cool option overall.
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios!
The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup.
For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
Looks like their RX-3 fixes some of these qwirks and has the option of 2:1 or 1:1 on the trolleys. Would be interested in a review if you can get one.
@@grantcampbell2974 yep. They watched and took notes (their words) and the RX seems to be their response.
We plan to send some of our RX3 configurations to Gluck for a review in the next few weeks! Thanks for noticing : )
I'm really looking forward to seeing this review.
I already Pre-ordered the RX3 tornado wall mounted version.
@@BANDANA___USMC Awesome! Shipping Mid November : )
I have an 8'x13' space, how would outfit that space? I don't know whether it would be better to have a RM-3 and a Torque Anker 7 or get a Rogue FM-HR Twin stack...? How annoying would adding/ removing J-Cups and Spotter Arms every time I wanna use the functional trainer?
Also, this does not seem to require front support footings, which is something that Rep recommends when getting the 4 post,. Your review indicated that the floor support arms were not necessary. The entire depth of the system is something that is important as my depth space is limited.
Depth depends on how you install the shelves (there's 2 positions for each) and which shelves you buy (they're not included).
Flat shelf goes back the furtherest at a maximum of 5.75". The plate coaster (one I have installed at floor level) is about the same with bumpers on it and it installed in the forward position like I have it.
Rack (4 post) without front feet is just under 36" deep. This does not include any shelves.
Front feet are another 22.5".
@@GlucksGym Thanks! Am I correct that the front feet were not on your video and do not seem to be required for stability?
@@kellyreyher3437 crap... I'm sorry I thought you were commenting on our Fringe Sport Dane Rack review which is similar to this. Those measurements are from that rack and completely useless to you. Unfortunately I don't have this rack anymore. I had to sell it to make space for the next one.
Please do a program, for getting so strong that you can levitate doing lat-pulls! :O
😂
At about 3:10: Which company made the rollers that Winnie was using?
That's Surplus Strength's. They're our favorite and I think code Gluck saves 5% on them.
@@GlucksGym Thanks.
Great review, I never would have noticed that issue with their spotter arms. Their website sucks though. It's not very clear on what the options actually are.
Their website definitely needs work
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios!
The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup.
For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
And, we're working on a new website!
Gluck did you ever use Rogue's Slinger system? They were one of the first with the concept but didn't quite nail it, and now are trying to play catch up
I have but I didn't like it
Hey, I'm just curious if you've ever given some thought to people who buy exceedingly cheap equipment.
For instance I myself have gotten purely ~1 inch (28mm, 29mm, 30mm, etc.) plates from a dozen companies and dirt cheap bars from companies like KSport and Gorilla Sports. Do you ever think about those in any, way, shape or form or have an opinion on them?
Asking since I'm in a more poor part of Europe and these do the job excellently well, given, I don't lift that much, but people have done greater things with less.
Just curious what your take on it is and if you will ever review something like this - it'd be interesting to go DIRT CHEAP on equipment and see how it fares for a while.
Do you find that lat pulldowns and low rows feel natural with the connecting bar? Dual pulley attachments on cheap equipment always feel imbalanced.
Where's the clothes rack attachment?
The compatibility issues would be the deal breaker for me. I want to be able to buy nearly any 3x3 1" attachment without worrying about whether it will work (besides a little expected slop when using Imperial 3x3 attachments on metric racks).
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios!
The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup.
For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
Hello! Nice video review! What attachment/device are you using at 0:11 to connect both the cables to do those lat pulldowns? I couldn't find that one on the website in the videos description!
That's the Longy bar from Darko Lifting. I added a link on the description because people always ask. Check it out here gluck.fit/DarkoLifting
@@GlucksGym thank you 😁
I am confused. You say it's not exactly in inches, because it is imported. But they only sell from the US and ship internationally from 5k upwards?
The steel tubing is imported. It's 75mmx75mm, but the advertise it as 3x3. Almost all companies import their tubing, with Rogue being a notable exception. As rogue uses American tubing, it is a true 3x3.
How does the feel in use compare with Rep? Reps are super smooth. I’ve tried them in the showroom.
They're comparable in smoothness. Rep is more polished with attachments and other things but the cables themselves are very similar.
Wall Mount Side rack Athena!!
I wonder why they went with smaller holes near the top. Strange.
I think probably just to keep costs down
Builder system. Check out the insane ninja gyms people make the the Get Rx'd stuff. Downside is that it made it impossible to use the Dialed Motion system
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios!
The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup.
For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
Nice review! Seems interesting.
What’s the attachment that allowed lat pull downs with both stacks?
Darko Longy bar gluck.fit/DarkoLifting
I can't tell, is the rack bolted to his wall or bolted to the ground?
No it's freestanding
@@GlucksGym any issues with it possibly toppling over?
Gluck, do you crowbar an innuendo in on purpose into each video or are they just Freudian slips 😅?
Is there a good reason to get this over Rep's?
The footprint is a little smaller because the storage doesn't stick off the back much like Rep's and it's cheaper but Rep's PR 5000 (or 4000) with dual Athenas is the nicer of the two.
Titan racks are 42" wide internally. Not 41"
Titan racks are 42” inside width
Correct. I meant to fix that in post but it slipped by me.
Can we get a review on that air compressor?😂
Did you see the old one I had a few years ago? Everyone loved that thing 😂
@@GlucksGymkidding aside…are you able to get that up to pressure on the shelf? Your walls must rattle something awful when that vibrates!
@@jjp2759 yeah it works fine. I only use it to inflate my kids stuff now. The old one was a 60 gallon I did a lot more with.
“I’d rather choose death than rearrange the rack” lol so many companies are focused on safety, I bet Get RXd went “D’oh!”
Not a fan of the odd hole spacing at the top. Like, why be cheap? Also those spotter arms. lol. If they can’t get the basics right, I’m not going to spend thousands on their rack. Pass for me.
I have their power rack and I find it frustrating because of this. The holes are also not spaced apart the same as Rogue and Rep Fitness racks, so not all attachments fit.
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios! And, the RX3 spotter arms now insert from front and rotate 90 degrees to lock in.
The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup.
For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
allergy season?
2.0 is gonna be sick.
2.0 is available now.
We now offer an updated RX3 FreeStanding Rack 3000 that utilizes 1" holes with 2" spacing, other design/quality updates, the ability to do both 2:1 and 1:1 weight ratios
The HRFTS-4000 is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup. For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
These all in one racks get too busy for my taste. I like to superset and with this you often have to disassemble everything to switch exercise. I am looking at a stand alone functional trainer to supplement my rack.
Nice shorts
❤
🥇
👑
The hole configuration is so strange! Otherwise interesting product.
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios!
The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup.
For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
Spend the extra $1k and get Rep. That is a no brainer. Buy once cry once. No way the quality and lack of accessory compatibility is worth the savings.
We do have a new RX3 series which features all 1" holes with 2" spacing. It also has a variety of other quality updates, and even has the ability to do both 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratios!
The HRFTS-4000 in this review is configured from a larger ecosystem of Builder pull-up rig components. The Builder series uses 1" holes in the lower area for j-cups and spotter arms, and then 1/2" holes in upper area for bolt-in attachments such as pull-up bars and crossbars. This "Builder" design is most cost-effective for gyms that are buying multiple pull-up bars and crossbars for a single pull-up rig setup.
For home gym owners, we'd suggest our RX3 series if you want the most versatile setup and ability to use accessories from other brands since the RX3 series uses 1" holes with 2" spacing throughout.
Bruh, hard to tell which hole?!
Winnie is such a GOOD WIFE!
Sir if you had flipped it you wouldve died goddamn
Hahaha yes. I started my tests a little gentler and went full TH-cam for the clip
third
and i’m on the subway
You did your best 😁