They all sing from the same hymn sheet because their wages mean more than their fellow man. I hope they put a bit by so they don't go into a home to be serviced by an immigrant.
The issue isn´t so much misinformation, but large media organisations promulgating very selective information. Purposefully not publishing all aspects of a scenario is far more dangerous than any random granny online posting a horrid and misinformed post
@jonescrusher1 considering my comment doesn't say it's not an issue, makes your reply to it a little odd. Media obfuscation is clearly a bigger issue than individual activities. You'd need a solid argument to the contrary to ever convince me it's the other way around...
Sorry, but no. Omitting aspects of the truth - however deceitfully done - is not in the same danger category as peddling hateful, violence-inciting lies.
@@babayaga00777 right, I couldn’t convince you otherwise because ‘media obfuscation’ is just another conspiracy theory, and conspiracy theorists can’t be convinced otherwise.
@alisoninchausti1080 You're conflating 2 separate things. An individual peddling anything subjectively deemed as hateful is incomparable to Mainstream Media with millions of viewers peddling in blatant obfuscation. If you actually think so, elaborate on why? MSM has lambasted much of the working class as "far right" < this is peddling hateful rhetoric. No?
I agree. Even if people disagree on many things, and come from various backgrounds, they should still fundamentally feel they are part of the same community. Having different communities spring up in a country is a recipe for conflict.
I thought two-tier policing existed as a concept on the left field of politics when it comes to how police treated black people in UK...no? So the police is okay now? Funny how you can admit two-tier policing can exist when one group brings light to it but not the other.
Yes, it's called white fragility. White UK people thought that the police would be on their side as they attacked and terrorised innocent POC because up until the equality laws were enacted, police would have been on the side of right wing racists attacking g black or Asians. They police don't do that anymore and are arrested and charged for it now, so the racists accuse the police of two their policing and what aboutism
You’ve made a public enemy of free speech The thing that’s supposed to protect the things you and I would rather not hear That’s the point. Saying “how bad it is” will not change that
If only it was all misinformation. In the Channel 4 universe, ordinary people have no experience of their own, no eyes, no ears and no children being attacked, abused and harassed.
@@garyreynolds5733 Oh you watch MSM and think we are drinking the cool aid....wtf normie doesn't know hes a normie and wants us to watch MSM with him.....hahahahaha just sayin haha
People didn't riot over a Andrew tate tweet! They did get pushed to braking point by governments, Media & Police gaslighting and two tier political idiogy....
I can't think of a time where so called "left wing misinformation" has resulted in racially targeted attacks, an attempt at arson on a hotel housing asylum seekers and overall violent thuggery on our streets, can you?
It's not about one case,it's the never ending crimes carried out by certain groups. Whre I live it's almost all white British and crime is so low the police station was closed and the just have an office. When I lived in London, Somalian youths broke into my house with knives, i'm talking about many crimes happening and not one was a white thug, always foreign. Same with friends and housemates
@@latrinemarine826Thanks for accepting the premise. Look on the label. Also, are you interested in all forms of water vehicle toilets or specifically, is it more about the abuse of the oceans with human faeces?
@@garyreynolds5733 Can you define for me what misinformation is and who gets to decide what misinformation is? I’ll let your question stew in your head for a bit.
@@Zenhumanist Because every single one of them is a left wing activist pretending to be an academic. You will never in your life see them use their platform to actually inform the audience on what the "far right" actually believe.
Musk said that there were 40% bot accounts when he took over. If he was dealing with that volume you would expect his follower count to have fallen by 40% or so. Strangely it has only increased
musk does not know what he is doing or how to manage a social media platform. It will continue to fail. People are leaving, advertisers are leaving. The so-called trump-musk interview that had technical problems is a hilarious example of musk's ineptitude.
Do we need to play V's monologe to London for Channel 4? The power to punish people for speech the government asserts to be untrue or dangerous is, given enough time, always used for the parochial interests of those currently holding power and against the public interest government accountability.
Constant focus on "the far right" whilst the British public as a majority has voted against mass-immigration for twenty years without and results from parliament.
Wrong. They thought they did with Brexit but lacked the cognitive faculties to understand that this would make it much worse. And when it did, many turned to violence. You got what you asked for
yeah, they turned it around so the problem is right wing thugs who hate immigrants because thy are racist. I Hate when people do that during arguments!
If a TV or radio station allowed 1% of what happens on social media, they would be sued into bankruptcy. Why does the legislation applied for broadcasters not apply for internet companies?
Because of a thing called the the electromagnetic spectrum It's finite. That's why radio and television is regulated by Ofcom because the frequencies are limited The government for example can't regulate a movie, in how it's made but if it's on a cinema then a rating will be made then uploading to netflix it isn't because it's a data center By definition nobody can own the same FM or AM signal or television station Websites or data centers are easy to setup by anyone Anyone can build their own netflix or Facebook or twitter That's why. The government can't control any of them. They can ban the sites but not order users to be removed
@@TheMagicJIZZ I don't think anyone cares about users. If a TV propagates fake news that results in damages or people hurt, it will have consequences because they have a huge reach. Internet companies have more reach and no responsibilities, I don't think it is fair.
If the news told the truth we would all be shocked a month ago the news like y'all couldn't stand Harris now she's mother Teresa gonna save America i😂🤣🤣😂the one she has spent the last three years destroying , y'all are the two face misinformation kings
Why should he be arrested? He apologised and even if he didn't, that misinformation was not inflammatory. If there were mobs of non-whites going around other towns and neighbourhoods looking for an excuse to attack whites, then I would agree it would be inflammatory.
Don't worry about mean speech and alternate views. Just be big boys and girls. Learn to be discriminating adults who think critically. You do not want to give government and social media companies the right to oppress and suppress the generations ahead.
I was misidentified as a convicted pedophile in 2017 on Facebook. This led to extensive media discussion in Ireland as to what legal obligations social media companies had and what regulatory powers could be applied to them. Needless to say it was a very grey area and there was not an adequate framework in place either in Ireland or in Europe to compel these companies to accept and fulfill their reasonably understood obligations.
@@SA-ff9uc No, direct legal action against Facebook wouldn't have succeeded, as the legal obligations for SM companies are not like the print media. I went on 2 radio programmes and a national TV news programme and cleared my name. 6 weeks later the same thing happened to another guy in another part of Ireland.
That's just awful. Bit like the thugs that attacked a paediatrician, unable to read and write well enough to know that wasn't the same as a paedophile,a few years ago. So wrong. Same people, same lack of logic and disregard for reality.
Australian here. Boycott travel to UK. Many Aussies stand in solidarity with British citizens stand against a tyrannical government. We just found out it was a Aussie mother and daughter stabbed...its become very personal now. The free world cannot accept this!
Are you saying that Australia doesn't have mentally ill, homeless drug users? That you don't get disturbed people occasionally attacking people at random??
Indeed, four years on we know full well HM Government misled us about Covid being a "killer disease" and that the lockdowns were insane and pointless, and were just a precursor for the attacks on our civil liberties that have been enacted since.
Yeah that's been my experience with toktok. Event blatant discrimintation and hate speech reports are ignored. It's always "no violations found". They don't care about the type of engagement as long as there is traffic in the app.
Terrible to see misinformation dominate online in such a way - intelligence, accuracy and integrity are essential to keeping people safe and a well-functioning society. It is fine to question, but tot spread nonsense, and even worse, for people to believe it, is very concerning.
The efficiency of misinformation is a sign of a failing education system. If people are taught how to discern likely untruths or recognise implausible statements and analyse what they hear and read, misinformation, propaganda and social media targeting would not be so dangerous.
annerigby, no doubt that poor education and the ability to think critically plays a part in mis/disinformation and outright lies. That said their are clear signs that a great deal of "opinions" that are regularly voiced on Social Media platforms are being written by individuals who are there simply to antagonise and start off arguments, insults, slurs against those who can think for themselves. Comments sections that have no connection to the subject matter turn into arguments for the sake of it. The art of healthy debate has long vanished !
@@geofo60 The fact that someone can wiggle their fingers on a keyboard and send insults, etc without seeing the person who receives it, makes it very easy. It is up to the sane people to decide to not participate, not fall into these mindless discussions. "Ignore them, they'll go away" seems true, to me anyway, in this case.
Channel 4 has a significant role in misinformation, misframing of an underlying issue they refuse to discuss. The issue is around group identity and agreement of values Cr has never been interested in anything else than ideological agenda.
The fact this video exists is hilarious. When the most popular video on your channel is the Jordan Peterson interview, where you falsely accuse him of 'misinformation' multiple times and get embarrassed for it. How can we believe anything you say when you are literally a mouth piece for the government?
When twitter blocked and banned free speech: "its a private company, they have the right to do it" When Musk's x allows free speech: "we need regulation!" Hillarious 😂😂😂
Why they still happen on all platforms x is definitely the worst because he sacked all this stuff that we're trying to stem the flow we need to start giving these platforms really heavy fines this is the only thing that will stop it, It's all about money it always will be.
PS. A few years back it was a certain Kier Starma who himself alleged that the police and justice system were “two tier” so I hope he’s ready for his punishment as a “far right” extremist?😅
@@RoniBliss Credit where it's due, Channel 4 has produced some brilliant journalism inside Palestine over the past few years (like the West Bank land grab documentary). They're the best of an evil bunch in my opinion.
Indeed, the last time I got banned by Twitter/X was under Elon Musk, and that was for merely asking someone who claimed to be a "liberal" on their profile how they could support the Ukrainian Nazis and claim to be a "liberal". This time I decided not to open another account.
This is why personal wealth should be capped. Money is power, so what happens when one of the most powerful men in the world loses his mind and has control over global infrastructures?
According to facts...For example, a Muslim asylum seeker didn't kill the girls in Southport. Or do you still think that story spread by all the usual suspects was true, including EU citizen Tommy Robinson.
@@zivkovicable should one take as fact a report on state media regarding the arms industry if the arms industry funds political parties? Should one take as fact a report on the commercial media regarding the pharmaceutical industry if they're the largest sponsor of commercial media?
@@mrrmut57 One should look at all information critically . Why would I trust random posts on X anymore than so called mainstream media? As far as I can see, Musk, the richest man on the planet is as mainstream is you can get.
@@zivkovicable Agreed, one should look at all the 'available' information critically. However, what we are witnessing here is the foundation being layed for legislation effectively controlling what the public one can and can not say, or see through electronic media. This will give the government to the ability to prosecute those who question or contradict the state narrative, effectively extinguishing public debate and criminalising decent. This is a dangerous trajectory and one that leads to dictatorship.
@zivkovicable Agreed, one should look at all the 'available' information critically. However, what we are witnessing here is the foundation being layed for legislation effectively controlling what the public one can and can not say, or see through electronic media. This will give the government the ability to prosecute those who question or contradict the state narrative, effectively extinguishing public debate and criminalising decent. This is a dangerous trajectory and one that leads to dictatorship.
Yeah I stuck it out for a while as I liked it before Musk took over, but it's become an increasingly poor experience. So many bot accounts, way worse than it was before, for you content being prioritised over those you follow, which is usually just divisive bullshit, analytics have gone unless you pay, hiding likes, promoted posts within replies - the list goes on... My one hope is that Musk gets distracted by his next shiny thing at some point and sells it but at this point I'm convinced he's just going to drag the platform to it's death.
That is far less and at least somewhat regulated, musk and trump want zero accountability which is nothing but terrible for everyone other than themselves.
All social media should now be removed from protections under section 230 of the US communications decency act. They are clearly publishers not platforms. They should be subject to the same editorial standards and sanctions as any other publisher.
@@AtheistfanGuavaNo, but you can make the platform provider responsible for the information published on said platform. And, as with the UK, other regions need to begin to proactively pursue users who promote unlawful content through the courts. But the starting point is to make the platforms, and Executives, accountable. That will only come through EU/region-wide regulation with regulatory powers extending to the prohibition of platforms which will not comply with regional legislation.
@@Andy-rc9db you are not making sense at all. Free speech/freedom of expression is Unlawful content ? There are 300 million plus users who state their opinion on X, and you want the platform be responsible for opinions of the individuals ? So first ammendment should be thrown into the 🗑 ? Obviously the freedom of expression is not good according to you, Maybe China is a very fan of you or you a fan of China style government ?
@@AtheistfanGuava That response makes little sense and does not engage with the point that I made. Did you just copy and paste it? Or is two paragraphs of text beyond you?
As will always be the case. Why does one set of people get to decide what's disinformation and what's factual? Maybe people should put in a counter argument to disprove the disinformation? That would be WAY more effective
Only if that counter argument is made and given exactly the same promotion as the questioned information. If Elon Musk names your son as a p*do to 185 million followers, good luck with changing the narrative by arguing that he isn't to your local WhatsApp group
That only works if the counter-argument is published next to the original information and given equal weight. If Tommy Robinson names your son as a p*do good luck convincing all his thousands of followers that he isn't' through your Family WhatsApp group
@@wilhelm4321 Gravity is a "fact", physicists debate it all the time. Fact does not equal truth, although it may point to it, and truth is what is important. That is why we need conversation, not censorship. This whole video does nothing but promote censorship.
The solution is simple: Teach people HOW to think, rather than TELL them WHAT to think. And yet, that never seems to be considered. It’s always about silencing and punishing dissent. I wonder why…
Why don't you interview someone who claims to be a victim of Two Tier Policing? The woman arrested in Leeds for... well for something they had to think up over night while keeping her in a cell, for instance...
Thank God for The Legend Donald Trump and Elon Musk . Why wont Camala do any interviews ever ? She is dumb but surely she needs to face the journalists some time.
They interviewed a "far right expert" and the former head of the would-be Truth Department of the United States. Who are you to cast aspersions, eh? These people are EXPERTS!
![สั่งทอง.. จาก temu ของจริงป่ะ? ( part : 1/2 ) [โกงไหมครับ ep.94 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2tYS1qTMB78/mqdefault.jpg)
![เปิดใจ “ต้นหอม ศกุนตลา” หลังโดนพาดพิงธุรกิจที่เคยทำ และผลกระทบทำถูกปลดฟ้าผ่า! | แฉ 24 ต.ค.67 [2/3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vCi5OIqlxaE/mqdefault.jpg)
The disdain Channel 4 has for citizens of this country really is astounding. The people who work at Channel 4 should be ashamed. Putrid.
Indeed.
They all sing from the same hymn sheet because their wages mean more than their fellow man. I hope they put a bit by so they don't go into a home to be serviced by an immigrant.
Ok, Vlad
@@bambina5604 Keep up the name-calling, because it's worked so well so far.
@@davey1602 oh, you've had many people calling you russian names? Interesting.
I know there is also misinformation on channel 4.
Yet here are. Perhaps you should stick to the Daily Fail.
@@martinpatterson3417 Daily Fail is on the same side, churning out government propaganda
Do you? Do you know that? You must be an inverstigative reporter with evidence then. Spill the beans, Mr. Big.
@GaryRenolds Your marxist tantrum, can smell the abuse, alchool and rage from here.
@MartinFatersin Your rhetoric failed as usual, all your ilk have.
The issue isn´t so much misinformation, but large media organisations promulgating very selective information. Purposefully not publishing all aspects of a scenario is far more dangerous than any random granny online posting a horrid and misinformed post
No, the problem of misinformation as described here is an issue.
@jonescrusher1 considering my comment doesn't say it's not an issue, makes your reply to it a little odd. Media obfuscation is clearly a bigger issue than individual activities. You'd need a solid argument to the contrary to ever convince me it's the other way around...
Sorry, but no. Omitting aspects of the truth - however deceitfully done - is not in the same danger category as peddling hateful, violence-inciting lies.
@@babayaga00777 right, I couldn’t convince you otherwise because ‘media obfuscation’ is just another conspiracy theory, and conspiracy theorists can’t be convinced otherwise.
@alisoninchausti1080 You're conflating 2 separate things. An individual peddling anything subjectively deemed as hateful is incomparable to Mainstream Media with millions of viewers peddling in blatant obfuscation. If you actually think so, elaborate on why? MSM has lambasted much of the working class as "far right" < this is peddling hateful rhetoric. No?
"the impact it has on communities" there shouldn't be different communities, there should be one community in a country. Orwellian doublespeak
I agree. Even if people disagree on many things, and come from various backgrounds, they should still fundamentally feel they are part of the same community. Having different communities spring up in a country is a recipe for conflict.
They love this word.....
Well, "should" is one thing, reality another. Most people have nothing in common with rioters, for example.
@patrikfloding7985 indeed, very few indigenous community members have anything in common with Pakistanis.
I thought two-tier policing existed as a concept on the left field of politics when it comes to how police treated black people in UK...no? So the police is okay now? Funny how you can admit two-tier policing can exist when one group brings light to it but not the other.
Yes, it's called white fragility. White UK people thought that the police would be on their side as they attacked and terrorised innocent POC because up until the equality laws were enacted, police would have been on the side of right wing racists attacking g black or Asians. They police don't do that anymore and are arrested and charged for it now, so the racists accuse the police of two their policing and what aboutism
It probably helps that the first case has actual statistical evidence supporting it, whilst the second is just gammons wanting to feel persecuted.
@@TheOldGuest I believe thats what the other camp feels when it happens to the other.
@@TheOldGuestI have seen the two tier policing first hand.
@@suffocated Except the first case has actual statistical evidence supporting it, whilst the second is just gammons wanting to feel persecuted.
You’ve made a public enemy of free speech
The thing that’s supposed to protect the things you and I would rather not hear
That’s the point. Saying “how bad it is” will not change that
You're mixing up hate speech with free speech.
If only it was all misinformation. In the Channel 4 universe, ordinary people have no experience of their own, no eyes, no ears and no children being attacked, abused and harassed.
Stand up the far right, conspiracist apologist.
Quite so.
How come a news Media organization like Channel 4 is not supporting free speech? What has happened to the journalists of today? 😢
What are you on about?
How about letting the citizens decide what constitutes reliable information and not the PR arm of a privately controlled media company?
MSM channels like Channel 4 should start speaking the TRUTH.
Or you can stop drinking the conspiracy cool aid from the grifter class. Just sayin'.
@@garyreynolds5733 Oh you watch MSM and think we are drinking the cool aid....wtf normie doesn't know hes a normie and wants us to watch MSM with him.....hahahahaha just sayin haha
@@garyreynolds5733 What's your fav normie? BBC, CNN, here channel 4. Cool aid......hahaha
@@obid7755 I'm not really sure you actually said anything.
@@obid7755guffaw guffaw flabbergaster wa hah ha ha. Have I come down to your level now?
channel 4 complaining about misinformation... don't think we've forgot what you done back in June
What did they do?
@@justadude1443 misinform
People didn't riot over a Andrew tate tweet! They did get pushed to braking point by governments, Media & Police gaslighting and two tier political idiogy....
I disagree with this piece, I think more efforts should be made to fight the disinformation within and on the mainstream media.
lol
Indeed, the gaslighting and disinformation coming from the Left is very noticeable.
Definitely. They are frightened of Musk because free speech is an enemy to their agenda.
C4 talking about 'misinformation' HAHAHAHAHA! funniest thing i've ever heard
Why ? What are you talking about ?
I'd rather have loose talk and idle speculation on X, than orchestrated lying on Channel 4.
D*n*ing-K*ug*r, much?
You mean combating right-wing misinformation, I guess? For left-wing misinformation is, of course, always OK...
right wing misinformation has caused riots and deaths of innocent people, yet to see a left wing commentator have the same level of negative impact x
I can't think of a time where so called "left wing misinformation" has resulted in racially targeted attacks, an attempt at arson on a hotel housing asylum seekers and overall violent thuggery on our streets, can you?
There are no far right groups in the UK i challenge channel 4 news to name a single one that is in operation today in 2024.
@@stuie999 reform UK
What "far left" misinformation has caused people to go out and try and burn down a hotel?
It's not about one case,it's the never ending crimes carried out by certain groups. Whre I live it's almost all white British and crime is so low the police station was closed and the just have an office. When I lived in London, Somalian youths broke into my house with knives, i'm talking about many crimes happening and not one was a white thug, always foreign. Same with friends and housemates
wow can I move in nearby?
Censorship also impacts society
not as much as disinformation
@@denisdaly1708 how so?
More propaganda from the UK’s version of the Korean Central News Agency.
Or you can stop drinking the conspiracy cool aid from the grifter class. Just sayin'.
@@garyreynolds5733 and what conspiracy theory am I drinking? Please do share.
@@latrinemarine826Thanks for accepting the premise. Look on the label. Also, are you interested in all forms of water vehicle toilets or specifically, is it more about the abuse of the oceans with human faeces?
@@garyreynolds5733 Can you define for me what misinformation is and who gets to decide what misinformation is? I’ll let your question stew in your head for a bit.
Gary, take a break, get some sleep or have a kitkat. You’re chatting breeze every time I stumble upon your comment.
People who identify as "experts on the far right" calling other people grifters is quite comical.
and like wise on the far left
@@rufanuf1 Yeah maybe. I've never heard of one though or seen them get platformed.
How?
@@Zenhumanist Because every single one of them is a left wing activist pretending to be an academic.
You will never in your life see them use their platform to actually inform the audience on what the "far right" actually believe.
They called him an 'expert' but he just spouted dog whistle sound bites about Tommy Robinson, etc. which showed he's completely ignorant.
Musk said that there were 40% bot accounts when he took over. If he was dealing with that volume you would expect his follower count to have fallen by 40% or so. Strangely it has only increased
It's way worse now.
@@mrharry448 TH-cam has bot accounts. The left are mostly in control of big tech so they are the ones making the bots
musk does not know what he is doing or how to manage a social media platform. It will continue to fail. People are leaving, advertisers are leaving. The so-called trump-musk interview that had technical problems is a hilarious example of musk's ineptitude.
Or twitter has become more conservative and Elon's popularity with conservatives has increased since buying x
@@mrharry448 TH-cam is filled with bots
Do we need to play V's monologe to London for Channel 4? The power to punish people for speech the government asserts to be untrue or dangerous is, given enough time, always used for the parochial interests of those currently holding power and against the public interest government accountability.
Constant focus on "the far right" whilst the British public as a majority has voted against mass-immigration for twenty years without and results from parliament.
Wrong. They thought they did with Brexit but lacked the cognitive faculties to understand that this would make it much worse. And when it did, many turned to violence. You got what you asked for
yeah, they turned it around so the problem is right wing thugs who hate immigrants because thy are racist. I Hate when people do that during arguments!
What abt misinfo and propaganda on Channel 4 and other MSM ?
If a TV or radio station allowed 1% of what happens on social media, they would be sued into bankruptcy. Why does the legislation applied for broadcasters not apply for internet companies?
@@gnhonho Who can afford to sue him?
Because of a thing called the the electromagnetic spectrum
It's finite. That's why radio and television is regulated by Ofcom because the frequencies are limited
The government for example can't regulate a movie, in how it's made but if it's on a cinema then a rating will be made then uploading to netflix it isn't because it's a data center
By definition nobody can own the same FM or AM signal or television station
Websites or data centers are easy to setup by anyone
Anyone can build their own netflix or Facebook or twitter
That's why. The government can't control any of them. They can ban the sites but not order users to be removed
@@TheMagicJIZZ I don't think anyone cares about users. If a TV propagates fake news that results in damages or people hurt, it will have consequences because they have a huge reach. Internet companies have more reach and no responsibilities, I don't think it is fair.
If the news told the truth we would all be shocked a month ago the news like y'all couldn't stand Harris now she's mother Teresa gonna save America i😂🤣🤣😂the one she has spent the last three years destroying , y'all are the two face misinformation kings
What? have you been listening to the news the past 6-7 years.
Russia trump hoax,
Israel bombing hospital they didn't,
etc.. etc..
Have there been any arrest warrants for people like nick Lowell’s ( hope not hate ) for his miss information about “ the far right” acid attacks ?
Why should he be arrested? He apologised and even if he didn't, that misinformation was not inflammatory. If there were mobs of non-whites going around other towns and neighbourhoods looking for an excuse to attack whites, then I would agree it would be inflammatory.
What can be done to combat rising misinformation on Channel 4 News?
For thugs like you there is always GB News
You can cry a bit...? Will that help?
What specific misinformation are you talking about ?
@@garyreynolds5733 You seem to be crying all over the comments 🤣
@@TeslaNick2 they take hamas' word as truth...
I find it ironic that Channel 4 is asking about what can be done about misinformation.
Don't worry about mean speech and alternate views. Just be big boys and girls. Learn to be discriminating adults who think critically. You do not want to give government and social media companies the right to oppress and suppress the generations ahead.
X is a free place where you can speak about anything. Not like the rest of apps.
I was misidentified as a convicted pedophile in 2017 on Facebook. This led to extensive media discussion in Ireland as to what legal obligations social media companies had and what regulatory powers could be applied to them. Needless to say it was a very grey area and there was not an adequate framework in place either in Ireland or in Europe to compel these companies to accept and fulfill their reasonably understood obligations.
Couldn't you sue Zuckerburg? Terrible thing to happen to somebody. Potentially life-ruining.
@@SA-ff9uc No, direct legal action against Facebook wouldn't have succeeded, as the legal obligations for SM companies are not like the print media. I went on 2 radio programmes and a national TV news programme and cleared my name. 6 weeks later the same thing happened to another guy in another part of Ireland.
That's really bad especially since there are a lot of unhinged people out there who believe any 💩 on social media!
@@SA-ff9uc Mate...
That's just awful. Bit like the thugs that attacked a paediatrician, unable to read and write well enough to know that wasn't the same as a paedophile,a few years ago. So wrong. Same people, same lack of logic and disregard for reality.
Channel 4 talking about misinformation 😂
Australian here. Boycott travel to UK. Many Aussies stand in solidarity with British citizens stand against a tyrannical government. We just found out it was a Aussie mother and daughter stabbed...its become very personal now. The free world cannot accept this!
Are you saying that Australia doesn't have mentally ill, homeless drug users? That you don't get disturbed people occasionally attacking people at random??
@@LuciThomasHardylover-qx6tsYes he is saying that appeaser
@@Stephen-lx9nm who's appeasing what? Maybe try and make sense?
Maybe try and make sense?@@LuciThomasHardylover-qx6ts
How dare we have free speech, we need to stop thinking for ourselves
Jail anyone who hurts our feelings, silence everyone who doesn't think what they tell us. Channel 4 never lies!
Hurt your feelings? THey are ORGANIZING POGROMS against Muslims people of color and immigrants. That is a CRIME.
You sound like someone who's had their feelings hurt.
1. avoid all news channels.
2. dont be dumb.
I solved it.
Let's talk about covid misinformation
Indeed, four years on we know full well HM Government misled us about Covid being a "killer disease" and that the lockdowns were insane and pointless, and were just a precursor for the attacks on our civil liberties that have been enacted since.
That’s what I’m saying too
Misinformation is different when they do it
@tempnamee there is no misinformation there is only opinion one side is is free thought the other is Jewish money
Wow - conspiracy to anti-sematism in two posts. Nice people.
What Covid misinformation are you specifically referring to ?
"communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities communities" - people who 1984 was written about
Turn the UK into North Korea. 😂
Behave.
No
Try and even visit North Korea and then understand how dumb you sound.
Our free speech trumps your feelings, 10 times out of 10.
It's not just "X" it's on platforms like TH-cam, which, when you report they take no action.
Guess what? You can report the comments yourself when you see them.
Very true, but they can control it if it suits them
Yeah that's been my experience with toktok. Event blatant discrimintation and hate speech reports are ignored. It's always "no violations found". They don't care about the type of engagement as long as there is traffic in the app.
@@marketads1That's literally what they just said
Good!
Don't you think the universe is trying to give you a sign?
Mis-information. This platform is exactly that. Ffs🥋
D*n*ing-K*ug*r, much?
My guess is you are a Zionists 😅
Can't believe this is a British news channel more like an anti British channel
Imagine living in a aociety run by Guardian readers, BBC and Channel 4 viewers, and labour voters.
They'd sell out their family for social points.
Better then selling them out for grifters.
nothing you state is factual. you are another crank spouting nonsense
Whilst they all drive teslas and virtue signal 😂
@@zigowl1193 Incoherent reply.
So move. I hear Rwanda is nice
what can be done to combat misinformation on channel four news?
Terrible to see misinformation dominate online in such a way - intelligence, accuracy and integrity are essential to keeping people safe and a well-functioning society. It is fine to question, but tot spread nonsense, and even worse, for people to believe it, is very concerning.
The efficiency of misinformation is a sign of a failing education system. If people are taught how to discern likely untruths or recognise implausible statements and analyse what they hear and read, misinformation, propaganda and social media targeting would not be so dangerous.
annerigby,
no doubt that poor education and the ability to think critically plays a part in mis/disinformation and outright lies. That said their are clear signs that a great deal of "opinions" that are regularly voiced on Social Media platforms are being written by individuals who are there simply to antagonise and start off arguments, insults, slurs against those who can think for themselves. Comments sections that have no connection to the subject matter turn into arguments for the sake of it. The art of healthy debate has long vanished !
horrible , expecting people to use their brains and think for themselves!
@@geofo60 The fact that someone can wiggle their fingers on a keyboard and send insults, etc without seeing the person who receives it, makes it very easy. It is up to the sane people to decide to not participate, not fall into these mindless discussions. "Ignore them, they'll go away" seems true, to me anyway, in this case.
Too late for you lot to having a well functioning society.....
Enjoy living in a communist society
Channel 4 are the champions of misinformation.
If they're wasn't an underlying issue with people's concerns being unheard, these people wouldn't have the huge numbers of followers . 🤔
elephants in the room will be censored. I agree, what's more...now we're.....ohf the police just broke down my door.....
Wow, channel 4 telling us about the dangers of misinformation, that's a bit rich is t it?
what can be done to combat misinformation on channel 4?
Once a bot - always a bot.
"Far right expert", no hes just a Guardian journalist LOL
CHANNEL 4 NEWS SHOP LYING 🤥 WE SEE THROUGH YOUR PROPAGANDA
Do you? Do you? Do you, really?
@@garyreynolds5733hard not to.
Who is we you pleb?
@garyreynolds5733 yes. Now wipe the tears from you face Gary and try it yourself.
@@AmonAnon-vw3hr try what? You need to introduce a verb for a command. I apologise if English is not your first language.
his Xcellency the Lord of X
Interesting that Channel 4 still actively uses it's own 'X' account.
Tell me you completely missed the entire point of this video without saying 'I completely missed the entire point of this video'
They put out more misinformation (or let’s be honest pure lies) than most
I still use a knife to cut beef steak!
You say it is interesting and yet clearly it is not. Curious.
How?
George Orwell perhaps meant "2024" not 1984 ...
Lowkey has a fantastic video on the Zinst funding of this so called Tommy Robinson on DDN Channel
Love Double Down News
Thanks for the heads up.
Great episode
I'm no friend of Israel but Lowkey is top of the deportation list.
@@wavell14 Oh, so you're picky about which boots you lick? Well done.
Channel 4 has a significant role in misinformation, misframing of an underlying issue they refuse to discuss. The issue is around group identity and agreement of values Cr has never been interested in anything else than ideological agenda.
Misinformation on X?! What about misinformation and fake news on channel 4. I used to trust channel 4 before the reform uk actor thing.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha - oh that lie thing. that thing? D*n*ing-K*ug*r, much?
channel 4 misinfo
The fact this video exists is hilarious. When the most popular video on your channel is the Jordan Peterson interview, where you falsely accuse him of 'misinformation' multiple times and get embarrassed for it.
How can we believe anything you say when you are literally a mouth piece for the government?
How about the government tackles tenuous issues like immigration and bias news reporting rather than going after people voice their opinions
When twitter blocked and banned free speech: "its a private company, they have the right to do it"
When Musk's x allows free speech: "we need regulation!"
Hillarious 😂😂😂
Channel 4 putting a piece out about freedom of speech?😂 you lot are clowns
Invented non words like ISLAMAPHOBIA AND FAR RIGHT
ADDRESS THE CAUSE NOT THE REACTION
Lame Channel 4. Time to call it a day.
Ok Captain Gammon, try not to hurl a brick at a mosque today yeah.
Lame bot
We need our own great firewall.
Why they still happen on all platforms x is definitely the worst because he sacked all this stuff that we're trying to stem the flow we need to start giving these platforms really heavy fines this is the only thing that will stop it, It's all about money it always will be.
But you probably would drive a Tesla 😂
@@grahamgriffiths7405fuck no.
PS. A few years back it was a certain Kier Starma who himself alleged that the police and justice system were “two tier” so I hope he’s ready for his punishment as a “far right” extremist?😅
what about the misinformation on Channle 4 news? Safe and effective vaccines...
The safety and efficacy of vaccines is now a matter of historical fact. What are you talking about ?
@@TeslaNick2 Wrong. Still no long term testing.
@@llh3025 What are you talking about ? Covid was four years ago. History proves you wrong.
@@TeslaNick2 like, natural immunity hey?
@@siralexbateman People who have natural immunity have little to no reaction to the virus or the vaxxine. So what ?
Someone needs to look in the mirror.
Pot and kettle C4
I'm more concerned about all the misinformation on the BBC tbh...
There's no misinformation on the BBC. You've just been tricked into believing things that aren't true.
AND channel 4!!
@@RoniBliss Credit where it's due, Channel 4 has produced some brilliant journalism inside Palestine over the past few years (like the West Bank land grab documentary). They're the best of an evil bunch in my opinion.
There is more 'misinformation' on Channel 4 than X !!!!
He is NOT a free speech absolutist. He suspends everyone who criticises him. He’s a dangerous joke.
And a stupid one at that.
Stop lying.
Indeed, the last time I got banned by Twitter/X was under Elon Musk, and that was for merely asking someone who claimed to be a "liberal" on their profile how they could support the Ukrainian Nazis and claim to be a "liberal". This time I decided not to open another account.
This is misinformation, Elon Musk does not suspend accounts that criticise him.
@@Nika_Scott dude, just do a web search
What can be done to combat rising misinformation on channel4
…says Channel 4, comedy gold.
Nina jancowitz? Are you serious channel 4?
Where parody begins? The line keeps moving.
This is why personal wealth should be capped. Money is power, so what happens when one of the most powerful men in the world loses his mind and has control over global infrastructures?
You could just block and ignore him
@@tomwright9904 And that matters how when he’s in charge of military intelligence satellites?
Misinformation...according to who?
According to facts...For example, a Muslim asylum seeker didn't kill the girls in Southport. Or do you still think that story spread by all the usual suspects was true, including EU citizen Tommy Robinson.
@@zivkovicable should one take as fact a report on state media regarding the arms industry if the arms industry funds political parties? Should one take as fact a report on the commercial media regarding the pharmaceutical industry if they're the largest sponsor of commercial media?
@@mrrmut57 One should look at all information critically . Why would I trust random posts on X anymore than so called mainstream media? As far as I can see, Musk, the richest man on the planet is as mainstream is you can get.
@@zivkovicable Agreed, one should look at all the 'available' information critically. However, what we are witnessing here is the foundation being layed for legislation effectively controlling what the public one can and can not say, or see through electronic media. This will give the government to the ability to prosecute those who question or contradict the state narrative, effectively extinguishing public debate and criminalising decent. This is a dangerous trajectory and one that leads to dictatorship.
@zivkovicable Agreed, one should look at all the 'available' information critically. However, what we are witnessing here is the foundation being layed for legislation effectively controlling what the public one can and can not say, or see through electronic media. This will give the government the ability to prosecute those who question or contradict the state narrative, effectively extinguishing public debate and criminalising decent. This is a dangerous trajectory and one that leads to dictatorship.
I've left twitter / X when Musk took over and I advise everyone to do the same.
thank you for you advise. Do you have a link to your blog?
@@stephen_ne8406 🤣
@@nikhilnewse3318 you need to visit mental doctor soon otherwise you will suffer😂😂😂
Yeah I stuck it out for a while as I liked it before Musk took over, but it's become an increasingly poor experience. So many bot accounts, way worse than it was before, for you content being prioritised over those you follow, which is usually just divisive bullshit, analytics have gone unless you pay, hiding likes, promoted posts within replies - the list goes on...
My one hope is that Musk gets distracted by his next shiny thing at some point and sells it but at this point I'm convinced he's just going to drag the platform to it's death.
The "free speech extremist" banned me for exercising my free speech. I don't miss that s---hole. It died when he took over.
what can be done about misinformation by the corperate media?
That is far less and at least somewhat regulated, musk and trump want zero accountability which is nothing but terrible for everyone other than themselves.
All social media should now be removed from protections under section 230 of the US communications decency act. They are clearly publishers not platforms. They should be subject to the same editorial standards and sanctions as any other publisher.
@@peterrees6346 Amen.
Wow! Channel 4 your misinformation is so informing. Perhaps you should look at your own misinformation before projecting it onto others.....
Make social media platforms publishers, like we do with newspapers and TV/radio news...
You can't make 300 million users opinions as publishers, can you ?
@@AtheistfanGuavaNo, but you can make the platform provider responsible for the information published on said platform. And, as with the UK, other regions need to begin to proactively pursue users who promote unlawful content through the courts.
But the starting point is to make the platforms, and Executives, accountable. That will only come through EU/region-wide regulation with regulatory powers extending to the prohibition of platforms which will not comply with regional legislation.
@@Andy-rc9db you are not making sense at all.
Free speech/freedom of expression is Unlawful content ?
There are 300 million plus users who state their opinion on X, and you want the platform be responsible for opinions of the individuals ?
So first ammendment should be thrown into the 🗑 ?
Obviously the freedom of expression is not good according to you, Maybe China is a very fan of you or you a fan of China style government ?
@@Andy-rc9db no wonder Elon bought twitter, because of people like you.
@@AtheistfanGuava That response makes little sense and does not engage with the point that I made.
Did you just copy and paste it? Or is two paragraphs of text beyond you?
10:25 “power of first amendment free speech rights” ahhh that tickled all my American senses lol
As will always be the case. Why does one set of people get to decide what's disinformation and what's factual? Maybe people should put in a counter argument to disprove the disinformation? That would be WAY more effective
Only if that counter argument is made and given exactly the same promotion as the questioned information.
If Elon Musk names your son as a p*do to 185 million followers, good luck with changing the narrative by arguing that he isn't to your local WhatsApp group
Facts aren't debatable they are backed up by evidence and data. There is no other side or different opinion regarding facts.
That only works if the counter-argument is published next to the original information and given equal weight. If Tommy Robinson names your son as a p*do good luck convincing all his thousands of followers that he isn't' through your Family WhatsApp group
@@wilhelm4321 Gravity is a "fact", physicists debate it all the time. Fact does not equal truth, although it may point to it, and truth is what is important. That is why we need conversation, not censorship. This whole video does nothing but promote censorship.
@@prettyfast-original Conversation equals legitimacy. Unfortunately censorship is the only option when dealing with misinformation
Channel 4 News - Definitely no misinfo coming out of this channel.... NOT!!!
What can be done to counter misinformation on Channel 4 News?
Switch it off and go back to sleep?
As someone who can see both sides have a point , I can safely say we are fucked
Like when channel 4 reported 500 dead at the hospital in Palestine which turned out to be false?
And GB news and talk tv tells the truth right and pigs can fly
Source?
@@t-you2003 channel 4 al ahli, first post in google
@@fear-the-most-High where did i mention those? 🤡
Do you not think 40,000 (mostly kids and women) have died in Gaza from Netanyahu's ideologically driven genocide-crusade?
The solution is simple:
Teach people HOW to think, rather than TELL them WHAT to think.
And yet, that never seems to be considered. It’s always about silencing and punishing dissent.
I wonder why…
All preachers of hate, inciting hate and violence like Tiny Tommy should be charged under the anti terror legislation.
He's never did that though? I've seen muslim councillors' insight violence, though. Didn't he get arrested and charged?
@@Thichaou You have just butchered the English language.
@@Gone2war-q3i nothing you state is factual. you are in a cult of hate and lies and projection.
@@KustomGear1
You mean the Englandicklesstan?
@@KustomGear1
You mean Englishitstan?😂
Why don't you interview someone who claims to be a victim of Two Tier Policing? The woman arrested in Leeds for... well for something they had to think up over night while keeping her in a cell, for instance...
Thank God for The Legend Donald Trump and Elon Musk .
Why wont Camala do any interviews ever ? She is dumb but surely she needs to face the journalists some time.
What can be done to combat riding misinformation by Channel 4 News?
What misinformation is that?
Bat Bot, Bat Bot, Bat - Bother someone else, bot.
Defunding and cancelling Channel 4 would be good start.
Where does this need for censorship come from? Does the UK government have their own botnet now?
What can be done to combat rising misinformation on Channel 4, the BBC, and from the UK government?
Go live in Russia?
Maybe channel 4 can stop misrepresenting people and being such sneaky weasels. That'd help reduce misinformation
Channel 4......the bastion of truth.
🤣
😂😂
very truthful on this subject. the far-right is a cult of hate and lies and misinformation
Comedy hahaha
They interviewed a "far right expert" and the former head of the would-be Truth Department of the United States. Who are you to cast aspersions, eh? These people are EXPERTS!
You could shut down all newspapers and television news, that would not only solve all the misinformation on X but news as a whole.