Hi, i would like to understand from you, as this cursor makes app really easy and fast, even for no code guy, what do you think will be the part of the engineers/ developers when the ai can actually code full robust app E2E just by words i type there?
There is one concept on your paper that is important but I don't really understand. This is because I come from dbase/foxpro programming in the 80's / early 90's. "Use functional programming patterns in JavaScript; avoid using classes unless absolutely necessary." It would be good if you could have a short video explaining this for those of us who are not real programmers.
I like how you asked. I will start like this: You have programmers and non-programmers. As a programmer, you know that every project is different, and every approach is different. What you expect when you hire a JD or even an SD to handle different tasks is always going to vary. As a non-programmer, you’re likely going to want the most important thing to stand out depending on what stage you’re at. At these early stages, certain explanations will be needed, and others won’t. Every application you work on is going to be different, and because it’s such a powerful tool, getting in-depth with the instructions about exactly what you’re doing puts the tools on steroids. The instructions here are somewhat vague. They don’t cover the significance of the tool’s capabilities, and they’re also very limited in contrast to why the instruction section is really there. It’s there because the tool is powerful and should be personalized depending on where you’re at. At the very least, I’d say show people a prompt for ChatGPT or Claude (whichever you prefer). In that prompt, talk about what you want to build, what developmental stages you’re at, and what instructions would be best to achieve your goals. Now we’re talking about good advice leading to good instructions for Cursor. You don’t have to agree with me, but these are subpar (shitty) rules/instructions considering, just as I stated in the OP.
Great job many thx for this 🎉🎉
Hi, i would like to understand from you, as this cursor makes app really easy and fast, even for no code guy, what do you think will be the part of the engineers/ developers when the ai can actually code full robust app E2E just by words i type there?
There is one concept on your paper that is important but I don't really understand. This is because I come from dbase/foxpro programming in the 80's / early 90's. "Use functional programming patterns in JavaScript; avoid using classes unless absolutely necessary." It would be good if you could have a short video explaining this for those of us who are not real programmers.
Oh wait a second. I have at least 5 different ai sites open in my browser. I can just ask them.
Can you do one for Java ?? This is amazing
Fuck yeah man! keep going! 🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️🚀💃
Hey, I'm going to learn, come on
Those are shitty rules btw
No, they're decent. Your comment is worthless though. btw
@@SeerWS OK bud cause u said so
You're a Troll... until you say why. 👾
I like how you asked.
I will start like this: You have programmers and non-programmers.
As a programmer, you know that every project is different, and every approach is different. What you expect when you hire a JD or even an SD to handle different tasks is always going to vary.
As a non-programmer, you’re likely going to want the most important thing to stand out depending on what stage you’re at. At these early stages, certain explanations will be needed, and others won’t.
Every application you work on is going to be different, and because it’s such a powerful tool, getting in-depth with the instructions about exactly what you’re doing puts the tools on steroids.
The instructions here are somewhat vague. They don’t cover the significance of the tool’s capabilities, and they’re also very limited in contrast to why the instruction section is really there. It’s there because the tool is powerful and should be personalized depending on where you’re at.
At the very least, I’d say show people a prompt for ChatGPT or Claude (whichever you prefer). In that prompt, talk about what you want to build, what developmental stages you’re at, and what instructions would be best to achieve your goals. Now we’re talking about good advice leading to good instructions for Cursor.
You don’t have to agree with me, but these are subpar (shitty) rules/instructions considering, just as I stated in the OP.