Exploring Dead Games That Were Supposed To "Kill" Battlefield
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.พ. 2025
- For over two decades, Battlefield has been the king of large-scale multiplayer warfare. Over the years countless games have risen, promising to dethrone Battlefield, claiming they could do it better. But in the end, they all stumbled.
Thanks to @jackfrags for some of the gameplay clips.
__________
Follow me on social media:
▶ X - www.x.com/thec...
▶ Discord - / discord
#Battlefield #fpsgames #exploringdeadgames
I cannot forget how WW3 generated hype as a Battlefield killer and then faded into obscurity... TWICE!
I still play it and it still has a dedicated fan base with some new players. I have about 1400hours in that game and I love it. Since BF went down the hill this is the only game that managed to scratch the itch. They have a new development team as the IP and game was sold to a new studio. I always find games during the peak hours even if there are just 300 people playing it.
Their was that third try that went no were but to make it harder to play by removing it from steam and trying to appeal to an eastern audience
Yeah man both devs teams really fumbled the game it could have been a great game but they just didnt know what to do with it.
The game was awesome but the audio design was horrible, and the performance issues@@timomaanen
@@roshawn1111 I didnt have any performance issues but yeah the sound desing was shit and the servers were horrible too but if you got on a good server the game was fun af.
I said it once. I'll say it again. The only thing that can kill a franchise is the franchise itself.
What a special little unicorn you are, with statements like that. Did you come up with that all by yourself?
@@NonZenze😂😂😂😂
Oddly enough, this isn't completely true when you remember how COD was literally the reason why Medal of Honor died off and Battlefield is on the struggle bus and in crisis mode, and was never competitive in terms of playercount.
@NonZenze come on man, no need to be condescending.
As an old geezer, my peak Battlefields were: BFBC2, BF3 and BF4.
Battlefield 2
Based
Same. I liked 3 battlefield games. They've released like 7 of them. Once a franchise releases more games I dislike than the ones I like, I no longer consider myself a fan.
Well the game truly was terrible :)
Bad company 2 is still king
WW3 honestly should never have had such a short TTK or manual leaning.
It’s the battlebit issue-all of these battlefield competitors frontload their games with super accurate weapons, fast TTK and other combat systems borrowed from mil sim games and then get surprised that nobody can stay alive long enough for a combat flow to form.
The BF killer to generic Milsim pipeline should really be studied
If anything BF becoming casual is what made it take off with BF3. BF1 is the last great game and it was super casual that few players even touched BFV since.
Totally agree. TTK has just gotten shorter and shorter over the years. It's just a question of who sees who first now and there's no time to react. And what makes it worse is most games also have a pretty bad mismatch between TTK and TTD. Look at Delta Force.
Ya people sometimes have a mental breakdown if you suggest spreed or suppression, it honestly something that you need in large scale shooter if you don’t want to adopt actual elements that milsim do to do the same
I often see that games that go into photorealistic milsim die as soon as they get released or do not provide any significant interest
I just wonder if these studios are blind to see patterns or they are just oblivious to notice their mistakes
Short TTK with big areas and lack of contrast between the player and environment is just basically a recipe for a disaster. Adding to that going for photorealism is just a barrier for most people who are not using the newest hardware (which is overpriced crap anyway), considering that games from 10 years ago can run on potatoes from current perspective
It’s so funny when people say we have short TTKs in games. When’s the last time you went back and played or looked at any fps from the 2000s? You die quickly in all of them if you weren’t basically a soldier with a regenerating shield.
Timestamps:
0:35 World War 3
2:15 CROWZ Squad Operator
3:47 Combat Champions
5:39 Battle Bit Remastered
7:43 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare
@Apipoulai thank you Sir!
Plenty of "Battlefield Killers" have marched forth, and all have fallen. The only thing that can kill Battlefield is Battlefield (and EA). Unfortunately, this is something that Battlefield and EA has become quite adept at.
OLD? how old - Im 71 and still playing
Planetside 2 was the only LSMPW game that was able to lure me away it was a lot of fun but the graphics are pretty laughable especially by today's standards. I don't know how many play it now but back in the day I was in battles with over 800 players which was really awesome.
Danm forgot about Planetside 2. I feel like that game is what Battlefield pretends to be, actual large scale battles that go on for a long time, so you can actually maneuver to try to find better ways of attacking etc.
Battlefield should try including proxy chat. Maybe radio systems for vehicle players to communicate too
Proximity chat would be so cool. Even if it's just for the fun like it was in BattleBit. But you're right about the vehicle communication that would definitely help.
Older battlefield games are the biggest competition for a new battlefield release. Still plenty of people who never moved away from whichever of 3, 4, 1 or V they preferred. I stuck with 4 until V came out. Bought 1 and 2042 obviously but less than 100 hours in each. Shit happens, they aren't all going to work for everyone. Fingers crossed the next one is good. If not, definitely giving '83 a shot. Rising Storm 2 was always on my radar but never had anyone to play with, I'll give those devs a chance.
I would *STILL* be playing BF4 if it weren't for the *very last* patch they implemented before dropping support.
The patch that increased spread or (Spread Increase Per Second aka SIPS). They made every single attachment increase your SIPS which made attachments like the angled grip useless because the increase in SIPS from the attachment completely nullified any accuracy you would have gotten from equipping it.
BF3 and BF4 were fantastic. You could kill at long range with ARs but only by tap firing - which made the ttk take longer because otherwise the recoil doesn't allow you to land shots. If you're close you didn't have to tapfire. If you moved from cover to cover, tapfire could wear you down but not instantly beam you.
Now from 2042 I came into BF1 and BF5 but damn how boring they are... I can play Redacted for years, but dozens of those maps can't give me that drive. I understand why ppl love them, but now I'm afraid that dice are really going to return to BF roots with BF6...
@@provalivay I think you're in the minority..
All games that are built on idea that it will kill something more popular will only kill itself.
World war 3, battlebit, delta force and so many more, are very good examples.
Battlebit was amazing and would still be flying high if the developer didn't just drop the game and ran away with the money.
@@XTrooperL All of the games I listen have massive potential, but devs just gave up on it.
Ww3 is still alive now(Kind of) as it's quite easy to get matches when I play.
A perfect battle field game would have a map editor. This is really the failing of most modern AAA games - they completely shut out community generated content. It's just fill the battle pass, play the same maps, buy the skins, then repeat on the next title. There is no chance for players to create what they want to play and teach the devs what they're looking for. They sort of leaned that direction in BF6 with the custom games and nods they made. But how empty of character the base game was in front of it almost made it seem like they were saying "we don't know what you want, show us what it is so we can put it in BF7." Even the reveal trailer was basically, "Haha, look at all the fun times we've had in the past - come recreate them here!" instead of "Here is our identity," and then in later promotions make nods to the community over the years. There is a reason that titles far older than the current AAA titles sport players in the 10s of thousands.
More fragile vehicles would help a lot as well. People constantly talk about the magic of Bad Company 2 and how even EA didn't understand what made it so great. The careful craftsmanship focusing on infantry combat, with a combined arms accent, on absolutely amazing maps, is what really sold it.
Only thing that is keeping Halo Infinite alive atm is it's community and Forge. I believe a map editor even in a mild form would still be a great addition to BF. So many times I just wanted to be able to adjust the capture zones for conquest or Rush and see how that played.
ww3 is the biggest flop in fps genre in the last 5 years. Such wasted potential. The hype for this one was huge.
Every time I tried it, it ran like dogshit and what’s more remarkable is that my rig could handle 2042, yes, 2042 at preview and release ran better than World War 3.
Battlefield 4 ran like butter.
@@alexdasliebe5391 BF4 is undefeated 🐐
Another you could add to the list is Homefront from 2011. It was very innovative for the time and a lot of fun but ultimately fell prey to hacking and security issues.
I agree. Homefront was, for sure, ruined by hackers.
I am surprised that it didn't make the list. It was an interesting premise that just didn't pan out. With some of their concepts making it to 2042. Like being able to purchase vehicles with points in game. Though you could only do it when spawning in. The vehicles were also very dumbed down for controls similar to 2042.
@@TheoriginalBMT They had a little bird, a 50cal ground drone, high value target concept, a front lines concept where you advanced or fell back to new portions of maps and the first 3rd person melee. I'm sure I'm missing things but it was very innovative as I said.
2042 is presently my favorite Battlefield game ever.
Tbh If they weren’t so focused on being “Battlefield killers” and stayed in their own lane they would probably do well. We don’t need 100 different types of Battlefield
I’m not gonna be pre ordering this time around, But I am looking forward to the next battlefield. I really have high expectations for this game, they can’t possibly mess it up this time. Especially with David being in charge and understanding the frustration that we all have.
They added battle royale mode in this upcoming battlefield 💩🤡
@@chasethechosenone8478 sadly David is one man… they are adding a F2P Battle Royale AND they are cranking up the love service model to 11… it’s basically gonna be gameplay wise better than 2042, but worse in terms of content, skins, battlepass and so on and so forth
@ well battlefield isn’t really known for colorful skins that’s more of a cod kind of thing I think if they just keep it gritty and realistic with the skins I’ll be happy with that. And we don’t know that fersure rumor is there will be 10 maps at launch and around 45-50 weapons.
@ i mean don’t get me wrong coming off all negative, i sincerely do HOPE that they make a real Battlefield game, personally i think they will completely flop… but fingers crossed 🤞
@@tottistenstrom815the new Battlefield is super cool. really cool gameplay. it is already better than the previous Battlefield games
Where are the man children that said that Battlebit was better than 2042 ? I remember when the game came out, everyone was over hyping it, saying it was better than Battlefield and whatnot, now where are these people? The game barely has 1000 concurrent players, it's completely dead... The developers grabbed that sweet sweet attention grabbing crash and dipped, nothing new but it's entirely our fault. We're the ones who made the game a success to prove a point to EA and DICE in the first place. not because the game was good by itself. I said before multiple times, we only played that crap because we had a Battlefield itch that nothing else could scratch. Nothing can kill Battlefield other than Battlefield itself.
Ignoring the fact battlefield 2042 feels absolutely horseshit with all infantry weapons feeling like air soft guns with no recoil or feedback, or that battle bit far outperformed it in terms of destruction and vehicle to AT-infantry balance which made playing as a tank hunter actually rewarding and interesting and made not instalocking vehicles whenever available and instead choosing to play infantry actually fun and viable, not to mention the much wider array of weapons which battlefield lacked. there hasn't been proper battle rifles in a battlefield game since hardline but in battlebit take your pick, the FAL was my favourite gun in the entire game, the recoil was monstrous but if you could control it you were rewarded with the fastest TTK in the game. Yea the scar H is in 2042 but in battlebit they actually feel like a separate weapon class and not just a slightly higher damage lower rof assault rifle with no noticeable recoil or sound or just general punch difference. unless your a vehicle whore or someone who likes playing with lazerbeams or airsoft instead of guns with actual feedback which imo makes them 20x more fun to use bf2042 is a straight downgrade
Ofc that's ignoring all the fantastic building options, the ability to drag bodies and much more in depth healing/revival and armour/armour customization mechanics, and ofcourse the drastically more in depth weapon customization which let you build super specific weapons too your liking, while still managing to keep most guns pretty comfortably viable and not feel all the same bc of the fantastic sound design and again recoil function.
if your claiming its crap and 2042 is better your either tweaking, like playing boring slop, cant control recoil, or meatride graphics as important for gameplay experience and wont except anything less than attempted photorealism
@@___autumn__ You're the one ignoring the fact that you're on ultimate copium mode. It had nothing special about it, all it had was features and quality of life gameplay mechanics that were missing in 2042 but were present in previous Battlefield titles that made Battlefield feel like Battlefield. Everyone at the time the game released was itching to have that Battlefield itch scratched off and so the game had massive initial success. It was never a game that was meant to retain its playerbase or take itself seriously , it was just a fabrication directed towards the Battlefield playerbase. People were so obsessed and biased with trying to make a point to EA and DICE, they were being hypocrites and contradicting themselves especially since both games shared similar flaws, but Battlebit was never supposed to even be comparable to Battlefield because it threw in milsim mechanics into the mix. It was all blind hype. Now the game's dead and abandoned because people moved on, even the developers. Period. You can deny it all you want but it's just the plain truth that people don't want to admit.
They’re hopping on Arma Reforger and Delta Force and will do the same for games to come
@@___autumn__ Bwaaa lmao you are defending a roblox clone, Buddy.
@CC45-As Yep, me and buddies have moved onto Delta Force since it's actually got working mouse input. I know only a few friends into milsim so they're on Arma 3 or Reforger but I'm way more of an arcade shooter person.
Combat Champions seems more like a competitor for The Finals which is what happens if you take Mirror's Edge free running and mix it with Battlefield gunplay and destruction
The finals does not at all have bf gun play or destruction.
Battlebit has the best hit reg out of any shooter ive played. So crispy 👌
My dream is that EA announces that DICE will still support bfV and add the eastern front in the future :'l
BFV got so much undeserved hate
@@ReconEMIR It didn't get enough hate.
@hipperguy1654 exactly. Refunded that shite multiple times. It was such a nuisance and I do not remember what it was last time but something basic was implemented in a annoying way. Apart from the cluttered UI, it could've been the revive mechanic. Something was odd with the weapon sway. That movement was a bit obnoxious for the gameplay I guess. Unsure. Either way wouldn't buy it even at the current sale of 2 bucks, just nah.
I loved Joint Ops Typhoon Rising on PC back in 2004. 150 player servers, different classes with weapons that were class specific and a few that were universal amongst classes (like BF4), load outs with weight that would affect speed, different ammo types, the choice of flak vests, the ability to choose quantity of ammo, adjustable zero for long range rifles, tons of explosives and launchers...... So, so, much to offer. Then came the expansion packs and DLC. It's literally the only game that would motivate me to go back to pc gaming if devs ever thought of bringing it back.
I agree, most recent battefield games bf4 and onwards are generally great but struggle in categories like map quality or balancing
at this point its only a matter of time when a game is released that will take the #1 spot from battlefield. insane that there hasnt been a real battlefield killer when looking at how bad the battlefield games have been for the last 5 years
Delta force going strong 👀
What i find boring about BF 2042 are the maps. If only the maps were in more iconic locations like WW3.
Completely agree. Played tons of BFV and 2042 and a few others but have come back to BF1 and I’m having the most fun I’ve had in fps games since, well, since I quit playing BF1.
I think the BF games might experience the same thing some titles like Diablo 2 do. A lot of players remember the "good old days" and long for the feeling they had back then. And some of those good old games are still fine, but they don't exactly hold up to modern gaming standards in a lot of ways. So I think there's a sweet spot of delivering that old school feeling and keeping a game's identity while making the game feel modern and polished at the same time, which is really hard to nail, though.
They still can't copy that Battlefield formula right to this day. Even Delta Force itself is a cheap copy of Battlefield 2042, which itself is a copy of Black Ops 4 with giant maps. Huge shame that nobody can deliver a decent entry to this day. Good video, informative and helped shed some light on other games that tried to grab the formula.
the real battlefield murderer was the franchise itself
The issue is that games today are just overhyped way too fast by their communities and developers actively push the battlefield/cod/cs killer narrative.
All these genre defining titles saw a gradual increase in popularity which gave the devs time to collect feedback and find their niche.
If a game recieves too much attention in a short period of time people will just burn themselves out within a matter of weeks.
The only game i could see giving battlefield a run for its money in the next decade would be Arma 4 if they support their modding community.
This series already has a loyal playerbase which would prevent it from fading into obscurity after the initial hype and its mechanics are so far above everything else that it wouldnt just be another clone that acts as a placeholder for the next BF game
You had me in the beginning, but then you mixed up two genres - both are great games that have, and will continue to co-exist - I don't see any of them going anywhere, especially not because of each other.
@@NonZenze Im not talking about Arma replacing BF.
What i meant to say was that if Arma 4 keeps up the great mod support of recent years it would have the best chance of releasing a product that could co exist with a good BF game throughout its entire lifecycle without it going through the same hype cycle that ruined recent BF like games.
In essence what i imagine is a game that starts its life similar to DayZ back in the arma 2 days (a community made mod where the mechanics are adjusted to cater towards a different type of playerbase which eventually gets its own standalone game)
This would be a very slow process but it would allow the game to create a solid core playerbase while also establishing a slow burning hype
I had the most fun with Battlebit Remastered in this list. I got 300 hours of play before I grew tired of it. Paid for the Founders Pack after about 100 hours since I had already gotten my money's worth from the base edition. For comparison I got tired of DF around 100 hours and uninstalled but did buy the Season pass thing to support the game as it was fun initially before it got way too sweaty.
If Battlebit updates I'll definitely hop back on!
What’s really amazing is that if you’ve played the close quarters DLC for Battlefield 3 (which was one of the best DLCs in the franchise history), Battlefield has been able to do COD style gameplay, but better than COD.
But when COD tries to do Battlefield, they can’t even come close to the level that Battlefield does.
Battlefield is simply the best, and even their bad releases are better than most of their competitors.
Absolutely nailed it!
That especially becomes clear when COD tries to do WW2, what an utter failure that has been. The heydays of COD 1 & 2 will sadly never come again, partially because COD can't do 'realistic' anymore, and
they just can't do vehicles, at all.
Meanwhile, DICE have perfected land, sea and air in all shapes.
The biggest problem is all of these companies trying to make a battlefield like game and just catering to PC which is a complete mistake that's why Delta Force is about to go the same way straight in the gutter
I moved on from Battlefield to Arma Reforger, the game is blowing up right now, the player base has tripled since December.
Ground War failed because they made the vehicles too op.
Also, the chokepoints were fun but cod players always throw a fit whenever there aren't 17 entrances into every room that allows them a guaranteed flank because they only enjoy shooting at people who aren't shooting back.
All of which just goes to prove how difficult it is to make a Battlefield game. Balance, gun play and map design. Optimisation on PC must be a nightmare with all the different specs of PC. Maybe cut DICE a bit of slack?
And the battle passes, weapon skins, player model skins, vehicle skins, bundles, elite/ultimate editions and many other live service crap ... that's the most difficult part to implement. Guys, please cut dice some slack. They're really working hard!
Absolutely. All of the armchair commentary from people that think they know anything about game development is exceedingly tiresome. It's not like the developer has a big "OPTIMIZE GAME" button they can press with every update; it's a lot of work and it can be very difficult. If it were easy, every game would release in a nearly-flawless state.
yeah sure ill just give them $60 for another broken launch and 2 maps at most next time
@@canman87 Sure but why did they use worldwide gamers to optimize the games and make maps better instead of hiring play-testers like before?
Look at BF2042 at launch and now. The improvements is obviously noticeable but visually, BF1 & BF5 still look better.
@@Smart-ch9ed if you think it will cost 60 dollars, you are sadly mistaken. And did you read the whole comment, or just the last sentence?
Ground War is a gem. Should have never been abondoned. It was almost perfect. it was "what if we do combined arms. but cod style". and it worked. it really did. it was large scale mayhem cod style.
Battlebit being abandoned all of a sudden is the real reason it (mostly!!!) died. It being full of sweats is actually not unlike BF itself, since it doesn't rely as heavily on SBMM and instead of more traditional severs.
MoH 2010 also had a BF-like MP developed separately by Dice.
Where did you get the BF theme music at the end of this video? So cool
It's this one here: th-cam.com/video/MbC5mUU_z8s/w-d-xo.html
8:33 Can't trust your own shadow on that map
Combat Champions actually looks really good. It just needs better branding and identity!
Very simple BF4 2.0 launching with stable servers and minimal bugs. They dont need to innovate much. They have lots of bf games to pick what works and what doesnt. And by the way i really enjoyed mw2019 ground war, it wasnt bf but it was smooth and fun
Competition wasn’t needed, Battlefield killed itself.
I hope the next battlefield game is good and not the mess 2042 was on launch
Other games don't kill Battlefield. Battlefield kills itself.
I really liked WW3 in it's beta state. I payed 15 € towards the development started to regret my decision really soon. Only god aspect is, that I "only" payed 15 €.
Battlebit was initially designed to be a Milsim game! Also the sweat clan 'issue' wasn't actually a problem, it didn't happen nearly as much as people say it did.
oh man, MW2019 ground war was the only thing I played since I didn't own a BF game on PC at the time.
I remember when Battlebit got released. I was hoping it would come to PS5 but then it died. I enjoyed watching on Twitch but never got the chance to play.
Battle Bit looks interesting! Is it still on?
Yes it's also still the most played on this list. You can find it on Steam. :)
It still has a playerbase but if it ever gets a much needed update again remains to be seen.
many people proclaim that delta force is the next but you forget one detail, Tencent does know how to keep a game alive (see cod mobile) and also they are bringing new skins and content every now and then, but yet we still have to see how DF will be in 1-2 years at the moment is doing right
and i'm not a fan of DF i don't even play it anymore after 22 hours of playtime
As a WW3 player, the game has a lot of potential and can be popular. The only problem right now is optimization and glitches.
Are they even still fixing it? Last time I heard about some update dropping but that was like years ago or so.
It was bought by a new studio and they just dropped an update last week.
Delta force will be added to this list within a year and a half from now.
There's just too many games - BF3, BF4, B1, BF5, BF2042 along with all the BF competitors. 10 years ago there were just 2-3 games and there was real progress between each of them.
Thanks again, very informative video ❤
Turns out Battlefield was the battlefield killer.
Other than gameplay, classes system, maps, weapons and vehicles, the history and human tragedy of WW1 is what's keeping BF1 going after all these years.
Planetside 2? It has been delivering for 13 years already, but now it is dying due to the lack of content and outdated engine. The game has hooked me for an year or more by the real Battlefield feeling and unique rules.
bf3 with its map Metro was perfect for people that like chaos. Delta force is a perfect replacement for that now
Good list ima go play some of them 👍
I commend Battlebit since it was made by 3 guys, they did a great job with what they had.
I think we are mostly in agreement: 1)completed and polished game
2) invest in quality of life (servers, anti cheat etc)
3) communication with the devs if or when things go wrong. Warthunder puts special hearts next to patch notes fixed thru player reports for example, things like that go a long way for some players.
Basically just learn from past mistakes.🤷 Lol
Forgetting Shatterline lol
Thanks for bringing it up. Had completely forgotten about this one.
Shatterline had nothing to do with Battlefield tho. It was CoD with a payload and a PvE rogulelike mode.
@@XTrooperL It had similar classes and destruction part made by devs who made Battlefield 2.
Ironically, only battlefield can kill battlefield
Wow, so deep ... But actually just a dumb statement that people who wish to see Dice fail says. Battlefield is not going anywhere. It has no competitors, never actually had.
WW3 was a great game, still is. Just launched in a oof state, at the wrong time, and because of them building it in UDK and basically being 100% photogrammetry, new maps just never made it. Kinda sucks.
WW3 was great until they reset everyones stuff, after that i walked away
Its too bad Battlefield simply forgets its origins, BF42 was revolutionary versus the crap we have now. They could just upgrade the graphics and terrain and it would be Game of the Year
yo what is the song playing in the background?? Love it!
There's several. Do you have a timestamp?
@TheCadWoman yeah, at 0:06, right at the start!
It's epic yet calm at the same time!
I really don’t think anyone could do what dice can, even at battlefields worst. Look at delta force, joke vehicle physics, no transport air, lacks the sandbox gameplay etc etc
So are Hell Let Lose and Delta Force the best BF alternatives?
At the moment I'd say yes.
Where is Polygon? 👀
Completely forgot about that. Thanks for bringing it up. :)
I just now realized polish and Polish 🇵🇱 are spelled the same
Yep. xD
Battlefield 4 lyfe!
What about Hell let loose and squad?
They're not exactly dead.
Delta Force is still it, I play it daily
Only Battlefield can kill Battlefield
No wonder they force Battlefield and Call of duty to compete. Even though both are completely different.
Ground war was rough because no destruction and map designs. But even without ground war. Some people still force the competition.
only battlefield can kill battlefield
Great idea! There still is nothing like BF.
Battlefield killed itself without help
What about Delta Force?
idk why battlebits devs didnt get the obv flaw of the TERRIBLE audio design / weapon sounds
Gutted that some of these games never made it to console would have loved to try ww3 or Battlebit remastered on Xbox and still no sign of delta force on console will just have to stick to BF4 for now 😢
Forgot Delta Force
Isonzo will rule them all. But yeah, no vehicles
Isonzo is really good. Still enjoy it.
Hey Cad: You know there are dozens of YTers' who are doing so-called reviews on BF 2042. In this video you mention the 2042 "crisis". Being most of the other YTer's are very unclear about anything. In a nutshell how would you describe the "crisis"?
The '2042 crisis' is whiny kids and Dice giving in to them, which is why your YT'ers won't be clear about it. 128 players came with compromises in level details, and that gave the haters something to cling on to. It was an experiment, but people wasn't ready to give it a chance.
More around early 2022, when the player count of 2042 dropped massively and players were so disappointed with the game, its state and content.
@@TheCadWomanHey Cad: Well, IMHO it think people are far too critical of the hard work of others who actually write the code and put it all together. I don't have a problem with the game's state or content. I mean what exactly is the issue with the content or state? What other FPS games do you know of that have a rules editor that allows you to write your own code? I would bet the players who condemn the game don't even know about the rules editor. I don't see those YT critics writing their own code and creating their own game structure. I enjoy playing the game but when I'm done I'm not thinking "boy this is a really crappy game". Everybody wants to be THE expert while they tell us about all the games failures. And I'm not new to this, I've played since its inception. And I've seen all the incarnations and the bugs. So what. It is what it is. And I don't rely on a silly game to support myself. It's just a freaking game. Ok peace out Cad
Battlefield did that itself
You didn't mention Ravenfield :( (it doesn't have multiplayer but still)
unpopular opinion, this game will blow up, mark my words!!! this game is better then battlefield in many ways, delta force sucks dick, its a polished game that has a very real feel to it, nothing i have felt before iam 1000 hours into the game and it still delivers
Ok but what game lmao
@golgothic99 WW3
I disagree about ground war it was loads of players playing day one and throughout that whole year of mw2019 it was a success that’s why they brought it back in MW2 but sadly it got pushed out because of Warzone , DMZ & Zombies
Go ahead and disagree, doesn't make it right. You having fun and liking it doesn't make it a Battlefield killer, which is what the video is about. One question: did it have jets? There's your answer. Beside that, even the land vehicles were clunky.
@ I never said it was the battlefield killer tho learn how to read and comprehend I said I disagree that it wasn’t successful which it was. I’ll admit I’m more of a cod player my first battlefield was hardline I play both games cod is the better game overall and with that being said both bo6 & 2042 are trash games I’m only excited abt battlefield new battle royale mode that’s coming that’s all I care about same with warzone
Roblox has some battlefield killers
The next dead game: Delta Force. A/D is a mix of normal "CQ" and close combat maps, they need to separate it from each other. King of the hill makes no sense on pipe-style maps like Shafted, Knife's Edge, etc. - they need to separate it... SMG45 is still king and a lot of other weapons need to be buffed to get viable or the SMG45 needs a nerf. Like a lot of SMGs would need more drop off, to be more realistic and to make it a need for medics, recons etc. to choose an AR on more open maps... Etc.etc.
I'm only playing Delta Force, because there isn't anything out there, that fits my "needs". Delta Force will not kill Battlefield. It lacks of enough maps, it lacks of options for players to change sides, squads, etc. - an option for players to favour attacker or defender side, to make matchmaking not sucking because you have to play three rounds of defender on the same map (I had it being defender on Knife's Edge three times in a row, and if you quit, you get merit points taken off... not very motivating, but understandable). Shorttest round I had was 9 minutes on Trainwreck as a defender, my team did not nothing, I was the best player on the server still but got merit points taken off - THAT is not motviating to come back...)
In addition I stopped playing BF2042, one reason to be they changed the conquest flags to be closer to each other because people complained about "the need to run to far and then getting killed"... Man, it is BF... After the changes for the cry babies it felt to Team DM like making no sense to drive to another flag to get it for your team, because you just need to defend or attack one and the same all the time to get on top of the scoreboard...
No need to kill battlefeild when they killed themselves 😂
Player base is a fickle group
Nothing really like battlefield on consoles either
I'm still holding out hope Battlebit is still being worked on and will make a comeback, even if just for a few months.
Battlefield dethroned itself
WW3 was as disappointing as 2042s launch
I still think battlebit was far superior to battlefield, I would still be playing it daily if it weren't for the fact that the lowest ping servers you can get in Australia that are active start at 200 ping which inst very playable if you have less than 200 ms TTK, yes its a skill issue but either way its not fun.
You thinking that doesn't make it right, and what you said has nothing to do with a skill issue, so wrong again.
Battlefield killed itself :D