@@ragemage3049 yes to hypnotize your children into becoming trans cause that how it works if you show people anything outside of "normal" it will corrupt their brain
As far as I'm concerned, Toy Story 4 doesn't exist. It does enough things to retcon the past that it's like it doesn't even exist in the same universe.
☝☝☝ THAT'S WHAT IT FEELS LIKE, and NONE OF US need to go through it! The ironic bit is that they try to make their stories more "inclusive" and in the process have only included themselves--as opposed to the timeless stories they used to tell which included everybody.
I want to tell them that I go to the movies for MY therapy sessions and I'm not looking for a political lecture. To those who think that going to the movies for therapy is stupid, well at least it's better than boze and drugs.
I don't know how many people have seen Jeremy Jahns review of it, but he gave it a "Buy on Blu-ray" rating. I'm still not going to see it, because I've just had enough of Disney's crap.
If it's good watch it you'll reward good and disey keeps making good so incredibles 2 inside out 2 zotopia 2 are going to be the only disey movies I really have hope for being good at least on the level of the firsts but not as good seeing the reviews that's how it be disey makes a original movie with a slightly worse but still great sequel shrek and shrek 2 anyone toy story 1 and toy story 2 is how people are describing inside out 2 it's the toy story 2 to insides out toy story so in short so zootopia 2 will be like shrek 2 were some people say it's Beter than the first since some talented pepole are still at Disney working at Pixar and disey for inc4exibles 3 zotopia 2 and evtuly since this movie is doing well it'll be Pixar's toy story can't wait for inside out 4
Incredibles 3 I memt incredibles 2 was a example of how they Make a slightly worse first version or they go the shrek 2 route and some people say it's better than the first but since this one actually has a psude villain in axinty consisting how she acts she's more a reverse 621 from expirment 626 who after that game become good same with however they end it since this movie is accepting the good and the bad memories and not giving into axinty and stuff
If somehow Inside Out 3 becomes a thing, they should add in the emotion "Apathy" since that would be very fitting for people's attitudes towards a lot of modern entertainment.
After how many years of Disney calling their customers bigots, racists, homophobes, misogynists, etc., and repeat failure after failure, I expect them to do little course correction. I'll be surprised if they make their money back.
Same here. Not giving them any views or money. They don't deserve it after everything they've done. We need to make sure Disney knows their entire brand is toxic and everything they put out needs to fail.
@@ZanderHanna Deadpool 2 was pretty disappointing, so my expectations for the 3rd one are very low. I'm already very tired of Ryan Reynolds Deadpool humor
Both Disney and Pixar needed to "rethink their business model" ages ago. They've both been imposing wokeness and sexuality, and have both gotten similar results.
@@365ral so it’s not appropriate to show someone being gay or say a lesbian couple and if you’re talking about the transgender characters, they haven’t done one yet. The only thing they’ve done is show someone going through puberty which has been done by many many movie and no one complained about them.
@@filmaru8556the problem is that they did it blatantly and tastelessly. Talking about things like that is a private thing not a public thing. Yes, some people want to be more "open" about such things. There is a technical term for such people. That term is pervert.
@@filmaru8556 It's still disastrous risk for any kid's development at a very young age of 12 and under. They shouldn't be expose to that kind of content until they are more mature enough age to judge and make decisions for themselves without forcing it down in today's media targeting for families and children. Honestly, I think any contents containing any form of LGBTQ+ representation or activities should be on a higher rating like "PG-13" or "R".
No one cares. Continue living your cynical, cold life. The movie just had a very successful opening weekend. Even families are showing up. Keep crying, kid.
At this point, even if it becomes a success, I believe Pixar will eventually get folded into Walt Disney Animation. It's just too little too late to save this company.
Unless Insode out 2 ends up 1 billion dollars due to positive word of mouth saying this movie is decent and safe great kids movie and it ends up making a billion dollars saving Pixar and adding a gurtined sequel that will be good though 3:03 like toy story 4 thiers only so much you can do with Riley and the 3 new emotions after this movie and in number 3 where more will be added probably
If I had a penny for every time I have heard these big businesses say " we need to rethink our process" as a way of pretending they will change instead of actually doing ANYTHING to change I'd be able to afford to buy Disney
Even if they do, it is too late. Movies need time to make. And that is a thing they do no longer have on their side. Additionally to that trust is destroyed. This needs around 2 generations to "heal"
Show me a person who watched the original Toy Story as a child and I'll show you someone who gsve their toys the side eye for months afterwards whenever they left the room.
@@SUP-h9d is uninteresting cuz it's part of a studio who promotes everything that is so wrong in the entertainment industry, that it goes against their principal target, the audience.
Who is the main villain of this movie so this is incredible 2 again it won't be as good as the first but it should be at least almost as good as number 1
Inside Out 2 is like when a train carrying oil crashes with a gasoline truck. Both collide and end at the bottom of the lake, somehow it catches fire underwater... and explodes
@@mattdabeast315 sorry, my friend. But pixar pick a side, so if it fails, it's going to be a casuality of war, a war that disney start against their audience, a war that the mouse house is already.....losing.
Hopefully this success we need an inside out 3 and 4 proving Pixar hasn't lost it just that they were forced to play it diverse which led to zotopia but bad I'm elmreltal so yes Pixar going to succeed with this movie will make toy story 2 money probably it's a very everybody loves this movie safe is good especially for a sequel to the first movie psyce kinda villain or not anixety theeader and envy the one who hasn't been shown much are the two main villains well the third us just controlled by envy and anixety I'm guessing
I feel for Pixar, but how they treated their original boss by kicking him out and Inside Out I don't think needed a sequel and Pixar part of Disney... yeah, I have NO interest in it. And the new Emotions, don't like them... except maybe Envy.
The classic Pixar formula is really simple. Pick a fun fantasy world (the secret life of toys/bugs/monsters/rats/supers...) Introduce fun chatacters. Throw in a fun plot complication. Add a fun heist, a final challenge, fun heartwarming music, and done. Did I mention FUN? And no preaching or politics. How did they forget all this?
They destroyed the MCU, Star Wars, Indiana Jones... Pixar MIGHT stand a chance at recovering if they can get rid of the Disney Wokeness, I don't think the brand is totally trashed yet, but I'm not holding my breath.
Here's the problem; Pixar may now have the stain of Disney. Bob Ego has lied so often that his promises have no meaning anymore. 'Quieting the noise', 'quality rather than quantity', 'entertainment, not messaging'. All bullsh*t! Meanwhile, we get 'The Acolyte' Inclusivity still excludes the white, the straight and the male. And still, Disney's response to their own failure is to blame the fans. Narrative and agenda is all anyone expects from Lucasfilm and Marvel. I fear that Pixar is infected.
The entire mainstream entertainment industry is infected. Some projects just hide it better than others. Disney and Pixar are among the studios that have shed all pretense of wholesomeness. Instead of saying “We’re not evil, we’re good!”, their messaging is, “There’s really no such thing as evil-evil is actually good”.
If anything the Disney+ model is working. Because the first movie came out nearly 10 years ago, so that means a whole new generation of kids were watching the original on Disney+ and we’re very hyped up for this movie.
That was essentially what they said in that article. They didn't say as much explicitly, but I would say it was implied. Or maybe that's just my 20 or so years on the internet talking. Maybe I'm just so jaded that that's what I heard. *shrug*
I do NOT want to see a movie where a 13yo develops a libido and hormonal rager. I wouldn't want to take my kids who have yet to hit puberty to see such a movie, either. I didn't even want to see those sorts of movies when I was entering puberty. They were either cringe, awkward, or weird. Any adult that wants to see that kind of story sounds kind of sus.
@@JamorrisTysonWell, one, I don't trust anyone at Disney/Pixar to do it right. Not anymore. Maybe 20+ years ago, but not now. Second, my comment is in response to a reviewer briefly shown on RT that seemed disappointed that the movie didn't go further, away from the G rating, to touch on such things like libido and hormonal rager. In a Pixar movie. That's a parents choice, but if your kid is young, like 6 or 7 (the main demographic for Pixar), that is waaaaay too soon to be being exposed to such things and starting those conversations, imo. Especially when it comes to stories touching on sexuality or developing a libido. So those sorts of movies will either confuse them with topics they aren't ready for (and create awkward or problematic questions for unsuspecting parents) or just flat-out bore them because it goes right over their heads and they ask to go see Mario. That is what I was reacting to. I don't know what is in Inside Out 2, so I'm not making any comment about what happens in it. It could be perfectly appropriate. I just disagreed with that RT reviewers desire to see such subjects in a Pixar movie. Most parents going in to a kids movie blind will hope for better, more universal themes they can show a kid of any age. Like friendship, bravery, kindness, charity, honesty, patience, responsibility, forgiveness, working hard for what you want, overcoming adversity, doing what is right even if it is hard, don't be superficial, working together, etc. Puberty and libido, not so much.
Apart from thos movie they won't apart from many incredibles 3 up 2 ratio 2 wallow 2 and inside out 3 and maby that's about it cause they can't mak an original movie that can be sucefuly to save thier life oh forgot zotopia 2 the only other disey Pixar movie that's confirmed and they'll play it safe and it will be a hit despite being safe and not as good as the first just lil incrediblesv2 and I guess this movie
@@hunterculpepper1973 Only Incredibles, Toy Story, Inside OUt if they wouldnt have messed it up, but this sequel thiey did, Finding Nemo, and maybe Monsters Inc would work with sequels. (Although ONward would be an interesting one to give one to.) I mean sequels pretty much guaranteed to get people to check them out opening weekend at least, like this one.
I've been waiting for this video all day. I work at a mall that has a movie theatre and i saw so many parents with kids walking there. Gosh I hope the reviews are good. The Innocence and excitement on the kids faces made me recall seeing Disney films in the theatre. It's summer break, parents want to take a nap in their seat while kids laugh out loud lol. We'll see what happens ...
1:21: I’ve always believed that they switched Elio and Inside Out 2’s schedules to bank off IO2’s name recognition. After all, Pixar was marketing Elio, and now, all of a sudden they stopped that and IO2 came out, seemingly out of nowhere.
To be fair, the old Pixar movies was also about the personal experiences of the creators at the time. Monster Inc was about becoming a dad. Finding Nemo was about becoming a single parent.
Those are the kernels-the root from where the concepts begin. Good storytelling expands on that and broadens the scope to resonate with more people. As someone who isn’t a father or a single parent (or the child of a single parent), I could still connect with what those characters were going through, and there was a great deal more to the story than just the core idea. …It also helps if the creators are of sound mind as they examine and explore their experiences. Current Pixar/Disney is the equivalent of watching a story about a character’s first relationship told by someone who is horrifically co-dependent. The themes/experiences need to have broad reach, but the lens they are shown through also has to be one that reflects reality the way the vast majority of the audience sees it.
It tells you just where entertainment is right now when the bar is set so low, a movie or game or show just has to be reviewed as "It's okay" in order to get butts in seats anymore. It's utterly insane to think that only a few decades before, these studios producing something was a huge event, only to now be tested by public guinea pigs before everyone actually commits to giving it their attention.
25:37 I think Coco is a good example that shows its not even necessarily concept but execution. Not everyone relates to day of the dead festivities, that is very specifically cultural. And yet they framed it in such a way that it has mass appeal.
Sorry but it's safe and because it's gurtined to succeed or at least ne seen as a failure only because nobody really gies in theaters anymore and nobody watches disey or anything or this movie makes over a billion dollars like toystory 2 and 3 being quilty better than the first making more money making Pixar's inside out the replacement for toystory after the failure of toystory 4
I'm saying this movie might exceed expectations and confirm inside oout 3 and then conform at least one shity 4th one but two peak sequels saving Pixar by showing they can make thier first billion dollar franchise in what ever this movie has potential and either it because toy story 2 and 3 which by the way toystory the orginal flopped toystory 2 was the best disey movies of alm Time if inside out makes a billion Pixar either gets respected and funded more fir a sequel or two to inside out well disey making zootopia 2 which will absolutely make a billion dollars confirmed
Well the good news is that inside out 2 is insanely successful by critically and commercially (so far it had a really strong opening weekend especially it came out around father's day weekend)
"after the disappointing returns from part 5 we felt it was time for freddy to finally die, and I thought that since I'd helped create him then I should be the one to kill him for good" ~Rachel Talalay (interview from Never Sleep Again).
The universal relatable talk from Geeky is so true, simple yet very effective. Speaking of stuff that are mostly relatable to EVERYONE, wanna know what's interesting? Some younger audience' media even uses death as themes or something. Land before Time, Majora's Mask, etc. Death, although sensitive in some places, is part of life, and ANYONE could go through that in some means such as a lost one. "Fee-fee politics" on the hand? No. Only a TINY percentage will go nuts for that. Not even kids. Leave my childhood games alone, ya dang tweeting chooms.😂 Ted talk over...
I was pleasantly surprised with how the second Puss n’ Boots film tackled the concept of death. It wasn’t just a part of the story, it was the main theme, and I think they did a great job making accessible to a young audience.
Not for the writers there isn't. Besides, I'm sure when Disney wants someone to change the wiki stating it is an emotion, it would get changed yesterday.
Anxiety is just a different manifestion of fear, all the new "emotions" are basically mangling the original model that made inside out work in the first place.
Just because Inside Out 2 was made by Disney Pixar, that guarantees that my family will not watch this film opening weekend. If... IF we hear that the film is AMAZING, we might watch it the second or third weekend.
"Going to have to rethink our business model...." Ok - so grooming kids is your business model and if it doesn't work then you have to rethink it? Because not being evil isn't an option unless it doesn't sell?
@@JamorrisTyson How is it possible for every single person (at least in the US) to NOT KNOW that "non-straight people' exist? I worked with gay people in the 70s. I had gay teachers (and we all knew it) in the 60s. This is not about letting people know they "exist". This is about making sure that kids think this is the norm. It isn't the norm...and I am using norm in a statistical manner, btw.
Their flops are all fruit from the same tree: this modern thing where creators complain about "not seeing people like me" in movies and TV, and comics, so they go on to make stories about themselves and are shocked when nobody else wants to see that. The problem was never the movies about characters not like them. The problem was always the idea that you can't truly enjoy a story when you aren't in it. It is just too bad these creators didn't just solve it with fanfics instead of foisting it off on the public.
Are you telling me that cattering to 3% of the population, a group that in general has no kids, isn't good bussiness for a family/kids friendly studio? Whodathunkit
I saw the review on tpp channel, it confirmed to be a safe for family movie, but how Pixar and Disney convincing people to watch it on cinema is the real challenge
Is it really though? People on this side have praised things and begun ignoring when Hollywood sneaks in wokeness. Just because it's not in your face doesn't mean we should tolerate. Give them an inch and they take every franchise you care about and burn it down.
@@DavidMartinez-ce3lp Agreed. There is no middle ground to be had here. The moral erosion and social engineering (largely through normalization) needs to be completely removed. There’s no need for it. Sadly, the bar has been set so low that anyone starved for the newest thing will settle for anything that isn’t abhorrently perverse. Many people crave entertainment and genuinely want to like whatever feeds that appetite. It has taken some rather horrid productions to get the general audience to adjust its behavior. I’m actually concerned about a return to subtlety from these studios. Once the perversion is less ostentatious and good writing manages to creep back in, I fear most folks will once again embrace the filth, despite the same leadership being set on pushing the same seepage. It’ll still be poison-the concentration just won’t be as high.
I don't think it will flop, but I agree with the other part. Apparently *SPOILER* Riley has a panic attack in the movie and people are creaming in their pants on how "realtistic" it's depicted and I can't help but roll my eyes. I'm honestly so done with these mental health plots in kids movies. It doesn't even feel like it's written for kids; it comes off as being written for late 20-30-year-olds. I don't know, I grew up with the hard core Don Bluth films that were dark, scary, and taught good lessons and think all these new kids films want so desperately to be deep and thought provoking, but come off cringe instead.
" rethink" they say, what they have to do in reality is getting rid of all DEI departments , fire all woke people inside the company and start to make good movies again
It’s hilarious Some of the takes they have had recently. They seem to be cheering for Hollywood and the box office to die as if they would have anything whatsoever to discuss if that were to happen.
Well, when your Woke-dar is fried from overuse, you’re going to suspect everything of promoting homosexual race-communism before it comes out, even the non-political fluff that the studios put out to save their butts. You suspect everything of being a progressive trap, and you either learn to relax and judge stuff fairly or you end up in a cave, eating your own intestines and worshiping Kek.
No one cares. Continue living your cynical, cold life. The movie just had a very successful opening weekend. Families are showing up. Keep crying, hon.
Doesn't matter. It's like Iger's finally laying off hundreds including the DEI exec, right before an earnings call, when he's been told for years to do that because it's been necessary to start correcting the ship. And after the earnings call, plenty promises based on his actions hinting at finally making the right decisions and the share price going up, he'd wait a few more weeks to lull people into trusting him back before hiring a new DEI exec with even more political connections to the radical left. To put it more simply, I don't put any stock in Pixar righting the ship. It wouldn't surprise me they are choosing to do that one movie "right" in order to save their skin. And once the crisis has passed, they will go back plotting to shove DEI in their projects.
They need to fix their model now, and it will still be considered too little too late. Also, they need profits in the billions to make up everything they have lost in about 10 years now they keep not giving the audience what they ask for. This has to start all movies realese doing well; otherwise expect another year of no profit. Also, the failures with Dr. Who and Starwars are all ready very costly. Even if they play safe, it has to break bank. It needs to make more money than expected, as does every movie Disney makes going forward.
You know what "safe" is? Safe is that one movie that's kind of hard to remember was a Pixar movie. I can't remember what it was called, something Forward, Journey, ..Onward (literally had to look it up on Wikipedia). Something about a couple monster brothers having to find their invisible dad or something, and they only have his pants to go by. They drive a Scooby-Doo van. What was the ending? I think they find their dad near a statue with a magic coin or two.. something like that. THAT's what "safe" movies are - forgettable.
My one question/complaint is that i thought we already saw every emotion, i mean we saw the parents and they had the same "core" ones, so does this mean the new ones are temporary?
The new ones are "This is a sequel that we never planned to make so we had to come up with a story that doesn't make any sense as most of these extra emotions are basically a part of the original emotions"
With what was set up in the first movie it would've made way more sense to just have the existing five emotions be doing some things wrong in new situations. For anxiety, Fear could just freak out at situations that Riley doesn't have to be afraid of (interaction with boys, tests) and later learn that it's not necessary. The envy emotion could be Disgust overreacting to other people having cool things. This way it would've even given some of the characters good arcs while being more accurate to the psychological theory used in the first movie.
@@iceprism367 Exactly. I still wish this movie just expanded on the short they did after the movie with the emotions in animals and other people. All of them always just had the 5 emotions. They could have easilly done this movie better.
Color me sensitive, but Anxiety convinced me not to watch this movie. You can tell that the character design team is new and/or not committed to the previous work.
For so many, this could be the single biggest banger Disney has done in a decade and they still won't spend a dime on it because it's a Disney property and they've had quite enough.
Pixar is like a has been college football program that is long past their prime. It's like a team that currently has a 4-6 record, which is unthinkable considering their multiple 10+ win seasons and past national championships, and is now struggling to even make the postseason. Now Riley is back from injury, and the next game is winnable; it is against The Garfield Movie, which also has a 4-6 record, at home. Pixar's coach is on the hot seat: win or be fired.
I think this is the time fans need to boycott Disney the hardest. If this movie succeeds, they will take the lesson that they can bash the audience, make movies based on the message and then avoid the consequences.
Inside out 3 since it's Pixar toystory cash cow 2026 apathy pride and libido coming soon with the new and improved gang after this movie I'm assuming this was played safe like toy story it's still good which means inside out 2 is deafintly going to succeed same with a number 3 when it invetie gets before like toystory they mess up with inside out 4 with depression and stuff
That total bull crap you don't speak for everybody so you really don't know what's going on people that care about this movie are not exactly in small numbers the way you think it is
The low numbers will be because of the history of disney movies and recently the media fetishized riley as being gay. Making articles and youtube videos that she might be “exploring” her emotions or crush. Thats why i cancelled a group watch of the movie. Then finding out through reviews that its not like that. Its Disney/pixar fault if this movie fails, they want to play bait n switch and inject the “not so secret” gay agenda
I love how not having any gay characters is still somehow part of the evil plan of gay people who to destroy the world or something how much power do you think they have
@@JamorrisTysonGovernment, School boards, mainstream journalism, corporations such as disney.Why are you downgrading LGBT extremists to the point countless LGB,s have stated they left because of said extremism?
@@travelingsight8314 and many stay what do you mean by extremism anyway are trans people too extreme are people fighting for rights,and being seen too extreme
@@JamorrisTyson When you override women as many extreme trans do yes it's more sexist than any biological male could dream of. And what do you mean right to exist? They can get married people get more prosecuted speaking against LGBT than for. Stop acting like it's year zero progress has happened but now no one has anything to do so they push it to the extreme.
@@JamorrisTyson It's not year zero friend people can get married being LG or B you get more into trouble with media speaking against LBGT than for them. Also, the trans people who want to be left alone have a right to be. Keep on topic i,m talking about the extreme trans who want to erase woman such as going into woman's sports and taking advantage of their biological male testosterone muscles.
They should have kept John Lassiter. I imagine him giving Pixar another billion dollar success with Inside Out 2. I hope they fail so I have a chance to see good movies again from Pixar.
Disney is the cause of Pixar failures.
That's been going on for several years now. It's not really much of a secret.
Pretty sure both sides need to sign off on the DEI garbage, so both are responsible for the fall of both Disney and Pixar.
the DEI agency is. so the government in the end is the true villain.
Is the cause of everything fails. Shitney is the cancer of film industry & entertainment landscape.
@@ArphaliaShitney & pixar needs to sign off for good.
If this movie isn't Woke, I'll be completely shocked
I don't think it is. The only crash that Raily has is on a video game character that she has repressed her feelings on.
Pay attention to the background, they slide that stuff there when they can't put it at full display.
Disney has never been woke tell me a gay character please
@@ragemage3049 yes to hypnotize your children into becoming trans cause that how it works if you show people anything outside of "normal" it will corrupt their brain
@@JamorrisTysonThe black lady from Lightyear? I'm pretty sure she was lesbian.
The first Inside Out writers did extensive research into psychology to craft that story.
Toy Story 4 couldn't even get Andy's model right.
As far as I'm concerned, Toy Story 4 doesn't exist. It does enough things to retcon the past that it's like it doesn't even exist in the same universe.
@@DavidMartinez-ce3lpToy story concluded with 3
@@3dsfan2002 yup
Toy story 3 is true ending toy story 4 is not canon
@@DavidMartinez-ce3lp The way they disgraced Woody's character is enough for me to ignore the existence of Toy Story 4 altogether.
Let's all say it together since the writers need to hear it:
👏"We do not go to movies for your therapy sessions."👏
That's right, i'm not going to pay for a therapy session, if i can go for free!!!
☝☝☝ THAT'S WHAT IT FEELS LIKE, and NONE OF US need to go through it!
The ironic bit is that they try to make their stories more "inclusive" and in the process have only included themselves--as opposed to the timeless stories they used to tell which included everybody.
cringe emojis
I want to tell them that I go to the movies for MY therapy sessions and I'm not looking for a political lecture. To those who think that going to the movies for therapy is stupid, well at least it's better than boze and drugs.
I don't know how many people have seen Jeremy Jahns review of it, but he gave it a "Buy on Blu-ray" rating. I'm still not going to see it, because I've just had enough of Disney's crap.
If it's good watch it you'll reward good and disey keeps making good so incredibles 2 inside out 2 zotopia 2 are going to be the only disey movies I really have hope for being good at least on the level of the firsts but not as good seeing the reviews that's how it be disey makes a original movie with a slightly worse but still great sequel shrek and shrek 2 anyone toy story 1 and toy story 2 is how people are describing inside out 2 it's the toy story 2 to insides out toy story so in short so zootopia 2 will be like shrek 2 were some people say it's Beter than the first since some talented pepole are still at Disney working at Pixar and disey for inc4exibles 3 zotopia 2 and evtuly since this movie is doing well it'll be Pixar's toy story can't wait for inside out 4
Incredibles 3 I memt incredibles 2 was a example of how they Make a slightly worse first version or they go the shrek 2 route and some people say it's better than the first but since this one actually has a psude villain in axinty consisting how she acts she's more a reverse 621 from expirment 626 who after that game become good same with however they end it since this movie is accepting the good and the bad memories and not giving into axinty and stuff
I have. I won't watch Chris Stuckman's review. He doesn't really do reviews anymore.
I'll jack sparrow it, Disney is not getting my cash
don't buy it. don't even pirate it
If somehow Inside Out 3 becomes a thing, they should add in the emotion "Apathy" since that would be very fitting for people's attitudes towards a lot of modern entertainment.
Sorry buddy, but Ennui (boredom/apathy) already exists!
After how many years of Disney calling their customers bigots, racists, homophobes, misogynists, etc., and repeat failure after failure, I expect them to do little course correction. I'll be surprised if they make their money back.
They really did call their customers all those names. I wish I was joking.
They will make their money back
@@animezilla4486 that's never gonna happen.
Even if it’s good, I’m not giving the Mouse my money.
No one cares. Continue to live your cynical, cold life. The movie is succeeding.
I trust Jeremy Jahns' review of it, but I'll be damned if I'm giving the company who calls us all -ists and -phobes another dime of my money.
Same here. Not giving them any views or money. They don't deserve it after everything they've done. We need to make sure Disney knows their entire brand is toxic and everything they put out needs to fail.
Also trust Jeremy but since I liked the first movie I'll jack sparrow it
@@DavidMartinez-ce3lptrust me. With a film like Deadpool 3 i think they have learned their lesson
@@ZanderHanna Deadpool 2 was pretty disappointing, so my expectations for the 3rd one are very low. I'm already very tired of Ryan Reynolds Deadpool humor
@@DavidMartinez-ce3lp well hey! When Thor the dark world in 2013 came out people hated it. But then we got Thor ragnarok and it was amazing!
Both Disney and Pixar needed to "rethink their business model" ages ago. They've both been imposing wokeness and sexuality, and have both gotten similar results.
Sexuality isn’t the problem. It’s how their presenting it
@@filmaru8556 No, sexuality is a problem. It's not appropriate for kids.
@@365ral so it’s not appropriate to show someone being gay or say a lesbian couple and if you’re talking about the transgender characters, they haven’t done one yet. The only thing they’ve done is show someone going through puberty which has been done by many many movie and no one complained about them.
@@filmaru8556the problem is that they did it blatantly and tastelessly. Talking about things like that is a private thing not a public thing.
Yes, some people want to be more "open" about such things. There is a technical term for such people. That term is pervert.
@@filmaru8556 It's still disastrous risk for any kid's development at a very young age of 12 and under. They shouldn't be expose to that kind of content until they are more mature enough age to judge and make decisions for themselves without forcing it down in today's media targeting for families and children. Honestly, I think any contents containing any form of LGBTQ+ representation or activities should be on a higher rating like "PG-13" or "R".
Don't really care if it's good or not, I'm not giving Disney any money or views.
And that's the other problem... consumers have been effed over so much over the years even if something IS actually good, they'll ignore it.
@@GladDestrongerexactly
No one cares. Continue living your cynical, cold life. The movie just had a very successful opening weekend. Even families are showing up. Keep crying, kid.
Disney is done, all divisions, and the current leadership killed it.
dont care if its one of pixars best movies. F disney they are not getting another dime from me.
Go to universal studios
I hear Disney brought their A game here, but I'm not bringing my money in.
No one cares. Continue living your cynical, cold life. The movie just had a very successful opening weekend. Families are showing up. Keep crying.
DISNEY doesn't deserve any second chance.
The same evil people on top is still in the company.
Unfortunately 🙄
Speak for yourself
And they answer to the same equity firms like BlackRock who give them their marching orders along with their money.
Funny. The movie is suceeding as we speak. Keep crying.
At this point, even if it becomes a success, I believe Pixar will eventually get folded into Walt Disney Animation. It's just too little too late to save this company.
Unless Insode out 2 ends up 1 billion dollars due to positive word of mouth saying this movie is decent and safe great kids movie and it ends up making a billion dollars saving Pixar and adding a gurtined sequel that will be good though 3:03 like toy story 4 thiers only so much you can do with Riley and the 3 new emotions after this movie and in number 3 where more will be added probably
If I had a penny for every time I have heard these big businesses say " we need to rethink our process" as a way of pretending they will change instead of actually doing ANYTHING to change I'd be able to afford to buy Disney
Indeed, that sums up everything.
You'd probably have enough money to buy every single one of the businesses saying this crap at this point!
Hollywood radically needs to rethink a lot of things
Even if they do, it is too late. Movies need time to make. And that is a thing they do no longer have on their side.
Additionally to that trust is destroyed. This needs around 2 generations to "heal"
Show me a person who watched the original Toy Story as a child and I'll show you someone who gsve their toys the side eye for months afterwards whenever they left the room.
I hear it's not terrible. Yet... I am not going to give Disney another cent.
"It's not terrible." Certified Fresh!
Amen
Me neither. Not giving Disney any views or money
I saw it today, It's actually good, feels like Old Pixar in way. It's a step in the right direction
"It's not terrible......" Code for "I've seen worse......"
Hard pass. Uninteresting movie + Disney = I'm keeping me money.
I saw it today. It’s actually really good
How the hell is it "uninteresting"?
@@SUP-h9d is uninteresting cuz it's part of a studio who promotes everything that is so wrong in the entertainment industry, that it goes against their principal target, the audience.
Bet this is giving Pixar anxiety.
🐐 comment
Pixar mo longer exists
Speaking of anxiety, why does she look like Fregley from Diary of a wimpy kid?
Who is the main villain of this movie so this is incredible 2 again it won't be as good as the first but it should be at least almost as good as number 1
🍷👌
Inside Out 2 is like when a train carrying oil crashes with a gasoline truck. Both collide and end at the bottom of the lake, somehow it catches fire underwater... and explodes
Does it kill brave diverse lesbian fish of color?
And the clowns are on fire somehow
@@veggsbacon1891 They were the drivers
And somewhere, Michael Bay is standing there, watching it unfold, smiling with a pyromaniacal glee.....
A boycott to Pixar is a Boycott to Disney!!
So it’s a double win?
Let's boycott them!!!!
Wall-e best Disney movie in the last 10 years
Don’t do it guys we want Pixar to do well
@@mattdabeast315 sorry, my friend. But pixar pick a side, so if it fails, it's going to be a casuality of war, a war that disney start against their audience, a war that the mouse house is already.....losing.
Doing all I can to make sure they fail.
Hopefully this success we need an inside out 3 and 4 proving Pixar hasn't lost it just that they were forced to play it diverse which led to zotopia but bad I'm elmreltal so yes Pixar going to succeed with this movie will make toy story 2 money probably it's a very everybody loves this movie safe is good especially for a sequel to the first movie psyce kinda villain or not anixety theeader and envy the one who hasn't been shown much are the two main villains well the third us just controlled by envy and anixety I'm guessing
@@hunterculpepper1973enough with the sequels
Same here
The best part is "doing all you can" is really easy: you just don't do anything (outside of other things you actually like) lmao
The film was actually really good
I feel for Pixar, but how they treated their original boss by kicking him out and Inside Out I don't think needed a sequel and Pixar part of Disney... yeah, I have NO interest in it.
And the new Emotions, don't like them... except maybe Envy.
Disney: You must make DEI/ESG films preaching the message!
Also Disney: You must make money!
Like asking ice to spontaneously combust
Disney stock went under 100 today.
Those are rookie numbers. It should be lower
@@DavidMartinez-ce3lp Give it time, something tells me they won't get up again very soon
The audacity of Disney to threaten Pixar over their poor performance when Disney have been losing *BILLIONS* thanks to their willing incompetence!
The classic Pixar formula is really simple. Pick a fun fantasy world (the secret life of toys/bugs/monsters/rats/supers...) Introduce fun chatacters. Throw in a fun plot complication. Add a fun heist, a final challenge, fun heartwarming music, and done. Did I mention FUN? And no preaching or politics. How did they forget all this?
Indeed, Disney is pushing Pixar.
They destroyed the MCU, Star Wars, Indiana Jones... Pixar MIGHT stand a chance at recovering if they can get rid of the Disney Wokeness, I don't think the brand is totally trashed yet, but I'm not holding my breath.
@@captainz9 Pixar already lost their original identity in filmmaking a few years ago.
Disney needs to see that ESG scores doesn't protect them from failure and DEI mandates isn't a recipe for success.
I’m hyped for their failure!
So am i!!!
I'm certainly am not
Their train of failure is about to arrive at the next stop, yep.
Here's the problem; Pixar may now have the stain of Disney. Bob Ego has lied so often that his promises have no meaning anymore. 'Quieting the noise', 'quality rather than quantity', 'entertainment, not messaging'. All bullsh*t! Meanwhile, we get 'The Acolyte'
Inclusivity still excludes the white, the straight and the male.
And still, Disney's response to their own failure is to blame the fans.
Narrative and agenda is all anyone expects from Lucasfilm and Marvel. I fear that Pixar is infected.
The entire mainstream entertainment industry is infected. Some projects just hide it better than others. Disney and Pixar are among the studios that have shed all pretense of wholesomeness. Instead of saying “We’re not evil, we’re good!”, their messaging is, “There’s really no such thing as evil-evil is actually good”.
If anything the Disney+ model is working. Because the first movie came out nearly 10 years ago, so that means a whole new generation of kids were watching the original on Disney+ and we’re very hyped up for this movie.
Imagine telling the world that you hope the 12yo protagonist has an arousal arc.
They what?
Wait...WHAT?
That was essentially what they said in that article. They didn't say as much explicitly, but I would say it was implied.
Or maybe that's just my 20 or so years on the internet talking. Maybe I'm just so jaded that that's what I heard. *shrug*
I do NOT want to see a movie where a 13yo develops a libido and hormonal rager. I wouldn't want to take my kids who have yet to hit puberty to see such a movie, either.
I didn't even want to see those sorts of movies when I was entering puberty. They were either cringe, awkward, or weird. Any adult that wants to see that kind of story sounds kind of sus.
Puberty is natural just like death and love these movies when done right can help as a starting zone for conversations
@@JamorrisTysonWell, one, I don't trust anyone at Disney/Pixar to do it right. Not anymore. Maybe 20+ years ago, but not now.
Second, my comment is in response to a reviewer briefly shown on RT that seemed disappointed that the movie didn't go further, away from the G rating, to touch on such things like libido and hormonal rager. In a Pixar movie.
That's a parents choice, but if your kid is young, like 6 or 7 (the main demographic for Pixar), that is waaaaay too soon to be being exposed to such things and starting those conversations, imo. Especially when it comes to stories touching on sexuality or developing a libido. So those sorts of movies will either confuse them with topics they aren't ready for (and create awkward or problematic questions for unsuspecting parents) or just flat-out bore them because it goes right over their heads and they ask to go see Mario.
That is what I was reacting to. I don't know what is in Inside Out 2, so I'm not making any comment about what happens in it. It could be perfectly appropriate. I just disagreed with that RT reviewers desire to see such subjects in a Pixar movie.
Most parents going in to a kids movie blind will hope for better, more universal themes they can show a kid of any age. Like friendship, bravery, kindness, charity, honesty, patience, responsibility, forgiveness, working hard for what you want, overcoming adversity, doing what is right even if it is hard, don't be superficial, working together, etc. Puberty and libido, not so much.
@@JamorrisTyson"Mommy, what's secks?"
As currently constituted, Disney is incapable of correcting itself.
We saw what emotions adults have in the first Inside Out. Do they just kill off anxiety when people turn 18?
Disney/Pixar doesn’t deserve any money this year or any other year going forward.
Apart from thos movie they won't apart from many incredibles 3 up 2 ratio 2 wallow 2 and inside out 3 and maby that's about it cause they can't mak an original movie that can be sucefuly to save thier life oh forgot zotopia 2 the only other disey Pixar movie that's confirmed and they'll play it safe and it will be a hit despite being safe and not as good as the first just lil incrediblesv2 and I guess this movie
@@hunterculpepper1973 Only Incredibles, Toy Story, Inside OUt if they wouldnt have messed it up, but this sequel thiey did, Finding Nemo, and maybe Monsters Inc would work with sequels. (Although ONward would be an interesting one to give one to.) I mean sequels pretty much guaranteed to get people to check them out opening weekend at least, like this one.
Shitney/pixar don't deserve to exist anymore.
Disagree with that 900%
@@animezilla4486 too bad, challenge that 900% against 8000'000.000% who are against that dirty depraved company.
The reviews can be as good as they can get.
I ain't paying shit.
Sad they have to be told to play it safe, keep the nonsense out, and to make "another hit" instead of them just trying to tell a really great story.
They don’t have the writing talent to tell a great story.
@@s0davidtrue, all the talented people left
I've been waiting for this video all day. I work at a mall that has a movie theatre and i saw so many parents with kids walking there. Gosh I hope the reviews are good. The Innocence and excitement on the kids faces made me recall seeing Disney films in the theatre. It's summer break, parents want to take a nap in their seat while kids laugh out loud lol. We'll see what happens ...
Disney: get your shit together, Pixar, we're losing money.
Also Disney: Yesss Queeennn, slayyyy go ahead Lucasfilms.
What did Lucasflims do
@@JamorrisTyson star wars
1:21: I’ve always believed that they switched Elio and Inside Out 2’s schedules to bank off IO2’s name recognition. After all, Pixar was marketing Elio, and now, all of a sudden they stopped that and IO2 came out, seemingly out of nowhere.
Remember back on the days, Pixar was able to take D level Marvel Heroes and make a fantastic appealling movie with Big Hero 6.
Sadly, that one wasn't Pixar. Still a good movie though
@@constellarGallerist still mad it beat Song of the Sea and grab an Oscar, tho
To be fair, the old Pixar movies was also about the personal experiences of the creators at the time. Monster Inc was about becoming a dad. Finding Nemo was about becoming a single parent.
Those are the kernels-the root from where the concepts begin. Good storytelling expands on that and broadens the scope to resonate with more people. As someone who isn’t a father or a single parent (or the child of a single parent), I could still connect with what those characters were going through, and there was a great deal more to the story than just the core idea. …It also helps if the creators are of sound mind as they examine and explore their experiences. Current Pixar/Disney is the equivalent of watching a story about a character’s first relationship told by someone who is horrifically co-dependent. The themes/experiences need to have broad reach, but the lens they are shown through also has to be one that reflects reality the way the vast majority of the audience sees it.
If *_Inside Out 2_* fails, then *_Toy Story 5_* is in major trouble.
Tbh we didn't even need Toy Story 4
I mean I wasn’t even having much hope for the film anyways but now I’m scared for it
@@HeroTheHedgehog999 If the movie is good, then I might go see it.
Then it would earn my respect.
@@PizzaCat4yhwh I still kind of agree with that.
That's coming from someone who actually likes *_Toy Story 4._*
@Bludgeta9001 as far as I'm concerned Toy Story 4 never happened. It ended with Toy Story 3 and the short films as an epilogue.
Oh, how the mighty fall...
Their stuff sucks now.
It tells you just where entertainment is right now when the bar is set so low, a movie or game or show just has to be reviewed as "It's okay" in order to get butts in seats anymore.
It's utterly insane to think that only a few decades before, these studios producing something was a huge event, only to now be tested by public guinea pigs before everyone actually commits to giving it their attention.
If the lightyear movie was based off the tv show story even if it was it's own cannon the movie would have been huge.
That could've been their new franchise after Toy Story finished
That show was great. Missed opportunity
@@constellarGallerist Yeah, I thought it was a slam dunk at first until I found out what the movie actually was.
I hope this flops horribly
anything that ends Disney faster is a good thing
no saving that train wreck
Don't be so sure talking about being spiteful I wouldn't wish this on any other studio
25:37 I think Coco is a good example that shows its not even necessarily concept but execution. Not everyone relates to day of the dead festivities, that is very specifically cultural. And yet they framed it in such a way that it has mass appeal.
In that case, I really hope it fails so that we don't have to deal with crappy sequels
Um, they are trying to push agendas here and they need to make crappy sequels in order to support trashy films like Elio.
Sorry but it's safe and because it's gurtined to succeed or at least ne seen as a failure only because nobody really gies in theaters anymore and nobody watches disey or anything or this movie makes over a billion dollars like toystory 2 and 3 being quilty better than the first making more money making Pixar's inside out the replacement for toystory after the failure of toystory 4
I'm saying this movie might exceed expectations and confirm inside oout 3 and then conform at least one shity 4th one but two peak sequels saving Pixar by showing they can make thier first billion dollar franchise in what ever this movie has potential and either it because toy story 2 and 3 which by the way toystory the orginal flopped toystory 2 was the best disey movies of alm Time if inside out makes a billion Pixar either gets respected and funded more fir a sequel or two to inside out well disey making zootopia 2 which will absolutely make a billion dollars confirmed
@@hunterculpepper1973 Your username implies you're at least 50, but your rambling and grammar/spelling mistakes make me think you're either 12 or 80.
@@kipolem53 what agenda explain
It won’t gross as much as it should if it is good. There has been too much brand damage.
Well the good news is that inside out 2 is insanely successful by critically and commercially (so far it had a really strong opening weekend especially it came out around father's day weekend)
"after the disappointing returns from part 5 we felt it was time for freddy to finally die, and I thought that since I'd helped create him then I should be the one to kill him for good"
~Rachel Talalay (interview from Never Sleep Again).
It’s been done for a while now to be fair. Lassiter brought the magic.
The universal relatable talk from Geeky is so true, simple yet very effective.
Speaking of stuff that are mostly relatable to EVERYONE, wanna know what's interesting? Some younger audience' media even uses death as themes or something. Land before Time, Majora's Mask, etc. Death, although sensitive in some places, is part of life, and ANYONE could go through that in some means such as a lost one.
"Fee-fee politics" on the hand? No. Only a TINY percentage will go nuts for that. Not even kids. Leave my childhood games alone, ya dang tweeting chooms.😂
Ted talk over...
I was pleasantly surprised with how the second Puss n’ Boots film tackled the concept of death. It wasn’t just a part of the story, it was the main theme, and I think they did a great job making accessible to a young audience.
Good quality over big quantity should be the rule.
Disney will never learn their lesson.
Anxiety is NOT an emotion. It's a mental disorder. There's a big difference.
Not for the writers there isn't. Besides, I'm sure when Disney wants someone to change the wiki stating it is an emotion, it would get changed yesterday.
Anxiety is simply a type of fear.
And we already have fear.
Was it better to go with a character named "worry".
Its kinda is
Anxiety is just a different manifestion of fear, all the new "emotions" are basically mangling the original model that made inside out work in the first place.
Just because Inside Out 2 was made by Disney Pixar, that guarantees that my family will not watch this film opening weekend. If... IF we hear that the film is AMAZING, we might watch it the second or third weekend.
Seems like it did just fine at the box office.
"Going to have to rethink our business model...."
Ok - so grooming kids is your business model and if it doesn't work then you have to rethink it? Because not being evil isn't an option unless it doesn't sell?
How is it grooming to show non straight people existing
How the hell is having gay or lesbian characters grooming, homophobe!?
@@JamorrisTyson How is it possible for every single person (at least in the US) to NOT KNOW that "non-straight people' exist? I worked with gay people in the 70s. I had gay teachers (and we all knew it) in the 60s. This is not about letting people know they "exist". This is about making sure that kids think this is the norm. It isn't the norm...and I am using norm in a statistical manner, btw.
Their flops are all fruit from the same tree: this modern thing where creators complain about "not seeing people like me" in movies and TV, and comics, so they go on to make stories about themselves and are shocked when nobody else wants to see that. The problem was never the movies about characters not like them. The problem was always the idea that you can't truly enjoy a story when you aren't in it. It is just too bad these creators didn't just solve it with fanfics instead of foisting it off on the public.
Boycott Disney period
No
Shut up, child.
We have two kids, and neither of them has any interest in watching this. They want to go see Minions instead. haha
Are you telling me that cattering to 3% of the population, a group that in general has no kids, isn't good bussiness for a family/kids friendly studio? Whodathunkit
I saw the review on tpp channel, it confirmed to be a safe for family movie, but how Pixar and Disney convincing people to watch it on cinema is the real challenge
Broken trust is hard to get back.
@@richardstrand2130 yep
It has a bad ethos and the ending sounds like something too terrifying to ever be seen.
Is it really though? People on this side have praised things and begun ignoring when Hollywood sneaks in wokeness. Just because it's not in your face doesn't mean we should tolerate. Give them an inch and they take every franchise you care about and burn it down.
@@DavidMartinez-ce3lp Agreed. There is no middle ground to be had here. The moral erosion and social engineering (largely through normalization) needs to be completely removed. There’s no need for it. Sadly, the bar has been set so low that anyone starved for the newest thing will settle for anything that isn’t abhorrently perverse. Many people crave entertainment and genuinely want to like whatever feeds that appetite. It has taken some rather horrid productions to get the general audience to adjust its behavior. I’m actually concerned about a return to subtlety from these studios. Once the perversion is less ostentatious and good writing manages to creep back in, I fear most folks will once again embrace the filth, despite the same leadership being set on pushing the same seepage. It’ll still be poison-the concentration just won’t be as high.
it's gonna flop because mental health as a theme has already been run to the ground
You don't know that
I don't think it will flop, but I agree with the other part. Apparently *SPOILER* Riley has a panic attack in the movie and people are creaming in their pants on how "realtistic" it's depicted and I can't help but roll my eyes. I'm honestly so done with these mental health plots in kids movies. It doesn't even feel like it's written for kids; it comes off as being written for late 20-30-year-olds. I don't know, I grew up with the hard core Don Bluth films that were dark, scary, and taught good lessons and think all these new kids films want so desperately to be deep and thought provoking, but come off cringe instead.
@@GPMM213It worked better with puss in boots the last wish.
this didn't age well at all
@@cabbagelover8574 is monetary success all the movie has going for it? what's next, Drake is a good rapper because of Spotify streams?
" rethink" they say, what they have to do in reality is getting rid of all DEI departments , fire all woke people inside the company and start to make good movies again
You predicted this was going to tank horribly at the box office, looks like you were completely 100% dead wrong on that one.
They have some shock jock moments
It’s hilarious Some of the takes they have had recently. They seem to be cheering for Hollywood and the box office to die as if they would have anything whatsoever to discuss if that were to happen.
Well, when your Woke-dar is fried from overuse, you’re going to suspect everything of promoting homosexual race-communism before it comes out, even the non-political fluff that the studios put out to save their butts. You suspect everything of being a progressive trap, and you either learn to relax and judge stuff fairly or you end up in a cave, eating your own intestines and worshiping Kek.
Either Disney & Hollywood will go back to common sense to survive, or it will continue to go down the road of destruction. Either way, you lose.
@@perfectq7206What kind of Irish Pudding fallacy is that?
Diswokeney stabbed me in the back how many times and said it was my fault and again there saying trust me? Nope never again!
No one cares. Continue living your cynical, cold life. The movie just had a very successful opening weekend. Families are showing up. Keep crying, hon.
Welp Disney needs to do a reset button Too bad for Pixar
WALL-E is best Disney movie in the last 10 years.
The first 5-10 min of the movie
- no explosions
- no voice over
Wall-e just doing his thing
And I have zero interest in this movie.
Sad where this once great studio has ended up.
It seems that Pixar is trying to "right the ship." The same thing can't be said of Lucasfilm.
Doesn't matter. It's like Iger's finally laying off hundreds including the DEI exec, right before an earnings call, when he's been told for years to do that because it's been necessary to start correcting the ship. And after the earnings call, plenty promises based on his actions hinting at finally making the right decisions and the share price going up, he'd wait a few more weeks to lull people into trusting him back before hiring a new DEI exec with even more political connections to the radical left.
To put it more simply, I don't put any stock in Pixar righting the ship. It wouldn't surprise me they are choosing to do that one movie "right" in order to save their skin. And once the crisis has passed, they will go back plotting to shove DEI in their projects.
Lucasfilm broke in half and is sinking like the Titanic.
They need to fix their model now, and it will still be considered too little too late.
Also, they need profits in the billions to make up everything they have lost in about 10 years now they keep not giving the audience what they ask for.
This has to start all movies realese doing well; otherwise expect another year of no profit. Also, the failures with Dr. Who and Starwars are all ready very costly.
Even if they play safe, it has to break bank. It needs to make more money than expected, as does every movie Disney makes going forward.
You know what "safe" is? Safe is that one movie that's kind of hard to remember was a Pixar movie. I can't remember what it was called, something Forward, Journey, ..Onward (literally had to look it up on Wikipedia). Something about a couple monster brothers having to find their invisible dad or something, and they only have his pants to go by. They drive a Scooby-Doo van. What was the ending? I think they find their dad near a statue with a magic coin or two.. something like that. THAT's what "safe" movies are - forgettable.
Why would I want to watch a coked-out Fraggle as Anxiety? Just seems like a bad time.
You had me at "coked-out Fraggle". The mental imagery alone was worth it. +1000 internets for you.
@@BigDaddyJinx To be fair I picked it up from another TH-cam channel that made that reference...
@@djbehrens I don't care who coined it - that was brilliant beyond measure. LOL
Wow! Have we got to a stage where the first thing people say about a film is that it's 'safe'
All dismal disney makes are box office disasters
Well. It's still NO to me.
No one cares.
My one question/complaint is that i thought we already saw every emotion, i mean we saw the parents and they had the same "core" ones, so does this mean the new ones are temporary?
The new ones are "This is a sequel that we never planned to make so we had to come up with a story that doesn't make any sense as most of these extra emotions are basically a part of the original emotions"
With what was set up in the first movie it would've made way more sense to just have the existing five emotions be doing some things wrong in new situations. For anxiety, Fear could just freak out at situations that Riley doesn't have to be afraid of (interaction with boys, tests) and later learn that it's not necessary. The envy emotion could be Disgust overreacting to other people having cool things. This way it would've even given some of the characters good arcs while being more accurate to the psychological theory used in the first movie.
@@iceprism367 Exactly. I still wish this movie just expanded on the short they did after the movie with the emotions in animals and other people.
All of them always just had the 5 emotions. They could have easilly done this movie better.
Color me sensitive, but Anxiety convinced me not to watch this movie. You can tell that the character design team is new and/or not committed to the previous work.
That character design reminds me of Big Mouth,which I despise!
@@andy-floriplay-time7366no it doesn't it's not even close
Until they cut the chord with Disney I say NOPE!
If Inside Out 2 isn’t a bad movie, I guarantee that this is going to get the Furiosa treatment.
Don't be so sure
For so many, this could be the single biggest banger Disney has done in a decade and they still won't spend a dime on it because it's a Disney property and they've had quite enough.
@@animezilla4486 it has a lot of bad publicity to overcome, and families have lost trust in Disney/Pixar.
If it’s Disney I ain’t going. Disney must work 10 times as hard to get my trust
Disney needs to work on themselves they should not worry about bringing people who hate them
I’m still wondering, why did they call her Ennui? Why not just call her boredom?
Cause they're so Smrt, they need to show how much smrter than everyone else they are
idk. seems more like a lack of emotions engagement instead of warranting an emotion.
That's probably the medical term for it. Just like they call it fatigue, instead of tiredness.
It's French. The history of the word goes back to the Late Latin word for "annoy": inodiare.
@@riduckulus1574 dude it is not the end of the world that they tell you a new word exists calm down
Pixar is like a has been college football program that is long past their prime. It's like a team that currently has a 4-6 record, which is unthinkable considering their multiple 10+ win seasons and past national championships, and is now struggling to even make the postseason.
Now Riley is back from injury, and the next game is winnable; it is against The Garfield Movie, which also has a 4-6 record, at home. Pixar's coach is on the hot seat: win or be fired.
I think this is the time fans need to boycott Disney the hardest. If this movie succeeds, they will take the lesson that they can bash the audience, make movies based on the message and then avoid the consequences.
I suspect it'll do middling opening weekend, and will ultimately meet its budget after a month.
RIP Pixar. Get woke, go broke.
100% bull crap
Going to see this at the drive in tonight with my daughter. Will update afterwards.
Apathy is all that's left. Those who cared are either in small numbers or have left already.
Inside out 3 since it's Pixar toystory cash cow 2026 apathy pride and libido coming soon with the new and improved gang after this movie I'm assuming this was played safe like toy story it's still good which means inside out 2 is deafintly going to succeed same with a number 3 when it invetie gets before like toystory they mess up with inside out 4 with depression and stuff
That total bull crap you don't speak for everybody so you really don't know what's going on people that care about this movie are not exactly in small numbers the way you think it is
Safe makes me think boring. Safe makes me think "nothing new."
The low numbers will be because of the history of disney movies and recently the media fetishized riley as being gay. Making articles and youtube videos that she might be “exploring” her emotions or crush. Thats why i cancelled a group watch of the movie. Then finding out through reviews that its not like that. Its Disney/pixar fault if this movie fails, they want to play bait n switch and inject the “not so secret” gay agenda
I love how not having any gay characters is still somehow part of the evil plan of gay people who to destroy the world or something how much power do you think they have
@@JamorrisTysonGovernment, School boards, mainstream journalism, corporations such as disney.Why are you downgrading LGBT extremists to the point countless LGB,s have stated they left because of said extremism?
@@travelingsight8314 and many stay what do you mean by extremism anyway are trans people too extreme are people fighting for rights,and being seen too extreme
@@JamorrisTyson When you override women as many extreme trans do yes it's more sexist than any biological male could dream of. And what do you mean right to exist? They can get married people get more prosecuted speaking against LGBT than for. Stop acting like it's year zero progress has happened but now no one has anything to do so they push it to the extreme.
@@JamorrisTyson It's not year zero friend people can get married being LG or B you get more into trouble with media speaking against LBGT than for them.
Also, the trans people who want to be left alone have a right to be.
Keep on topic i,m talking about the extreme trans who want to erase woman such as going into woman's sports and taking advantage of their biological male testosterone muscles.
They should have kept John Lassiter. I imagine him giving Pixar another billion dollar success with Inside Out 2. I hope they fail so I have a chance to see good movies again from Pixar.
Last nail in the coffin, more like.
That's completely ridiculous you don't know what you're talking about