The Twin Paradox; dogs/cats paradox or whatever.. Part 1 of 3.

What is the game? Language.
If it does not inspire you iti is not science. It is politics as usual.
Brace yourself. It is a long video.
There is a big difference between bamboozlement and inspiration.
So I finally decided to see if I can put Einstein's entire science in one page. The actual main characters. And here it is.
In Einstein's theory of relativity there are no forces and absolutes. He tossed them out. Hence the term relativity.
The term time dilation was not split into two different types. Instead there were the mutual symmetrical type and the breaking symmetry type. Instead of acceleration ( which would have implied force), the term equivalence principle is used.
Constant motion has no force and goes with flat spacetime along and everything being relatively symmetric.
When the rocket ignites its thrusters in empty space, instead of being viewed as a force acting on the vessel made of atoms having resonant frequencies, spacetime becomes hyperbolic at that moment instead of remaining flat.
Atoms having mass and clustering together exerting pressure (i.e. force) upon each other and becoming a planet affecting the electromagnetic interaction at the level of atoms and reducing the quantity of planck's quantum of action, i.e. energy exchange = time, instead the slowing down of time is caused by its own type of geometry called geodesic and so it is not force acting at the atomic level but spacetime surrounding the mass.
Also at the atomic level the entire electromagnetic interaction is also caused by relativity instead of forces being at work and called relative interaction which manifests as electric and magnetic interaction.
So after it is all said and done,the science that Einstein started there are no forces and if anything there are fields.
And to explain all the constant relative motion observed in the universe there must have been a primordial force that originated before the mass was to be around to move in nice relative motion in the first place instead of accelerating from rest to the constant relativistic speed. The rest state was already in motion at its inception. There seem to be about 20 of these relativistic constant motions in the universe.
Energy/mass. Space/time. Both lose meaning in that first Bang. That is where the buck stops for everybody.
For those who are serious they will not refrain from reading the link below.
magicschoolbook...

[@alchemy1]

"The twins paradox proves that there's an absolute frame of reference by showing that clocks can tick at definitively different rates from each other under the governance of their absolute speeds of motion through the space fabric.
If we give the stay-at-home twin clock A, then the other twin can travel with clock B away and back at 0.866c. On return, when they compare their timings for the separation, clock A ticked twice as many times as clock B, so clock B was clearly ticking slow due to its faster speed of motion through the space fabric.
Fans of STR will assert that you have to switch to GTR to account for the action here because it involves accelerations, and they imagine that something magical happens at those points where clock B is accelerating, but we can eliminate the role for that magic simply by introducing two additional clocks. Clock C travels alongside clock B on the outward leg, and clock D travels alongside clock B on the return leg. Neither of these new clocks accelerates at any point.
Clock C makes a timing from when it passes clock A until it passes clock D. Clock D makes a timing from when it passes clock C to when it passes clock A.
Timing B = timings C+D, confirming that the only role for the accelerations of clock B was to change its absolute speed of motion through space. We get the result timing A = 2(C+D). In all cases with the twins paradox, you get A > C+D.
If there was no space fabric and no absolute frame, clocks A, C and D would all have no option other than to tick at the same rate as each other, but that would give us the result A = C+D, which is a result that the universe never provides"
Courtesy of David Cooper.

[@stewiesaidthat]

Motion is absolute. Since the speed of light is the fastest any object can travel in space, you can measure your speed using light as the constant.
To solve the twin paradox, you just need to know some basic physics and biology since we are dealing with a biological entity.
Force/Mass/Acceleration and Frame Of Reference.
A Frame of Reference is any object independently accelerating. A passenger on a plane, sitting in their seat, is part of the mass of the plane and is considered at rest.
Light travels independently of the source and is thus in its own Frame of Reference.
The Twin Paradox problem is to solve for aging (acceleration).
The mass is thus a biological entity.
The force that induces aging - caloric intake (plant and animal protein).
From the formula Force = Mass * Acceleration, we substitute Calories for Force, Cells for Mass, and Aging for Acceleration.
Since no values are given for caloric intake (Force), we take the fact that the traveling twin is at rest within the spaceship and arrive at the twins being the same age.
Where does time dilation come from : not properly understanding what a Frame of Reference is.
For a clock in motion (at rest or independently accelerating), there are two forces to account for, the force of the source and the force of the electromagnetic wave. For an electromagnetic wave, its force is determined by its frequency.
In the moving clock experiments, the force of the source changes without a corresponding change in the force of the source (hertz). This leads to the classical 'time-dilation' and resulting error of improperly measuring time.
Since motion is absolute and time is a measurement of motion, then time is also absolute. Your rate of motion through the spacetime continuum can vary with a change in force, but it can never exceed the speed of light.

[@alchemy1]

Nice attempt. Except a huge problem with all that.
It is not about spaceships, it is not about some biological whatever. Those are all just decoy and distractions. It has no relavence and has nothing to do with subject matter at all. This is not about cats and dogs and plants and people.
Einstein said nothing relating to some person. So out the window they all go.
Just consider two clocks.
In fact just consider two atoms moving at relativistic speed, held by so called coloumbs force ( electrostatic force or whatever you want to call it) and the rest of gymnastics that go with it. Try it. See what youi get from this set up.

[@stewiesaidthat]

@@alchemy1 nope. You are still way off base. Atoms are held together by the strong and weak nuclear forces. It takes a tremendous amount of force to break those bonds. E=Mc2.
Clocks in motion run slow because light travels independent of its source. A change in force on the source must be applied to the electromagnetic wave in order for the clock to keep time.
Since the electromagnetic force is preset and doesn't change with a change in force on the source, what you end up with is a clock that is measuring relative motion/change in force on the source.

[@alchemy1]

@@stewiesaidthat Strong and weak forces operate within the nucleus.
Electromagnetic forces operate between electrons and the nucleus.
Electrostatic forces bond atoms and molecules
This is high school stuff.
It takes no tremendous forces to break electrostatic bonds for gods sake or we wll have no compounds of any kind. You can separate the hydrogen and oxygen atoms in water just by hydrolesis for petes sake. Just a simple chemical reacrtion for the vast majority. For god's sake this is high school stuff.
You can sepearate hydrogen molecules by meretly putting a solution of hydrosulfuric acid and water in a car battery and just simply run current through it. Are you getting this?
To break the nuclous apart, that takes your tremendous force to get the ball rolling.
Somebody needs to do more homework. I bet it is me.Right?
People will be reading all this and they have internet search engines. Although some sites are full of it.
I will not respond further. Done with this