Thank you for watching Benita's presentation. You can find more on the #ScienceOfCricket here: th-cam.com/play/PLI7VLEjUJidBb-_JAxGPOKpuei5WsXkcZ.html, including a full lecture on cricket bowling biomechanics: th-cam.com/video/HDl4FIUguC8/w-d-xo.html or cricket bowling and the lumbar spine: th-cam.com/video/2ysvXE59Q3I/w-d-xo.html Please note that I do reply to questions/comments, but all previous responses have been lost in transitioning the channel over to my new email address.
I am Physio from Pakistan Cricket Board, I agree with the difference of IO muscle thickness in fast bowler and also in spinner who have more rotatory component in their action. This difference is obvious in all active bowlers and might diminish in non active bowlers, this difference is perhaps due to inactivity of injured bowler during injury, not a primary cause of that injury.
Thank you for watching Benita's presentation. You can find more on the #ScienceOfCricket here: th-cam.com/play/PLI7VLEjUJidBb-_JAxGPOKpuei5WsXkcZ.html, including a full lecture on cricket bowling biomechanics: th-cam.com/video/HDl4FIUguC8/w-d-xo.html or cricket bowling and the lumbar spine: th-cam.com/video/2ysvXE59Q3I/w-d-xo.html Please note that I do reply to questions/comments, but all previous responses have been lost in transitioning the channel over to my new email address.
Thanks for the brilliant research and presentation. It was enlightening.
I am Physio from Pakistan Cricket Board,
I agree with the difference of IO muscle thickness in fast bowler and also in spinner who have more rotatory component in their action. This difference is obvious in all active bowlers and might diminish in non active bowlers, this difference is perhaps due to inactivity of injured bowler during injury, not a primary cause of that injury.