One of the best live performances, even though some of the polyphony was neglected and rushed over - this was played alongside selections of Sorabji and Szymanowski in a monstrous 1.5 hour recital... certainly inhuman playing
That is the most impossible thing I have ever seen! His virtuosity is mostrous! But i still prefer Hamelin's ingterpretation, the voices are heard better in his tempo and there is more energy, but still, this interpretation is so astonishing and tremendous!!
@teodorb.p.composer Me too, but his performance of the fugue is my favourite out of everyone. Especially the part where it goes ballistic, I think the tempo makes it sound really cool and menacing.
@@xcy8161He is. Just listen to his Medtner, Feinberg or Alkan. And of course his Godowsky, or his pieces are played perfectly! His repertoir is so big, plus in most examples are his interpretations always the best ones!!
Atrocious performance. The playing is inaccurate and rushed and most of the polyphonic material is neglected. It's not humanly possible to play this piece at this tempo
Atrocious is a bit too much to say, but I agree that most of the polyphonic ideas are neglected. The tempo is fine, he just had the wrong material/the wrong ideas, and it's still a very valid performance.
@@lucasdanconia do you have the slightest idea how technically borderline insane this piece is? ''mediocre'' is insane. I bet that 99,99999% of pianists, and yes this is a real guess, dont have the technical capacity this dude here has, even though the interpretation wasn't the best.
![Mily Balakirev - Piano Sonata No. 2, Op. 102 (1900-1905) [Score-Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/R-ATLXEcaV0/mqdefault.jpg)
man really uploaded the whole thing with sheet pogchamp
I was bored. I took me like, 3 hours straight of editing though
This is breath taking
One of the best live performances, even though some of the polyphony was neglected and rushed over - this was played alongside selections of Sorabji and Szymanowski in a monstrous 1.5 hour recital... certainly inhuman playing
his n6 is definitely rushing, that i cannot notice whole context of the piece. monotonous, firmly, untouchable.
I know he can do it better. Looking forward to listening to the re-take.
The recording he posted on his channel some months prior is better in my opinion. At least for the 3rd mvt. He is far more accurate and powerful.
Thank you for your suggestion. I noticed that recording only now! Yes, that one was far better with rich nuance and accuracy. loved it.
He didn’t take this performance seriously at all, which is a shame cause with effort into the intepertation he can make a stunning recording
The level of technique is impressive, but in my opinion this is an example of why faster does not mean better.
That is the most impossible thing I have ever seen! His virtuosity is mostrous! But i still prefer Hamelin's ingterpretation, the voices are heard better in his tempo and there is more energy, but still, this interpretation is so astonishing and tremendous!!
huang is still under 25 and hamelin is arguably the best living pianist, so he has time to improve
@teodorb.p.composer Me too, but his performance of the fugue is my favourite out of everyone. Especially the part where it goes ballistic, I think the tempo makes it sound really cool and menacing.
@@ryzikx nah, Hamelin is definitely not the best living pianist
@@ryzikxYeah, Hamelin is so astonishing!
@@xcy8161He is. Just listen to his Medtner, Feinberg or Alkan. And of course his Godowsky, or his pieces are played perfectly! His repertoir is so big, plus in most examples are his interpretations always the best ones!!
He is reaching the realm of gods
@@epointerwinboie nah more like the relm of 666 satanic demon
Very beautiful and impressive!
Incredible performance!!!
And he played this for like 3 or 4 people??? WTF??? What a privilege!
how old is he when he played the sonata?
@@FranzLiszt0904 21 I think
@@Jartious 22. His birthday is in March
11:05 Huang, 13:10 Sirodo, 14:35 Hamelin
Noice
Lol I saw your "noice" comment on la clochette
Not the most clean interpretation, but dope has hell to listen to and musically quite good.
This looks way harder than Rach sonatas and most Liszt stuff
And it sounds amazing the way you play it too. Loved it
@@ZeanIkLaurie It's not me playing, It's th-cam.com/channels/m7eD_NTK-oZa3JUvhQLYpg.html
Uh, harder?💀 yeah just a bit…
@@DynastieArtistique I love how your profile picture is impetuoso
@@Jartious happy you noticed hahaha
a little too fast for my taste but a brave attempt regardless
Hello! (:
Hello
Not for my taste but a good performance nontheless
such a shame, that he cut his hair :(
it had something unique....
Atrocious performance. The playing is inaccurate and rushed and most of the polyphonic material is neglected. It's not humanly possible to play this piece at this tempo
He plays things at original tempo which is why it sounds rushed.
And this was probably the best one from that recital lmao
I totally disagree. It is a phenomenal performance in many aspects.
@@CamilleBraiki explain yourself then
Atrocious is a bit too much to say, but I agree that most of the polyphonic ideas are neglected. The tempo is fine, he just had the wrong material/the wrong ideas, and it's still a very valid performance.
Inhuman playing
not inhuman at all unless you consider the human to be the mediocre and unremarkable
@@lucasdanconiachicklet where did u go
@@lucasdanconia which it is
@@lucasdanconia do you have the slightest idea how technically borderline insane this piece is? ''mediocre'' is insane. I bet that 99,99999% of pianists, and yes this is a real guess, dont have the technical capacity this dude here has, even though the interpretation wasn't the best.
@@letsbrawl945 I think you misunderstood the point he was making