This guy didn't care about the trial. He was there to defend his profession against the unethical and scientifically questionable testimony and practices of the discount Dr Doofenshmirtz impostor who testified yesterday. He did a great job too. The best way to discredit some "expert" is to bring on an actual expert with more publications than most people have traffic tickets, who tells the "expert" that they are an idiot.
Yesterday we saw how a psychiatrist should NOT be, today we saw and heard how a true professional who likely cares about patients and helps sounds. As someone who has seen many and had the bad and the good, I’ve learned to pick up the differences. Would def prefer a person like this over the Crypt Keeper.
Johnny Depp Experts:: "I have 30+ years of experience in the filed, wrote 50+books" Amber Heard Experts: "I have a diploma laying around somewhere i swear and also i really need the money"
Finally a specialist who is so pleasant to listen to. He's delivering a lot of consistent information, very calmly, looks like a class at college for sure
This is what you call a real expert. Calm, knowledgable, respectful, know and remember literally everything and every detail in his reviews of depositions, evidences. Every single witnesses from Depp's side is like this, that should tell you something. Such a big difference from Dr. Smeagul.
@@MelbourneArchviz It is entirely possible but he had already won the court of public opinion. His career will be revived no matter the outcome of this trial. But it's still a bummer that if AH won, even tho her career will go down the drain, she still have the money from the counter-suit.
@@sonquan5492 in the event he lost his case, that doesnt mean amber would win the counter suit, they would have to prove malice, that he beat her, and that he ruined her career. Which have all be proven untrue so far
@Blogger Several witnesses on Johnny’s team are obviously biased. The difference is Heard can’t get a sane person to agree to put their name on their side
@Blogger The logic that Johnny’s alleged abuse would somehow justify Amber’s more severe verbal and physical abuse goes both ways. Whoever is the physical abuser is the criminal. The disgustingly politicized courts and judges of heavily liberal cities, who refused the admittance of relevant evidence, are a joke. This trial has shown how courts can manipulate the facts through the admittance of certain evidence
@Blogger This case has nothing to do with proving or disproving domestic abuse. This case is only about whether AH defamed JD, the domestic abuse info in the case is only there to help prove defamation. This trial is not a DA trial, it is a Defamation trial!
This man is a fucking legend and has literally destroyed everything Dr golem said. This is professionalism at it's absolute finest. Well done to you sir
Has anyone noticed how Johnny Depp looks at this man in total respect? He is literally into all that this man has done.......taking in every word, total respect.
Absolutely. That is the first thing I noticed. Johnny's daughter spent time in the hospital when she was young so I would imagine he was very appreciative of this expert's time spent helping children and their parents in the hospital.
When you're genuinely annoyed that the opposition interrupted the guy who was talking, not because you're rooting against them, but we're actively interested in what they had to say you know the person speaking is good
I love how they called one of the best child psychologists in the country. So the jury gets to hear a doctor that does amazing work with children after hearing that Amber never paid the donation to a Children’s hospital. They are playing chess while Ambers are playing checkers
Not only is this man a well read, astute expert in his field, he was well spoken, and he was not vindictive. This man loves his career and wants to defend it from quacks like Dr. Smeagol. I could listen to this man speak all day.
That's the thing about this guy, he's not even there to defend Johnny really, he's not on anyone's side objectively. He's mostly just there to point out that clown from the day before was speaking out of his ass while claiming professional insight.
That's the only thing Johnny's legal team needs from this expert, to show the jury that Amber's witness and experts are all of the same - their testimonies are all unreliable
This dude is a f*cking Saint. The work he does brings so much relief to children and grieving parents. What a beautiful person and a wonderful career. 👏 👏 👏
I saw the same relief on Johnny's face. You would just sit there and start doubting yourself! I watched Johnny listen very intently as the cogs turned in his head. Happy for Johnny!
So I wanted to let you know, this man kept a smile on his face because with his job, it becomes a habit when working with kids because it keeps them at ease.
Dr. Curry is probably going to be the very last witness. Thats how well they did in hiring, they saved the legend goddess to say the final words before closing arguments. She will probably be questioned by camille Vasquez. Optics & jury gold. Charm/skill everyone into the proper opinion.
This Doctor wasn't there to promote either party. He was all about truth and out of respect for his industry, holding things to the highest of standards. Respect👊🏼
Yeah and He talks a lot about narcicistic behavior yet he shows traits of the said disorder. AmIright?🤣 and also he looks like an evil doctor in the movies that manipulates you into doing bad things. Almost close to being the likes of Hannibal Lecter. 😱 (talking about the doctor who testified on behalf of amber)
Jonny Depp's guild of wizards is unmatched. From twitter wizards to mind wizards to math wizards. Whereas Amber heard has a bunch of 2nd year acolytes that never finished wizarding school.
This is my favorite video yet, this legend just comes in and basically says "not only did that "expert" psychiatrist violate a fundamental rule of the profession but so did many of Heard's "expert" doctors." Slayed.
Ive already watched the live version but still coming back to watch this Professor’s testimony. Love his explanation and the way he delivered info & knowledges. His students are sooooo lucky. I want to join his lectures
There is a golden rule in communication that Pascal wrote but never emphasized enough by cultures. "If I had more time, I'd write a shorter letter." More wisdom you get, more simple the explanation to understand. Spiegel blurts an entire thesis without subject of focus.
I'm not in psychiatry, but this guy inspires more confidence in the first 5 minutes than the other guy did in his entire testimony. The contrast in professionalism is staggering.
Literally everyone who’s testified for AH have ruined their careers!!! She’s like a poisoned chalice. Love how calm and level headed this guy is! It’s like the adults have been in charge today 😊
It seems they are all complete nutjobs who don’t have much a career to begin with. The witness from yesterday testified that she didn’t currently have any clients. Only Dawn Hughes has a single accomplishment close to what all of Depp’s witnesses have. She made a career destroying men’s lives with incredibly biased “expert” testimony that doesn’t even believe that men can ever be victims of women
To see somone who is an actual, real expert in their field and has dedicated their lives to it and knows their subject endlessly, makes my eyes water. Listening to competence nowadays feels like best kind of holiday. Speaks a lot about how much BS we are bombarded with every single day.
I keep having my psych 101 professor’s voice in my head billowing “correlation is not causation” - as he said every week. Psych 101. And that one guy seriously didn’t understand it. He forgot one of the most basic principles of psychology/psychiatry.
I really like listening to this expert. He's so polite and really easy to understand, especially compared to the weird and confusing Dr. Spiegel! I'd love to listen to him some more, as what he spoke about was really interesting.
And he speaks with such reverence about what he does too. He and Dr. Curry, I really enjoyed watching them on the stand, and rewatching them is such good feels 😊
Aye his mannerisms are so perfect for treating seriously ill children, and the parents, family members, struggling with it.. he is a wonderful representative for the profession.
This guy is like Gandalf after he was resurrected or something. He's like the Dumbledore of the psychiatric world. And his voice is so calm and soothing. He never gets upset or lashes out and is very knowledgeable. He knows why he's here and he's very confident in his skill.
The difference between the two of these guys is astounding. The level of professionalism this man has is near perfection, and he knows exactly what he is talking about. I’m so glad he agreed to this because he just wiped the stain that other man put on his profession.
I have done and administered the MMSE test mentioned at 34:05, it is administered to people with memory problems, like Alzheimer's and such. The three word question thing, is just ONE of the 10 or 11 questions in the test, if you fail it you would lose just 3 points in total out of 30 points. It is TOTALLY NORMAL for ordinary people to fail in one or two of the questions in that test, wholly or partially simply due to anxiety or whatever. Especially when its the three word question that also personally tripped me up when the test was done to myself during my education. I could not remember all the three words either, since its kind of a clever way the test does it on you. It is not repeating the three words, its remembering three words in correct order further down the line in the test after you think that question has been done and dusted, you are suddenly forced to recall something you might not considered important a moment ago. Its a gotcha moment in the test and it shows NOTHING as standalone if failed! If the rest of the questions are fine, it is worth considering only when subject starts having problems with large parts of rest of the questions too.
That Dr.Spiegel guy was CLEARLY meant as a damn trap for Depp. The biggest problem with him is that he is not some neutral court appointed psychiatrist, he is a psychiatrist appointed by Amber Heard who is getting paid by her! How nobody would see that as anything as attempt to legitimize smearing Depp's character is a fool or a liar.
@@thestraightroad305 Sure, np. Yea it has questions such as: What is the name of the location you are in now (like town or city)? What is the date today? Who is the current president? What floor you are on now? Can you draw this pattern by using only straight lines and without raising the pen (like a cube or something similar iirc)? After the first few questions, the interviewer suddenly says (according to the test) to memorize these 3 (short) words: like "dinner-laughing-yellow" or something similar, i don't have them memorized). Then the test continues for like 5 or 6 questions and among the few last questions the test goes, by the way: Can you repeat the three random words you were supposed to memorize a while ago? It is really dishonest not telling that it is completely normal for people to fail like 1-3 of these questions AND even if more questions are failed, the correct medical advice is to run MORE memory tests before drawing ANY conclusions, especially when this would be the very first time the subject got a such a test administered to him and does not have any previous memory diagnosis. Obviously it goes without saying that the subject also needs to be 100% sober for this test even to be considered.
Wow that is fascinating. What a complex field. I can see how someone who really wants to misrepresent evidence can make a wilderness out of this by leaving pieces out and subtly twisting things. It is obvious how and why the true expert wanted to speak truth into this situation and restore the integrity of his profession.
plus Johnny was up all night the day before and may or may not have been under the influence of alcohol and drugs, before doing the actual test, also you could feel pressured during those 5 minutes to remember those words and pressure can make you nervous. I often forget things quickly so i repeat them to myself out loud for a 30s to a minute
objected bcoz their trying to protect their witness' credibility which is now.. well .. non existent. in comparison to this awesome Dr who really is actually the right bearer of the word "expert".
The Goldwater rule is so important to both politics and psychology that not only is it covered in American history and early psych courses, but even the ethics 101 class I took covered it.The idea that anyone in the field would not know it is actually shocking.
Yes goldwater is important. Because previously you was faster in a psychiatry ,without that you see a psychiatrist.All you had to do was say something about you and the psychiatrist put you in a psychiatric ward.
23:46 yes. This exact thing happens with Dr. Spiegel from yesterday. He had a client who was suicidal, the family reached out for help and he never respomded, and the client committed suicide. So interesting that he brought that up.
This guy is here to defend his profession. From the wrong information given by Amber's soo called experts. He's not biased at all. He doesn't care about the trial. He just doesn't want the profession to be made a mockery of.
The other Psychiatrist went into this guys' kitchen and, with lack of a better analogy, took a shit. Too bad he didn't realise the guy was an Archwizard...
You nailed it with school shootings. The media coverage is making other suicidal nut jobs think it's their ticket to fame and immortality. I respect your decision to report it without giving attention to the perpetrator.
Its why here in Scandinavia, *especially* in Norway, why we don't really use the name of the July 22nd terrorist because he wanted his name out there. I think its been quite well documented for a very long time now that we shouldn't be showing faces names of school shooters, its sad that the media haven't caught up
@@nettieforce1 99% of mass shootings happen in gun free zones. Funny how that works isn't it. You want more of the populace armed to stop mass shootings, not less.
@@DarthSidianit’s amazing how some Americans see universal healthcare as something diabolical and a attack on their freedom yet they are perfectly fine with sending their children into a building with armed people in it just because they don’t want stricter laws that would prevent kids buying assault rifles at Walmart.
This man knows exactly what he's talking about. I enjoyed listening too him. He's very informative about different aspects of personalities. I sure hope AH's team was listening to a REAL authentic Doctor. He's simply amazing!!
For sure, I can definitely see why he is a lecturer, and a likely well liked one at that. Easy to listen too, and engaging in the way he talks about his field. Really wish that more lectures and professors have both these traits.
Turd's psychiatrists: I'm going to diagnose Johnny without seeing or talking to him. Depp's psychiatrists: talk to both Johnny and amber before providing any sort of diagnoses
Funny thing is this is the 2nd time it has happened. With Dr. Curry and that other women. Dr. Curry took both sides while the other psychologist didn't.
@@SailorYue Dr. Curry didn’t evaluate Depp. She was hired to evaluate Ms. Heard. She “talked to” Depp only in the sense that she spoke to him simply because she had to do her initial meeting with Depp’s team at Depp’s house (which is very uncommon but made sense here bc his celebrity rendered him pretty much homebound). She didn’t do a clinical evaluation of him though. No one did
@@aliioana8586 the point still stands that Dr quackinsmirtz insisted Johnny had all these things wrong with him and never met with him once. He watched a few of his excentric performances and twisted a rumor about Johnny and how he uses an earbud (to play music so he can focus while acting) conflating it with how Marlon Brando used an earpiece cuz he could never memorize his lines
This is crazy.... I actually understand what this expert witness is saying, compared to all of AH's "expert" witnesses.... It's almost as if he is an ACTUAL expert in the field.... and not just being paid to do a job.
Her "expert" was a homeless man from Central Park. They bathed him, gave him a suit and $100 buck to come there and say some shit and leave. No real expert in any field will come and bomb their own career like he did.
This man spent his life getting educated while the rest of us just sat back and had a glass of wine and whatever else. Look how it paid off for him. I am so impressed
This absolute gentleman of a Dr, so professional, so calm, so knowledgeable. The complete opposite of the angry, argumentative pompous fool that amber had up there. A mega psychiatrist!
TLDR, psychiatrist is LITERALLY out here doing God's work helping children with serious and various medical problems throughout treatment. At the same time counseling the parents of said children to cope with the trauma they're experiencing. Amber Heard and her team should feel like shit for taking hours out of his day, keeping him from REAL patients, to prove that AH is a POS.
He is a rare gift to humanity. Intelligent, compassionate, principled, and thoughtful. Even among the best psychiatrists and doctors, it is all too common for the parents of ill children to be neglected
This Dr is expressing disgust towards unethical & unprofessional behaviors from any given licensed “psychiatrist” He is so knowledgeable, I felt I was in one of his University psychiatry & behavioral science classes
I would pay to listen to this man speak on any subject of his choosing. Am I the only person who felt that AHs team didn't want people to understand the ethical rules, why they were established, why they work, and how they are supposed to be applied?
@@mariotibbrine1 I would have to agree with you lol. I feel like he could convince much of the population that what he is saying is correct, purely based on his way of speech.
Thank God for a real Dr. that shows compassion to his patients. I highly relate as a parent with a son that has autism and several delays plus adhd. It is very hard not receiving support from professionals it can be emotionally draining not knowing how to help your child. 💔
I can relate, it took 5 years to get a diagnosis of autism for my daughter, passed from pillar to post. Got there in the end but she leave school in a year
My son is non verbal autistic and ADHD it's really hard it's not easy. I know after my boys were in nicu I struggled for a long time mentally in the UK the care isn't good for parents x
My son is 5 years old autistic non verbal and ADHD u and I agree it can get very emotionally draining not knowing how to help him and wishing I could take it away
@@rachelmeadows6191 totally get you huni my little one is 8 now and in a sen school which makes a big difference to him but he's such a loving little boy although he can struggle with his emotions etc. If you want to talk let me know and il find a way to send you my Facebook or something x
It's nice to see an actual EXPERT in psychiatry, not the lunatic that was on the stand the other day. We get to hear a professional in his field that answered each question in a clear, even tone, and kept on point with his answers. Hell, "doctor" Speigel couldn't be bothered to comb his hair, how could the defense think he was an expert?
This guy basically did on average 2 manuscripts, a book chapter & almost 2 depositions every year for his whole career on top of all his clinical & medical work
It's funny how her experts are any combination of sleazy, unethical or crazy while JD's are always extremely calm and professional. Even the Hollywood lawyer! You know something is wrong when a Hollywood lawyer looks better than any experts on the other side
This was so satisfying to see someone with this many accolades call the previous psych out for being unethical. The previous guy's mental gymnastics and defensiveness were huge red flags.
The jaw dropping moment yesterday when the goon said JD was narcissistic because he thought AH wanted his money. That was reality not narcissism. My cat would know that
Not only is this guy an actual expert with a ton of accolades, but he also teaches psychology. Could not have chosen a better person to explain this stuff to the laymen in the audience. It's almost like you can get better expert witnesses when you're actually telling the truth.
Yeah, don't confuse the 2, psychiatrists and psychologists hate each other. Look up APA (American Psychiatric Association) vs APA (American Psychological Association), they're like children 🤣
Psychiatrist= requires a doctorate, they are physicians, can prescribe medicines and do more study related work with use of statistics and analysis, usually not trained in psychotherapy. Psychologist= does not require a doctorate, trained in at least one form of psychotherapy, usually can't prescribe medicines but can in certain jurisdictions if they go through training, trained in administration of diagnostic testing and the analysis and interpretation of said tests. There's a ton of overlap, but psychiatrist deal with more of the physical brain while psychologists deal more with the effects of the brain.
This man is the real deal. Obviously, Very educated and extremely knowledgeable in his specific field of expertise and the countless branches off that tree. I as well feel I learned a lot from listening to him. I specifically took note that he is not defensive or argumentative. He does not have to be.
I'm glad we here in NZ were blessed to have Dr. Shaw among us for a time. He expressed how unfortunate Spiegel's actions were and how it will affect practitioners in his field, but he never degraded the man. He never outrightly condemned Spiegel, this he left open for the jury to decide. Dr. Shaw is the kind of doctor I'm glad we have in this crazy world ❤️
Been loving the judge for this whole trial but she gave WAY too much leeway to AHs team here with respect to objections. I understand most of court proceedings comes down to how stuff is worded and such, but not allowing him to continue his examples under the grounds that he “proved his point and already did that”? That was goofy as hell
I read somewhere else that speculates the judge being lenient with AH to basically cancel any attempts for AH team to plead judge bias. She lets them short victories in exchange for less longterm gain after the trial.
I've been a fan of this judge throughout this trial despite the fact I feel she gave amber heards lawyers too much leeway. But sustaining an objection to the doctor describing a psychiatric test is absolutely ridiculous. Maybe it was because he was using a metaphor but even then, I don't see how a psychiatric expert can't try to explain a complex concept in layman's terms. I think she was completely wrong about this one. I also don't understand why he couldn't comment on the medical records while spiegel was allowed to use it in his testimony. It's absolutely ridiculous, at the least they should have been allowed to lay the foundation by referring to the records and what they say.
I couldn’t agree more. Yet she let Sméagol go on outrageous tangents that went nowhere for what felt like hours, again felt as if nothing was said and make wild accusations about Depp.
@@ichigokage That is actually a good thing IMO. Since all it did was waste their time. Remember, there's a time bank and Johnny's team still has a LOT of juice in it while Amber's team is basically out of gas.
ehh, I saw nothing wrong...he compared a test to taking a person's temperature. alot of what happens in a court room revolves around language. you say the wrong thing and good lawyers find a way to stop the line of questions. also I'm pretty sure the judge let the other "expert" just dig a hole for himself and amber
@@caroo367 he didn't have to finish the simile for the jury to get what he was saying imo, the objection came late enough for them to fill in the gaps if they were paying attention
Johnny Depp is the very antithesis of a narcissist. He does NOT want attention from others. His fame does not feed his ego, quite the opposite. He is also genuinely caring and compassionate toward others. He gives generously to others. "Jealousy" or concern for the woman he loves and her reputation? Johnny is probably the least narcissistic person in that courtroom.
I might get shout at for saying this, but, JD really should see this guy after then trial. This is a very good and caring psychiatrist, and those are hard to find, with all the ordeal that he has been through it is "imperative" for a person to help you and guide you through all the drama. Wish all the best for JD's and his kids.
I don't see why anyone would have a go at you for your opinion, it's a good one 👌. He should seek professional help and this guy would be great, I wish he was my Dr. I noticed Johnny took a lot of interest in what he was saying, maybe he will see him after the trial?
Ur 100%,right about Dr Sure.,if ur serious about seeking help from a caring n understanding psychedelic doc. ON the other hand,if u just 1a F-around and have a laugh,seek Dr Siegel(Evil Gargelmel-smurf)for 1 session Just sitting looking at his ugly,fish lips face,and his ridiculous insane explanation,wood have u roll,wood be funny enuff for a laugh🤪
Well said.100% he has to go to this guy and I would go ahead and suggest AH should also go so she can live a better life. We are all humans and we make mistakes. Learn get help and move on !
I worked in mental health for over 10 years, and this might be the first guy anyone has put on the stand who comes off like a real psychiatrist or psychologist who takes their job seriously. He’s like one of the doctors who studied LSD in the 50s and 60s in Saskatchewan trying to find a cure for alcoholism. Seems like a good shrink.
Surprised you would use the word "shrink" being someone who worked in the field for 10 years. I've been in the field for 7 years myself and that term seems a bit outdated and almost hollywood-ized, if you will.
@@MrPeabody67 the studies went well. I cant point out papers right now but as far as im aware there are practices that already use lsd and psilocybin in therapy. It lowers the ego and allows the patient to be far more open which is obviously beneficial when talking about anything traumatic. Johns Hopkins University have published a lot about it. Im sure they have youtube videos about it too.
@@chesneymigl4538 I dont know, The Center for Psychedelic Research and Therapy at Dell Medical School at The University of Texas might be able to help you find somewhere if you can contact someone there.
The fact that this uber-prepared expert with a brutal amount of knowledge gets objected every time he is about to explain in great and precise detail just WHY the previous evaluations of Dr.Schmeagol were wrong, and that objection is actually sustained, just explains how much unable the judiciary can be to process very deep, specialized amounts of information.
To be fair, it might not even hurt Depp's side that much since his experts really show they're experts through their in-depth explanations and clear and concise reasoning, but at the same time, that takes up a lot of time so perhaps AH's lawyers are doing them a solid by allowing them to move on and have more time for other things since the expert has already made their points more clearly than anyone on AH's side.
To be fair, there are times where he did go beyond the scope of the question, although I wanted him to keep going, because he is so interesting and calm. Also, I feel like the judge has done a pretty good job so far at being unbiased. Also I think it gives an opportunity to depp's team to reframe their questions and dig in
@@zoobeeda yup I agree. Sometimes it was just too much detail and at some points it just took up too much of the court's time, even though its very interesting. at the end of the day its a trial, not a lecture though after seeing this I'd love to attend one of his lectures if he gives any lol
I disagree on the judiciary part. In all honesty, they likely know of this information, either because it was testified before, they found out of own volition, they were required to by a professor who so happens to emphasize on psychology as well, or just...common sense. And by common sense, I meant that while his information is insightful, it's insightful when we're trying to learn psychology, not when we're participating in a court case that's running out of time. The room's about law, not necessarily psychology.
The things Rottenborn is objecting to (when the expert was comparing jealously and envy, when he likened the test to taking someone's temperature) are literally things experts are taught to do in order to make the information more digestible and relatable to the jury. They're taught to use common examples in order to help the jury understand concepts they're unfamiliar with. Essentially, Rottenborn doesn't want the jury to understand the processes that are being described. Or, in Asmon's words, "Objection: they're using facts, Your Honor, and it makes my client look bad."
Lawyer: "Dr. Shaw what is your current position/do/books you've written/lecture given/association you're in/currently working at?" Dr. Shaw: "Everything possible and 50x deposition/peer reviewed medical findings/multiple books written" Dr. Spiegel: *Surprised Pikachu face* The difference is insane. Dr. Shaw makes you feel like he is a real psychiatrist you can trust, he is polite, nice and generally just gives out an aura of "Wow, this guy is a doctor and he is professional" Dr. Speigel is.......... interesting.
Spiegel + the guy AH's team brought for social media analysis both look like THE stereotypical DEEP STATE person you'd imagine. Super socially awkward, odd posture, in a really generic suit/tie, old with gray/white weird aloof hair.
I love how the single most credentialed expert during this trial gets an objection! Lol. I missed Dr. Smeagle yesterday, so need to go back and watch that debaucle!!
Thanks for continuing to share the JD and AH trial with us. I’ve been enjoying all your side commentary. I look forward to catching up with your stream at the end of my work day in SF, CA
I could listen to this man talk all day, the way he explains things makes me actually understand everything he says and is so interesting. What a witness!
It's so refreshing and enlightening when a REAL expert witness is called to the stand. There's no posturing or self entitlement attitude that we, lay persons, have to contend with.
I like how the first series of questions is just about how extensive his resume is, how involved he is, how long he's been in his field, and how credible he is as an expert witness. Where are the accomplishments of ANY of Amber's witnesses beyond the, "My opinion is IMPORTANT," attitude that they all seem to carry around and the amount of money they're making just by being involved in the trial?
It's mindblowing. In comparison to these ACTUAL experts, her experts clearly didn't even do basic research on the matters they felt qualified to give 'expert' opinions on. It makes me wonder if anyone can just fake their way into any industry of their choice and make a living off of giving 'expert' testimonies that pay 500 an hour.
Heard's "experts" did give admirable backgrounds and credentials. The problem is they all wound up looking like clowns because they manipulated information and they were picked apart easily. They were seen through by average people without college education. The lies are shattering Heard and her "experts."
I'm a woman and I wish I was more like this man...I mean his calm demeanor. I'm a nervous person from past childhood trauma. I wish so much that I could be like this.
The difference between Depp's experts and Hurd's "experts" is staggering. A Lawyer could learn to properly screen their experts from this trial. A training program if you will. Mind boggling the difference in class and education betwixt the two.
Don't think they had much of a choice. They have nothing to go on, so they probably had to scrape the bottom of the barrel to get anyone to say anything they could use.
Your take on the media with school shooters is spot on. Thank you Asmongold. I hope those killed in school shootings, as well as their families, find peace.
Absolutely. The terrible system and media take no credit for what happens, and then try to bash us over the head wanting our laws to be more like Chicago or Detroit in order to "stop shootings". How about they stop giving shooters fame and we see what happens instead? On top of that, the public school system is notoriously bad at actually taking care of kids / etc, and a lot of times these people get reported on continuously with nothing actually done about it. It's our system failing in the first place, and they think it'll be fixed by depending even more on the system. The only thing it'd change is disarming the people who are the ones we want to be armed. There are so many cases of crimes being stopped because the right people were armed and ready, and they NEVER discuss that. It's actually an insane amount of crimes prevented because people have weapons to protect themselves and others. Anyone who is curious about it, I'd definitely recommend researching into it, because when I saw the numbers for myself I was shocked. Personally, I always prefer the crime channels that talk about the VICTIMS and their stories over people who go on and on about the killers. We should scrub the killers' names and photos from history - it's probably the one time I'd be okay with censorship. Maybe keep that information somewhere for reference or something, for research purposes for people actually in those fields, but don't publicize it all over the place.
Can we all just appreciate how much this guy seems like a genuine kind and caring soul. It takes someone with a tough crust and a good heart to be strong enough to help guide children through the mental side of the worst things they may face in life.
To touch on what the doctor was saying about the difference between envy and jealousy, which is an important distinction, especially when it comes to a clinical diagnosis: Envy is a strong - often pathological - desire for what someone else has that you do not, whereas jealousy is being overly protective of what you have due to fear it will be taken from you.
Now here's a dedicated layman ...35 yr career with so many fine works he has impressed me greatly...go ahead with yourself sir you are a shining light in your hard life's work...you love your work and it shows...ty for explaining in terms we understand.. thanks for working with my favorite, sick children.. bless you and them...
He as kept himself involved and moved forward with changes in his field. Spiegal seems to have kept himself in work with his outdated learning.Both being experts and can make a great impact on patients is scary
Is this the raid boss psychiatrist? "Have you published anything through the APA?" "All of them, actually. I've also written over 70 books and a college textbook that's on its second edition." Lmao
The pledge did have a time limit according to the divorce agreement. The $3.5 million was never to be dragged out. Amber was to DONATE the money as soon as she received the $7 million from JD. Let’s be real. Amber never intended to donate $7 million.
But but but…she pledged to do it ,which means absolutely nothing. Love all the jokes going around about “pledging” to pay their electrical bill and now their lights are out. And so on.They should’ve stayed harder on the fact she had 13 months to make those donations and didn’t. She got caught up in the moment with a reporter and now is stuck in her lies. I’m going to go fill up my jeep with gas I’m gonna pledge to pay them and takeoff see how it works out for me.
I absolutely love this witness, he knows what he is talking about and he can relay his knowledge and professional opinions on a somewhat tricky subject *psychiatry* in a way that everyone in the room and everyone that is watching can digest easily and understand. Usually you find experts using big exaggerated words, and he is very very well spoken with out having to use huge words or knowledge bravado on his profession... great witness!
Holy crap, what a massive difference between JD's psychiatrist witness and amber's. This psychiatrist is on master level in his field. And he speaks concisely, clear and professional. Well, he is a professor after all.
That pledge thing is garbage. She said on tv "I wanted nothing", tilting her nose up as if she was the second coming of mother teresa and all have to kneel before her generosity. If she didn't want it she should have donated all of it at onece, as fast as possible, so the hospital could actualy use that mony, instead of waiting. That's how you help people. If you see someone dying from thirst, you don't give them one drop of water, and Pledge the rest of the water, and say I'll give it to you in installment with each one being 1 year apart.
It’s worth noting that, though she said she wanted “nothing”, her initial divorce demands included a Range Rover (with Johnny continuing to make the payments), 3 penthouses (with Johnny continuing. to pay rent and/or mortgages), and numerous other things.
@@quillboy34 agreed completely. She had been fighting for something, not nothing, since breaking up with JD. As much as possible in fact. As you said, and as the court documents and the "ransom" letter states. Provide all this stuff (vehicles, houses, bills, money) or else...
All the Judge's sustained objections from amber's team was for me- being the reason she sustained it was the Psychiatrist was literally starting to talk as if he was teaching in a lecture, and it was really straying away from the scope of the case but it was really intresting like maaan- i felt like i was learning from him just speaking there
@@ichigokage yeaahhh, the only reason i could come up with that is really... the Judge just let that man ramble on for the sake of having a statement and see where it was going to be leading, cause none of what the dude said had true and factual basis from an 'Expert' Psychiatrist point of view,,, while this actual Expert Psychiatrist that stated and actually acted professionally and shared his thoughts in the same manner, which is what a psychiatrist should act- has too much truth and facts to say, really he didn't need to start expanding out the scope of the case. If my explanation made sense.
@@ichigokage bear in mind, that JD’s team chose not to object most of the time to let him ramble and dig himself a hole. Never interrupt your opponent when they are making a mistake.
I hope when this court case ends Johnny can escape from the public eye for a while and go to a tranquil retreat somewhere and create some amazing artwork that will heal his soul, he is looking pretty beaten emotionally and spiritually,he's certainly been put through the wringer,
So they can bust JD in the kitchen video but can’t bust Amber for secretly recording a person without his consent violating his privacy?? What a double standard!!
This doctor is the real deal, unlike the 'doctor' that was up there yesterday This guy is so intelligent, articulate, Love it!! He is an expert in his field (and probably other fields too) Damn smart fella! How weird though for the court to take a break in the middle of the doctor's testimony.
Tbf a judge is only human too, they can not go like "Hey listen I really really gotta use the bathroom real quick just excuse me for a second I´ll brb". Or something similar you know. So I guess it´s fair to just go like "Listen it´s breaktime, so we gonna take a break"
1:19 Johnny’s reaction to him stuttering while saying he works with children who have severe medical conditions says it all He recognized there was some trauma behind that stutter and he sympathized and gave him his full attention because he’s been there He constantly visited sick children I work with sick children as well it’s the hardest job in the world when it comes to mental stress but if you can make a difference for the little ones it’s worth the struggles
@@ImAnOcean did you have a mega pint before deciding to make your asinine comment ? You can literally watch him look up and give the doctor his attention it’s called body language and it doesn’t take a college degree to recognize it
This Doctor is the most laid back, Confidence oozing, Down to earth , Knowledgeable and Professional person i have seen during this travesty perpetrated against Mr Depp..
When someone can explain something it doesn’t mean they understand as you can see from AH experts, JD experts are constantly showing how much knowledge and experience they actually have.
This guy didn't care about the trial. He was there to defend his profession against the unethical and scientifically questionable testimony and practices of the discount Dr Doofenshmirtz impostor who testified yesterday. He did a great job too. The best way to discredit some "expert" is to bring on an actual expert with more publications than most people have traffic tickets, who tells the "expert" that they are an idiot.
"discount Dr.Doofenshmirtz impostor" that's pretty good holy shit
@@yllom1035 when i read that i cackled tbh
I have to re-read the Dr Doofenshmirtz part. Heinz was saner and better than that Smeagol guy
Christ Jesus, you said, “…discount Dr. Doofenshmirtz imposter…” LOL
Do most people have many traffic tickets? I don't have any, and I've been driving for over a decade.
Yesterday we saw how a psychiatrist should NOT be, today we saw and heard how a true professional who likely cares about patients and helps sounds. As someone who has seen many and had the bad and the good, I’ve learned to pick up the differences.
Would def prefer a person like this over the Crypt Keeper.
NOT THE CRYPT KEEPER
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Crypt Keeper 😆😆😆
Dude😂😂😂
Dr Doofenshmirtz
I literally feel like i learned something while listening to him talk. This man is truly an expert in his field.
@@Str8Maddeness exactly
And hes posh british which is +1000 to speech
@@skraminc yeah, this man put all his stats into intelligence.
@@dumas6023 hes almost a new class of stealth bard. This dude sings calm into you with his composure.
@@skraminc he's from NZ.
Johnny Depp Experts:: "I have 30+ years of experience in the filed, wrote 50+books"
Amber Heard Experts: "I have a diploma laying around somewhere i swear and also i really need the money"
The differences between their experts is EMBARRASSING!
@@chynawyatt4068 she’s broke, she can only afford frauds. This expert for JD is well-spoken AND has great bone structure, top tier.
AH lies again. She left home at 16 and went LA. Her first job was stripping at nights for tips.
And board certified. Dont forget that. 🙄
😅😅😅
Finally a specialist who is so pleasant to listen to. He's delivering a lot of consistent information, very calmly, looks like a class at college for sure
Dr. Curry hits those criteria as well.
Enough about the muffins already 🙄 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Elaine just going on and on about Dr Currys husband.
I can't believe we're getting free lectures from a defamation trial, but I ain't complaining. It's a free Stanford professor's lecture!
I’m going to be annoying for a second. For future reference…
Rule of thumb: Use “a” before a consonant sound, & “an” before a vowel sound. 😘
@@Name-oz4lq thanks for the advice, English is not my first language and I really appreciate tips☺👍
This is what you call a real expert.
Calm, knowledgable, respectful, know and remember literally everything and every detail in his reviews of depositions, evidences. Every single witnesses from Depp's side is like this, that should tell you something.
Such a big difference from Dr. Smeagul.
I love the reference...my precious.🙂
Lmao
@@MelbourneArchviz It is entirely possible but he had already won the court of public opinion. His career will be revived no matter the outcome of this trial. But it's still a bummer that if AH won, even tho her career will go down the drain, she still have the money from the counter-suit.
@@sonquan5492 in the event he lost his case, that doesnt mean amber would win the counter suit, they would have to prove malice, that he beat her, and that he ruined her career. Which have all be proven untrue so far
Smeargal
This guy is not bias. He is a pro. A true expert. Not a paid lackey
This guy is like a real "Sheldon Cooper"
@Blogger
Several witnesses on Johnny’s team are obviously biased.
The difference is Heard can’t get a sane person to agree to put their name on their side
This psychiatrist is a Psychiatrist Savant💯💯👍😁🐨🦘🙃
@Blogger
The logic that Johnny’s alleged abuse would somehow justify Amber’s more severe verbal and physical abuse goes both ways.
Whoever is the physical abuser is the criminal.
The disgustingly politicized courts and judges of heavily liberal cities, who refused the admittance of relevant evidence, are a joke.
This trial has shown how courts can manipulate the facts through the admittance of certain evidence
@Blogger This case has nothing to do with proving or disproving domestic abuse. This case is only about whether AH defamed JD, the domestic abuse info in the case is only there to help prove defamation. This trial is not a DA trial, it is a Defamation trial!
This man is a fucking legend and has literally destroyed everything Dr golem said. This is professionalism at it's absolute finest. Well done to you sir
Hey tho Dr. Gollem did find the precious though. He ran out a ton of time and got paid a whole bunch. Didn't help anyone at all but still.
Hahaha dr Golem
“Dr. Golem” BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH SO RIGHT!!
@@booleah6357 the precious
@Tonya Harmon was power
Has anyone noticed how Johnny Depp looks at this man in total respect? He is literally into all that this man has done.......taking in every word, total respect.
Yes!!!
Definitely questioning his sexuality...
I mean god I know I am.
Absolutely. That is the first thing I noticed. Johnny's daughter spent time in the hospital when she was young so I would imagine he was very appreciative of this expert's time spent helping children and their parents in the hospital.
When you're genuinely annoyed that the opposition interrupted the guy who was talking, not because you're rooting against them, but we're actively interested in what they had to say you know the person speaking is good
I love how they called one of the best child psychologists in the country. So the jury gets to hear a doctor that does amazing work with children after hearing that Amber never paid the donation to a Children’s hospital. They are playing chess while Ambers are playing checkers
Ambers lawyers are playing chutes and ladders. They even hit that one big slide that throws you back to the start.
Watching amber's team is like watching that one person at the D&D table who never rolls above a 7.
@@razzamatronic9882 always rolls crit fails more like lol
@@booleah6357 thanks for making me burst out laughing out loud!
😂😂😂
Not only is this man a well read, astute expert in his field, he was well spoken, and he was not vindictive. This man loves his career and wants to defend it from quacks like Dr. Smeagol. I could listen to this man speak all day.
Guy reminded me of smeagol and a muppet at one point 😆
The Dr. Smeagol is S E N D I N G M E im too high for that holy shit i legitimately almost pissed myself
Man couldn't stop saying um. I don't think that constitutes as well spoken.
@@potatoe4221 ..thanks i can't un-listen now 😆😆
@@potatoe4221
Yeah you're right. He was definitely a dumbass because he said "Um"
That's the thing about this guy, he's not even there to defend Johnny really, he's not on anyone's side objectively. He's mostly just there to point out that clown from the day before was speaking out of his ass while claiming professional insight.
That's the only thing Johnny's legal team needs from this expert, to show the jury that Amber's witness and experts are all of the same - their testimonies are all unreliable
He's there to defend the psychiatric professionals integrity and also giving us some lesson on psychiatry
the difference between an expert and an ""expert""
sometimes you'll find expert witnesses like this, but other times you have to pay them and coach them to say what you want
@@plokko1 you mean an expert and the expert
This dude is a f*cking Saint. The work he does brings so much relief to children and grieving parents. What a beautiful person and a wonderful career. 👏 👏 👏
I saw the same relief on Johnny's face. You would just sit there and start doubting yourself! I watched Johnny listen very intently as the cogs turned in his head. Happy for Johnny!
What a hard job that must be too
@@koncifer2235Hard, but that's gotta be rewarding as fuck. To be able to go home and just be like "I'm a goddamn superhero."
So I wanted to let you know, this man kept a smile on his face because with his job, it becomes a habit when working with kids because it keeps them at ease.
Love that !!
The difference between an expert and someone hired by Amber turd’s team is so clear
AH's team need to see the Wizard , they don't have a brain.All of them together still don't have a brain.
AMBER TEAM AND FOLLOWERS ON CAMRA HAVE SOMETHING IN COMMEN, THEIR ALL MANIPULATORS AND WORK AROUND THE QUESTIONS AND LOOK AT THE JURRY!
Dr. Curry is probably going to be the very last witness. Thats how well they did in hiring, they saved the legend goddess to say the final words before closing arguments. She will probably be questioned by camille Vasquez. Optics & jury gold. Charm/skill everyone into the proper opinion.
This is because no decent expert would want to represent A.Turd. So all she has are flakes and hacks. Dodgy people to represent a dodgy person.
well you don’t have that much choice if you need ppl to bend the truth into questionable story’s.
This Doctor wasn't there to promote either party. He was all about truth and out of respect for his industry, holding things to the highest of standards. Respect👊🏼
I found it very enjoyable to see him discredit and dismantle the clown from yesterday, Spiegel
It would be an honor to be treated by this doctor...it would be a nightmare to be treated by the doctor who testified yesterday (he was terrifying)
Lol you dont want some lunatic yelling at you about how hes cool with breaking rules of ethics and telling you that youre wrong at every turn?
Actually the Dr. yesterday act like a patient in mental institution not a doctor..He looks creepy..
Everything will be alright Meredith. Just relax. 🐖
He sounds pleasent
Yeah and He talks a lot about narcicistic behavior yet he shows traits of the said disorder. AmIright?🤣 and also he looks like an evil doctor in the movies that manipulates you into doing bad things. Almost close to being the likes of Hannibal Lecter. 😱 (talking about the doctor who testified on behalf of amber)
Jonny Depp's guild of wizards is unmatched. From twitter wizards to mind wizards to math wizards. Whereas Amber heard has a bunch of 2nd year acolytes that never finished wizarding school.
I'd say the guy in this clip is an Archmage
Good Analogy
I cannot even comprehend how Amber and her team chose their experts. I couldn't get past Dr. Spiegels weird facial ticks.
@@bettelouwhoI was going to say a lot of people have ticks and stuff they go through but this is very much drug behavior
@@bettelouwho It even more closely mirrors tardive dyskinesia, a common and serious side-effect of prolonged use of antipsychotics.
This is my favorite video yet, this legend just comes in and basically says "not only did that "expert" psychiatrist violate a fundamental rule of the profession but so did many of Heard's "expert" doctors." Slayed.
Ive already watched the live version but still coming back to watch this Professor’s testimony. Love his explanation and the way he delivered info & knowledges. His students are sooooo lucky. I want to join his lectures
Same
Lucky enough to work their asses off to get into the top schools in the country
@@jordyjohn2275 I think his point was lucky to have a good professor at said schools 😅
Stanford do publish their lectures on TH-cam. They've a really fascinating series of lectures on biology.
It won’t matter he is a real professional!
Now THIS is an expert witness. Amber's lawyers take note.
Well they probably know plenty of experts, just no one who was willing to bend the truth for them in court.
There is a golden rule in communication that Pascal wrote but never emphasized enough by cultures.
"If I had more time, I'd write a shorter letter."
More wisdom you get, more simple the explanation to understand. Spiegel blurts an entire thesis without subject of focus.
I'm not in psychiatry, but this guy inspires more confidence in the first 5 minutes than the other guy did in his entire testimony. The contrast in professionalism is staggering.
Heard's team need people willing to lie or speculate. I'll bet that's why they didn't call Walter Hamada themselves to the stand.
It's about how many experts Amber's team can find also willing to purger themselves 😂
Literally everyone who’s testified for AH have ruined their careers!!! She’s like a poisoned chalice.
Love how calm and level headed this guy is! It’s like the adults have been in charge today 😊
The parents showed up to the mean girls club.
Nah.. There will be more court cases like this. Just not as public
No they ruined it themselves. They could have refused to testify or decided to be neutral in their testimony.
You could say she's got the brown touch
It seems they are all complete nutjobs who don’t have much a career to begin with.
The witness from yesterday testified that she didn’t currently have any clients.
Only Dawn Hughes has a single accomplishment close to what all of Depp’s witnesses have.
She made a career destroying men’s lives with incredibly biased “expert” testimony that doesn’t even believe that men can ever be victims of women
To see somone who is an actual, real expert in their field and has dedicated their lives to it and knows their subject endlessly, makes my eyes water. Listening to competence nowadays feels like best kind of holiday.
Speaks a lot about how much BS we are bombarded with every single day.
We all have PTBD
Post Traumatic Bullshit Disorder
I keep having my psych 101 professor’s voice in my head billowing “correlation is not causation” - as he said every week. Psych 101. And that one guy seriously didn’t understand it. He forgot one of the most basic principles of psychology/psychiatry.
I really like listening to this expert. He's so polite and really easy to understand, especially compared to the weird and confusing Dr. Spiegel! I'd love to listen to him some more, as what he spoke about was really interesting.
Going to try see of I can find any of his books on amazon. Seems like it be a good read for folks interested in psychology.
@@toshiroyamada2443 Good idea! Maybe I will look up some of his books as well!
And he speaks with such reverence about what he does too. He and Dr. Curry, I really enjoyed watching them on the stand, and rewatching them is such good feels 😊
Aye his mannerisms are so perfect for treating seriously ill children, and the parents, family members, struggling with it.. he is a wonderful representative for the profession.
did you mean Doctor Smeagol?
00:17 He's so gentle & healing, makes me feel healed from the trauma I experienced yesterday from that other psychologist.. chaotic.
This guy is like Gandalf after he was resurrected or something. He's like the Dumbledore of the psychiatric world.
And his voice is so calm and soothing. He never gets upset or lashes out and is very knowledgeable. He knows why he's here and he's very confident in his skill.
Lol
“Johnny did you put your name in the goblet of fire!!”
@@sheikhnorsamsaturgo6779 you beat me too it XD
“Did you poop in his bed amber?” The lawyer asked calmly
The difference between the two of these guys is astounding. The level of professionalism this man has is near perfection, and he knows exactly what he is talking about. I’m so glad he agreed to this because he just wiped the stain that other man put on his profession.
I have done and administered the MMSE test mentioned at 34:05, it is administered to people with memory problems, like Alzheimer's and such. The three word question thing, is just ONE of the 10 or 11 questions in the test, if you fail it you would lose just 3 points in total out of 30 points. It is TOTALLY NORMAL for ordinary people to fail in one or two of the questions in that test, wholly or partially simply due to anxiety or whatever. Especially when its the three word question that also personally tripped me up when the test was done to myself during my education. I could not remember all the three words either, since its kind of a clever way the test does it on you. It is not repeating the three words, its remembering three words in correct order further down the line in the test after you think that question has been done and dusted, you are suddenly forced to recall something you might not considered important a moment ago. Its a gotcha moment in the test and it shows NOTHING as standalone if failed! If the rest of the questions are fine, it is worth considering only when subject starts having problems with large parts of rest of the questions too.
That Dr.Spiegel guy was CLEARLY meant as a damn trap for Depp. The biggest problem with him is that he is not some neutral court appointed psychiatrist, he is a psychiatrist appointed by Amber Heard who is getting paid by her! How nobody would see that as anything as attempt to legitimize smearing Depp's character is a fool or a liar.
Thanks for explaining that! Very informative and adds even more to understanding Spiegel’s disingenuity.
@@thestraightroad305 Sure, np. Yea it has questions such as: What is the name of the location you are in now (like town or city)? What is the date today? Who is the current president? What floor you are on now? Can you draw this pattern by using only straight lines and without raising the pen (like a cube or something similar iirc)?
After the first few questions, the interviewer suddenly says (according to the test) to memorize these 3 (short) words: like "dinner-laughing-yellow" or something similar, i don't have them memorized).
Then the test continues for like 5 or 6 questions and among the few last questions the test goes, by the way: Can you repeat the three random words you were supposed to memorize a while ago?
It is really dishonest not telling that it is completely normal for people to fail like 1-3 of these questions AND even if more questions are failed, the correct medical advice is to run MORE memory tests before drawing ANY conclusions, especially when this would be the very first time the subject got a such a test administered to him and does not have any previous memory diagnosis. Obviously it goes without saying that the subject also needs to be 100% sober for this test even to be considered.
Wow that is fascinating. What a complex field. I can see how someone who really wants to misrepresent evidence can make a wilderness out of this by leaving pieces out and subtly twisting things. It is obvious how and why the true expert wanted to speak truth into this situation and restore the integrity of his profession.
plus Johnny was up all night the day before and may or may not have been under the influence of alcohol and drugs, before doing the actual test, also you could feel pressured during those 5 minutes to remember those words and pressure can make you nervous.
I often forget things quickly so i repeat them to myself out loud for a 30s to a minute
AH lawyers: Objection!
Judge: On what grounds?
AH lawyers: His testimony is detrimental to our case!
But judge he’s destroying our experts testimony
He objected to the fact he had nothing solid to object to while everything is in flames on their side lol
objected bcoz their trying to protect their witness' credibility which is now.. well .. non existent. in comparison to this awesome Dr who really is actually the right bearer of the word "expert".
"Objection!" "Why?!" "Because it's devastating to my case!"
- Jim Carrey
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
The Goldwater rule is so important to both politics and psychology that not only is it covered in American history and early psych courses, but even the ethics 101 class I took covered it.The idea that anyone in the field would not know it is actually shocking.
Yes goldwater is important. Because previously you was faster in a psychiatry ,without that you see a psychiatrist.All you had to do was say something about you and the psychiatrist put you in a psychiatric ward.
@@brain-gymnastic I'm sorry but I have no clue what you just said. Are you related to Dr. Speigal by chance? >.>
@@xEvilRaptorx Earlier in general.
Doctor Smeagol was being paid a lot to forget about it...
@@xEvilRaptorx maybe we are seeing Erika’s poor attempt here to write a Haiku 🤣
23:46 yes. This exact thing happens with Dr. Spiegel from yesterday. He had a client who was suicidal, the family reached out for help and he never respomded, and the client committed suicide. So interesting that he brought that up.
This guy is here to defend his profession.
From the wrong information given by Amber's soo called experts.
He's not biased at all. He doesn't care about the trial.
He just doesn't want the profession to be made a mockery of.
The other Psychiatrist went into this guys' kitchen and, with lack of a better analogy, took a shit. Too bad he didn't realise the guy was an Archwizard...
You nailed it with school shootings. The media coverage is making other suicidal nut jobs think it's their ticket to fame and immortality. I respect your decision to report it without giving attention to the perpetrator.
Its why here in Scandinavia, *especially* in Norway, why we don't really use the name of the July 22nd terrorist because he wanted his name out there. I think its been quite well documented for a very long time now that we shouldn't be showing faces names of school shooters, its sad that the media haven't caught up
Also, less guns and more guys like this.
@@nettieforce1 more guns would be far more helpful with this issue then less guns. 🥴
@@nettieforce1 99% of mass shootings happen in gun free zones. Funny how that works isn't it. You want more of the populace armed to stop mass shootings, not less.
@@DarthSidianit’s amazing how some Americans see universal healthcare as something diabolical and a attack on their freedom yet they are perfectly fine with sending their children into a building with armed people in it just because they don’t want stricter laws that would prevent kids buying assault rifles at Walmart.
This man knows exactly what he's talking about. I enjoyed listening too him. He's very informative about different aspects of personalities. I sure hope AH's team was listening to a REAL authentic Doctor. He's simply amazing!!
It was an enjoyable listen, you can tell hes a lecturer with how he conveys knowledge and is very engaging.
For sure, I can definitely see why he is a lecturer, and a likely well liked one at that. Easy to listen too, and engaging in the way he talks about his field. Really wish that more lectures and professors have both these traits.
.......Is it just me or does he sound exactly like the imperial warlord from the first madolorian season?
Turd's psychiatrists: I'm going to diagnose Johnny without seeing or talking to him.
Depp's psychiatrists: talk to both Johnny and amber before providing any sort of diagnoses
Funny thing is this is the 2nd time it has happened. With Dr. Curry and that other women. Dr. Curry took both sides while the other psychologist didn't.
@@greatninja2590 yep that's what I mean. Dr Curry spoke with both Johnny and Amber Dr Hughes only spoke with amber
Sheeeeeyt man watched all the Pirate movies,hes totally qualified to diagnose him based on such concrete evidence
@@SailorYue Dr. Curry didn’t evaluate Depp. She was hired to evaluate Ms. Heard. She “talked to” Depp only in the sense that she spoke to him simply because she had to do her initial meeting with Depp’s team at Depp’s house (which is very uncommon but made sense here bc his celebrity rendered him pretty much homebound). She didn’t do a clinical evaluation of him though. No one did
@@aliioana8586 the point still stands that Dr quackinsmirtz insisted Johnny had all these things wrong with him and never met with him once. He watched a few of his excentric performances and twisted a rumor about Johnny and how he uses an earbud (to play music so he can focus while acting) conflating it with how Marlon Brando used an earpiece cuz he could never memorize his lines
This is crazy.... I actually understand what this expert witness is saying, compared to all of AH's "expert" witnesses.... It's almost as if he is an ACTUAL expert in the field.... and not just being paid to do a job.
Her expert reminded me of used care salesmen trying to sell you a rustbucket for thousands.
This guy is so very soft spoken and he made a very big difference to me completely crushed that quack of Turds yesterday..
It's like he is here to teach people.
Her "expert" was a homeless man from Central Park. They bathed him, gave him a suit and $100 buck to come there and say some shit and leave. No real expert in any field will come and bomb their own career like he did.
@@johnben93 he was not even wearing a suit, really? Did u even see it? He owned the park! God where were you?
By the 5 minute mark, I thought this guy was an absolute legend. By minute 20, I realised I had massively underestimated him!
This man spent his life getting educated while the rest of us just sat back and had a glass of wine and whatever else. Look how it paid off for him. I am so impressed
This absolute gentleman of a Dr, so professional, so calm, so knowledgeable. The complete opposite of the angry, argumentative pompous fool that amber had up there.
A mega psychiatrist!
Do u notice how most of the ppl brought in by Amber's team almost mirror the mannerisms of Amber and her team?
@@aninsimone they say likeminded people are attracted to eachother, all amber needs is a stand from jojo.
Johnny's legal team has only archmages.
Even Johnny was paying attention and watching as if he himself was learning like us by listening to this guy. This was great 👍
TLDR, psychiatrist is LITERALLY out here doing God's work helping children with serious and various medical problems throughout treatment. At the same time counseling the parents of said children to cope with the trauma they're experiencing.
Amber Heard and her team should feel like shit for taking hours out of his day, keeping him from REAL patients, to prove that AH is a POS.
He is a rare gift to humanity. Intelligent, compassionate, principled, and thoughtful.
Even among the best psychiatrists and doctors, it is all too common for the parents of ill children to be neglected
What is God's work?
@@somejock4396 doing good deeds
Everytime Amber's team brings an "expert" Johnny's team brings a real expert and it feels like they're just stacking uno reverse cards at this point.
This Dr is expressing disgust towards unethical & unprofessional behaviors from any given licensed “psychiatrist”
He is so knowledgeable, I felt I was in one of his University psychiatry & behavioral science classes
I would pay to listen to this man speak on any subject of his choosing.
Am I the only person who felt that AHs team didn't want people to understand the ethical rules, why they were established, why they work, and how they are supposed to be applied?
@Hadja Camara they have $6.5 million 🙄
@@MrEpic86 And Johnny is suing Amber for 50 Mil, and she's Counter Suing for 100 Mil
6.5 Mil isn't really that much in the grand scheme of this case
I could also listen to him all day, his voice itself is incredibly calming
He speaks so softly,it’s very smoothing. I’m sure his patients love him
Soothing too.. I concur
@@susanbockh5071 this will be in an ‘unintentional asmr’ video
He's probably a master hypnotist jedi mind trick Master
I would like him to read a story. His voice is very calming.
@@mariotibbrine1 I would have to agree with you lol. I feel like he could convince much of the population that what he is saying is correct, purely based on his way of speech.
Thank God for a real Dr. that shows compassion to his patients. I highly relate as a parent with a son that has autism and several delays plus adhd. It is very hard not receiving support from professionals it can be emotionally draining not knowing how to help your child. 💔
I can relate, it took 5 years to get a diagnosis of autism for my daughter, passed from pillar to post. Got there in the end but she leave school in a year
My son is non verbal autistic and ADHD it's really hard it's not easy. I know after my boys were in nicu I struggled for a long time mentally in the UK the care isn't good for parents x
My son is 5 years old autistic non verbal and ADHD u and I agree it can get very emotionally draining not knowing how to help him and wishing I could take it away
Lots and lots of love and support to you and your family!♥️
@@rachelmeadows6191 totally get you huni my little one is 8 now and in a sen school which makes a big difference to him but he's such a loving little boy although he can struggle with his emotions etc. If you want to talk let me know and il find a way to send you my Facebook or something x
It's nice to see an actual EXPERT in psychiatry, not the lunatic that was on the stand the other day. We get to hear a professional in his field that answered each question in a clear, even tone, and kept on point with his answers. Hell, "doctor" Speigel couldn't be bothered to comb his hair, how could the defense think he was an expert?
This guy basically did on average 2 manuscripts, a book chapter & almost 2 depositions every year for his whole career on top of all his clinical & medical work
It's funny how her experts are any combination of sleazy, unethical or crazy while JD's are always extremely calm and professional. Even the Hollywood lawyer! You know something is wrong when a Hollywood lawyer looks better than any experts on the other side
It's cus that's probably the only people who would even take this case for AH after seeing all the material that was related to the case.
Hey man he’s down there in the trenches. I respect that.
@@wowitsfrostygames155 I agree, it's just not what you'd expect when you're told he's a lawyer from Hollywood.
This was so satisfying to see someone with this many accolades call the previous psych out for being unethical. The previous guy's mental gymnastics and defensiveness were huge red flags.
The jaw dropping moment yesterday when the goon said JD was narcissistic because he thought AH wanted his money. That was reality not narcissism. My cat would know that
Not only is this guy an actual expert with a ton of accolades, but he also teaches psychology. Could not have chosen a better person to explain this stuff to the laymen in the audience. It's almost like you can get better expert witnesses when you're actually telling the truth.
Psychiatry **
Yeah, don't confuse the 2, psychiatrists and psychologists hate each other. Look up APA (American Psychiatric Association) vs APA (American Psychological Association), they're like children 🤣
Psychiatrist= requires a doctorate, they are physicians, can prescribe medicines and do more study related work with use of statistics and analysis, usually not trained in psychotherapy.
Psychologist= does not require a doctorate, trained in at least one form of psychotherapy, usually can't prescribe medicines but can in certain jurisdictions if they go through training, trained in administration of diagnostic testing and the analysis and interpretation of said tests.
There's a ton of overlap, but psychiatrist deal with more of the physical brain while psychologists deal more with the effects of the brain.
This man is the real deal. Obviously, Very educated and extremely knowledgeable in his specific field of expertise and the countless branches off that tree.
I as well feel I learned a lot from listening to him.
I specifically took note that he is not defensive or argumentative.
He does not have to be.
I'm glad we here in NZ were blessed to have Dr. Shaw among us for a time. He expressed how unfortunate Spiegel's actions were and how it will affect practitioners in his field, but he never degraded the man. He never outrightly condemned Spiegel, this he left open for the jury to decide.
Dr. Shaw is the kind of doctor I'm glad we have in this crazy world ❤️
Oh really, did he ever come to Australia?
@Pascal's wager Dr. Shaw doesn't mention Aus, but I'd be surprised if he hasn't visited you guys :3
Yea it’s so frustrating when I hear British/Aus/NZ people mixed up 😆
@@pascalswager9100 Another Australian here, Dr Shaw knows his business and delivered it with CLASS. 💯👍💯👍🐨🦘🙃
among us
Been loving the judge for this whole trial but she gave WAY too much leeway to AHs team here with respect to objections. I understand most of court proceedings comes down to how stuff is worded and such, but not allowing him to continue his examples under the grounds that he “proved his point and already did that”? That was goofy as hell
Her Honor is saving time...she ain't got too much more for this one...
PENNY IS A GEM
I read somewhere else that speculates the judge being lenient with AH to basically cancel any attempts for AH team to plead judge bias. She lets them short victories in exchange for less longterm gain after the trial.
I've been a fan of this judge throughout this trial despite the fact I feel she gave amber heards lawyers too much leeway. But sustaining an objection to the doctor describing a psychiatric test is absolutely ridiculous. Maybe it was because he was using a metaphor but even then, I don't see how a psychiatric expert can't try to explain a complex concept in layman's terms. I think she was completely wrong about this one. I also don't understand why he couldn't comment on the medical records while spiegel was allowed to use it in his testimony. It's absolutely ridiculous, at the least they should have been allowed to lay the foundation by referring to the records and what they say.
I couldn’t agree more. Yet she let Sméagol go on outrageous tangents that went nowhere for what felt like hours, again felt as if nothing was said and make wild accusations about Depp.
@@ichigokage That is actually a good thing IMO. Since all it did was waste their time. Remember, there's a time bank and Johnny's team still has a LOT of juice in it while Amber's team is basically out of gas.
ehh, I saw nothing wrong...he compared a test to taking a person's temperature. alot of what happens in a court room revolves around language. you say the wrong thing and good lawyers find a way to stop the line of questions. also I'm pretty sure the judge let the other "expert" just dig a hole for himself and amber
@@caroo367 he didn't have to finish the simile for the jury to get what he was saying imo, the objection came late enough for them to fill in the gaps if they were paying attention
@@caroo367 I got this vibe too. I feel like the judge has already reached a conclusion and is just trying to let them hang themselves
Johnny Depp is the very antithesis of a narcissist. He does NOT want attention from others. His fame does not feed his ego, quite the opposite. He is also genuinely caring and compassionate toward others. He gives generously to others. "Jealousy" or concern for the woman he loves and her reputation? Johnny is probably the least narcissistic person in that courtroom.
This man is a level 20 divination wizard who ascended to true, lawful good. We must bow down to this man. All hail the gigawizard!
I might get shout at for saying this, but, JD really should see this guy after then trial. This is a very good and caring psychiatrist, and those are hard to find, with all the ordeal that he has been through it is "imperative" for a person to help you and guide you through all the drama. Wish all the best for JD's and his kids.
💯💯💯💯
I don't see why anyone would have a go at you for your opinion, it's a good one 👌. He should seek professional help and this guy would be great, I wish he was my Dr. I noticed Johnny took a lot of interest in what he was saying, maybe he will see him after the trial?
Ur 100%,right about Dr Sure.,if ur serious about seeking help from a caring n understanding psychedelic doc. ON the other hand,if u just 1a F-around and have a laugh,seek Dr Siegel(Evil Gargelmel-smurf)for 1 session Just sitting looking at his ugly,fish lips face,and his ridiculous insane explanation,wood have u roll,wood be funny enuff for a laugh🤪
💯
Well said.100% he has to go to this guy and I would go ahead and suggest AH should also go so she can live a better life. We are all humans and we make mistakes. Learn get help and move on !
I worked in mental health for over 10 years, and this might be the first guy anyone has put on the stand who comes off like a real psychiatrist or psychologist who takes their job seriously. He’s like one of the doctors who studied LSD in the 50s and 60s in Saskatchewan trying to find a cure for alcoholism. Seems like a good shrink.
How did those studies go? Care to give a synopsis? Links to the paper are fine as well. Thanks
Surprised you would use the word "shrink" being someone who worked in the field for 10 years. I've been in the field for 7 years myself and that term seems a bit outdated and almost hollywood-ized, if you will.
@@MrPeabody67 the studies went well. I cant point out papers right now but as far as im aware there are practices that already use lsd and psilocybin in therapy. It lowers the ego and allows the patient to be far more open which is obviously beneficial when talking about anything traumatic. Johns Hopkins University have published a lot about it. Im sure they have youtube videos about it too.
@@MrEpic86 Any that do in the United States? Finding anyone who does cPTSD work in south Texas has been a nightmare.
@@chesneymigl4538 I dont know, The Center for Psychedelic Research and Therapy at Dell Medical School at The University of Texas might be able to help you find somewhere if you can contact someone there.
I love when *actual* *experts* show up and literally says many things and we learn from them a lot.
Agree
The fact that this uber-prepared expert with a brutal amount of knowledge gets objected every time he is about to explain in great and precise detail just WHY the previous evaluations of Dr.Schmeagol were wrong, and that objection is actually sustained, just explains how much unable the judiciary can be to process very deep, specialized amounts of information.
To be fair, it might not even hurt Depp's side that much since his experts really show they're experts through their in-depth explanations and clear and concise reasoning, but at the same time, that takes up a lot of time so perhaps AH's lawyers are doing them a solid by allowing them to move on and have more time for other things since the expert has already made their points more clearly than anyone on AH's side.
To be fair, there are times where he did go beyond the scope of the question, although I wanted him to keep going, because he is so interesting and calm.
Also, I feel like the judge has done a pretty good job so far at being unbiased.
Also I think it gives an opportunity to depp's team to reframe their questions and dig in
@@zoobeeda yup I agree. Sometimes it was just too much detail and at some points it just took up too much of the court's time, even though its very interesting. at the end of the day its a trial, not a lecture
though after seeing this I'd love to attend one of his lectures if he gives any lol
I disagree on the judiciary part. In all honesty, they likely know of this information, either because it was testified before, they found out of own volition, they were required to by a professor who so happens to emphasize on psychology as well, or just...common sense. And by common sense, I meant that while his information is insightful, it's insightful when we're trying to learn psychology, not when we're participating in a court case that's running out of time. The room's about law, not necessarily psychology.
The things Rottenborn is objecting to (when the expert was comparing jealously and envy, when he likened the test to taking someone's temperature) are literally things experts are taught to do in order to make the information more digestible and relatable to the jury. They're taught to use common examples in order to help the jury understand concepts they're unfamiliar with. Essentially, Rottenborn doesn't want the jury to understand the processes that are being described. Or, in Asmon's words, "Objection: they're using facts, Your Honor, and it makes my client look bad."
Lawyer: "Dr. Shaw what is your current position/do/books you've written/lecture given/association you're in/currently working at?"
Dr. Shaw: "Everything possible and 50x deposition/peer reviewed medical findings/multiple books written"
Dr. Spiegel: *Surprised Pikachu face*
The difference is insane. Dr. Shaw makes you feel like he is a real psychiatrist you can trust, he is polite, nice and generally just gives out an aura of "Wow, this guy is a doctor and he is professional"
Dr. Speigel is.......... interesting.
Spiegel + the guy AH's team brought for social media analysis both look like THE stereotypical DEEP STATE person you'd imagine. Super socially awkward, odd posture, in a really generic suit/tie, old with gray/white weird aloof hair.
The dude is stanford level. I would wish that to be the case
The difference in all the experts has been extreme
This made me laugh out loud lmao
Camille > Elaine
Ben > Rottenboomer
Dr. Curry > ALL
Dr. Shaw > Dr. Strangelove
I’ve got ADD & I’ve struggled to listen to any of the testimonies in full, except for this man. He’s fascinating. I want him to look after me 😂🙏
♥️
Super interesting learning about the goldwater rule and the APA's general outline of ethical requirements in class today. Thanks professor Gold.
I love how the single most credentialed expert during this trial gets an objection! Lol. I missed Dr. Smeagle yesterday, so need to go back and watch that debaucle!!
Thanks for continuing to share the JD and AH trial with us. I’ve been enjoying all your side commentary. I look forward to catching up with your stream at the end of my work day in SF, CA
I could listen to this man speak all day, what an incredibly informative expert.
For real, he could give a lecture for 2 hours straight and I would listen without losing any focus
I would love to audit any class this Man teaches!
Kinda wish I was a kid to have him as my councilor.
It really doesn’t look good for the defense to keep objecting when the man is simply explaining the facts of psychiatry
Depp's witnesses was so much more credible than Heard's. It's like the difference between night and day.
I could listen to this man talk all day, the way he explains things makes me actually understand everything he says and is so interesting. What a witness!
Love the fact that JD really started to look at this professor. You could see JD really pays attention to what he said and felt understood and calm.
It's so refreshing and enlightening when a REAL expert witness is called to the stand. There's no posturing or self entitlement attitude that we, lay persons, have to contend with.
I like how the first series of questions is just about how extensive his resume is, how involved he is, how long he's been in his field, and how credible he is as an expert witness.
Where are the accomplishments of ANY of Amber's witnesses beyond the, "My opinion is IMPORTANT," attitude that they all seem to carry around and the amount of money they're making just by being involved in the trial?
In my opinion all of AH witness are terrible beyond belief.
It's mindblowing. In comparison to these ACTUAL experts, her experts clearly didn't even do basic research on the matters they felt qualified to give 'expert' opinions on. It makes me wonder if anyone can just fake their way into any industry of their choice and make a living off of giving 'expert' testimonies that pay 500 an hour.
Heard's "experts" did give admirable backgrounds and credentials. The problem is they all wound up looking like clowns because they manipulated information and they were picked apart easily. They were seen through by average people without college education. The lies are shattering Heard and her "experts."
@@jenex6918 fake it till you make it. Rarely are wiser words spoken.
I'm a woman and I wish I was more like this man...I mean his calm demeanor. I'm a nervous person from past childhood trauma. I wish so much that I could be like this.
Me too. Yoga helps me. But yeah I’d love to be so calm and grounded like this lovely doctor.
same. recently started yoga, meditation and lots of lavender help.
You can, but it's up to you to let go of that past so you can transform into who you want to be 🤍
Ashwagandha is wonderful for many people to ease anxiety. It is an ancient herb you can get in capsule form. It has many other health benefits too 😊
I’m with you there.
The difference between Depp's experts and Hurd's "experts" is staggering.
A Lawyer could learn to properly screen their experts from this trial. A training program if you will.
Mind boggling the difference in class and education betwixt the two.
What a great point. Lawyers should totally look at this for years for training purposes.
Absolutely right!!!
Don't think they had much of a choice. They have nothing to go on, so they probably had to scrape the bottom of the barrel to get anyone to say anything they could use.
Your take on the media with school shooters is spot on. Thank you Asmongold. I hope those killed in school shootings, as well as their families, find peace.
Absolutely. The terrible system and media take no credit for what happens, and then try to bash us over the head wanting our laws to be more like Chicago or Detroit in order to "stop shootings".
How about they stop giving shooters fame and we see what happens instead?
On top of that, the public school system is notoriously bad at actually taking care of kids / etc, and a lot of times these people get reported on continuously with nothing actually done about it. It's our system failing in the first place, and they think it'll be fixed by depending even more on the system. The only thing it'd change is disarming the people who are the ones we want to be armed. There are so many cases of crimes being stopped because the right people were armed and ready, and they NEVER discuss that. It's actually an insane amount of crimes prevented because people have weapons to protect themselves and others. Anyone who is curious about it, I'd definitely recommend researching into it, because when I saw the numbers for myself I was shocked.
Personally, I always prefer the crime channels that talk about the VICTIMS and their stories over people who go on and on about the killers. We should scrub the killers' names and photos from history - it's probably the one time I'd be okay with censorship. Maybe keep that information somewhere for reference or something, for research purposes for people actually in those fields, but don't publicize it all over the place.
Let's be fair, this is such a sophisticated and well informed man. Dr. Spiegel is nothing compared to him. Can't even stand in this man's shadow.
Dr. Sméagol*
@@MrAxeswinger haha, spot on :D
Eloquent, well spoken, and incredibly intelligent, yet still oozes GigaChad energy. What a fucking legend.
Can we all just appreciate how much this guy seems like a genuine kind and caring soul.
It takes someone with a tough crust and a good heart to be strong enough to help guide children through the mental side of the worst things they may face in life.
100% my respect for this guy and what he does is of the highest level. A gift to the people he works with and the people he treats.
To touch on what the doctor was saying about the difference between envy and jealousy, which is an important distinction, especially when it comes to a clinical diagnosis:
Envy is a strong - often pathological - desire for what someone else has that you do not, whereas jealousy is being overly protective of what you have due to fear it will be taken from you.
Now here's a dedicated layman ...35 yr career with so many fine works he has impressed me greatly...go ahead with yourself sir you are a shining light in your hard life's work...you love your work and it shows...ty for explaining in terms we understand.. thanks for working with my favorite, sick children.. bless you and them...
He's not a layman. He's a professional in his field.
He as kept himself involved and moved forward with changes in his field. Spiegal seems to have kept himself in work with his outdated learning.Both being experts and can make a great impact on patients is scary
Is this the raid boss psychiatrist?
"Have you published anything through the APA?"
"All of them, actually. I've also written over 70 books and a college textbook that's on its second edition."
Lmao
I like his calm poise, expert opinion based in fact and delivered with absolute certainty.
The pledge did have a time limit according to the divorce agreement. The $3.5 million was never to be dragged out. Amber was to DONATE the money as soon as she received the $7 million from JD. Let’s be real. Amber never intended to donate $7 million.
But but but…she pledged to do it ,which means absolutely nothing. Love all the jokes going around about “pledging” to pay their electrical bill and now their lights are out. And so on.They should’ve stayed harder on the fact she had 13 months to make those donations and didn’t. She got caught up in the moment with a reporter and now is stuck in her lies. I’m going to go fill up my jeep with gas I’m gonna pledge to pay them and takeoff see how it works out for me.
I absolutely love this witness, he knows what he is talking about and he can relay his knowledge and professional opinions on a somewhat tricky subject *psychiatry* in a way that everyone in the room and everyone that is watching can digest easily and understand. Usually you find experts using big exaggerated words, and he is very very well spoken with out having to use huge words or knowledge bravado on his profession... great witness!
Dr Shaw: I know what Im talking about.
Rottenborn: Objection
Holy crap, what a massive difference between JD's psychiatrist witness and amber's.
This psychiatrist is on master level in his field. And he speaks concisely, clear and professional. Well, he is a professor after all.
That pledge thing is garbage. She said on tv "I wanted nothing", tilting her nose up as if she was the second coming of mother teresa and all have to kneel before her generosity. If she didn't want it she should have donated all of it at onece, as fast as possible, so the hospital could actualy use that mony, instead of waiting.
That's how you help people. If you see someone dying from thirst, you don't give them one drop of water, and Pledge the rest of the water, and say I'll give it to you in installment with each one being 1 year apart.
It’s worth noting that, though she said she wanted “nothing”, her initial divorce demands included a Range Rover (with Johnny continuing to make the payments), 3 penthouses (with Johnny continuing. to pay rent and/or mortgages), and numerous other things.
@@quillboy34 agreed completely. She had been fighting for something, not nothing, since breaking up with JD. As much as possible in fact. As you said, and as the court documents and the "ransom" letter states. Provide all this stuff (vehicles, houses, bills, money) or else...
All the Judge's sustained objections from amber's team was for me- being the reason she sustained it was the Psychiatrist was literally starting to talk as if he was teaching in a lecture, and it was really straying away from the scope of the case but it was really intresting like maaan- i felt like i was learning from him just speaking there
Yet she never did the same for Sméagol. He rambled for ages. This guy is at least informative.
@@ichigokage yeaahhh, the only reason i could come up with that is really... the Judge just let that man ramble on for the sake of having a statement and see where it was going to be leading, cause none of what the dude said had true and factual basis from an 'Expert' Psychiatrist point of view,,, while this actual Expert Psychiatrist that stated and actually acted professionally and shared his thoughts in the same manner, which is what a psychiatrist should act- has too much truth and facts to say, really he didn't need to start expanding out the scope of the case.
If my explanation made sense.
@@ichigokage bear in mind, that JD’s team chose not to object most of the time to let him ramble and dig himself a hole. Never interrupt your opponent when they are making a mistake.
I hope when this court case ends Johnny can escape from the public eye for a while and go to a tranquil retreat somewhere and create some amazing artwork that will heal his soul, he is looking pretty beaten emotionally and spiritually,he's certainly been put through the wringer,
So they can bust JD in the kitchen video but can’t bust Amber for secretly recording a person without his consent violating his privacy?? What a double standard!!
This doctor is the real deal, unlike the 'doctor' that was up there yesterday This guy is so intelligent, articulate, Love it!! He is an expert in his field (and probably other fields too) Damn smart fella! How weird though for the court to take a break in the middle of the doctor's testimony.
Tbf a judge is only human too, they can not go like "Hey listen I really really gotta use the bathroom real quick just excuse me for a second I´ll brb". Or something similar you know. So I guess it´s fair to just go like "Listen it´s breaktime, so we gonna take a break"
@@Polkaknot but that's really not a suprise though I think if they didn't the judge would of needed a therapist listening to dr smeagol
1:19
Johnny’s reaction to him stuttering while saying he works with children who have severe medical conditions says it all
He recognized there was some trauma behind that stutter and he sympathized and gave him his full attention because he’s been there
He constantly visited sick children
I work with sick children as well
it’s the hardest job in the world when it comes to mental stress
but if you can make a difference for the little ones it’s worth the struggles
what timeframe is this please?
@@aiamcharina 1:30
are you doing a spiegel? i cant really see a reaction and it feels like a big over interpretation
@@ImAnOcean did you have a mega pint before deciding to make your asinine comment ?
You can literally watch him look up and give the doctor his attention
it’s called body language and it doesn’t take a college degree to recognize it
This Doctor is the most laid back, Confidence oozing, Down to earth , Knowledgeable and Professional person i have seen during this travesty perpetrated against Mr Depp..
Judge seems pretty good too!!
When someone can explain something it doesn’t mean they understand as you can see from AH experts, JD experts are constantly showing how much knowledge and experience they actually have.
That first guy isn't just a wizard or archwizard, he's a damn Lore Master when it comes to his field of study.