Basics of Panel ARDL

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 346

  • @CrunchEconometrix
    @CrunchEconometrix  6 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    TH-cam recently changed the way my content will be monetised. My channel now needs 1,000 subscribers. So it would be amazing if you show your support by both watching my videos and subscribing to my channel if you haven’t done so already. Monetising my videos allows me to invest back into the channel with some new equipment so this small gesture from you will be extremely huge for me. Many thanks for your support….CrunchEconometrix loves to teach, support my Channel with your subscription and sharing my videos with your cohorts.

  • @bettytuhaise2686
    @bettytuhaise2686 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for that supportive heart and for being generous with your knowledge base. I have been greatly helped.

  • @rayeugene5090
    @rayeugene5090 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Prof your tutorials are always simplified, accurate and educative. Thank you

  • @elinakim6349
    @elinakim6349 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You are a blessed and gifted educator, Dr.Ngozi! you've been such a blessing. God bless you more!

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Elina, I'm encouraged and humbled by your feedback. May God bless you. Please may I know from where (location) you are reaching me?

    • @elinakim6349
      @elinakim6349 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix amen! I'm from Kazakhstan 🇰🇿, but currently a foreign student in China 🇨🇳 doing my master's. I really mean what I've said previously. You've been like an answer for my prayers asking God to help and lead me through. With your clear instructions I've conquered successfully through bachelor's and graduated in 2018. Now this is my final mile in master's and you're again here leading me through it again. During bachelor's dealt with time series, now panel data😁 let me repeat myself, you're a blessing🙏

  • @NihatGumus-gj9bm
    @NihatGumus-gj9bm ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just come up with your channel. As a teacher of Financial Econometrics, I strongly recommend your channel to my students. Thank you for your support to the "Sharing Economy".

  • @abdullaigaucho653
    @abdullaigaucho653 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I just came across this video today and I believe your videos will have a tremendous benefit in my studies. Prof, I endorse your style of teaching.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad it was helpful, Abdullai! ...and thanks for the encouraging feedback, deeply appreciated!

  • @katrinahtenjah9460
    @katrinahtenjah9460 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You have been such a blessing in my econometrics journey. Thank you prof

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Katrinah, for the encouraging feedback. Deeply appreciated! ❤️🙏

  • @YonasKiflom-o2h
    @YonasKiflom-o2h 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best lecture ever I have seen. Thank you Prof.

  • @felixlagemann8109
    @felixlagemann8109 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great professor, thank you Dr. Ngozi!

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      U're welcome, Felix...may I know from where (location) you are reaching me?

    • @felixlagemann8109
      @felixlagemann8109 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      From Erasmus University in Rotterdam, Netherlands :)

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@felixlagemann8109 Awesome! I will appreciate if you can spread the word about my videos to your students and academic community in Netherlands 🇳🇱! 💕 😊

  • @parfaitberi3974
    @parfaitberi3974 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this video.

  • @BrianJasonPonce
    @BrianJasonPonce 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Again, another job well done, Dr. Thank you for this highly informative and straightforward lesson!

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the encouraging words and feedback, Brian!

  • @mohammedalnour318
    @mohammedalnour318 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent performance, you may not know how is it helpful . Thanks Dr

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I always appreciate your encouraging feedback, Mohd. Deeply appreciated! 🙏

    • @mohammedalnour318
      @mohammedalnour318 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix Dr, I do appreciate your efforts. I have some questions, how can I investigate the impact of COVID-19 on global economy empirically? using the Panel ARDL Model?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mohd, COVID-19 time series data will be a great challenge given it is a current phenomenon. You can do a qualitative study, cross-sectional analysis or descriptive analysis if you have sufficient data.

    • @mohammedalnour318
      @mohammedalnour318 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix thanks Dr, do you think that the structural equation modelling (SEM) can be a better technique of analysis for such study?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can't say, honestly.

  • @rachelmacauley3818
    @rachelmacauley3818 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent video. Thank you very much indeed.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the positive feedback, Rachel...I'll appreciate if you can help spread the word about my Channel by sharing my link and videos😍

  • @oumasstabdallah9355
    @oumasstabdallah9355 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I miss you beautiful PROFESSOR. ❤❤❤❤❤

  • @moonsafar5718
    @moonsafar5718 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much for useful video.👍

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      U're welcome, Moon Safar😊. Please may I know from where (location) you are reaching me?

    • @moonsafar5718
      @moonsafar5718 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix I am from middle east.😍

    • @moonsafar5718
      @moonsafar5718 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Could you direct me how can I estimate in panel data ( ARDL, OLS, J.J OR E.J).

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@moonsafar5718 Watch the panel ARDL collection. I'll upload those of OLS in a few days. What's J. J and E. J?

  • @hudamajid2842
    @hudamajid2842 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very informative video.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Compliment is humbly taken, Huja! May I know from where (location) you are reaching me?

  • @بخيتهجادكريم
    @بخيتهجادكريم ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thankyou very much it enrich tutorial

  • @SharafatAliPK
    @SharafatAliPK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You're doing a great job Adeleye

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the positive feedback, appreciated 🙏

  • @keeeabdnfjks6800
    @keeeabdnfjks6800 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Thank so muchh for helpíng.

  • @edgarndani5238
    @edgarndani5238 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love you. This is wat I was looking for. Thank you Ma

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      U're welcome Edgar. I had no idea that this was the procedure you meant. Glad I could help in some little way...😊

  • @busayovictorosuntuyi4716
    @busayovictorosuntuyi4716 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for you clear explanation Madam

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      U're welcome, Sir! Positive feedback is deeply appreciated!

  • @enongenebetrand1119
    @enongenebetrand1119 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Much thanks our academic engine for the insight.

  • @moonsafar5718
    @moonsafar5718 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you very much, you are super prof, could you prepare video talking about Panel ARDL but on Eviews ( on program Eviews), I do not know if that is possible.👍👍👍

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Moon Safar, I'll do my best. Though, unlike Stata, the EViews interface is not very friendly for panel data analysis...and thanks for the compliments, humbly accepted😊❤️

  • @ngusbekele2920
    @ngusbekele2920 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks for your information DR. but what if the number of observation is greater than the the time period ( what will be the modal specification). I am eagerly looking for ward for your answer. thanks for your time...

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If N > T, you can deploy FE, RE, GMM, and Error Component Models. Thanks.

  • @takrimas
    @takrimas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It is a wonderful lecture video. However, would you mind telling me how FMOLS and DOLS can be implemented on the ARDL framework?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Takrima, I have noted the suggestion but in the interim, you may need to check other online resources. Thanks.

  • @themhamadi
    @themhamadi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are amazing teacher.
    Great professor, thank you Dr. Ngozi!
    When are you going to produce Vector error correction on Panel data with STATA?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Moundhir, for the encouraging feedback. Deeply appreciated! At the moment, I have videos on PVAR-GMM published on my Teachable platform cruncheconometrix.teachable.com

  • @hidayatullah7068
    @hidayatullah7068 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice I like it's lactures.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Hidayat, for the positive feedback. Please share my videos with your colleagues and may God bless you, amen!

    • @hidayatullah7068
      @hidayatullah7068 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix offcours

  • @dhakaramkadel3671
    @dhakaramkadel3671 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome presentation.
    would you please see this?
    While conducting the ARDL model with four variables in Eviews, all the variables are non-stationary at level, but at the first difference, i.e., I(1), two variables, including the dependent variable, are stationary without taking their log, but two other independent variables are with log only. Should I need to use a log for all the variables in this situation?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks, Dhaka for your positive feedback. Deeply appreciated ☺️. Functional forms of a model is very crucial. Can greatly influence the outcome of your results. Take all logs and see what you get compare it to when you have mixed forms.

    • @dhakaramkadel3671
      @dhakaramkadel3671 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix Thank you very much.

  • @nausheensodhi803
    @nausheensodhi803 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this video. It is so clear and on point. However, I have to clarify if panel ARDL can be used for a dataset containing T=15 and N=19. Any input on this will be highly appreciated.

  • @RohiNkwama
    @RohiNkwama 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thanks Professor for the great video. I have a Question: can you run a Panel ARDL regressions with a mixture of variables, some at levels and some at first differences?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes but it is important that the dependent variable is I(1).

  • @onwejoshuachukwuma4395
    @onwejoshuachukwuma4395 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks Dr for the Video
    Please what's your take on this
    What Econometric estimation can be use for panel small N (country) and large T( Time) when unit root is at level ?
    Again ma when one have a missing data in a panel can one interpolate and use the interpolated data for estimation.
    Hope to get feedback from you .

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Jo, if all the variables are I(0) perform pooled OLS. I worry less about interpolating data. I use unbalanced panel data as it is. Thanks.

    • @onwejoshuachukwuma4395
      @onwejoshuachukwuma4395 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix Thanks very helpful

  • @kejisunday296
    @kejisunday296 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well done Dr. Ngozi. Please, which of the following is best estimating spillover effects in a panel data anylysis? Is it System GMM or Panel ARDL.

  • @josephtokpah8238
    @josephtokpah8238 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks very much for such an excellent explanation.
    Prof. I want to know whether there is a way to do the stability test using PMG ARDL?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks, Joseph for the encouraging feedback. Not sure about stability diagnostics in PMG. You may want to check out other online resources.

  • @moisedjepangkouamo469
    @moisedjepangkouamo469 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great and helpfull Dr. nevertheless can we have a playlists to how run a GMM model on eviews? and Panel ARDL on eviews. thanks !!!

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kindly check other online resources. Thanks.

  • @busaritajudeen9168
    @busaritajudeen9168 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You are amazing teacher. When are you going to produce Random Effect and Fixed Effect on Panel data with STATA?
    You be Amazing mother too

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the kind words, Busari. I do have those videos. Check out the Stata Panel Data Playlists. Thanks 😊

  • @silarbiyoucef5888
    @silarbiyoucef5888 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent explanation, please how do we explain the significance of the parameters in cs-ardl model ?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Silarbi, results interpretations are mostly the same across different estimation techniques. So, give the usual interpretation.

  • @sabashah1160
    @sabashah1160 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanku mam
    Please suggest some study material for panel ARDL

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Saba, there are suggested references at the end of my panel ARDL videos. Thanks.

    • @sabashah1160
      @sabashah1160 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ok mam Thanku for replying

  • @aminaahmedalibelal5676
    @aminaahmedalibelal5676 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One of your great videos. If my variables are cointegrated with Pedroni test, but the results of long run equations show insignificant variables. Does this mean cointegration is not present?
    Thanx

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Amina, you can use the Pedroni results to validate cointegration.

  • @lingchen5238
    @lingchen5238 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dr. Ngozi, thank you for your video,it's really very helpful,but i want to know ,do you have the NARDL model teaching video,looking forward to your reply,thank u

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the positive feedback, Ling. But I don't have any videos on NARDL.

    • @lingchen5238
      @lingchen5238 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix OK ,Thank you

  • @jokosusilo9009
    @jokosusilo9009 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great explanation, ma'am professor, but I want to ask something That's the meaning of the ARDL model below of the notation for the sigma p and q? There is j=1 and j=0? Does j represent a unit or group sample from a cross-section or something else?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Joko, i have responded to this same query on another thread you posted it. They represent time specifications.

  • @donasp5391
    @donasp5391 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you! Great resource! I subscribed!
    1. If I have 368 companies and period is 2010-2018, I cannot use ARDL if I understood correctly. What would you suggest? I would appreciate if you can suggest me an appropriate model and maybe a book for more information about my case.
    2. If I would have 2 groups of countries (highly innovative and slightly innovative), could I use ADLR?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Miha, thanks for your subscription. I am grateful.
      1) Since you have a short panel where N > T, panel ARDL is not applicable. Use FE, RE, and GMM. Kindly watch my videos on those techniques.
      2) Watch my video on "Tips to building a panel data". Kind regards.

    • @donasp5391
      @donasp5391 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much! ☺️ Since I have missing data, could I use ML too? I was thinking GMM+ML. Kind regards.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The "orthogonal" option takes care of missing values.

    • @donasp5391
      @donasp5391 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you very much! I am grateful for your advice. Have a wonderful day!

  • @yassinyahia2453
    @yassinyahia2453 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Prof. Ngozi, thanks for your nice job. Do you have video on how to perform pooled mean group estimator in stata?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes Yassin, that is what I did in this panel ARDL series. Kindly watch to get more information supported by reading references indicated at the end of the videos.

    • @yassinyahia2453
      @yassinyahia2453 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix Dear Prof. Ngozi. Thnx very much for your prompt response.

  • @nawalin12
    @nawalin12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for sharing Dr.. I have a question, since panel ARDL is about long-run and short-run estimation, how to specify short-run and long-run model? thank you.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Nawalin, get any published article on panel ARDL to see how the model is specified.

    • @nawalin12
      @nawalin12 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix Tq
      hank you for the quick respond, I did collect many of journals on panel ARDL, all of them just specify general panel ARDL equation and the reparameterized form, none of them specify clearly on long run and short run model.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then get the Pesaran, Shin and Smith (1995, 1997, 1999) papers...available on the internet.

    • @nawalin12
      @nawalin12 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix I did, I have all of them, and make it as my main sources, read it many times.. but no explanation on short run and long run model.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Read again. They developed the model. They are the ones we cite for panel ARDL. Adapt what they did to yours.

  • @kazikssss
    @kazikssss ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @CrunchEconometrix why didnt you mention that it is vital to check for cross-sectional dependence before moving to the unit root test ?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  ปีที่แล้ว

      Jan, now you know may I understand what your issues are?

    • @kazikssss
      @kazikssss ปีที่แล้ว

      @CrunchEconometrix I'm just asking is there some kind of rationale behind why you haven't mentioned this ? As far as I know in order to conduct panel ardl you need to always check for cross sectional dependence.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  ปีที่แล้ว

      Jan, there's no rationale.

    • @kazikssss
      @kazikssss ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix so if a cross sectional dependence is found the panel ardl is unreliable as far as i understand ?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  ปีที่แล้ว

      Jan, your query shows you are yet to fully understand the intricacies of pabel ARDL. I have always emphasised that video tutorials are insufficient due to situations like this. Please find the time to read published articles that used panel ARDL to support whatever you gained from watching my video. I have listed some papers at the end of the clips. Best regards.

  • @md.mahfujurrahman864
    @md.mahfujurrahman864 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks...basically first 2 min awesome

  • @clarajoanjoachim2179
    @clarajoanjoachim2179 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello prof, I can't seem to understand the difference between subscript i and j in the generalized model. In the model, you showed that coefficient of lagged dependent variable has only subscript i, but in the explanation, there is both i and j. Could you explain that, please? thank you.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  ปีที่แล้ว

      Clara, I suggest you pick up any article that used panel ARDL and read up on the Methodology Section. That will help you understand the generalised equation.

  • @HibaWorld
    @HibaWorld 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this informative video. I have a question. I have T>N (T=168 and N=28). My data is an unbalanced panel with one independent variable non-stationary and stationary after first differencing. I used PMG which turns out to be good after the Hausman test. However, I read that PMG doesn't account for cross-sectional dependencies and the option should be xtdcce2 model as it can test for cross-sectional dependencies using xtcd2. It should work with unbalanced data but it's not working. Wondering do you have any suggestion?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Nadia, thanks for the encouraging feedback. Deeply appreciated! You are right with all points raised. Why is the xtdcce2 syntax not working?

    • @HibaWorld
      @HibaWorld 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@CrunchEconometrix Hi it worked I had a row in my data which had missing value so after dropping it everything working.

  • @emregokceli5087
    @emregokceli5087 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Prof. Thank you for the video.
    I have just a quick question. Should the dependent variable be non-stationary at level and stationary at I (1) to be able to use Panle ARDL?
    Thank you.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Emre, I should what is required in these panel ARDL videos.

  • @oloyedeobagbuwa3790
    @oloyedeobagbuwa3790 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dear Dr,
    I need your counsel again. I have panel data with large N (181 firms) and small T (16) and I want to confirm if I can use P ARDL. I will equally appreciate it if you can suggest possible models. I am looking at the effects of independent variables on the dependent variable both in the short and long run. My variables are stationary at level.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Oloyede, since N > T, applicable techniques are pooled OLS, LSDV, FE, RE, and GMM. Panel ARDL is applicable when N < T. Thanks.

  • @fulyaozorhan2900
    @fulyaozorhan2900 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you have a video on panel ARDL estimation by using eviews? I cannot find any in your channel.(There is only one with the STATA version.) Thanks

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi Fulya, the EViews platform is a bit complicated for me regarding panel data analysis. I'm still learning the interface. Once I'm confident, I'll replicate all my Stata panel data videos. Thanks for watching and keep sharing too! 💕 😊

  • @elinakim6349
    @elinakim6349 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dr. Ngozi, please, would panel ARDL be applicable for a panel data set with existence of cross sectional dependence?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, because the econometric construct is in 1st difference.

    • @elinakim6349
      @elinakim6349 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix Thank you!

  • @lakurelabpradeeppanthi2257
    @lakurelabpradeeppanthi2257 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it necessary to have ECT always negative and significant? What if we get negative ECT coefficient but insignificant? IF ECT is not significant, but individual long-run coefficient is significant than can we consider them as long-run causality? What do you mean by joint causality? If ECT comes negative and significant but all individual regressors become insignificant then at that condition how should we conclude?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Pradeep, these are very easy to interpret. An insignificant coefficient has no impact on the outcome variable. Long-run causality can be inferred when the long-run coeffs are significant. Joint causality can be inferred when the ECT is significant. Kindly watch my causality videos for more understanding.

  • @dusandrljaca1492
    @dusandrljaca1492 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dear, How to perform JB test and test for kurtosis and skewness in stata for panel data analysis? Is there any specific test for panel data or it is enough to set panel and specify model and then use classic tests (sktest) ?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dusan, I have not done the JB test using Stata but you can try out your suggestion.

  • @emmanuelsenior1191
    @emmanuelsenior1191 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good display. Please how do I resolve the issue of near singular matrix aside dropping variables. I tried running panel ARDL estimation but I keep getting near singular matrix even after dropping almost all my independent variables

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  ปีที่แล้ว

      Emmanuel, with panel ARDL the correlation has to do with the underlying lags of the independent variables. I suggest you use 0 lag for the regressors and 1 lag for the lagged depvar just as I did in the video. The lag structure is (1 0 0 0).

    • @emmanuelsenior1191
      @emmanuelsenior1191 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix thank you very much Dr. for the response I would apply that

    • @emmanuelsenior1191
      @emmanuelsenior1191 ปีที่แล้ว

      I tried that but there's no option for 0 lag for regressors so I set both for 1. Still near singular matrix

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  ปีที่แล้ว

      Emmanuel, are you using EViews or Stata?

    • @emmanuelsenior1191
      @emmanuelsenior1191 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix Dr. please am using E-views

  • @dejeneadugna7534
    @dejeneadugna7534 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When our variables have different lag length ,how we specify the command while using ARDl_PMG? thank you

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Degene, due to multicollinearity, I restrict to using 1,0,0,0 lag length.

  • @ndouniamaonionguivanbrenta8618
    @ndouniamaonionguivanbrenta8618 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much Sir. How to take the Hausman test in an ARDL? To my knowledge, the Hausman test is done with MCO. However, ARDL is another method that we use in spite of MCO. And I think the use of the Hausman test has no place in the ARDL model. And thank you for your answer Sir.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ndouniama, it is advisable to watch my videos before posting your queries which are now becoming incessantly irrelevant. I have videos on ARDL and also on the Hausman test. Watch them, read the listed references at the end of the videos and STOP 🛑 confusing yourself and anyone reading your queries. This is my honest advice to you. Take them to enable you get the best out of my TH-cam Channel. Please know that I won't respond to any irrelevant query from you. Thanks.

    • @ndouniamaonionguivanbrenta8618
      @ndouniamaonionguivanbrenta8618 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix Thanks Sir!

  • @berkpalandokenlier2358
    @berkpalandokenlier2358 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello there. First of all, thank you very much for this explanatory and useful video. You explained it very beautifully and clearly. There was a question I was wondering about myself. At least how many arguments are required for panel ARDL. Would it be 5 or 6 more? Or less? Thank you.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Berk, thanks for the positive feedback. What is implied by "arguments"?

    • @berkpalandokenlier2358
      @berkpalandokenlier2358 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@CrunchEconometrix Sorry. I mean the number of explanatory (or independent variables. How many variables can be used at most? 6 or 7 variables possible?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is no direct response to this. You can find out when you run several simulations.

  • @moviesanddramakorea
    @moviesanddramakorea ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Prof, I ran a slope homegenity test for my variables after running a unit root test, i.e, I ran the slope homogeneity test on the I(1) of my variables since they were stationary at first difference, therefore I am going with PMG estimator, is this okay Prof?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Kezia, please read more about the slope homogeneity test to be certain that it's a prerequisite for the PMG analysis. Thanks

  • @vheektorig1444
    @vheektorig1444 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi prof... Your videos are highly educative. Thanks alot. I've subscribed.
    Please, I need ur urgent opinion... If I have my N to be 20firms and T to be 6years with 3 independent and 3 dependent variables, what's the best methodology under panel to use...
    Referral materials to assist me to build panel models in this line would be appreciated. Thanks in anticipation ma.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Vic, thanks for the positive feedback and your subscription. Deeply appreciated! Watch my videos on Hausman test, FE and RE, GMM, Error Component Models and Sub-Samples Analysis. Support them with references provided at the end of the videos. Thanks.

    • @vheektorig1444
      @vheektorig1444 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix
      Thanks alot ma

  • @afreenessani9534
    @afreenessani9534 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, I really liked your video of importing panel data. However, my concern is to learn how to import time series data in eviews, I.e. is it the same way or is it a bit different? Also, I need to run longitudinal causality on that data, can you help me a bit in that matter? Thanks in advance. Love, Afreen.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Afreen, thanks for giving my video a good pass😊...and yes I have a video on how to import time series data into EViews. Simply click on the EViews Playlist to search for the video. I also have videos on causality in Stata and EViews you can check them out. It's basically the same procedure and interpretation.

  • @Dr_Shiny
    @Dr_Shiny 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hats off Dear ma'am Professor,
    Need your help...
    I have T=41, N=16, i.e. T>N.
    1- Data have both Heteroscadescity and Autocorrelation
    2- From 7 Independent Variables, 4 variables are stationary at the level and 3 stationary at 1st difference
    3- there is cross-sectional dependence
    Ma'am, Would you recommend Panel ARDL model in this scenario ?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rain-Walker, it is obvious that you have not watched any of my panel data videos. Otherwise, you'd know that your data structure is a misfit for panel ARDL. I'll advise you watch ALL my videos on TIPS TO BUILDING PANEL DATA, FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS, and GMM series for better understanding. Thanks

  • @lakurelabpradeeppanthi2257
    @lakurelabpradeeppanthi2257 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    why the cointegration test is optional in Panel ARDL?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Because the significance of the ECT evidences cointegration.

  • @nssofod
    @nssofod 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you ma'am for such a nice and lucid explanation. I hv a query.
    I hv data where N=5, T=25 and 5 variables. I want find the relationship between growth and remittances. Is it worth to apply dynamic panel ardl model? My variables are stationary at 1st difference.
    Thanks in advance.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Debasis, I suggest that you increase the number of observations to over 30 given you have 5 variables to avoid loss of too many degrees of freedom.

    • @nssofod
      @nssofod 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix that means T>30?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes.

    • @nssofod
      @nssofod 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix thanks a lot madam

  • @reinagiovanni
    @reinagiovanni 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi Prof! What if i have a variable that requires the second difference?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      With I(2) variable, not sure if panel ARDL is a suitable technique.

  • @bbouchra1000
    @bbouchra1000 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much. It was so helpful

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      U're very welcome. Please may I know from where (location) you are reaching me?

    • @bbouchra1000
      @bbouchra1000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix from Morocco

    • @bbouchra1000
      @bbouchra1000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix please one more question. Could we introduce control variables in this model in order to attenuate potential omitted variable bias ? If yes how could we do?
      Thank you in advance 🙏

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @بشرى **** Control variables are explanatory variables which can be included. Kindly watch the practical application to see the process. Thanks.

    • @bbouchra1000
      @bbouchra1000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix thank you so much .. we are learning a lot from your channel

  • @megadwicahyani3370
    @megadwicahyani3370 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello thank you, your video is very helpful. But I want to ask, so if we use heterogeneous panel data we can’t do the panel ardl? Because the data can’t be estimated in random effects while the panel ardl requires a hausman test?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Mega thanks for watching my video but I'm not quite getting your query because heterogeneous panel data is estimated by panel ARDL. Unless I'm missing something in your query.

  • @dusandrljaca1492
    @dusandrljaca1492 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it possible to use Kao test of cointegration in ARDL panel? Is it required with Pedroni test of cointegration that all statistics have to be lower than 0.05 in order to conclude that there is cointegration in panel data? Is it required to use some test for autocorrelation in ARDL panel model?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dusan, my practical panel ARDL videos address some of your questions. Support that with reading published articles that used the technique. Thanks.

  • @yoursjeffery
    @yoursjeffery 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good day ma, Please how do I deal with panel data where variables have different orders of integration as inferred by the unit root test-I(0) (stationary at level), I(1) (stationary after first differencing), and I(2) (stationary after second differencing)?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You can deploy PCSE and FGLS techniques.

    • @yoursjeffery
      @yoursjeffery 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix thank you ma

  • @yuldoshboysobirov9580
    @yuldoshboysobirov9580 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello, I have several questions.
    1. Can panel ARDL PMG approach automatically defines the lags or should we employ lag selection?
    2. Can we employ Panel ARDL without cointegration tests? Or are they mandatory?
    Thanks for your responses!

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Yuldoshboy, thanks for the queries. I addressed them all in the hands-on videos. Kindly watch them, thanks.

  • @ngusbekele2920
    @ngusbekele2920 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is that possible to use panel ARDL if the number of observation(N) is greater than the time period (T)

  • @mehmetakyol4332
    @mehmetakyol4332 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dear professor,
    I have a trouble about cointegration test. In my panel data variables depvar is I(1) and indep var is I(0). Can I use Westerlund cointegration test before performing pmg and mg? In some articles it implies that in that kind of stiation durbin hausman cointegration or bound test (f test) have to use to determine cointegraiton. I am really confused. Could you please kindly response . Thank you very much

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Mehmet, you may follow the explanations I gave regarding cointegration in panel ARDL. Thanks.

  • @asfiabinteosman5303
    @asfiabinteosman5303 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Professor, is it possible to run a panel data using 11 years data of 4 banks? Need your help. Please do answer

  • @aminaahmedalibelal5676
    @aminaahmedalibelal5676 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi. Can we use ARDL in case of LARGE panel data?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Amina, kindly watch my videos on Panel ARDL for guidance. Thanks

  • @ndouniamaonionguivanbrenta8618
    @ndouniamaonionguivanbrenta8618 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please Sir, why the diagnosis on the ARDL panel is not an obligation? I can't wait for your answer please Sir!

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I explained that in the respective clip.

    • @ndouniamaonionguivanbrenta8618
      @ndouniamaonionguivanbrenta8618 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix Thank you for your positive feedback Sir. I am sure you are competent. Please can you send me the link of said video Sir? Sorry for the inconvenience Sir!

  • @yassinyahia2453
    @yassinyahia2453 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Prof. Ngozi. Thank you very much for your continuous and valuable videos. I current working paper has a PMG result. My dependent variable is the manufacturing value-added (%GDP) (MVA), while the independent variable is intra-export (. xtpmg d.lmva3 d.linex d.lhli d.lint d.lhdi d.lfd, lr(l.lmva3 linex lhli lint lhdi lfd) ec(ec) replace pmg). The intra-export (EXT) has a positive and significant effect on the MVA. However, when I used the GMM (xtabond2), or xtpcse, or xtgls, the coefficient of the independent var (EXT) was either negative and significant or positive but insignificant, which did not support the baseline result (positive and significant)!!!. Would you help?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yassin, it is not unexpected that different techniques yield different results. It is up to you to decide which way to go.

  • @emregokceli5087
    @emregokceli5087 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Sir, if N>T, then could l use panel ARDL ?
    Thanks

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Emre, no.

    • @emregokceli5087
      @emregokceli5087 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix thank your for your reply. Could you suggest a method for panel data in which N>T ?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Emre, FE, RE, GMM, IV-GMM, PSCC, and Pooled OLS.

  • @akhliddinismailov3766
    @akhliddinismailov3766 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Professor, how to include the lagged values to panel ARDL model?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Watch the entire series. I showed what to do.

  • @evaggeliasiopi4746
    @evaggeliasiopi4746 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Professor i have a panel data with with N> T, N=16,T=1 and i want to use 6 independent variables and 2 dummies wicth is the best model can i use ?Thanks in advance.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Eva, you can decide after watching my videos on fixed and random effects, and GMM. But T = 1?

    • @evaggeliasiopi4746
      @evaggeliasiopi4746 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix Τ=11 sorry thanks a lot

  • @gynendrabhandari1106
    @gynendrabhandari1106 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    please provide the literature source for the ardl panel data with T>>N

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi Gyendra, I listed references at the end of the video.

    • @gynendrabhandari1106
      @gynendrabhandari1106 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix thanks

  • @tareklakhloufi3000
    @tareklakhloufi3000 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello,
    I need your advice, regarding the choice of the suitable method in this panel study
    T = 5
    N = 6
    Number of variables: 5
    thank you in advance

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Tarek, no meaningful panel analysis can be done with this except pooled OLS which conveys very little information. Either you make N excessively larger than T and perform FE, RE and GMM techniques or T excessively larger than N and perform panel ARDL. I have videos on these techniques, kindly watch them. May I know from where (location) you are reaching me?

    • @tareklakhloufi3000
      @tareklakhloufi3000 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix i m form morocco,
      with OLS can i know the effect of each N

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tareklakhloufi3000 Nah, you can't. That'll work under panel ARDL approach.

    • @tareklakhloufi3000
      @tareklakhloufi3000 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix what is the most suitable panel approach to these properietes:
      N: 6
      T: 5

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tareklakhloufi3000 Kindly refer to my 1st response.

  • @infoknowledge2871
    @infoknowledge2871 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    should i use original data or differenced data in testing for ardl model or ardl bound testing as my all variables become stationary at I(1)?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Watch my videos to see what I did. thanks.

  • @dr.elkhanrichardzada9855
    @dr.elkhanrichardzada9855 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you know whether there is a stata command for panel NARDL?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Dr. Zada, perhaps...can't really say. I've never had cause to perform the procedure. May I know from where (location) you are reaching me?

  • @asanteka.2403
    @asanteka.2403 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    My Dear Prof, i have a doubt which just came to my mind. In an econometric specification can we interact a variable at levels with another one (in growth rate)?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Asanke, maybe. Could be possible if there is a relationship to investigate.

    • @asanteka.2403
      @asanteka.2403 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix thanks my dear prof

  • @muhammadkamrankhan5766
    @muhammadkamrankhan5766 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How many obervations need to apply Panel ARDL model. Time series ARDL need 30 observation.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Muhd, it's the same as in TS ARDL ...at least 30years obs

  • @noora3195
    @noora3195 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    very useful video .. thank you but I have a question why the diagnostic tests are optional ? I run PMG which was chooses according to Housman test and the results were significant and alien with my expectation .but still want to support my model with some diagnostic test . can you please help me with this ? shall I do diagnostic test for each country data ? what if I found heteroscadasity or serial correlation or cross dependence ? does this imply that model is not right

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Noor, diagnostics are optional in the sense that in panel data analysis heteroscedasticity and serial correlation are not issues but you may test for CSD if you wish. I don't know how that is done so you can seek more online resources on how to proceed. Thanks.

  • @tundeomotehinse514
    @tundeomotehinse514 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If I have 42 firms with 10 years of performance. Can I use this model

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Tunde, no you cannot. You may want to check out my videos on FE, RE and GMM. Thanks

    • @tundeomotehinse514
      @tundeomotehinse514 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is the solution?

    • @tundeomotehinse514
      @tundeomotehinse514 ปีที่แล้ว

      But you used 13yrs and 143 countries, why is my own not appropriate?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  ปีที่แล้ว

      No, I didn't. This clip is about Panel ARDL.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tundeomotehinse514 I responded to you on suggested techniques.

  • @moonsafar5718
    @moonsafar5718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi prof, I have panel data T=340, N= 11, There is cross section dependency error and the stationary of variables is mix i(1) i(0), have 5 independant variabels and one dep varabels, can I run Panel ARDL or not, thanks in advanced ?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You mean that you have 340 years?

    • @moonsafar5718
      @moonsafar5718 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix thank you prof.10 years with four quarters.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Some augmentation of the panel ARDL estimators account for CSD. You can check out the other online resources.

    • @moonsafar5718
      @moonsafar5718 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix could you please direct me to specific research ❤❤❤

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are several articles. Just do a Google search.

  • @rahmanakbi1905
    @rahmanakbi1905 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Sir ,
    I am Rahma, a sophomore at the University of Monastir, Mahdia, Tunisia. The problem is that my database includes 30 African countries from 1980 to 2017. But how can I estimate the ARDL dans Eviews 10 model?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Rahma, you have a large panel data. Unfortunately, I have panel ARDL videos in Stata and not EViews.

    • @rahmanakbi1905
      @rahmanakbi1905 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix I watched his videos on STATA and EVIEWS. But I found that my database has missing variables.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rahmanakbi1905 Aside from the missing values, you have a large panel data which makes panel ARDL (pARDL) technique to be not applicable. To use pARDL, T must be considerably larger than N.

    • @mounaamari1752
      @mounaamari1752 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix You are excellent nd your videos are veryy very helpful please have you an idea about thresholds commands in stata 13?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mounaamari1752 Thanks for the positive feedback and words of encouragement. Deeply appreciated! Not sure about the Threshold regression routine in Stata13 (never tried it yet). But you can find out by typing "help threshold" in the command window. Please may I know from where (location) you are reaching me?

  • @hudamajid2842
    @hudamajid2842 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    i would like to ask can i use this test for my master thesis? i want to test if there is a relationship between poverty and economic growth? which test should i use. thank you

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hi Huda, that will depend on whether it's a time series or panel study. Kindly check my Playlists because I have models and estimators that addresses both. Thanks!

  • @chathuricaldera637
    @chathuricaldera637 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can I get fixed and random effect models to level data when data are stationary at first difference(Has unit root for level data)

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You cannot use RE or FE estimators on longitudinal panel data.

  • @muhamamdmoeezraza2773
    @muhamamdmoeezraza2773 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    need a guideline in estimation of panel data

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Muhd, I have videos on panel data analysis using Stata and EViews. Kindly watch them for better understanding. Thanks.

  • @edgarndani5238
    @edgarndani5238 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    how do you clean and winsorize a panel data?

  • @Dr_Shiny
    @Dr_Shiny 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi professor,
    Please suggest me suitable "panel model"
    The time period of my data is from 2008-Q4 to 2018-Q4, Total 16 Banks, more than 16 variables. These 16 banks belong to three groups i.e. 5-Big five, 8 national joint-stock commercial banks, 3 City commercial Banks.
    Dependent variables are the log of the number of Wealth Management Products issued by these 16 banks, and Independent Variables includes "Size, Profitability, Liquidity, Capital, and Leverage Ratios", with GDP growth & inflation as macro variables.
    Thank you Ma'am Professor
    Kind Regards

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      16 variables are too many. Reduce to 4 or 5, if possible.

  • @abdelhadibenghalem1332
    @abdelhadibenghalem1332 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear dr. Bosede Ngozi Adeleye, I'm a beginner Ph.D. student from Algeria and i really need your help, I am working on a balanced panel data which include: N: 8 & T: 12. my question is: What is the suitable model that I should use?
    please accept my sincere salutations.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Abdelhadi, you are watching the exact video series that relates to the suitable model. Watch all and follow my procedures, do not skip any. Thanks.

    • @abdelhadibenghalem1332
      @abdelhadibenghalem1332 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dear@@CrunchEconometrix I Am watching right now thank you so much.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Abdelhadi, I forgot to add that T must not be less than 30 to avoid small sample bias.

    • @abdelhadibenghalem1332
      @abdelhadibenghalem1332 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix thank you again in my case of study the maximum of T is 12 so please what would you propose to me?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@abdelhadibenghalem1332 You can convert to quarterly data to increase the sample size to 48 observations per country. Seek further online resources on how to do this.

  • @ghazalaafzal6049
    @ghazalaafzal6049 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hello, can you plz tell me , can we use ARDL model on Unbalanced panel data?

  • @mohamedalhwary8841
    @mohamedalhwary8841 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    hello, How can I add a macro economic variables to set of firms data? (Panel data-Cross sectional).

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Mohamed, add them the same way others are added. Watch my videos to see my data structure.

    • @mohamedalhwary8841
      @mohamedalhwary8841 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@CrunchEconometrix Thanks Dr for your reply, but Isn't there any problem causes by repeating the same macro inputs for the firms?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You only want to add explanatory variables, not so?

    • @mohamedalhwary8841
      @mohamedalhwary8841 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@CrunchEconometrix No doctor, I want to add a new column, to the variable of each company, related to the macro economy like the exchange rate, the exchange rate is repeated within the same period for all companies.
      Company A: Sales(a) - Profits(a) - Exchange rate (in the periode).
      Company b: Sales(b) - Profits(b) - Exchange rate (in the periode).

    • @mohamedalhwary8841
      @mohamedalhwary8841 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thus, I have recurring variables within each company’s Panel data. These data are macroeconomics and create correlation between variables and cause Matrix error inside Eviews.

  • @rahmanakbi1905
    @rahmanakbi1905 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello sir;
    I am a student in 2 years of Master in Research of the Faculty of Economics and Management of Mahdia. I have an annual database of 30 countries from 1980 to 2017. I apply the ARDL approach for this database. My problem is that the command of the ARDL is not correct (the command I use: forval i = 1/30 {
    ardl my variables, maxlags (p, q ......)
    matrix list e (delay)
    di
    })
    The results are "no observations" why
    What is the problem with this command? help me
    STATA 15

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Rahma, for panel ARDL, N must be very small. So, reduce the 30 countries to about 10...and re-estimate the model. May I know from where (location) you are reaching me?

  • @soufianemahjoubi5758
    @soufianemahjoubi5758 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If N>T. Ardl panel data estimate for this case or no??

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Mahjoubi, as I explained in the video the answer is NO.

    • @soufianemahjoubi5758
      @soufianemahjoubi5758 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix hello, please tell me how to estimate mean
      group estimator (MG), pooled mean group (PMG) and dynamic fixed effects (DFE) in eviews

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm yet to understand how to engage these in EViews. Stata is more robust for panel data analysis.

    • @soufianemahjoubi5758
      @soufianemahjoubi5758 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix you say on short ardl panel data we can use large N and Small T

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, I didn't say that. Watch my panel ARDL videos again. I gave very clear explanations.

  • @nssofod
    @nssofod 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear madam,
    I hv a panel with t=27 and n=5. Having dynamic heterogeneous cross sectional dependence can I apply CS-ardl? Bcz in some papers I found this model is applied for large panels. If this is true which model is suitable to tackle all these issues of dynamic heterogeneity and CSD given that I hv both I(0) and I(1) but no I(2)? Plz comment.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Debasis, the technique you suggested is ok. Same for CCE-MG, CCE, DCCE-MG, AMG, GLS, and PCSE. I advise you do further readings on these.

    • @nssofod
      @nssofod 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix thanks a lot

    • @nssofod
      @nssofod 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrunchEconometrix if possible plz make a video on cs-ardl and related issues

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's on my to-do-list. Thanks!

    • @nssofod
      @nssofod 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dear madam,
      My hausman test favouring MG but the results of PMG are better. I am applying panel ARDL. Is there any flaw in my model specification?

  • @everythingnyimbo
    @everythingnyimbo 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    you said Long Panel: Large N, Large T, is it not Large T, Small N?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Large N and T panel is an extreme of a long panel. Note that the T is long.