Can you do a video on all these new wild guns laws the state of Michigan has passed in the past 2 years. No one is talking about the red flag laws that Governor whitmer and Democrats have rushed threw and passed and the fact NONE of the local police,county nor state police won't go against for unconstitutionalality... It's pretty sad even the MSP are lock step with these horrible new laws...
just make them personally pay back the government for the legal costs of the losing court battle. They'd all start being a lot more careful about passing laws.
It doesn't matter what the Supreme Court rules on anything if the federal government doesn't force states to obey those decisions. Illinois is a perfect example of this.
@@whodoyouthinkiam210 sort of hard to comment on youtube otherwise sherlock sht brain just be happy we aren't standing face to face, because you sure as hell wouldnt be standing for long .... then again, nothing like a beta male who hides behind a fake name/fake profile like a coward
@@CopperCooper420It's hard to count all the way to 242. Also 241 and 246 have been violated in recent news. But let's count how many have taken such charges...
When i can order a brand new full auto machine gun from a catalog and the mail man delivers it to my front door like my great grand father did ill be happy.
That’s when all this started to happen albeit slowly, in the early 30 s I don’t think sears catalog has those anymore , the word “ safety “ has been used for decades and century’s
@@deborahhargrove3710 you're all talk you don't do shit about it and it just a fantasy that's never going to happen for you ,,😭 Why are people like this.
This whole thing appears to be a "POLITICAL HOT POTATO" that courts do not want to deal with! Even SCOTUS did not go far enough by denying the authority of states, agencies or cities to place ANY RESTRICTIONS ON 2ND AMEMDMENT RIGHTS!
They understand it just fine, they just don't care. No one stops them and they can do whatever they want, so that's exactly what they do. Many such cases.
MANY CITIZENS IN NY KNOW WHAT THEIR RIGHTS ARE BUT THE PERPS IN AUTHORITY IN NY GOVERNMENT... NEED TO LEGALLY BE MADE FULLY EDUCATED BY THE HARSHIST LEGAL PENALTIES ...
Amendment II A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
My thoughts also. The thing is that communists doesnt want their subjects to be armed because they fear that we might use our weapons against them. That people dies because they cant defend themselves from violent crimes is nothing the political elite ever will consider. Because our goverments in the entire western world hates and despise their own people.
Never going to happen because Republicans need an issue to browbeat their constituents into voting and donating. One of the most divisive issues that always brings the money in is gun rights. That's why Republicans and the NRA would often work against gun rights to help make a problem they could later claim to solve if only you would vote for them. It's called the hegelian dialectic, the powerful create a problem then offer you the solution pushing you always towards where they want you to be.
And states only abide by the U.S. Constitution when it further their cause. Seems pointless to have a Federal Constitution if states do as they please.
as a new yorker who started hunting a year ago. i have really ben enlightened to the laws here and have a deep seated hatred for the stupidity of the laws here. i'm fortunate that my buddy brings a spare rifle but living in the city and getting a rifle permit (not required anywhere else in the state) is assenine moreover the price of applying for the permit and waiting times are major deterrents to even wanting to...... and the same is even more so for anyone who wants a pistol! its even more expensive and difficult to get a permit to carry a pistol. mind you i am a model citizen i pay my taxes i work i do not have a record and i practice safe gun handling when i using one yet it is near impossible for me to get one in a timely manner. i literally cannot have a gun before the spring hunting season opens up and not even by the time general deer season opens up bc it takes so long to process. furthermore i want to go on a public land hunt and want to carry a firearm for protection in case i encounter bears (unlikely but u never know) and i wouldnt even be able to do that for a year and change. again not mentioning the amount of money this will set me back just to apply for the damn paperwork and prints!
I know it sucks but for right now u gotta pay to play I had too and the only thing that I think sucks which I hope they fix is the NYC. Vs the rest of the state where an nyc cc can get u the whole state vs. the rest cc license doesn’t work in. NYC that’s just stupid. Glad I got the NYC but they act like A Licensce is not a licensce
I appreciate that he is keeping people informed. Unfortunately he puts out one video per day and 99% of the material is repeated information. It becomes droning and loses effectiveness to a lot of the listeners. Viewer engagement is also hampered by his overly methodical speech patterns. I appreciate the fact he is trying to be precise in what he says but it’s become very difficult to listen to. If he really has updates when he says there are updates it would be easier. But to hear an update video that’s not an update why call it one? At times it’s like listening to the adults in Peanuts.
private property.... carry it in my business, im within my rights to disarm you and have you arrested or simply empty a mag in your a z z for being a potential armed robber and anywhere there is alcohol served... you can't have a weapon or its a federal offense
Isn't there a rule about "judicial foot dragging?" This is obviously the result of a lack of accountability and checks and balances within the judiciary. Reform, anyone?
This whole court to court thing is very frustrating. It makes no sense at all that your Constitutional rights vary depending on what state you live in. Think about the millions of people that gave their lives for our freedom, and how in some states it was completely in vain. It's really sad.
Our rights are enforced in this country as a whole. Why are we not allowed to carry anywhere? Why are there boundaries allowed if it is a right? How ,lawfully, can your rights ever be restricted if they are rights?
It's all treasonous acts against the people.. woe unto you lawmakers.. it is written... Your rights cannot be infringed upon...but they are doing it ..
Because States seem to think their laws outweigh federal laws. Kinda like states making marijuana legal but in reality the federal government could come to your house and arrest you for possession or growing if that's your thing.
Because States seem to think their laws outweigh federal government laws. Kinda like marijuana is still federally illegal and yes if you are growing or even in possession you can be arrested and property seized by the Fed's. I have this discussion with people all the time and they believe because it is legal in the state the Fed's have no authority. Well they would be wrong for thinking that.
When people dont follow a law, they have to pay the consequences, when a state doesn't want to follow a law, the people have to pay the consequences. Make them pay the consequences and be held responsible. I guarantee we'd hear from them a lot less
I was going through some old Playboys from the 70's and 80's. There was an ad to order a mail order firearm. I was tempted to send a money order to the address just to see what would happen.
@@professionalpookie Like I said, I was TEMPTED. In all seriousness, I'd have to consult an attorney before pulling a stunt like that. There are even dumber laws on the books right now and I could see ATF showing up at my door and arresting me some obscure California law I am ignorant to. I have too much to lose, but if you don't, I am glad to send you a copy of the ad.
@professionalpookie you're missing the point. I bet you get caught up on punctuation mistakes too? This is the moment I start ignoring you because you aren't here for discourse, you're here to be a pest.
Love the content....one suggestion......a brief recap/summary of the video would be nice towards the end to help us (non-attorney types) capture the overall message. Thanks for what you do. Keep up the great work!
he won't do that because that is all anyone would watch because we're sick of him blabbering on and it would cost him precious viewed minutes which is lost revenue and he makes more money doing this than he does as a lawyer. i mean do you not notice how every video is within a specific time frame. he does everything he can to maximize revenue.
I agree, I appreciate what he’s doing but a layman’s terms section or even definitions on screen would be more appreciated by viewers imo. At the very least I can appreciate that these videos are historic documentation for the BS trying to be pulled to remove the rights of the people.
States and local governments explicitly do not have the right or jurisdiction to enforce anything having to do with weapons or the use or carry of weapons. That all falls under federal jurisdiction because that is a federally enumerated right and federal law. Allowing state and local governments to change and modify our rights and forcing citizens to assert their rights in court costing 10's or 100's of thousands of dollars, jail time or even costing their lives to do so is not legal. It is criminal. In order for the Constitution to be law and for the bill of rights to be law, they must be congruent on every square inch of US owned territory. PERIOD.
When in 1871 they changed the constitution.. they made DC a district it's not a state.. it's the war power.. it's a foreign entity. Another district is city of London it's the financial power Another district is the Vatican it's the religious power.
When in 1871 they changed the constitution.. they made DC a district it's not a state.. it's the war power.. it's a foreign entity. Another district is city of London it's the financial power Another district is the Vatican it's the religious power.
Jesus christ,have mercy on us,I'm blad I left NY 6byears ago for PA and now learning where I will stay my last stand as a 35 years old building his wealth and empire.
It doesn't matter. The SC rules against them, their legislatures just pass the same law but slightly different from the one struck down. Then they enforce it while it takes another decade for the courts to strike down the new law. Then when they do, it's rinse/repeat. The state legislature passes the same law, again slightly changed, and the legal process starts all over again.
How is denying people their constitutional rights not a crime? Any legislator drafting or voting for such a law should be charged. Any Governor signing a bill denying constitutional rights should be removed, and charged.
Funny how connected parties NEVER had a problem getting a permit especially if you had the money. In NYC there were only 4 ways. 1) You applied, got denied, sued and 10k later you got it, 2) You paid off the right people at the permit division (Jews getting permit scheme a few years ago). 3) Current Fire Department. 4) LEO Retire in good standing. Law biding citizens, forget it. Oh your gun's serial is on your permit. More then 1 gun go show the local PCT your safe for approval .
All these judges should have to pass a reading comprehension test, and thereafter be held to it. The problem is that there is no accountability when government scumbags ignore their oath to UPHOLD the Constitution, which would PRECLUDE ignoring it, given that they passed the reading test in order to get the job..
Is there anything that a good citizen can do to exercise our 2nd Amendment rights in NY or must we assert our rights and risk going to Jail for the sake of our constitution and failure of the Supreme Court of The United States to issue a ruling that is clear understandable and enforced by the U.S.Marshalls or the President issues an order to protect the people from tyranny.
NY state has got to be held to account for its heinous disregard of the law. They can’t make laws to circumvent the very constitution they claim to follow. People should be winning lawsuit after lawsuit ad infinitum with the way things are, the state is blatantly depriving people of rights.
Maybe I don't understand how the court system works, but why can't SCOTUS just say, once a case reaches them, that the state's law is null and void on Constitutional grounds, and that's final? Why do they have to remand it to a lower court?
Why are judges on federal courts who have decisions reversed still allowed to serve? Their judgment is proven to be flawed so they should be dismissed and not allowed to 'serve' again.
Would this court case be holding a permit application up in the state of New York? I’ve submitted my application in September of 2024 and haven’t seen any movement on my application.
I live in the beautiful Upstate NY area and I am sick of this PIS governor wasting my money via taxes on unconstitutional gun laws. SCOTUS needs to uphold the Constitution in absolute and forbid any gun control "laws". Hochul and the likes of her need to be removed. I can't wait until she resigns, or arrested or voted out. I'm also a big fan of separating from NYC.
Asking permission to protect your family and self outside of the home Is absolutely dog shit. Any tyrant fudd who claims other wise should rethink their position. (I can think of a few Sheriff)
So ok I have a question that I have been curious about for a while now. All these states ignore and disregard the SCOTUS decisions, so what recourse is there for someone or a state or municipality that doesn’t abide by the decisions?
I am going to be realistic. A problem comes in with the right of the state to protect its citizens. The states problem comes in with the citizens' right to bear arms, which means you don't need a permit. The most likely result I can see coming from the Supreme Court is national concealed carry. Concealed carrying. In my opinion, national concealed carry would come under the context of prohibition of interference with interstate comerace. In that people should have a right to protect them themselves while conducting business in the state, such as spending on vacationing etc.
At this point, it is all just fun and games. Meanwhile the black robes in DC continue to be mocked by the lower courts. The robes in DC don't seem to care. They are too busy because they are partying like it's 1860.
Who interprets the constitution? Is the constitution written so the common person can interpret it! Is the government, regulated or are the people regulated? Are the restrictions in the constitution for the government or the people? Sovereignty is for the people or the government?
They want your water rights because water burning engines are coming. it's stupid to not have them already! you get twice the horsepower with no emissions.
Question: Illinois NRA supported and ushered thru Concealed Carry Permit Structure outright criminalizes all public carriage for all but peace officers and then the purchased permission slips create a class of people exempt from the blanket prohibition. Open carry remains 100% prohibited as a result. That said, are other states carry permit structures this same way? Got Prior Restraint based on the interest balancing approach premise? Oopsie.
Check out our sponsor 1st Phorm: 1stphorm.com/armedscholar-bow
Can you do a video on all these new wild guns laws the state of Michigan has passed in the past 2 years. No one is talking about the red flag laws that Governor whitmer and Democrats have rushed threw and passed and the fact NONE of the local police,county nor state police won't go against for unconstitutionalality... It's pretty sad even the MSP are lock step with these horrible new laws...
State legislators need to start facing federal charges for knowingly and willingly passing legislation in opposition to supreme court decisions.
just make them personally pay back the government for the legal costs of the losing court battle. They'd all start being a lot more careful about passing laws.
Politicians need to face Treason charges for passing or attempting to pass laws that violate the 2nd Amendment.
You mean like any restriction more restrictive than what's described in the 2A?
Mandatory loss of sovereign immunity for passing a law deemed unconstitutional.
@@LGB-FJB i suppose that is a fair initial argument.
It doesn't matter what the Supreme Court rules on anything if the federal government doesn't force states to obey those decisions. Illinois is a perfect example of this.
so? what is some weak beta like you gonna do about it?
The feds are powerless to make states follow the constitution.
@@Sever-x7v nice, real brave of you commenting this behind a screen
@@whodoyouthinkiam210don't reply to bots.
@@whodoyouthinkiam210 sort of hard to comment on youtube otherwise sherlock sht brain
just be happy we aren't standing face to face, because you sure as hell wouldnt be standing for long ....
then again, nothing like a beta male who hides behind a fake name/fake profile like a coward
There should be a law that makes it a crime for officials to knowingly create laws that violate existing laws or high court rulings.
There is it's called deprivation of civil rights under color of law look it up.
@@CopperCooper420It's hard to count all the way to 242. Also 241 and 246 have been violated in recent news. But let's count how many have taken such charges...
18 USC 242
I don’t know about a law but the French used a guillotine and that was really effective.
@Gfyplz in France it's called Guillotine's Law.
When i can order a brand new full auto machine gun from a catalog and the mail man delivers it to my front door like my great grand father did ill be happy.
It was the postman back then. Might seem like splitting hairs, but there’s a difference.
@@fr33dom_s4int you mean kevin costner?
That’s when all this started to happen albeit slowly, in the early 30 s I don’t think sears catalog has those anymore , the word “ safety “ has been used for decades and century’s
@@deborahhargrove3710 you're all talk you don't do shit about it and it just a fantasy that's never going to happen for you ,,😭
Why are people like this.
That thing was in .45 I also must add. Dangerous times ahead.
Remands so cowardly, im sick of the court punting and punting and punting...
Rule on something
Ping pong, ping pong, ping pong.............
This whole thing appears to be a "POLITICAL HOT POTATO" that courts do not want to deal with!
Even SCOTUS did not go far enough by denying the authority of states, agencies or cities to place ANY RESTRICTIONS ON 2ND AMEMDMENT RIGHTS!
Exactly!
They get paid the same for doing less work. Not their problem. Shut up and pay your taxes whine baby.
If I disobeyed a court order I’d be in jail!
NY really does not understand “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”
It's the fault of SCOTUS for not just making one clear asf ruling on the second amendment and striking down ALL of these idiotic laws.
Oh they fully understand. They just don't care. One of the reasons I'm moving states very soon
Hey they starting to get the memo though It’s small steps but we slowly getting there
They understand it just fine, they just don't care. No one stops them and they can do whatever they want, so that's exactly what they do. Many such cases.
MANY CITIZENS IN NY KNOW WHAT THEIR RIGHTS ARE BUT THE PERPS IN AUTHORITY IN NY GOVERNMENT... NEED TO LEGALLY BE MADE FULLY EDUCATED BY THE HARSHIST LEGAL PENALTIES ...
EVERY Politician messing with anyone's rights should be held liable, PERSONALLY CIVILLY.
Criminal charges under 18 usc 242
WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR THEN????
Amendment II
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
My thoughts also.
The thing is that communists doesnt want their subjects to be armed because they fear that we might use our weapons against them.
That people dies because they cant defend themselves from violent crimes is nothing the political elite ever will consider.
Because our goverments in the entire western world hates and despise their own people.
Now that we have a unified government… just pass a national reciprocity law and be done with all these shenanigans by anti gun states.
Never going to happen because Republicans need an issue to browbeat their constituents into voting and donating. One of the most divisive issues that always brings the money in is gun rights. That's why Republicans and the NRA would often work against gun rights to help make a problem they could later claim to solve if only you would vote for them. It's called the hegelian dialectic, the powerful create a problem then offer you the solution pushing you always towards where they want you to be.
@@CopperCooper420That’s the whole Republican playbook. Economy and Immigration being great examples as well as gun rights.
This situation convinces me that SCOTUS opinions don't count for much in the face of state legislatures and governors.
And states only abide by the U.S. Constitution when it further their cause. Seems pointless to have a Federal Constitution if states do as they please.
I bet you still pay your taxes on time though.
@@CopperCooper420Like we have a choice?
As a NY based firearm channel and a NYSRPA member I appreciate you telling our State’s story.
as a new yorker who started hunting a year ago. i have really ben enlightened to the laws here and have a deep seated hatred for the stupidity of the laws here. i'm fortunate that my buddy brings a spare rifle but living in the city and getting a rifle permit (not required anywhere else in the state) is assenine moreover the price of applying for the permit and waiting times are major deterrents to even wanting to...... and the same is even more so for anyone who wants a pistol! its even more expensive and difficult to get a permit to carry a pistol. mind you i am a model citizen i pay my taxes i work i do not have a record and i practice safe gun handling when i using one yet it is near impossible for me to get one in a timely manner. i literally cannot have a gun before the spring hunting season opens up and not even by the time general deer season opens up bc it takes so long to process. furthermore i want to go on a public land hunt and want to carry a firearm for protection in case i encounter bears (unlikely but u never know) and i wouldnt even be able to do that for a year and change. again not mentioning the amount of money this will set me back just to apply for the damn paperwork and prints!
I know it sucks but for right now u gotta pay to play I had too and the only thing that I think sucks which I hope they fix is the NYC. Vs the rest of the state where an nyc cc can get u the whole state vs. the rest cc license doesn’t work in. NYC that’s just stupid. Glad I got the NYC but they act like A Licensce is not a licensce
@ yeah I’m working on it now just annoying that I have to wait.
I appreciate that he is keeping people informed. Unfortunately he puts out one video per day and 99% of the material is repeated information.
It becomes droning and loses effectiveness to a lot of the listeners. Viewer engagement is also hampered by his overly methodical speech patterns. I appreciate the fact he is trying to be precise in what he says but it’s become very difficult to listen to. If he really has updates when he says there are updates it would be easier. But to hear an update video that’s not an update why call it one? At times it’s like listening to the adults in Peanuts.
@@AnAmericanPatriot1555yup he just babbles on and on and on about pointless shit
2nd Ammendment as written is the ONLY PERMIT NEED FOR ANY LAW ABIDING. U.S. CITIZEN in these 50 States of America.
It is interesting to think who can enforce a SCOTUS ruling when a state's Governor, Legislation, and Courts refuse to comply.
grow a pair and quit crying beta boy
So Who is the Criminal?!
The only places citizens should not be able to carry is where CRIMINALS cannot carry. In other words no place should be banned!
Prisons are the only place that should be prohibited but this does not apply to their parking lots.
private property.... carry it in my business, im within my rights to disarm you and have you arrested or simply empty a mag in your a z z for being a potential armed robber
and anywhere there is alcohol served... you can't have a weapon or its a federal offense
@@Sever-x7vOKAY, PATRIOTIC SHEEP! 😂
Isn't there a rule about "judicial foot dragging?" This is obviously the result of a lack of accountability and checks and balances within the judiciary. Reform, anyone?
This whole court to court thing is very frustrating. It makes no sense at all that your Constitutional rights vary depending on what state you live in. Think about the millions of people that gave their lives for our freedom, and how in some states it was completely in vain. It's really sad.
It's infuriating
I bet you won't fail to pay a single cent of taxes to this corrupt upsidedown system?
The Supreme Court needs to be given teeth.
And Polygrip! 😁😄😅
Absolutely! It needs to be a crime to thwart the law!
Our rights are enforced in this country as a whole. Why are we not allowed to carry anywhere? Why are there boundaries allowed if it is a right? How ,lawfully, can your rights ever be restricted if they are rights?
It's all treasonous acts against the people.. woe unto you lawmakers.. it is written...
Your rights cannot be infringed upon...but they are doing it ..
Because States seem to think their laws outweigh federal laws. Kinda like states making marijuana legal but in reality the federal government could come to your house and arrest you for possession or growing if that's your thing.
Because States seem to think their laws outweigh federal government laws. Kinda like marijuana is still federally illegal and yes if you are growing or even in possession you can be arrested and property seized by the Fed's. I have this discussion with people all the time and they believe because it is legal in the state the Fed's have no authority. Well they would be wrong for thinking that.
When people dont follow a law, they have to pay the consequences, when a state doesn't want to follow a law, the people have to pay the consequences. Make them pay the consequences and be held responsible. I guarantee we'd hear from them a lot less
I live in New York State. It is going to take another 12 to 15 years before these judges figure it all out
It's all deliberate.
I’m in nyc are we ever going to get permitless carry and if so when? Also will the safe act ever go away
permit Less carry; the judges can’t get the regular basic ruling correct with Heller and Bruin
Bc they're paid for.
Then they'll have a whole new bag of tricks to use. It never ends.
A right may not be converted into a privilege.
Yet it has been and SCOTUS let's it continue
Apparently it can. 😅
I was going through some old Playboys from the 70's and 80's. There was an ad to order a mail order firearm. I was tempted to send a money order to the address just to see what would happen.
But you didn't....
@@professionalpookie Like I said, I was TEMPTED. In all seriousness, I'd have to consult an attorney before pulling a stunt like that. There are even dumber laws on the books right now and I could see ATF showing up at my door and arresting me some obscure California law I am ignorant to. I have too much to lose, but if you don't, I am glad to send you a copy of the ad.
@JustinBradleyPhotographer how would the ATF arrest you on a California law???
@@professionalpookiethe alphabet boys are ungoverned, and have kicked in doors and murdered people in their sleep over far less. I’d be hesitant too.
@professionalpookie you're missing the point. I bet you get caught up on punctuation mistakes too? This is the moment I start ignoring you because you aren't here for discourse, you're here to be a pest.
Love the content....one suggestion......a brief recap/summary of the video would be nice towards the end to help us (non-attorney types) capture the overall message. Thanks for what you do. Keep up the great work!
💯 .... yes please
Yes! I am getting ready to unsubscribed because it makes no sense to me.
he won't do that because that is all anyone would watch because we're sick of him blabbering on and it would cost him precious viewed minutes which is lost revenue and he makes more money doing this than he does as a lawyer. i mean do you not notice how every video is within a specific time frame. he does everything he can to maximize revenue.
I agree, I appreciate what he’s doing but a layman’s terms section or even definitions on screen would be more appreciated by viewers imo.
At the very least I can appreciate that these videos are historic documentation for the BS trying to be pulled to remove the rights of the people.
Totally agree. Not everyone speaks lawyer. Just give us a recap for normal blue collar people to understand
States and local governments explicitly do not have the right or jurisdiction to enforce anything having to do with weapons or the use or carry of weapons. That all falls under federal jurisdiction because that is a federally enumerated right and federal law. Allowing state and local governments to change and modify our rights and forcing citizens to assert their rights in court costing 10's or 100's of thousands of dollars, jail time or even costing their lives to do so is not legal. It is criminal. In order for the Constitution to be law and for the bill of rights to be law, they must be congruent on every square inch of US owned territory. PERIOD.
It's disgusting these politicians want to take away personal defense
Makes me sick ...
Bc they have personal ARMED security service. They DGAF
But you pay taxes? You fund this, it's your fault.
Thanks Anthony
Thanks for watching!
They need to get rid of all the magazine/gun bans popping up over all the states.
Already been decided in 1791 !
When in 1871 they changed the constitution.. they made DC a district it's not a state.. it's the war power.. it's a foreign entity.
Another district is city of London it's the financial power
Another district is the Vatican it's the religious power.
When in 1871 they changed the constitution.. they made DC a district it's not a state.. it's the war power.. it's a foreign entity.
Another district is city of London it's the financial power
Another district is the Vatican it's the religious power.
Jesus christ,have mercy on us,I'm blad I left NY 6byears ago for PA and now learning where I will stay my last stand as a 35 years old building his wealth and empire.
let go , tides are turning boys
🇺🇸👍
It doesn't matter. The SC rules against them, their legislatures just pass the same law but slightly different from the one struck down. Then they enforce it while it takes another decade for the courts to strike down the new law. Then when they do, it's rinse/repeat. The state legislature passes the same law, again slightly changed, and the legal process starts all over again.
How is denying people their constitutional rights not a crime? Any legislator drafting or voting for such a law should be charged. Any Governor signing a bill denying constitutional rights should be removed, and charged.
Funny how connected parties NEVER had a problem getting a permit especially if you had the money. In NYC there were only 4 ways. 1) You applied, got denied, sued and 10k later you got it, 2) You paid off the right people at the permit division (Jews getting permit scheme a few years ago). 3) Current Fire Department. 4) LEO Retire in good standing. Law biding citizens, forget it. Oh your gun's serial is on your permit. More then 1 gun go show the local PCT your safe for approval .
From ny i also dont agree with the background checks on ammo i had a check when i purchased the firearm shouldnt have to to get the ammo
Did you go to a New York city public school? Your typing shows that you did.
Americans should not have to ask permission from the state to carry their legally owned firearms.
TY A.S for all your 2A News
Thank you for the updates!!!
Armed Scholar, You are looking much better ! The loss of body fat really shows... Bravo to you !
All these judges should have to pass a reading comprehension test, and thereafter be held to it. The problem is that there is no accountability when government scumbags ignore their oath to UPHOLD the Constitution, which would PRECLUDE ignoring it, given that they passed the reading test in order to get the job..
Can I start caring now?
Thank you for this update.
MAGA
🇺🇸🇺🇸
Miga
People get happy about taking out c.e.os but Noone gets mad when the politicians knowingly violat your rights 2:28
Luigi the MK Ultra boy.😅
The constitution says plain as Jane, that permits are an infringement! No holds barred.
Let’s get a win!
🇺🇸👍
Is the state of New York having public votes on this issue or are they passing these laws on their own? Tyrannical government?
Thorough, yet concise, as always. Well done, and thank you.
The Supreme Court needs to JUST STRIKE THIS CRAP DOWN.
Is there anything that a good citizen can do to exercise our 2nd Amendment rights in NY or must we assert our rights and risk going to Jail for the sake of our constitution and failure of the Supreme Court of The United States to issue a ruling that is clear understandable and enforced by the U.S.Marshalls or the President issues an order to protect the people from tyranny.
NY state has got to be held to account for its heinous disregard of the law. They can’t make laws to circumvent the very constitution they claim to follow. People should be winning lawsuit after lawsuit ad infinitum with the way things are, the state is blatantly depriving people of rights.
Maybe I don't understand how the court system works, but why can't SCOTUS just say, once a case reaches them, that the state's law is null and void on Constitutional grounds, and that's final? Why do they have to remand it to a lower court?
Another great report now there needs to be criminal repercussions tor State leaders etc. Who violate constitutional rights
SC never stands on business with all their debatable verbiage.
Be concise and protect 2A
Why are judges on federal courts who have decisions reversed still allowed to serve? Their judgment is proven to be flawed so they should be dismissed and not allowed to 'serve' again.
Bearing arms, is in OUR CONSTITUTION.
Good Evening from Central Illinois and thanks for the update.
Permits for a right is not a right at all, it’s a permission.
Would this court case be holding a permit application up in the state of New York? I’ve submitted my application in September of 2024 and haven’t seen any movement on my application.
Every law abiding citizen needs to be allowed to defend themself and others. Bad guys never follow laws.
I live in the beautiful Upstate NY area and I am sick of this PIS governor wasting my money via taxes on unconstitutional gun laws. SCOTUS needs to uphold the Constitution in absolute and forbid any gun control "laws". Hochul and the likes of her need to be removed. I can't wait until she resigns, or arrested or voted out. I'm also a big fan of separating from NYC.
does this include a permit to purchase like Minnesota has, I wonder.
Hawaii requires a “permit to acquire” in order to purchase a firearm.
Thanks for the update
Asking permission to protect your family and self outside of the home Is absolutely dog shit. Any tyrant fudd who claims other wise should rethink their position. (I can think of a few Sheriff)
Why can't I find any news articles corroborating this?
This just in tomorrow will be another day
That should have already been done we are a constitutional republican and we have the right to protect our country from in and out from all enemies
When will this end? Come on scotus
ugh i dont get it why wont the deepstate puppets step up and give me my rights back!
Potential decision not actual.
They've made their ruling. Now lets see them enforce it.
Meanwhile you still need a permit for handgun or semi automatic firearm in ny.
If any state does not comply with federal law they should leave the union and become their own separate country. Enough of this b.s.
Can someone give the the short version of this video?!
you don't have the attention span for an already short 10 minute video?
Thank you
God bless you
Happy New Year 🎉
Happy new year
So ok I have a question that I have been curious about for a while now.
All these states ignore and disregard the SCOTUS decisions, so what recourse is there for someone or a state or municipality that doesn’t abide by the decisions?
Boycott said states and municipalities
Now they should do Arizona.
Just curious, what permit issue are you commenting on?
AZ can open carry or get a CC without much hassle. Why suggest AZ be next?
Great analysis. Thanks
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED OR SCOTUS GETS 2A
💥💥🇺🇸💥💥
Thanks
Thank you
How long before they figure out that the 4473 is unconstitutional?
how will this affect the NFA and Gun control act of 1968?
No permits needed, as it should be.
USA!
🇺🇸👍
Imagine if politicians or the media needed a permit to exercise their 1st ammendment rights
I am going to be realistic. A problem comes in with the right of the state to protect its citizens. The states problem comes in with the citizens' right to bear arms, which means you don't need a permit. The most likely result I can see coming from the Supreme Court is national concealed carry. Concealed carrying. In my opinion, national concealed carry would come under the context of prohibition of interference with interstate comerace. In that people should have a right to protect them themselves while conducting business in the state, such as spending on vacationing etc.
At this point, it is all just fun and games.
Meanwhile the black robes in DC continue to be mocked by the lower courts.
The robes in DC don't seem to care.
They are too busy because they are partying like it's 1860.
😮why do they keep going to the point of no return, and loosing the same way
Who interprets the constitution? Is the constitution written so the common person can interpret it! Is the government, regulated or are the people regulated?
Are the restrictions in the constitution for the government or the people? Sovereignty is for the people or the government?
Permission isn't needed on a God given right.
Good job
we will see. you all know this has been going down for years.
I say this. When law makers and judges put their guns down. And stop using Armed service. Then the people will listen to what you have to say
Great job sir. Thanks for sharing 👍
Supreme Court needs to reaffirm open carry too. An issue not nearly addressed enough.
They want your water rights because water burning engines are coming. it's stupid to not have them already! you get twice the horsepower with no emissions.
Question: Illinois NRA supported and ushered thru Concealed Carry Permit Structure outright criminalizes all public carriage for all but peace officers and then the purchased permission slips create a class of people exempt from the blanket prohibition. Open carry remains 100% prohibited as a result. That said, are other states carry permit structures this same way? Got Prior Restraint based on the interest balancing approach premise? Oopsie.
Yes
Please put commercial at THE END thank you