Flying the new Tecnam Gran Lusso

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 16

  • @susansticazsky9787
    @susansticazsky9787 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Finally One Amazing simple and modern aircraft wow!

  • @phermade1000
    @phermade1000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It's sporty and everything looks on point

    • @gloger
      @gloger 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A turbocharged plane is designed to fly at altitude and thus should come with sophisticated oxygen delivery system (eg Mountainair/Athrie) standard.

  • @lorendjones
    @lorendjones 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Based on fuel burn and capacity, wouldn’t it be nearly 1500 nm range with reserves? It would certainly outlast most bladders!

  • @phermade1000
    @phermade1000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It's a modern Cessna 172

  • @Cherfield-D-Blessedman
    @Cherfield-D-Blessedman 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love it.❤

  • @jonwoods8118
    @jonwoods8118 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The video states that a GFC700 AP is standard. The one on this panel looks just like my GFC500???🤔

  • @donjohnston3776
    @donjohnston3776 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The abandoned T-D Skylane project needs to be resurrected

  • @habibi750
    @habibi750 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m getting this plane

  • @richardventus1875
    @richardventus1875 ปีที่แล้ว

    Old adage: if it looks right it will fly right.

  • @edcew8236
    @edcew8236 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Title is misleading. Looks like you never actually flew it. Didn't say what the cruise speed is for max range. It only carries 360# with full fuel. And you didn't mention the price. Let's call this marketing BS, not what you'd expect from AOPA. Letter grade for this video: D-

    • @FlyingShotsman
      @FlyingShotsman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I had the same thought. It's $626,750 according to Flying magazine in July 2022. That's within shouting distance of Bonanza money, but 35 knots slower and 400# less useful load.

    • @susansticazsky9787
      @susansticazsky9787 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      For the average two people on board flight… Let’s face it JetA and 5 gal an hour is very very cool!

    • @FlyingShotsman
      @FlyingShotsman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@susansticazsky9787 Yes, absolutely, if you must have a new airplane. But if new isn't required you could buy a solid used Bonanza or C-182 for $300k, put $50k into the panel, fly a more capable airplane for 1,000 hours and still be money ahead.

  • @MsGeoff92
    @MsGeoff92 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They should be going electric not pumping diesel into the sky.

    • @larrydrum
      @larrydrum 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It does disperse pollutants into the sky (planet) more uniformly than having the pollutants concentrated around power plants.