Top Reasons I Choose A Zoom Lens For Capturing Wildlife

I've used telephoto zoom lenses for wildlife photography for about 18 years. But ever since I started wildlife photography back in 2005, I’ve dreamt of those big prime lenses-the kind you see professional photographers carrying around. I thought that getting one would instantly elevate my photography to the next level. But now that I’m finally in a position to afford one, I’ve realized that it doesn't offer me that much more than my lighter telephoto lens.
In this video, I take you through my thought process and experiences that led to this realization. I’ll be comparing the performance of these big lenses with lighter telephoto lenses that I’ve used extensively in the field. If you’re on the fence about upgrading to a big prime lens, this video might just help you make a more informed decision.
I group lenses into two categories: the “big lenses,” which include both prime lenses like the 400mm f/2.8 and premium fixed aperture telephoto lenses like the Nikon 200-400mm f/4, and the “lighter telephotos,” which are smaller, lighter, and often more versatile, such as the Canon 100-500, or the Sony 200-600. We’ll explore how these two categories stack up against each other in terms of background blur (or bokeh), weight, cost, and overall utility in the field.
Background blur is one of the main reasons photographers covet big lenses, and I’ll show you side-by-side comparisons of images taken with both types of lenses in similar conditions. While the big lenses do produce blurrier backgrounds, you might be surprised by how well the lighter telephotos perform-especially when you consider their flexibility and ease of use in the field.
I’ll also talk about the practical side of things. Big lenses are heavy and take up a lot of space in your bag. This can be a significant drawback, especially if you’re like me and often find yourself crawling, walking, and waiting around in harsh conditions for that perfect shot. I also discuss how I’ve had to optimize my gear to fit within the constraints of airline baggage limits. For me, the lighter telephotos win on portability and convenience, and that’s a major factor in my decision-making process.
In this video, I’ll share my personal experiences with both types of lenses and give you some tips on how to decide which lens might be right for you. If you’re considering investing in a big prime lens, I suggest you save up, rent the lens for a trip, and then compare the images you get with your current gear. You might find, like I did, that the upgrade isn’t necessary-and that you’d rather spend that money on more wildlife adventures instead.

[@SumeetMoghe]

Practicality in the field and technique. Those are bigger considerations than the physical qualities of a lens. Thanks for making this vid, mate.

[@AnuroopKrishnanPhotography]

@@SumeetMoghe 100%. And easier to carry to the field too. Thanks for your comment.

[@bharatsharma384]

U helped me clear my mind bro. Good that i came accross your video

[@AnuroopKrishnanPhotography]

thank you :)

[@viveks6919]

Amazing break down! I am to fan of smaller zooms , personall 70-200 f2.8 has been my go to for a bit.

[@AnuroopKrishnanPhotography]

@@viveks6919 one of my favorite lenses too. Just traded in my older EF lens for the RF lens - much lighter too. The 70-200 is also a great landscape lens for me :)