@@UnchainedEruption Crysis 2 from 2011 did not look better than Crysis 1 from 2007. This was also mentioned in several reviews. Also the competitor for the best looking console game of that time was Killzone 3, which had (from the perspective of some reviewers)the upper hand in terms of graphic. BUT yes it was and is a very beautiful game.
I don't think so, I actually think that is a result of the lighting system. The original has baked in self shadows for the bricks, but the remaster is using the raytracing to simulate the shadows. The lights are just hitting that wall more straight on within the game and so the shadows do not appear on the bottom of the bricks like the do when they are baked in.
@@brando3342 you are an idiot. the bricks clearly are tessellated in the original and are flat in the remake at least in this exact shot. I mean how goddamn blind are you not to see the bricks actually having shape and sticking out in the original in this spot?
I think part of the major difference is global lighting from the sun vs. hand baked in lighting effects. Too bad they couldn't keep a balance between the two, I find the stylized look of the first game better too
it was 2022, video cards are sold for the price of a car, but there is absolutely nothing to play, game developers release their hits of the 2010s slightly updated.
lol absolutely nothing to play? there are tons of new games. maybe you're not exploring enough. deathloop, kena bridge of spirits, hell let loose, resident evil 8, the ascent, the medium, back 4 blood, scarlet nexus, etc. there are upcoming like forza 5, halo infinite, guardians of the galaxy. there will always be something to play if you wanna play.
@@ivansharmanov3767 then you are moron. there are tons of good games out there so if you cant find something to play then you have personal issues. to think this old consolized garbage game is somehow your best option then you sure have some bottom of the barrel taste.
These remasters, are definitely for console players who never got to experience these classics in their glory back in Xbox360 and PS3 era, there is nothing new for PC players. The most disappointing part of these remasters is that they are only paint jobs, it would be way better if they improved the gameplay and added some new guns etc, at least they could have brought back C2 multiplayer which was great.
@@snakeeater3555 That's true but C2 multiplayer was shut down way too soon and communities with custom servers have shown, that it is still possible to play the multiplayer with a bit of effort. Unfortunatly they are not well known and last year the last private server was closed as I know. If more people would know that the multiplayer is playable again they would come back and also spend some money on it, because it was awesome and way better than c3 multiplayer.
Well I mean the story was kinda shit imo, but it's not like a remaster is going to change the writing or voicing any. Graphically though I totally agree.
@@UnchainedEruption Story didn't matter that much. Was just a fun game with nice graphics. Lots of replay value if you enjoy shooting guys while approaching the scenario using different strategies.
@@Salomon_G Yup, that's why some remastered don't even look like proper remasters, more like ports or modded games lol. Ezio Collection is a great example of that.
the original has more details i think. 1:47 the pile of stones for example or the bricks in the wall. are you sure you didnt mixed the original and the remaster?^^
He didn't, and overall the new version has much more detailed textures on the whole. Watch Digital Foundry's breakdown. The original title was about 12gb and this remaster is about 55gbs, so there is significantly higher quality assets and textures in there now as opposed to before.
@@sammyflinders yes, i saw it in another video. maybe he should not use DLSS in the remaster. but i think the changes are too small for buying the game again when you are already own it.
For a moment I thought the original was remastered. How the fk is this a remaster, holy shit! every time I see a comparison video of the original Crysis 2 to the remastered it boggles my mind
The major difference I noticed is the use of some volumetric effects in the remastered version, and that's not that much of an improvement imo, also for some reason the bump maps looked downgraded in this new version which is a shame, definitely not worth at all
Textures in remaster are so weird, even in 4k. In original they looks more grunge and contrast. But lighting, shadows and water in remaster looks more realistic.
It already looks interesting. In parts, the new version is also sharper in terms of image quality. But you have to remember who it was produced for: PlayStation gamers.
look at 1:40 the remastered textures are way better and the remastered colors and lighting also look at 2:19 i don't know do you want a remake ? it's already very good for a remaster
Original Crysis 2 has more saturation and contrast because rasterization allows and makes the game more artistic, however Ray Tracing makes it more realistic... People love to talk about RT, but they don't even understand what it does... they just know that the Ray Tracing makes reflections... Shadows are more realistic, however you have less contrast and ambient occlusion due to light leakage and reflection that does not occur in rasterization.
Is there tessellation effect on the remastered version?? Because at 1'35" the floor comparison shows the difference of that effect, right? And I prefer the color gradient of the original version, more near the blue instead the remastered version with his yellow palette -___-
Alright, so for the people calling Crysis 2 (2011) a "Masterpiece", I got some news for you. CryEngine 3 was made to handle consoles (whereas Crysis 1 was PC exclusive with CryEngine 2)... All PC gamers in 2011 took to the forums to complain how BAD Crysis 2 looked like.. Then Crytek released an "HD pack", where it appeared original 256x256 textures were updated to 512x512 textures, when we were expecting something breathtaking to wow us after Crysis 1.. Crytek listened to the PC fans worries and complaints, and really have outdone themselves in Crysis 3 (which the Remaster barely changes anything for that).. But for Crysis 2 PC, this is where the Remaster Sparkles the most! Crysis 2 PC Original was AWFUL (for PC gamers), this Remaster does it A LOT of Justice! Watch Digital Foundry breakdown: Crysis 2 + Crysis 3 Remastered PC Deep Dive
i downloaded the second installation on pc and it s 50gb, multiplayer not even included (no multiplayer is planned for remastered). I really didn’t notice big overhauls in the new version except Ray Tracing stuff, it might still be a CryEngine3 game. So did Saber Interactive just upscale the textures to make this 50gb big? Not even worthy than a MaldoHd texture pack
It's not a simple "upscale". They're all new textures, and they look incredible at 4K. The lighting is also very much improved. The original's lighting has aged poorly but is typical of its time.
Original looks more vibrant, wasn't much they could do to make it better to be honest they just needed to just add a little more shadows, light rays and detail to the scenery.
Yeni ışık efektleri eklemişler aradaki tek fark o. Oyunda grafiksel açıdan bir iyileştirme söz konusu değil. Elinizde eski sürüm varsa para verilir mi bence değmez.
Both look great, but differently, the original looks more intense with high contrasts, and immersive due to this, while the remaster is stylish too, with nice choice for colors, and more realism, making it immersive too for this reason. If I had to play one I would prefer to stick to the original, high contrast helps visibility, which is crucial in FPS games. This, and the fact Crysis 1 OG game was already greedy for ressources, so a remaster of the 2 😅
Yes that’s what Global illumination does. It makes the colors match with the color of the sun in-game. More realistic doesn’t always look the prettiest I guess.
The lighting is enhanced with GI - "Global Illumination" that's why it has a very subtle effect , Crysis1, 2 and 3 were only having a physical accurate path tracing with reflections , but the whole scene was built on Rasterization mode , if the game was a fully Path Tracing then it would be an amazing leap
@@2hotflavored666 and this is the main issue why game companies can't achieve realism because of the frame game fans ! Although the frame don't, only count on the light which this is a fraud there is other things like the texture quality and the topological count of the scene ! And there's fans who already made a full path trace enhanced mode on old game like quack and portal RTX and game performance looks normal
They just changed contrast and colors from green to yellow added 4k textures,volumetric lighting,screen space reflections and ray tracing effect bingo remastered :)
I think the people who think this remaster is unnecessary and bad are the same ones who love adding in copious amount of vibrant colors when using reshade filters, or they like how Michael Bay movies look. 🤷
They are crazy man, it’s true the point crisis 1 remastered suck, but these people are not even CRISIS FANS. If they are real fans they won’t let it BURRY, because by what they do, no more sells will come and no room for crisis 4 will happen.
@@knightx9405 On what? It's the same game, with somehow worse looking graphics. Why the fuck would I want to spend $30 on it? The type of attitude you're presenting is exactly what enables these companies to lazily "remaster" not even that old of games and profit off of them.
Okay it looks pretty but is still the same game just minor details in appearance. So why would I pay full price for a game that is the same an plays the same without any real improvements other than some minor appearance issues?
2:24 omg this here reminds me of an old HL2 mod "Update" on Steam, I walked into a trainstation hall area, saw the obnoxious sunrays just like these and a yellow filter that drowns out the environment, exited the game and uninstalled it immediately.
What I am most satisfied with is the improved light and shadow quality, the scene looks more harmonious in color. And with a player (not a viewer) will be able to play continuously for hours without worrying about eyestrain.
Remaster is way better technologically. Looks more natural: better shadows, better textures, better colors. Still they downgraded something like blur effect and sometimes bump mapping. Not sure why
@@Spinworth They reworked and upgraded 25% of the textures, upgraded even the traditional shadow maps, adding shadows to both water and glass and increasing the number of casting objects, upgraded materials, added a TAA implementation, added image based lighting, improved some cubemaps, added SSR, on top of ray tracing and svogi. It's a fairly big jump.
Dear comment section: Use reshade to tweak the color levels and color tint. This will give you a game that looks like the original while keeping the new graphical enhancements. P.S. Crysis 1 is the game that sees the largest remaster improvement because if global illumination.
The original has a more cold and filthy atmosphere, while remastered decided to make everything more clean and polished, almost warm sun shines on the horrison
If not for the titles saying which is which I think that most people (me included) would have a really hard time guessing which is the "better" one ;p alot of the time original looks better in terms of lighting/shadows, color scheme, details (cracks on concrete when you wake up) etc. This remaster is about 50GB while original is around 10. That is a 5 times the difference, and you need to get the magnifying glass to even spot the difference most of the time. lol
I don't know, that remaster looks kinda rough. Maybe they patches it up but the original looks to have better water and overall more 'gritty' look to it, probably due to better bumpmaps?
The remaster isn't a drastic improvement but I think that is a testament to how well made the original games were from a technical standpoint. These games were a lot of fun and I wonder if they aged well gameplay wise?
Something still feels off in the remastered version in parts...I dunno what it is...perhaps the lighting..? I dunno I can see they have added very small details here and there (I only watched a bit of it) most people won't see WHEN playing.
The lighting is enhanced with GI - "Global Illumination" that's why it has a very subtle effect , Crysis1, 2 and 3 were only having a physical accurate path tracing with reflections , but the whole scene was built on Rasterization mode , if the game was a fully Path Tracing then it would be an amazing leap
honestly from a person who doesnt notice small details i dont see much difference, guess thats how far ahead Crysis was for its time. Also is it just me but i find the lighting to be better in the original.
Since I'm not a nostalgia lover I'm not going to throw shit at the remaster just because it doesn't look identical to the original (as I see many complained in the comments). The reality is that the remastered version looks superior in everything. That cold and metallic aspect of the original disappeared, for a more realistic one, where the sunrise is seen better settled. The colors no longer look saturated as in the original, which is something that took away a lot of realism. The textures are superior and even the change from one to the other suited him very well to give more body to the objects. As I said, cry nostalgia lovers, I'll take the remaster. Because in addition, the performance is higher than in the original.
My impression is that both original Crysis 1 and 3 win over their remastered versions, while Crysis 2 is the only one that the remastered really worths it. At least graphically.
How is this a remaster? Slightly better lighting, but flat textures, like that brick wall when he opens the door. Kinda crazy that a remaster in the 2020's puts out a lower quality version then the original in 2011
Looks more better now lol. Crazy ass game Wee need more 4,5,6!! Edit:- unfortunately even those 2011 technology they used for this game is good looking still TO TRICK PEOPLE THAT IT IS STILL BETTER! But actually, despite that crisis 1 upgrade, it sucked , but this honestly, now it’s MUCH BETTER, MUCH!
Remastered it´s not a Remake, same game for me Pc player. I played all Crysis 1,, 2 and 3 are the best..But the last one the graphics on PC still amazing.
I would call it reimagined, not remastered, somehow it seems to me that the original is better. Would the combination of the original + BlackFire's Mod 2 + MaLDoHD 4.0 Final version be better than remastered? Probably yes.
Is the upgrade free? If its free i might try it if not they can forget it. I will never pay 2x for the same thing, over my dead body. They should go for their latest engine, that would be interesting or just make another game.
2:19 original pistol textures have a far better resolution compared to the remastered one imo, just look at them. The edgewear in the remastered pistol look blurry and low res.
The fuck happened to the textures in the "remaster"??? Look at the gun textures and the wall textures, it's clearly a downgrade, it also seems as if they removed some post processing effects?
DLSS and Ray tracing added - the only difference. At the first glance barely noticable difference in graphics not worth wasting those gigabytes for remastered version.
![Crysis 2 vs Crysis 2 Remastered Graphics & Physics Comparison [PC, 4K]](/img/n.gif)
This just shows how amazing and how ahead the cry engine was back in 2011
more to the point how amazing it was back in 2007.
@@nyranstanton203 No this is Crysis 2 which was 2011. Crysis 1 was 2007 and it did not look this good.
@@UnchainedEruption go back and play Crysis 2007...it does look pretty good and almost this good.
@@nyranstanton203 Also add in the factor that Crysis 1 had more open areas while 2 was more linear.
@@UnchainedEruption Crysis 2 from 2011 did not look better than Crysis 1 from 2007. This was also mentioned in several reviews. Also the competitor for the best looking console game of that time was Killzone 3, which had (from the perspective of some reviewers)the upper hand in terms of graphic. BUT yes it was and is a very beautiful game.
2:33
Note the bricks on the right.
In the original they are voluminous, but in the remaster they are flat.
I don't think so, I actually think that is a result of the lighting system. The original has baked in self shadows for the bricks, but the remaster is using the raytracing to simulate the shadows. The lights are just hitting that wall more straight on within the game and so the shadows do not appear on the bottom of the bricks like the do when they are baked in.
The original has tesselation on the bricks. The remaster does not. I remember it being a big deal when the game came out
@@dungusthefungus3283 the ps5 version has tessellation
@@brando3342 you are an idiot. the bricks clearly are tessellated in the original and are flat in the remake at least in this exact shot. I mean how goddamn blind are you not to see the bricks actually having shape and sticking out in the original in this spot?
@@robertsharp6072 yeah it actually looks like individual bricks in the original game
I like the more accentuated colors of the original game.
I think part of the major difference is global lighting from the sun vs. hand baked in lighting effects. Too bad they couldn't keep a balance between the two, I find the stylized look of the first game better too
He is using dlss on the remastered one which makes it blurry
Они перенасыщенны и с высокой контрастностью
Yea, same here.
True.. lol
it was 2022, video cards are sold for the price of a car, but there is absolutely nothing to play, game developers release their hits of the 2010s slightly updated.
you are so right.
lol absolutely nothing to play? there are tons of new games. maybe you're not exploring enough.
deathloop, kena bridge of spirits, hell let loose, resident evil 8, the ascent, the medium, back 4 blood, scarlet nexus, etc. there are upcoming like forza 5, halo infinite, guardians of the galaxy.
there will always be something to play if you wanna play.
@@HOPGamingZone all those games are soulless garbage
@@holorenSHORTS 100% agreed
@@ivansharmanov3767 then you are moron. there are tons of good games out there so if you cant find something to play then you have personal issues. to think this old consolized garbage game is somehow your best option then you sure have some bottom of the barrel taste.
Lets be honest, the original looks amazing back in the days, it's not even bad comparing with the remastered version
yes youre right but for my opinion the original looks 10 times better than the remasterd version
These remasters, are definitely for console players who never got to experience these classics in their glory back in Xbox360 and PS3 era, there is nothing new for PC players. The most disappointing part of these remasters is that they are only paint jobs, it would be way better if they improved the gameplay and added some new guns etc, at least they could have brought back C2 multiplayer which was great.
Well, its a remaster not a remake.
Its a 20$ re-release not a remaster.
That would be a Remake , this is a Remaster
Eski C2 MP oyuncusu duygulandım. ;(
@@snakeeater3555 That's true but C2 multiplayer was shut down way too soon and communities with custom servers have shown, that it is still possible to play the multiplayer with a bit of effort. Unfortunatly they are not well known and last year the last private server was closed as I know. If more people would know that the multiplayer is playable again they would come back and also spend some money on it, because it was awesome and way better than c3 multiplayer.
The original version has better colors
but the remaster better ilumination so yeah
your pick I guess
@@nicolasrodriguez5054 originals are mostly better than new games
No. It looks like overly bloomy ass.
yeah its more saturated
I also prefer the original game's hands and gun models than the remastered ones.
I didn’t know they released the remastered before the real game
lmao
Touche!
Who asked for crysis 2 to be remastered :XD. It's already a masterpiece.
Well I mean the story was kinda shit imo, but it's not like a remaster is going to change the writing or voicing any. Graphically though I totally agree.
@@UnchainedEruption Story didn't matter that much. Was just a fun game with nice graphics. Lots of replay value if you enjoy shooting guys while approaching the scenario using different strategies.
Remastered for consoles. That's really why remasters and remakes are made. Not for PC.
@@Salomon_G Yup, that's why some remastered don't even look like proper remasters, more like ports or modded games lol. Ezio Collection is a great example of that.
Many did. The first game sold well so they remastered the latter two.
I like original more.
the original has more details i think. 1:47 the pile of stones for example or the bricks in the wall. are you sure you didnt mixed the original and the remaster?^^
He didn't, and overall the new version has much more detailed textures on the whole. Watch Digital Foundry's breakdown. The original title was about 12gb and this remaster is about 55gbs, so there is significantly higher quality assets and textures in there now as opposed to before.
@@sammyflinders yes, i saw it in another video. maybe he should not use DLSS in the remaster. but i think the changes are too small for buying the game again when you are already own it.
For a moment I thought the original was remastered. How the fk is this a remaster, holy shit! every time I see a comparison video of the original Crysis 2 to the remastered it boggles my mind
Original one is fucking better and it's ridiculous
@@salaheddine9017 True,and people still defending the "remaster". XD
The major difference I noticed is the use of some volumetric effects in the remastered version, and that's not that much of an improvement imo, also for some reason the bump maps looked downgraded in this new version which is a shame, definitely not worth at all
Original is better. For PC players there is nothing new with these remasters.
False. You get RT, better lighting and way better textures.
@@ThisBirdHasFlown textures are worse than in the original game
Textures in remaster are so weird, even in 4k. In original they looks more grunge and contrast. But lighting, shadows and water in remaster looks more realistic.
LOL, this remaster looks so insanely unnecessary... what a waiste of time and money. Great comparison tnx!
It already looks interesting. In parts, the new version is also sharper in terms of image quality. But you have to remember who it was produced for: PlayStation gamers.
look at 1:40 the remastered textures are way better and the remastered colors and lighting also look at 2:19 i don't know do you want a remake ? it's already very good for a remaster
i didn't mention how there is more dirt and water details on the ground in the remastered
He is using dlss on the remastered one which makes it blurry
You say time and money as if much even went into these "remasters" 😂! It was just a cheap paint job.
Original Crysis 2 has more saturation and contrast because rasterization allows and makes the game more artistic, however Ray Tracing makes it more realistic... People love to talk about RT, but they don't even understand what it does... they just know that the Ray Tracing makes reflections... Shadows are more realistic, however you have less contrast and ambient occlusion due to light leakage and reflection that does not occur in rasterization.
Is there tessellation effect on the remastered version?? Because at 1'35" the floor comparison shows the difference of that effect, right?
And I prefer the color gradient of the original version, more near the blue instead the remastered version with his yellow palette -___-
Alright, so for the people calling Crysis 2 (2011) a "Masterpiece", I got some news for you.
CryEngine 3 was made to handle consoles (whereas Crysis 1 was PC exclusive with CryEngine 2)... All PC gamers in 2011 took to the forums to complain how BAD Crysis 2 looked like..
Then Crytek released an "HD pack", where it appeared original 256x256 textures were updated to 512x512 textures, when we were expecting something breathtaking to wow us after Crysis 1..
Crytek listened to the PC fans worries and complaints, and really have outdone themselves in Crysis 3 (which the Remaster barely changes anything for that)..
But for Crysis 2 PC, this is where the Remaster Sparkles the most! Crysis 2 PC Original was AWFUL (for PC gamers), this Remaster does it A LOT of Justice!
Watch Digital Foundry breakdown: Crysis 2 + Crysis 3 Remastered PC Deep Dive
Sorry to ask but can there be a comparison between crysis 2 maldo mod and remastered version??
as the mod looked very good
I just love the green tint on the original
I mean it's still there in some levels but just extremely toned down
The baked lighting looks better than the global illumination.
i downloaded the second installation on pc and it s 50gb, multiplayer not even included (no multiplayer is planned for remastered). I really didn’t notice big overhauls in the new version except Ray Tracing stuff, it might still be a CryEngine3 game. So did Saber Interactive just upscale the textures to make this 50gb big? Not even worthy than a MaldoHd texture pack
It's not a simple "upscale". They're all new textures, and they look incredible at 4K. The lighting is also very much improved. The original's lighting has aged poorly but is typical of its time.
2:32 el original posee Tessellation y el remaster no ... crytek vendio humo con estos remastered
Original looks more vibrant, wasn't much they could do to make it better to be honest they just needed to just add a little more shadows, light rays and detail to the scenery.
realmente no se nota mucha diferencia, lo que quiere decir que crytec hiso muy buen trabajo en los primeros juegos.
Yeni ışık efektleri eklemişler aradaki tek fark o. Oyunda grafiksel açıdan bir iyileştirme söz konusu değil. Elinizde eski sürüm varsa para verilir mi bence değmez.
3. oyun 300-400 mü ne, ben 3. oyunun Remastered'ı 59TL diye aldım sadece xd
Both look great, but differently, the original looks more intense with high contrasts, and immersive due to this, while the remaster is stylish too, with nice choice for colors, and more realism, making it immersive too for this reason. If I had to play one I would prefer to stick to the original, high contrast helps visibility, which is crucial in FPS games. This, and the fact Crysis 1 OG game was already greedy for ressources, so a remaster of the 2 😅
Original still looks better for me specially the color. remastered is a bit sharper and reshade. Overall original still gets my vote.
Yes that’s what Global illumination does. It makes the colors match with the color of the sun in-game. More realistic doesn’t always look the prettiest I guess.
Is this with the patches for DX11 and HD Textures on Crysis 2?
They look exactly the same, except the og has more detail and better colors, and the remastered is just brighter
They just add a filter on screen I can do it myself in Nvidia filter setting 😂
Really? You can add real RT and make the textures 4K with a filter? Impressive.
The Remastered versions doesn't make much difference to me since I have a PC. How bad does this game look on console?
The lighting is enhanced with GI - "Global Illumination" that's why it has a very subtle effect , Crysis1, 2 and 3 were only having a physical accurate path tracing with reflections , but the whole scene was built on Rasterization mode , if the game was a fully Path Tracing then it would be an amazing leap
Ah yes, Path Tracing. I too love playing the game at 10 fps 1080p unless I have the 4090.
@@2hotflavored666 and this is the main issue why game companies can't achieve realism because of the frame game fans ! Although the frame don't, only count on the light which this is a fraud there is other things like the texture quality and the topological count of the scene ! And there's fans who already made a full path trace enhanced mode on old game like quack and portal RTX and game performance looks normal
They just changed contrast and colors from green to yellow added 4k textures,volumetric lighting,screen space reflections and ray tracing effect bingo remastered :)
a old one looks much better
I think the people who think this remaster is unnecessary and bad are the same ones who love adding in copious amount of vibrant colors when using reshade filters, or they like how Michael Bay movies look. 🤷
They are crazy man, it’s true the point crisis 1 remastered suck, but these people are not even CRISIS FANS. If they are real fans they won’t let it BURRY, because by what they do, no more sells will come and no room for crisis 4 will happen.
@@knightx9405 Oh fuck off lmao, I'm not shelling out 30 bucks when I already have the same fucking thing in my library.
@@trailerparksupervisor5378 lol, depends !
@@knightx9405 On what? It's the same game, with somehow worse looking graphics. Why the fuck would I want to spend $30 on it? The type of attitude you're presenting is exactly what enables these companies to lazily "remaster" not even that old of games and profit off of them.
Okay it looks pretty but is still the same game just minor details in appearance. So why would I pay full price for a game that is the same an plays the same without any real improvements other than some minor appearance issues?
2:24 omg this here reminds me of an old HL2 mod "Update" on Steam, I walked into a trainstation hall area, saw the obnoxious sunrays just like these and a yellow filter that drowns out the environment, exited the game and uninstalled it immediately.
What I am most satisfied with is the improved light and shadow quality, the scene looks more harmonious in color. And with a player (not a viewer) will be able to play continuously for hours without worrying about eyestrain.
Remaster is way better technologically. Looks more natural: better shadows, better textures, better colors. Still they downgraded something like blur effect and sometimes bump mapping. Not sure why
remaster just looks like Crysis 2 but with Ray-tracing tho, def a Remaster only for consoles
@@Spinworth They reworked and upgraded 25% of the textures, upgraded even the traditional shadow maps, adding shadows to both water and glass and increasing the number of casting objects, upgraded materials, added a TAA implementation, added image based lighting, improved some cubemaps, added SSR, on top of ray tracing and svogi. It's a fairly big jump.
@@Spinworth That's false.
Dear comment section:
Use reshade to tweak the color levels and color tint. This will give you a game that looks like the original while keeping the new graphical enhancements.
P.S. Crysis 1 is the game that sees the largest remaster improvement because if global illumination.
No,but RE4 HD Project mod is.
The original has a more cold and filthy atmosphere, while remastered decided to make everything more clean and polished, almost warm sun shines on the horrison
This is why I never cared about remasters but remakes in the other hand are usually worth replaying
how the remaster feel like the exact graphic I played years ago
1:10 i can see why Crysis was so hard to run nicely
If not for the titles saying which is which I think that most people (me included) would have a really hard time guessing which is the "better" one ;p
alot of the time original looks better in terms of lighting/shadows, color scheme, details (cracks on concrete when you wake up) etc.
This remaster is about 50GB while original is around 10. That is a 5 times the difference, and you need to get the magnifying glass to even spot the difference most of the time.
lol
Not gonna kid you, in some parts, the original looks better.
You meant in almost all parts
yep
@@Darkhound1116 That's one way to put it ;)
I don't know, that remaster looks kinda rough. Maybe they patches it up but the original looks to have better water and overall more 'gritty' look to it, probably due to better bumpmaps?
I like both new palettes and previous version. Both look good🤍
Old Is Gold Baby .. Original Crysis 2 Is Always Best And Good
Nope.
I hope it's not blurry like original..
It's not. You can now disable all AA, thankfully.
The remaster isn't a drastic improvement but I think that is a testament to how well made the original games were from a technical standpoint. These games were a lot of fun and I wonder if they aged well gameplay wise?
The Crysis games still feel pretty damn good to play. The gunplay in all 3 still holds up very nicely.
am i one who cant see the difference(instead of upgrading the textures and maybe nex light effects, they've really changed)
Something still feels off in the remastered version in parts...I dunno what it is...perhaps the lighting..? I dunno I can see they have added very small details here and there (I only watched a bit of it) most people won't see WHEN playing.
The lighting is enhanced with GI - "Global Illumination" that's why it has a very subtle effect , Crysis1, 2 and 3 were only having a physical accurate path tracing with reflections , but the whole scene was built on Rasterization mode , if the game was a fully Path Tracing then it would be an amazing leap
honestly from a person who doesnt notice small details i dont see much difference, guess thats how far ahead Crysis was for its time. Also is it just me but i find the lighting to be better in the original.
I think it is not worth to try Remastered Edition.
IMHO, the original holds up pretty well. It was cutting edge back when released.
the warehouse is much less dark, which ruins the feeling of coming into the light
Crysia its the only saga that doesn't need remasters
Whats change?
When I first looked at this video I thought the original was the remastered and was like "wow that is a lot better, oh wait".
Since I'm not a nostalgia lover I'm not going to throw shit at the remaster just because it doesn't look identical to the original (as I see many complained in the comments). The reality is that the remastered version looks superior in everything. That cold and metallic aspect of the original disappeared, for a more realistic one, where the sunrise is seen better settled. The colors no longer look saturated as in the original, which is something that took away a lot of realism. The textures are superior and even the change from one to the other suited him very well to give more body to the objects.
As I said, cry nostalgia lovers, I'll take the remaster. Because in addition, the performance is higher than in the original.
Why remastered version is darker and more blur... trilogy now on sale on steam, anyone bought it?
It looks to me that they have got the original mixed up with the remaster.
Does the game perform better without Raytracing compared to to the original version ?
Does the remaster look worse? Yes, does it come with origin launcer? No, so the remaster wins no diff
I play and I love, the difference colors make my eyes feel comfortable for a long playing time
crysis already has the peak graphics that remaster look like a filter dark
Remastered looks like a quite good modders work rather than a software company...exchange textures this a common practice in decent mods...
remaster looks better but worse at the same time
The graphic of this game is way ahead of its time, it make remastered doesnt feel new...
Crysis series are masterpiece of video games
Remaster for this game wasn't absolutely necessarry.
Tthe pistol's position still bothers me, it feels way too close to my face
I'm sorry but shouldn't REMASTERED games look significantly better not slightly better or worse compared to the original?
My impression is that both original Crysis 1 and 3 win over their remastered versions, while Crysis 2 is the only one that the remastered really worths it. At least graphically.
I never say this about remasters but the original looks the same if not better
The graphics in this game are so good. That even the remaster does not look something impressive. The difference is absolutely negligible.
How is this a remaster? Slightly better lighting, but flat textures, like that brick wall when he opens the door. Kinda crazy that a remaster in the 2020's puts out a lower quality version then the original in 2011
Looks more better now lol. Crazy ass game
Wee need more 4,5,6!!
Edit:- unfortunately even those 2011 technology they used for this game is good looking still TO TRICK PEOPLE THAT IT IS STILL BETTER! But actually, despite that crisis 1 upgrade, it sucked , but this honestly, now it’s MUCH BETTER, MUCH!
Not worth the like 44 more gigs it takes up to only somewhat look better & Usually end up looking worse.
The orginal looks a little blurry and still looks alot similar to the remastered only better looking.
my controller doesn’t work on pc with this game it’s all messed up
A reshade mod could probably do this
В этой игре даже улучшать по сути нечего. Она сделана буквально на одном из самых пиздатых движков
hears hoping my 6950xt will handle 4
Remastered it´s not a Remake, same game for me Pc player. I played all Crysis 1,, 2 and 3 are the best..But the last one the graphics on PC still amazing.
God damn someone hired a bunch of new guys tried to crush the old games
what they remastered?
I would call it reimagined, not remastered, somehow it seems to me that the original is better. Would the combination of the original + BlackFire's Mod 2 + MaLDoHD 4.0 Final version be better than remastered? Probably yes.
Is the upgrade free? If its free i might try it if not they can forget it. I will never pay 2x for the same thing, over my dead body. They should go for their latest engine, that would be interesting or just make another game.
21€ on epic games
2:19 original pistol textures have a far better resolution compared to the remastered one imo, just look at them. The edgewear in the remastered pistol look blurry and low res.
That very much looks like effect of DLSS.
The edge is blurry because of depth of field, and the pistol's details are being hidden due to the more accurate lighting.
they willing us to pay more for game that worse than the original
Its lumetri color work
I hope they optimized graphic
Everyone has its own taste but i like the Remastered Graphics
The fuck happened to the textures in the "remaster"??? Look at the gun textures and the wall textures, it's clearly a downgrade, it also seems as if they removed some post processing effects?
DLSS and Ray tracing added - the only difference. At the first glance barely noticable difference in graphics not worth wasting those gigabytes for remastered version.
Remastered. More like recolored
Pistol looks much better in the original.
Hans Zimmer 😍