Gandhi's Two mistakes |Jay Lakhani | Hindu Academy |

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
  • We don’t often dabble in politics but we have to comment on how spiritual aspirations of India were undermined in favour of a half baked secular agenda that has demolished the moral fabric of that nation resulting in corruption infecting every field of public life.
    Visit Http://www.hindu-acade... for more information.
    The topic in this clip can be further explored on twitter by subscribing to
    Twitter Humanism1893 se...
    This account is called Humanism1893 because it reflects Humanism that came on world stage in 1893 via Swami Vivekananda
    Please Like and Share our videos and subscribe to our TH-cam Channel : / hinduacademy
    You can also join the conversation on our social media channels:
    Facebook: / hinduacademy
    Linkedin: / jay-lakhani-spiritual-...
    Join our Whatsapp Broadcast Group by sending a Whatsapp message to: +447717884792
    ~-~~-~~~-~~-~
    Please watch: "Is Atheism sin ?"
    www.youtube.co...
    ~-~~-~~~-~~-~
    #JayLakhani #HinduismExplained #HinduAcademy

ความคิดเห็น • 587

  • @tr0nixx
    @tr0nixx 7 ปีที่แล้ว +318

    nehru used Gandhi for his own political gains like Kejriwal used anna hazare for his.

    • @xaeed1
      @xaeed1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      agrees

    • @shudhsangeet1657
      @shudhsangeet1657 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      dono chaman chutiye nikle

    • @usernumber-rx1kf
      @usernumber-rx1kf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Bjp also used Anna Hazare

    • @shubhanshurai6671
      @shubhanshurai6671 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly!!

    • @jajaja7394
      @jajaja7394 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Congress used gamdhi's death.They hardlh cared abt him.Anyway,that gandhi himself was a chu

  • @ZubairKhan-vs8fe
    @ZubairKhan-vs8fe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    You are right. Partition destroyed our brotherhood. I look forward to the day that it is reunited as one.

    • @srinivaskumar4224
      @srinivaskumar4224 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I cant say about it.
      But i wish people realize on both sides, what Europe went through and focus on individual development and rational thinking , automatically peace will come , people can differentiate dogmatic statements and spiritual lines easily and become better.

    • @saurabhb1041
      @saurabhb1041 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nobody in India wants anything to do with Pakistan and Bangladesh. We are over the partition.

    • @ukdave472
      @ukdave472 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Islamic separatism and dominance destroyed brotherhood and humanity everywhere. Muslims never compromise on anything. Not even with loudspeakers. After taking Pakistan and Bangladesh, muslims want to rule India using Islamic jihad as a tool. Gandhi was assassinated for the imperfect partition

    • @shakespeare8030
      @shakespeare8030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Given the treatment of Muslims in India today, Its a good thing that Muslims got Pakistan. and subsequently Bangladesh.

    • @supersuper3493
      @supersuper3493 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@shakespeare8030indian muslims are suffering because their brothers got pakistan and Bangladesh.

  • @soumyaranjanbiswal3944
    @soumyaranjanbiswal3944 6 ปีที่แล้ว +187

    Nehru is the biggest mistake in Indian history ever...And now we are still paying the price

    • @writeintent3936
      @writeintent3936 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      soumyaranjan biswal N according to the politics of dividing hindus, that is going on these days... Seems like we shall continue to pay the price for a long time to come.

    • @jajaja7394
      @jajaja7394 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Congress is the biggest scam

    • @Flickifi
      @Flickifi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yup, and the mistake Nehru made was that he was born....rest is all history. Just look at all that DNA debris he has left behind 😪

  • @gauravnmathur
    @gauravnmathur 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    There was actually a 3rd major mistake and that was Gandhi's economic philosophy, village based, agricultural and anti-industrial, socialist, backward. The economic philosophy kept India underdeveloped for decades and is only now catching up...
    Also RIP Jay Lakani. I wish I had the opportunity to meet you sir. You were a legand and great man and will continue have followers because if these videos far into the future...

  • @sourabh3981
    @sourabh3981 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Really like your frankness in talking about sensitive topics Mr. Lakhani. I just came across this channel and am going to use to teach my son the beliefs of Hindu culture(along other things).

  • @stevengerrard8961
    @stevengerrard8961 6 ปีที่แล้ว +176

    sardar Patel instead of Nehru and India would've been thriving by now.

    • @knidhi8993
      @knidhi8993 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ha, hah, haa!

    • @kaushikvsmaniyan
      @kaushikvsmaniyan 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sardar Patel passed away in 1950. What would have happened then?

    • @ajayajay-is7xb
      @ajayajay-is7xb 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@kaushikvsmaniyan after 1947..these three years are most important to Iron man....but due to dumb ass and half knowledge nehru nation is drowning very badly...

    • @JohnSmith-qf7yz
      @JohnSmith-qf7yz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@kaushikvsmaniyan 3 years were enough to lay a strong foundation. Sardar Patel understood very well that to remove poverty, capital formation is needed for which pvt enterprises are to be promoted (btw he was a gujarati), so he'd have laid the foundation of capitalism with limited state unlike Nehruvian Socialist Administrative state which was finally done away with in 1991 though it's still making its impact.

    • @radheg8863
      @radheg8863 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@knidhi8993 What are you laughing at?
      Над чем ты смеешься?

  • @Perfumencigarettes
    @Perfumencigarettes 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    this is an open secret. you are courageous to admit it. we Indians will forever regret the split of our great undivided nation.

  • @abuljaishahmad3281
    @abuljaishahmad3281 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    You have said great things sir... Partition was the worst thing happened to our Nation.

    • @sagar_sangogi4350
      @sagar_sangogi4350 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It was good decision but the mistake was to give Indian land to Muzlims and keeping them in India.

  • @Nadd108
    @Nadd108 7 ปีที่แล้ว +124

    Nehru betrayed Gandhi & the Nation big time. Nehru wanted to be the PM desperately.

    • @divyanshusrivastava6614
      @divyanshusrivastava6614 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Nadeem Ahmed nehru and Jinnah both did it for political greed. but on the other side Jinnah asked for a separate Constitution for the single country, which was very stupid

    • @biekaorie900
      @biekaorie900 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Nadeem Ahmed The separation was done only for the Muslim to get a Islamic state. But India must also than become a Hindu state without Muslims. The Nehru and friends hijacked India and made a secular state. It is impossible for Muslims to live in India because they created a separate Islamic state. What was left has to become than a Hindu state because there would be no muslim in India. India there for can never be a secular state. The status of India had to be changed.
      It had to renamed Bharat.

    • @AkashSingh-uq2qf
      @AkashSingh-uq2qf 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Divyanshu Srivastava Such consititution exists in the world, in Lebanon. Now Muslims and Christians live their peacefully after bloody civil wars.

    • @jajaja7394
      @jajaja7394 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @A D and gadhis gave us slaves like u

  • @jimmatrix7244
    @jimmatrix7244 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Exactly! The truth been told.

  • @hamza3065
    @hamza3065 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Seriously I wish we weren't separated. Partition was a big blunder.

  • @benquinney2
    @benquinney2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I never make the same mistake twice, I always make new ones

  • @rashibhatt3461
    @rashibhatt3461 6 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    This is the bitter truth.. None of text book will highlight this and we continue to treat Gandhi as god

    • @panku16
      @panku16 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I dont consider him God

  • @user-sm8fr7kl2e
    @user-sm8fr7kl2e 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Jay Lakani is honest.....Great person...

  • @krisryali
    @krisryali 7 ปีที่แล้ว +151

    Gandhi might be too soft guy to say no to anyone. But, on division of India, if it was Gandh's decision, then it was the biggest favor Gandhi did for the country. Yes the whole country had to take the burden of Nehru family for 65 years, the real independence India had in 2014

    • @venkateshaa8032
      @venkateshaa8032 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      and because of this new independence soon we will be in the hands of americans , british and chines again.

    • @krisryali
      @krisryali 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why do you think so?

    • @venkateshaa8032
      @venkateshaa8032 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If the same scenario continues next step is that country will in the hands of Indian billionaire and they will sell this to these countries.

    • @krisryali
      @krisryali 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It's same everywhere. Even in US Big and Rich get things done for them. There isn't much difference if it is congress party or BJP. Big billionaires always influence the Govts

    • @shubhabenil
      @shubhabenil 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We lost one quarter of our land, and there is insurgency on all four sides.

  • @jsp45
    @jsp45 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    India got independence in 2014

  • @bancilss
    @bancilss 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    You make sense Jay Lakhani , my father used to say something similar

  • @moderntimes4814
    @moderntimes4814 6 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    What about Subhash Chandra Bose...if u read deeper history u know why British left India...not because of gandhi ji.....

  • @gaganbhattacharya9890
    @gaganbhattacharya9890 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    3rd Mistake: If Gandhi was such a supporter of non-violence then why did he send Indians to fight for the British, not once, but twice!
    Gandhi & Nehru both may have started with a good intention but gradually got corrupt & eventually became Western stooges!

  • @kundansarma8808
    @kundansarma8808 6 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    gandhi was popularised by the british... before that he was nothing and the satyagraha thing had failed upto a certain extent in south Africa

    • @jyotivyas9286
      @jyotivyas9286 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Absolutely. Bhrata Shri. Me too feel this the same. But you are so So Right🤝🙏🕉️🌸🇮🇳 Bharat

    • @pradeepchand5205
      @pradeepchand5205 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bro can u show me any movement which was successful by violence..in indian history against british

    • @sanskaarkhare
      @sanskaarkhare 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Pradeep Chand Have you ever heard about the 2nd world war which lead Japanese Army and Azad Hind Fauj to gain the first Independent Govt. of Undivided Bengal Under Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose..
      This defeat proved to be the last nail in the Coffin of British Empire in India
      #तुम मुझे खून दो। मैं तुम्हें आज़ादी दूँगा।⚡

    • @ankitverma545
      @ankitverma545 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Congress was their to accomodate british at ground level....look at his founder AO Hume.....so how can u expect hardcore nationalism from them...congress leaders used to be in VVIP jails under british while others leaders or garam dal used to be yarwada kalapani jail....so u can see who was working for whom

    • @ankitverma545
      @ankitverma545 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pradeepchand5205 INA movements.....and some acts by navy officers agaunst british

  • @Soothsayer210
    @Soothsayer210 6 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    I negate both his examples.
    He says 'Muslims have lived with us for a 1000 years very PEACEFULLY....' i doubt if that is the Historical reality.
    Surprised to see him blaming UK especially when he is living there and has the freedom to question their authority.
    Would he have done the same under a Muslim rule?
    I am glad India and Pakistan split. Pakistan means 'Land of Pure', they had all the opportunities in the World to show what an Islamic state can be. Look at the mess they are in now. Jinnah would be turning in his grave now. Islam can NEVER exist in a democratic society. Some of the failed examples below.
    Turkey - Under the founding father Ataturk and current president Erdogan
    Iran . - Under Shah and Ayathoola Khomeni
    Bangladesh, Bosnia, Chechnya, Malesia.....
    In short, India is far well off because India and Pakistan have separated and that India does not have to shoulder the burden of Pakistan's backward society.

    • @vve2059
      @vve2059 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you really think muslims would be a majority if religious chambers like pakistan and Bangladesh would haven't been created

    • @harshanandomun6283
      @harshanandomun6283 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      A major clean up of intruders should be thrown in the Indian ocean.

  • @manjunathl5000
    @manjunathl5000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Absolutely truth sir what you said....

  • @formobile4969
    @formobile4969 6 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    India did not get freedom because of Gandhi, India got freedom because of world war. Please read foreign books related to Indian Independence rather than Indian books. Gandhi kept the Indians docile and hence his life was very important for the British. His ashram was funded by British influence to keep him busy and contented. Gandhi did not mind killing of indian soilders for saving British during the world war. So hypocritical and narrow minded. Gandhi was very arrogant in whatever views he had and others including Nehru had to follow him.

    • @paul4657
      @paul4657 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Please show proof, don't just write as you like.

    • @peterd7930
      @peterd7930 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Very true

    • @suhaib6315
      @suhaib6315 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you kidding me, you are spitting on all of the freedom fighters of India, Non-Cooperation, Quit India, Dandi march all of these were the greatest mass movements against oppression in History. Gandhi had a huge cultural influence too, South India was very distinct from North even today the people are different but all southerners respect Gandhi, He united the country and lead the fight for independence. India could have rioted and got freedom or the British would have massacred us all, he showed a better path, it takes a lot of strength, and he had more strength than most.

    • @alexwolf4000
      @alexwolf4000 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Gandhi was MI 5 secret agent, his job was too distract indian ppl with religion, he successfully delayed indian freedom during 1st World war,
      satyagraha was in British interest to keep ppl calm, no revolt to economic policies implementated to deal with 1930 crash,
      Britain left India due to heavy losses made in 2nd world War.
      The plan was to control remotely with central Bank policy so rbi act was written 2nd with geopolitical strategies so pakistan was created

    • @rsubhasify
      @rsubhasify 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@paul4657 Gandhi really never opposed British sovereignty....he always considered himself as an honest British subject....what proof will you need more?

  • @Rj-po9lx
    @Rj-po9lx 7 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Because of ghandi, millions of people died...

  • @pramodtinku7214
    @pramodtinku7214 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Well, people like Subash Chandra Bose deserve more credit for our independence than Gandhi..

  • @adityaandytiwari
    @adityaandytiwari 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    He had done hundreds of mistakes not just 2 ... Today we hindus r getting the taste.

  • @loko4607
    @loko4607 6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    gandhis mistake was to not let the remaining muslims go to pakistan,india would have been at the top if that had happened

  • @2168017
    @2168017 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Gandhi never cordially agreed to partition. Eventually it was Patel and Nehru who gave up on United India because of the continuous violence that was taking place during that time and the fear of not being able to form a strong Indian union had Jinnah and Muslim League stayed in India.

  • @mukeshparekh3724
    @mukeshparekh3724 8 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    As far as I know both Nehru & Jinah were responsible for the partion. I do agree for the second mistake.

    • @MrDillbud
      @MrDillbud 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's right m parekh.

    • @MandeepSingh-bv2zw
      @MandeepSingh-bv2zw 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Before Nehru, it was d Hindu Mahasabha who was actually responsible for the partition. It was governing provinces with d muslim league as an ally. In 1943, the Hindu mahasabha + muslim league passed d resolution for creation of Pakistan, making Sindh the first province in d sub-continent to do so. Before Jinnah, it was actually Savarkar who first spoke of 2 nation theory. Hindu Mahasabha + Jinnah + Gandhi + Nehru + Patel ... all were responsible for d partition of India.

    • @tusharpotdar5762
      @tusharpotdar5762 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Pl. read some authentic book, in India two nation theory, one for Hindu and other for Muslim, was introduced by Vinayak D. Savarkar, it was jinna and British viceroy because of whom partition was made, even Nehru agree to giveaway his claim of to be prime minister of India, jinna was stand hard on his demand of separate nation for muslim,
      This man is a right lining ideology person, he is describing the mistake made 60+ years back, but can't quote mistake committed in 1991, or in 2002, or in 2016
      He is fooling other with his soft voice & speaking skill

  • @sandhyaviswanathan9696
    @sandhyaviswanathan9696 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir with all respects, please with Ahimsa we cant even straighten our children or vacate a tenant - how could we have sent out the British - I felt that British left India because they were fairly satisfied that the Indian minds have been colonized and their physical presence was not needed anymore.

    • @sashab9611
      @sashab9611 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This 🙌

    • @mchinnakkamchinnakka2122
      @mchinnakkamchinnakka2122 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      British left when they saw that there was nothing much to gain after exhausting India of its resources?

  • @madhavnandjha6263
    @madhavnandjha6263 6 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Really India got independent from negru brand in 2014

    • @biekaorie900
      @biekaorie900 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Shree ram Your right. The first president of independent India is Modi ji. Look where India stands in just 4 years of leadership of Modi ji. The 3 economy and whole the world wants now to become friend of India. The sun of mother India is back. Yes the incidence day must be in August 2014.

    • @shubama3
      @shubama3 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      can you say it now

    • @shubama3
      @shubama3 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@biekaorie900 and you know congratulations today we are corruption free.... and our economy woow its on 13% after respected modi sir

    • @shubama3
      @shubama3 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      and you know we will soon become 5 trillion economy .. very soon 2040 .. i hope you got what i said sir

  • @amolnagavkar
    @amolnagavkar 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yes i am agree with Jai Lakhani.......

  • @ayyathuraimurugan4385
    @ayyathuraimurugan4385 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    INDIA want peace..... All over the World.... But the Two Mistakes made us foolish by because of NEHRU Family now itself....

  • @nathanvaidya8135
    @nathanvaidya8135 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Every sensible Indian will accept what Mr Jay Lakhani has pointed out the two Himalayan blunders Mr Gandhi had committed. Very true we are paying a heavy price for them.To undo them Mr Modi has to be the P.M for the next 15/20 years and God should give him the longevity.

  • @sadenb
    @sadenb 7 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    Netaji gave us independence

  • @mahendrab.3074
    @mahendrab.3074 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    gandhi was fooled by nehru . jawaharlal nehru took gandhi's name,india and also the congress party

  • @harism5589
    @harism5589 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nicely said, Gandhi ideas of nonviolence and “satya graha” worked against British. However “partitions” of the country and mass killings of people was result of his decisions. Hindus were given “education” by him to get killed but do not fight back with Islamist. Islamist were “educated” by their clergymen to use violence. Today we are suffering by his decisions and teachings.

  • @KalitaJ
    @KalitaJ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    gandhi deserves to be condemned for this ..as mr Lakhani had said he couldve stood his ground for as long as possible.. but he didnt

  • @amitcarbyne3635
    @amitcarbyne3635 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If partition would not have happened, india would have 25% Muslims population now and in three decades the population would have become very close to gaining majority, which could have resulted in India becoming Islamic state. Agree with nehru point.

  • @DiegoLinde
    @DiegoLinde 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I been saying this to Indians and Pakistanis for years.
    Bharat Varśa was ONE

  • @makahanp
    @makahanp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Absolutely correct 👍

  • @joeyetwaru5500
    @joeyetwaru5500 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I also share that view, sri krishna resisted that path and the pandavas fought to keep india as one nation he should have been more preceptive to the history , amazingly he studied gita

  • @hector1094
    @hector1094 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He is not the father of our nation.
    Gandhi is the father of chaos in our nation.

  • @thesingh4519
    @thesingh4519 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    M preparing for upsc.. N it breaks my heart to read all praises about gandhi and nehru n no one talks about what blunder they did to is hindus.. N we hve to use secular every where coz thats what our Constituition talks about

    • @mchinnakkamchinnakka2122
      @mchinnakkamchinnakka2122 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Constitution should have been equal rights for all.
      But Gandhi seemed to be oblivious of Hindus position....

  • @sudhirshipurkar9794
    @sudhirshipurkar9794 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Yes sir, quite so!

    • @HinduAcademy
      @HinduAcademy  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your comment, please check out our website www.hindu-academy.com/ for Hinduism course, Many thanks.

  • @JaySingh-wp6ov
    @JaySingh-wp6ov 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My friend it was actually the Sikhs that got torn apart. Punjab was the homeland of the Sikhs.

  • @andrewrai5752
    @andrewrai5752 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sorry the Hindu Muslim relations was NOT well before the British came in! There was tremendous amount of conflict.

  • @mihirpurohit2280
    @mihirpurohit2280 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yes these are agreed facts that Gandhi has comitted blunders and can not be forgiven for his Neheru Prem and seeing him as PM of a divided India and for his anti Hindu policies. The word Mahatma should be withdrawn immediately from his name and Similarly the word Pandit should be withdrawn from Nehru by passing resolutions in Parliament.
    Both Gandhi and Neheru are responsible for all the tragedies of undivided Indians.

  • @gigahertzrat
    @gigahertzrat 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    2:03 insightful and enlightening

  • @rajramgoolam
    @rajramgoolam 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Don't agree that the two "mistakes" are mistakes . But siding with Nehru against Bose for Congress leadership initially and later against Patel were decisions that had critical negative impact on india

    • @sagarmohanpawar4057
      @sagarmohanpawar4057 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He literally sat on fasting till death just to give 55 crores to pakistan 🤣

  • @vaidyaprakashanand
    @vaidyaprakashanand 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Ahhh awesome man this is.. two bull's eye shots.. Great to hear people come out and say this. Not many dare do that. Hat's off.

  • @himmatbhaithanki7816
    @himmatbhaithanki7816 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mahatma Gandhi did many mistakes. Sri Aurobindo 's opinion was that - Shaitan was working working through Mahatma Gandhi. ( Ref. CWSA- Complete Works of Sri Aurobindo, Volume 35, Page 185..)

  • @phanirajsrinivasch8108
    @phanirajsrinivasch8108 8 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Gandhi wanted Congress to elect its Prime minister candidate.. Sardar Patel won the elections and Gandhi supported Patel's candidature.. But Nehru blackmailed Gandhi and Patel to divide the Congress party on the basis of caste and religion.. He also had a strong lobby in the British government.. Gandhi negotiated this with key posts of Deputy PM and Home ministries to Sardar Patel.. Gandhiji always said that Congress party should be dissolved after independence but Nehru gained this for his political ambitions. Gandhiji was in Calcutta in 15th August,1947 when Nehru was celebrating independence day in Newdelhi as Prime Minister.

    • @vishalwadje8422
      @vishalwadje8422 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Gandhi thought - well educated in london , with soft spoken english skills - Nehru will be better PM than the rigid & tough not so english soft spoken Sardar Patel , Patel was kinda nationalist , Nehru was british appeaser ... Gandhi thought Nehru will do good , but he never knew - that Nehru was like - all show & no action type of politician. Nehru said in parliament why fight with china over a piece of barren land called aksai chin, he was not clever at all with his forward policy as well which proved to be blunder to provoke chinese .

    • @AshvinPatelUSA
      @AshvinPatelUSA 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I agree except that Gandhi failed to see the evil that lie inside the Nehru and also failed to see the goodness in the heart of Patel. I think Gandhi was also under the financial obligation of Nehru family as they were rich.

  • @karanmungra5630
    @karanmungra5630 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    People speak of Nehru as someone who has just done wrong for his country without reading his thoughts. But time will change and the thoughts of Nehru will rise again. and modi government is free of corruption then ask those who are being neglected in his reign.

  • @neetarawat3267
    @neetarawat3267 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Let us become wise now and create awareness among people to vote write people

  • @amj.composer
    @amj.composer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Any logical person who has read Bose’s story knows Gandhi’s biggest mistake was not supporting him. I don’t hate Gandhi, he did a LOT for the country, but Bose was the real boss.

  • @makhanlalsaha1026
    @makhanlalsaha1026 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks . you are correct. There has lot of other mistakes by GANDHI.

  • @raymond942
    @raymond942 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Gandhi actually went out of his way to get Muslims everything, even aiming to heavily finance Pakistan post partition of Punjab. Sikhs were 1% of the nation , but gave 90% of the blood sacrifices to get India independence. Despite Gandhi & Nehru assuring Sikhs not to make a separate country offered by British, saying Sikhs will be a fully autonomous authority, after joining India, Punjab was cut in half again (being halved by the partition already), then hindu govt slandered sikh gurus & Sikhs as barbaric, then Punjabi was disAllowed as the language of Punjab... jumping to now, waters of the once green Punjab are drained to starve Punjab. In the 80s indira Gandhi planned to “wipe out sikh identity in India” resulting in major campaigns , such as to rape sikh girls, & mass kidnap/cremations of baptised sikh youths, with the ultimate insult, the planned attack (18 month preparations with Brutish involvement) in the Sikhs holiest shrine , timed on the busiest day, with no transport outlets (for maximum sikh civilian deaths) and media blackout. Minorities in India now realise they have traded one slave master for another...

  • @akshay1962
    @akshay1962 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Gandhi had not made two mistakes only he had done blunders

  • @friendpatriot1554
    @friendpatriot1554 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No use talking the past.we have to now decide how to stop spread of islam and christianity in India to save our culture .

  • @abhijeetparalkar8271
    @abhijeetparalkar8271 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't think any single person should be blamed for current state of india. It was Hindus who as a community were so disintegrated in caste system, selfish,traitors and cowards to fight off their enemies. Hindus would surrender to their Invaders - first Muslim rulers and later British, without putting up a challenge in the battlefield. Eventually they became so coward that they put Gandhi, an anti Hindu, at the helm of freedom fight, who in the name of non violence and secularism cheated with Hindus and made them leave their own land. They were so ingenuous to accept a power hungry man as first prime minister of independent India who ruled and ruined the nation for 14 long years. After 70 years it's a pity to see that they haven't learn a lesson from their past mistakes and willing to accept another partition. May God bless India.

  • @shoka2114
    @shoka2114 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Relations between hindus and muslims were not good before partition. There were riots happening in British India.

  • @santanuroy9101
    @santanuroy9101 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    gandhi never made any mistake, he was a shrewd politician, everything he did he knew what its consequences would be. He had an enormous ego.

  • @winstonbachan3921
    @winstonbachan3921 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Gandhi Ji Give The Seculars The Freedom To Talk Nonsense About Him!

  • @warpdrive9229
    @warpdrive9229 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    British left India after Indians in the British Indian navy revolted. They felt if next the army mutinied they will be massacred. So to save their faces they went. Also mutiny came beacuse of Azad Hind Fauj of Bose. Nehru Gandhi dont deserve the limelight.

  • @ravimoopen2040
    @ravimoopen2040 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Gandhi was master tactician, he could have done much more to prevent the partition of India. I agree he was mesmerized by Nehru, and gave in without a fight.

  • @TheCANexus
    @TheCANexus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I hate Gandhi for what he could do but he didn't.

  • @n.chandrashekar9067
    @n.chandrashekar9067 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The fault Gandhi's of today have done more than 2 thousand mistakes an insult to the true Gandhi and a danger to our nation

  • @0369sweetp
    @0369sweetp 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There is no such thing as a mistake. It was destined to go that way,Gandhi choices was not mistake. As for Muslims and Hindus living peacefully that's not true, look back in Bharat history what Muslims did to non Muslims. Like British they all wanted to take over Bharat and have their religion being practiced..this is also a destiny. Not a mistake either like it or not.

  • @milascave2
    @milascave2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ghandia was also wrong in advocating the maintenance of the caste system. Yes, he did advocate treating untouchables better and giving them more respect. But he should have advocated its abolition, or at least not opposed it.

  • @MultiPopculture
    @MultiPopculture 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Partition is NOT bloodiest part of Indian history, Islamic conquests were. WAY worse....

  • @puneethhegdeable
    @puneethhegdeable 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well said!!!

  • @abhayjeetsingh6869
    @abhayjeetsingh6869 7 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    gandi is very good man that's why he destroyed indian culture innocently......

    • @abhayjeetsingh6869
      @abhayjeetsingh6869 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      hasmukh parmar I know gandhi and nehru sucks india.......
      I was tont on gandhi.... I hate secular people like gandhi nehru, etc....
      I love yogi adityanath , subramanyam swami, raja bhaiya etc.

    • @roshanmoodhoo2956
      @roshanmoodhoo2956 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      thanks today you have a prime minister like MODIjee

    • @MrDillbud
      @MrDillbud 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hasmukh parmar , MK Gandhi was vehemently against congress surviving after this half-baked independence that we got.He wanted to dissolve congress and have two new parties formed with 100 % Indian agenda and blood in them to run the country in a true democratic fashion . Yes, Sardar Patel was the County's one and only choice to be the first PM. There again , Gandhi failed the country and he asked Sardar Patel to decline to be the PM and let neru bhadwa be the Pm .

  • @seekeroftruth4619
    @seekeroftruth4619 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    excellent

  • @pankajbhamare1128
    @pankajbhamare1128 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3rd mistake even after separation of Pakistan based on Muslim religion. Allowing muslims to stay in India. Again same mistake is repeated while separation of Bangladesh.
    Because of these mistakes exodus of Kashmiri Pandit happened. Jihad is still there in Muslim communities even after separating two countries already.
    But revolution has begun from 2014. BJP following lead of Narendra Modi and Amit Shah started corrections democratic way.

  • @nibeditadas6145
    @nibeditadas6145 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I believe Gandhiji did a great service to the nation by agreeing to the partition. India is a place for people who respect all religions not for fanatics who have successfully eliminated the minority population from their country (Pakistan and Bangladesh). I also believe Gandhiji's greatest mistake was installing Nehru in power. Gandhiji went against all odds and fought everyone who came in between Nehru and Power. This unusual affinity towards one person over the country is very unsettling for me. Not many people talk about it but the greatest scam in independent India was the loot of INA treasury and the mastermind should not be a secret to us. The Coalgate, Bofors etc does not even hold a candle to the INA Treasury loot. My regret is after our Independence we had a clean slate to start from but Nehru sowed the seeds of nepotism,corruption, dishonesty, opportunism and inefficiency which is gnawing us even today. I don't care to be politically correct, Gandhi stood for this man and I can never stop resenting Mahatma Gandhi for this.

    • @panku16
      @panku16 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      For me Netaji Subash Chandra Bose is our real leader..

    • @lalaland122
      @lalaland122 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      U r 100% correct brother

    • @4dmanable
      @4dmanable 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your perspective. I’m in US but find this topic fascinating. President Trump is currently facing these world-changing decisions. May God be with him in these historic, biblical of times.

  • @nanjappa42
    @nanjappa42 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Such videos should have sub titles .
    Only two mistakes? Gandhi's whole life was full of mistakes. To recall some:
    1. His support to Khilafat united Indian Muslims and gave them a platform.
    2. Not a single Satyagraha programme of his was concluded or completed successfully. Salt SAtyagraha was an individual affair, but its aftermath was repression.
    3. His Quit India movement was a fiasco and a disaster, and was completely suppressed within six months.
    4. His parleys with Jinnah after coming out of jail were a fiasco, boosted the image of Jinnah and strengthened his position.
    5. He shamelessly obstructed Subhas Bose as President of Congress
    6. Most PCCs had chosen Sardar Patel as PM, but Gandhi imposed Nehru. All the economic and political problems of India are due to Nehru, who was a complete idiot, and a communist..
    7. Gandhi never understood the history of Islam and equated the invaders, looters and plunderers with the Hindus. In this respect, he was an ass.
    8. Gandhi destroyed the unity of India by advocating linguistic states.
    9. His advocacy of Hindi as national language has reduced non-Hindi speaking people as second-class citizens. India has become Hindia.
    10. Gandhi forgot that India was Bharat Mata. His idea of India did not have the consciousness of India as a spiritual power. His advocacy of all religions as true has hit Hinduism hard, and helped the aggressive Abrahamic religions. Gandhi is the true father of pseudo-secularism.
    Foolish HIndus sing 'Iswar Allah Tere Naam'. No sensible Muslim sings this.
    11. His advocacy of Ahimsa as political policy went phut when Pakistan invaded Kashmir .
    12. Gandhi engaged in antics, and never provided effective leadership or solution to any problem. After the fiasco of Quit India, his own partymen disliked him because he was incable of any creative idea or action.
    13.Gandhi might have been against Partition in theory, but all his actions moved in that direction. When Partition became inevitable, Gandhi or his foolish chela Nehru did not even know how and where exactly India was going to be divided. This led to lot of bloodshed and loss of life.
    India got Independence not because of Gandhi, but in spite of him.
    Our Independence was due to the changed situation after World War II.
    1. The World war made the British debtors, and India creditor. This was not acceptable to the colonists as they could no more loot. The economic advantage of keeping the colony was lost.
    2. The changed geo-political situation imposed new defence burdens on the colonial govt. They were not willing and able to bear this additional burden.
    3. The Rise of Netaji Subhas Bose electrified the Indian nation. His INA captured the imagination of the people. The Indian Army and Navy were electrified by this rise. Most Indian soldiers were enthusiastic about the INA. There was Naval Mutiny in Bombay. The British were alarmed, and realised that they could not take the loyalty of Indian soldiers and navymen for granted any more. So, they literally ran away.
    That is how we got our Independence, not due to Gandhi.
    This was admitted by former British PM Attlee during his visit to India. This has been recorded by our national historian R.C.Majumdar.
    Gandhi was personally a good man, but good for nothing leader.
    In the long run he did more harm than good, though unconsciously.
    All the current problems of India are due to Gandhi and his chela, Nehru.
    Dr.Ambedkar understood Islamic history and Muslim character better. He advocated that all Indian Muslims should go to Pakistan, and all Hindus there should come to India (exchange of population). Foolish Gandhi did not agree. Now, we have the world's third largest Muslim population in India, after Indonesia and Pakistan.( while Hindus in Pakistan have been decimated).
    Talk of Gandhi, we cannot recall one lasting good that he did for the nation. Any good he did was buried with him. His evil legacy remains.
    The evil that men do lives after them;
    The good is oft interred with their bones.

    • @Littlemoments123
      @Littlemoments123 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sir, u re great... Its very true... Gandhi is rowdy not mahatma... He is stupid fool who fooled India

  • @rajraja3054
    @rajraja3054 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nethaji Chandra bose who gave independence to india beside the great bhagat Singh.. there are the true freedom fighter..not ghandhi...

  • @OkusTenet
    @OkusTenet 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Win-win situation for musl!ms and overall loss for India. From 24% in subcontinent (1947) they became 35% (2022). Being 1/4th of population given 1/3rd of land.
    The saddest part is 10% out of total 35% in subcontinent are still in India despite giving vote for partition and seperate land comprising 18% of India's population.
    In comparison india was left with 9% Mus. after partition and Pak with 22% Hindus. Here the peacefuls multiplied 2 times and in Pak and Bangladesh they are diminished to 0.8% and 5% respectively.

  • @avaneesh108
    @avaneesh108 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We got indipendence bcuz of subhash chandrabose.

  • @suman1706
    @suman1706 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    India got independence because of INA... And the revolt of armed forces. It is absolutely clear now will many evidences. Gandhi and Nehru was along with Congress was just the beneficiary to transfer of power.

  • @sourimadatta613
    @sourimadatta613 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    People like Subhash Chandra Bose strongly defied Gandhi and Nehru when Gandhi agreed to partition India . In fact Bose even quit the Congress and started his own Azad Hind Movement due to the same reason . That is why I revere him so much .

  • @afrosamuri05
    @afrosamuri05 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I still blame those greedy, resource, power hungry red coats that invaded, pillaged and robbed the wealth from India in the first place. Blaming Ghandi for the mistakes is like blaming the liquor store for a drunk mans stupid behaviour.

  • @rookie9530
    @rookie9530 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What once stretched from Myanmar to Iran including Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan.

    • @nayanapatel1629
      @nayanapatel1629 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @mehmood mayet check Marya empire

  • @amandeep9930
    @amandeep9930 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nehru also done irreparable damage to India by making India socialist economy. Even after 75 years we are finding it difficult to reform our laws to make India more business friendly. Socialist regime of Congress did big blunder by nationalising many companies and banks.

  • @Chenducp
    @Chenducp ปีที่แล้ว

    Okay.... Gandhi didn't prevent partition. Thank him for that. Gandhi didn't promote his own family, he's not a promoter of nepotism. You can't accuse him of the turn of events in politics after many years of his death.

  • @njpravin
    @njpravin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Also there was no focus on the primary education immediately after independence. With a majority of population illiterate, if there was thrust on primary education it would have done wonders to the nation

  • @TheCANexus
    @TheCANexus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Gandhi's foundation was wrong altogether like if someone hit you a slap give them other chance to hit you again... that's cowardly act.. That's against bhagwad Geeta...
    He called maharana Pratap, Subhash Chandra bose, bhagat sinh misguided nationalists... 🤦🏻‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️🙆🏻‍♂️ Can you believe that..??
    Hindus aslo make him father of nation which is the biggest mistake..
    He sidelined Subhash Chandra bose...😡😠

  • @nitinsatghare5761
    @nitinsatghare5761 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    only two?????????????????????????

  • @samsams5289
    @samsams5289 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    AS JAY LAKHANI RIGHTFULLY PUT IT, GANDHI MADE TWO MAJOR MISTAKES..
    1. IF GANDHI, NEHRU & PATEL WOULD HAVE ACTED WITH A VISION AND RESISTED THE DEMANDS OF PARTITION MADE BY THE MUSLIM LEAGUE, THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT COULD HAVE REMAINED AS ONE ENTITY, WITH AUTONOMOUS STATES ALLLOCATED FOR THE MUSLIMS TO LIVE WITH DIGNITY.
    THIS WAY, THE MINDLESS MASSACRES, WHICH TOOK PLACE DURING THE PARTITION, COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED.
    NEHRU MADE COMPLETE BLUNDERS BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER THE INDEPENDENCE OF INDIA, WHICH PLUNGED INDIA INTO ANARCHY.

  • @trendy28
    @trendy28 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does this generation care about Gandhiji at all?. We must remove this subject from the school syllabus as soon as possible. History can be on the stage and seminars not in books. This is a new generation where children who have even become elders want to come out of gandhis and nehrus and live in the current society. Lets talk about how to build this to stay aligned with the rest of the world.

  • @ishanabhavsar
    @ishanabhavsar 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gandhi did Not want partition, he did try to stop it, but during that last year no one listened to him, including Nehru. Gandhi actually suggested that Jinnah become prime minister in a United India hence in a democratic india, public would elect their prime ministers after 5 years, which could have been Vallabhbhai or Nehru, who ever the people voted for. But others including Nehru lobby disagreed and they wanted Nehru to be prime minister. Jinnah too ultimately wanted nothing but Pakistan, as that trend still continues Globally, wanting separate Islamic states. So that is not Gandhi's mistake.

  • @akshaysanganwar5362
    @akshaysanganwar5362 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Partition was good for India...it should have been complete...

  • @abhikdey3633
    @abhikdey3633 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I DISAGREE SIR . NETAJI GOT US INDEPENDENCE . GANDHIJI SUPPORTED NEHRU WHO WAS A MONSTER

  • @rakeshjagdeo7330
    @rakeshjagdeo7330 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I totally disagree with you.
    The CASTE system has divided and continues to divided INDIA.

    • @jajaja7394
      @jajaja7394 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ofcrs when gandhis are paying thr media to promote caste system,it will only flourish! Modi's win was a big punch on the ppl who used to say ppl vote on the basis of caste! When uneducated and under developed states like UP and bihar voted in millions for Modi irrespective of thr caste,none of the left media appreciated it!Infact,a day after election and a day after the Modi's oath,newspapers like the hindu,times of india etc were printing articles with headings like "how many brahmins or dalits did modi chose to be a part of his cabinet"!Can u blv it?!Congress and left want to unite only the non hindus for votes and always try to malign and disintegrate the hindus! Thr are are no.of malpractices in islam and christianity like triple talak,halala,terrorism,missionaries,discrimination and brainwashing kids in catholic schools etc but no one covers that and raise a voice against it!This is the hypocrisy we live!Look at the growing numbers of jiahdis and missionaries in South and north east india! Kerala is necoming the hub of ISIS!Caste system is nothing in front of issues like media hypocrisy,jihad,missionaries,anti india NGOs,naxalism,terrorism etc! Update yr limited knowledge before commenting sir!

    • @msdolly6101981
      @msdolly6101981 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The caste system existed much before any of the invaders stepped on Indian soil. Dont blame everything on caste system. Its not the system thats the problem, its the descrimination based on system is the problem. And dont be so naive to believe caste system exists only among hindus.

    • @user-kt3jn7wx5f
      @user-kt3jn7wx5f 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@msdolly6101981 Thanxxx...there r lots of people who blame it on the caste system..caste system is nothing but the people's skill n based on these skill...a person gain an identity.. it's same as Doctor, enginnering or soldier... it's just a language translation people have started to think that they have come out of the system but the truth is they'll never come out of this bcoz it's all about the person's skill..I wonder tomorrow when they have to marry or cremating dead body who will they call them at that time👃👃👃

    • @user-kt3jn7wx5f
      @user-kt3jn7wx5f 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's just the discrimination that happens n this discrimination was never before the Britishers came even in our Kashmiri n Dogra society discrimination never existed at all..we still don't have it... it's just limited to certain areas n that's bcoz of politics n people think it's all over Bharat..lol👃👃👃

  • @rahulkeni8801
    @rahulkeni8801 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Dear Sir, I feel Gandhi was not capable of stopping partition. Jinnah was way to powerful

  • @rahulkeney5354
    @rahulkeney5354 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just Imagine Undivided India....
    Afghanistan would have been our neighbour...
    We have so much trouble dealing with our current neighbour Pakistan. How would we have dealt with Taliban and Osama as neighbours???????

  • @bigfanpavan3988
    @bigfanpavan3988 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We are happy for the split. Other wise we would have not achieved anything.

  • @nadarTelevision
    @nadarTelevision 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great

  • @balunallaperumal4491
    @balunallaperumal4491 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    YES!! 1000000000000%. Right! Gotse's action had been justified! If Gandhi lived longer I ndia would have been divided further into pieces.
    As an Individual, Gandhi deserved to be called a Mahatma though. But succumbed to Nehru's personal ambitions even overruled the congress party.