Integrated Rate Law: First Order Reaction

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ก.ย. 2024
  • A first order reaction has integrated rate law
    [A] = [A]0 e^(-kt)
    which is the same as ln [A] = -kt + ln [A]0
    Which means a graph of ln [A] vs time will give a line with slope -k and a y-intercept of ln [A]0.
    Check me out: www.chemistnate...

ความคิดเห็น • 142

  • @manahelh.6104
    @manahelh.6104 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    this man made feel home, taught me something and was super nice during all of it. Teachers can really learn from him

  • @Shaftell
    @Shaftell 9 ปีที่แล้ว +262

    It's stupid how the chem teachers on TH-cam can teach and explain things better than my chem professor at one of Canada's top universities.

    • @maleehakhan1494
      @maleehakhan1494 9 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      +Shaftell lol I know right, I have no idea what my university prof taught me. They care more about the quantity of material that they deliver, not the quality.

    • @cromaniac96
      @cromaniac96 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      +Shaftell do you see how long this video is? 5 minutes is pretty long for something as trivial as integrating (which is btw math not chemistry) an expression. A professor at university cannot explain 1200 pages of literature in detail like this video is, in a given time of his class.

    • @icygrlsta7933
      @icygrlsta7933 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I second that

    • @manutinka2111
      @manutinka2111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Welcome to earth

    • @sihoonoh9021
      @sihoonoh9021 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      came to think about it, that is the most selfish yet efficient way for universities to teach their undergraduate students, the mediocre will fall behind and the really smart ones will rise to the surface that way it automatically decides who to keep, all this while being lazy. Actually you will eventually need to learn by yourself at higher levels and if you can't figure out this kind of stuff on your own you are probably not meant for academics. When I go to university, I think ill get most of my tuition if the professor zeroes in on one of the class materials and walk me through his or her thought process from the basics to deeper things. WIth that way of thinking in my mind. I will try to do other parts on my own.

  • @findandgetanything
    @findandgetanything 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You are literally saving me from flunking my chemistry semester examination! Thank You!

    • @manzarnoman3270
      @manzarnoman3270 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      bro have you graduated now...its been 5 years

  • @SirPerfectful
    @SirPerfectful 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    AP Chemistry test tomorrow. YOU have no idea how much you have helped me. Thank you very much!

    • @cursedswordsman
      @cursedswordsman 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whoa now, you have Calculus in your AP Chem class? We don't at all and it's not on the AP test. I'm just looking this up for fun.

    • @SirPerfectful
      @SirPerfectful 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      cursedswordsman
      The Calculus is the derivation of the formula. Don't worry about the derivation, just memorize!

    • @cursedswordsman
      @cursedswordsman 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      SirPerfectful That's my plan, I'm just wondering how this would have helped you on your AP Chem test.

    • @SirPerfectful
      @SirPerfectful 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      cursedswordsman The fact that I now know it.

    • @maggiefei1995
      @maggiefei1995 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      SirPerfectful Omg mine is this coming Monday. Between ChemistNate and Bozeman Science, I've learned the whole AP chem curriculum basically. Bless them both! How was your exam btw?

  • @SpringsCarnation
    @SpringsCarnation 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Well done explaining integrated rate law. Was really easy to follow, helpful, and funny!

  • @zarmeenakhtar
    @zarmeenakhtar 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    who needs angels when you're there

  • @_midaz_
    @_midaz_ 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    your vibes are so positive about something so boring, you made it so easy to understand. Amazing video !

  • @kiranrao9625
    @kiranrao9625 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    chemistNATE is SO underrated, his teaching is SO clear and helpful!

  • @nikimohammadzadeh9409
    @nikimohammadzadeh9409 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THIS VIDEO LITERALLY SAVED MY LIFE AND EXPLAINED THIS BETTER THAN MY CHEM PROFESSOR BLESS YOUR SOUL

  • @sanchitsingh7162
    @sanchitsingh7162 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    content on this channel is fun to watch

  • @oladipupooladele3647
    @oladipupooladele3647 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love how you got excited at the ending part
    You've given me hope🤩🥺🥺

  • @gideonjeconeah8301
    @gideonjeconeah8301 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much sir, it really help me with my pharmacokinetic subject

  • @navid617
    @navid617 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thx, I love your humor.. I can see you prosper as a teacher....

  • @The_MatEngineer
    @The_MatEngineer 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    to be precise: the rate of a reaction is directly proportional to the concentration of a reactant. The k is used merely to equate the two.

    • @mechikaboombayah4960
      @mechikaboombayah4960 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mathew Garcia yeah... Obviously
      To equate two proportionals you obviously need a constant
      Otherwise how can you?

  • @savvy4915
    @savvy4915 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    impressive personality combined with good teaching skills.

  • @appleseed3456
    @appleseed3456 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you. Very easy to understand. Love the connection to the linear function graph.

  • @VSPG_SIVANI
    @VSPG_SIVANI 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My teacher made 'k' the subject and gave the equation like this: k=(1/t)ln([A_°]/[A_t]). Anyways, she also taught us your last equation😊

  • @5gallonsofwater495
    @5gallonsofwater495 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you for existing man

  • @KiddSmiley96
    @KiddSmiley96 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Best video out there. Needed this for my christmas coursework, thanks :)

  • @kbarry2295
    @kbarry2295 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video thank you for actually explaining the steps for integration instead of just listing the formula like other videos

  • @to181
    @to181 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Nate! I'm a biochemistry major and I love doing kinetics problems but I'm frustrated that I don't know how to go from a rate law to this y = mx + b form.... What do you suggest? I took calc in high school I'm just rusty as a nail. Thanks Nate!

    • @cesaralejandrojimenezmay4104
      @cesaralejandrojimenezmay4104 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It might be late but i will answer anyways. I recommend you to read the art of problem solving: introduction to algebra. It helped me a lot to understand the rate law in terms of y=mx + b. It doesn´t tell you the answer immediately but instead forces you to think. But don't worry if it seems hard for you, the book itself helps you by suggesting what steps you could take to solve a problem. The topic of interest (graph and lines) is the number 8 but you had better read it from topic 1 if you want to understand everything better because almost all lessons are intertwined to keep track the incoming knowledge. On the other hand, if you are struggling only with the calculus part, then only I can do is suggest to read any calculus book

    • @kruthi1975
      @kruthi1975 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cesaralejandrojimenezmay4104 4 years too late hahah, love the enthusiasm in your reply

  • @7mikekim2
    @7mikekim2 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm in the way of reading Larry Gonick's cartoon book on chemistry. This vid was helpful. Many thanks.

  • @bios546
    @bios546 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Ur t looks like plus + got me confused there 4 some time.

  • @zarmeenakhtar
    @zarmeenakhtar 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    also I love the markers u use keep that high

  • @rehabsonbol9696
    @rehabsonbol9696 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks
    I have been searching long time for this integration

  • @chocolatecrud
    @chocolatecrud 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very nicely done, thanks for this!

  • @TheChemisch
    @TheChemisch 8 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    stop calling natural log lawn...

    • @Kidchipy
      @Kidchipy 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      +brandon Somerville even my math professor calls it that and he's been teaching calculus since the 1980's.... it's not wrong...

    • @TheChemisch
      @TheChemisch 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      it is.

    • @abdullahpurewalgmail
      @abdullahpurewalgmail 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Kidchipy IN Punjabi language lawn is a very bad term.

    • @mechikaboombayah4960
      @mechikaboombayah4960 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Brandon s ln is lawn
      Log is log
      Also using both are correct
      Take a chill pill Einstein!

    • @stevenphiri8041
      @stevenphiri8041 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHA I THOUGHT I WAS WRONG.

  • @anitachoudhary8154
    @anitachoudhary8154 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Super explanation..
    l am from india

  • @to181
    @to181 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've been trying to figure this calculus out. I understand kinetics and all but not this integrating thing.. I am confused as to what happened to d[A] and what does -d[A]/dt mean and where did it come from? THANKS NATE!

    • @to181
      @to181 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ok, does the "d" represent delta or change in.. Now im just curious how you got rid of the d[A] that is on the other side of the integrated 1/[A]... I appreciate it.

    • @Lukinhas2012lk
      @Lukinhas2012lk 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I didn't get it either

    • @BeepingSheep
      @BeepingSheep 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tyler Obermark d[A] means he's integrating with respect to the concentration of A.
      Remember your identities:
      ∫1/x dx = ln(x)

  • @Tom-Fusillo
    @Tom-Fusillo 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love the enthusiasm

  • @afiqrosli974
    @afiqrosli974 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is " ln [A]0 = kt + ln [A] " the same as " ln [A] = -kt + ln [A]0 " ?

  • @muhammadzeeshanqasim4017
    @muhammadzeeshanqasim4017 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its like a sight for sore eyes, I have the whole idea, but I am seeking how it would be realted to half life, though a plethoraof videos are outthere with (K=1/halflife). Since, most of the research articles employ first order rate to depict how the pollutant concentration over time, how it can be achieved when we have only final and initial concentrations, and change in time, and how to find K and half life?

  • @semishady1873
    @semishady1873 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this stop motion or something?

  • @ainenimhurchu2706
    @ainenimhurchu2706 10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Could you please do a video on Pseudo-First Order reactions?

  • @VTechvm
    @VTechvm 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You made it so easy!!! Thanks a lot

  • @kimberlykris5103
    @kimberlykris5103 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    my prof made it ln[a_t]/ln[b_0] = -kt but she didn't teach us that equation :/ either way I still don't get most of my professor's lecture

  • @chutkisir5859
    @chutkisir5859 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like the way you explain with lot's of energy

  • @nurdayana2427
    @nurdayana2427 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    can somebody help me to integrate rate law for 1.5 order.. my lecturer always find a way to make the thing become complicated

  • @ruthporter1102
    @ruthporter1102 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about if you had a rate equation that was rate=-k[A][B]

  • @MathTronics
    @MathTronics 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Too much Helpful !

  • @brellaj3206
    @brellaj3206 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is the video I'm looking for! Thanks man!

  • @shanmugam9454
    @shanmugam9454 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir ur explanation is so nice tq

  • @theAdisilvestro
    @theAdisilvestro 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    integration you did was extremely helpful to visualize, thanks!

  • @TheQueenofNeckbeards
    @TheQueenofNeckbeards 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    great explanation :D

  • @zaackjet123
    @zaackjet123 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    do you think you can briefly describe to me what the t and 0 mean on the integral notation?

    • @penumono
      @penumono 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      t=0, ie time for initial rate of reaction and t means time after reaction is completed.

    • @mechikaboombayah4960
      @mechikaboombayah4960 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thus According to the previous comment
      It means that you are going from 0 to t

  • @ferdinandp21
    @ferdinandp21 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks bro that was really helpful!

  • @bangdingvandesteeg9250
    @bangdingvandesteeg9250 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks bro, you solve my problem immediately

  • @johnbrennan3810
    @johnbrennan3810 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great stuff. Well done.

  • @poojakannan4306
    @poojakannan4306 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great teaching

  • @kiranrao9625
    @kiranrao9625 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This an amazing video. All your videos are so helpful!

  • @daniels8460
    @daniels8460 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    "You tell me... and you're right! Because you're smart!" I don't tell you anything and I have no idea what you did, but there is one thing I do know... I'm retaking chem II because I don't get this crap at all. My brain shuts off and all I hear is Charlie Brown's teacher.

  • @justrinat2207
    @justrinat2207 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I HATE when Leibniz derivative notation is treated as a fraction. It isn't! You can't just move about dt as you please.

  • @noem7503
    @noem7503 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4hours in class and i didn t get a shit..5:05 min and i do : Thank you soooo much ! Clear explaination Thank God! God bless you my friend!

  • @hannahdivic28
    @hannahdivic28 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What does ln mean? You said “lon??” What is that?

    • @rupsa9432
      @rupsa9432 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Natural log...log base e

  • @lejonbrames2101
    @lejonbrames2101 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks but I had one question which still confuses me. You did the indefinite integral first, but later added showed the definite integral by having an interval. On the left side, you integrated with respect to variable [A], but your interval is in terms of t. Shouldn't it be in terms of [A]? Sry, just learned integrals in calc 1 so it's still pretty new stuff

    • @RexGalilae
      @RexGalilae 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can take the definite integral of both sides from 0 to t. And that's what he meant to do. And it's ok if you want to write 0 to t in terms of A on the left hand side, rewriting the limits as A_initial and A_final.
      What matters is the time interval. On the right side, the time interval decides what value dt is going to take, whereas on the left side, this interval decides what's going to happen to [A].
      tbh, it's easier to explain when in person than when you're online. I agree that he didn't use the notations as strictly as its done in our math classes, which is what left you confused.

    • @RexGalilae
      @RexGalilae 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can show this to your chem or math teacher and he'll explain it to you. Idk about your school but we had this part in both math (In our differential eqtns chapter) and chemistry. So yeah.

  • @saravananm3565
    @saravananm3565 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow . You made it easy man !

  • @prs901
    @prs901 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow

  • @s75634
    @s75634 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU SIR SO MUCH !!!!

  • @tshepanangvissagie6789
    @tshepanangvissagie6789 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    diz guys on youtube explain more dan my professor

  • @stevenphiri8041
    @stevenphiri8041 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    BRILLIANT

  • @icygrlsta7933
    @icygrlsta7933 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wow this is awesome thank you

  • @craftwithkalyani692
    @craftwithkalyani692 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Convert in log10

  • @soumitabandyopadhyay934
    @soumitabandyopadhyay934 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My book has it printed wrong 🙄 thank you for your help!!!!😂

  • @generalfacts113
    @generalfacts113 ปีที่แล้ว

    First time on this Chennal..
    It is really op

  • @sarahelmaaz5270
    @sarahelmaaz5270 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    amazingggg.... Its really helful in understing this all and Also interesting... thanks for uploading Sir...

  • @neethy1836
    @neethy1836 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    beautifully explained thankyouuuuuu

  • @sheyhan1
    @sheyhan1 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much. it was very helpful

  • @matthewdoughty947
    @matthewdoughty947 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    "This Marker is CRAP"
    xDDDD

  • @jasonko1295
    @jasonko1295 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    TQ so much!

  • @DanielParker-q2x
    @DanielParker-q2x 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    are you saying lawn? :o

    • @chemistNATE
      @chemistNATE  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, that’s Canada !

  • @maimadavid5462
    @maimadavid5462 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    WELL EXPLAINED!

  • @p.x9040
    @p.x9040 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @noori6982
    @noori6982 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you!

  • @NirjhorKabir
    @NirjhorKabir 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks a lot dude... :-)

  • @NoobonSteroids
    @NoobonSteroids 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    [Excellent i want a heart' now ]

  • @mukupogulashivanand2777
    @mukupogulashivanand2777 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice

  • @pngvvn
    @pngvvn 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    really helpful !!!!

  • @Krn_swami
    @Krn_swami 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Osm bro ur best

  • @rajathbhat2337
    @rajathbhat2337 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanx that helped alot

  • @rashaali9866
    @rashaali9866 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanx 💓

  • @priyaasati3266
    @priyaasati3266 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    kuch samjh nahi aya

  • @abhilashasharma049
    @abhilashasharma049 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You saved my ass bro.... Thanks a lot 😋

  • @alvingeorge123345
    @alvingeorge123345 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    you remind me of sheldon cooper

    • @mechikaboombayah4960
      @mechikaboombayah4960 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Alvin George his voice sounds exactly like him
      I thought I am the Only one who thought that😂😂

  • @chinjoo
    @chinjoo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2:02 indians 😱😱😱😱😱

  • @Dharshxn
    @Dharshxn หลายเดือนก่อน

    From India

  • @Abua7med505
    @Abua7med505 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love you

  • @crazyjack333
    @crazyjack333 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ap chem final soon... fml

  • @matthewc7138
    @matthewc7138 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yay differential equations

  • @Fiza2kkk
    @Fiza2kkk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mander

  • @avx0966
    @avx0966 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wrong

  • @vagdevi_0
    @vagdevi_0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thankyou!(人 •͈ᴗ•͈)

  • @greengoat9740
    @greengoat9740 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you are the oil

  • @human7314
    @human7314 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super super super super super super

  • @ismailsevimli6424
    @ismailsevimli6424 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Men I am not stupid :))))))