This is correct and how they manage to "legally" do this is in multiple facets of law, including "family" law. The legislature makes laws for everyone... you voted for the legislature. This, to them, is the extent of due process. Its absolutely abhorrent and unconstitutional. But whatcha gonna do about it?
@@davidcraig9779 I understand the sentiment all too well sir. But in all honesty I hope it doesn't come to that. I fear the time to pick up the sword is near.
@@ernestorodriguez2404 I saw the same video. Another lesson to be learned is that if a person is doing something legitimate and is going to be having deposits totaling over 10,000, it's better to wait and deposit over that amount on purpose to avoid any structuring issues. I sold my inheritance from my father that lived in Mexico and my sister is paying me in cash so I am going to definitely deposit it all at once.
Most forfeitures are a few thousand dollars, low enough where it cost more to hire a lawyer to get it back . I think this is their strategy. Millions of those and you are talking billions of dollars. Wouldn't that be structuring on the governments part ?
Wouldn't you think that if their tax returns showed all these cash deposits were reported on their books and all taxes were paid, what's the problem? Also, how can the people, and they are people, do this in good conscience? Don't they know it's wrong? If they don't, how on earth could they not know this is wrong? Especially under the guise of "justice".
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." I don't see any exceptions there made for "because it's civil, not criminal" or "except for this bureaucracy". Just sayin.
Den’s have never cared of followed the Constitution. It’s there way of Criminalizing law abiding Citizens, why else are they fighting for more and more IRS agents. Obama pushed and signed a bill increasing their numbers, now OBiden is doing the same. They have always weaponized anything they could to become a more powerful as dictators.
@@dockilljoy9017 Republicans aren't any better. There's a couple, but not a whole lot. Massie seems like a pretty decent dude, and Ron Paul - but there's just not that many of them.
When I had my restaurant the bank told us keep deposit of cash below 10k?? Friday Saturday and Sunday intake would be deposited on Monday mostly cash we would split the deposits thought that's what the bank wanted? Looks like they could have gotten us in trouble?
Oh, so this is just the result of the US's boneheaded idea of giving seized money to the agency's that seize it. This money should simply go into a country, or state, pot to be distributed with the main budget. It's insanity to give these agencies incentives to take money from citizens.
Yeah it’s just like RICO and the civil forfeiture that the police do. They take all kinds of things. I remember there was a man who had the cash from his family restaurant and he got stopped for something and the cops took all the cash because they thought this old man who owned a Chinese restaurant was some sort of criminal. It’s insane that the organisations that seize property gets to keep it. I mean, that just seems like it would breed problems…
I've never had $10K to deposit at any single point in time. Does that mean I'm structuring my deposits? I can't help but to believe spontaneous order > central planning.
I think an altering of incentives is needed. 1.) Require an actual conviction before the seized money can be kept. And require this conviction to occur within 36 months. Failing that, the money should be returned, with the same interest as the IRS charges on late tax payments. 2.) Let the agency keep only 25‰ for itself, the rest must go to the federal general funds. None can be kicked back to state or local governments. 3.) make prosicutoral misconduct a crime with a 5 year recommended sentence, and a felony rap that takes at least 10 years to expunge. And this is coming from a person whom is highly suspicious of "property rights". As much as I am paranoid about large property owners (corporations) trampling my rights, I am just as paranoid about out-of-control government agencies (ambitious, lawless prosecutors) doing the same.
Is the only way to avoid the appearance of "structuring" to make deposits in excess of $10,000? We have to save our deposits until we get $10,000 together?
yes so that they can confiscate your money at the local level, or you risk the visit from the masked bandit (sometimes they're not even cops) to lift the burdensome cash from your person.
These unjust seizures need to be paid back with an additional "opportunity cost" and interest. Capitalist economies arose because of the frugal accumulation accomplished by individuals. Just diligence on the part of some people creates opportunities for others who have a work ethic. Money is at it's foundation fungible testament of value coupled to a specie of tangible comparison. The truth will come out. On a similar note, if it weren't for anti-cannabis laws there would be a lot more qualified candidates for military and law enforcement careers.
The militia that has become the police doesn’t WANT qualified people. They want THUGS to do their every bidding while they have the police unions and qualified immunity to back up their buggery....errrr thuggery. And this means all levels of law enforcement. Take take and take some more is what they do.
the people need to take power and gov't... then they need to round all those IRS people up and put them in jail for many years... and sieze their assets also ;)
Here's a better idea. Don't live in a backwards country like the US. Also if you were born there renounce your citizenship, the US will still tax you even if your not living there.
@@TheAkashicTraveller this is true but it costs almost $2500 to renounce your citizenship. The next highest amount from any country that does this charges you less than $400. The US is a corporation. A business with profit motives that doesn't serve the investors but the managers.
I don't understand why structuring is illegal as long as your taxes at the end of year matches up with your bank account. The money you deposited and what you report to IRS matches up then all good, why does it matter how much you deposit at one time?
I’m literally watching this video because I just heard about a baker who had them take 68k out of his account and then say he owes almost 200k in fines. And I have NO idea what he did wrong besides deposit $ that was less than 10k. And now listening to this it’s insane. EVERYONE makes deposits less than 10k!! I could see if every deposit was like $9,999, otherwise, GTFO.
What if everyone that has $10,000 or more in the bank withdraw and deposit it over and over and over again to MESS with the IRS. This is an unreasonable search and seizure.
The bs narrative they use is that the money 💵 can’t be jailed, so it doesn’t have a presumption of innocence; the owner must instead “prove” the money 💵 is perfectly legal. Which is expensive, difficult, or even sometimes impossible. Greatest country in the world my ass. Makes decent people want to scream 😱. Civil forfeiture is theft. If a person doesn’t get convicted, then they should be entitled to everything back plus interest and damages. Unreal.
This is likethe King making a law to make a crime out of something ordinary just to go after someone just because you don't like them, or because they want your money or property!!
Easy way to stop civil forfeiture: make any seized money be held in an interest-bearing account for a period not exceeding 1 year, then after a criminal conviction, transfer that money to a charity. Any charity wishing to accept any money must have full transparency on all their accounting, with ANY donations or payments made to any agency with the ability to perform asset seizures disqualifying that charity from receiving any seizure money. If charges are not brought against the person whose assets are seized within a reasonable amount of time (3 months? 6 months?), assets must be returned to the original owner, with any interest accrued. It's crystal clear to anyone paying attention that civil forfeiture is being used as a source of income. Take away that potential income, and you take away the motive for agencies to seize it in the first place.
OK, one question is in my mind right off the bat. Who passed these laws? When did they pass these laws? What makes these unconstitutional laws permissible and defensible in a court of law? No Supreme Court challenges? If congress passed these laws, what was their intention? I guess I will have to study the history of these laws and find a way to overturn these laws.
They got a grand mother. Her crime. She with drew 8000 three times to give a gift to three grand kids. She wanted it seperated by the bank. nope, your a criminal. You should have pulled 24k all at once. It's very sickening.
These laws were passed in the 1980s while Reagan was in office. They remain on the books because lower courts uphold them. The time and expense involved in repeated appeals gradually wears down plaintiffs through attrition so eventually they just cut their losses, drop the suits and give up. We are always told you can't fight the system. Well, you can fight but you will always lose
It's a nice platitude, isn't it? People who are incarcerated before their arraignment are essentially innocent people being held against their will, in the land of the free.
My bank just accused me of doing this today when I was withdrawing 15,000 of my own money that I earned at my own job because I wanted to give a friend a loan and I didn’t do it all at once
If you want to drive 70 but go 55 to avoid the hassle of a ticket, that's normal. If you have $12,000 but only deposit $9,900 to avoid the hassle of a form, that's a crime. So remember, the next time you want to drive 70, it might be a federal crime not to.
" If you have $12,000 but only deposit $9,900 to avoid the hassle of a form, that's a crime." That is not a crime. If you deposit just under $10,000 CONSISTENTLY, and cannot show how/why you do that, then it may be a possible crime. For example, if you have a small business and make a monthly deposit of between $8,000 to $9,000 (as supported by your business accounting system), NOBODY has the right to misjudge you as a criminal and size you money. NOBODY HAS THAT RIGHT.
Get the book, Crscink the CodeZ, by Peter Hendrickson. He never lost a case against the I.R.S. By the way, the I.R.S. is private company under contract to work for THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, which is not the same legal entity as "The Government of the United States of Americs. GET THAT BOOK.
What if I am depositing frequent cash earnings, such as $300-500 weekly. Will this be considered structuring after a few months when the overall amount hits 10k? If so, should I just wait until I have 10k and deposit it all at once? I would hate to keep cash that long at home
THEFT by any agent under color of law to take rights/property without a proper warrant covered under Title 18 of the US Codes. THERE is & must be a remedy in order for a code to be called law. It is finding out what the remedy is and how to apply it.
They were only going to take money from drug dealers, because drug dealers had so much cash they could afford lawyers that would get them off. It sounds wrong to deprive the accused of the ability to defend himself, but at least the government is admitting you're only entitled to as much justice as you can afford.
Law is just a pretext to kill steal and destroy Ergo gain advantage over others who don't know the intricacies of laws like you do or cannot comprehend or understand your private interpretation of the law
Careful friend, I think you're seeing behind the curtain! They (the power hungry, don't want others to succeed) aren't to happy with you. 100% agree with you!
Equitable sharing. Now who could be against equitable sharing? Your mother wasn't against equitable sharing when she raised you and your siblings in fact she encouraged equitable sharing. Such a wonderful thing this equitable sharing.
I understand the logic of the law because I have seen small businesses evade great sums of money by not accepting credit cards and keeping paper books instead of electronic accounting. However, what the IRS should do is to lobby for laws to obligate the small business to have electronic accounting and credit cards within a reasonable time period. Then prosecute but not the other way around. There are always meritable cases where the IRS has failed to properly apply the law, but the majority of cases are fraudulent activities. No offense but I don't patronize cash-only businesses. There are a lot of people that only pay on cash for the same reasons so they don't need my business anyway.
I don't take credit cards. I do take mostly checks and some people pay cash. I don't like paying 30$ on a thousand $sale, when there is no benefit to my business. I get more then i can do. I don't think you own a business.
We're the only car and truck repair shop in an area of 1000's of square miles. We don't take credit or debit cards. They rip us off. If your car or truck breaks down you bring it to us; we're the only game in town. If you won't pay cash or check tough patootie, then you're a walking sob
![[Full] 4 ต่อ 4 Celebrity EP.920 | 3 พ.ย. 67 | one31](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KwiW2M_kAg4/mqdefault.jpg)
"...No one shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process..."
This is correct and how they manage to "legally" do this is in multiple facets of law, including "family" law. The legislature makes laws for everyone... you voted for the legislature. This, to them, is the extent of due process. Its absolutely abhorrent and unconstitutional. But whatcha gonna do about it?
@@jamesseeker1538 Warning will not be given.
@@davidcraig9779 I understand the sentiment all too well sir. But in all honesty I hope it doesn't come to that. I fear the time to pick up the sword is near.
@@jamesseeker1538 :)
Why not? Power comes from the barrel of a gun, mao.
This says to me: don't put your money in the bank, but a good safe and be your own bank. Just put enough in the bank to pay your bills and that's it.
Also never transport your money in an obvious way because the police will conviscate it
Thats exactly how I operate
Fasho buy assets, it just loses value sitting in savings all year
@@borislavignatov5499 I watched a video of a cop taking a veterans lifesaving and now I'm here
@@ernestorodriguez2404 I saw the same video. Another lesson to be learned is that if a person is doing something legitimate and is going to be having deposits totaling over 10,000, it's better to wait and deposit over that amount on purpose to avoid any structuring issues. I sold my inheritance from my father that lived in Mexico and my sister is paying me in cash so I am going to definitely deposit it all at once.
Why hasn't SCOTUS declared that seizing property without due process is unconstitutional? This seems like a no brainer.
Most forfeitures are a few thousand dollars, low enough where it cost more to hire a lawyer to get it back . I think this is their strategy. Millions of those and you are talking billions of dollars. Wouldn't that be structuring on the governments part ?
Great point!!
How do you determine intention? It's so easy to assume that depositors are deliberately depositing multiple times to avoid triggering the paperwork
Wouldn't you think that if their tax returns showed all these cash deposits were reported on their books and all taxes were paid, what's the problem? Also, how can the people, and they are people, do this in good conscience? Don't they know it's wrong? If they don't, how on earth could they not know this is wrong? Especially under the guise of "justice".
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
I don't see any exceptions there made for "because it's civil, not criminal" or "except for this bureaucracy". Just sayin.
Den’s have never cared of followed the Constitution. It’s there way of Criminalizing law abiding Citizens, why else are they fighting for more and more IRS agents. Obama pushed and signed a bill increasing their numbers, now OBiden is doing the same. They have always weaponized anything they could to become a more powerful as dictators.
@@dockilljoy9017 Republicans aren't any better. There's a couple, but not a whole lot. Massie seems like a pretty decent dude, and Ron Paul - but there's just not that many of them.
When I had my restaurant the bank told us keep deposit of cash below 10k??
Friday Saturday and Sunday intake would be deposited on Monday mostly cash we would split the deposits thought that's what the bank wanted? Looks like they could have gotten us in trouble?
I think allot of people get in trouble when the bank sees 6,7,8,9 deposits they do suspicious activity reports and the IRS picks up on it.
"Sorry Sir, but you were driving 63 in a 65, I'm going to have to place you under arrest because I think you intend to do 70".
Tyranny in other forms is still tyranny.
Oh, so this is just the result of the US's boneheaded idea of giving seized money to the agency's that seize it. This money should simply go into a country, or state, pot to be distributed with the main budget. It's insanity to give these agencies incentives to take money from citizens.
Yeah it’s just like RICO and the civil forfeiture that the police do. They take all kinds of things. I remember there was a man who had the cash from his family restaurant and he got stopped for something and the cops took all the cash because they thought this old man who owned a Chinese restaurant was some sort of criminal. It’s insane that the organisations that seize property gets to keep it. I mean, that just seems like it would breed problems…
I've never had $10K to deposit at any single point in time. Does that mean I'm structuring my deposits? I can't help but to believe spontaneous order > central planning.
It could mean you are structuring. If it is done within a short period of time and your bank reports you, then you're in trouble.
@donmakavelli1626 Thank you for the reply 3 years later when time = money.
I think an altering of incentives is needed.
1.) Require an actual conviction before the seized money can be kept. And require this conviction to occur within 36 months. Failing that, the money should be returned, with the same interest as the IRS charges on late tax payments.
2.) Let the agency keep only 25‰ for itself, the rest must go to the federal general funds. None can be kicked back to state or local governments.
3.) make prosicutoral misconduct a crime with a 5 year recommended sentence, and a felony rap that takes at least 10 years to expunge.
And this is coming from a person whom is highly suspicious of "property rights".
As much as I am paranoid about large property owners (corporations) trampling my rights, I am just as paranoid about out-of-control government agencies (ambitious, lawless prosecutors) doing the same.
Is the only way to avoid the appearance of "structuring" to make deposits in excess of $10,000? We have to save our deposits until we get $10,000 together?
yes so that they can confiscate your money at the local level, or you risk the visit from the masked bandit (sometimes they're not even cops) to lift the burdensome cash from your person.
that wouild be my suggestion
These unjust seizures need to be paid back with an additional "opportunity cost" and interest. Capitalist economies arose because of the frugal accumulation accomplished by individuals. Just diligence on the part of some people creates opportunities for others who have a work ethic. Money is at it's foundation fungible testament of value coupled to a specie of tangible comparison. The truth will come out.
On a similar note, if it weren't for anti-cannabis laws there would be a lot more qualified candidates for military and law enforcement careers.
The militia that has become the police doesn’t WANT qualified people. They want THUGS to do their every bidding while they have the police unions and qualified immunity to back up their buggery....errrr thuggery.
And this means all levels of law enforcement.
Take take and take some more is what they do.
the people need to take power and gov't... then they need to round all those IRS people up and put them in jail for many years... and sieze their assets also ;)
Don't keep your money in a bank.
Here's a better idea. Don't live in a backwards country like the US. Also if you were born there renounce your citizenship, the US will still tax you even if your not living there.
@@TheAkashicTraveller this is true but it costs almost $2500 to renounce your citizenship. The next highest amount from any country that does this charges you less than $400. The US is a corporation. A business with profit motives that doesn't serve the investors but the managers.
You put your money into bitcoin in one transaction and then sell to another shell you've set up and keep all your money
I don't understand why structuring is illegal as long as your taxes at the end of year matches up with your bank account. The money you deposited and what you report to IRS matches up then all good, why does it matter how much you deposit at one time?
FrostyExchange You suppose they are not crooks . They are worse then the mob.
The worst part is you have to fight to get it back, and that costs MONEY. Even if you win, it could cost you more than you are going to get back.
So much for freedom...
I wonder how many billionaires this happens too. They don't pay taxes and they don't do property seizures
IRS needs to go after the corporations not the little guy! Corrupt all the way from the top!
So, what is the solution to corrupt police, lawyers and govt. seizing money from innocent people.
I’m literally watching this video because I just heard about a baker who had them take 68k out of his account and then say he owes almost 200k in fines. And I have NO idea what he did wrong besides deposit $ that was less than 10k. And now listening to this it’s insane. EVERYONE makes deposits less than 10k!! I could see if every deposit was like $9,999, otherwise, GTFO.
I like it better when I was a child, it was easier to believe in my country then
Best idea, don't use a bank.
Then they seize it because u have too much cash
This is why a lot of people are saying the hell with banks
"People fight for what they have the least." And the US sure does like to fight for freedom.
You nailed it. Land Of The Free is just a lyric not a reality.
What if everyone that has $10,000 or more in the bank withdraw and deposit it over and over and over again to MESS with the IRS. This is an unreasonable search and seizure.
Who decides what's unreasonable? You?... think again...
They would just take everyone's money ....
what if everyone withdraw every cent they had in the banks and never used banks again...
Its none of the governments business what a legal citizen has in the bank!
Isn't it the duty of the US marshalls office to go after "ill gotten gains?"
What about talk of punitive damages!? No pain no refrain.
What ever happened to innocent till proven guilty?
The bs narrative they use is that the money 💵 can’t be jailed, so it doesn’t have a presumption of innocence; the owner must instead “prove” the money 💵 is perfectly legal. Which is expensive, difficult, or even sometimes impossible. Greatest country in the world my ass. Makes decent people want to scream 😱. Civil forfeiture is theft. If a person doesn’t get convicted, then they should be entitled to everything back plus interest and damages. Unreal.
So you better not deposit your money? Better only deposit what you need to immidiatly pay digital.
6:44 " caught her on their radar" pay close attention to the words that people use... out of the abundance of the heart...
damned if you do, damned if you don't. Every business needs a lawyer.
what if you're depositing just under $10,000 worth of CHECKS, bc that's about you take in every month from clients?
This is likethe King making a law to make a crime out of something ordinary just to go after someone just because you don't like them, or because they want your money or property!!
Easy way to stop civil forfeiture: make any seized money be held in an interest-bearing account for a period not exceeding 1 year, then after a criminal conviction, transfer that money to a charity. Any charity wishing to accept any money must have full transparency on all their accounting, with ANY donations or payments made to any agency with the ability to perform asset seizures disqualifying that charity from receiving any seizure money. If charges are not brought against the person whose assets are seized within a reasonable amount of time (3 months? 6 months?), assets must be returned to the original owner, with any interest accrued.
It's crystal clear to anyone paying attention that civil forfeiture is being used as a source of income. Take away that potential income, and you take away the motive for agencies to seize it in the first place.
Better yet, enforce laws against felony theft of this nature. There's no such thing as "it's only theft from a certain point of view".
Or... just get rid of civil forfeiture
No, repeal civic asset forfeiture. It's illegal.
@bryank7133 Stop making sense, the government doesn't like it when the American people make more sense than them.
So...just wondering...does depositing $10K + 0.01 repeatedly generate lots of unnecessary paperwork?
OK, one question is in my mind right off the bat. Who passed these laws? When did they pass these laws? What makes these unconstitutional laws permissible and defensible in a court of law? No Supreme Court challenges?
If congress passed these laws, what was their intention? I guess I will have to study the history of these laws and find a way to overturn these laws.
They got a grand mother. Her crime. She with drew 8000 three times to give a gift to three grand kids. She wanted it seperated by the bank. nope, your a criminal. You should have pulled 24k all at once. It's very sickening.
These laws were passed in the 1980s while Reagan was in office. They remain on the books because lower courts uphold them. The time and expense involved in repeated appeals gradually wears down plaintiffs through attrition so eventually they just cut their losses, drop the suits and give up. We are always told you can't fight the system. Well, you can fight but you will always lose
The only time i ever put money in the bank was in safe deposit box but i have learned to avoid those also
Ahh America! Land of the free money. For the Government.
Innocent until proven guilty?
It's a nice platitude, isn't it? People who are incarcerated before their arraignment are essentially innocent people being held against their will, in the land of the free.
So the “IRS” is in the racketeering business.
This is extremely disturbing.
irs is a foreign corporation - makes sense
Why is complying with constitution important? Doesn’t the govt have our best interests in mind?
So, what should a cash business do? would they have to 'structure' their deposits to exceed $10,000 to void this nonsense
no that would only put you at risk of having your money taken at the local level or being robbed at gunpoint or even by a real criminal.
My bank just accused me of doing this today when I was withdrawing 15,000 of my own money that I earned at my own job because I wanted to give a friend a loan and I didn’t do it all at once
Something about adults with braces gives me the creeps
If you want to drive 70 but go 55 to avoid the hassle of a ticket, that's normal. If you have $12,000 but only deposit $9,900 to avoid the hassle of a form, that's a crime. So remember, the next time you want to drive 70, it might be a federal crime not to.
" If you have $12,000 but only deposit $9,900 to avoid the hassle of a form, that's a crime." That is not a crime. If you deposit just under $10,000 CONSISTENTLY, and cannot show how/why you do that, then it may be a possible crime. For example, if you have a small business and make a monthly deposit of between $8,000 to $9,000 (as supported by your business accounting system), NOBODY has the right to misjudge you as a criminal and size you money. NOBODY HAS THAT RIGHT.
@@ArroEL922 it does not matter weather it is a crime or not they can still do civil forfeiture and steal your money lol
@@w3w3w3 Yeh, the overseers of the law just looking for any excuse to break it anyway!
Why do you think they want 80thousand more IRS audit officers ?
Get the book, Crscink the CodeZ, by Peter Hendrickson. He never lost a case against the I.R.S. By the way, the I.R.S. is private company under contract to work for THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, which is not the same legal entity as "The Government of the United States of Americs. GET THAT BOOK.
What if I am depositing frequent cash earnings, such as $300-500 weekly. Will this be considered structuring after a few months when the overall amount hits 10k? If so, should I just wait until I have 10k and deposit it all at once? I would hate to keep cash that long at home
THEFT by any agent under color of law to take rights/property without a proper warrant covered under Title 18 of the US Codes. THERE is & must be a remedy in order for a code to be called law. It is finding out what the remedy is and how to apply it.
I guess the obvious solution is to bury your money in the backyard and never use a bank.
Check out Aaron Russo's movie"America freedom to fascism" a true story
They wonder why people use offshore accounts
To me doesn't the Constitution say that the government prints the money and then spends it into the economy?
And that money being gold and silver.
What politicians wrote that Civil Forfeiture laws?
They were only going to take money from drug dealers, because drug dealers had so much cash they could afford lawyers that would get them off. It sounds wrong to deprive the accused of the ability to defend himself, but at least the government is admitting you're only entitled to as much justice as you can afford.
It’s disgusting.
That’s why it’s not advisable keeping your money in the bank !!
You tube "The Global Lie " to understand the why. This runs deeeeper than you realize
The whole thing doesn't make sense how are you supposed to deposit the money?
Is this what the Nazi's did to the Jew's of Europe? and our IRS has the balls to do it to the Hirsh family. I am sickend and it is outrageous.
Even the mafia don't take ALL your money. " Where do you want to be in five years GODFATHER ? " In the white house "
Smells like structured fascism
This is why you bury your money in the back yard and keep your mouth shut
I like take you money with no dues process but to get your money back you got to hire a lawyer.
No justice injustice I've set it all before Justice only serves her self and nobody wins not even you
Mr. Hope and Change in action.
One word, not two: inaction. Trump didn't help Americans either, and neither will Biden...
That guy on the left looks like Annoying Orange.
Law is just a pretext to kill steal and destroy Ergo gain advantage over others who don't know the intricacies of laws like you do or cannot comprehend or understand your private interpretation of the law
So people with paychecks less then 10k coming in every other weak are also structuring?!
All the while mass money printing, missing money to the tune of BILLION'S and they go after the little guy, sleep well.
Time to go back to the cookie jar.
civil forfeiture in it's current structure might undermine the u.s. economy if they overuse this law.
Careful friend, I think you're seeing behind the curtain! They (the power hungry, don't want others to succeed) aren't to happy with you.
100% agree with you!
This whole thing is bs!
I'm proud to be an American, where at least I know I'm free.
Ooops, I was stupid & wrong. I never knew all the laws.
I still don't.
Put ten thousand in investments and irs can kiss that ass on 6 percent capital gains tax after held for a year ... 😂
Dont put your money in the banks.in America.
Time to put my money definitely not into banks
Money. Working hard for the Money. Got to get me some Money. How much Money do you have? Just enough to pay my taxes.😀
Equitable sharing. Now who could be against equitable sharing? Your mother wasn't against equitable sharing when she raised you and your siblings in fact she encouraged equitable sharing. Such a wonderful thing this equitable sharing.
Who pocket, reward for reporting lot cash
LET ME ASK "YOU PEOPLE" A QUESTION; WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE "LAWS" BEING ON THE BOOKS IN THE FIRST PLACE❗❗❓❓ CERTAINLY NOT YOU😒😒❓❓
God these guys look so weird
Thank Obama and democrats.
I understand the logic of the law because I have seen small businesses evade great sums of money by not accepting credit cards and keeping paper books instead of electronic accounting. However, what the IRS should do is to lobby for laws to obligate the small business to have electronic accounting and credit cards within a reasonable time period. Then prosecute but not the other way around. There are always meritable cases where the IRS has failed to properly apply the law, but the majority of cases are fraudulent activities. No offense but I don't patronize cash-only businesses. There are a lot of people that only pay on cash for the same reasons so they don't need my business anyway.
I don't take credit cards. I do take mostly checks and some people pay cash. I don't like paying 30$ on a thousand $sale, when there is no benefit to my business. I get more then i can do. I don't think you own a business.
We're the only car and truck repair shop in an area of 1000's of square miles. We don't take credit or debit cards. They rip us off. If your car or truck breaks down you bring it to us; we're the only game in town. If you won't pay cash or check tough patootie, then you're a walking sob
Thieves with badges!