The chat acting like they don't understand what X's teacher meant by being an adult doesn't start at a certain age. You can be 18, 20, 40 but even some people at THOSE ages act like manchildren and aren't mature. Legally, they're an adult, but mentally they are not.
@Lycanthrope That's because higher age tends to correspond with being less violent and impulsive. You also usually have more to lose as you get older. Also, I hear the 25 thing tossed around a lot but people are completely misrepresenting the study that it's taken from. The brain doesn't stop developing and will continue to adapt. Not only that but the brain's ability to adapt will slow once you get up there in age so it's more complicated than "25 is an adult so that's what we should base our gun, voting, and drinking laws on".
Yeah but even the "mature" young people are too young and stupid. The age old argument of You dont gotta be old to be smart is one of the downfalls of this world.
Dude says "The founding fathers weren't referencing black people in the constitution" and the chat calls him a hasan viewer. Like that's just history, man. Founding fathers owned slaves and fought to preserve slavery, they aren't saints.
@@survival1769 Quote from the wiki page of old georgie himself "Washington and Congress responded with a series of racist measures: naturalized citizenship was denied to black immigrants; blacks were barred from serving in state militias; the Southwest Territory that would soon become the state of Tennessee was permitted to maintain slavery; and two more slave states were admitted (Kentucky in 1792, and Tennessee in 1796). On February 12, 1793, Washington signed into law the Fugitive Slave Act, which overrode state laws and courts, allowing agents to cross state lines to capture and return escaped slaves.[277] Many free blacks in the north decried the law believing it would allow bounty hunting and the kidnappings of blacks.[278] The Fugitive Slave Act gave effect to the Constitution's Fugitive Slave Clause, and the Act was passed overwhelmingly in Congress" Read some real history. Go take a community college history class and learn what America was actually like. Our schools still say the civil war was a states rights issue for fucks sake. THE STATE'S RIGHT TO ALLOW SLAVERY. But I know you probably aren't even reading this. So call me a commie or whatever and stick your head back in the ground you fucking cretin lmao.
xQc's take was weird toward the end. He's right that people shouldn't blindly trust breaking news because details can change, but it was confirmed that the police waited too long to enter the school, they even admitted it. And he's saying wait until all the investigations are done, but the police aren't even cooperating. He must not be familiar with the event because it sounded like he was trying to give the police the benefit of the doubt, but everyone has already recognized that the police didn't do their job properly, even other police have come out and criticized them.
yeah, that was his whole point, he was not educated on the subject and was suspicious when someone in chat said the police waited too long (since he didn't know it was true)
Even conservatives like Crowder and others called out the police on this. They are supposed to do their job and how they acted is totally unacceptable 💯
He is making a general statement on not taking things at face value before there has been thorough research conducted. In this situation, it didn't fit too well since a lot of things had been confirmed, but in a general sense his take makes sense to me. It's honestly just critical thinking explained.
its a good take for someone casually viewing the situation, staying reserved about taking one side or another is a good idea if you aren't fully sure what's true about a situation
@@GigaChadsAreReal Not defending the Uvalde police, but I just find it funny how hypocritical people can be. First everyone wants to abolish the police, and then when the police enter the school late (which is like abolished police), they hate on them like "they didn't do their job", like, you're the ones that want to abolish them. Not making excuses for Uvalde police btw, F those guys.
that's twitch chat. not one individual has a brain. they are a collective hive mind sharing half a brain cell and they spam dogshit emotes anytime they see something on their screens.
All of the Ice Poseidon refugees are still hanging around in xQc's chat spamming TriHard, WideHard, & Nam. xQc himself, has come a long way but for some reason he's found himself with a community of question mark spamming racists - I have no idea why his mods allow it. Him and forsen's chat are the fucking 4chan of twitch and proud of it.
really? xqc's chat is awful in general. whole thing is just one meme train. and maybe 2 percent of people actually talk seriously with original comments lol.
@@okaysurefinewhatever your right they should’ve done something for the kids that died. But at the end of the day you have to listen to orders, because you don’t know the future and a commanders orders may save the day in one instance (obviously it didn’t this time...). But many smart commanders (which is not the case this time) have saved countless lives with their orders even if the people did not agree with them. You can’t judge people’s on the spot actions when you have the privilege of having hindsight.
No one addressing the elephant in the room that the police were ordered to stand down and holding a line and arresting parents attempting to rescue their children.
That's not the elephant in the room lol, they're just being used as a punching bag by both sides because neither side can own up to their mistakes. Democrats have the president, who PROMISED to add new gun laws, that never happened... TX has a majority republican congress and Republican governor, who has done nothing about gun violence either. So the people to blame are not the police because both sides could've prevented it, but didn't.
@@DragonReaver exactly, thats why there are riots and protests and street arguments on a daily bases about so many different things, people dont care what you say, it's the action and intention, if you cant handle a few words you're jst a btch
The Asian guy was Viet by the accent. And my Viet family is pretty much like that in regards to mental issues - meaning they don’t really exist. Pull yourself up by the bootstraps kinda deal. It’s how they were raised so I can’t really fault them for not understanding that. It’s also a consequence of the hardships they’d gone through with the Vietnam War, and being able to survive that to get here, often through sheer will. So the problems with mental health we face seem so insignificant in their eyes. Just another case of different upbringing and life experiences shaping what we believe in.
Asians in general, as someone who comes from an Indian family my dad always told me that mental illness doesn't exist and I'm being dramatic, kinda toughened me up but also shows what an issue it is talking about this in Asian families
Channel 5 content is biased. They only show radicals or people with very extreme views. They don't show the moderates and with the editing and production, it's clear the message they're trying to send.
2:08 : what he means it that when the founding fathers created the constitution, many things were different. AR didn’t exist, so the settings was different. He is also meant to say, it didn’t even include black people at first, to show that it was written a very long time under very different circumstances. At least that’s how I got it, but I’m French so what do I know lmao
youre right! When our constitution in the US was written, it never intended to include blacks as equal humans. Maybe some of them had that hope, but it was not reality of the time. It took until the 14th (honestly, 15th) amendment for the first sign of black representation, if you can even call it that. The protections made by the constitution did not protect many people until changes were made later, so you, xQc and the young guy in the video were all spot on. Chat is too smoothbrained or young to understand that speaking about race =/= racism. they were ready to crucify felix when he got the point of the message for no reason, im glad he choose to just shut up.
@@sal166 Need to be competitive with the government ? You mean a nuclear superpower with tanks, fighter jets and nukes ? Where’s your nuclear warhead my guy ? In your back pocket ? Why can’t you own one ?
17:00 literal Batchest lmao. Channel 5 only seems unbiased if you can't point out whose wrong or whose right in the video and if you can't do that, you might be on the wrong side.
@Narja "you tend to have the wrong view". He's saying every view is right in their own way, so every view is the wrong view? Also, I like the comparison of the kid believing in morality to nazis.
At least 18 year olds aren't allowed to buy guns while being drunk. :D But yeah, that country needs some sort of gun permits, similar to driver's licence, at the very least.
its crazy how brainwashed everyone is, probably me included, but theyre just reiterating what they hear from their parents/on tv/twitter etc. make your own damn opinions, its okay to not know or not have an opinion.
yeah this was really...really fucking sad. the couple at the end is a perfect example of where this country is. ppl with common sense get told to shush while the ones telling us to be quite fight for free speech......
Can you not form your own opinions based off multiple different perspectives on social media, family, or television? Just because you see a lot of the same opinions online doesn't mean those people are "brainwashed", those might be their genuine opinion on a specific subject matter.
I don't understand why the chat mods don't do anything about the constant racist spam that appears whenever there's an Asian person with a heavy accent. Chat spamming Dank and pepega just because a man can't speak perfect english is such trash behavior (Edit: I don't think I've ever seen the Nam emote used for anything other than mocking Asians. I don't understand why it's not banned. X will ban emotes related to game complaining but apparently making fun of Asians is ok...)
Even forsen's bajs were unironically better than this and that's saying something. Is it just me or is has the chat become more and more braindead over the years
7:10 The thing is...he isnt entirely wrong. It IS true that singleparenthood households have drastically increased...in the US the single parenthood rate is 40% overall. For black families its 70%. Both those figures are fucking insane...and in a country that already lacks proper education, I cant even begin to imagine how many problems are arising and have arisen due to children growing up with only 1 parent. The thing is...I still dont think everyone having guns is good. Why? Its not because of people wanting protection...its an OK argument to say that removing all the guns is not feasable, so everyone having guns makes people use them less. Most school shootings happen in no-gun zones...BUT Theres a HUGE BUT. Suicide...60% of firearm related deaths are suicides...thats INSANE There are 800 000 suicides in the world annually...compared to 400 000 murders Suicide is a global crisis...and when 85% of gunrelated suicide attemps succeed...im not very fond of letting the most depressed generation to date have ample means of committing irreversible acts...
But isn't relating children from single parent households to school shooters a big stretch? You can still be raised into a good life with one parent. Not saying that was your stance on it or anything, I just think that the guy was so caught up on what he sees as good family values, that he was missing the big picture.
He's right about the single parenthood rate, but he didn''t mention why. Single parenthood and crime was sparse for the black community before things like redlining and the war on drugs. Saying school shootings happen because of people being brought up by one parent is delusional. Correlation != causation
@@anon9359 Agreed. I probably shoulve elaborared on why he was only partially correct. Its because he didnt bring up any supporting evidence for, like u said, single parenthood kids being more prone to school shootings or even just violence in general. I havent seen any such evidence myself. My bad for a lack of elaboration.
Or you need to stop taking CNN and Hasans word as truth if you really think this is how it works. They have debunked this countless times. Plus, we will never listen to the "common sense" of people that claim woman can have a penis.
It's easy to say this in hindsight. But imagine the uproar of people getting detained simply because they are suspicious. The left would go crazy especially for black people who could be considered suspicious. If you want to restrict freedom for the sake of safety, go for it.
Chatter: "Gun free countries still have gun violence" I'm not trying to make this a competition, all gun violence is bad, obviously. But saying that like it's an excuse or it's the same is absolutely braindead. JUST because it happens doesn't mean that having multiple times the deaths by firearms than all of Europe combined every year is the same thing just because "bUt lOOk gUYS it still happens in those countries" no shit it does, It's impossible to make it completely dissapear but that's not the point at all, holy shlt.
it's been 40 years since we had a mass shooting here all because we banned guns. Truth is Americans just want guns because they think its cool or fun and they apparently are happy to risk kids lives just so they can keep them.
Yeah but then they just stab eachother to death with knives. The issue really isn't the method of killing, nobody in their right mind murders another person, you literally have to be mentally ill in some way or another.
as someone who lost my dad to suicide when i was 6 and raised by a single mother with 4 kids including me, small house barely enough money to pay rent and such + a hardcore gamer mainly fps games.. i have never done any type of drugs or wanted to harm another human being
The "videogames = violence" take is just a ruse politicians use to ignore the actual issue at hand. It's much easier to redirect blame to another thing than to actually fix it.
@@okaysurefinewhatever don't think it causes violence but it definitely plants the ideas in your head. If there's a kid who has played fps games, when he is angry he might have violent thoughts involving guns. If you have a kid who gets angry and never played fps games, they wouldn't be thinking about shooting up a place.
@@dougdimidome2223 the kid should already have some huge mental problems since he was born to have this shit,I've been playing fps games n shi since I was 6 and I always knew that this shit is absolutely horrible and I never wanted to do something like this (and y are we blamin games here,literally everything can do that do some mentally unstable person,like books,news,movies,shows,youtube videos,everything)
9:00 if they make it a hassle and where you have to interview people to get a gun then that can be used to take away the citizens RIGHT to bear arms. If you haven't done anything wrong and have no history of mental issues then why would anyone else have a right to deny you? Some people seem to think you can write words on a piece of paper and eliminate evil. Unfortunately the world doesn't work like that. Evil will always exists. But the good will always outway the bad.
Why is owning a weapon that can shoot hundreds of rounds and only purpose being is to gun large quantities of people down in seconds so important to you? Why can't you just be happy with a pistol? Why do think people should own weapons that only have the purpose of gunning down groups of people?
Useless platitudes like "the good always outwaying the bad" mean nothing, and this mindset is exactly why these tragedies keep happening week after week.
6:39 He's just wrong lol. The guy was born in the late 50's meaning that he went to high school in the late 60's/early 70's. According to k12Academics, there were around 10 school shootings from 1966-1974. Compared to today's insane numbers, it may not seem like that much, but keep in mind that this was during the time of no media. A majority of today's school shooting are inspired by Columbine, which happened 20-25 years after he went to high school.
2:17 I forget how young X's chat is. He's saying he didn't think the founding fathers or a lot of people back then expected there to be free black people or a bunch of people of color living in the US as citizens
Nothing about age. He's literally wrong, as are you. The founding fathers were a product of their time but were against slavery, and supported movements prohibiting the proliferation of the slave trade. They were also liberal on immigration.
@@nugget7865 You americans are so brainwashed it's insane. Imagine whitewashing history by lying about the founding fathers to blame it on the times, while in the same breath say they were against slavery. Thomas jefferson who wrote " All men are created equal" owned black slaves. The hell are you on about?! Even with abolishment of chattle slavery he still owned them and went to great lengths to keep it that way. Also none of the founding fathers were against slavery in general and I would advice you as the low IQ individual you are to read about the 13th amendment that is still in place and make it legal to keep slaves in prison systems. Imagine knowing so little about your own history and being corrected by a none american 🤪
@@9529jake "Thomas jefferson who wrote " All men are created equal" owned black slaves.", which I addressed by the fact that they were a product of their time. "...while in the same breath say they were against slavery.", yes, they did. Your inability to deal with nuance is a self - report. If you can't grasp simple concepts, then it's your problem. "Also none of the founding fathers were against slavery in general...", incorrect. Source? "Trust me bro". "...13th amendment that is still in place and make it legal to keep slaves in prison systems.", yes, please quote, what does the 13th amendment say? "Imagine knowing so little about your own history and being corrected by a none american", I'm not American, and neither are you correct. Wrong on both counts, embarrassing.
I like how the guy at 18:30 is talking about living in a free society and having rights and privileges yet he's against women having a choice over their body.
I'm not anti-abortion, but their entire stance is that the fetus also has rights. Normally one's rights cannot interfere with the rights of another. So that isn't hypocritical at all.
@@natedadank4870 Yes it is LMAO. Why is the fetus rights interfering with the womens rights not a direct display of it being hypocritical? You can't force people to donate organs even when they die, yet you can force women to 'donate' their organ to raise a baby for an entire year. (And they basically can't do much for a couple months as well) Its extremely hypocritical.
AR does not stand for assault rifle. Or automatic rifle. It stands for armalite rifle. These children mean to say ar style rifles. Which include fn scar, galil, bushmaster ACR, baretta arx, cz bren etc. None of which are sold in full auto. As a civilian you can only purchase semi auto. Which is why bumpstocks are sold.
@@Myday_145 AR is a gun manufacturer AR= armalite rifle. Automatic rifles aren't legal. Semi-automatic rifles are all you can buy. AR-15 are the civilian manufactured version of the military m-16 without the automatic 3round burst. Do some research child.
Finland and Norway (where i live) have some of the highest gun per citizen in the world still basically no mass shootings, we have more reasonable guns laws but we can still have ar-15s with 50 round mags and in finland you can own machine guns i believe. Seems like a US problem not a gun entirely a gun problem. Edit: why are people trying to lecture me with gun laws they know nothing about, I have literally legally shot these weapons that people claim to be banned in Norway a couple weeks ago. Also some people misunderstood my comment, I said guns are not ENTIRELY the problem they are surely a big part of the problem, but the way you aquire guns and mental health in the US is a bigger factor than the fact that it is possible to aquire them. Another thing I failed to mention is that its illegal to use guns for self defence in Norway and guns are therefor not really seen as a weapon used against people (very few times police even draw their guns and they usually have them in the car).
It's because Americans have been manipulated by the leftist media that they can do and say whatever they want. And it's leaked into social media. And who uses social media? Teenagers. Who commits these shootings? Teenagers.
It wasn’t “poorly worded” it’s literally true. Slavery was an enshrined right in the Constitution, how can you see that and not think that they didn’t want black people to be free?
Because back in the day slavery was a common thing. Even black people owned/sold slaves. Now times have changed and we've become more modern and do not have to rely on slavery to progress as a society. How do you keep living in the past?
@@Th3Snipe not even true. Britain abolished slavery prior the American Revolution and so had many other countries. The Persian Empire abolished slavery a thousand years ago so that’s a really bad excuse to make. You’re just a revisionist that wants to rewrite history to fit their own racist narrative.
Actual fishbrain modern urbanite can't understand how a document created specifically to be malleable to a national situation requires context and should not be taken literally as it was written in the 1700's
Yes and my entire point was that the people who wrote it did so with this in mind. If they didn't want black people to eventually be freed they wouldn't justify it in a document literally made to be changed over time?
The earliest known United States shooting to happen on school property was the Pontiac's Rebellion school massacre on July 26, 1764, where four Lenape American Indian entered the schoolhouse near present-day Greencastle, Pennsylvania, shot and killed schoolmaster Enoch Brown, and killed nine or ten children (reports vary). Only two children survived. Anyone who comes with the argument it didn't happen before is on high copium
it's the pigs problem. the police should be punished if they don't do their job...the people should not be armed and do their job for them. ban ar 15 and riffles also fix the cops ( more exercises and less doughnuts)
The main problem with mental health checks for gun ownership is the fact someone can like smoking weed, go to their doctor and get a medical card for depression/anxiety and smoke weed for a year and then decide to quit and move on with their life. Then they decide to buy a gun and can not legally get one. If we do mental health checks for guns we have to account for that as it’s a TON of people. (Not the whole smoking weed part, that’s just a back story example but tons of people have diagnosed depression and anxiety and are totally fine after a small amount of time goes by and the insane stressors of their life have changed.)
Yes...I don't see the problem either. I live in germany where you can get a gun license if you want it for sport shooting and stuff, but you need to be in an actual shooting club and you regularly need to participate in tournaments to keep your license. You also have to be part of the club for over a year to even be able to get the license and only with approval from the club. Then you also have to pass a psychological evaluation and a firearms safety and proficiency test to make sure you know what you are doing. You can also get a gun for hunting purposes. On the very rare occasion that we do have school shootings, there are usually very very few casualties simply because weapons cost much more on the black market and people with these intentions can't really afford any more than a pistol, same goes for ammo. You can't buy ammo in gun stores without showing your license. A lot of german laws are stupid (like stupidly strict knife laws making a regular pocket knife illegal in a lot of cases) but the gun laws I am thankful for. Never had to be scared going to school because of fear of being shot.
The real problem is that there are people out there who shouldn't be parents that are having kids. Imagine how shitty of a parent you have to be to raise a kid who is able to justify in their mind buying weapons to kill a bunch of innocent people. And if the child happens to be an outlier and have an antisocial personality disorder, a parent to be so oblivious to their own child harboring plans to kill others.
That was a massive controversy. The reason the police at Columbine waited so long is because they waited for SWAT to arrive. The reason police have ARs and tactical vests in patrol cars now is because of Columbine, so that cops can grab a rifle and rush in to kill an active shooter.
@@dylanabela4058 as tragic as it is that makes more sense to me, like if you’re not equipped with bulletproof vests for the situation at hand then yeah i guess waiting for equipment to arrive makes sense. but this time? the cops really showed their true colors here.
is it just me or i understand what x says most of the time, like it’s almost a trend anytime x says something chat is clueless, like it’s not that hard to understand
True. This stuff was very rare back then. One of my theories is that the rise internet has a big role in forming these killers. The fact that they can hide from reality and be on the internet looking at conspiracies and dangerous content all day makes me think.
The thing is most of these are premeditated, these people will/would stop at nothing to get a hold of a firearm. And its not as simple as banning or setting a specific age. Theres simply so many bad people out there and changing the rules wont help if they wont abide by those rules.
People acting like banning guns would actually do something to the criminals. Braindead EU chatters when a robber comes in with a gun and they don’t have a way to defend themselves lmfao
The same could be said about abortion and yet the same people who say "bans don't work" have so much time, energy, and money to have abortions banned 🤷🤷🤷 All freedoms and no "government overeach" unless of course it's something we don't agree with... Like abortion 🤷🇺🇲💪
Yes, and they compare gun laws to my home country of AU. When AU is completely different to the USA. The USA has borders with two countries, Mexico which has a high density of guns and Canada which has an average density. It is easier to smuggle guns into the USA than it is to AU. Also the government can't afford to pay out every single gun owner in America in a buy back scheme, nor would anyone aside from democratic bootlickers actually give them away.
9:29 background checks have been legally mandated for years. Every single anti gun individual there, as well as every single anti second amendment and gun chatter, is blatantly uninformed/ignorant, wether willfully or not. It’s unfathomably saddening and horrifying at the same time, that there is such a large portion of the population who genuinely do not believe in the validity and practicality of the preservation of human rights for all. You have a human right to defend yourself by any means necessary and those saying otherwise are brainless arms of an unseen, unconscious tyrant called misinformation
Here's some information. You can easily defend yourself with a sidearm. For a kid that just turned 18 to try and buy an automatic weapon should take a lot more than a background check. Honestly he's buying those weapons in generals is ridiculous, but they should at least be kept out of the hands of depressed children
Dude, a 13 year old shouldn’t be able to buy a fkn AR, I don’t remember if it was CNN or Fox News, but they sent a 13 year old with a hidden camera to buy an AR and it only took him 10 minutes to get it, they didn’t ask for any paper work
@@avik9661 it was CNN, but don't tell him that. He'll just say it's propaganda, and even though it might be, it still hints at the bigger picture that kids can get guns easier and younger than they can gamble or drink alcohol
@@avik9661 that’s been debunked like literally hundreds of times lol. Steven crowder also did an undercover operation of the same sorts and went to literally countless gun stores, markets, gun shows etc. and literally everyone laughed in his face for even asking to purchase a gun without a background check. Use your brain. No business is going to risk going to federal prison and losing their livelihood and ruining their legacy and family’s form of sustenance to sell a single firearm to someone for $1000.
@@bosaki8244 idk if it was propaganda or not, but it was most certainly not an accurate picture of reality. Look at literally any other undercover investigation of the same sorts and they all show that no one in their right mind is going to risk going to prison and losing their business to sell a single $1000 gun. Side note, the biggest owner of firearms in the country (the ATF, yes the government) has been caught funneling guns illegally to cartels. But let’s all hand our guns over to them right? Because the government is…. inherently…. more…. trustworthy? tha- …. that’s the take? ??
Fr, there's no reason to have an AR-15. It's only purpose is to kill alot very very fast. If kids gotta go through gun drills and they gotta constantly have "those talks" with their parents, then these grown adults can go through a through background check and interview
@@outsider2.08 I mean idk about that I agree that someone in high school shouldn’t be allowed to buy one but I use them for hunting and range purposes all the time it’s just a hobby and yes if someone decided to want to try and harm me or my family I’m well equipped and will defend my self but I’m not gonna go on some rampage killing spree so why shouldn’t I be allowed to own one
And about background checks. No background check will stop a kid who has no record of violence from raising a flag. It is the people who have not done a crime or shown aggression before that slip through the cracks the most easiest. Maybe the red flag laws that are being proposed that will allow those that are normally unable to communicate to authorities of potential danger from being able to purchase weapons is a possibility, but that is starting to police people's thoughts instead of actions which seems like it could be a very slippery slope. You can think of killing someone, but until you actually do it, it is only a thought.
Oh hey, this guy has fantasies about murdering people, but that shouldn't mean he can't buy a gun: "policing people's thoughts is a slippery slope" It's called a psych evaluation my guy.
It doesn't matter if it's only a thought. We can't wait until somebody actually kills someone, or even themselves, to go "we should start watching their behavior". There are people that are a danger to those around them and to themselves and the only thing stopping them from doing the unspeakable are the minimal barriers that are in place, like their age. No larger barrier will stop these things from happening completely, but the point is to save as many lives as possible Let me know if I'm misinterpreting your words
What about a psychological background check? A legal one might not find anything, but having to sit down with a trained and licensed psychologist might have stopped this.
7:10 This guy is right though, in the past, there weren't as many shootings and whatever as today. Also, I am not from the US, but I do live in a country where firearms are legal for citizens, although, there strict rules in here, and you gotta have background checks, tests etc, but people do hold firearms in here, and there almost never have been any shootings or whatever among citizens. Citizens in my country hold firearms to protect themselves against terrorists.
@@troyboi7662 Yes, The majority in the US that hold guns do not go around and kill people, but the laws aren’t as strict as they should be. Also, I believe it’s not just guns, people in the US are very tribalistic, especially since the last 5 years, and iirc, mental illness is wide and spread among people in the US, and I think this also contributes to the whole situation.
@@zkatom3773 I agree about the mental Inness part. That’s the main issue. We gotta fix that first. Even if all guns in the US were miraculously taken, pepl would still find ways to kill pepl in mass. Like bombs for example.
@@troyboi7662 I don’t agree with taking guns away from the citizens, it’s impossible at this point. What I do think is that the laws need to be stricter, and the police need to work harder to stop incidents like this to ever happen, just like how terrorism is being prevented from happening.
I'm pro-gun because all I need to do is look at my parent's homeland and see how banning guns there turned out. Which made powerful and violent criminal organizations that lowered the standard of living for everyone.
Its more complex than that. Lol. I like guns but people like you are terrible at defending. If you rely on the NRA then your not a pro gun. Even the with the same laws like US some countries handle it better than the US.
@@capitalismftw504 Hows is it more complex than that government bans guns therefore the common person can legally defend themselves but criminal organizations buy said firearms and use them against the citizens in crimes such as theft, drugs, and sex trafficking. Also, I never said that I'm for the NRA but how relying on a pro-gun organization is not pro-gun. Lastly, how do some countries handle it better than the US we don't place in the top 10 in mass shootings compared to the EU.
@@imnotaweeb2982 We have #1 in most school shootings from 2009-2018 by over 2 hundred and fucking eighty. Not to mention an estimated 70% of ALL mass shootings in developed countries happen in the US.
This is such a depressing situation, seeing as how nothing will realistically change any time soon. From my perspective the cause of all these mass shootings is the degeneration of American society and the lack of a strong central culture which everyone should be required to assimilate to, and feel a sense of belonging to. The ease of acquiring firearms certainly plays a part, but that is nowhere near the main cause of these shootings. The tools that people have access to will not stop them from inflicting harm on others. The US has been destroying itself for years and at this point I don't see any positive outcomes for the nation any time soon. I'm glad I left
The math doesn't math on how he had 4k to buy a DD Ar15 that retails close to 2k, a 700 dollar Eotech to go ontop, another rifle(benefit of the doubt it's a pawn shop AR around 600-700$), a bunch of ammo, and a bullet proof vest.
Here in Indonesia, we're more afraid of people holding a machette or a knife than people pointing a gun at us. Nobody owns a gun here unless you're a security guard or a police officer.
I've heard the same thing about Middle-Eastern countries but almost opposite. Apparently the locals get used to seeing rifles and machine guns, but when they see knives and pistols, they know its serious.
More background checks, introduce gun permits, less gun availability in general ideally. Give an option to obtain stuff like AR after they've used "regular" guns for some year(s), and got through some more rigorous tests. If people want the option to own any type of gun, that's fine, but they shouldn't be able to obtain it so easily and impulsively. You should know how to handle it, you should have your brain and record checked, you should get a sense of respect towards and responsibility of having a gun.
The founding fathers dont live in 2022 why do we care what they think? Were they thinking about what the ancestors of 1400 might think of their decisions?
@@unclebary1866 mate, i hate to tell you this. But, i think that what he meant. Bringing up founding fathers is literally useless since they are subjected to a different time and etc.
9:55 I think he was being sarcastic, it's just that the accent doesn't help. Just like the argument against games, only america deals with such gun problems even though mental health problems aren't unique to USA
Mass shootings have happened several times before. *People die, people grieve, nothing changes, repeat.* And despite all of that, it's constant arguing. As an Australian, I can just sit back and watch it all unfold.
2a “right to bear arms” this even at the time of writing meant even things like warships fitting with cannons strong enough to wipe costal cities of the map
RPGs are considered Firearms so with proper registration it is possible to own one. Of course there are some restrictions aswell, for example in California an RPG is considered a "destructive device" so that prevents you from having one. Also you can't fire explosive ammunition, just like how you can own 40mm grenade launchers, you can't own explosive ammo with it.
@@manuelmoralez2257 The founding fathers weren't fucking idiots like everyone says. Of course they knew gun power would advance it was advancing before their eyes!
9:00 Really wondering if he realized that it's not about buying a gun taking longer but more about how exactly stricter gun control is enforced. We hear alot of rhetoric on both sides about how people of certain religions or beliefs are more likely to be terrorists and how long before this is just the left-wing patriot act? a bs legislation that promises to solve a problem it never does at the cost of the average american's freedom. It kind of makes you realize how out of touch he is with politics when he assumes that stricter gun control just means that it takes longer, rather than selectively choosing certain types of people with mental illnesses or ideological backgrounds that are no longer allowed to own a gun ever because they posted an edgy tweet 7 years ago.
I own a ar15 and pistol at the age of 19, it never leaves home unless im going to the range and it's always unloaded when at home unless it is specifically on me for protection when I am home alone. There are sane gun owners and there should be no reason why I shouldn't have these items if they're purely recreational and for home self-defense. Also 9:06 is the smartest thing Felix has ever said surrounding guns, im proud of him.
There SHOULD be no reason, but are you really saying there IS no reason? Is what happened not a good reason to put restrictions on what weapons you can acquire? Look at other countries besides the US and why they dont have this problem nearly as much as we do, because there is no weapons like we have to do them.
There already are restrictions, do you know how hard it was for me to legally obtain a pistol before the age of 21? Everything I do related to it even if it's to buy a holster or go to the range is reported to the authorities including for example how many rounds I use at the range, where I take it, and what I buy relating to anything related to it. I am in no way out of the sights of the state police they know me and what I do without a missing detail.
@@TR13400 Also brining up other countries has the be the most idiotic and widespread "argument" there is and you know why. In 1997 most of Englands guns were taken forcefully and heavy laws were put on, same as in 1996-97 for Australia. We do not have this, and really maybe we should too. However, it is not going to be a thing people give up so easily because people like me will fight to keep them in the hands of good people and take them away from others who don't deserve it. Ypu're also forgetting the amount of illegal guns our country can't seem to get rid of, and I wonder why.
A bit different because to be a hacker you have to have extensive knowledge of computers and code - to be a school shooter you have be an American citizen with two arms and a heartbeat. Even if you did require paperwork to use a computer because of the damage someone could cause with it, I think most people would do the paperwork lol
@@CoconutJewce and you cant say certain stuff without going to jail, but free speech is a constitutional right! and some things need to be changed so bad things don't happen 🤡 why do you think Switzerland and Australia don't have mass shootings happen every week? I can just tell you have zero brain power and regurgitate what your hog dad and mom say
Unironically a centrist to the core. Mfer will give one political take, then the next one he says completely contradicts what he said before. The man is afraid to even touch either side because he knows chat will explode either way.
22:22 Whoever in chat says "OMEGALUL PRAYERS" in a situation like this... I don't even know. Its just not the time or place. Religious or not, believe in prayers or not... what the hells wrong with this chatter
imagine you live in a country where mass shootings happen all the time. imagine every time a mass shooting happens, NOTHING changes, absolutely nothing, even the bare minimum. Imagine every time this happens, the people not wanting change yells "thoughts and prayers". for years on end. this is what happened for the chatter, probably. done with the bullshit "lets just pray and ignore it". i agree, its insensitive, but it's also the reality. prayers wont fix shit
Why? Why does shit like this happen man? It’s like I’m in Don’t Look Up, there is an existential threat yet people are so blatantly ignorant, disrespectful, hurtful. This feels so easy to implement, but for some FUCKING REASON people don’t want things to change. Until it happens to their friends, families, sons, daughters, parents, cousins, I’m just tired. I fucking can’t with this country…
Move. Chicago is in my state. You can’t have a gun in the city but that doesn’t stop criminals and it never will. What it will do is prevent you from having any ability to protect yourselves, especially if you defund police. Which I kind of support that last part, since I’m more than capable of defending myself. I’ve had more of an Arsenal than my local police for decades and have never shot anyone with it. Just don’t break in.
It isn't easy to implement actually. A ban on AR's means a ban on all semi-auto rifles. People are not stupid, they know that if SAR's get banned, then its the semi-auto shotguns and the semi-auto pistols next. After that, what will we have to defend ourselves from criminals? Fucking revolvers, lever-actions, and bolt-actions? We'd be fighting with 1800's tech against 2000's tech. Give gun control advocates an inch, and they will take a mile. Because I guarantee you, it will not stop at AR's. It never does.
The only way to prevent things like this from happening is by adding people's mental status to their background information. Then, people with mental issues can be prevented from owning firearms. Also, there needs to be a federal age limit for firearm ownership. Maybe 25+ years old for gun ownership just to be safe.
@@chiliflis8660 First, mental health history is already checked before a firearm purchase. (I hope you meant something else by that because this just seems ignorant) Second, mental health checks are useless against those who have never been institutionalized, which is most school shooters seeing as they are usually children who have been ignored when they have displayed unhealthy behavior. Third, an age limit would be a bandaid fix, because many school shooters obtain weapons illegally, often from their parents when they neglect to put them in a safe location. Rather than pushing for useless restrictions, think about promoting better mental health support and security in schools. We can hide under the covers all we want and pretend that there aren't monsters out there, but there are, and the best way to deal with them isn't throwing out ineffective laws, the best way is to help people before they can become monsters.
i really respect how x always gives his honest take right off the bat when he sees something. he’s not looking for anyone else or chat to agree with him he just speaks what he believes
he literally said at the end that he doesnt have an opinion because he doesnt want to look like a dumb fuck. xqc's opinion is that of hasan and his surface level understanding of politics that is fed to him through social media
he is literally so scared so say anything because twitch will ban the fuck out of him for not leaning left wing in every take he gives even if its common sense. society has gone to pure shit.
Not really tbh he always gives half a take because he's scared of being cancelled or whatever. It's esp annoying when the take he's about to give is really not even controversial
@@cockernugget48 true its annoying as hell best he not talk at all if hes gonna skirt around it to make sure the kids on either "side" get mad at him on discord or twitter
not to be a cringe lord, but an ar 15 is not an assault rifle, a woman goes on to say she has a handgun, but semi-automatic guns should not be allowed, modern handguns are semi automatic. Almost every commercially available gun is semi-automatic. An ar15 is semi automatic, it's not an assault rifle, it stands for arma light, the difference between an ar15 and a handgun is not the mechanism of fire, but the rounds, long barrel etc. I'm not pro gun/anti-gun, I don't even care, it's just all of the information is completely wrong
I don’t have a problem with a normal person saying assault rifle because they don’t know about guns. I do have a problem when they use that term to make the gun sound scary. Assault rifle is a lot more scary sounding than semi automatic rifle
The loss of the atomic family is a good point for a lot of current issues. XQC is also right that tho that things have changed in many other aspects. Social media is a huge component, kids don’t only get bullied at school now it comes home with them on social media. Not having fathers and the current climate that dads are just buffoons doesn’t help.
Meh. Other countries have guns, and other countries follow the trends of western culture of abandoning the nuclear family. But other countries don't have mass shootings en masse.
@@haarisbutt2075 Nuclear is the word I was looking for, thanks for that. Your right with other countries that adopt some western cultures not having this particular issue. I’m sure kids get bullied the same everywhere and probably similar with single parent homes. It’s almost a phenomenon because people are people no matter the country. The media and government propaganda don’t help anything
@@unclebary1866 They say “assault weapons” instead of assault rifle to purposely make it ambiguous. You can use anything as a weapon to assault someone. Maybe they should learn about how guns work before they try to ban them. A gun can’t walk and shoot people itself. Someone has to load it and pull the trigger for it to shoot.
Problem with going beyond background checks is that we might be soft locked through the law out of all gun ownership, imagine that instead of the “quick” checks we have now you need to have manual checks by the fbi they could just say “we’re working on it” after multiple months and then just never do anything.
Difficulty in getting guns is vastly different varying by state, some states take multiple months and extensive paper work while in others you only need a few hours after a background check
Also semi auto weaponry is very important for anybody who has to face up to nature on a regular basis, imagine a hundred feral hogs charging your property and you aren’t able to use semi-auto weapons to defend yourself. That teacher the fat short woman wants you ti use only bolt action weapons, it’s impossible to stop those hogs without sufficient fire power
@@blankrealist8872 well obviously but if you want to own a semi automatic weapon, and you seriously need it, you should be able to and want to go through all the loops and holes you have to go through to get one.
Canada has stricter gun laws, farmers still own firearms and big gubermint doesn't withhold firearms from people who go through the process. If you actually want to know more you can go watch Vice's "armed and reasonable" video which shows a canadian citizen's process of acquiring a fire arm license and training. As for 100 feral hogs charging you at once i think you might be worried about the wrong kind of pigs.
@@blankrealist8872 that tiny number of people could get a special license after proving their need for it then. Acting like it’s an unsolvable problem and we have to accept nutters shooting up schools so 5 farmers can defend themselves against an organised hog invasion
Yeah like it's weird and I definitely don't think kids should be allowed there but I see nothing really wrong with giving out a few magazines/rounds. Not much you can do with that without getting a gun to fire it with
@@HoloTWWOriginal I’m preeeeeetty sure they don’t allow kids to just walk in there, they are probably accompanied by their parents or some sort of adult.
. People are not out there in mass in the streets going on shooting sprees or killing each other with grenade launchers etc. School shootings still take place in countries where the semi automatic weapons are not available and where firearms are not available. And the number of victims is not really that different. What would change is the effectiveness of the shooter. The reason for these shootings are the conditions at home and at the school. Don’t shift the blame.
You're pulling this out of your ass. Quick google shows USA with 288 school shootings followed by Mexico 8 school shootings from 2009 to 2018, that's not even close.
The part with the kid who loved Sweet Child of Mine, that part had me crying man. She had a whole life ahead of her, same as all those other kids.
sweet pokimane KKool
@loserman ??????
XD
The chat acting like they don't understand what X's teacher meant by being an adult doesn't start at a certain age. You can be 18, 20, 40 but even some people at THOSE ages act like manchildren and aren't mature. Legally, they're an adult, but mentally they are not.
pedophile take
True, you can see from all of Andrew's interviews that most people aren't mentally an adult lmao
they were memeing about ''age is just a number'', I think
@Lycanthrope That's because higher age tends to correspond with being less violent and impulsive. You also usually have more to lose as you get older. Also, I hear the 25 thing tossed around a lot but people are completely misrepresenting the study that it's taken from. The brain doesn't stop developing and will continue to adapt. Not only that but the brain's ability to adapt will slow once you get up there in age so it's more complicated than "25 is an adult so that's what we should base our gun, voting, and drinking laws on".
Yeah but even the "mature" young people are too young and stupid. The age old argument of You dont gotta be old to be smart is one of the downfalls of this world.
Dude says "The founding fathers weren't referencing black people in the constitution" and the chat calls him a hasan viewer. Like that's just history, man. Founding fathers owned slaves and fought to preserve slavery, they aren't saints.
The founding fathers didnt fight to keep slaves around wtf hahahaha 🤣🤣
@@survival1769dude im canadian and I know your history better than you
@@survival1769 Quote from the wiki page of old georgie himself "Washington and Congress responded with a series of racist measures: naturalized citizenship was denied to black immigrants; blacks were barred from serving in state militias; the Southwest Territory that would soon become the state of Tennessee was permitted to maintain slavery; and two more slave states were admitted (Kentucky in 1792, and Tennessee in 1796). On February 12, 1793, Washington signed into law the Fugitive Slave Act, which overrode state laws and courts, allowing agents to cross state lines to capture and return escaped slaves.[277] Many free blacks in the north decried the law believing it would allow bounty hunting and the kidnappings of blacks.[278] The Fugitive Slave Act gave effect to the Constitution's Fugitive Slave Clause, and the Act was passed overwhelmingly in Congress" Read some real history. Go take a community college history class and learn what America was actually like. Our schools still say the civil war was a states rights issue for fucks sake. THE STATE'S RIGHT TO ALLOW SLAVERY. But I know you probably aren't even reading this. So call me a commie or whatever and stick your head back in the ground you fucking cretin lmao.
not sure if this is relevant but this isn’t taught in canada though, after all it’s a different country
It's a shame I feel like his chat genuinely became braindead like how did no one get that
I'm sure chat will have 100% sane and reasonable takes on this video Clueless
Surely the chat won’t go full libtard on an issue they know nothing about TrollDespair
Surely
shirley Clueless
Surely they wont spam emojis at an inappropriate time Clueless
honestly they were fine this time
xQc's take was weird toward the end. He's right that people shouldn't blindly trust breaking news because details can change, but it was confirmed that the police waited too long to enter the school, they even admitted it. And he's saying wait until all the investigations are done, but the police aren't even cooperating. He must not be familiar with the event because it sounded like he was trying to give the police the benefit of the doubt, but everyone has already recognized that the police didn't do their job properly, even other police have come out and criticized them.
yeah, that was his whole point, he was not educated on the subject and was suspicious when someone in chat said the police waited too long (since he didn't know it was true)
Even conservatives like Crowder and others called out the police on this. They are supposed to do their job and how they acted is totally unacceptable 💯
He is making a general statement on not taking things at face value before there has been thorough research conducted. In this situation, it didn't fit too well since a lot of things had been confirmed, but in a general sense his take makes sense to me. It's honestly just critical thinking explained.
its a good take for someone casually viewing the situation, staying reserved about taking one side or another is a good idea if you aren't fully sure what's true about a situation
@@GigaChadsAreReal Not defending the Uvalde police, but I just find it funny how hypocritical people can be. First everyone wants to abolish the police, and then when the police enter the school late (which is like abolished police), they hate on them like "they didn't do their job", like, you're the ones that want to abolish them. Not making excuses for Uvalde police btw, F those guys.
Guy is praying for the kids that passed away in Spanish and all chat could do is spam that dumb ass emote
I fking hate it i always hate that emote is so racist
literally
that's twitch chat. not one individual has a brain. they are a collective hive mind sharing half a brain cell and they spam dogshit emotes anytime they see something on their screens.
BibleThump
12 year olds you know
God damn you really see how awful XQCs chat is when he watches a serious video.
It’s just 12 year olds on twitch in general honestly
children died and they're spamming frog emotes
All of the Ice Poseidon refugees are still hanging around in xQc's chat spamming TriHard, WideHard, & Nam. xQc himself, has come a long way but for some reason he's found himself with a community of question mark spamming racists - I have no idea why his mods allow it. Him and forsen's chat are the fucking 4chan of twitch and proud of it.
You think this is a serious video? AHAHAHAHAHAHAha
really? xqc's chat is awful in general. whole thing is just one meme train. and maybe 2 percent of people actually talk seriously with original comments lol.
Uvaldi police chief should be in jail for a long time, he is responsible for deaths and ruining peoples lives.
YES! The Chief!! Stop blaming it on the officers who were following orders (reluctantly) in fear of losing their jobs!
@@Zincmentomint fitting name lul
"Children dying? But but... what about my job tho..."
E: their name used to be "this opinion is wrong"
@@okaysurefinewhatever your right they should’ve done something for the kids that died.
But at the end of the day you have to listen to orders, because you don’t know the future and a commanders orders may save the day in one instance (obviously it didn’t this time...). But many smart commanders (which is not the case this time) have saved countless lives with their orders even if the people did not agree with them.
You can’t judge people’s on the spot actions when you have the privilege of having hindsight.
@@manproductions5803 fair enough. I guess I didn't take that into consideration.
@@Zincmentomint Aw they were in fear of losing their jobs :(((( meanwhile kids were losing their life
No one addressing the elephant in the room that the police were ordered to stand down and holding a line and arresting parents attempting to rescue their children.
Whoever gave those "orders" and the officers that followed them will have their hands forever stained with the blood of children
i mean the shooter was instructed by feds so the democrats have something to campaign against in the midterms
That's not the elephant in the room lol, they're just being used as a punching bag by both sides because neither side can own up to their mistakes. Democrats have the president, who PROMISED to add new gun laws, that never happened... TX has a majority republican congress and Republican governor, who has done nothing about gun violence either. So the people to blame are not the police because both sides could've prevented it, but didn't.
pepega clap wr
???????????????????????????????????????
“If he can say what he wants, I can say what I want”
Jigachad behaviour.
anyone can say what they want, tf r u talking about? jst because people don't like what others say doesnt mean they cant say it
@@TokyoKiddSilver Well you can say whatever you want unless it is defamatory towards a person and causes damages, then there is consequence.
@@DragonReaver exactly, thats why there are riots and protests and street arguments on a daily bases about so many different things, people dont care what you say, it's the action and intention, if you cant handle a few words you're jst a btch
@@TokyoKiddSilver Only Jigachads understand unfortunately. So I wouldn’t expect you to get it.
x’s chat is insufferable. making jokes while he’s making an actual point…
not much to listen to hes saying politcally accepted things prefacing them with "guys hot take!" then saying the most tame accepted obvious message.
@@daltonmm3675 Very true
The Asian guy was Viet by the accent. And my Viet family is pretty much like that in regards to mental issues - meaning they don’t really exist. Pull yourself up by the bootstraps kinda deal. It’s how they were raised so I can’t really fault them for not understanding that. It’s also a consequence of the hardships they’d gone through with the Vietnam War, and being able to survive that to get here, often through sheer will. So the problems with mental health we face seem so insignificant in their eyes. Just another case of different upbringing and life experiences shaping what we believe in.
@Narja Yea, it sounded like he was saying how other countries also have mental health issues but mass shootings dont happen there.
Asians in general, as someone who comes from an Indian family my dad always told me that mental illness doesn't exist and I'm being dramatic, kinda toughened me up but also shows what an issue it is talking about this in Asian families
He was being sarcastic.
That’s a very sad take on a real problem.
timestamp?
Channel 5 content is always a banger
Channel 5 content is biased. They only show radicals or people with very extreme views. They don't show the moderates and with the editing and production, it's clear the message they're trying to send.
@@alkazar625 KKonaW MAH MAN
@@alkazar625 of course all media is biased bruh
@@alkazar625 Probably because that’s more entertaining to watch
@@alkazar625 thats pretty much the content everyone wants to watch lol
2:08 : what he means it that when the founding fathers created the constitution, many things were different. AR didn’t exist, so the settings was different. He is also meant to say, it didn’t even include black people at first, to show that it was written a very long time under very different circumstances.
At least that’s how I got it, but I’m French so what do I know lmao
Also at 5:28 : at least they aren’t supposed to, but who knows Alec Baldwin’s gun wasn’t supposed to be either …
youre right!
When our constitution in the US was written, it never intended to include blacks as equal humans. Maybe some of them had that hope, but it was not reality of the time.
It took until the 14th (honestly, 15th) amendment for the first sign of black representation, if you can even call it that. The protections made by the constitution did not protect many people until changes were made later, so you, xQc and the young guy in the video were all spot on.
Chat is too smoothbrained or young to understand that speaking about race =/= racism. they were ready to crucify felix when he got the point of the message for no reason, im glad he choose to just shut up.
The people need to be competitive with the government, the gov didn't have ARs back then too, kinda moot point.
@@sal166 Wait till you learn that the government has nukes
@@sal166 Need to be competitive with the government ? You mean a nuclear superpower with tanks, fighter jets and nukes ? Where’s your nuclear warhead my guy ? In your back pocket ? Why can’t you own one ?
17:00 literal Batchest lmao. Channel 5 only seems unbiased if you can't point out whose wrong or whose right in the video and if you can't do that, you might be on the wrong side.
there is no right or wrong side in politics, people like you see the world in black and white
@Narja you just proved his point
@@olubunmiolumuyiwa The amount of idiots like that in this section, always looking at things in a way which is in line with their ideology
Even if you can point who's wrong or right, you could still be in the wrong side by thinking you're on the right side.
@Narja "you tend to have the wrong view". He's saying every view is right in their own way, so every view is the wrong view? Also, I like the comparison of the kid believing in morality to nazis.
Imagine being allowed to buy a gun at 18 but 21 to drink...
At least 18 year olds aren't allowed to buy guns while being drunk. :D
But yeah, that country needs some sort of gun permits, similar to driver's licence, at the very least.
It's good to shed light and awareness about these things, but I don't think xqc and chat are the right people for that...
yep his chat is so dumb that they even think x is smart
fr
Agreed
It doesn’t matter what you think though
@@YourOwnDa i think his/her comment matters imo
chat can be really disappointing sometimes
most of the time, to be honest.
its crazy how brainwashed everyone is, probably me included, but theyre just reiterating what they hear from their parents/on tv/twitter etc. make your own damn opinions, its okay to not know or not have an opinion.
yeah this was really...really fucking sad. the couple at the end is a perfect example of where this country is. ppl with common sense get told to shush while the ones telling us to be quite fight for free speech......
Can you not form your own opinions based off multiple different perspectives on social media, family, or television? Just because you see a lot of the same opinions online doesn't mean those people are "brainwashed", those might be their genuine opinion on a specific subject matter.
Liberals in a nutshell
I don't understand why the chat mods don't do anything about the constant racist spam that appears whenever there's an Asian person with a heavy accent. Chat spamming Dank and pepega just because a man can't speak perfect english is such trash behavior
(Edit: I don't think I've ever seen the Nam emote used for anything other than mocking Asians. I don't understand why it's not banned. X will ban emotes related to game complaining but apparently making fun of Asians is ok...)
Spamming emote = racist, well guys gen Z is more even more soy and braindead than ever
Not false
Agreee
racism toward asians is not going away on twitch any time soon
Even forsen's bajs were unironically better than this and that's saying something. Is it just me or is has the chat become more and more braindead over the years
Sometimes chat really lacks the ability to critically think.
theyre 14
Not wrong their first instinct is to spam "?" instead of using their brain.
These guys watch Hasan bro what do you expect do does nothing but question mark his entire life
7:10 The thing is...he isnt entirely wrong.
It IS true that singleparenthood households have drastically increased...in the US the single parenthood rate is 40% overall.
For black families its 70%. Both those figures are fucking insane...and in a country that already lacks proper education, I cant even begin to imagine how many problems are arising and have arisen due to children growing up with only 1 parent.
The thing is...I still dont think everyone having guns is good. Why? Its not because of people wanting protection...its an OK argument to say that removing all the guns is not feasable, so everyone having guns makes people use them less. Most school shootings happen in no-gun zones...BUT
Theres a HUGE BUT. Suicide...60% of firearm related deaths are suicides...thats INSANE
There are 800 000 suicides in the world annually...compared to 400 000 murders
Suicide is a global crisis...and when 85% of gunrelated suicide attemps succeed...im not very fond of letting the most depressed generation to date have ample means of committing irreversible acts...
Shhhh, right bad, right wrong though
But isn't relating children from single parent households to school shooters a big stretch? You can still be raised into a good life with one parent. Not saying that was your stance on it or anything, I just think that the guy was so caught up on what he sees as good family values, that he was missing the big picture.
He's right about the single parenthood rate, but he didn''t mention why. Single parenthood and crime was sparse for the black community before things like redlining and the war on drugs. Saying school shootings happen because of people being brought up by one parent is delusional. Correlation != causation
@@anon9359 Agreed. I probably shoulve elaborared on why he was only partially correct. Its because he didnt bring up any supporting evidence for, like u said, single parenthood kids being more prone to school shootings or even just violence in general.
I havent seen any such evidence myself.
My bad for a lack of elaboration.
@@cockernugget48 true
When an fresh 18y/o suddenly quits his job, buys 2 ARs and a buletproof vest you don't need any mental checkup. You just need common sense
Or you need to stop taking CNN and Hasans word as truth if you really think this is how it works. They have debunked this countless times. Plus, we will never listen to the "common sense" of people that claim woman can have a penis.
It's easy to say this in hindsight. But imagine the uproar of people getting detained simply because they are suspicious. The left would go crazy especially for black people who could be considered suspicious. If you want to restrict freedom for the sake of safety, go for it.
He passed a background check
@@ExoticCreep shooters like that often have no criminal history to show up on a check like that
@@proxivirus looks like you've figured it out
The guy is right, a year later more shootings have occured and forgotten about uvalde.
Chatter: "Gun free countries still have gun violence"
I'm not trying to make this a competition, all gun violence is bad, obviously.
But saying that like it's an excuse or it's the same is absolutely braindead.
JUST because it happens doesn't mean that having multiple times the deaths by firearms than all of Europe combined every year is the same thing just because "bUt lOOk gUYS it still happens in those countries" no shit it does, It's impossible to make it completely dissapear but that's not the point at all, holy shlt.
Don't bother with this. There's a lot of them and they'll keep being them. Saves you brain cells to just let them keep killing themselves.
it's been 40 years since we had a mass shooting here all because we banned guns. Truth is Americans just want guns because they think its cool or fun and they apparently are happy to risk kids lives just so they can keep them.
Yeah but then they just stab eachother to death with knives. The issue really isn't the method of killing, nobody in their right mind murders another person, you literally have to be mentally ill in some way or another.
as someone who lost my dad to suicide when i was 6 and raised by a single mother with 4 kids including me, small house barely enough money to pay rent and such + a hardcore gamer mainly fps games.. i have never done any type of drugs or wanted to harm another human being
The "videogames = violence" take is just a ruse politicians use to ignore the actual issue at hand. It's much easier to redirect blame to another thing than to actually fix it.
@@okaysurefinewhatever don't think it causes violence but it definitely plants the ideas in your head. If there's a kid who has played fps games, when he is angry he might have violent thoughts involving guns. If you have a kid who gets angry and never played fps games, they wouldn't be thinking about shooting up a place.
@@dougdimidome2223 the kid should already have some huge mental problems since he was born to have this shit,I've been playing fps games n shi since I was 6 and I always knew that this shit is absolutely horrible and I never wanted to do something like this (and y are we blamin games here,literally everything can do that do some mentally unstable person,like books,news,movies,shows,youtube videos,everything)
@@dougdimidome2223 exactly pretty logical
@@dougdimidome2223 I completely agree
14:13 one of the best takes xQc will ever have
yea it was good, but then chat just huh ing because they make everything about something else, braindead ass chat
9:00 if they make it a hassle and where you have to interview people to get a gun then that can be used to take away the citizens RIGHT to bear arms. If you haven't done anything wrong and have no history of mental issues then why would anyone else have a right to deny you?
Some people seem to think you can write words on a piece of paper and eliminate evil. Unfortunately the world doesn't work like that. Evil will always exists. But the good will always outway the bad.
"But the good will always outway the bad" are you live on hollywood or something? go outside bro
Why is owning a weapon that can shoot hundreds of rounds and only purpose being is to gun large quantities of people down in seconds so important to you?
Why can't you just be happy with a pistol? Why do think people should own weapons that only have the purpose of gunning down groups of people?
@@farhanizzuddin6658 lol
Useless platitudes like "the good always outwaying the bad" mean nothing, and this mindset is exactly why these tragedies keep happening week after week.
@@justintime3587 ok keep being angry.
6:39 He's just wrong lol. The guy was born in the late 50's meaning that he went to high school in the late 60's/early 70's. According to k12Academics, there were around 10 school shootings from 1966-1974. Compared to today's insane numbers, it may not seem like that much, but keep in mind that this was during the time of no media. A majority of today's school shooting are inspired by Columbine, which happened 20-25 years after he went to high school.
i never expected the edp445 guy to show up at a gun convention
2:17 I forget how young X's chat is. He's saying he didn't think the founding fathers or a lot of people back then expected there to be free black people or a bunch of people of color living in the US as citizens
Nothing about age. He's literally wrong, as are you. The founding fathers were a product of their time but were against slavery, and supported movements prohibiting the proliferation of the slave trade. They were also liberal on immigration.
@@nugget7865 You americans are so brainwashed it's insane. Imagine whitewashing history by lying about the founding fathers to blame it on the times, while in the same breath say they were against slavery. Thomas jefferson who wrote " All men are created equal" owned black slaves. The hell are you on about?! Even with abolishment of chattle slavery he still owned them and went to great lengths to keep it that way. Also none of the founding fathers were against slavery in general and I would advice you as the low IQ individual you are to read about the 13th amendment that is still in place and make it legal to keep slaves in prison systems. Imagine knowing so little about your own history and being corrected by a none american 🤪
@@9529jake "Thomas jefferson who wrote " All men are created equal" owned black slaves.", which I addressed by the fact that they were a product of their time.
"...while in the same breath say they were against slavery.", yes, they did. Your inability to deal with nuance is a self - report. If you can't grasp simple concepts, then it's your problem.
"Also none of the founding fathers were against slavery in general...", incorrect. Source? "Trust me bro".
"...13th amendment that is still in place and make it legal to keep slaves in prison systems.", yes, please quote, what does the 13th amendment say?
"Imagine knowing so little about your own history and being corrected by a none american", I'm not American, and neither are you correct. Wrong on both counts, embarrassing.
I like how the guy at 18:30 is talking about living in a free society and having rights and privileges yet he's against women having a choice over their body.
Gotta protect all lives, not just the convenient ones.
He’s against what he sees as murder
Lol, we should put ur grandpa down for being a worthless member to society that drains money :)
I'm not anti-abortion, but their entire stance is that the fetus also has rights. Normally one's rights cannot interfere with the rights of another. So that isn't hypocritical at all.
@@natedadank4870 Yes it is LMAO. Why is the fetus rights interfering with the womens rights not a direct display of it being hypocritical? You can't force people to donate organs even when they die, yet you can force women to 'donate' their organ to raise a baby for an entire year. (And they basically can't do much for a couple months as well) Its extremely hypocritical.
Old man from Arkansas USA checking in. I carry a pistol literally everywhere I go.
good citizen
Who asked lmao
Don’t pull it out in an active shooter situation or the cops will think you’re the shooter.
ok grandpa thats it with your internet time now go and play catch-a-bullet in the nursery home
@@Bullfrog777 the cops aren't there yet when it goes down tho
xqc's twitch chat and youtube comment section are so different.
Times like these I'm happy I'm mainly a TH-cam frog.
people use ar to hunt all the time mainly at night with thermal scopes lol in texas you go in a heli for hog hunting using an ar alot of the time
AR does not stand for assault rifle. Or automatic rifle. It stands for armalite rifle. These children mean to say ar style rifles. Which include fn scar, galil, bushmaster ACR, baretta arx, cz bren etc. None of which are sold in full auto. As a civilian you can only purchase semi auto. Which is why bumpstocks are sold.
For anyone wondering and was about to say that this dude is wrong
*AR = Automatic Rifle*
ok gun andy nobody cares that you beat off to different specs of firearms
still doesn't change that they should be banned or at least more restricted for citizens
@@Myday_145 AR is a gun manufacturer AR= armalite rifle. Automatic rifles aren't legal. Semi-automatic rifles are all you can buy. AR-15 are the civilian manufactured version of the military m-16 without the automatic 3round burst. Do some research child.
@@Myday_145 that is also wrong that is not what AR stands for.
Finland and Norway (where i live) have some of the highest gun per citizen in the world still basically no mass shootings, we have more reasonable guns laws but we can still have ar-15s with 50 round mags and in finland you can own machine guns i believe. Seems like a US problem not a gun entirely a gun problem.
Edit: why are people trying to lecture me with gun laws they know nothing about, I have literally legally shot these weapons that people claim to be banned in Norway a couple weeks ago. Also some people misunderstood my comment, I said guns are not ENTIRELY the problem they are surely a big part of the problem, but the way you aquire guns and mental health in the US is a bigger factor than the fact that it is possible to aquire them. Another thing I failed to mention is that its illegal to use guns for self defence in Norway and guns are therefor not really seen as a weapon used against people (very few times police even draw their guns and they usually have them in the car).
Because you guys are different from americans. Chiller and know better around gun control
Anders Breivik killed like 80 people
It's because Americans have been manipulated by the leftist media that they can do and say whatever they want. And it's leaked into social media. And who uses social media? Teenagers. Who commits these shootings? Teenagers.
@@OcarinaOfVali and Finland is majority one people, one culture.
@@sal166 Well now that's just racist Batchest
It wasn’t “poorly worded” it’s literally true. Slavery was an enshrined right in the Constitution, how can you see that and not think that they didn’t want black people to be free?
Because back in the day slavery was a common thing. Even black people owned/sold slaves.
Now times have changed and we've become more modern and do not have to rely on slavery to progress as a society.
How do you keep living in the past?
@@Th3Snipe not even true. Britain abolished slavery prior the American Revolution and so had many other countries. The Persian Empire abolished slavery a thousand years ago so that’s a really bad excuse to make. You’re just a revisionist that wants to rewrite history to fit their own racist narrative.
Actual fishbrain modern urbanite can't understand how a document created specifically to be malleable to a national situation requires context and should not be taken literally as it was written in the 1700's
@@htmljesusarchive6341 yea that’s kind of the whole point of a constitution 💀
Yes and my entire point was that the people who wrote it did so with this in mind. If they didn't want black people to eventually be freed they wouldn't justify it in a document literally made to be changed over time?
The earliest known United States shooting to happen on school property was the Pontiac's Rebellion school massacre on July 26, 1764, where four Lenape American Indian entered the schoolhouse near present-day Greencastle, Pennsylvania, shot and killed schoolmaster Enoch Brown, and killed nine or ten children (reports vary). Only two children survived.
Anyone who comes with the argument it didn't happen before is on high copium
don't think there is a single person who would say it didn't happen before. Unless they know nothing about current events, and history.
No one said it never happened. They just said it rarely ever happened.
there no school shootings in swtizerland and owning a gun in swtizerland is mandatory
Take away gun. Ummm LA riot is a prime example and asian got to stand there ground. Police ran yea I dont think the tool is the problem, its people.
it's the pigs problem. the police should be punished if they don't do their job...the people should not be armed and do their job for them. ban ar 15 and riffles also fix the cops ( more exercises and less doughnuts)
God bless the rooftop Koreans.
"This guy is like 13 or 14", lol. It could be Andy Milonakis... who knows?
unironically best content out rn PogU
Xqc Stealing content = best content
The main problem with mental health checks for gun ownership is the fact someone can like smoking weed, go to their doctor and get a medical card for depression/anxiety and smoke weed for a year and then decide to quit and move on with their life. Then they decide to buy a gun and can not legally get one. If we do mental health checks for guns we have to account for that as it’s a TON of people. (Not the whole smoking weed part, that’s just a back story example but tons of people have diagnosed depression and anxiety and are totally fine after a small amount of time goes by and the insane stressors of their life have changed.)
So basically you're saying it's totally fine for a mentally unstable hormonal teen to buy guns.
Got it.
Sure, then I guess a lot of people are not gonna be owning guns then. Whatever
Yes...I don't see the problem either. I live in germany where you can get a gun license if you want it for sport shooting and stuff, but you need to be in an actual shooting club and you regularly need to participate in tournaments to keep your license. You also have to be part of the club for over a year to even be able to get the license and only with approval from the club. Then you also have to pass a psychological evaluation and a firearms safety and proficiency test to make sure you know what you are doing. You can also get a gun for hunting purposes. On the very rare occasion that we do have school shootings, there are usually very very few casualties simply because weapons cost much more on the black market and people with these intentions can't really afford any more than a pistol, same goes for ammo. You can't buy ammo in gun stores without showing your license. A lot of german laws are stupid (like stupidly strict knife laws making a regular pocket knife illegal in a lot of cases) but the gun laws I am thankful for. Never had to be scared going to school because of fear of being shot.
The real problem is that there are people out there who shouldn't be parents that are having kids. Imagine how shitty of a parent you have to be to raise a kid who is able to justify in their mind buying weapons to kill a bunch of innocent people. And if the child happens to be an outlier and have an antisocial personality disorder, a parent to be so oblivious to their own child harboring plans to kill others.
I know some people just don't know what protection is, or they just don't care. Most likely the latter.
The guy who said it's unheard of for police not to rush in must not be familiar with Columbine
Correct me if I’m wrong but, I believe columbine happened before any *real* policies were in place for active shooters.
Dude yes, however police now have policies where they are supposed to rush in. Columbine no such thing existed as school shootings were still rare.
They got rules because If they all did that they could end up shooting a civilian or a another cop
Especially parents try to rush in
That was a massive controversy. The reason the police at Columbine waited so long is because they waited for SWAT to arrive. The reason police have ARs and tactical vests in patrol cars now is because of Columbine, so that cops can grab a rifle and rush in to kill an active shooter.
@@dylanabela4058 as tragic as it is that makes more sense to me, like if you’re not equipped with bulletproof vests for the situation at hand then yeah i guess waiting for equipment to arrive makes sense. but this time? the cops really showed their true colors here.
is it just me or i understand what x says most of the time, like it’s almost a trend anytime x says something chat is clueless, like it’s not that hard to understand
The chat on this one is brain dead
At 7:00 when the guy was talking about kids bringing shotguns to school as normal, you could see maybe there was a more innocent mindset back then
11:25 Chat went from Pepegachat "more guns KKonaW" to "true" real quick
my goodness, mr X back at it again with the extraterrestrial take that no one comprehends.
if you dont understand your iq is low
People acting like this is a gun problem and not a cultural one lmao.
Wether its a cultural problem or not its still a gun problem overall
Guns can’t choose people Sadge
you realize those are heavily intertwined right?
@@unclebary1866 people will still commit deadly assaults without guns.
True. This stuff was very rare back then. One of my theories is that the rise internet has a big role in forming these killers. The fact that they can hide from reality and be on the internet looking at conspiracies and dangerous content all day makes me think.
The thing is most of these are premeditated, these people will/would stop at nothing to get a hold of a firearm. And its not as simple as banning or setting a specific age. Theres simply so many bad people out there and changing the rules wont help if they wont abide by those rules.
People acting like banning guns would actually do something to the criminals. Braindead EU chatters when a robber comes in with a gun and they don’t have a way to defend themselves lmfao
so there is no point in trying braindead take. should drug control not happen because you cannot stop people taking drugs?
Shit, you hit the nail right on the head.
The same could be said about abortion and yet the same people who say "bans don't work" have so much time, energy, and money to have abortions banned 🤷🤷🤷
All freedoms and no "government overeach" unless of course it's something we don't agree with... Like abortion 🤷🇺🇲💪
Yes, and they compare gun laws to my home country of AU. When AU is completely different to the USA. The USA has borders with two countries, Mexico which has a high density of guns and Canada which has an average density. It is easier to smuggle guns into the USA than it is to AU. Also the government can't afford to pay out every single gun owner in America in a buy back scheme, nor would anyone aside from democratic bootlickers actually give them away.
I thought chat was memeing before he said he was the one who caught EDP lol
POG missed this upload truly an honor to react you mr. cow
9:29 background checks have been legally mandated for years. Every single anti gun individual there, as well as every single anti second amendment and gun chatter, is blatantly uninformed/ignorant, wether willfully or not. It’s unfathomably saddening and horrifying at the same time, that there is such a large portion of the population who genuinely do not believe in the validity and practicality of the preservation of human rights for all. You have a human right to defend yourself by any means necessary and those saying otherwise are brainless arms of an unseen, unconscious tyrant called misinformation
Here's some information. You can easily defend yourself with a sidearm. For a kid that just turned 18 to try and buy an automatic weapon should take a lot more than a background check. Honestly he's buying those weapons in generals is ridiculous, but they should at least be kept out of the hands of depressed children
Dude, a 13 year old shouldn’t be able to buy a fkn AR, I don’t remember if it was CNN or Fox News, but they sent a 13 year old with a hidden camera to buy an AR and it only took him 10 minutes to get it, they didn’t ask for any paper work
@@avik9661 it was CNN, but don't tell him that. He'll just say it's propaganda, and even though it might be, it still hints at the bigger picture that kids can get guns easier and younger than they can gamble or drink alcohol
@@avik9661 that’s been debunked like literally hundreds of times lol. Steven crowder also did an undercover operation of the same sorts and went to literally countless gun stores, markets, gun shows etc. and literally everyone laughed in his face for even asking to purchase a gun without a background check. Use your brain. No business is going to risk going to federal prison and losing their livelihood and ruining their legacy and family’s form of sustenance to sell a single firearm to someone for $1000.
@@bosaki8244 idk if it was propaganda or not, but it was most certainly not an accurate picture of reality. Look at literally any other undercover investigation of the same sorts and they all show that no one in their right mind is going to risk going to prison and losing their business to sell a single $1000 gun. Side note, the biggest owner of firearms in the country (the ATF, yes the government) has been caught funneling guns illegally to cartels. But let’s all hand our guns over to them right? Because the government is…. inherently…. more…. trustworthy? tha- …. that’s the take? ??
22:40 soooo fucking sad she’s just listening to the song over and over holding onto that sweet memory 😭😭
Fr, there's no reason to have an AR-15. It's only purpose is to kill alot very very fast.
If kids gotta go through gun drills and they gotta constantly have "those talks" with their parents, then these grown adults can go through a through background check and interview
@@outsider2.08 I mean idk about that I agree that someone in high school shouldn’t be allowed to buy one but I use them for hunting and range purposes all the time it’s just a hobby and yes if someone decided to want to try and harm me or my family I’m well equipped and will defend my self but I’m not gonna go on some rampage killing spree so why shouldn’t I be allowed to own one
@Femboy Friday "the 😂 emojis 😥 completely 🤗 ruined 🤓 any 😲 emotional 😴weight 😢 your 😤 comment 😧 carried 😱"
@@wheeldollabeel aye bruh, as long as you go through the proper channels, thats cool. They should just be extremely hard to get
And about background checks. No background check will stop a kid who has no record of violence from raising a flag. It is the people who have not done a crime or shown aggression before that slip through the cracks the most easiest. Maybe the red flag laws that are being proposed that will allow those that are normally unable to communicate to authorities of potential danger from being able to purchase weapons is a possibility, but that is starting to police people's thoughts instead of actions which seems like it could be a very slippery slope. You can think of killing someone, but until you actually do it, it is only a thought.
Oh hey, this guy has fantasies about murdering people, but that shouldn't mean he can't buy a gun: "policing people's thoughts is a slippery slope"
It's called a psych evaluation my guy.
Exactly most these attackers have been under 20, prolly a squeaky clean record. Idk what they expect a background check with their school counselor 💀
It doesn't matter if it's only a thought. We can't wait until somebody actually kills someone, or even themselves, to go "we should start watching their behavior".
There are people that are a danger to those around them and to themselves and the only thing stopping them from doing the unspeakable are the minimal barriers that are in place, like their age.
No larger barrier will stop these things from happening completely, but the point is to save as many lives as possible
Let me know if I'm misinterpreting your words
What about a psychological background check? A legal one might not find anything, but having to sit down with a trained and licensed psychologist might have stopped this.
@@Helloooooo123 you cant own "the military ones" without extensive paperwork and background checks because "the military ones" are automatic.
The guy who caught edp ruined law enforcements chances of actually punishing him
RIP to all the children and adults lost
7:10 This guy is right though, in the past, there weren't as many shootings and whatever as today. Also, I am not from the US, but I do live in a country where firearms are legal for citizens, although, there strict rules in here, and you gotta have background checks, tests etc, but people do hold firearms in here, and there almost never have been any shootings or whatever among citizens. Citizens in my country hold firearms to protect themselves against terrorists.
U could say the same for US tho
@@troyboi7662 Yes, The majority in the US that hold guns do not go around and kill people, but the laws aren’t as strict as they should be. Also, I believe it’s not just guns, people in the US are very tribalistic, especially since the last 5 years, and iirc, mental illness is wide and spread among people in the US, and I think this also contributes to the whole situation.
@@zkatom3773 I agree about the mental Inness part. That’s the main issue. We gotta fix that first. Even if all guns in the US were miraculously taken, pepl would still find ways to kill pepl in mass. Like bombs for example.
@@troyboi7662 I don’t agree with taking guns away from the citizens, it’s impossible at this point. What I do think is that the laws need to be stricter, and the police need to work harder to stop incidents like this to ever happen, just like how terrorism is being prevented from happening.
the reason you guys don't have any mass shootings is because you take it out on the Palestinians Aware
I'm pro-gun because all I need to do is look at my parent's homeland and see how banning guns there turned out. Which made powerful and violent criminal organizations that lowered the standard of living for everyone.
Correlation does not imply causation
Its more complex than that. Lol. I like guns but people like you are terrible at defending. If you rely on the NRA then your not a pro gun.
Even the with the same laws like US some countries handle it better than the US.
@@capitalismftw504 Hows is it more complex than that government bans guns therefore the common person can legally defend themselves but criminal organizations buy said firearms and use them against the citizens in crimes such as theft, drugs, and sex trafficking. Also, I never said that I'm for the NRA but how relying on a pro-gun organization is not pro-gun. Lastly, how do some countries handle it better than the US we don't place in the top 10 in mass shootings compared to the EU.
@@imnotaweeb2982 We have #1 in most school shootings from 2009-2018 by over 2 hundred and fucking eighty. Not to mention an estimated 70% of ALL mass shootings in developed countries happen in the US.
@@melonheadgaming4254 🤓
This is such a depressing situation, seeing as how nothing will realistically change any time soon. From my perspective the cause of all these mass shootings is the degeneration of American society and the lack of a strong central culture which everyone should be required to assimilate to, and feel a sense of belonging to. The ease of acquiring firearms certainly plays a part, but that is nowhere near the main cause of these shootings. The tools that people have access to will not stop them from inflicting harm on others. The US has been destroying itself for years and at this point I don't see any positive outcomes for the nation any time soon. I'm glad I left
You sound like a fascist lmao. The problem is the availability of guns
The us is 10000% lost
lol who gives a faq we all gonna die anyway
Yeah, democrat policies kinda fked us.
social media plays a large role in all of this
what is the NCS song called at 11:54 ?? please any1? its looks like mix between Energy and some epic songs from hans zimmer
The math doesn't math on how he had 4k to buy a DD Ar15 that retails close to 2k, a 700 dollar Eotech to go ontop, another rifle(benefit of the doubt it's a pawn shop AR around 600-700$), a bunch of ammo, and a bullet proof vest.
When you see an old man running around with 2 pillows and an american flag talking about communism, that tells you everything you need to know.
Here in Indonesia, we're more afraid of people holding a machette or a knife than people pointing a gun at us. Nobody owns a gun here unless you're a security guard or a police officer.
I’d rather get shot than chopped by a machete tbh
Sounds like you guys need common assault machete control
I've heard the same thing about Middle-Eastern countries but almost opposite.
Apparently the locals get used to seeing rifles and machine guns, but when they see knives and pistols, they know its serious.
x def mentally aged even while streaming, and you can tell by how some of his takes chamged over time
i think even if he presents himself 90% of the time as an actual inbred ape he still has good takes on soc/pol issues
It’s the money.. and he is still not quite a mature adult..
@@gadawg775 shut up
@@gadawg775 about
@@gadawg775 the
More background checks, introduce gun permits, less gun availability in general ideally.
Give an option to obtain stuff like AR after they've used "regular" guns for some year(s), and got through some more rigorous tests.
If people want the option to own any type of gun, that's fine, but they shouldn't be able to obtain it so easily and impulsively.
You should know how to handle it, you should have your brain and record checked, you should get a sense of respect towards and responsibility of having a gun.
1:55 I was exactly like X.. From 'yeah the guy make sense' to 'what?' in an instant
the founding fathers literally supported private citizens having warships lmao, i think they would be ok with you owning a rifle
The founding fathers dont live in 2022 why do we care what they think? Were they thinking about what the ancestors of 1400 might think of their decisions?
Yeah because the next school shooting will use a warship
where's your tactical nuke ? why is it banned ? why can't we ban riffles ?
@@Joe-xm3uc shall not be infringed
@@unclebary1866 mate, i hate to tell you this. But, i think that what he meant. Bringing up founding fathers is literally useless since they are subjected to a different time and etc.
Reminder: 13>50
I thought this was a video about the NBA conference…
It was, lebron was there and everything
NRA have nothing to do with shooting hoops, only people Kkona
@@unclebary1866 he was there crying about the shooting and then went on to lick the boots of china.
Ironic fucking hell
9:55 I think he was being sarcastic, it's just that the accent doesn't help.
Just like the argument against games, only america deals with such gun problems even though mental health problems aren't unique to USA
Whose gonna tell these people that AR doesn't stand for assault rifle?
Mass shootings have happened several times before.
*People die, people grieve, nothing changes, repeat.*
And despite all of that, it's constant arguing.
As an Australian, I can just sit back and watch it all unfold.
"RPG's in civilian hands"? Wtf
2a “right to bear arms” this even at the time of writing meant even things like warships fitting with cannons strong enough to wipe costal cities of the map
RPGs are considered Firearms so with proper registration it is possible to own one. Of course there are some restrictions aswell, for example in California an RPG is considered a "destructive device" so that prevents you from having one. Also you can't fire explosive ammunition, just like how you can own 40mm grenade launchers, you can't own explosive ammo with it.
xQcBased
@@manuelmoralez2257 The founding fathers weren't fucking idiots like everyone says. Of course they knew gun power would advance it was advancing before their eyes!
That got me shook too
always funny seeing NA in their natural habitat
22 children dead hehe im EU pepega im gonna make an NA joke xD
These are the most fringe NA people
Try looking at places like African countries or mainland Asian countries. You think NA is bad? LUL
@@dip9995 you are coping, this is the half of the population of the United States, this is the population that voted trump into office.
NA =/= USA man. Canada doesn't have this issue
Channel 5 reminds me that we’re living in a South Park episode.
9:00 Really wondering if he realized that it's not about buying a gun taking longer but more about how exactly stricter gun control is enforced. We hear alot of rhetoric on both sides about how people of certain religions or beliefs are more likely to be terrorists and how long before this is just the left-wing patriot act? a bs legislation that promises to solve a problem it never does at the cost of the average american's freedom.
It kind of makes you realize how out of touch he is with politics when he assumes that stricter gun control just means that it takes longer, rather than selectively choosing certain types of people with mental illnesses or ideological backgrounds that are no longer allowed to own a gun ever because they posted an edgy tweet 7 years ago.
as much as I like these reactions chat and X were acting pretty idiotic at the end. Was kinda cringe but whatever. xqcL
I own a ar15 and pistol at the age of 19, it never leaves home unless im going to the range and it's always unloaded when at home unless it is specifically on me for protection when I am home alone.
There are sane gun owners and there should be no reason why I shouldn't have these items if they're purely recreational and for home self-defense.
Also 9:06 is the smartest thing Felix has ever said surrounding guns, im proud of him.
I mean if everyone made sure to look after their guns like you it would be a different story.
There SHOULD be no reason, but are you really saying there IS no reason? Is what happened not a good reason to put restrictions on what weapons you can acquire? Look at other countries besides the US and why they dont have this problem nearly as much as we do, because there is no weapons like we have to do them.
There already are restrictions, do you know how hard it was for me to legally obtain a pistol before the age of 21? Everything I do related to it even if it's to buy a holster or go to the range is reported to the authorities including for example how many rounds I use at the range, where I take it, and what I buy relating to anything related to it. I am in no way out of the sights of the state police they know me and what I do without a missing detail.
@@todbaner3385 which is how I'd like it to be, but mentally ill people seem to not be able to make the right choices as others like myself.
@@TR13400 Also brining up other countries has the be the most idiotic and widespread "argument" there is and you know why. In 1997 most of Englands guns were taken forcefully and heavy laws were put on, same as in 1996-97 for Australia. We do not have this, and really maybe we should too. However, it is not going to be a thing people give up so easily because people like me will fight to keep them in the hands of good people and take them away from others who don't deserve it. Ypu're also forgetting the amount of illegal guns our country can't seem to get rid of, and I wonder why.
i hope they will make special paperwork for requiring computer becouse "u" might be a potential hacker
hacking actually requires skill, squeezing a trigger does not.
A bit different because to be a hacker you have to have extensive knowledge of computers and code - to be a school shooter you have be an American citizen with two arms and a heartbeat. Even if you did require paperwork to use a computer because of the damage someone could cause with it, I think most people would do the paperwork lol
dumbfck take. try again
@@joefather8822 actually that’s not true have you shot a gun before
Because more then likely without proper training you are gonna have terrible aim
What's next, you need to have a license to operate a toaster?
U CANNOT CHANGE THE 2ND AMENDMANT what's that word ey amend
You have to be 21 to buy a beer but 18 to buy an AR
Drinking a beer isn't a constitutional right;
@@CoconutJewce and you cant say certain stuff without going to jail, but free speech is a constitutional right!
and some things need to be changed so bad things don't happen 🤡
why do you think Switzerland and Australia don't have mass shootings happen every week?
I can just tell you have zero brain power and regurgitate what your hog dad and mom say
@@CoconutJewce Damn Right brUTheR I need a tank it’s my constitutional right
@@van7915 it isnt actually
@@Robert-fc9xz WTF bRutHer
11:14 Ayoooo someone in the chat said "this bitch looks like my grandpa" OMEGALUL
sometimes xqc seems too careful not to sound like hasan and rather tries to stay "neutral" even in situations like this.
fr instead of calling out racism or something he’ll be like “i’d rather not speak on this chat”
Unironically a centrist to the core. Mfer will give one political take, then the next one he says completely contradicts what he said before.
The man is afraid to even touch either side because he knows chat will explode either way.
@@dirkjohnson9627 Racism isn't real, it just means anti white and people who are jealous of whites.
@@_DMNO_ chat, and twitter, if he says something left he's a libtard, right then he's getting cancelled. Can't blame him tbh
Something I think we can all agree on is that the media publicising the names of shooters only encourages that behaviour.
I seriously doubt these shooters do these atrocious acts for clout of all things but idk
@@solidsnakeshugecake no they dont, but it does contribute to it ; to a certain degree
9:46 How the fuck did X and chat completely miss this man's point.
22:22 Whoever in chat says "OMEGALUL PRAYERS" in a situation like this... I don't even know. Its just not the time or place. Religious or not, believe in prayers or not... what the hells wrong with this chatter
imagine you live in a country where mass shootings happen all the time.
imagine every time a mass shooting happens, NOTHING changes, absolutely nothing, even the bare minimum.
Imagine every time this happens, the people not wanting change yells "thoughts and prayers". for years on end.
this is what happened for the chatter, probably. done with the bullshit "lets just pray and ignore it". i agree, its insensitive, but it's also the reality. prayers wont fix shit
@@bast1an975 yeah
Obnoxious athiests smh
What do you expect from twitch? It's like twitters younger sibling who mimics everything it foes
honestly the review from asmongold on this clip had went incredibly in depth in comparison to this clip.
Why? Why does shit like this happen man? It’s like I’m in Don’t Look Up, there is an existential threat yet people are so blatantly ignorant, disrespectful, hurtful. This feels so easy to implement, but for some FUCKING REASON people don’t want things to change. Until it happens to their friends, families, sons, daughters, parents, cousins, I’m just tired. I fucking can’t with this country…
Move. Chicago is in my state. You can’t have a gun in the city but that doesn’t stop criminals and it never will. What it will do is prevent you from having any ability to protect yourselves, especially if you defund police. Which I kind of support that last part, since I’m more than capable of defending myself. I’ve had more of an Arsenal than my local police for decades and have never shot anyone with it. Just don’t break in.
It isn't easy to implement actually. A ban on AR's means a ban on all semi-auto rifles.
People are not stupid, they know that if SAR's get banned, then its the semi-auto shotguns and the semi-auto pistols next.
After that, what will we have to defend ourselves from criminals? Fucking revolvers, lever-actions, and bolt-actions? We'd be fighting with 1800's tech against 2000's tech.
Give gun control advocates an inch, and they will take a mile. Because I guarantee you, it will not stop at AR's. It never does.
Implement what
The only way to prevent things like this from happening is by adding people's mental status to their background information. Then, people with mental issues can be prevented from owning firearms. Also, there needs to be a federal age limit for firearm ownership. Maybe 25+ years old for gun ownership just to be safe.
@@chiliflis8660 First, mental health history is already checked before a firearm purchase. (I hope you meant something else by that because this just seems ignorant)
Second, mental health checks are useless against those who have never been institutionalized, which is most school shooters seeing as they are usually children who have been ignored when they have displayed unhealthy behavior.
Third, an age limit would be a bandaid fix, because many school shooters obtain weapons illegally, often from their parents when they neglect to put them in a safe location.
Rather than pushing for useless restrictions, think about promoting better mental health support and security in schools. We can hide under the covers all we want and pretend that there aren't monsters out there, but there are, and the best way to deal with them isn't throwing out ineffective laws, the best way is to help people before they can become monsters.
i really respect how x always gives his honest take right off the bat when he sees something. he’s not looking for anyone else or chat to agree with him he just speaks what he believes
he literally said at the end that he doesnt have an opinion because he doesnt want to look like a dumb fuck. xqc's opinion is that of hasan and his surface level understanding of politics that is fed to him through social media
he is literally so scared so say anything because twitch will ban the fuck out of him for not leaning left wing in every take he gives even if its common sense. society has gone to pure shit.
@Cx LUL I bet he has better takes on topics than you 99.9% of the time.
Not really tbh he always gives half a take because he's scared of being cancelled or whatever. It's esp annoying when the take he's about to give is really not even controversial
@@cockernugget48 true its annoying as hell best he not talk at all if hes gonna skirt around it to make sure the kids on either "side" get mad at him on discord or twitter
not to be a cringe lord, but an ar 15 is not an assault rifle, a woman goes on to say she has a handgun, but semi-automatic guns should not be allowed, modern handguns are semi automatic. Almost every commercially available gun is semi-automatic. An ar15 is semi automatic, it's not an assault rifle, it stands for arma light, the difference between an ar15 and a handgun is not the mechanism of fire, but the rounds, long barrel etc. I'm not pro gun/anti-gun, I don't even care, it's just all of the information is completely wrong
I don’t have a problem with a normal person saying assault rifle because they don’t know about guns. I do have a problem when they use that term to make the gun sound scary. Assault rifle is a lot more scary sounding than semi automatic rifle
The loss of the atomic family is a good point for a lot of current issues. XQC is also right that tho that things have changed in many other aspects. Social media is a huge component, kids don’t only get bullied at school now it comes home with them on social media. Not having fathers and the current climate that dads are just buffoons doesn’t help.
Meh. Other countries have guns, and other countries follow the trends of western culture of abandoning the nuclear family. But other countries don't have mass shootings en masse.
@@haarisbutt2075 Nuclear is the word I was looking for, thanks for that. Your right with other countries that adopt some western cultures not having this particular issue. I’m sure kids get bullied the same everywhere and probably similar with single parent homes. It’s almost a phenomenon because people are people no matter the country. The media and government propaganda don’t help anything
When people say that not having fathers are a part of it, are they just talking about general parental help and guidance? Why fathers specifically?
wtf is an "assault weapon"?
they mean big guns
@@turewidstrom9200 i mean it is a real term used to discuss gun legislation
@@unclebary1866 They say “assault weapons” instead of assault rifle to purposely make it ambiguous. You can use anything as a weapon to assault someone. Maybe they should learn about how guns work before they try to ban them. A gun can’t walk and shoot people itself. Someone has to load it and pull the trigger for it to shoot.
Anything that looks scary
something that looks scary with a matt black finish
Problem with going beyond background checks is that we might be soft locked through the law out of all gun ownership, imagine that instead of the “quick” checks we have now you need to have manual checks by the fbi they could just say “we’re working on it” after multiple months and then just never do anything.
Difficulty in getting guns is vastly different varying by state, some states take multiple months and extensive paper work while in others you only need a few hours after a background check
Also semi auto weaponry is very important for anybody who has to face up to nature on a regular basis, imagine a hundred feral hogs charging your property and you aren’t able to use semi-auto weapons to defend yourself. That teacher the fat short woman wants you ti use only bolt action weapons, it’s impossible to stop those hogs without sufficient fire power
@@blankrealist8872 well obviously but if you want to own a semi automatic weapon, and you seriously need it, you should be able to and want to go through all the loops and holes you have to go through to get one.
Canada has stricter gun laws, farmers still own firearms and big gubermint doesn't withhold firearms from people who go through the process. If you actually want to know more you can go watch Vice's "armed and reasonable" video which shows a canadian citizen's process of acquiring a fire arm license and training.
As for 100 feral hogs charging you at once i think you might be worried about the wrong kind of pigs.
@@blankrealist8872 that tiny number of people could get a special license after proving their need for it then. Acting like it’s an unsolvable problem and we have to accept nutters shooting up schools so 5 farmers can defend themselves against an organised hog invasion
the were giving away magazines not ammo lmao
Yeah like it's weird and I definitely don't think kids should be allowed there but I see nothing really wrong with giving out a few magazines/rounds. Not much you can do with that without getting a gun to fire it with
Yeah dude, comment in a VoD, surely he'll listen.
@@HoloTWWOriginal I’m preeeeeetty sure they don’t allow kids to just walk in there, they are probably accompanied by their parents or some sort of adult.
@@Zincmentomint yeah I know and they shouldn't be allowed
@@Zincmentomint surely they are Clueless
. People are not out there in mass in the streets going on shooting sprees or killing each other with grenade launchers etc.
School shootings still take place in countries where the semi automatic weapons are not available and where firearms are not available. And the number of victims is not really that different. What would change is the effectiveness of the shooter.
The reason for these shootings are the conditions at home and at the school. Don’t shift the blame.
You're pulling this out of your ass. Quick google shows USA with 288 school shootings followed by Mexico 8 school shootings from 2009 to 2018, that's not even close.
That lunch box simile about how his hands smelled was really something lol…