It is always great to see an old steam locomotive get restored, but narrow gauge engines, they have something into consider. They are some of the most unique steam locomotives around.
I saw her on a photo charter in 2013 and it was one of the most amazing sights I've ever seen. since that day 315 has been my favorite locomotive and arguably my personality. I was very lucky to see her in a photo charter last year in 2023 and boy shes a good engine
Always enjoy watching steam locomotives.
This is a certified Rio Grande Moment
It is always great to see an old steam locomotive get restored, but narrow gauge engines, they have something into consider. They are some of the most unique steam locomotives around.
I saw her on a photo charter in 2013 and it was one of the most amazing sights I've ever seen. since that day 315 has been my favorite locomotive and arguably my personality. I was very lucky to see her in a photo charter last year in 2023 and boy shes a good engine
I like the Rio Grande 315 😀
Same here
The echo of the whistle in the hills and mountains are fantastic! And mystical!
Gotta love Rio Grande #315!
Yep
Awesome video 🚂👍🚃
315 is a movie star
That’s right
@@csxrailfanbronyzachbecker2105 she appeared in Colorado territory 1949 and Around the World in 80 Days 1956
@@rogerlollar4325 I see
Nice, hey can you do the Illinois railway museum full show next ?
The Goose is cool!!! Very creative! Having been to Durango many times I have seen it up close!
Awesome Video I Like Rio Grande 315
That reminds me of a book that I read when I was younger called the little engine 🚂 that could
❤
@13:17, I wonder how long this cute little locomotive has worn this 5 chime steam whistle?
I wonder how long 315 has sported that whistle at 13:18
0:00, Where have I heard that Intro Scene before?
NO, It Can’t Be. The Memories of watching Alphabet Train when I was little, it’s all Returning.
wow thanks o all. who is the engineer?
Will there be a video on the Cumbres and Toltec itself?
It was numbered 425 not 420
That was the information that was what was in the various print articles in 2008 when this was produced. Obviously that was incorrect.