Zep-Tepi civilization is 800,000years old Osiris was the last God Pharaoh ,we know the Information,do more search if you are going to talk about something we have known and Kept quite about until the little king comes back,We are known as Ancient Ones.
I keep finding it interesting that the stars of Orion 10,500 bc aligned with the pyramid, and was also during the age of Leo, hence the sphinx. But then if you add another 26,000 years for another great cycle, we come to the 36,500 bc timeline. And then the emerald tablets say then is when Thoth supposedly ruled Egypt. Which would mean that maybe there was an even earlier flood around that time. Very curious. Also ancient Egyptian texts speak of the land of reeds, and it is said that after the great flood settled down, the only thing left standing above the water after people re-emerged was the reeds. Interesting stuff. Edit: I wrote this before I finished watching. I was surprised to see that they came to the same conclusion!! Whatever you believe, it’s fascinating to say the least.
Life itself is billions of years old... So therefore there could have been millions of different living beings that inhabited the earth millions of times over.. We are the remnants of that ancient time and we had to start all over from the stone age in caves.. We walk around with amnesia because civilizations before us killed off all the story tellers and destroyed the cultures before we could get the knowledge
I am an Indian Hindu and according to the ancient Hindu scriptures of India, humans are BILLIONS of years old and are NOT NATIVE to Earth. Here is merely SOME evidence suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago: * A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago * A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years * Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old * Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years * Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years * Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years * An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years (eoliths, which are chipped pebbles thought to be the earliest known tools, at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old). * A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years * Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy * Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years * Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years. How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of: * Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years * An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years * Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old * More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago * Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years * Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years * An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years. There's still more. In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years. In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints. In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations. But some other discoveries do. In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today. In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age. A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old. In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old. On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old. Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries. According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years. In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago. What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species.
The evidence that civilization has risen and fallen repeatedly seems to me indisputable, though I can hardly miss that mainstream archaeology absolutely refuses to countenance the possibility of any such thing, and even seems determined to not even examine the evidence that appears routinely. For a budding archaeologist to decide to look into the information you have listed would be the death knell of their career, and that is a shame. Eventually the ubiquitous availability of such information will begin to turn the field toward a more open examination, as the public loses trust and interest in the mundane and no longer likely scenarios old people such as myself were raised to believe. When the professionals finally decide to act like professionals, humanity is going to find out that our history is beyond anything we ever imagined.
this is ridiculous. Ever heard of chromosomes Humans share 96% of our DNA with Chimpanzees. How zat fit into your philosophy Did one branch of humans devolve into monkeys? Looking to religion for answers to science is a waste of time open to the interpretation of a misguided ignorant fool. Not you of coarse
When a judge has to make a decision, they cannot look at one thing, and base their decision on it. They must consider ALL the evidence. So you shouldn't dismiss the entire archaeological consensus, bc of a few red herrings. Try to see the forest for the trees. balance out your narrative by researching the other side of the debate. Try to understand why they come to different conclusions.
the white race was in CAVES in these times. You must understand that first sir. Only one race can sit in that 140degree sunlight for 800+ years. Understand your history sir. It'll hurt but it's ok.
@@MIB_63 Because the truth would blast away the monoteist religions: the prophets, for instance, are said to be political leaders from lost civilizations, not "God chosen leaders" or whatever. The truth would shake the Western world (not the Asian civilizations:: India and China). The truth may come by chance: an earthwake that exposes secret vaults in broad day light, close to an urban area, impossible to be closed by the governments in few minutes.
Interesting, very well made. Going with knowledge from the American CIA, I believe that the Egypt Pyramids are 2 million years old. Which co-exists when the Pyramids in Cydonia on Mars were abandoned and the martian occupants travelled to Earth. Cairo translates into Mars.
I am an Indian Hindu and according to the ancient Hindu scriptures of India, humans are BILLIONS of years old and are NOT NATIVE to Earth. Here is merely SOME evidence suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago: * A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago * A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years * Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old * Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years * Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years * Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years * An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years (eoliths, which are chipped pebbles thought to be the earliest known tools, at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old). * A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years * Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy * Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years * Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years. How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of: * Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years * An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years * Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old * More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago * Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years * Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years * An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years. There's still more. In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years. In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints. In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations. But some other discoveries do. In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today. In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age. A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old. In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old. On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old. Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries. According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years. In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago. What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species.
I am an Indian Hindu and according to the ancient Hindu scriptures of India, humans are BILLIONS of years old and are NOT NATIVE to Earth. Here is merely SOME evidence suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago: * A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago * A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years * Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old * Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years * Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years * Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years * An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years (eoliths, which are chipped pebbles thought to be the earliest known tools, at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old). * A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years * Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy * Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years * Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years. How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of: * Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years * An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years * Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old * More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago * Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years * Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years * An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years. There's still more. In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years. In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints. In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations. But some other discoveries do. In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today. In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age. A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old. In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old. On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old. Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries. According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years. In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago. What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species.
I like that idea about the “time stamp”. Basically, the original builders of the Giza Plateau Pyramids knew that time and weathering would make it near impossible to date the structures thousands of years in the future, so they aligned them with the stars as a “fool proof” way to keep fools from misinterpreting the dates. Impressive!
One day they will be able to view the past, with Chrono-Vision. Time Travel on TV. See any Time in History. Some say it already exists. See the real builders of the Pyramids. See Moses Parting the Sea. You would never have a dull moment. Just Imagine.
could radio carbon dating be influenced by wave collapse due to constant surveillance? as in some how observance influences the decay rate to be steady when maybe its a bit more random naturally? just thinking from a philosophical side as im no scientist.
C-14 dating is based off of half life of carbon, so observation hasn't shown/proven to change decay rate, but it is well known that the farther back you go in time the less accurate the dating becomes
The Great Pyramid has absolutely nothing to do with Khufu. It was built by the Mighty King and Magician, Djehuti as a chamber of initiation with the sarcophagus in the kings chamber in which the Mystery Student lays within signifying the heart( when you consider the Great Pyramid structure itself as a mystical representation of Man)
Don't the two countries have a 'dwarf male god' that is associated with fertility, birth and something else? Also found in ancient Mexiso and South America?
the Billy Meier contact reports contain this info: the three original pyramids were built 73,000 years ago by people from the Orion system. The sphinx and lesser pyramids were built by Cheops. also - the Pharos up until Tut were long-skulls who's race arrived 390,000 years ago.
Pyramids on the Geiza plateau were used by the Anunnaki/Alien to create humans 50k years ago. Like ancient hospitals used for creating humans. The chambers in the pyramids are made of granite. Quartz, marble, and granite are three of our best bacteria-resistant stone.
The clock on the arms of the anunaki. I believe its a venus clock. From the golden age. When saturn was our sun. Watch. Symbols of an alien sky. And you will se it. Pfases of venus just like the moon pfases.
The "gods" were actually Denisovans? The central pillars at gobekli tepi are not symbolic, they are actual, physical representations of giant hominids, Denisovans, erected to scale with the surrounding smaller pillars of humans?
The first people on earth came from a dying planet called Mars by us today. They built pyramids there that were a mile high and the ancient city on Mars is still intact. Some of the people escaped to the early Earth as their planet was completely devastated. Check out Joe Mcmoneagle and his experience on Mars. Also John Brandenberg's xenon 129 hypothesis on Mars. If you want unfiltered information don't use Wikipedia just find some podcasts featuring them on TH-cam.
Agree 100% that the timeline of Egypt is much longer than historians acknowledge (see Hieroglyphs: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly on my channel) but such a shame that Bauval's Orion 'correlation' theory is still doing the rounds when the Ancient Architects and Sacred Geometry Decoded channels both debunked this claim years ago - it's not a match today or at any time in the past.
but you can see it's a match, so is Teotihuacan. 3 structures, one slightly off center when a line is drawn thru.....i think the flower of life info says where on the plateau there is a walled hole that represents Sirius
@@moonwatch7963 Even the interviewee in this documentary only goes as far as saying 'almost exactly'. Both the channels mentioned found the same thing using Stellarium: It's not a match today and the farther back you go the more the error compounds with the Pyramid of Menkaure. The Mexican pyramids are not the same arrangement as Giza.
@@blackmud What's their explanation for the smaller pyramids being off center then? It wouldn't have been built off center without a good reason. Mirroring the sky doesn't have to mean the stars pass overhead!
😊😊 🎉 Very good post and informative in many ways. To go much deeper into this topic, check this out. This book, "Etymology Of Compendiums Of All Gods and the Almighty Creator" by Samuel K. Anderson is a Non-fiction book full of Anthropological,Archeological, Linguistic, Mathematical, Scientific, and Morden-Day Descendants Evidences of the Origin of Everything in our universe, galaxies, and intergalactic realms.
Let's get a grip here..IF..IF there was a 100 foot deep sea on the Giza Plateau, where are the remains of Sea Creatures?? Lots of sea animals and plants should be stuck on the pyramids and scattered deep in the sands of what should have been an ocean bottom..Those critters and plants aren't there.
How a is It ?? Please Explain , In EGYPT, As In So, Many Other Megalitic/ PreAntideluvian Sites... The Oldest Quote Native Occupping Cultures, Can Not Come a close To Their Supposed Contemperaneous Rev3nt Ancestors, Precision, Size Weight And Purpose(Debated Thus)😮
Why do you put BCE? Are you ashamed of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ? Or are you just folding under the pressure of the principalities and entities of this realm?
Since god, little g, And the "SUN" of god, little g Are Only Real Inside The Thoroughly Programmed From Early Childhood By Faux religions $heep-le's Orbs, Then, So-Called god, little g, And the "SUN" of god, little g, And allah, little a, And $atan, little s, aka the devil, little d, And the lord, little l Do Not Unfortunately Exist . . . Ouch . . . Kindly Go Away, Thoroughly Programed $heep-le . . .
You pretend to be a Christian then you should understand to act Christlike and don’t criticize the fact that not everybody worships delusional saviors to overcome their fear of death
Don't know the book, not sure where you're finding racism here. Do you mean that much later in time, maybe from first through third dynasties, many of the portrayed, and therefore presumed important, Egyptians had negroid features? Yep, they sure did. What we can conclude is that there wasn't so much racial prejudice going around in those days. Beautiful looking people, dark in colour, were coming down the Nile from places in Africa and finding welcome in lower Egypt, intermarrying at will. Things pre-Christian seemed so much better.
8,000+ Films, Shows & Classes on Gaia. Start Your Free Trial - cs-link.gaia.com/4fRs2rO
Zep-Tepi civilization is 800,000years old Osiris was the last God Pharaoh ,we know the Information,do more search if you are going to talk about something we have known and Kept quite about until the little king comes back,We are known as Ancient Ones.
I keep finding it interesting that the stars of Orion 10,500 bc aligned with the pyramid, and was also during the age of Leo, hence the sphinx. But then if you add another 26,000 years for another great cycle, we come to the 36,500 bc timeline. And then the emerald tablets say then is when Thoth supposedly ruled Egypt. Which would mean that maybe there was an even earlier flood around that time. Very curious.
Also ancient Egyptian texts speak of the land of reeds, and it is said that after the great flood settled down, the only thing left standing above the water after people re-emerged was the reeds. Interesting stuff.
Edit: I wrote this before I finished watching. I was surprised to see that they came to the same conclusion!! Whatever you believe, it’s fascinating to say the least.
Life itself is billions of years old... So therefore there could have been millions of different living beings that inhabited the earth millions of times over.. We are the remnants of that ancient time and we had to start all over from the stone age in caves.. We walk around with amnesia because civilizations before us killed off all the story tellers and destroyed the cultures before we could get the knowledge
BCE. Before Common Era
I am an Indian Hindu and according to the ancient Hindu scriptures of India, humans are BILLIONS of years old and are NOT NATIVE to Earth. Here is merely SOME evidence suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago:
* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago
* A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years
* Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old
* Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years
* Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years
* Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years
* An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years (eoliths, which are chipped pebbles thought to be the earliest known tools, at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old).
* A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years
* Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy
* Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years
* Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years
Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
* Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years
* An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years
* Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old
* More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago
* Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years
* Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years
* An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago
But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years.
There's still more.
In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years.
In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints.
In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations.
But some other discoveries do.
In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today.
In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age.
A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old.
In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old.
On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old.
Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries.
According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years.
In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago.
What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species.
The evidence that civilization has risen and fallen repeatedly seems to me indisputable, though I can hardly miss that mainstream archaeology absolutely refuses to countenance the possibility of any such thing, and even seems determined to not even examine the evidence that appears routinely. For a budding archaeologist to decide to look into the information you have listed would be the death knell of their career, and that is a shame. Eventually the ubiquitous availability of such information will begin to turn the field toward a more open examination, as the public loses trust and interest in the mundane and no longer likely scenarios old people such as myself were raised to believe. When the professionals finally decide to act like professionals, humanity is going to find out that our history is beyond anything we ever imagined.
this is ridiculous. Ever heard of chromosomes Humans share 96% of our DNA with Chimpanzees. How zat fit into your philosophy Did one branch of humans devolve into monkeys? Looking to religion for answers to science is a waste of time open to the interpretation of a misguided ignorant fool. Not you of coarse
When a judge has to make a decision, they cannot look at one thing, and base their decision on it. They must consider ALL the evidence. So you shouldn't dismiss the entire archaeological consensus, bc of a few red herrings. Try to see the forest for the trees. balance out your narrative by researching the other side of the debate. Try to understand why they come to different conclusions.
Great write-up!
Thank you!!
We will never know all of the truth from back in that day.
Sadly, the people in power don't want us to know the truth from back in the day. I keep asking myself why?
the white race was in CAVES in these times. You must understand that first sir. Only one race can sit in that 140degree sunlight for 800+ years. Understand your history sir. It'll hurt but it's ok.
@MIB_63 dogmas, religious and others must be preserved ... the military industrial complex
Nothing is impossible in this Universe
@@MIB_63 Because the truth would blast away the monoteist religions: the prophets, for instance, are said to be political leaders from lost civilizations, not "God chosen leaders" or whatever. The truth would shake the Western world (not the Asian civilizations:: India and China). The truth may come by chance: an earthwake that exposes secret vaults in broad day light, close to an urban area, impossible to be closed by the governments in few minutes.
Thank you my friends 🤜🤛💞🌹🙏
Interesting,
very well made.
Going with knowledge from the American CIA,
I believe that the Egypt Pyramids are 2 million years old.
Which co-exists when the Pyramids in Cydonia on Mars were abandoned and the martian occupants travelled to Earth.
Cairo translates into Mars.
Very interesting - I hadn't heard of them being dated so far back before. Could you elaborate further or direct me to further information please?
That’s a stretch. The name doesn’t translate into mars. The original name of Cairo translates in to place or camp of mars.
ridonkulous
I am an Indian Hindu and according to the ancient Hindu scriptures of India, humans are BILLIONS of years old and are NOT NATIVE to Earth. Here is merely SOME evidence suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago:
* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago
* A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years
* Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old
* Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years
* Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years
* Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years
* An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years (eoliths, which are chipped pebbles thought to be the earliest known tools, at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old).
* A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years
* Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy
* Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years
* Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years
Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
* Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years
* An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years
* Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old
* More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago
* Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years
* Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years
* An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago
But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years.
There's still more.
In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years.
In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints.
In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations.
But some other discoveries do.
In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today.
In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age.
A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old.
In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old.
On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old.
Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries.
According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years.
In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago.
What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species.
I am an Indian Hindu and according to the ancient Hindu scriptures of India, humans are BILLIONS of years old and are NOT NATIVE to Earth. Here is merely SOME evidence suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago:
* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago
* A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years
* Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old
* Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years
* Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years
* Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years
* An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years (eoliths, which are chipped pebbles thought to be the earliest known tools, at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old).
* A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years
* Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy
* Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years
* Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years
Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
* Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years
* An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years
* Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old
* More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago
* Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years
* Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years
* An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago
But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years.
There's still more.
In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years.
In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints.
In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations.
But some other discoveries do.
In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today.
In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age.
A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old.
In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old.
On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old.
Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries.
According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years.
In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago.
What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species.
This is fascinating…
Super interesting!
11:18 and the Sphinx had a Lions head.
As Above, so below is a time stamp to the place and the builders to the Orion belt
I like that idea about the “time stamp”. Basically, the original builders of the Giza Plateau Pyramids knew that time and weathering would make it near impossible to date the structures thousands of years in the future, so they aligned them with the stars as a “fool proof” way to keep fools from misinterpreting the dates. Impressive!
The sphinx is a 25,920 year clock. Think about that. Who needs a 25,920 year clock?
Brilliant, thanks from Australia 😊🙏❤️🇦🇺🌏🌌
Love it thanks 😊
Ed Fu, Kung's long lost brother ... now found, hanging out in Egypt!
One day they will be able to view the past, with Chrono-Vision. Time Travel on TV. See any Time in History. Some say it already exists. See the real builders of the Pyramids. See Moses Parting the Sea. You would never have a dull moment. Just Imagine.
That would freak out a lot of religious people when they find out events weren't what they were led to believe.
Just imagine the monthly payment, even for the basic package.
Gotta love Phil Collins' accent.
Daniel Jackson deciphered the Stargate symbols that made quantam teleportation possible.
could radio carbon dating be influenced by wave collapse due to constant surveillance? as in some how observance influences the decay rate to be steady when maybe its a bit more random naturally? just thinking from a philosophical side as im no scientist.
C-14 dating is based off of half life of carbon, so observation hasn't shown/proven to change decay rate, but it is well known that the farther back you go in time the less accurate the dating becomes
everything is influenced by observation!
Several million clock cycles ago.....they changed the spinhx's head....
The Great Pyramid has absolutely nothing to do with Khufu. It was built by the Mighty King and Magician, Djehuti as a chamber of initiation with the sarcophagus in the kings chamber in which the Mystery Student lays within signifying the heart( when you consider the Great Pyramid structure itself as a mystical representation of Man)
Thank you for saying that. 👍🏻
You know this how? …as an initiate?!
@@j.d.estrill4538 Does it matter?
I mean the Power plant Theory Makes more sense With the chemicals found left over in the shafts
@@Minceontoast2that's why water channels were built.... Power plants need water for cooling....... Just like modern times.
Can you please do a video on:
Indian connection with Egypt
I think some Indian Ethnicity have resemblance with Egyptians.
South Indians
Don't the two countries have a 'dwarf male god' that is associated with fertility, birth and something else? Also found in ancient Mexiso and South America?
No extraneous E's! No Atheist cultural appropriation!
the Billy Meier contact reports contain this info: the three original pyramids were built 73,000 years ago by people from the Orion system. The sphinx and lesser pyramids were built by Cheops. also - the Pharos up until Tut were long-skulls who's race arrived 390,000 years ago.
I believe the pyramids at Giza are also step pyramids, and were built by the same master builder as all the others.
not possible check your timelines
You have some things slightly muddled up!
The name Egypt didn't come into fruition until 32BC. Why do people keep calling it Ancient Egypt and not by it's name, Kemet?
Also the case of hittit empire
The Sphinx wasn't a Lion so why do people keep trying to connect it to Leo? It was more likely a Jackal representing Anubis.
Reymond's book is totally unavailable: either very few were printed or those people who did buy it are loathe to sell it!
The kings of egypt were aliens but we are not allowed to know that perhaps annuaki
kings perhaps half anunaki's and the "gods" real anunnaki
Pyramids on the Geiza plateau were used by the Anunnaki/Alien to create humans 50k years ago. Like ancient hospitals used for creating humans. The chambers in the pyramids are made of granite. Quartz, marble, and granite are three of our best bacteria-resistant stone.
I always thought the pyramids were powerstations of a sort.
@@MIB_63 power plants yes.
Aliens 👽 say no more
Old news… read- GERALD MASSEY, ALBERT CHURCHWARD and/or RA UN NEFER
What does Zeus have to say about this?
Great Pyramid was a giant laser or 'maser' serving as a cosmic transceiver emitting the frequency of hydrogen at 1.42 GHz..
0:26 that's up there Is Palestine not Isrealhell
It always has been....since they reseted the world in 1920 it became Israël....no books before 1920 ever talked about Israël
Yes they should get it right
The clock on the arms of the anunaki. I believe its a venus clock. From the golden age. When saturn was our sun. Watch. Symbols of an alien sky. And you will se it. Pfases of venus just like the moon pfases.
Holy hot dogs its Silverine at 1:52
look back even further
The "gods" were actually Denisovans? The central pillars at gobekli tepi are not symbolic, they are actual, physical representations of giant hominids, Denisovans, erected to scale with the surrounding smaller pillars of humans?
Billy made it all the way to his doc before his unbecoming 😂
All pre deluvian
❤
Gerald Massey. That's kinda obscure. I tip my hat to you. I was in my mid twenties when I was turned on Gerald Massey.
Ppl forget the NILE floods
The first people on earth came from a dying planet called Mars by us today. They built pyramids there that were a mile high and the ancient city on Mars is still intact. Some of the people escaped to the early Earth as their planet was completely devastated. Check out Joe Mcmoneagle and his experience on Mars. Also John Brandenberg's xenon 129 hypothesis on Mars. If you want unfiltered information don't use Wikipedia just find some podcasts featuring them on TH-cam.
I think you would be far better off using Wikipedia.
Agree 100% that the timeline of Egypt is much longer than historians acknowledge (see Hieroglyphs: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly on my channel) but such a shame that Bauval's Orion 'correlation' theory is still doing the rounds when the Ancient Architects and Sacred Geometry Decoded channels both debunked this claim years ago - it's not a match today or at any time in the past.
but you can see it's a match, so is Teotihuacan. 3 structures, one slightly off center when a line is drawn thru.....i think the flower of life info says where on the plateau there is a walled hole that represents Sirius
@@moonwatch7963 Even the interviewee in this documentary only goes as far as saying 'almost exactly'. Both the channels mentioned found the same thing using Stellarium: It's not a match today and the farther back you go the more the error compounds with the Pyramid of Menkaure. The Mexican pyramids are not the same arrangement as Giza.
@@blackmud What's their explanation for the smaller pyramids being off center then? It wouldn't have been built off center without a good reason. Mirroring the sky doesn't have to mean the stars pass overhead!
😊😊 🎉 Very good post and informative in many ways. To go much deeper into this topic, check this out.
This book, "Etymology Of Compendiums Of All Gods and the Almighty Creator" by Samuel K. Anderson is a Non-fiction book full of Anthropological,Archeological, Linguistic, Mathematical, Scientific, and Morden-Day Descendants Evidences of the Origin of Everything in our universe, galaxies, and intergalactic realms.
Let's get a grip here..IF..IF there was a 100 foot deep sea on the Giza Plateau, where are the remains of Sea Creatures?? Lots of sea animals and plants should be stuck on the pyramids and scattered deep in the sands of what should have been an ocean bottom..Those critters and plants aren't there.
You’d have to dig a fair way to find it given how much sand n stuff woulda accumulated since
Skeletons of marine life have been found in the desert, even that of a large whale
How a is It ?? Please Explain , In EGYPT, As In So, Many Other Megalitic/ PreAntideluvian Sites... The Oldest Quote Native Occupping Cultures, Can Not Come a close To Their Supposed Contemperaneous Rev3nt Ancestors, Precision, Size Weight And Purpose(Debated Thus)😮
Every monument on this planet is oriented to Sirius and I mean every monument on the planet is and are oriented to Sirius
'Don 't forget my dog fixed and consequent'
Billy Carson? I'm out.
In the map at the beginning, Israel should be Palestine. Get it right, Gaia.
Gaia equals National inquire
Why do you put BCE? Are you ashamed of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ? Or are you just folding under the pressure of the principalities and entities of this realm?
He’s yours not everyone’s and when you come to terms with that you will become more relevant in comment sections about different POV’s
Grow up
Since god, little g, And the "SUN" of god, little g Are Only Real Inside The Thoroughly Programmed From Early Childhood By Faux religions $heep-le's Orbs, Then, So-Called god, little g, And the "SUN" of god, little g, And allah, little a, And $atan, little s, aka the devil, little d, And the lord, little l Do Not Unfortunately Exist . . . Ouch . . .
Kindly Go Away, Thoroughly Programed $heep-le . . .
BCE= before common era.... AD = the year of our Lord
Are you stupid?
You pretend to be a Christian then you should understand to act Christlike and don’t criticize the fact that not everybody worships delusional saviors to overcome their fear of death
A lot of racism here on the low how about mentioning Robert buvalls black genesis book
Why his book gotta be black? Racist!!
Don't know the book, not sure where you're finding racism here. Do you mean that much later in time, maybe from first through third dynasties, many of the portrayed, and therefore presumed important, Egyptians had negroid features? Yep, they sure did. What we can conclude is that there wasn't so much racial prejudice going around in those days. Beautiful looking people, dark in colour, were coming down the Nile from places in Africa and finding welcome in lower Egypt, intermarrying at will. Things pre-Christian seemed so much better.
No E in BC
Before Current Era.. takes out the religious reference
zep tepe is the time when Saturn was 0ur sun and humanity was living his real ' golden Age ' in c0mpany 0f the ''' G0ds""