OK GUYS STOP SAYING I MADE 180FPS GHLF DID AND I MADE THIS TO JUST CAMPARE THEM BUT Y'ALL JUST KEEP HATING AND HATING OVER 2 SIMPLE ANIMATION THAT ARE COMPARING THE FPS AO Y'ALL NEED TO STOP (srry for this but have gud day and ty for I think it's 272 likes?) edit: blud it ain't ghlf it's actually Gh h my bad bro also thanks for all the likes it makes my day
at first glance it’s difficult to notice something, but after you pause, and you catch a couple of glitched frames - the brain itself catches the damned moments in real time •-• this can really be an eyesore
18 fps: has less smear frames and is a little bit like water, overall looks like a normal cartoon. 180 fps: lots of smears, looks like water and animation looks like 30 fps on VERY VERY VERY MUCH steroids, overall just water if it was an animation.
@@nrgxursion8498i think there were a lot of people who noticed it, but either didn’t know what about it was so off or didn’t know how harmful it can be to animation.
The thing I find sad about this, is that i've seen people who actually made the effort to reanimate some scenes in a higher Frame Rate get hate for it, because the viewers thought it was AI Interpolation, even though you could clearly see that it wasn't. Seeing Noodles video has led some people to randomly hate on any animation they see, where it says that it's in a higher Frame rate than it originally was.
i saw a video on this yesterday, where people use AI to make someones animation smoother but it ends up just making the smear frames and others look like garbage and look like a blurry mess
The problem is, it *doesn't*! The AI that is used for these videos is trained for real life footage, real footage doesn't have smear frames! It's not smear frames that the AI generates, it's just bad generation because the AI doesn't really understand animations.@@madsyndromne
18fps provides a more satisfying transition to things than something overly smooth. it can add an aspect of exaggeration, cartoony and comedic effect you cant gain with something so excessively smooth.
It Cant Just Be Me Who Sees No Difference 💀 [Its Really Good, the skull is not a hate sign, that just my reaction to see everyone seeing a difference but me] 😂
The reason is because fonts character movements and transitions become blurred obscured or re-drawn in a weird way to the point where it may become visually unappealing to the viewer or audience watching.
The point is, interpolation is just a term for calculating a value that's derived from other known values. Video interpolation is just one form of interpolation, and it's not really good.. You can't know what's supposed to be between two images from just the images alone. You can guess, but you can't know.
If artwork is animated at a certain fps, it was chosen for that reason. To make it pop more, or to just give it a certain quality. If you just smooth it over with ai or such to make it "ULTRA SMOOTH!!!1", you lose the intentions. That being said- the top just has a better feel to it.
exactly! an animation made by putting another into a program to smooth it out will obviously never look as good as one where each frame was drawn by a human!
@@davemiller638 and why does it not work like that?? Its smoother ut flows better. Do you prefer looking at a powerpoint presentation or an actual animation?
I can't imagine how not a single rеtаrd here understands that TH-cam does not support >60fps. Not to say that unless you're on a semi-high-end gaming monitor it will also be limited to 60hz (meaning it physically can't refresh the image faster than 60 times a second). The final blow is the fact that SHORTS ARE CAPPED BY TH-cam AT 30 FPS. 60 is available only for full vids 1080p and above. Yall are looking at a ≈20 fps and a ≈30fps clips and hallucinating shit that physically can't be there. Be ashamed ot yourselves. Whenever will be the next time you find the gall to think you a are not an untter gullible moron and can trust yourself to form an opinion, remember this video
If you’re on a phone I don’t think they can go past 60fps because they don’t make small screens that good and I believe TH-cam video compression limits all videos to 60 fps as well that’s why when you go to select image quality it says 4k 60fps so either way y’all are all impressed by how 60fps is good enough for everyone
This seems like one of those animations we would've seen when we were younger and would call nostalgia years later. It has a newgrounds and flash game style
18 feels smoother than 180 because the arcs and motion were actually intended for that framerate meanwhile the interpolation makes the motion feel just ever so slightly off, allbe there more frames.
there definitely is lol by quite a lot TH-cam shorts max out at 30fps so we're viewing effectively 30fps in the bottom animation we can visibly see 18fps as well Good for you (I think????) if you don't notice but it's a very stark difference@@gorfousenpai4860
Yeah, the bottom one feels more like...well, my immediate thought was that weird live action Fairly Odd Parents reboot, particularly the animated characters
@@bluedeluge5961 yes. No animator would ever draw at 180 fps. Most of them aren't even paid enough for 24 fps. But @lemonpringlesdoodles said the truth. If this was 180 fps, but done by a real animator, instead of using a computer generated interpolation, the bottom would look better than what it is now. The increase in fps is not the problem, the problem is how bad it looks when done by a computer.
@@S0ug0 perhaps but the point is it's a massive case of wasted effort, like yes if you individually cut every hair on someone's head instead of using an electric razor, it might look marginally better, but there's a reason no one does that. We don't need 180fps animations, "more fps = better" is a silly thought that people who don't understand animation have.
interpolation doesnt know how animation works, and is not a human. a human know how to make things look more lively, which is something that cannot really be shown to AI@@Konomi_io
interpolation software doesnt work well on animation cause its made for live action, and when used in animation it gives everything weird looking smears on the in-between frames, the original 18FPS looks far better
For those who don't know, when people give animations like these more frames they use basically a form of AI to estimate what should be there in the in-between frames. Because of this individual frames can look super wonky which is why it looks "too smooth" and not quite right. Things get stretched out, innacurate, and disproportional
Bonus is that interpolated video doesn't take into account the timing of an animation and linearly interpolates between frames. What this means is that if we think of frames like points on a curve where their height and distance determines how far along it is in a motion then we can still see the form of the curved line however if we draw linear lines between the points we can still make out the form of the curve, it's just more jagged and pollygonal which in animation can make it look like a robot gear shifting between speeds instead of like a smooth ease in and ease out
Actually the reason why it looks so terrible is because the interpolation program most idiots use is meant for live action footage, so it doesn’t know how to work with animation. To put it simply, they're putting a salad in a deep fryer, the plastic bowl and all.
Aimkid's animations look so smooth even when the frame rate is lower than what people usually use (24), so there's a lot of ingenuity put into each frame. don't do this to aimkid :C
The bottom one has smudges everywhere, it looks terrible. Ppl need to stop "improving animations" by making it 60fps (forgot the name of what its called) it always makes em look like ass
A fact I can’t ever express enough: more FPS does NOT make anything better. Low FPS gives a film/animation character rather than being smooth and quite blatantly boring. That’s why Sony Animations is actually utilizing that and it SUCCEEDED. I DONT GET WHY PEOPLE THINK THIS. More FPS ≠ BETTER ANIMATION. It just looks shitty, especially when done this way.
better animation is entirely dependent on how good the actual animation is, not the frames. whenever they add more frames then it originally had it just looks slimy imo
@@amogussus21your house has been targeted with the intentions of a nuclear airstrike from Brazil. Please remain in your house and do you freak out. Your delivery may arrive in 3 days.
TIPS FOR NEWER ANIMATORS: although more frames seem to work better, it can be too much, please use less frames when animating! plus it’ll take less work :,)
@@frooskapoo3135 personally i use 8!! its honestly different from person to person but my advice is to start around 6 to 15 fps and increase to your liking. (never go over 24 unless you really need to for your stylistic choice!)
No way bro I just watched Noodles video about AI smoothing animations and he mentioned Aimkid so I went over to her channel and just a second later this was slapped right in my face
It’s so weird looking but weirdly less fucky and smeared than other interpolated animation shit. It’s like eating a burger and expecting ass but it’s less ass than you thought but it’s still ass.
@@ItsDylanHarding If you think this is the fault of the screen itself, then I hate to tell you but you have no idea what this technology is. News flash: high framerate doesn't make things blurry. The artifacts and visual mutations that you are seeing come from the AI that artificially added several frames to this video. Televisions do not use AI, they play the raw output of whatever video is being sent to them. In case you didn't know, a lot of films are literally designed to be at a high framerate. Especially video games. However, if you literally want a lower performance screen because you think it would look better, be my guest...you're gonna look pretty stupid though
@@MatheusHenriqueSoaresdeMattos no??? that’s saying a massively popular indie game (watch the original video) is the same as an ai recreation of the game My point is fuck interpolation and fuck you for thinking that
That’s what animators call working on twos, threes, fours, and so on and so forth. It’s when they use the same frame multiple times since no changes need to be made to the next frame. AI poorly manipulates it so instead of being smooth, it’s a smear.
@@FazbearEnit’s not necessarily a smear frame, it’s just a byproduct of the ai trying to interpolate the frames. for example, a smear by a human animator would look more natural because it was made to be smoothed out and a smear by ai would look weird and out of place because the frames around it were not made to be smoothed out (and the general condition that ai created frames look weird)
@@AlfieGee14 Interpolation is ass. Can you not see the muddy blurs during movement? It destroys the soul of the animation and the creator's work. Even if somebody painstakingly animated it at 180 fps it would still look too... what's the word... official? Like a big corporation made it, not just a guy, which ruins it. 2D Animation is better in lower frames and 3D Animation/Video Games are usually better in higher frames.
allow me to explain why this is not something you should do, this is called interpolation, its a thing in some software that allows you to artificially create frames in-between using generative fill. sounds good, but it's not meant for animation, it's designed for live action. the result is jarring animation with invisible blur that makes some people feel sick when watching it too long. (was not aware this would blow up, but oh well.)
She has made many masterpieces, and she hasn’t disappeared she just doesn’t upload often. Animation takes days and hours to create and finish. Especially animation in her style
@@smarkmalark yeah, her newest animation is 8 months old, but guess what? the one before that is 2 years ago! she'll make a new animation eventually, and no matter what it is I will cherish every second of it on repeat
@@tzargI mean the newest animation was a quarter of something hand drawn, that means ON PAPER, geez that must have took who knows how long Add on that they animate on 18 frames (verr hard!) and you realize why it took so long lol
18fps is better because it was drawn with that frame rate in mind. when animating, one of the key principles is timing. if it's lower frames, the movements need to be more exaggerated in order to keep its speed. with extra frames it ruins that, making it look off and slightly uncanny, as seen here.
the shitty thing about animation interpolation is that the reason it looks shit obviously is because it goes against the intentions of the artist, it’s made specifically at that fps and the interpolation has no knowledge of the timing of frames, it just makes everything move equally fast.
18FPS, and it's not a contest. Sure, Higher FPS = smoother animation, but when you put it in a computer software, it just deep fries certain parts of the original animation. And if there's someone wondering why not make 180FPS in the original animation for the smoother effect. That's 180 separately drawn frames per second. Who is going to draw 180 frames for 1 second.
Just get a computer to run a program that generates the images off of one drawing, like a REG (Random Event Generator.) So you don't need to have creativity or time, AI will do it all. And most modern computers can handle it
It's hardly different, it's just the amount of frames that pass in a second which makes it appear to move more smoothly. Artists cry and make a big deal out of technology designed to artificially raise the framerate of animations, but it looks fine. Most of the people agreeing are artists that are mad for some reason. Not to mention that this technology will only evolve over time and continuously look better.
Interpolation does work with this animation since it doesn't reply much on timing. But applying it to snappy animations like Kanada style animation ruins the flow
@@luvsiix_you're right, it will get better what you're not right about is that there is no difference. look at the knife in the intro. there is an unnecessary blur at the tip of the knife on the second sharpen. It's not a smear frame It is a blatant ruining of the animation. It's a lot puffier, but it adds very unnecessary frames. Our brains fill in the gap between the original 18 frames.
180 fps is like spending hours and hours drawing something on a whiteboard only for Billy to come up to you, punch you in the face, kick you to the ground, beat your kneecaps in with a bat, then smeared the entire drawing into a sloppy mess and tells you he “Fixed your drawing.” as he spits on your face
@@ChameleonboiVR the people who reupload episodes of jjba and call it some shit like "60fps improved version" when it looks like the same thing but slightly scary
@@POINTYPOINTYPOINTYPIN The reason why people hate it is bc animators just get spit in the face whenever they see shit like this, ruins all the hard work the original had put into it
OK let's say you made an animation for let's say 4 months, you're really proud of it and you put it on TH-cam and it's great! Then someone comes along and uses AI to increase the frame rate, and the video does really well for them. Would you be happy with this? I know I definitely wouldnt
This animation (and most 2D animation) does not compliment a high frame rate. You're going to break a LOT of very important fundamental rules of animation if you just add frames to an animation meant for 12-24 fps. This isn't to say more frames is always bad, only that adding frames to an animation made out of far fewer frames by default will never look better. If you want a high fps animation to look good, you have to design the animation from the ground up with 180 fps in mind. Interpolation is not going to help you at all here, so you'd have to do it by hand. That's a ridiculous workload, of course, which is why 12-24 fps is the industry standard.
this is a legitimate problem i keep seeing in media and stuff. a bigger number isn't always better. ai is big, so let's integrate it into art, disregarding the cost of creativity
It may seem smoother tho because I think it might've been made with an ai or something... If you pause in more dynamic moments you can dee glitches typical for ai trying to add more frames for stuff like this
this comment section makes me so happy the original is wayyy better, even with lower frames its better to watch and it looks smoother compared to watching it in 180 frames. 180 fps it just way too janky and the frame rate just doesn't the right frame rate for how the characters move. remember, higher fps doesn't always mean smoother animation 🤓👆
I especially hate it when people do this with anime. It already looks pretty bad with smoother animation, but with the choppier AND higher detail animation like in anime, it looks straight up intolerable
@@wisgarus At this point, those people who put interpolation onto things, they might as well just stick to live action and never watch any animations, any sort.
@@darkeryzz I think it's because people who like 180fps animated things get the repetitive "Higher FPS doesn't mean better" stuff shoved down their throat *every time* they mention a certain video they might like that's like this one
@@EpicMehdiNo shorts are only in the 30fps cap. And the MAX on TH-cam is 60fps. The reason 180fps doesn't look completely terrible is because it's not using as much frames as the original
Friendly advice no matter how low your frames are (Excluding if you're using like 1 frame per second 😂) you can still make an animation consistantly smooth. Aimkid has been studying animation with smaller framerate just to a well extinguished smooth animation
The original by a long shot. Interpolating it just, removes the silly style the of vid went for (and aimkids entire style too) Although, that is the best interpolation i’ve seen so far. It doesn't make the video look like a smudged, blurry mess.
To clarify, there's cases in 3D and material texturing stuff where linear interpolation or LERP is all but entirely necessary for good results. But as far as using it to add frames to 2D stuff where there's not a constant frame of reference with location data like a 3D object, it doesn't know what it's actually doing, so there's no intention. You're better off biting the bullet and doing it yourself
@@givlupi2686Having a take that's often stated (for a very legitimate reason) doesn't mean you're copying an opinion. it's a valid and literally better take than liking interpolation on 2d animation that was animated for a different fps value
@@trii0dide Repeating a popular opinion with no reasoning shows you don't understand what you're saying. "Animation equivalent of cat vomit" just means you think it's bad, that's it. If all you have to say about something is that it's bad, you don't have anything to say at all. I don't care what anyone thinks about interpolation, but I can't stand people who parrot what other people say without understanding it themselves.
@@givlupi2686 Absence of an explanation (for which it's likely the same one that is well known) doesn't mean they don't have anything to back it up. They just didn't say it. If someone says they think something sucks and don't elaborate, do you just assume they don't have a reason? You'd ask them for it, but that doesn't mean you just assume "well guess they have no reason" That makes no sense
@@FlayFlay2 I’m allowed to give my opinion and be critical. And my opinion is that this makes the animation look terrible and causes it to blend every other frame from the ai trying to make it smooth. And just to be clear, a human did not make this. This was interpolation by ai. It wasn’t meant to be used for animation and was made for live action. So when its used for an animation that has a low fps as a stylistic choice, it completely removes that style and make it look like a blurry mess. The original animation is amazing and the higher fps makes so much worse.
Yeah the fact that theirs not much difference between the two shows how good of an animator they are and how you can make smooth animation just through technique not just higher framerates
I think the 18 looks just fine, because 180 tries to correct that shaky, chaotic feeling that Aimkid gives their animations. Really cool concept, though!
See, no one actually thinks the "smoother" animations look good. They like knowing the framerate is a multiple of 30. Now I'll admit, sometimes there's an interpolated part of an animation that DOES end up looking pretty good. Which is why interpolation is a tool for creators to use at their own discretion. NOT something basement dwellers covered in Cheeto dust can just toss someone else's entire finished product into and then say "Fixed it!"
Honestly. A lot of the time just because a tool gets misused people think it's something evil or entirely useless. I hate how interpolation is used in the bottom one, but I am sure there are great ways of utilizing it. Hell, some styles of animation like rigged animation or the like already used it. Just not the AI kind and not on the already finished animation like this
@@None-vg1qw just because "its the internet" that wont mean that peopIe can just repost stuff without permission, you forget theres peopIe who creddit others? the internet isnt bad, its some peopIe
The issue with these interpolations is that they often use ai which doesn't handle sudden cuts very well. I think a higher fps count can work really well if done properly, but it's often poorly executed
If the animator intended the animation to be animated at framerate, I wouldn't have a problem with it. However artificial intelligence creating those high frames rates just feels wrong
Ok guys there is this goofy war about 180fps and I just wanna say I did not make it so you should go complain to GHLF about this not me (btw thanks for 59K likes which will become 60K!!)
Own a musket for home defense, since that's what the founding fathers intended. Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.
I can't imagine how not a single rеtаrd here understands that TH-cam does not support >60fps. Not to say that unless you're on a semi-high-end gaming monitor it will also be limited to 60hz (meaning it physically can't refresh the image faster than 60 times a second). The final blow is the fact that SHORTS ARE CAPPED BY TH-cam AT 30 FPS. 60 is available only for full vids 1080p and above. Yall are looking at a ≈20 fps and a ≈30fps clips and hallucinating shit that physically can't be there. Be ashamed ot yourselves. Whenever will be the next time you find the gall to think you a are not an untter gullible moron and can trust yourself to form an opinion, remember this video
@@BEL0V3Dit isnt, interpolation messes up the image, this is an animation and the increase in fps is done using ai that is used for real life, it doesn’t understand what it’s doing so it creates artifacts on the animation
@@Weirdo-y7sthey will understand. Thats like saying a kindergartener doesnt understand calculus. Like yeah it takes time you just dont automatically unlock every single knowledge of this world
@@Weirdo-y7sthe worst parte si My dado keeps telling me i shouldn't learn animación causenit Will benreplace bye AI and it make.me mad everytime he says it.
If anybody here watched Noodle's interpolation video... Yeah... I think it's safe to say keep the top one. The 180 may be a higher framerate, but it sure as heck ain't the best thing to look at. Some moments look smooth sure, but the in-between frames blend one with the other without taking the illustration to effect. It's like the drawing is a solid object, the in-between is that object turning into vapor, then back into a solid object when the next frame hits. Not only that, but 18 out of 180 frames are solid, the rest are filler. Splodges of color fill the screen to ulate the image moving, but ultimately it's just a binary code of connect the dots. And the computer will do that in the most efficient and lifeless way possible. Stick to 18 plz. Thx.
@@fillrim not condoning interpolation in any way, but this one looks surprisingly better than a lot of interpolated animations ive seen if im being completely honest, and i hate that
When you add more frames using ai, it honestly looks like there was less effort given visually, making a lot of the new frames look like the artist didn’t care, even though it was ai generated. That’s why I prefer the old one, which looks clean.
![Nuts [YTP] | A Moana parody](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MnIRAGodAXA/mqdefault.jpg)
![Nuts [YTP] | A Moana parody](/img/tr.png)
OK GUYS STOP SAYING I MADE 180FPS GHLF DID AND I MADE THIS TO JUST CAMPARE THEM BUT Y'ALL JUST KEEP HATING AND HATING OVER 2 SIMPLE ANIMATION THAT ARE COMPARING THE FPS AO Y'ALL NEED TO STOP (srry for this but have gud day and ty for I think it's 272 likes?) edit: blud it ain't ghlf it's actually Gh h my bad bro also thanks for all the likes it makes my day
I'm confused what is this about like it looks the same I'm just confused also 1st
Edit 1 :O I never had this much likes
Edit 2 yessir 104 likes
it has weird smears.
Still don't know
Man people are blind as shit 😭
@@m3gaaa.yea
The top one looks more like a common cartoon which I personally think works vetter, the bottom one is just overly smooth
fax
@@micealhard5444 vetter,vetter,vetter,vetter,vetter,vetter
@@Team_FireGiraffeyep
vetter… *VETTER…* *V E T T E R!??!?!*
I like both but the bottom one still messes with my brain
18 feels natural.
180 feels like a Chernobyl project.
Never have I seen frame rate better described
No 180 fps feels more smooth!
@@Cosmic_Garou7 Unnaturally smooth
@@Cosmic_Garou7180 feels uncanny imo
It’s not that it’s too smooth it’s that it has interpolation artifacts from the ai software they used
The bottom feels like having high sensitivity on your mouse
fr tho
EXACTLY
This sounds crazy out of context, but it makes perfect sense
Real
@@Team_FireGiraffetrue
at first glance it’s difficult to notice something, but after you pause, and you catch a couple of glitched frames - the brain itself catches the damned moments in real time •-• this can really be an eyesore
AI sucks
What is this song fucking named?
My eyes:⬆️⬇️⬆️⬇️⬆️⬇️⬆️⬇️⬆️
Bro same
same, it’s not helping me figure out the difference
18 fps: has less smear frames and is a little bit like water, overall looks like a normal cartoon.
180 fps: lots of smears, looks like water and animation looks like 30 fps on VERY VERY VERY MUCH steroids, overall just water if it was an animation.
Bro same👍
I look at the middle it let’s me see both
18 fps in animation: 🧈
18 fps in games: 🧱
Edit: i love watching people argue in the replies
Edit: we get pass 500 replies somehow
Frrr
people when 180 fps in animation: 😤
people when 180 fps in games: 😀
@@Opinare 180 is good and better
@@AlfieGee14the bottom one looks weird and jittery, because it was made with interpolation software and wasn't made to be 180 fps.
@@TerrificToilet it, is, BETTER.
animators when they see 180 fps : 💀
gamers when they see 18 fps : 💀
related
As both, both of them are so relatable 💀
Can we trade??
Fr bro😂
@@Brownbag5028 Same.
"How many times did you watch?"
"ITS ARLIGHT, ITS ARLIGHT! 😀"
That doesn’t even make sense
@@usernameunderdevelopmentthat’s the joke
Ah yes, Arlight
@@DarnelWxlfwell the joke doesn’t make sense
@@ScarletsWork it’s still a joke
Pc gamers when they realize animations don't need high fps
True😂😂
As a pc gamer I agree
Animations aren't the issue. It's about the game itself. A low frame rate in a game means everything appears choppy and unresponsive.
@@Vintagesonic1 you missed my point
Imagine not having to wish all your favorite games had a resolution slider to get smooth enough framerate to play them (still imagining btw)
I love how Noodle has just singlehandedly killed the trend of using AI interpolation over 2D animation.
Though I still don't get why people didn't notice it at first.
@@nrgxursion8498i think there were a lot of people who noticed it, but either didn’t know what about it was so off or didn’t know how harmful it can be to animation.
I’ve watched that video like 3 times in the past 2 months
good.
The thing I find sad about this, is that i've seen people who actually made the effort to reanimate some scenes in a higher Frame Rate get hate for it, because the viewers thought it was AI Interpolation, even though you could clearly see that it wasn't. Seeing Noodles video has led some people to randomly hate on any animation they see, where it says that it's in a higher Frame rate than it originally was.
...keep it to 18FPS
YES PLEASE 🙏
I cant tell the difference help
me to
I use 12 FPS
But the highest FPS I’ve used is 18 FPS
Es
i saw a video on this yesterday, where people use AI to make someones animation smoother but it ends up just making the smear frames and others look like garbage and look like a blurry mess
Ikr
i beg your pardon
The 180 fps looks smooth at first, then you notice the classic AI blurs
it happens irl tho, motion blur.
@@SassyNymphetI knew it looked familiar 💀
Thank you, your comment talking about two entirely different things should win an award!!!@@SassyNymphet
ai knows smear frames
The problem is, it *doesn't*! The AI that is used for these videos is trained for real life footage, real footage doesn't have smear frames! It's not smear frames that the AI generates, it's just bad generation because the AI doesn't really understand animations.@@madsyndromne
18fps provides a more satisfying transition to things than something overly smooth. it can add an aspect of exaggeration, cartoony and comedic effect you cant gain with something so excessively smooth.
that’s 180fps not 18fp
@@WhoIsThisBuffoonInMyPFP working on 2's and 3's are used for years to exaggerate. 2's and 3's are multiple of the same frame before next one.
@@rustinhaigood I just realized 💀
~~adaptive FPS~~
@@FluffyFoxUwU WAUDAAA HAILLLLLL NO WAAAAYYAYAYAYYYYY 💀
Animation with 18 fps: 😊
Games with 18 fps: 💀
True
Stole
Stolw
you basically stole this comment
Bro wanted the likes
It Cant Just Be Me Who Sees No Difference 💀 [Its Really Good, the skull is not a hate sign, that just my reaction to see everyone seeing a difference but me] 😂
I don’t see a difference either :P
Me neither lol
pause the video a couple times, you'll see the problem
In my opinion I don’t think interpolation should be used in 2d animation
The reason is because fonts character movements and transitions become blurred obscured or re-drawn in a weird way to the point where it may become visually unappealing to the viewer or audience watching.
The point is, interpolation is just a term for calculating a value that's derived from other known values. Video interpolation is just one form of interpolation, and it's not really good.. You can't know what's supposed to be between two images from just the images alone. You can guess, but you can't know.
FINALLY SOMEONE THAT HAS COMMON SENSE 🥲
Well then 90 percent of flash and rigged animation is just gone i guess
@@randomrandle9141 okay ;-;
If artwork is animated at a certain fps, it was chosen for that reason. To make it pop more, or to just give it a certain quality. If you just smooth it over with ai or such to make it "ULTRA SMOOTH!!!1", you lose the intentions.
That being said- the top just has a better feel to it.
exactly! an animation made by putting another into a program to smooth it out will obviously never look as good as one where each frame was drawn by a human!
In your head: better = bad
@@wahzawahzo2949It just doesn't work when the animation isn't fast, you catch my drift?
@@davemiller638 and why does it not work like that?? Its smoother ut flows better. Do you prefer looking at a powerpoint presentation or an actual animation?
@@wahzawahzo2949 You notice artifacting, problems, things like that way better, your mind doesn't care if you think it's smoother, it will see it
180 FPS looks uncomfortably smooth
I can't imagine how not a single rеtаrd here understands that TH-cam does not support >60fps. Not to say that unless you're on a semi-high-end gaming monitor it will also be limited to 60hz (meaning it physically can't refresh the image faster than 60 times a second). The final blow is the fact that SHORTS ARE CAPPED BY TH-cam AT 30 FPS. 60 is available only for full vids 1080p and above. Yall are looking at a ≈20 fps and a ≈30fps clips and hallucinating shit that physically can't be there. Be ashamed ot yourselves. Whenever will be the next time you find the gall to think you a are not an untter gullible moron and can trust yourself to form an opinion, remember this video
180 is wayyy overkill for any kind of animation anyway.
that's the choose of words I was looking for
If you’re on a phone I don’t think they can go past 60fps because they don’t make small screens that good and I believe TH-cam video compression limits all videos to 60 fps as well that’s why when you go to select image quality it says 4k 60fps so either way y’all are all impressed by how 60fps is good enough for everyone
NOT SMOOTH ENOUGH
I personally think that having more frames is better for an animation like this.
This seems like one of those animations we would've seen when we were younger and would call nostalgia years later. It has a newgrounds and flash game style
Wait nvm forget the last line, it doesn't. It just looks like it would be made in the early 2010s
It’s literally so nostalgic for me lmao, I remember watching it when I was like 9
so you were born in 2011 right?...@@Burgerificc
18 feels smoother than 180 because the arcs and motion were actually intended for that framerate meanwhile the interpolation makes the motion feel just ever so slightly off, allbe there more frames.
I like the blur for the saw and funny spin on the 180 otherwise i perfer 18
ARE YOU BLIND
@@Lol-edits-Amkeyword “feels”
@@BearBearYT real
Honestly the original is so good that the ai version looks pretty good too
18fps is better. Smoothing messes up the motion.
frr
Yea
How are you guys comparing anything here ?
There is litterally no differences between the two animations.
@@gorfousenpai4860yes there is
there definitely is lol
by quite a lot
TH-cam shorts max out at 30fps so we're viewing effectively 30fps in the bottom animation
we can visibly see 18fps as well
Good for you (I think????) if you don't notice but it's a very stark difference@@gorfousenpai4860
Both of them look amazing❤
No, bottom one is complete garbage and insulting
@@usernameunderdevelopmentIt's his opinion.
18 frames in an animation like this is always the right way to go.
never interpolation.
Yeah, the bottom one feels more like...well, my immediate thought was that weird live action Fairly Odd Parents reboot, particularly the animated characters
@@damienearl8302ye,bottom is just fucking soap
FINALLY, SOMEONE WHO GETS IT!
@@floweytheflower4499 fake higher FPS looks really bad
ai doesn't have eyes nor can it read the laws of animation so it breaks them
180 isn’t necessarily bad, it just needs to be drawn by a person instead of being interpolated using AI.
you're not gonna pay any animator enough cash to inbetween 180 fps
@@bluedeluge5961 yes. No animator would ever draw at 180 fps. Most of them aren't even paid enough for 24 fps. But @lemonpringlesdoodles said the truth. If this was 180 fps, but done by a real animator, instead of using a computer generated interpolation, the bottom would look better than what it is now. The increase in fps is not the problem, the problem is how bad it looks when done by a computer.
@@S0ug0 perhaps but the point is it's a massive case of wasted effort, like yes if you individually cut every hair on someone's head instead of using an electric razor, it might look marginally better, but there's a reason no one does that. We don't need 180fps animations, "more fps = better" is a silly thought that people who don't understand animation have.
@@S0ug0 give it a few years or so and the ai interpolation will be indistinguishable from if a human did it
interpolation doesnt know how animation works, and is not a human. a human know how to make things look more lively, which is something that cannot really be shown to AI@@Konomi_io
Is it weird that I find the 180 fps animation unconfortably soothing...?
it's 30 fps with motion blur, he lied
interpolation software doesnt work well on animation cause its made for live action, and when used in animation it gives everything weird looking smears on the in-between frames, the original 18FPS looks far better
Smear frames go from funny to just ugly
What's the difference?
somebody watched the noodle videos
No it doesn’t 180 fps is better 😂
@@Jules24122 a bigger number like say, your moms weight in pounds doesn't always mean better and this short is a prime example you outdated lemsip!
For those who don't know, when people give animations like these more frames they use basically a form of AI to estimate what should be there in the in-between frames. Because of this individual frames can look super wonky which is why it looks "too smooth" and not quite right. Things get stretched out, innacurate, and disproportional
The definition of keyframes
Bonus is that interpolated video doesn't take into account the timing of an animation and linearly interpolates between frames.
What this means is that if we think of frames like points on a curve where their height and distance determines how far along it is in a motion then we can still see the form of the curved line however if we draw linear lines between the points we can still make out the form of the curve, it's just more jagged and pollygonal which in animation can make it look like a robot gear shifting between speeds instead of like a smooth ease in and ease out
Actually the reason why it looks so terrible is because the interpolation program most idiots use is meant for live action footage, so it doesn’t know how to work with animation.
To put it simply, they're putting a salad in a deep fryer, the plastic bowl and all.
Theyre pretty much identical
Aimkid's animations look so smooth even when the frame rate is lower than what people usually use (24), so there's a lot of ingenuity put into each frame. don't do this to aimkid :C
Yeah
I don't think they did this to insult her, they were just showing a difference and that higher frame rate =/= better animation
my eyes when watching this: ☝️👆👇👇👈👆👇👆👇☝️☝️👇👆👇
18 fps, because it’s actually intended to look like that, therefore it actually looks, y’know, GOOD
REAL
the bottom is better
@@dumpling3 it’s not, higher framerate doesn’t equal better lil bro
@@FossyPicklesmy opinion
The bottom one has smudges everywhere, it looks terrible. Ppl need to stop "improving animations" by making it 60fps (forgot the name of what its called) it always makes em look like ass
A fact I can’t ever express enough: more FPS does NOT make anything better. Low FPS gives a film/animation character rather than being smooth and quite blatantly boring. That’s why Sony Animations is actually utilizing that and it SUCCEEDED. I DONT GET WHY PEOPLE THINK THIS. More FPS ≠ BETTER ANIMATION. It just looks shitty, especially when done this way.
logic.
better animation is entirely dependent on how good the actual animation is, not the frames. whenever they add more frames then it originally had it just looks slimy imo
@@melia4294 yeah exactly. Better frames can look good but 1: it’s extremely hard to maintain, and 2: honestly just causes animators pain lol
Bro calm down you will get a heart attack for screaming, for example "MORE FPS IS NOT BETTER ANIMATION" just stay chill ok, it's just the internet? 😅
It's such a pleasure playing Counter Strike at 18 fps
POV: A cat realizes it has 9 lifes
i sincerely apologise for what i am going to do. Lives*
@@amogussus21your house has been targeted with the intentions of a nuclear airstrike from Brazil. Please remain in your house and do you freak out. Your delivery may arrive in 3 days.
@@WhoWilliBe as a weird brazilian i love those kinda comments
@SageBozo i live in mars lmao. 2 weeks by, still alive.
@@amogussus21 damn. Must've hit the wrong spot. Gotta destroy the whole planet=)
Easily 18fps AI just makes animation look bad in my opinion
TIPS FOR NEWER ANIMATORS: although more frames seem to work better, it can be too much, please use less frames when animating! plus it’ll take less work :,)
The 180 frames is ai upscaling which breaks all animation timing
The best fps for starters is either 12, 15, or 20 fps.
is 8fps good@@frooskapoo3135
@@frooskapoo313560 or 24
@@frooskapoo3135 personally i use 8!! its honestly different from person to person but my advice is to start around 6 to 15 fps and increase to your liking. (never go over 24 unless you really need to for your stylistic choice!)
No way bro I just watched Noodles video about AI smoothing animations and he mentioned Aimkid so I went over to her channel and just a second later this was slapped right in my face
It’s so weird looking but weirdly less fucky and smeared than other interpolated animation shit. It’s like eating a burger and expecting ass but it’s less ass than you thought but it’s still ass.
"I am going to heart this comment!"
@@noobier9790oh yeahhh B)
ayo fellow noodle viewer
@@pul53ghayo
The 180 fps version looks like a tv when you look at it in the market.
Edit: how did i get 1k likes with this simple comment?
That's a great observation, TV's in stores always play videos at their max refresh rate in order to show off their maximum potential
@@luvsiix_ yay I love the potential of modern TVs to arbitrarily smudge quality animation with shitty interpolation bc “big number more gooder”
@@ItsDylanHarding If you think this is the fault of the screen itself, then I hate to tell you but you have no idea what this technology is. News flash: high framerate doesn't make things blurry. The artifacts and visual mutations that you are seeing come from the AI that artificially added several frames to this video. Televisions do not use AI, they play the raw output of whatever video is being sent to them. In case you didn't know, a lot of films are literally designed to be at a high framerate. Especially video games. However, if you literally want a lower performance screen because you think it would look better, be my guest...you're gonna look pretty stupid though
I love how they all go quiet after simply explaining how a TV works
@@luvsiix_ woah this isnt a school project
18 fps: cartoony
180 fps: realistic/humanistic movements
noodle has taught us a lot, we need to give him the recognition and credit he deserves for putting us in our place
Agreed
we love noodle, and based on his lesson, fuck higher fps in animation 💯
@@l.m.l8598you mean ai generated higher fps? But yeah I agree with you!
Honestly, the 180 fps just looks gross and unfinished
Noodle best man
Let's.. keep it in 18 fps.
Its same thing
@@MatheusHenriqueSoaresdeMattosits rly janky in 180 tho, and 180 is weird asf
@@MatheusHenriqueSoaresdeMattos no???
that’s saying a massively popular indie game (watch the original video) is the same as an ai recreation of the game
My point is fuck interpolation and fuck you for thinking that
@@E..-_frrr
whenever the 180 fps animation does the slightest movement, there’s this really weird smear that appears for every frame of the movement
That’s what animators call working on twos, threes, fours, and so on and so forth. It’s when they use the same frame multiple times since no changes need to be made to the next frame. AI poorly manipulates it so instead of being smooth, it’s a smear.
its called smear frame i think
@@FazbearEnit’s not necessarily a smear frame, it’s just a byproduct of the ai trying to interpolate the frames. for example, a smear by a human animator would look more natural because it was made to be smoothed out and a smear by ai would look weird and out of place because the frames around it were not made to be smoothed out (and the general condition that ai created frames look weird)
Oh hi Sword
fr
the kitchen tile teeth always get me, like it's so preppy
18 FPS:NORMAL
180 FPS:SOAP
And it’s not like regular soap it’s like really wet and slippery soap like in those memes about dropping the soap in prison
why r u yelling
@@prasadnayrana0014because it's a comment section and people can do anything
NOOOOOOOO! SOAP!
soap = sm- actually, I’m done. 18 and 180 sucks.
18 FPS Gang
👇
Not me 180 fps is better
@@AlfieGee14in games? yes, in animations? not unless you made it specifically for 180fps
@@AlfieGee14 Interpolation is ass. Can you not see the muddy blurs during movement? It destroys the soul of the animation and the creator's work. Even if somebody painstakingly animated it at 180 fps it would still look too... what's the word... official? Like a big corporation made it, not just a guy, which ruins it. 2D Animation is better in lower frames and 3D Animation/Video Games are usually better in higher frames.
@@pillowcaseee180 fps is smooth tho
broski wants likes 😭
allow me to explain why this is not something you should do, this is called interpolation, its a thing in some software that allows you to artificially create frames in-between using generative fill. sounds good, but it's not meant for animation, it's designed for live action. the result is jarring animation with invisible blur that makes some people feel sick when watching it too long.
(was not aware this would blow up, but oh well.)
ik but i did not make the 180fps one
@@Team_FireGiraffeyes, a computer made it instead, and that makes it even worse
YES
sometimes you can pull it iff and it looks good, other times... no
Then there's companies with employees which interpolate for you, but not adding bs, like actual people touching up on your animation
The bottom one is what happens when your forget smear frames exist 💀
Aimkid is that one animator that just make a absolute fucking masterpiece and just disappears.
She has made many masterpieces, and she hasn’t disappeared she just doesn’t upload often. Animation takes days and hours to create and finish. Especially animation in her style
@@smarkmalark yeah, her newest animation is 8 months old, but guess what? the one before that is 2 years ago! she'll make a new animation eventually, and no matter what it is I will cherish every second of it on repeat
@@tzargI mean the newest animation was a quarter of something hand drawn, that means ON PAPER, geez that must have took who knows how long
Add on that they animate on 18 frames (verr hard!) and you realize why it took so long lol
@@tzarg there you are again!
She is going through some stuff btw
Gamers if they use 180fps
Animators if they use 18-20fps:
How does it feel to have a pc?
18fps is better because it was drawn with that frame rate in mind. when animating, one of the key principles is timing. if it's lower frames, the movements need to be more exaggerated in order to keep its speed. with extra frames it ruins that, making it look off and slightly uncanny, as seen here.
you learn something everyday i guess, thank you random internet user for teaching me something new!
This is the true
you teached me something new
the shitty thing about animation interpolation is that the reason it looks shit obviously is because it goes against the intentions of the artist, it’s made specifically at that fps and the interpolation has no knowledge of the timing of frames, it just makes everything move equally fast.
i think itd look better if it was interpolated now with the new softwares
The bottom one feels
l i q u i d y
Am agree
more like deep fried and cloudy
This liquid gotta be acid
18FPS, and it's not a contest. Sure, Higher FPS = smoother animation, but when you put it in a computer software, it just deep fries certain parts of the original animation. And if there's someone wondering why not make 180FPS in the original animation for the smoother effect. That's 180 separately drawn frames per second. Who is going to draw 180 frames for 1 second.
it would take literally every animator to do it
@@gregjohns4360they would reject to work for you then... except if you pay them unimaginably high prices
who? youre underestimating peoples patience
Just get a computer to run a program that generates the images off of one drawing, like a REG (Random Event Generator.) So you don't need to have creativity or time, AI will do it all. And most modern computers can handle it
I’d like to say I do animation at 30 fps it’s hell so 180 I don’t know what person would ever wanna do that
Everyone: "18 FpS lOoKs WaY bEtTeR"
Me: trying to find a difference
True
It's hardly different, it's just the amount of frames that pass in a second which makes it appear to move more smoothly. Artists cry and make a big deal out of technology designed to artificially raise the framerate of animations, but it looks fine. Most of the people agreeing are artists that are mad for some reason. Not to mention that this technology will only evolve over time and continuously look better.
Interpolation does work with this animation since it doesn't reply much on timing.
But applying it to snappy animations like Kanada style animation ruins the flow
@@luvsiix_you're right, it will get better
what you're not right about is that there is no difference.
look at the knife in the intro. there is an unnecessary blur at the tip of the knife on the second sharpen. It's not a smear frame It is a blatant ruining of the animation. It's a lot puffier, but it adds very unnecessary frames. Our brains fill in the gap between the original 18 frames.
why are you guys saying stuff as long as the bible dude
The biggest difference to me is the 180 looks like it has motion blur applied to it
Btw guys what you’re seeing on the bottom isn’t 180FPS, TH-cam won’t show that
The phone either
@@vit.2882 true, refresh rate also matters
@@ButterFromDiscord It's animated in 180fps
@@bloxcollection_offical yeah but you can’t see that through TH-cam
@ButterFromDiscord you cant see it through yt, but what you can see is the ugly blurring of the ai trying to fill in the gaps
180 fps is like spending hours and hours drawing something on a whiteboard only for Billy to come up to you, punch you in the face, kick you to the ground, beat your kneecaps in with a bat, then smeared the entire drawing into a sloppy mess and tells you he “Fixed your drawing.” as he spits on your face
So true
Who’s billy?
@@ChameleonboiVRyour high school bully who now sells Viagra under the Brooklyn Bridge
pretty much
@@ChameleonboiVR the people who reupload episodes of jjba and call it some shit like "60fps improved version" when it looks like the same thing but slightly scary
"Guys, I used AI, doesn't it look so good?"
I honestly hate when people do that, it looks so weird and bad
*makes AI*
“OMG I HATE THIS STUPID AI THIS IS THE WORST THING EVER IMAGINE LIKING AI SO EWW”
@@POINTYPOINTYPOINTYPIN The reason why people hate it is bc animators just get spit in the face whenever they see shit like this, ruins all the hard work the original had put into it
@@therealmiriasuhow
OK let's say you made an animation for let's say 4 months, you're really proud of it and you put it on TH-cam and it's great! Then someone comes along and uses AI to increase the frame rate, and the video does really well for them. Would you be happy with this?
I know I definitely wouldnt
@@optikulus thank you! Finally someone that thinks before they just spout nonsense
This animation brings back animations
Text book example of an animation's weight getting destroyed by interpolation
This animation (and most 2D animation) does not compliment a high frame rate. You're going to break a LOT of very important fundamental rules of animation if you just add frames to an animation meant for 12-24 fps.
This isn't to say more frames is always bad, only that adding frames to an animation made out of far fewer frames by default will never look better.
If you want a high fps animation to look good, you have to design the animation from the ground up with 180 fps in mind. Interpolation is not going to help you at all here, so you'd have to do it by hand. That's a ridiculous workload, of course, which is why 12-24 fps is the industry standard.
yeah and it all looks better how it is even for 3D
He didn’t even make this animation though, it’s not his.
this is a legitimate problem i keep seeing in media and stuff. a bigger number isn't always better. ai is big, so let's integrate it into art, disregarding the cost of creativity
Animation has rules? Since when does animation need rules and why?
@@DrillThrill it has principles for animations to look better and flowy
Really it’s 18 vs 30 because yt shorts is on 30fps frame limit
that aint 30 fps
My dude we're on YT shorts. The 12 year olds here won't know what you mean by that...
They think there is actually a difference between the two clips.
Well there is a bit of delay so at least the 12 year olds know it’s more than 18@@Unga_Bunga
It is actually 180 since the creator uses frame blending to blend them into 30.
It may seem smoother tho because I think it might've been made with an ai or something... If you pause in more dynamic moments you can dee glitches typical for ai trying to add more frames for stuff like this
Whichever one allows me to input more actions per frames, per second.
this comment section makes me so happy
the original is wayyy better, even with lower frames its better to watch and it looks smoother compared to watching it in 180 frames. 180 fps it just way too janky and the frame rate just doesn't the right frame rate for how the characters move.
remember, higher fps doesn't always mean smoother animation 🤓👆
Ikr I saw a video like this and commented “this is so lazy becuase ai bots and it doesn’t look good” and like 50 people started tearing my throat out
Part of it is that they’re also kinda just stealing someone’s content and throwing it in an ai which only cares to bring point a to point b
I especially hate it when people do this with anime.
It already looks pretty bad with smoother animation, but with the choppier AND higher detail animation like in anime, it looks straight up intolerable
@@wisgarus At this point, those people who put interpolation onto things, they might as well just stick to live action and never watch any animations, any sort.
@@darkeryzz I think it's because people who like 180fps animated things get the repetitive "Higher FPS doesn't mean better" stuff shoved down their throat *every time* they mention a certain video they might like that's like this one
Blud forgot TH-cam shorts only render 30 FPS 😭🙏🏽
Nah that's your phone
They can only render 60fps same with every single youtube video
@@EpicMehdiNo shorts are only in the 30fps cap. And the MAX on TH-cam is 60fps.
The reason 180fps doesn't look completely terrible is because it's not using as much frames as the original
Frames per second for the base animation blud R/Woosh.
@@VampKink12r/foundthemobiluser
Friendly advice no matter how low your frames are (Excluding if you're using like 1 frame per second 😂) you can still make an animation consistantly smooth. Aimkid has been studying animation with smaller framerate just to a well extinguished smooth animation
12 is like the limit before it looks too choppy
Aimkid is a self-taught animator but I'm not going to call you stupid cus that would be rude :)
Okay
2 fps
@@leavesyap3428you can study stuff even if you're not in school... That's how you'd learn to animate in the first place...
18 fps inst that low tho, like 12 is kinda normal and I would say 8fps to actully be slow
18 fps in the Quantum World: 💀
180 fps in the Quantum World: 😇
The funniest thing is that TH-cam (and shorts by proxy) can't show more than 60 fps
The funnier thing is that my phone is unable to show more than 17fps
True
@@moaazwali2367lol but that sad cuz vids might be rlly weird to watch with low fps
@@Team_FireGiraffe yeah cause low fps = unwatchable right? Right? Fucking.
thats because we cant even process any fps higher than 60 😂
edit: no offense, but you guys need to learn more about humans
The original by a long shot. Interpolating it just, removes the silly style the of vid went for (and aimkids entire style too)
Although, that is the best interpolation i’ve seen so far. It doesn't make the video look like a smudged, blurry mess.
you re blind if you didnt find mistakes and blur, whose were found from 1st and 2nd watch
@@sfed_bro I saw them, but it was relatively slightly higher quality than the other Interps.
I think interpolation should really be used to improve the framerate of a slow mo footage.
OMG HUNTER PFP
@@maonyanoooOMGG 🤩
18 fps by a long shot its just iconic from aimkid
W-w.. WHERES THE BLOOD?!!!
Interpolation is the animation equivalent of cat vomit.
To clarify, there's cases in 3D and material texturing stuff where linear interpolation or LERP is all but entirely necessary for good results. But as far as using it to add frames to 2D stuff where there's not a constant frame of reference with location data like a 3D object, it doesn't know what it's actually doing, so there's no intention. You're better off biting the bullet and doing it yourself
Stop parroting other people's opinions
@@givlupi2686Having a take that's often stated (for a very legitimate reason) doesn't mean you're copying an opinion. it's a valid and literally better take than liking interpolation on 2d animation that was animated for a different fps value
@@trii0dide Repeating a popular opinion with no reasoning shows you don't understand what you're saying. "Animation equivalent of cat vomit" just means you think it's bad, that's it. If all you have to say about something is that it's bad, you don't have anything to say at all. I don't care what anyone thinks about interpolation, but I can't stand people who parrot what other people say without understanding it themselves.
@@givlupi2686 Absence of an explanation (for which it's likely the same one that is well known) doesn't mean they don't have anything to back it up. They just didn't say it. If someone says they think something sucks and don't elaborate, do you just assume they don't have a reason? You'd ask them for it, but that doesn't mean you just assume "well guess they have no reason" That makes no sense
Do Not defy aimkids artistic genius by bumping up the frames, her 18fps style is divine
once she finds out about this, this person is gonna explode
i prefer 30 FPS honestly
her*
@@KINKObun yeah, I kinda wrote it on auto, just fixed it, thx for the reminder
INTERPOLATION IS WORSE GANG! ORIGINAL ALWAYS BETTER
Wow really love how to it completely removes character and charm from a great animation
If u don't like it, don't complain, and leave, all they did was make the animation smoother and asked for a opinion, not a hate comment
@@FlayFlay2 I’m allowed to give my opinion and be critical. And my opinion is that this makes the animation look terrible and causes it to blend every other frame from the ai trying to make it smooth. And just to be clear, a human did not make this. This was interpolation by ai. It wasn’t meant to be used for animation and was made for live action. So when its used for an animation that has a low fps as a stylistic choice, it completely removes that style and make it look like a blurry mess. The original animation is amazing and the higher fps makes so much worse.
@@itsrammylolpausewhen the goober is about to be slice by a knife at around 14 seconds
@@FlayFlay2this is an opinion
Well you were just being very rude..@@itsrammylol
That smile just made me think of Totoro
I beg of you, do not mess with Aimkid’s stuff. It’s impressive how smooth they manage to get animation out of 18 fps.
Yeah the fact that theirs not much difference between the two shows how good of an animator they are and how you can make smooth animation just through technique not just higher framerates
I think the 18 looks just fine, because 180 tries to correct that shaky, chaotic feeling that Aimkid gives their animations. Really cool concept, though!
The 180fps one looks like it’s got vaseline smothered on it
Shorts only shows up to 30 fps
Thaaaaats what interpolating animation does for ya!
I like both ngl
@@AdreamAA i know
@@zyaxyl ok have your opinion
Let's be honest, no animation is better with ai interpolation and the original animation is smooth enough
See, no one actually thinks the "smoother" animations look good. They like knowing the framerate is a multiple of 30.
Now I'll admit, sometimes there's an interpolated part of an animation that DOES end up looking pretty good. Which is why interpolation is a tool for creators to use at their own discretion. NOT something basement dwellers covered in Cheeto dust can just toss someone else's entire finished product into and then say "Fixed it!"
Honestly. A lot of the time just because a tool gets misused people think it's something evil or entirely useless.
I hate how interpolation is used in the bottom one, but I am sure there are great ways of utilizing it.
Hell, some styles of animation like rigged animation or the like already used it. Just not the AI kind and not on the already finished animation like this
STOP👏MAKING👏OTHER👏ANIMATIONS👏HIGHER👏FPS👏IT👏HAS👏NO👏DAMN👏POINT
Edit : holy shit I posted this as a joke what the fuck happened
Bro why do some of y'all use these clapping emojis between each word 💀 like I ain't tryna look at all that
fr tho
You sound black
@@MCDTortlehating 👏 pineapple 👏 pizza 👏 is 👏 not 👏 a 👏 personality 👏 trait 👏
@@_Scizor.- using clapping emojis between each word and wasting your time isn't cool
18 is just so much snappier, Aimkid has great timing!
great is an understatement, the timing is so masterclass it looks 24fps
I think 18fps is better because it has that real cartoon vibe. The 180fps one just looks like an AI made it
really hope the person asked the animator before interpolating their animation
they didn’t , no animator would say yes to having their animation turned into a mess like this
"really hope the person asked the animator before interpolating their animation" 🤓👆
It's the internet lil bro, people are going to repost things.
@@None-vg1qw i mean yeah but it'd still be good to do so
@@None-vg1qw just because "its the internet" that wont mean that peopIe can just repost stuff without permission, you forget theres peopIe who creddit others? the internet isnt bad, its some peopIe
@@trashpandaRakuhe's only saying that because he does this kinda shit
The issue with these interpolations is that they often use ai which doesn't handle sudden cuts very well. I think a higher fps count can work really well if done properly, but it's often poorly executed
If the animator intended the animation to be animated at framerate, I wouldn't have a problem with it. However artificial intelligence creating those high frames rates just feels wrong
Dear Lord, it's smudging together
Faster doesn’t mean better
Ok guys there is this goofy war about 180fps and I just wanna say I did not make it so you should go complain to GHLF about this not me (btw thanks for 59K likes which will become 60K!!)
Wow, the last time I checked it was 50‘000 didn’t see that.
okay with that guy 1 Day and night sweet heart attack??!!
Own a musket for home defense, since that's what the founding fathers intended. Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.
36min ago
@@THE_USA_182what?
The bottom feels... Too squishy
18 is just perfect
180 is the equivalent of “I know it looks bad but I like it because everyone else does”
I can't imagine how not a single rеtаrd here understands that TH-cam does not support >60fps. Not to say that unless you're on a semi-high-end gaming monitor it will also be limited to 60hz (meaning it physically can't refresh the image faster than 60 times a second). The final blow is the fact that SHORTS ARE CAPPED BY TH-cam AT 30 FPS. 60 is available only for full vids 1080p and above. Yall are looking at a ≈20 fps and a ≈30fps clips and hallucinating shit that physically can't be there. Be ashamed ot yourselves. Whenever will be the next time you find the gall to think you a are not an untter gullible moron and can trust yourself to form an opinion, remember this video
180 is just objectively better
Idk every time I watch this video my eyes are always on the 180 version, it’s just so eye catching to me idk why
@@BEL0V3Dgenerally, yes. But interpolated 180fps is NOT objectively better, that’s what this is.
@@BEL0V3Dit isnt, interpolation messes up the image, this is an animation and the increase in fps is done using ai that is used for real life, it doesn’t understand what it’s doing so it creates artifacts on the animation
Honestly I love 180 fps, cuz, it's so smooth, 18 fps is more cartoonish.
Who else saw the Brutal bloody version and cant unsee it?
@Lavender-kt9oh one Minute Of Silence for you and me and everyone else
Wdym
Oh is it the one that has the title that says death count: 1. If it ain’t either way can you tell me what happened?
Dawg what
The bottom one looks like an AI generated the rest of the frames...
because it is
That's literally what they did
180 fps is an ai tool trying its hardest to add more frames but failing miserably, I mean, seriously?
Me not seeing a damn difference:
Ikr! Ai can’t compare to the actual effort real ppl put into animation, just smth that this kid will never understand:/
@@Weirdo-y7sthey will understand. Thats like saying a kindergartener doesnt understand calculus. Like yeah it takes time you just dont automatically unlock every single knowledge of this world
@@DustedGlitchedBear Alr! I’ll give them the time to understand the incompetence of ai, hopefully they’ll improve for the better ^^
@@Weirdo-y7sthe worst parte si My dado keeps telling me i shouldn't learn animación causenit Will benreplace bye AI and it make.me mad everytime he says it.
Changed my view on this, hate higher FPS, I now realise artists have their frame-rate set for that style for certain reasons, 18 is better.
If anybody here watched Noodle's interpolation video...
Yeah...
I think it's safe to say keep the top one.
The 180 may be a higher framerate, but it sure as heck ain't the best thing to look at.
Some moments look smooth sure, but the in-between frames blend one with the other without taking the illustration to effect.
It's like the drawing is a solid object, the in-between is that object turning into vapor, then back into a solid object when the next frame hits.
Not only that, but 18 out of 180 frames are solid, the rest are filler. Splodges of color fill the screen to ulate the image moving, but ultimately it's just a binary code of connect the dots. And the computer will do that in the most efficient and lifeless way possible.
Stick to 18 plz. Thx.
was abt to reference the same video lol. the interpolation looks horrible tbh
@@fillrim not condoning interpolation in any way, but this one looks surprisingly better than a lot of interpolated animations ive seen if im being completely honest, and i hate that
the 180 fps should be smoother, but I am so familiar with 18 that 18 looks better quality. props to aimkid 👍
It’s cuz yt is limited to 60
@@Fm7b5_ no, it’s just to me it feels weird for some reason so it feels less smooth.
@@inkbendy710 oh
When you add more frames using ai, it honestly looks like there was less effort given visually, making a lot of the new frames look like the artist didn’t care, even though it was ai generated. That’s why I prefer the old one, which looks clean.
Also TH-cam’s compression making it 30 fps amplifies the issue, as now the bad frames are amplified
I dont think there's much difference, but love the animation