A subtile thing most reviewers have missed: the new camera location on the 16 and 16 plus… they now do spacial photo and video, and the pro models now do spacial audio as well….this is a sign that a consumer model is in fact comming. The future of spacial video is going to be a big thing…
Thanks for sharing these infos to us. I‘m from Germany and recording in 3D since more than a decade now. But immersive video is the next level for me and content created in a way like the Apple videos will be the future for movies and sport events. But I also want a solution below the blackmagic professional equipment to support ambitious hobby movie creators. So let‘s See what the future will bring…
The big problem with any dual fish eye is that you capturing 2 small circles side by side on a 3x2 sensor and you are using a woefully tiny fraction of the sensor. Then, you’re stretching those tiny circles into a 180° sphere.
1:08 I’d like to have heard what you considered “meh” about them before moving on. I suspect it has to do with the shorter lens separation and the drop-off of 3D effects - especially based on the hardware I assume is your standard, based on the thumbnail.
For me the footage suffers from the high iso noise that you see on phone footage, you cant record spatial with a set shutter speed or ISO The footage captured on an iPhone doesn’t hold up against a mirrorless camera or the dedicated immersive cameras that have been used Its still cool tho to see moments captured in spatial on an iPhone, but for the $3500 price tag I want the best looking content available 😂
@@TrentonsTech Edited, once I got a reminder of the video I had to pause… Even though I haven’t finished the video yet, I still think that overall, your standards are much higher than mine - not that I wouldn’t love to have the kind of video and photo quality you seem to be used to. That said, I love my AVP.
Good rap up on what people can do with these spatial camera systems. I too await the Blackmagic 17k camera ($31,000-out-Nov.) reviews & its stereoscopic lens camera release.
8:23 100% FALSE. 16K = FOUR times the resolution of 8K just like 8K = FOUR times the resolution of 4K. 16:9 16K = 15360 x 8640 aka 132,710,400 pixels. 16:9 8K = 7680 x 4320 aka 33,177,600 pixels. 16:9 4K = 3840 x 2160 aka 8,294,400 pixels.
Canon hasn’t announced any VR lens support for the R3, just the R7 with the new lenses. It would be nice if there were more cameras supported from Canon
I’m not understanding why the R5 wouldn’t be supported when it’s a better camera than the R7. I have the R5, and I’m not looking forward to buying a less impressive camera
The R5 should work but I believe its capped at 8k 30 instead of 8K 60. So far the Canon R5C and the R5 Mark 2 can do 8k 60p. But we shall see, Canon and Apple could find a way to support more cameras later on
A subtile thing most reviewers have missed: the new camera location on the 16 and 16 plus… they now do spacial photo and video, and the pro models now do spacial audio as well….this is a sign that a consumer model is in fact comming. The future of spacial video is going to be a big thing…
Thanks for sharing these infos to us. I‘m from Germany and recording in 3D since more than a decade now. But immersive video is the next level for me and content created in a way like the Apple videos will be the future for movies and sport events. But I also want a solution below the blackmagic professional equipment to support ambitious hobby movie creators. So let‘s See what the future will bring…
I agree 100%, Sony please make something for us!!
The big problem with any dual fish eye is that you capturing 2 small circles side by side on a 3x2 sensor and you are using a woefully tiny fraction of the sensor. Then, you’re stretching those tiny circles into a 180° sphere.
Also à Sony shooter and definitely need a spatial lens ahah ❤
Blackmagic URSA Cine Immersive is what I'm excited to buy. 😎👍
I can’t wait to get my hands on the black magic camera
That Blackmagic footage is going to look insane 🔥
1:08 I’d like to have heard what you considered “meh” about them before moving on.
I suspect it has to do with the shorter lens separation and the drop-off of 3D effects - especially based on the hardware I assume is your standard, based on the thumbnail.
For me the footage suffers from the high iso noise that you see on phone footage, you cant record spatial with a set shutter speed or ISO
The footage captured on an iPhone doesn’t hold up against a mirrorless camera or the dedicated immersive cameras that have been used
Its still cool tho to see moments captured in spatial on an iPhone, but for the $3500 price tag I want the best looking content available 😂
@@TrentonsTech Edited, once I got a reminder of the video I had to pause…
Even though I haven’t finished the video yet, I still think that overall, your standards are much higher than mine - not that I wouldn’t love to have the kind of video and photo quality you seem to be used to.
That said, I love my AVP.
Someone needs to build a camera like calf VR but with 2 x MFT Sensors. You need 1 sensor per lense otherwise it is too wasteful.
Good rap up on what people can do with these spatial camera systems. I too await the Blackmagic 17k camera ($31,000-out-Nov.) reviews & its stereoscopic lens camera release.
How is apple the only company to have spatial video on a phone..... for 2 generations now!!
Because no one is interested
A lot of cool information. Thanks!
8:23 100% FALSE.
16K = FOUR times the resolution of 8K just like 8K = FOUR times the resolution of 4K.
16:9 16K = 15360 x 8640 aka 132,710,400 pixels.
16:9 8K = 7680 x 4320 aka 33,177,600 pixels.
16:9 4K = 3840 x 2160 aka 8,294,400 pixels.
Thank you for providing the correct information
Thanks for sharing. Blessings on your day.
Will new VR lenses work on Canon R3 camera?
Canon hasn’t announced any VR lens support for the R3, just the R7 with the new lenses. It would be nice if there were more cameras supported from Canon
@@TrentonsTech canon dual fish eye full frame will work with R6 mk2 & R3
I’m not understanding why the R5 wouldn’t be supported when it’s a better camera than the R7. I have the R5, and I’m not looking forward to buying a less impressive camera
The R5 should work but I believe its capped at 8k 30 instead of 8K 60. So far the Canon R5C and the R5 Mark 2 can do 8k 60p. But we shall see, Canon and Apple could find a way to support more cameras later on
@@TrentonsTech for which viewing devices should they develop this?
Great Video
The apsc
The apsc dual fish eye has a narrower field of view at around 140 degrees
144° Field of View according to the spec sheet
@@TrentonsTech yeah I rounded down but close enough with a feather boarder on it.
Blackmagic beat Canon at its own game. Canon needs to go back to the drawing boards.
What not!
The black magic will cost a million dollars 😂