Fsr ultra performance in 640x480 with frame generation may give astonishing 25fps in 213x160 render resolution with very enjoyable 150ms input lag, you can go further and achieve over 60fps by using 4x lossless scaling, the latency will make the game feel like it was being streamed from the moon but it's smooth!
@@muhammedebrarnazli_1968 theoretically the worst GPU on the planet that "should" run this game is Intel HD 500 iGPU but that's only available in some potato mobile CPUs and the performance should be measured in frames per minute rather than second, any 6th gen and above intel CPU should at least start the game if only the intel shitty drivers will allow them to
Yeah, I was worried seeing first benchmarks but after release actually it runs pretty well, 1080 medium with DLSS Q 70-80 fps is nice. I'm more concerned that games advance too fast compared to budget gpus, with my 2060 I could run any new game in 1080p medium-high even max. Now with 4060 and new games you can't reach 60fps on max without FG. If something won't be done in 6000 rtx series you will need 6070 for high 1080p 60fps+ experience without FG
yes bc cutting edge UE5 games look better on medium than old games on very high. You cant just take medium-high settings of completely different games, made with other engines etc., and compare them with a completely new, cutting edge UE5 title's medium setting. medium isnt just medium. it doesnt mean the same in every game. New games have a way higher baselevel of visual fidelity. Many games still look good even on low, while older games usually looked completely shit on low settings. UE5 with Nanite, or Lumen, or just the insanely high level of detail in those new UE5 games, (and if you add full RT or even PT on top, the pc requirements skyrocket even more) is extremely intensive and hard to run. Thats also why UE5 titles respond so crazy good to upscaling. Upscaling is lowering rendering resolution, aka higher resolution makes the game exponentially harder to run. This is basically always true but in UE5 it reached new levels.
ALSO, factor in inflation and general increasd in prices after the C19 farce. 2017: GTX 1080ti with a MSRP of 699$ 2024: the same 699$ are 900$, from inflation alone. the production quality has increased A LOT, like the processing nodes have gotten way smaller. All this engineering, the ongoing increase in core count, in simple electronic on the cards, the quite a lot bigger coolers, all the software features that Nvidia is consistently improving, like DLSS. Wow, DLSS upscaling tech has gotten so freaking good. I have a 32inch 4k 240hz OLED monitor, I will build a 5090 pc as soon as it gets released. So think about it - even tho I will have the best possible pc - I will absolutely use upscaling wherever DLSS is available. Especially with 4k output resolution - DLSS Quality looks just as good as native, you couldnt tell any difference. Even up to DLSS Performance (so like 1080p rendering res) ooks awesome, if you scale it to 4k. FG comes on top, with a high enough base framerate it can be great, in non competitive FPS games. all this has to be paid for. so yes, if you pay only like 300$ TODAY, you wont get cutting edge performance bc its simply not realistic.
idk why everyone with 4060s always has way lower fps than me, i play with dlss and no fg and get 120 fps on very high with only particle effects, hair, and foliage turned down to medium (1080p)
1060 Should be able to Handle 1080p FSR Q + FG or you can buy lossless scalling on steam cap the game and 30 fps and use the X3 mode while setting the game to 720P FSR Q
It does deserve it... But not for unoptimised high-end AAA for 60fps.For games using properitey game engines or other highly optimized games like FH5 , it will still give decent FPS. My personal opinion is UE 5 doesn't fulfill the performance cost to visual uplift ratio
thanks for this video i have 1650 gddr6 1fan i wasnt expecting this game to run i bought it about a yer and half it didnt stop inpressing me bro you don know how your videos are realy helping thnks again
My poor 1650 laptop started sweating when i clicked on this. Surprised it runs, but then again i somehow ran Robocop and God that game needs specs..and optmization.
The game runs FSR 3.0 which is pretty much 2.2 with 0 fixes. Now that might not be true but all i know is that FSR 3's image quality was the exact same as FSR 2.2. Wished this used FSR 3.1 which has tons of fixes and improvements to the visuals.
Why is it that games usually run better at native 720p than FSR quality at 1080p ? In theory it's the same resolution so the performance should be similar. Also I notice that native 720p uses less Vram than FSR quality at 1080p, so maybe that has something to do with it ?
The upscaler part of FSR also takes some resources and it ends up having lower FPS. The thing is, usually it's worth the FPS hit, since it also looks much better than native 720p, but not in this game!
You're assuming upscaling on shader cores like in FSR is free, when it absolutely is not. The only "free" upscaling (even though it still isn't) is what Nvidia and Intel are offering with their Tensor cores, which you are still paying for upfront. That said the cost of upscaling is more or less fixed, so it becomes a smaller percentage hit the faster your GPU is. That is why shader-based upscaling seems to take a serious hit on low end hardware, because the percentage of total GPU resources taken up becomes opportunity cost for non-upscaled performance.
Cool so I could play it with a 1650... This GPU is out there for 10paps max. And the CPU is 20-30 max. Which Mainboard to use? What's the cheapest one for that?
last breath of this ''popular'' and most affordable single slot 75w gpu. sad to see it die slowly. i'd pick one up to upgrade my 730 but.... for less than 60$ (it's price) i can get an rx 580 8gb but i can't upgrade the psu on my hp prodesk with an i5 4460 and 16gb ram. what should i do ? hang on with this or build an entire am4 pc ?
The PS5 version is using both FSR (1080p) and frame generation in the performance mode, and it's still not capable of a stable 60 fps. The result is (of course) terrible input lag, and a very blurry and noisy image. If they had lowered the settings instead, it would probably be much better, judging by how the much slower 1650 performs.
would a 1650 super make a bigger difference? i mean its only a boosted 1650 but with gddr6 may be a benefit, combined with newer specs may work better with frame gen (unlikely thought)
oh man, i guess the price really is the problem not the gpu, my 4060 is like doing 150 fps in 1440p with high qual but low shadows i think its doing pretty good
you are wrong about FSR versions again, 2.1 is the most stable and soft but it ghosts, 2.2 is the most pixelated one but great on static, 3.0 uses 2.2 and 3.1 uses 2.2 but has some own "soft blur" filter that tries to hide the pixelation that 2.2 has
is this game in on hdd or ssd? mine is 1660 super with i5 12th gen 16gb ram its playable at medium with fsr but it drops and freezes randomly and my game is one hdd what to do..i don't have space on ssd
Did not expected it to run with 30+ fps to be honest... Guess its scalable, even tho playing it like this, which dips in boss fights, is not that great
Testet the Benchmark Tool from this Game and a 3080ti on UWQHD (3440x1440)... With DLSS Set to 85 and Mixed Settings I got 50-70 FPS. Most Settings on Ultra... and raytracing off.. its horrendous how this game kills my GPU 🥵
why would devs make a game barely run on what google says is a medium spec graphics card... probably why only 10 million people bought it across all the available platforms, 150m on PS5, and then the hundreds of millions on Steam/Epic/WeGame..
That gt 1030 video gonna be fire in a grisp 240p at 10fps
🤣🤣
Fsr ultra performance in 640x480 with frame generation may give astonishing 25fps in 213x160 render resolution with very enjoyable 150ms input lag, you can go further and achieve over 60fps by using 4x lossless scaling, the latency will make the game feel like it was being streamed from the moon but it's smooth!
tbh more excited for the GT 710 if it can launch the game without exploding
@@Ka1zerM unfortunately, it doesn't support DirectX 12. 😅
@@muhammedebrarnazli_1968 theoretically the worst GPU on the planet that "should" run this game is Intel HD 500 iGPU but that's only available in some potato mobile CPUs and the performance should be measured in frames per minute rather than second, any 6th gen and above intel CPU should at least start the game if only the intel shitty drivers will allow them to
Me staring at my 4060: maybe I judged you too harshly
Yeah, I was worried seeing first benchmarks but after release actually it runs pretty well, 1080 medium with DLSS Q 70-80 fps is nice. I'm more concerned that games advance too fast compared to budget gpus, with my 2060 I could run any new game in 1080p medium-high even max. Now with 4060 and new games you can't reach 60fps on max without FG. If something won't be done in 6000 rtx series you will need 6070 for high 1080p 60fps+ experience without FG
yes bc cutting edge UE5 games look better on medium than old games on very high. You cant just take medium-high settings of completely different games, made with other engines etc., and compare them with a completely new, cutting edge UE5 title's medium setting.
medium isnt just medium. it doesnt mean the same in every game. New games have a way higher baselevel of visual fidelity. Many games still look good even on low, while older games usually looked completely shit on low settings.
UE5 with Nanite, or Lumen, or just the insanely high level of detail in those new UE5 games, (and if you add full RT or even PT on top, the pc requirements skyrocket even more) is extremely intensive and hard to run. Thats also why UE5 titles respond so crazy good to upscaling. Upscaling is lowering rendering resolution, aka higher resolution makes the game exponentially harder to run. This is basically always true but in UE5 it reached new levels.
ALSO, factor in inflation and general increasd in prices after the C19 farce.
2017: GTX 1080ti with a MSRP of 699$
2024: the same 699$ are 900$, from inflation alone.
the production quality has increased A LOT, like the processing nodes have gotten way smaller. All this engineering, the ongoing increase in core count, in simple electronic on the cards, the quite a lot bigger coolers, all the software features that Nvidia is consistently improving, like DLSS. Wow, DLSS upscaling tech has gotten so freaking good. I have a 32inch 4k 240hz OLED monitor, I will build a 5090 pc as soon as it gets released.
So think about it - even tho I will have the best possible pc - I will absolutely use upscaling wherever DLSS is available. Especially with 4k output resolution - DLSS Quality looks just as good as native, you couldnt tell any difference. Even up to DLSS Performance (so like 1080p rendering res) ooks awesome, if you scale it to 4k. FG comes on top, with a high enough base framerate it can be great, in non competitive FPS games.
all this has to be paid for. so yes, if you pay only like 300$ TODAY, you wont get cutting edge performance bc its simply not realistic.
idk why everyone with 4060s always has way lower fps than me, i play with dlss and no fg and get 120 fps on very high with only particle effects, hair, and foliage turned down to medium (1080p)
I asked my brother if a gtx 1060 could run this game.
He just said 480p and left
it should be a bit faster than this :)
I'll try it out!
Nope, it should be able to run, but don't get ya hopes up too high.
sounds like a stuck up ngl
1060 Should be able to Handle 1080p FSR Q + FG or you can buy lossless scalling on steam cap the game and 30 fps and use the X3 mode while setting the game to 720P FSR Q
@@zWORMzGaming can you test it on rx 6600
FSR gave the GTX1650 another 2 years of lifespan it probably didn't deserve.
It does deserve it... But not for unoptimised high-end AAA for 60fps.For games using properitey game engines or other highly optimized games like FH5 , it will still give decent FPS. My personal opinion is UE 5 doesn't fulfill the performance cost to visual uplift ratio
@@HareeshkarRavi Absolutely, i'd say Unreal 5 was a complete mistake.
@@PROYECTO60 Frfr
D6 does it better than this one.
thanks for this video i have 1650 gddr6 1fan i wasnt expecting this game to run i bought it about a yer and half it didnt stop inpressing me bro you don know how your videos are realy helping thnks again
retired my 1650 few days ago and i already miss it
those days mann
What did you upgrade to?
@@suprotimnandyrtx 5090 bro
@@suprotimnandy 3060 12GB
@@anonyqt1006good choice am too upgrading to RX 7600💪
@@Medstudent2024 Yoo Good Choice Buddy , Happy Upgrading 🥰🔥
Ty for testing 1650
Thanks for watching 😃
@@zWORMzGaming lmao LMAO
@@zWORMzGaming lmaoooooooooooooooooooooo
@@TheGoomaz00000000000 ????
Wow! Finally testing the low spec card
GTX 1650 is my favourite GPU
The goat of testing gpu 👍
Kindly do test this game on RTX 3060 too as it is one of the popular cards used rn. :)
It will come over the weekend 🙂
love your benchmarks!!will you be doing a 3050 card test too?
whens thee rx 580
Literally the same gpu, different brands, so ur gonna get same fps
Either tomorrow or after tomorrow! :)
@@awhellnahbro123 wrong, the rx 580 is wayyy more powerful than the gtx 1650, the rx 570 would be the equivilent
@@zWORMzGaming cant wait❤️❤️❤️
Stay tuned bro, be patient
Letss goo my brooo
Hey bro
I was waiting for you to make an gtx 1650 black myth wukong. This was my previous graphics card.
This video gonna blow up in views trust me
Thasnk you for testing my new videocard! I'm so happy that it's playable
Hi, love your content kryzzp, can you please do the final fantasy 16 demo with the 4060, its on steam and apparently not really optimized
Can you do with Rx6600?❤
Yes, it will come :)
Tnx❤@@zWORMzGaming
Ty@@zWORMzGaming
Thanks for this, now i'll expect to have a tad bit less fps on my 1650 since its on a laptop with 50 watts. ❤👍
RTX 4090 soon?
I don't have it!
Hey man, can you do a sort of round-up of which GPU is the best in their price/spec range? That would mean a lot to me!
I'm waiting to see gtx 1080
Pls test 1030 750ti & rx550 which are generally the in the same range when it's come to the newer games
My poor 1650 laptop started sweating when i clicked on this. Surprised it runs, but then again i somehow ran Robocop and God that game needs specs..and optmization.
You are an honest man .. Thank you ❤
Can you try with RTX 3050???
i actually still have the gtx 1650 on my other pc in my hometown, still kinda holds up to this day
edit: grammar
It's not bad for optimized games or older ones. I'd avoid any AAA game from 2022 and newer though!
@@zWORMzGaming yeah true, but it still plays some indie games and those that came out from mid 2018-2020
The game runs FSR 3.0 which is pretty much 2.2 with 0 fixes. Now that might not be true but all i know is that FSR 3's image quality was the exact same as FSR 2.2. Wished this used FSR 3.1 which has tons of fixes and improvements to the visuals.
thanks to you i now know that i can play the game!
If possible try to test in DX11, it works pretty well with old cards!
Will you test out Silent Hill 2 remake when it comes out? (game with similar specs and engine)
NICE VID KRYZZP! Could you try the Mínimum and Recomended settings for this game in a video? Would be great!
Thanks!! I don't have the recommended unfortunately, but planning on buying the R5 5500 just for that video 😃
Why is it that games usually run better at native 720p than FSR quality at 1080p ? In theory it's the same resolution so the performance should be similar.
Also I notice that native 720p uses less Vram than FSR quality at 1080p, so maybe that has something to do with it ?
The upscaler part of FSR also takes some resources and it ends up having lower FPS. The thing is, usually it's worth the FPS hit, since it also looks much better than native 720p, but not in this game!
Upscaling also has a cost.
The process of upscaling is not free, so the performance is a bit lower than just native 720p
You're assuming upscaling on shader cores like in FSR is free, when it absolutely is not. The only "free" upscaling (even though it still isn't) is what Nvidia and Intel are offering with their Tensor cores, which you are still paying for upfront. That said the cost of upscaling is more or less fixed, so it becomes a smaller percentage hit the faster your GPU is. That is why shader-based upscaling seems to take a serious hit on low end hardware, because the percentage of total GPU resources taken up becomes opportunity cost for non-upscaled performance.
Cool so I could play it with a 1650... This GPU is out there for 10paps max. And the CPU is 20-30 max. Which Mainboard to use? What's the cheapest one for that?
last breath of this ''popular'' and most affordable single slot 75w gpu. sad to see it die slowly. i'd pick one up to upgrade my 730 but.... for less than 60$ (it's price) i can get an rx 580 8gb but i can't upgrade the psu on my hp prodesk with an i5 4460 and 16gb ram. what should i do ? hang on with this or build an entire am4 pc ?
The PS5 version is using both FSR (1080p) and frame generation in the performance mode, and it's still not capable of a stable 60 fps. The result is (of course) terrible input lag, and a very blurry and noisy image.
If they had lowered the settings instead, it would probably be much better, judging by how the much slower 1650 performs.
would a 1650 super make a bigger difference?
i mean its only a boosted 1650 but with gddr6 may be a benefit, combined with newer specs may work better with frame gen (unlikely thought)
You can add -dx11 command at game options in steam settings to increase the performance by far margin
Bro i have nitro 5(2020) 1650ti, i5 10300H and 32gb ram..60hz btw.. is their a chance??
hey broo ur vidio always amazing,when i confuse my pc support with game or not i always see ur vidio.
me so waiting u to do gtx 1050ti broo
Thank you!
It'll come over the weekend 😃
@@zWORMzGaming alright i be waitingg
You can also use DirectX 11 in this game, just gotta use the command line.
how did you run this game :(
my spec is : Intel i5 - 4440
16 GB RAM
GTX 1650 GDDR6
SSD
i cant even shading the game at all
I have 8gb ram how many fps will I get??!!
2024 still rocking this card until its last breath
I stopped watching yo videos since i lost my rx 570. Times were good ngl.
Gonna beat the last boss on the gt 710? 👀
Of course 🤣🤣
You should try with amfm2 with lossless scaling app it reduces input lag very much compared to this game native fsr implementation
Can you test it with the 1080ti
oh man, i guess the price really is the problem not the gpu, my 4060 is like doing 150 fps in 1440p with high qual but low shadows i think its doing pretty good
How much better is the gtx 1660 super to this gpu?
i think tsr quality is bind to anti-aliasing quality?
you are wrong about FSR versions again, 2.1 is the most stable and soft but it ghosts, 2.2 is the most pixelated one but great on static, 3.0 uses 2.2 and 3.1 uses 2.2 but has some own "soft blur" filter that tries to hide the pixelation that 2.2 has
It's a shite implementation in this one. It's 3.0, looks like crap
Nice bro
Thnx for gtx 1650 content
I have gtx1660super 8gb ram i3 processor. Can I run it on my pc plz help.
who don't have great GPU and CPU -this will be great gaming experiance..
Just tested Wukong bench tool with my A580 and 11400f, this game has NO optimalisation!
At least Xess works and looks better than TSR and Fsr.
1080p Low with FSR set to 50% res and a few settings on medium would be perfect. FG just doesn't work to make unplayable games playable.
67% already looked too bad with the noise, better use 720p native than that. Let alone 50%, avoid FSR
Mine is actually unplayable :l what's wrong with my machine?
is this game in on hdd or ssd? mine is 1660 super with i5 12th gen 16gb ram its playable at medium with fsr but it drops and freezes randomly and my game is one hdd what to do..i don't have space on ssd
Will u test 1660 super
*Me who looks at my gtx 1650 laptop*
My laptop:
Hell nah
Please do GTX 1660ti next!
Bro with ryzen 5 3500u 8 gb ram and 1650gtx does it work?
Could a hand cam with the mouse show the input latency from frame generation?
How about GTX 1650 SUPER dude?? is it have same result??
No bro kind of 10 fps more but great
When's the rtx 3060 video?
I tested a GTX 1070 and it plays better than the 1650 GDDR6 version.
Well duh, the 1070 is over 70% faster. Anything that costs more than $200 brand new or $100 on the second hand market will run faster than the 1650.
Como sempre video muito topp
1660 super when?
I'm on a laptop, RTX 3050 Ti, do you think is worth?
If 4gb no. 6gb vram yes.
Thanks for 16 subscribers
Did not expected it to run with 30+ fps to be honest... Guess its scalable, even tho playing it like this, which dips in boss fights, is not that great
Looks like the ps5 version💪🏼🔥🔥
i also have gtx 1650 but it so laggy and the image is like shattered, any tips?
Testet the Benchmark Tool from this Game and a 3080ti on UWQHD (3440x1440)... With DLSS Set to 85 and Mixed Settings I got 50-70 FPS. Most Settings on Ultra... and raytracing off.. its horrendous how this game kills my GPU 🥵
Ryzen 5 3500H GTX 1650 8gb ram wukong is freezzzing not smooth gameplay pliz any fix or idea ?
*Aw shame to see this, many people use this in office PCs, will need like a 3050 6GB minimum*
Nice video
Thanks!
why would devs make a game barely run on what google says is a medium spec graphics card...
probably why only 10 million people bought it across all the available platforms, 150m on PS5, and then the hundreds of millions on Steam/Epic/WeGame..
I don't think it's possible to fix input lag in frame generation? That would be an entirely different technology to fix that problem, yea?
I guess! I think it'll become irrelevant in the future, but for now, there's quite a bit of input lag. It's early stages of FG
Respect 🤍🫡
RX 6600 PLS
1080ti next, please 🙏🏻
When the 3060 ti plz ❤
How is the 2080 super ?
Hey bro Can you test with a Ryzen 7 1700x and a RX6700XT pls ^^ ?
Oof, big bottleneck!
I test GPUs mostly, when I test the 1700X it'll likely be with a higher end GPU (for no GPU bottlenecks)
Do the RX 6700 XT next
Wonder how the Titan X might do with this game….
How is a 1060 better than a 1650?
Test Intel Arc a580.
Can u test with RTX 2050??
Rx 580 test when????
Either tomorrow of after tomorrow!
@@zWORMzGaming awesome 💯
Lets gooo
3060 VIDEO WHEN KING???
Not sure yet!
4060.
Do one with gtx 1660 super ❤️
When is 3060 12gb?
Is it true that this game doesn't run properly on AMD cards ? 😢 Rx6700xt user here .
The 6700xt is running similar to a 4060 (just finished recording it, it'll come tomorrow)
@@zWORMzGaming thank you for replying, my 6700xt is just one year old and I play at 1440p I don't think it'll last another year, thanks to UE 5.🥲
Looks like old meme videos that got reuploaded 50000 times and compressed to half each time. But at least it runs...?