Arizona State would’ve been 9/10th if they didn’t have auto-bid… better resume than Indiana and Clemson, debatably vs Tennessee as well… more ranked wins, and a conf championship, both have two losses
He's from winnsboro Louisiana, Anthony his real name. We can't pronounce that when we lil so he booger . I got another friend named Anthony we call toe. It's because we knew each other very very young
I had a lot of respect for the SEC But when they had the power to put in teams for the baseball playoffs they over picked s e c teams so measure for measure
I’m getting a sense that this is an anti sec channel. I’m an Engineering grad from Georgia so maybe I’m partial to the SEC. Say what you will but no denying top to bottom the SEC is more talented,deeper, and tougher than any other conference. Big 10 is strong but just look at the results of the past 20 years. Winning % vs other conferences, NFL first round picks, National Championships, bowl wins, it’s not even close. Sure Michigan won it all last and maybe 1 time in 6-10 years another conference will produce a Natty champ. But if you honestly think SMU is better than Bama then you’re crazy. These rankings are wildly inconsistent. How is SMU ranked ahead of Clemson less than 15 hours after they just lost to Clemson 😂 Also I don’t care about seeing deserving teams play for natties. I want to see the best teams playing for a Natty champ. Also winning more games playing a cake schedule isn’t “earning” it. They won more games but that’s like saying someone that has a lawn care business and they just cut grass without over seeding, fertilizing…sure they cut more yards but they aren’t a quality landscaping professional as compared to a full service landscaper. I don’t want to see the regular season diminished because teams are afraid of scheduling a tough non con schedule.
Arizona State would’ve been 9/10th if they didn’t have auto-bid… better resume than Indiana and Clemson, debatably vs Tennessee as well… more ranked wins, and a conf championship, both have two losses
if my math is correct, Oregon has already beat three playoff teams - Boise State, Ohio State, and Penn State. incredible stat imo
That’s correct. Would need to beat 3 more to win it all, which would be crazy
The issue over the years has been the rankings
Maybe don't have rankings
Use a formula
How did Buggers parents know how he would be as an adult when they named him?
They are time shifters
He's from winnsboro Louisiana, Anthony his real name. We can't pronounce that when we lil so he booger . I got another friend named Anthony we call toe. It's because we knew each other very very young
I had a lot of respect for the SEC
But when they had the power to put in teams for the baseball playoffs they over picked s e c teams so measure for measure
I’m getting a sense that this is an anti sec channel. I’m an Engineering grad from Georgia so maybe I’m partial to the SEC. Say what you will but no denying top to bottom the SEC is more talented,deeper, and tougher than any other conference. Big 10 is strong but just look at the results of the past 20 years. Winning % vs other conferences, NFL first round picks, National Championships, bowl wins, it’s not even close. Sure Michigan won it all last and maybe 1 time in 6-10 years another conference will produce a Natty champ. But if you honestly think SMU is better than Bama then you’re crazy. These rankings are wildly inconsistent. How is SMU ranked ahead of Clemson less than 15 hours after they just lost to Clemson 😂 Also I don’t care about seeing deserving teams play for natties. I want to see the best teams playing for a Natty champ. Also winning more games playing a cake schedule isn’t “earning” it. They won more games but that’s like saying someone that has a lawn care business and they just cut grass without over seeding, fertilizing…sure they cut more yards but they aren’t a quality landscaping professional as compared to a full service landscaper. I don’t want to see the regular season diminished because teams are afraid of scheduling a tough non con schedule.
Not even reading that. Def not anti-SEC