Einsten v. Bohr: A Fatal Flaw In Quantum Physics?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024
  • Professor Jim Al-Khalili reveals how, in the 1930s, Einstein thought he'd found a fatal flaw in quantum physics. Danish physicist Niels Bohr disagreed with Einstein, and the two spent decades trying to prove they're the one who's right.
    Welcome to Progress -- the home of history's greatest leaps forward. From the seismic invention of the world's first printing press to the great rocket-powered marvels that took us to the stars, we'll be bringing you world-class documentaries celebrating history's greatest inventions and technological breakthroughs.
    Progress is part of the History Hit Network. #Documentary #Technology
    Discover the past on History Hit with ad-free exclusive podcasts and documentaries released weekly presented by world renowned historians Dan Snow, Suzannah Lipscomb, Matt Lewis and more. Get 50% off your first 3 months with code PROGRESS 👉 access.history...

ความคิดเห็น • 123

  • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546
    @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I have learned so much from Professor Jim Al-Khalili. He is a genius. I could only hope to be as smart as him.

  • @mateozhou
    @mateozhou ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Why is the third experiment with the laser “card game” subtracted? How did you arrive at that equation as the one to use? Why was only one result subtracted, especially since you went into the experiment with the equation on the board.

  • @lindseydejesus1877
    @lindseydejesus1877 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    cool! i took an undergrad quantum mechanics class at uni, but this explained the connections between simple concepts like the PE and BBR way better that then prof.

  • @MaxAbramson3
    @MaxAbramson3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Abramson Collision Hypothesis (from Collision Theory): infrared photons are absorbed by electrons, increasing the speed of molecuules. When two molecules or atoms with infrared photons collide, their infrared photons add energies amd release a single photon, usually a red, orange, or yellow. An experiment to prove/disprove this would find the shortest wavelength that motivates molecules to move, so the upper limit of color emitted should be half the wavelength of the upper limit of the infrared photons released, or somewhere around yellow.

  • @allthumbs3792
    @allthumbs3792 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A very special communicator, Professos Khalili makes this topic ALMOST clear! How real is reality? I've watched a dozen times and read a few other explanations and I'm still 10% baffled. That's progress anyway!

  • @PJANGELES30
    @PJANGELES30 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jim Al-K is the best communicator of Science. There is no one better.

  • @9126786
    @9126786 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Congratulations for meeting with Mr. Bell in 1989 and giving such a beautifully articulated narrative of the Nature and gestalt of Reality. I think the wish of The Almighty is the bedrock and because Truth by disposition has only one answer, thus the Esoteric and Science have to be and are in essence in sync... Be blessed for walking me through and giving me the glimpse of the development being done by Beautiful minds across the Globe.

  • @LRRPF52
    @LRRPF52 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    An extraordinary exposition -- Larry M.Scott

  • @ickymouth
    @ickymouth ปีที่แล้ว

    The statement in your opening "everything that we thought we knew could be wrong", if that were possible it does not paint the science done to date in a very good light.

  • @janklaas6885
    @janklaas6885 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    📍42:58

  • @nevinsonlotterman5492
    @nevinsonlotterman5492 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Gravity is the reason why everything falls down

  • @restlessdiesel
    @restlessdiesel ปีที่แล้ว

    I like this guy and his humility.

  • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546
    @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546 ปีที่แล้ว

    Professor Khlalili: Since you are an experimentalist: Should you be so inclined, could you reassess Bell's inequality under the premises if CIG Theory is correct. Would the interpretation be different? Would Einstein be vindicated. My guess is yes, he would but, in the context of Bell's work, I've nothing to back it up. Oh well I'm just talking to myself again.

  • @LA_Viking
    @LA_Viking ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This was an excellent presentation of advertisements. It’s a bloody pity that such a thoughtful presentation had to be continually interrupted by spurts of educational material.

    • @CameronBrtnik
      @CameronBrtnik ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ok boomer

    • @biffnarzilla4649
      @biffnarzilla4649 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you subscribed to TH-cam TV, you wouldn't get any advertisements. But then...

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 ปีที่แล้ว

      I HAVE PERFECTED THE FUNDAMENTAL UNIFICATION REGARDING PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE:
      The dimensions of SPACE are, in fact, balanced. Proportionately, one part in comparison with two parts is BOTH one half AND one third. This can be, and it is, true in physics. IMPORTANT. Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. INDEED, consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground !! Now, notice the TRANSLUCENT and blue sky ON BALANCE. (THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE.) Notice that the maria do occupy ONE THIRD of the near side of WHAT IS THE MOON !! (Notice that what is the ORANGE AND SETTING SUN IS the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE ON BALANCE.) The density of LAVA IS about THREE TIMES that of water !!! ONE HALF multiplied times ONE THIRD IS ONE SIXTH !! GREAT. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Consider what is the fully illuminated AND setting/WHITE MOON ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! Accordingly, the land surface area of WHAT IS THE EARTH is, in fact, EXACTLY 29 percent, AS this IS balanced between ONE THIRD AND ONE QUARTER. Magnificent. (Do consider what is the orange AND setting SUN ON BALANCE.) INDEED, the bulk density of WHAT IS THE MOON IS comparable to that of (volcanic) basaltic lavas ON THE EARTH !!! Fantastic. One third multiplied times one half IS one sixth. This (CLEARLY AND ALSO) explains the surface gravity of what is the Moon in what constitutes DIRECT and fundamental comparison with what is THE EARTH. Notice that the lunar crust IS then (about) TWICE as thick on it's far side ON BALANCE (or comparatively). Great !!! WHAT IS GRAVITY is, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. (BALANCE AND COMPLETENESS GO HAND IN HAND.) TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. Perfect. (Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE.) Finally, also consider the fact that the density of pure water IS HALF of that of what constitutes packed sand/wet packed sand.
      By Frank Martin DiMeglio

    • @tikaanipippin
      @tikaanipippin ปีที่แล้ว

      @@biffnarzilla4649 I don't get any advertisements, My mind produces antiadvertisement particles which magically just annihilate them. Poof! Gone.

  • @paulkesler1744
    @paulkesler1744 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So maybe the philosopher Berkeley was right: "To be is to be perceived," and there is no objective reality beyond our subjective experience of it. Better known as "subjective idealism."

  • @murallivengadasalam1300
    @murallivengadasalam1300 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So.. it's a particle at the start, by the time it hits a surface it becomes a particle again. So in between it's a wave.

  • @abhisheksejwal
    @abhisheksejwal 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That song.

  • @EYEBALLKLOTT
    @EYEBALLKLOTT ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes

  • @intelligentdesign4435
    @intelligentdesign4435 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bell was wrong

  • @pablocopello3592
    @pablocopello3592 ปีที่แล้ว

    Real is what exist "outside" our minds, contrary to "imaginary" that exist inside
    a mind. We (humans) have the incredible arrogance of trying to impose our
    intuitions about how reality has to be, in such a way that if something is
    anti-intuitive we say that it cannot be "real". So, if objects (electrons, photons
    etc) behave in a non-local way (as QM predicts), we say that those objects are
    "not real", why?: because "we know" that reality has to be local, why?: because
    "that is obvious" why? because that is strongly intuitive. That is, experiments
    demonstrate that objects do not follow locality, but instead of accepting that
    reality can be highly anti-intuitive, most physicist adopt an incredibly arrogant
    position and say instead that those objects cannot be "real" because reality has
    to necessarily be local as their intuition says. More, the fact that the quantum
    world is so weird, in a way that nobody could have imagined, is strong evidence of
    the existence of a reality "outside" and independent of our minds. The fact that
    reality in the quantum realm is so anti-intuitive is to be expected, because our
    "intuition" as well as our perceptual-world evolved to optimize our survival chances by
    developing an intuition of the realm of reality most immediate to our living experience.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quanta are not objects. They are properties. This was correctly explained to you in high school, you simply don't remember.

  • @sohamjoshi9527
    @sohamjoshi9527 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It just seems like the dealer was travelling back in time and rigging each pair after he knew what your winning condition was. It's not really the case that it's unknowable and random... The randomness seems to be the conclusion because you have assumed traveling back in time is a constraint. But it just well may not be is what is proven here.

  • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546
    @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546 ปีที่แล้ว

    I believe that CIG Theory offers a reasonable all clear of the Double Scoop Ice Cream Cone experiment.

  • @fiveshorts
    @fiveshorts ปีที่แล้ว

    Music is cool.

  • @MishbakhulMunir
    @MishbakhulMunir ปีที่แล้ว

    Kami beda dgn entste, kami memproduksi particle, sedangkan entste mencari particle itupo belom tentu ketemu !!...💎💎💎😎💖

  • @mrloop1530
    @mrloop1530 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Of course he did. Everyone makes mistakes with pretty much everything.

  • @monkeyrobotsinc.9875
    @monkeyrobotsinc.9875 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These videos are for like, tv n00bs right

  • @philoso377
    @philoso377 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mistake? They didn’t made with their theory. Only confused by : our limited understanding in the problem itself and choice of apparatus, application and interpretation of its result.

  • @danielpaulson8838
    @danielpaulson8838 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant. Thank you for posting. I'm surprised your channel attracts the insecure theistic reality deniers.

  • @richg2881
    @richg2881 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Maybe Bell's Inequality was wrong.

    • @sourabhkumar3194
      @sourabhkumar3194 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah

    • @TheDavidlloydjones
      @TheDavidlloydjones ปีที่แล้ว

      Bell's inequality is an observation, not a theory.
      Your run will vary -- by a few photons, a small fraction of a percent.

  • @hs0zcw
    @hs0zcw ปีที่แล้ว

    Spin a coin and accurately predict how it will land. You cannot, and while it is spinning --it is heads or tails or perhaps both. If you can accept that, . you can forgive the quantum mechanics scientists dealing with quantum uncertainty.

  • @mickmccrory8534
    @mickmccrory8534 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    In quantum mechanics, the cat has a 50% probability of being dead.
    In relativity, the cat has 9 lives.

    • @sumeetsharma7256
      @sumeetsharma7256 ปีที่แล้ว

      But not at the same time!!

    • @sumeetsharma7256
      @sumeetsharma7256 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quantum cat can be dead and alive at once%%

    • @mrloop1530
      @mrloop1530 ปีที่แล้ว

      No. In quantum mechanics, the cat has a 100% probability of being dead. And a 100% probability of being alive.

  • @gracefuldrowning138
    @gracefuldrowning138 ปีที่แล้ว

    The absolute pinnacle of British engineering!

  • @donclay3511
    @donclay3511 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why isn't the -.59 subtracted instead of added?

    • @Mownstarain
      @Mownstarain ปีที่แล้ว

      What was your answer then?

    • @donclay3511
      @donclay3511 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mownstarain I haven't gotten an answer yet.

    • @ZeHoSmusician
      @ZeHoSmusician ปีที่แล้ว +2

      53:24 Basic mathematics: substracting a negative number equates to adding it.

  • @keithkucera3163
    @keithkucera3163 ปีที่แล้ว

    They are not in two places at once they are in two times in one place

  • @DavidHuber63
    @DavidHuber63 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Albert Einstein is right, end of discussion! ❤️🙏🏼

    • @senategrandprix3503
      @senategrandprix3503 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He actually wasn’t about everything.. he was born 70 years to late

    • @DavidHuber63
      @DavidHuber63 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@senategrandprix3503 light years?

    • @zeitghost1321
      @zeitghost1321 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Quantum mechanics enters the chat

    • @DavidHuber63
      @DavidHuber63 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zeitghost1321 it's about time

    • @ФилипВасилевски
      @ФилипВасилевски ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@zeitghost1321 still Einstein is right, quantum mechanics dont

  • @Naidu-k8m
    @Naidu-k8m ปีที่แล้ว

    Einstein the poster boy of the science group that was practically studying everything about anything. They managed to come up with many facts n theories. Which the poster boy happily repainted with his own brush. And the west has made him god of science evr since

  • @Fiatluc
    @Fiatluc ปีที่แล้ว

    And this here my friends is the reason why our current understanding of the world became stagnant. Wonder why could that be? Well, maybe because the current understanding of quantum mechanics is WRONG.

  • @BrahminVaad_BaqiSab_Bakwaas
    @BrahminVaad_BaqiSab_Bakwaas ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought QUANTA was coined by PLANCK.

  • @stewiesaidthat
    @stewiesaidthat ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Einstein was a fraud. The biggest fraud ever. There is no such thing as relativity when you have an absolute. That absolute is the speed of light.
    1) SOL is constant in a vacuum
    2) SOL is the fastest anything can travel in this universe
    3) Light travels independent of its source.
    That means you can measure your speed against the speed of light and come up with the same value every time.
    Relativity is only valid when you want to compare two co-moving objects. Since neither object can travel faster than light, that makes motion absolute. And time, being a measurement of motion, makes time absolute.

    • @BrahminVaad_BaqiSab_Bakwaas
      @BrahminVaad_BaqiSab_Bakwaas ปีที่แล้ว

      ❤❤👍👍👏👏

    • @stewiesaidthat
      @stewiesaidthat ปีที่แล้ว

      @jeppeachtonnielsen6138 there is no such thing as time-dilation from acceleration in space. Get that nonsense out of your head. Einstein’s own light clock thought experiment shows that the force of light changes the further you move away from the source. Or, if moving towards the source, increases. It's no different than standing 20' feet from a fire hose and measuring the force and then moving back 40 feet and measuring the amount of force.
      Clocks measure one's motion through space. As speed increases, clock cycles decrease. Greater distance, less force.
      Synchronized clocks measure relative MOTION. Not time. Quit drinking the kool-aid. It's rotting your brain and not allowing you to think for yourself.

  • @richardleetbluesharmonicac7192
    @richardleetbluesharmonicac7192 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can explain the gap between general relativity quantum mechanics in five minutes to a third grader. Einstein did not make any mistakes.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So you didn't read his paper on the photoelectric effect, then. At least not with both eyes open. ;-)

  • @pelasgeuspelasgeus4634
    @pelasgeuspelasgeus4634 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Einstein made no mistake because he simply copied Poincare (among others). So don't blame the plagiarist.

  • @Pegasus4213
    @Pegasus4213 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Spare us the history of science! Reality is consciousness!

    • @ФилипВасилевски
      @ФилипВасилевски ปีที่แล้ว

      So relativity is wrong? Quantum mechanics is right?

    • @Pegasus4213
      @Pegasus4213 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ФилипВасилевски Well, if science, or anyone, views their existence as IF it is ONLY a physical existence and that consequently, our consciousness is merely a physically produced phenomenon. then relativity or quantum theory will appear to be the most important thing to understand.
      That means, that IF reality and our experience of this physical dimension is actually a spiritual or nonphysical phenomenon, science is missing that very fundamental understanding! Consciousness is the nature of reality, and physical dimensions are the product of consciousness. This fact is more important than whether relativity or quantum theory can afford insight into the true nature of existence.

    • @Mownstarain
      @Mownstarain ปีที่แล้ว

      beautiful! They want to study it though because of the new technologies that can arise from it like teleportation...

  • @johannaprice4880
    @johannaprice4880 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🎉

  • @xproflipscarab
    @xproflipscarab 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've gotta say this is well put together video but is absolutely abysmal and explaining anything at all...
    First off the anologies are so ridiculously convoluted and non sensicle and secondly the whole thing ends on an experiment and equation that is not explained in the slightest and we are just told X means Y.
    Why are we talking about quantum mechanics being observed and comparing them to human vision?
    Human vision is completely irrelevant and entirely imaginary (LITTERALLY), Sight is the physical process of a bioelectrical reaction in our eyes caused by the properties of the photons that enter, which is then interpreted by an infinitely complex arrangement of electrical wiring (The Brain) which emerges as our consciousness.
    "Observing" AKA measuring/reading/detecting an elementary particle has nothing to do with sight (Seriously WTF Has a chemical reaction in your cone cells have to do with the spin of particle in a machine with 0 physical connection to you)...
    Why does every single video on quantum mechanics talk about observing particles in such misleading ways... How do you measure/test an object that is the single most fundamental "thing" we know of, there is no "sub-particle particle" that photons give off that you can detect with a sensor to give you information...
    So what then? How is it possible to observe quantum mechanics if they are the final stop/component? Well we use all of that fancy machinery and computing power that i will not pretend to understand... What do these things do to extract information about that elementary particle? We detect changes... We shoot said particle or bounce another particle off it which then reacts with what ever sensor you have designed to extrapolate information.
    When we say observe what we really mean is that we physically interact with the particle using whatever it is geniuses use to detect these particles... So when we say an elementary particle only changes or becomes a certain state when being observed what we really mean is THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY TO EXTRAPOLATE "DATA" / "KNOW" WHAT A PARTICLE IS WITHOUT PHYSICALLY REACTING / ACTING ON SAID PARTICLE...
    On the human scale observing / extracting data is simple, The photons reacting with an apple has no relevant effect on it's existence when visually observing it... Using sonar to to react with surrounding matter in the ocean has no relevant effect when we need to map geometry... Using a digital thermometer to detect the energy emitted from an object has no physical effect on the object we are measuring... BUT when we go all the way down to an elementary particle its physically impossible to measure a property of said particle without affecting it in some way unless we discover some other "thing" that is emmited from said particle that we can detect completely separate from the particle...
    This all sound incredibly complicated and a complete mess compared to "Observing a particle defines the particle" but you can put in laymens term very easily without causing all this pointless confusion and false equivilances:
    It's impossible to "observe" a particle without directly interacting with the particle therefore we can never truly know anything about said particle because to observe it we have to react with it and therefor essentially contaminate it in the process.
    And then we get to the ridiculous card analogy... What the analogy represents is never truly clear, The things that happen within the "game" are never explained or linked to the real world physics it apparently represents...
    The cards represent a particle ok, But the dealer is a completely pointless entity; regardless whether SpookyAAAD is real or not there is no governing "thing" behind it, they just exist that way.
    Then it really becomes senseless, What the hell do the Games/Rules represent? what do the color of the cards represent?
    Then more importantly HOW IN HOLY JESUS DO YOU JUST DYNAMICALLY DECIDE THE RULES... This isn't actually a card game It's the physical properties of physical space... I genuinely can even guess what this is supposed to represent in quantum mechanics so your analogy is completely dysfunctional and ends up doing the complete opposite of it's intended purpose: make complex information easily understandable.
    And finally the experiment which is meant to prove to us which theory is correct... #1 The equation provided literally means nothing to anyone because it's never explained or linked to reality... #2 The experiment in question also means absolutely nothing to anyone because it's never explained how it works or why it works or why the results mean the things they do...
    Lasers make entangled particles... Machine "observes" particle pairs... Machine plays game?.. Mysterious dials with mysterious function are apparently the counterpart to the rules in our card game?.. We then adjust mysterious dials to "Change" the rules and the mystery statistics spat out by the mystery game entered into our mystery equation some how correlates to Einstein wrong, Particles only exist when we "observe" them and instantaneously determine the properties of its entangled twin faster than reletivistically possible...
    Ok then... That makes perfect sense... Not absolute mumbo jumbo nonsense at all...
    SO PLEASE SOMEONE TELL ME, How does a mathmatical equation in anyway know the state of 2 particles without "observing" them... I'm sorry even by quantum standards how is it remotely fucking possible to confirm or deny anything about a particle that you haven't ever interacted with...
    1 thing is for sure this video literally teaches you nothing about the topic it is talking about, All it does is tell you things work the way they do with absolutely 0 insight or explination

  • @gavinheller4974
    @gavinheller4974 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not very dense information. I dislike your “style” where it’s a very B-roll, filler sequence show. Just thought it was annoying to see so much of you instead of the actual physics and experiments in question

  • @melk33
    @melk33 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think Germans should let go of Einsteins brain discard it to Israel. Fair

    • @biffnarzilla4649
      @biffnarzilla4649 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Americans actually have it. It's in a jar in solution in New Jersey at the University Medical Center of Princeton.

  • @hs0zcw
    @hs0zcw ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Remember that only Donald Trump can look directly at the sun.

    • @stevep2448
      @stevep2448 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's easy for someone who conflates 'can' with 'should'.

    • @chunguyen6928
      @chunguyen6928 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂 lol 👍

    • @cidfacetious3722
      @cidfacetious3722 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Remember, the sun can’t stare directly at Chuck Norris

    • @justicegear85
      @justicegear85 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No. I can look directly at the sun and have done so for a millennia. You fail.

    • @whirledpeas3477
      @whirledpeas3477 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The Donald 2024😮

  • @frankdimeglio8216
    @frankdimeglio8216 ปีที่แล้ว

    I HAVE PERFECTED THE FUNDAMENTAL UNIFICATION REGARDING PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE:
    The dimensions of SPACE are, in fact, balanced. Proportionately, one part in comparison with two parts is BOTH one half AND one third. This can be, and it is, true in physics. IMPORTANT. Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. INDEED, consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground !! Now, notice the TRANSLUCENT and blue sky ON BALANCE. (THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE.) Notice that the maria do occupy ONE THIRD of the near side of WHAT IS THE MOON !! (Notice that what is the ORANGE AND SETTING SUN IS the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE ON BALANCE.) The density of LAVA IS about THREE TIMES that of water !!! ONE HALF multiplied times ONE THIRD IS ONE SIXTH !! GREAT. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Consider what is the fully illuminated AND setting/WHITE MOON ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! Accordingly, the land surface area of WHAT IS THE EARTH is, in fact, EXACTLY 29 percent, AS this IS balanced between ONE THIRD AND ONE QUARTER. Magnificent. (Do consider what is the orange AND setting SUN ON BALANCE.) INDEED, the bulk density of WHAT IS THE MOON IS comparable to that of (volcanic) basaltic lavas ON THE EARTH !!! Fantastic. One third multiplied times one half IS one sixth. This (CLEARLY AND ALSO) explains the surface gravity of what is the Moon in what constitutes DIRECT and fundamental comparison with what is THE EARTH. Notice that the lunar crust IS then (about) TWICE as thick on it's far side ON BALANCE (or comparatively). Great !!! WHAT IS GRAVITY is, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. (BALANCE AND COMPLETENESS GO HAND IN HAND.) TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. Perfect. (Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE.) Finally, also consider the fact that the density of pure water IS HALF of that of what constitutes packed sand/wet packed sand.
    By Frank Martin DiMeglio

  • @Mownstarain
    @Mownstarain ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We go back to the biblical GENESIS.... "Let there be light!" And there was light...

  • @JamesWylde
    @JamesWylde ปีที่แล้ว

    Full of ad spam

  • @SciD1
    @SciD1 ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually, it's one of the only things He got right. The other two is when He didn't believe black holes existed, nor gravy waves.

    • @MuffinMan87
      @MuffinMan87 ปีที่แล้ว

      He actually did believe in gravity waves, but called it the aether.

  • @AbdullahPunctureWale-BePgCxx
    @AbdullahPunctureWale-BePgCxx 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Einstein always made a mistake. A classic imposter

  • @unnikrishnannairkrishnannair.
    @unnikrishnannairkrishnannair. ปีที่แล้ว

    🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹

  • @kricketflyd111
    @kricketflyd111 ปีที่แล้ว

    When Moses went to pharaoh and asked for his photons to be understood God hardened pharaoh's heart and he said No!

  • @ash7604yaman
    @ash7604yaman ปีที่แล้ว

    Einstein was a brilliant person his background his family knows he was in Germany also studied Indian calculations which the nazis or germans stole from India so the germans could progress in space technology, India was invaded by Alexander the Macedonian but was defeated and the Indian military might repelled the Macedonian might and little mosquitoes had the better of Alexandr he was son of swords man in today's terms he would be called son of a witch ,the Roman ,Greek imperialists managed to enter into India by Portuguese traders they took wives of the so called untouchable people of India now called Anglo Indians who converted to Roman imperialists christianity, Einstein was a student at his young age and took intrest in physics, mathematics, science he had a Jewish back ground he worked in the patent department and understood physics ,very little is known of his secret but he went to America as the nazis were killing the Jewish population in Europe under the Roman imperialists banner the eagle, the swastika was used signifying the Indian sign Indian people have lived in Europe for over 2,000 years and knowledge was wide spread throughout Africa Asia Afghanistan, Arabia,China, even into Japan, Indian civilisation also into Australia and many other islands going back thousands of years between the times after Noah's ark and before the parting of the red sea, eastern civilisation built temples all over into China ,Afghanistan ,Persia, these temples are one of the wonders like the Egyptian pyramids where the USA doller plays a part in wealth control the one eyed pyramid currency with no value at all the true value is no more than 25 cents in printing the bogus currency which is not attached to the gold ,so the people in America like the USA are European imperialist settlers on the indigenous peoples land which was not God given but invaded with mass exicutions of the indigenous people known as red Indians but they were not Indians it's only that Spanish Europeans who were craving for riches fooled the people with alcohol and false christianity ,music made the red Indian feel merry during Christmas day and the European took advantage of that time and massacred the population through deception, Rome confessed the acts committed genocide which still goes on throught the world and generations of European settlers have the same butchery mindset to exterminate all those who oppose the Roman imperialists agenda, we live in dangerous times and given rise to groups like the women oppressors like the Taliban, ISIS,luskari toba in Pakistan,the sunni Shia conflict, the creation of Saudi regime in Arabia, the Yemeni conflicts, the Christian Zionist movement ,the oppression of black African Americans, the rise of capitalism, the enslavement of loans through enslavement, the rise of Chinese world demination in producing low quality cheap goods which only Chinese can use ,the regime change ideology setting puppet regime its plain as a clear mirror without the E=mc □ now figure this out without mathematics without luminati bull sht and tarot cards which is from the devil many Christians use that to get information from the jinn world jinns are spirits without bodies the Pakistan and Afghanistan people use the services of the jinn world to commit acts of terrorism and to enrich themselves by means of corruption ,the drug cartels violence is a means to enrich themselves, the Afghanistan Taliban are not doing what the Koran teaches to live a peaceful moral life only a few people who follow Koran and Ahlulbayt are servants of God, but terrorist groups are non Islamic groups which needs to be vaporized completely from the face of the earth prisons have to built for these devil worshippers and dont let them out till the day they esept or embrace what prophet jesus, and prophet Mohammed pbuh and his progeny brought true religious duties and conduct specially the laws of countries they live in . If a so called Muslim does not do according to the teachings of Koran and Ahlulbayt that person must be handed over to the department of corrections to judged and sentenced according to law and the punishment ascribed to such offenders that will be the punishment for putting one on the straight and narrow, if he or she does another crime that double the punishment

    • @jamieflame01
      @jamieflame01 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah not really

  • @ruskiny280
    @ruskiny280 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Get to the point, far better one's available.

  • @luisolivero9820
    @luisolivero9820 ปีที่แล้ว

    i believe that Jesuschrist used to quantum Mechanics because he is GOD

    • @danielpaulson8838
      @danielpaulson8838 ปีที่แล้ว

      Theism uses science because it has nothing of its own.

  • @minhsp3
    @minhsp3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like Brian Greene, this guy is latching on to greatness to justify his mediocre science profession

    • @danielpaulson8838
      @danielpaulson8838 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They are highly popular teachers and both great scientists. You sound like you must be waiting on payday.

  • @Mownstarain
    @Mownstarain ปีที่แล้ว

    Seems to me that reality is faith... If you will and believe, there woud be... Just like what Jesus said about faith.

  • @linqua1728
    @linqua1728 ปีที่แล้ว

    If the bible said there are no shadows in Heaven, how can light therefore be a particle? If you also believe in simultaneous realities, why the perceived confusion? Ask God, not men.

    • @aku7598
      @aku7598 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is there sun in heaven
      Or edison light bulb.
      What is the source of the light?

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You need to stop drinking, kid. :-)

  • @woosterrooster3880
    @woosterrooster3880 ปีที่แล้ว

    Einstein was a plagiarist.

    • @ousmanceesay6238
      @ousmanceesay6238 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      why do you say that?

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ousmanceesay6238 Because he wants attention. ;-)

    • @BenLapke
      @BenLapke ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@schmetterling4477 if Einstein was a plagiarist, I’m sure he didn’t plagiarize any one with Wooster Rooster’s intellectual abilities.

    • @markb3786
      @markb3786 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BenLapke Nice!

    • @MuffinMan87
      @MuffinMan87 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ousmanceesay6238 He stole his wife's work.