It seems to me (judging by the graphic depiction) that when we finally understand why these strange phenomena occur the wavelike illustration used might also describe and/or lead to scientists understanding force fields, magnetism for example. Awkward, I know, but the poorly defined path of the quantum looks like a field, not a lot of individual particles.
It is the fisrt time that I see Jim Al-Khalili, I’ve been following his Life Scientific podcast on bbc radio4 since 2018 my IELTS preparation time. I wanna thank mr. Jim Al-Khalili and his podcast guests for that amazing show.
Thank god for the BBC making docs like this, if it wasn't for BBC Horizon docs like this one or Professor Brian Cox and Sir David Attenborough there would be nothing intelligent left on TV
Thank you all British subjects for paying your telly taxes so us in the Commonwealth colonies can still soak up the culture of our mother country. From Canada.
I find it repulsive that you praise the work of Cox and Attenborough, you credit the BBC for availing their work, and you thank an invisible mythical being for making it all possible. Perhaps one day the BBC will air a program to demonstrate where you went wrong.
Seen all these when they were on TV. Jim is superb at these documentaries. This is the kind of content I approve of on TH-cam. Leave the short form - non educational content to other apps for those with no attention spans.
@@MegaLmae I think you'll find a lot do agree with my statement, just ask anybody with a brain and wasn't born in the 2000's. You cared enough to comment, heyyyyy 👋🏻
So, the "fabric" of space itself, in between the galaxies, is what is expanding. And what is this fabric made of? Nothing. "The universe itself, in it's entirety, is getting bigger" -So, its endlessness is getting even more endlessy. You've got to love these "explanations".
The fabric of space is not "nothing" - this is explained in other Khalili videos. Moreover, these are speculations not explanations. Yes the Universe is expanding and we don't really know how or why but we will invent a place holder - Dark Energy - so we can talk about it. Maybe rewatch the video.
@@rpprevost What??? Go look it up - I'm not spoon feeding you a complex idea like that on a YT forum. Jeezez you people are f'n' LAZY. If you cared to learn you would make your own effort and not expect other people to do your work for you. Plus your question is just so basic and banal that I have to think you are baiting me for some reason. You REALLY do not understand the difference between ENERGY and MATTER?? If not, no one can help you.
You by far have the absolute best videos, and honestly my knowledge is basic when it comes to physics, but you make it clear and easy to understand everything.
Dude! It’s so fun and interesting to see the wheels turning in such detail. Now I have to get the guitar out and give it a go. I mean that as high praise- imitation=highest flattery. I hope you feel inclined to post more soon.
Jim, as God says everything is being / is written in a book. There is your 2d storage of info. That is the holographic theory you mention. Food for thought.
@@walshamite yes, a very personable and likeable chap. I've seen other TH-cam vids on the same topics as Jim's but they're using quite long-winded and hard to follow. I watch Jim with my sons and he's able to hold their attention (which is tough these days what with children's minds being over-stimulated by tablets/phones/electronics)
This guy has made some of the best documentaries ever. I want to find the series about the evolution of the motor engine, phones, planes and something else. 4 part series used to be on netflix. The engine and aeroplane ones were awesome!
at 19:35 Jim is at Branksome Chine or Westcliff which is a beach on Poole Bay , Bournemouth SW England & one thing within this presentation which I knew without it being explained 😁
Has anyone done the two skirt experiment over time. What I mean is fire one electron, wait a day, fire another electron, wait another day, and repeat to see if the pattern repeats or if it’s less evident? What if the wave of the particle is in the ether instead of part of the particle and that’s what causes the interference. Maybe I’m nuts but I can’t seems to find anyone who’s tried it and published online. Not the best online discoverer. Let me know if anyone has an answer.
Wow first comment I've seen where someone actually asks a useful question. How things are actually discovered or truths are found out. theoretically particles are entangled for eternity like mating swans. Still should be checked. Some scientists say the more they learn the more they believe in a god. Why I'm agnostic. I'm still waiting for proof but not atheist.
This is why Einstein had a hard time accepting any of this, even called it " Spooky action ". It is counter intuitive, electrons behave wavelike until they're observed that they turn back into particles, no matter when it happens. First comment I see about the actual content of the video, and not about its production .👍
Jim Al-Khalili is taking us on a mind-bending journey through the mysteries of life, the universe, and everything! Who else is ready to expand their mind with Part 1?
Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real. If quantum mechanics hasn't profoundly shocked you, you haven't understood it yet. 🍀 Niels Bohr
Entanglement seems perhaps easy to understand. If a particle is also a wave and you grab a positive or negative part of the wave to manifest it from wave to particle, what’s left of the wave is the opposite side of the cycle. A wave starts at zero the swings off from there in one direction, but to complete the wave, it needs to return to zero then swing the opposite way as the first half. You grab the top or trough of a single wave, what’s left? The other half.
My family tree Arabia, Iraq, then migrated to Samarkand Bokhara Uzbekistan through Russian/Slavic areas, India, Pakistan, and birthplace England. Interesting regarding Iraq where Jim Al Khalili links. The qu'ran (Koran) is read and taught in Arabic. The word Alien (ferung) or outsider has many definitions .
Simplicity development, to become information is existence. I will create an imaginary parallel line, I now find it’s equidistant point, here I deform the line into an angular shape. Thus acquired transition of energy for this activation, this will give the line separate components as vectors= polarity or indicated Pole, One N. Two S .+ Direction. = “ information” -magnetic field of plasma?
"If you wind the clock back far enough, there must have been a point of Creation. " That I believe says it all. No further need to look for explanations. Creation by definition indicates that a Creator has been at work.
@dukeon 'Who created the Creator? I just rephrased your question to highlight the logical fallacy within the question. Anything that is included in the category of creation can be asked this question, but the Creator, by definition, does not fall into the category of created things. When you have exhausted the chain of causal links, you arrive at the Creator and can not proceed any further.
The two slit experiment always gets me. Electrons travel in a straight line. So unless your aim sucks, they will hit where they are aimed. How can you get a wave pattern firing at the same target? When you see a wave pattern with water, it's because you have millions of molecules of water interfering with each other. With the two slit experiment, they are firing single electrons. There's nothing for the electron to interfere with, including other electrons. It just doesn't make sense.
@@cathyzeiler9967 My objection doesn't involve quantum mechanics, as far as i can tell. I'm open to an explanation as to why my objection is irrelevant.
All matter has wave particle duality, so even an electron travels like a single wave through both slits, creating the interference pattern from the then two waves coming out of the slits
@@smokert5555 No, it can’t be explained in terms a person can understand. And yet it happens - even individual electrons (or photons, or neutrons…) interfere with themselves. But don’t think of electrons as little billiard balls, they’re just little packets of probability that can exist anywhere theoretically but “tend” to be on a main line. But they exist everywhere at once, just with rapidly diminishing probability as you move away from that line. It’s clear mathematically, but we can’t visualize it because we didn’t evolve brains that needed to, if that makes sense.
The events that we describe as the big bang brought about the universe we know today. Yet we don't know what or how brought the event on the we describe as the big bang 😢❤😅😊
Good Nice Video. So, on what basis the Universe still exist and does not go extinct? is it only because of Constsnts? speed of light, gravity constant , Plank's constant?
Wait, hold the phone. I love Jim’s stuff, but i believe he is completely wrong on something here. The ‘fuzzy’ part of the shadow around his hand is not because of the wave of light bending around his hand, it is because of mie scattering causing the light from the sun to bend when it hits large particles in oir atmosphere, causing us to see the sun, not as a very small disk, but as a much larger source of light. Basically the sun photons get deflected on their way almost like someone was holding a fuzzy magnifying lens between us and the sun. The effect is what would otherise be a shadow from a small light source(point light) which would have a very hard shadow edge, instead the sun to everyone on the surface of earth becomes a much larger area light(area light source) and thus like all wide light sources it had a penumbra in addition the umbra part of it’s shadow, and hence the hand he held up has a larger fuzzy region had the sun not had it’s light scattered by Mei scattering. Note Rayleigh scatter is responsible for the blue light and generally shorter wavelengths of sun light hitting the atmosphere being scattered to produce the blue sky we see. This in someway also messes with our shadow as it causes blue light to fill in oir shadows so they are not completely black as say they would be out in space when far away from other bouncing light from say the earth which can also cause the shadows from the sun to be partially lifted, like the shadows on the side of the international spacestation facing the earth, or sometimes the moon’s bounce light can also lift the shadows as well on the ISS when they are aligned correctly. But anyway, the point the shadow of his hand on the bricks was fuzzy not because of light bending around his hand. That does happen but it is very small, compared to the effect that the Mei scattering is having on the sun as an otherwise nearly parallel source of light rays(photons). If he held up his hand in front of a very bright tiny light source in a completely black room, it would not have a fuzzy shadow like it does in a sunny day…. Anyone else pick that up as being Jim mistaken for once?
I agree. I like Jim's videos, but it's a shame that he describes the fuzziness of the shadow as being caused by light smearing out rather than the source having a wide area. It is made worse by it being presented as "common sense". Light does to some degree smear out, but would not be detectable on the wall if the source was infinitely narrow. I still really enjoy his videos, he presents very well.
So if the universe is expanding and therefore the light of galaxies is moving further away from earth. Aren't we supposed to move together in sequence? Is earth standing still in one place? That everything (stars and galaxies) else is moving away from us?🤔
If its the fabric of space thats expanding and not the galaxy's flying away from each other how do you explain the prediction of andromeda galaxy and milky way galaxy colliding in the future???
My contribution to physics. I just thought of an experiment to prove this model. (See above) (Sounds_4_People X) Since the hydrogen atom represents one quanta of gravity, make a spherical container of a very precise amount of hydrogen, using a defined amount of elements in the sphere. Outside the ISS. First measure the gravity of the empty sphere. Second, fill it with liquid hydrogen and log the added amount of gravity. Simple. Doable. Replicable.
Every event has 4 coordinates: its location in the 3 space dimensions, and a time coordinate, too: this happened here, at that time. If it's spacetime - emphasis here on time - flowing into a black hole, the event horizon is not (just) a 2D spherical surface in 3D space, but also in time: it's a set of events in spacetime - the last events from which a signal could reach an external observer. So, in the holographic solution to the information paradox, is what we're really talking about not a "flat" "picture" of what "fell in", but a "slice" of its trajectory through spacetime? What happens to this holographic info as the event horizon shrinks as the black hole loses mass-energy, and therefore size, through Hawking Radiation? Keen to hear what people think...
Mind you not that long ago minds of the authorities of the time thought the Earth as the centre of all creation. This is somewhat true consideration of that which is known as the observable universe 😮
Information is only lost if the black hole is the only thing with the information. The information still exists if the info is shared. But if the info is only held by the black hole did it really exist in the first place. Once again the proof that connection is important.
Kazakhstan. The result is a “theory of everything” in a simple device. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, a car - using the Michelson experiment of 1881/2024, and only then the experiment would be 100% completed. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on a 100% completed Michelson experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum.
Maybe the visible matter that falls into a black hole, gets 'smashed up', only to sometime later, piece back together to its original form and exit the rear/end of the black hole into another universe?
God gave us FAITH but scientific knowledge as well 😢😢😢if we have to deal with so much stupid people, having no FAITH no belief no trust either scientific knowledge well, it means we need good inspiring skilled teachers to open their minds but their hearts as well 🎉❤🎉
That characteristc of partcules communicate instantly independet of distance, could be the solution to communicate with satélites very far in other planets. Must be investigated like radio waves and transistor were investigated years ago.
Why do physicists always fail to see that Space and Time only intersect in the context of relative motion??? Seems so obvious to me. Spacetime, the dimension of (relative) motion. Space literally means the emptiness between. Space is actually a homonym - a word with more than one core meaning. You need to differentiate - you don't. The XYZ-axis is a mathematic model, a three vector dimension for referencing (calibrating and indexing) relative spatial position. You can't curve a mathematical model. Or Space is a vague collective noun as in 'outer space' - like 'sky' is a vague, non-specific collective term - encompassing 'stuff' (matter) and the emptiness between 'stuff'. You can't curve collective nouns. And Time is also a both a dimension (we calibrate change rate and reference change-events using Time), and a vague collective noun - the only evidence of 'time passing' is change (look around you - quintillions of change-events) including the change of spatial position i.e. motion. So merge Space, the dimension of spatial position, with Time, the dimension of change, and you get Spacetime, the dimension of changing spatial position, i.e. the dimension of (relative) motion.
Einstein was wrong about time being the 4th dimension. 1st time can only be measured in one direction. I would argue that the 4th dimension is density( expansion/contraction) as the universe expands it can also contract but time is always this then that.
Spin a coin in front of a mirror then move the spinning coin awat from the nirror, this is your mysterious quantum entanglement vusuakised. its the same coin that appears to spin the opposte way instantly. The double slit is not hard to explain either
I see where you're going with this, I've noticed that the energy of a wave is just passing through the water, surfing only happens once you catch the wave of energy, and when it crashes against the shore, you can feel it escaping the water.
Maybe I am to simple. But the image of the duck is simply light standing still with that image lost in amongst all the other images of matter falling into the black hole The duck can only be compressed to a point not broken into pieces all that matter after being compressed to it's maximum density to my mind obviously returns to the energy that created the particles that made the atoms with that energy being radiated from the black hole And obviously that energy radiated is then available for the recreation of the subatomic particles that create the atoms that create matter But of course this statement will be lost to the internet
My point is not the meanings. Plank's quantum is calculated as h to an exact no. I have not come across anyone applying it to a photon, WHICH I THOUGHT was coined be Einstein. Plank used the smallest quantity to explain the anamaly of, I think, color of light vs temperature. I just was confusedthe word quanta used instead of Photon by Mr J Al K
Why don't you guys go up in outer space and video record in x-ray, UV, and any other part of the spectrum we can't see with out naked eyes and show it to the public? The people deserve the right to know just how bizarre our universe really is.
I don't believe the holographic thing. When you watch a video on a 2D screen, it looks 3D, but when an object goes behind another its information is stored back on a chip only. Not stored on the screen. Only storage on the screen is its amount of pixels. The chip has more storage than the screen. Back to where does it go?
Why would we be holograms in the holographic theory. All it says is that we are two dimensional at our core and I think we will eventually get to one dimension and discover that the entire universe is just a particle. We are all one.
Kind of like before the big bang. ( The quantum World unmeasurable, behind a curtain .). No sold reality excited be for the big bang. The big bang is a metaphor only . Any electon only took place after the cosmic microwave event. The universe was only quantum before the metaphorical event. 😅😢Is antimatter the potential for reality but was the product of matter that travelled faster than the speed of light and dematerialized 😢 can quantum mechanics explain antigravity, entanglement and people in crouching Tiger hidden Dragon defying physics? 😅
Regarding the spinning coin and due to quantum entanglement..... when the "buck coin" stops being both heads & tails the money in my bank account disappears.... damn you physics!!! 😂
Science cannot answer these types of questions. It gives us the what, but never the why. When a scientist cannot explain what gravity is, what energy is and be able to measure the actual speed of light, then it still cannot explain why we are here.
Human being has not evolved to that skilled capability to see or observe the ultimate facts of the universe intricacies and even to be able to observe the nature of elementary particles entirely and even don't know why ..... I understand the dark matter is in another dimension may be that's the reason we are not capable to see but as I am not sure of our mind capability so this may be incorrect too.
Jim is my favourite science communicator since Carl Sagan.
carl sagan was open to every culture
i like his presentation along with Brian Cox. Both are very animated.
Jim is fantastic!
Totally agree.
Carl Sagan spoke a weird form of English but was insightful and entertaining .
I can't get enough of these kind of programs, even though they sometimes leave my head spinning afterwards.
Ditto.
that's what she said
Try history of the universe. Brilliant
I hear you man. 👍
It seems to me (judging by the graphic depiction) that when we finally understand why these strange phenomena occur the wavelike illustration used might also describe and/or lead to scientists understanding force fields, magnetism for example. Awkward, I know, but the poorly defined path of the quantum looks like a field, not a lot of individual particles.
It is the fisrt time that I see Jim Al-Khalili, I’ve been following his Life Scientific podcast on bbc radio4 since 2018 my IELTS preparation time. I wanna thank mr. Jim Al-Khalili and his podcast guests for that amazing show.
Thank god for the BBC making docs like this, if it wasn't for BBC Horizon docs like this one or Professor Brian Cox and Sir David Attenborough there would be nothing intelligent left on TV
Thank you all British subjects for paying your telly taxes so us in the Commonwealth colonies can still soak up the culture of our mother country. From Canada.
I find it repulsive that you praise the work of Cox and Attenborough, you credit the BBC for availing their work, and you thank an invisible mythical being for making it all possible. Perhaps one day the BBC will air a program to demonstrate where you went wrong.
Productions like this are priceless in the fight against the anti-science movements.
Yes, but they produce an over whelming amount of woke nonsense also and are completely left wing biased.
@@chriscarrol9373 the culture of the mother country is disappearing very fast
This guy's videos are the best.
there are not his! and do not praise the person but the content!
For all narrator Jim voice makes me interested in the universe...he explain the topic clearly and simple.
The voice makes this presentation very good!
Seen all these when they were on TV. Jim is superb at these documentaries. This is the kind of content I approve of on TH-cam. Leave the short form - non educational content to other apps for those with no attention spans.
We don’t care what you approve of. We can’t all live by your own standards or personal attention span.
@@MegaLmae I think you'll find a lot do agree with my statement, just ask anybody with a brain and wasn't born in the 2000's. You cared enough to comment, heyyyyy 👋🏻
@@KingBritish You are just an intolerant old git.
This is A Stellar Episode 😎👍
Profoundly beautifull! Thank you all for this amazing documentary! May the force be with you 🙏
So, the "fabric" of space itself, in between the galaxies, is what is expanding. And what is this fabric made of? Nothing. "The universe itself, in it's entirety, is getting bigger" -So, its endlessness is getting even more endlessy. You've got to love these "explanations".
The fabric of space is not "nothing" - this is explained in other Khalili videos. Moreover, these are speculations not explanations. Yes the Universe is expanding and we don't really know how or why but we will invent a place holder - Dark Energy - so we can talk about it.
Maybe rewatch the video.
@@kaoskronostyche9939 I thought it was "dark matter."
@@kaoskronostyche9939 That's strange. I still see your comment. Anyway, you made a reference to "dark energy". Is that different than dark matter?
@@rpprevost What???
Go look it up - I'm not spoon feeding you a complex idea like that on a YT forum. Jeezez you people are f'n' LAZY. If you cared to learn you would make your own effort and not expect other people to do your work for you.
Plus your question is just so basic and banal that I have to think you are baiting me for some reason.
You REALLY do not understand the difference between ENERGY and MATTER??
If not, no one can help you.
@@rpprevostit is. I dont understand it very well, myself. But they ARE different.
You by far have the absolute best videos, and honestly my knowledge is basic when it comes to physics, but you make it clear and easy to understand everything.
That's not true at all, this person on the channel is stealing videos from old cable TV that works and then posting them
This was a BBC Horizon documentary not made be the TH-camr just uploaded
Im a complicated creature, i see Jim-Al-Khalil i click.
Hopefully one day he'll release a video about grammar and punctuation for complicated creatures to click.
Same for me, as soon as I see his name or face, I’m watching it!
Dude! It’s so fun and interesting to see the wheels turning in such detail. Now I have to get the guitar out and give it a go. I mean that as high praise- imitation=highest flattery. I hope you feel inclined to post more soon.
Very wonderful lecture like all the others;especially well understood when accompanied by classical music.
These quantum physics videos are easy to follow & fascinating! I mean easy to follow and then contemplate then watch again!
❤Thank you very much publisher for this excellent program. Thank you Jim excellent presentation
Jim is my favourite science comunicator since❤❤
Jim, as God says everything is being / is written in a book. There is your 2d storage of info. That is the holographic theory you mention. Food for thought.
Thought would swiftly starve on _that_ "diet."
I love your content sir. Every night I watch 1 or 2 videos . 👏🏻
What if there was hair on the sun? It still hasnt been explained.
Jim seems the kind of guy you would like to have a beer with and discuss things. Of course, if it was me, it would be very one-sided.
Me too, I also would be a gob smacked listener
Amazing documentary!
Top man Jim!
Agreed, Jim is a top man. He never betrays a shred of personal ego.
@@walshamite yes, a very personable and likeable chap. I've seen other TH-cam vids on the same topics as Jim's but they're using quite long-winded and hard to follow. I watch Jim with my sons and he's able to hold their attention (which is tough these days what with children's minds being over-stimulated by tablets/phones/electronics)
This is good stuff.
Helps me to stand in awe of creation and its enigmas. And how were endowed with the gift of understanding. Amazing and awesome.
This guy has made some of the best documentaries ever.
I want to find the series about the evolution of the motor engine, phones, planes and something else. 4 part series used to be on netflix. The engine and aeroplane ones were awesome!
Best science communicator since Sagan
Jim is excellent amazing video
No no no and I'm pissed that they took away the good documentaries that featured dick rodstein
at 19:35 Jim is at Branksome Chine or Westcliff which is a beach on Poole Bay , Bournemouth SW England & one thing within this presentation which I knew without it being explained 😁
thank you fantastic, holograms , wow, look forward to the next one 👍
Has anyone done the two skirt experiment over time. What I mean is fire one electron, wait a day, fire another electron, wait another day, and repeat to see if the pattern repeats or if it’s less evident?
What if the wave of the particle is in the ether instead of part of the particle and that’s what causes the interference. Maybe I’m nuts but I can’t seems to find anyone who’s tried it and published online. Not the best online discoverer. Let me know if anyone has an answer.
Wow first comment I've seen where someone actually asks a useful question. How things are actually discovered or truths are found out. theoretically particles are entangled for eternity like mating swans. Still should be checked. Some scientists say the more they learn the more they believe in a god. Why I'm agnostic. I'm still waiting for proof but not atheist.
This is why Einstein had a hard time accepting any of this, even called it " Spooky action ". It is counter intuitive, electrons behave wavelike until they're observed that they turn back into particles, no matter when it happens.
First comment I see about the actual content of the video, and not about its production .👍
38:00 - 😆 😄 The Ceramic duck has everyone puzzled in comparison to the singularity paradox
Jim Al-Khalili is taking us on a mind-bending journey through the mysteries of life, the universe, and everything! Who else is ready to expand their mind with Part 1?
Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real. If quantum mechanics hasn't profoundly shocked you, you haven't understood it yet.
🍀
Niels Bohr
Wow it's possible We are 2D but living in a 3D constructed environment/ Space and Time is absolutely mind blowing
Entanglement seems perhaps easy to understand. If a particle is also a wave and you grab a positive or negative part of the wave to manifest it from wave to particle, what’s left of the wave is the opposite side of the cycle.
A wave starts at zero the swings off from there in one direction, but to complete the wave, it needs to return to zero then swing the opposite way as the first half.
You grab the top or trough of a single wave, what’s left? The other half.
Great program thank you.
Always makes the subject interesting, good on yer JA-K👌🥇👍
My family tree Arabia, Iraq, then migrated to Samarkand Bokhara Uzbekistan through Russian/Slavic areas, India, Pakistan, and birthplace England. Interesting regarding Iraq where Jim Al Khalili links. The qu'ran (Koran) is read and taught in Arabic. The word Alien (ferung) or outsider has many definitions .
Simplicity development, to become information is existence. I will create an imaginary parallel line, I now find it’s equidistant point, here I deform the line into an angular shape. Thus acquired transition of energy for this activation, this will give the line separate components as vectors= polarity or indicated Pole, One N. Two S .+ Direction. = “ information” -magnetic field of plasma?
at the bands of light and dark bit there's a banger jesus!
not just particles displaying a wave like function god damn, get kendrick on that beat
I love this great man
❤
Shout out to “Hitch Hikers Guide” reference 😊
"If you wind the clock back far enough, there must have been a point of Creation. "
That I believe says it all. No further need to look for explanations. Creation by definition indicates that a Creator has been at work.
How was the creator created? You haven’t solved the problem you’ve just inserted a middleman.
@dukeon 'Who created the Creator? I just rephrased your question to highlight the logical fallacy within the question.
Anything that is included in the category of creation can be asked this question, but the Creator, by definition, does not fall into the category of created things.
When you have exhausted the chain of causal links, you arrive at the Creator and can not proceed any further.
The two slit experiment always gets me. Electrons travel in a straight line. So unless your aim sucks, they will hit where they are aimed. How can you get a wave pattern firing at the same target?
When you see a wave pattern with water, it's because you have millions of molecules of water interfering with each other. With the two slit experiment, they are firing single electrons. There's nothing for the electron to interfere with, including other electrons. It just doesn't make sense.
Nothing about Quantum Mechanics makes sense. That's why it's so fascinating.
@@cathyzeiler9967 My objection doesn't involve quantum mechanics, as far as i can tell. I'm open to an explanation as to why my objection is irrelevant.
All matter has wave particle duality, so even an electron travels like a single wave through both slits, creating the interference pattern from the then two waves coming out of the slits
@@galeforce69420 One electron interferes with itself? Can you explain that?
@@smokert5555 No, it can’t be explained in terms a person can understand. And yet it happens - even individual electrons (or photons, or neutrons…) interfere with themselves. But don’t think of electrons as little billiard balls, they’re just little packets of probability that can exist anywhere theoretically but “tend” to be on a main line. But they exist everywhere at once, just with rapidly diminishing probability as you move away from that line. It’s clear mathematically, but we can’t visualize it because we didn’t evolve brains that needed to, if that makes sense.
The events that we describe as the big bang brought about the universe we know today. Yet we don't know what or how brought the event on the we describe as the big bang 😢❤😅😊
Such a good video 📹
Good Nice Video. So, on what basis the Universe still exist and does not go extinct? is it only because of Constsnts? speed of light, gravity constant , Plank's constant?
Wait, hold the phone. I love Jim’s stuff, but i believe he is completely wrong on something here.
The ‘fuzzy’ part of the shadow around his hand is not because of the wave of light bending around his hand, it is because of mie scattering causing the light from the sun to bend when it hits large particles in oir atmosphere, causing us to see the sun, not as a very small disk, but as a much larger source of light. Basically the sun photons get deflected on their way almost like someone was holding a fuzzy magnifying lens between us and the sun. The effect is what would otherise be a shadow from a small light source(point light) which would have a very hard shadow edge, instead the sun to everyone on the surface of earth becomes a much larger area light(area light source) and thus like all wide light sources it had a penumbra in addition the umbra part of it’s shadow, and hence the hand he held up has a larger fuzzy region had the sun not had it’s light scattered by Mei scattering. Note Rayleigh scatter is responsible for the blue light and generally shorter wavelengths of sun light hitting the atmosphere being scattered to produce the blue sky we see. This in someway also messes with our shadow as it causes blue light to fill in oir shadows so they are not completely black as say they would be out in space when far away from other bouncing light from say the earth which can also cause the shadows from the sun to be partially lifted, like the shadows on the side of the international spacestation facing the earth, or sometimes the moon’s bounce light can also lift the shadows as well on the ISS when they are aligned correctly.
But anyway, the point the shadow of his hand on the bricks was fuzzy not because of light bending around his hand. That does happen but it is very small, compared to the effect that the Mei scattering is having on the sun as an otherwise nearly parallel source of light rays(photons).
If he held up his hand in front of a very bright tiny light source in a completely black room, it would not have a fuzzy shadow like it does in a sunny day….
Anyone else pick that up as being Jim mistaken for once?
I agree. I like Jim's videos, but it's a shame that he describes the fuzziness of the shadow as being caused by light smearing out rather than the source having a wide area. It is made worse by it being presented as "common sense". Light does to some degree smear out, but would not be detectable on the wall if the source was infinitely narrow. I still really enjoy his videos, he presents very well.
So if the universe is expanding and therefore the light of galaxies is moving further away from earth. Aren't we supposed to move together in sequence? Is earth standing still in one place? That everything (stars and galaxies) else is moving away from us?🤔
Love Jim!
If its the fabric of space thats expanding and not the galaxy's flying away from each other how do you explain the prediction of andromeda galaxy and milky way galaxy colliding in the future???
My contribution to physics.
I just thought of an experiment to prove this model. (See above) (Sounds_4_People X)
Since the hydrogen atom represents one quanta of gravity, make a spherical container of a very precise amount of hydrogen, using a defined amount of elements in the sphere.
Outside the ISS.
First measure the gravity of the empty sphere.
Second, fill it with liquid hydrogen and log the added amount of gravity.
Simple. Doable. Replicable.
Every event has 4 coordinates: its location in the 3 space dimensions, and a time coordinate, too: this happened here, at that time. If it's spacetime - emphasis here on time - flowing into a black hole, the event horizon is not (just) a 2D spherical surface in 3D space, but also in time: it's a set of events in spacetime - the last events from which a signal could reach an external observer. So, in the holographic solution to the information paradox, is what we're really talking about not a "flat" "picture" of what "fell in", but a "slice" of its trajectory through spacetime? What happens to this holographic info as the event horizon shrinks as the black hole loses mass-energy, and therefore size, through Hawking Radiation? Keen to hear what people think...
As space expands, is more matter being created , or is the amount of matter fixed as after the big bang ?
Mind you not that long ago minds of the authorities of the time thought the Earth as the centre of all creation. This is somewhat true consideration of that which is known as the observable universe 😮
Lovely video
Information is only lost if the black hole is the only thing with the information. The information still exists if the info is shared. But if the info is only held by the black hole did it really exist in the first place.
Once again the proof that connection is important.
Kazakhstan.
The result is a “theory of everything” in a simple device.
Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, a car - using the Michelson experiment of 1881/2024, and only then the experiment would be 100% completed. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on a 100% completed Michelson experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum.
Maybe the visible matter that falls into a black hole, gets 'smashed up', only to sometime later, piece back together to its original form and exit the rear/end of the black hole into another universe?
It seems like we're not really certain about time being the 4th dimension.
I wish he had told us to put some UV glasses on too, that light almost blinded me
30:00 “Shut up and calculate “ 😂
God gave us FAITH but scientific knowledge as well 😢😢😢if we have to deal with so much stupid people, having no FAITH no belief no trust either scientific knowledge well, it means we need good inspiring skilled teachers to open their minds but their hearts as well 🎉❤🎉
An open mind is not one that believes in supernatural agency. That requires denial of reality and therefore demonstrates a closed mind.
That characteristc of partcules communicate instantly independet of distance, could be the solution to communicate with satélites very far in other planets. Must be investigated like radio waves and transistor were investigated years ago.
Its great stuff, really understanding it though mmm it's quantum theoretical
Why do physicists always fail to see that Space and Time only intersect in the context of relative motion??? Seems so obvious to me. Spacetime, the dimension of (relative) motion.
Space literally means the emptiness between. Space is actually a homonym - a word with more than one core meaning. You need to differentiate - you don't. The XYZ-axis is a mathematic model, a three vector dimension for referencing (calibrating and indexing) relative spatial position. You can't curve a mathematical model.
Or Space is a vague collective noun as in 'outer space' - like 'sky' is a vague, non-specific collective term - encompassing 'stuff' (matter) and the emptiness between 'stuff'. You can't curve collective nouns.
And Time is also a both a dimension (we calibrate change rate and reference change-events using Time), and a vague collective noun - the only evidence of 'time passing' is change (look around you - quintillions of change-events) including the change of spatial position i.e. motion.
So merge Space, the dimension of spatial position, with Time, the dimension of change, and you get Spacetime, the dimension of changing spatial position, i.e. the dimension of (relative) motion.
Einstein was wrong about time being the 4th dimension. 1st time can only be measured in one direction.
I would argue that the 4th dimension is density( expansion/contraction) as the universe expands it can also contract but time is always this then that.
Time is easily seen as a dimension. Try to meet someone in three dimensional space without it.
I thought light particles are called photons!
And quanta was word coined by Plank for energy.
Am I wrong?
Light is a form of energy. It behaves as a quantum particle (photon) and as a wave, depending on how you measure it.
Its not science that leads to my frustration, its economics
When did this originally get aired? 2007?
It aired in 2022
Spin a coin in front of a mirror then move the spinning coin awat from the nirror, this is your mysterious quantum entanglement vusuakised. its the same coin that appears to spin the opposte way instantly. The double slit is not hard to explain either
Do you,Jim, study Crop Circles ? Dimensions indeed...
I'm trying to understand!
Here's looking at Euclid.
this is just excellent! many thanks!
isn't water also "wave" in ocean and "particle" like droplets dropping off Tap water?
I see where you're going with this, I've noticed that the energy of a wave is just passing through the water, surfing only happens once you catch the wave of energy, and when it crashes against the shore, you can feel it escaping the water.
Any chance of dropping the music
This shit is my jam!!! Hell yeaaa go physics.
It seems most likely that our universe itself is alive.
Not many people born in Iraq are named Jim 😊
Jameel
Never trust anyone who wrote a guide to life, the universe, and everything.
Before the big bang was quantum mechanics and the primordial make-up of a dense prime-niverse. 😅
Maybe I am to simple. But the image of the duck is simply light standing still with that image lost in amongst all the other images of matter falling into the black hole
The duck can only be compressed to a point not broken into pieces all that matter after being compressed to it's maximum density to my mind obviously returns to the energy that created the particles that made the atoms with that energy being radiated from the black hole
And obviously that energy radiated is then available for the recreation of the subatomic particles that create the atoms that create matter
But of course this statement will be lost to the internet
We don't know, there saved you some local time 👍
My point is not the meanings. Plank's quantum is calculated as h to an exact no. I have not come across anyone applying it to a photon, WHICH I THOUGHT was coined be Einstein. Plank used the smallest quantity to explain the anamaly of, I think, color of light vs temperature.
I just was confusedthe word quanta used instead of Photon by Mr J Al K
Do not open the bonnet! Enjoy the ride. Let us leave in harmony and cherish the world God gave us.
Got to check the oil level now and again.
Hey aziz. Please do a vid where u are showing all your musckes and holding a metal ball.
❤️🙏❤️
Why don't you guys go up in outer space and video record in x-ray, UV, and any other part of the spectrum we can't see with out naked eyes and show it to the public? The people deserve the right to know just how bizarre our universe really is.
Why do I feel like I’m some kind of mistake
Me too. Still trying to find my place/meaning in this world. I am 64 years. Oops!
Like we're recorded on a CD or a DVD and someone is playing us for their entertainment
I always knew that I was being played…..
I don't believe the holographic thing. When you watch a video on a 2D screen, it looks 3D, but when an object goes behind another its information is stored back on a chip only. Not stored on the screen. Only storage on the screen is its amount of pixels. The chip has more storage than the screen. Back to where does it go?
I don't think you've grasped what they meant by the holographic thing. Screens and chips have nothing to do with it
@johnlonkert7187 no I don't. And neither do they
@johnlonkert7187 so do you understand the math? Because they are the ones that made the comparison. So let them know that they can't do that.
Why would we be holograms in the holographic theory. All it says is that we are two dimensional at our core and I think we will eventually get to one dimension and discover that the entire universe is just a particle. We are all one.
I can't understand why old video back to back uploaded
This is my new sleeping show..
I listen as I drift to sleep to nothingness..
Kind of like before the big bang. ( The quantum World unmeasurable, behind a curtain .). No sold reality excited be for the big bang. The big bang is a metaphor only . Any electon only took place after the cosmic microwave event. The universe was only quantum before the metaphorical event. 😅😢Is antimatter the potential for reality but was the product of matter that travelled faster than the speed of light and dematerialized 😢 can quantum mechanics explain antigravity, entanglement and people in crouching Tiger hidden Dragon defying physics? 😅
If a black hole evaporates away to nothing, then the is no longer an event horizon, no?
Regarding the spinning coin and due to quantum entanglement..... when the "buck coin" stops being both heads & tails the money in my bank account disappears.... damn you physics!!! 😂
I thought that eney matter going down a black hole comes out the other End. You know what I mean it doesn't stay in the black hole
Science cannot answer these types of questions. It gives us the what, but never the why. When a scientist cannot explain what gravity is, what energy is and be able to measure the actual speed of light, then it still cannot explain why we are here.
Human being has not evolved to that skilled capability to see or observe the ultimate facts of the universe intricacies and even to be able to observe the nature of elementary particles entirely and even don't know why ..... I understand the dark matter is in another dimension may be that's the reason we are not capable to see but as I am not sure of our mind capability so this may be incorrect too.