I hate myself for sleeping these past months and not studying, today is my AP exam and I'm really here.... EDit: This is the first time getting over 200 likes in less than a day im concerned now for y'all. Also I failed good luck you guys
jirido oh and how much time do we have to answer the multiple choice and how many multiple choice questions will there be? How much time will we wave to answer the free response questions and how many free response questions will there be?
you sir are the reason I got a 5 on my gov exam!!! I just wanted to come back and say thank you. you’re truly an angel for taking the time to make these videos 🙏
shout out to those here in 2021 preparing for an actual full exam. anyways, here's my thesis statement: Extensive government surveillance systems violate a persons privacy based on the decision made in Roe vs. Wade, especially when increased due to fear.
Thank you for this, I can’t believe the exam is on Monday. I’m taking 6 exams this year, but I’m confident I’ll pass 3 of them. The others are Government, English and Macroeconomics. But thanks to this I feel more prepared! Thank you! I’m
FRQ thesis: Although it is sometimes necessary for the government to heighten their duties during times of duress, the governmental evidence powerfully demonstrates that government surveillance programs such as the one conducted following the 9/11 attacks are a violation of indiviual rights in direct contrast to the 4th amendment and the 14th amendment implied right to privacy. edit: I just started cramming with only 9 days left to go, so I hope this is a good start!!
Yea I just started cramming with less than 13 hours to go (8 of which I will be sleeping for) but your thesis looks good, only thing is my Gov teacher told me by using two separate amendments, the evidence would both technically count as the constitution and therefore would only be counted as 1 piece of evidence. Not sure how reliable that is but yea!
While surveillance programs may infringe upon people's right to privacy, they ultimately uphold people's natural rights rather than violating them. This is an example of social contract, the idea that the purpose of government is to protect the people at the expense of some of their individual freedom.
This probably works. Given the argument you're making I would simply it and try to avoid admitting that it infringes on people's right to privacy. Try "Surveillance programs uphold people's natural rights rather than violating them and exemplify the social contract, the idea that the purpose of government is to protect the rights of the people."
I think this one will work normally, but this year the new rubric takes away the requirements for a concession paragraph. I watched a video in which the CollegeBoard US Gov. chief reader commented on different thesis statements, and when he saw one example that includes a counterargument, he said that it wouldn't earn the point (this year).
This is just an argument (I don't necessarily believe this but this was the easiest for me to prove): Government surveillance programs would not violate individual rights as a result of the "necessary and proper" clause in the Constitution that allows for the federal government to temporarily limit individual freedoms for national security purposes. Would this work?
Thesis: Government surveillance programs violate individual's rights since they impose on an individual's right to privacy and would be considered "unreasonable search and seizure" under the 4th amendment since the individual would not be aware of the use of their technological information by the government. Is this good or could I improve it in some way? Also, thank you for your videos! I learned ap govt last semester so it's been stressful relearning all the content for the ap exam but your videos have helped a lot.
I am so grateful for your videos! I have learned more in this one playlist than in my entire year of AP Government and Politics class. Thank you so much for taking the time to help us prepare for the exam!!
My thesis: Government surveillence programs do not violate individual rights because the government does this to fulfill some of its most essential obligations: to protect the peoples' natural right to life, to ensure domestic tranquility, and to provide for the common defense, as these duties are outlined in the Constitution and Declaration of Independence
MR LA MANNA, I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT I GOT A 5 ON MY AP GOV EXAM THIS YEAT BECAUSE OF YOUR VIDEOS! I kid you not, I never touched my any of my gov textbooks once, and my teacher mostly gave us a self-study route for that class. While just following your videos throughout the semester, by the time of the AP test I didn’t do any additional studying, but I got that 5!
I made a short, and broad thesis. I am wondering I will get the point for the thesis. Here it is: Government surveillance does not violate individual rights because this program helps protect public interest.
its almost 1 am the day of the exam :) love this coronavirus affecting my studies severely :) but on a serious note, thank you so much Carey for these videos. at least they give me hope and actually teach me!
Although increased surveillance may strengthen public safety precautions it expands federal power beyond what is delineated in the constitution and beyond what is granted by the elastic clause by violating the fourth amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure. How is this? Also thank you, my class is still learning about the bureaucracy and we haven't started reviewing yet so this is so helpful!
the answer is c. categorical grant because Congress is giving the states money but only if they comply with the rule of establishing federal education standards
My AP Government teacher, Ms. Pomerleau, said for every 5 slaves, 3 count, not that slaves are 3/5ths of a person. It is written 3 out of 5, not 3/5ths.
Just a quick note for the block grants and categorical grants you forget to add the definition on categorical grants on it, it just stayed as block grants.
This is my first AP test and I am still getting the hang of writing arguments... Government surveillance programs violate individual rights because according to the 14th amendment every citizen has the right to privacy, and the surveillance programs go against a person having privacy.
You sound like a pro already! Great job. Small thing: no single amendment establishes the right to privacy, so I'd leave the 14th amendment part out, but otherwise it's perfect
Thesis: Government surveillance programs violate individual rights because of the violation of privacy rights to individual citizens given by the fourteenth amendment and the violation of the search and arrest procedures under the 4th amendment. Would that thesis earn a point?
10:27 answer is D. The federal government will give money to the states to purchase things for a specific purpose ONLY if .they participate in the program. So I could see C. but I believe D. is the best choice
I believe c because a federal mandate is a law that all states must follow. This law only offers them money if they follow, thus making it a categorical grant as the money goes under education purposes. A federal mandate is a law that no matter what they must follow, funded or not.
thesis : Although there is a need for better security features, without probable clause unreasonable searches are against the 4th amendment of the constitution, in this case government surveillance programs violate individual rights since there is no probable clause behind each individual being recorded with in their rights. please answer
Although some may find government surveillance to be necessary, It violates the 4th Amendment’s right of privacy and infringes on individual rights while also strengthening the power of the federal government.
I think I noticed a mistake in this video, Mr. LaManna. Around 10:13, the definition for a Categorical Grant isn't on screen. It's the same as the Block Grants.
The Bill of Rights, particularly Amendments 1 and 4 of the United States constitution, detail the natural rights of citizens to, respectively, exercise their "freedom of speech" as well as their right to be "secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects." Government surveillance programs, especially ones discreet in nature and in purpose, threaten and potentially violate these notions outlined in the constitution.
Government surveillance programs do violate individual's rights because it would infringe upon the people's right to privacy incorporated by the 14th Amendment. Would that be alright or is it only correct if I also mention the 4th amendment?
How is this? Although Surveillance programs are intended to protect against foreign threats and protect citizen life, the 14th amendment guarantees protection against unreasonable search and seizures, and, therefore, such programs are a violation of natural rights. I'm so grateful for this as this is my first AP. Being an international student, You have made it much easier.
Government surveillance programs are meant to protect the people from acts of terror. However, programs involving mass surveillance do infringe on the rights of the people, specifically, their 4th Amendment right to privacy as stated in the Bill of Rights.
Government surveillance programs do not violate individual rights. Rather, they display an increase in federal power which is supported by Federalist 10 and by the founding fathers' initial purpose for federalism.
Also congress could actually tax, but taxation or anything for that matter couldn’t be enforced. Which is also why no one showed up to the states conventions.
Can you help me with this I don’t know how to write a good thesis : Equality of opportunity is a central value in the American political system. Choose either Congress or the Supreme Court, and present an argument for why your choice is most responsible for advancing the principle of equality of opportunity in the United States.
Hey Colin, so you have to to do two things: make a claim and establish a line of reasoning. So you need to say that either Congress or the Supreme Court is most responsible blah blah and then say BECAUSE and establish a line of reasoning. Your because can be really simple, it's not actually a piece of evidence but you need to give some kind of reason why you selected the one that you did.
For your categorical grants slide, you said the right definition but wrote the wrong one in the video.. But thanks for these videos in general, my class has been using them all year!
Although the proclaimed intent of government surveillance programs is to protect citizens from the threat of terrorism, the violation of individual rights and privacy is unconstitutional and goes directly against the fourth and ninth amendment, which are the right against unreasonable searches and the unenumerated rights of the people, respectively. (Megan Audette, period 7)
for the thesis, I noticed that a lot of people start by saying although surveillance programs are good for protecting ur nation or managing security, they violate individual rights because ... Does our thesis have to be complex or present a counterpoint since they removed the complexity point? can't we just say surveillance programs violate individual rights because ...
You absolutely can. There's no need to acknowledge an alternate perspective or the purpose of those programs. You can get right to the claim: Government surveillance programs violate individual rights because...
Governmental surveillance programs do not violate individual rights because the programs don't violate any of the natural rights outlined in the constitution, nor do they violate any of the rights given amendments to the constitution. The programs do not violate the 4th amendment because they have to go through the FISA courts in order to get a search warrant and these courts determine if there is probable cause for a search. How's this? (I know im wordy I can't help it)
Government surveillance programs do violate individual rights because of the 4th Amendment’s right to privacy, and the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of due process.
Although events such as 9/11 cause proper reasoning for government surveillance programs to be established, such programs would mostly serve to impede individual rights. Established programs such as these would blatantly go against the 4th Amendments right to privacy.
Can you give me some feedback on my thesis? Some Americans think that increasing federal power in order to combat terrorism violates individual rights, however such an increase is a necessary sacrifice to allow the government to protect the citizens from harm.
It's not bad. I'd encourage you to explicitly state that it's NOT a violation of individual rights.I might reword what you wrote to "Increasing federal power in order to combat terrorism does not violate individual rights and is a necessary sacrifice to allow the government to protect the citizens from harm.
Thesis: Government surveillance programs would violate individual rights because it would go against citizen's privacy and rights in order to achieve a form of stability.
How would this be for my thesis? Government surveillance programs violate individual rights because they violate the 4th amendment which talks about prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures.
I can argue that government surveillance programs do not violate individual right because it is important to make sure that we have a way to defend against terrorism
Robin Klos because the states don’t have to participate in the program. They aren’t forced to do anything by the federal govt and the government is proving money for a pretty specific purpose ($50 mil for buying new technology) so the best answer would be categorical grant.
Is the answer C because while block grants are a broad area, giving money for technology specifically in the classroom would be categorical grants so C?
Is this good? I never learned how to properly write a thesis statement in class. Government surveillance programs violate individual rights because the 4th amendment states that without a warrant no one is allowed to forcibly enter another persons home. Although keeping the nation safe is everyones top priority we need to take into consideration people's individual rights along with the 4th amendment.
Yes! You would earn the thesis point. You actually had the point after just the first sentence. There's no need to elaborate beyond that. Make a claim and establish a line of reasoning, you did it in the first sentence. Good job
While the debate hangs over the concept of freedom and safety, the government usage of surveillance programs do violate the right to privacy as stated in the 4th Amendment.
While some Americans believe that individual rights and privacy are important societal regulations, it would be increasingly beneficial for the government to have the rights of surveillance. It would protect the nation as a whole, combat foreign threats, and strengthen the republic, which weakens factions.
Good. I think you should explicitly state that the surveillance does NOT violate people's rights. It's clearly implied, but my advice is to be as specific to the prompt as possible
Government surveillance programs do not violate individual rights as information willingly posted on social media platforms has changed the meaning of reasonable expectation of privacy.
Could you tell me if this thesis is alright? I'm wondering if my line of reasoning is truly a good reasoning: Government surveillance programs, while an effective method to protect Americans, violate individual rights because they are an invasion of privacy and protections set forth in the Bill of Rights. Also, for the multiple choice, is the answer D (a federal mandate)? I was debating between C & D because can't grants have mandates attached to them? So isn't it technically both? Categorical grants have a more specific purpose, in this case, new classroom technology. Please explain... By the way thanks for these videos. The fact that when I watch them, I feel like I understand everything and already knew the information, I feel more relieved. :]
The thesis/line of reasoning is perfect. MC answer is C. It's not a federal mandate because states have the option to say no. They' only have to meet the requirements if they want to get the money, so that's conditions of aid for a categorical grant. Mandates are somethings states MUST do regardless of whether there's money offered or not.
@@CareyLaManna Ohh, alright. That does make sense. And Categorical (project) grants are based on merit, I guess that's the requirement in terms of merit in this case. Does that mean mandates never come with grants? I know that the No Child Left Behind Act is an example of a mandate. But also, for example, cross-cutting requirements (I believe that's what it's called), when they had to change the drinking age to get highway funds. What would that be considered? A (categorical) grant with a requirement, or just a mandate? Thanks for replying, and sorry for the long response I just want to understand everything I'm confused about.
When a 13 minute video teaches you more than your gov teacher taught you in one semester
clorox bleach 6.5 minutes because 2x.
** in a whole 4 semesters (not sure if to count the fourth cause quarantine but oh well XD)
haha *the entire school year
Was gonna like this comment but it's at 420
RIGHT did you take the exam already?
all of us here the day of the exam... today’s off to a great start lol
- a Dont call me out like that 😭
Megan me rn lol
I hate myself for sleeping these past months and not studying, today is my AP exam and I'm really here....
EDit: This is the first time getting over 200 likes in less than a day im concerned now for y'all. Also I failed good luck you guys
same RIP
Same
SAME
The boat may be sinking, but we're all here together. Good luck you guys
HAHHA same
C, a categorical grant
Thank you
I'm literally so grateful for this. This is my first AP exam and it just so happens to be the most whacked up one. Thank you thank you thank you!!
No problem!! Glad to help!
Carey LaManna quick question: so is fed.10 in favor of federalist or anti federalist?
@@davidkeith6907 all federalists papers are in favor of federalist
jirido just realized that was a dumb question🤦🏿♂️ Thankyou
jirido oh and how much time do we have to answer the multiple choice and how many multiple choice questions will there be? How much time will we wave to answer the free response questions and how many free response questions will there be?
This dude literally taught me more than my teacher has in a whole school year.
Everything i know is from APUSH, AP lang, or this guy 😭
Same honestly
I get that feeling heavily. My AP Gov teacher ain’t bad but she wastes time in class. Unlike this guy.
Dang my ap test is in 2 days I haven’t studied at all...
That's why I am here. Mine is tommorrow lol.
Hi
@@MS-ez8sm same!!!
Same!! I’ve been binging his videos all day
just started studying lol
* binges of all of your videos 2 days before the exam & prays for the best *
Victoria Gonzalez I’m doing it right now.
@@RP-tp1ct same
Corona Gang
BohemianBella pumping all the info into my brain kinda hurts ngl
@@Dava__ We're in it together
you sir are the reason I got a 5 on my gov exam!!! I just wanted to come back and say thank you. you’re truly an angel for taking the time to make these videos 🙏
@@Pipecat3 aww thank u so muchh!! 😊
do you know why good study tips and websites? if so please respond!!!
not me watching this the night before the exam and realising that I have to write an argument essay
Me either haha can’t be me
how did it go haha
I love the format of the blue text boxes, it makes note taking so easy and simple yet full of all the important info :) great video!
shout out to those here in 2021 preparing for an actual full exam. anyways, here's my thesis statement:
Extensive government surveillance systems violate a persons privacy based on the decision made in Roe vs. Wade, especially when increased due to fear.
Hi Carey! I got a 5 on my gov test!!! Big props to you man thank you for helping me through this corona test :)))!
Thank you for this, I can’t believe the exam is on Monday. I’m taking 6 exams this year, but I’m confident I’ll pass 3 of them. The others are Government, English and Macroeconomics. But thanks to this I feel more prepared! Thank you! I’m
Charlie Brown OMG me too, 6 exams. And I feel confident for government, micro/macro.
how in the world...i can barely handle two
@@alexaradas4706 I CANT HANDLE ONE 😭
FRQ thesis: Although it is sometimes necessary for the government to heighten their duties during times of duress, the governmental evidence powerfully demonstrates that government surveillance programs such as the one conducted following the 9/11 attacks are a violation of indiviual rights in direct contrast to the 4th amendment and the 14th amendment implied right to privacy.
edit: I just started cramming with only 9 days left to go, so I hope this is a good start!!
Yea I just started cramming with less than 13 hours to go (8 of which I will be sleeping for) but your thesis looks good, only thing is my Gov teacher told me by using two separate amendments, the evidence would both technically count as the constitution and therefore would only be counted as 1 piece of evidence. Not sure how reliable that is but yea!
im here the night before :D we got this lol
well it is 12am the day of the exam... this is going well
i feel the pain
felt
T-minus 4 hours, oh boy
felt that 😭
@@catbuggs T-minus 3 hours, oh no
I can’t believe we’re actually taking the exams at home smh. It all feels so surreal. :(
While surveillance programs may infringe upon people's right to privacy, they ultimately uphold people's natural rights rather than violating them. This is an example of social contract, the idea that the purpose of government is to protect the people at the expense of some of their individual freedom.
This probably works. Given the argument you're making I would simply it and try to avoid admitting that it infringes on people's right to privacy. Try "Surveillance programs uphold people's natural rights rather than violating them and exemplify the social contract, the idea that the purpose of government is to protect the rights of the people."
^^ Try to avoid admitting to flaws. All they want to see is if you can form and present an argument, even if it isn't entirely accurate.
I think this one will work normally, but this year the new rubric takes away the requirements for a concession paragraph. I watched a video in which the CollegeBoard US Gov. chief reader commented on different thesis statements, and when he saw one example that includes a counterargument, he said that it wouldn't earn the point (this year).
@@yuriyu279 Thanks for the info!
Your videos are much better than the overly long AP videos. I'm glad I found you!!
Me too!!
Hi Carey, I just wanted to thank you because of you I passed my AP gov exam!! 👏👑
Hey congrats!!
This is just an argument (I don't necessarily believe this but this was the easiest for me to prove):
Government surveillance programs would not violate individual rights as a result of the "necessary and proper" clause in the Constitution that allows for the federal government to temporarily limit individual freedoms for national security purposes.
Would this work?
Thesis: Government surveillance programs violate individual's rights since they impose on an individual's right to privacy and would be considered "unreasonable search and seizure" under the 4th amendment since the individual would not be aware of the use of their technological information by the government. Is this good or could I improve it in some way?
Also, thank you for your videos! I learned ap govt last semester so it's been stressful relearning all the content for the ap exam but your videos have helped a lot.
is anyone cramming last minute info on the day of the test too lol
yep right here
Paola Vlsqz 😅😔🙏
We do be out here
When there’s a few hours for the test and you decide to review
who’s here getting ready for the makeup 😭😭😭😭
Bro that’s tuff
I am so grateful for your videos! I have learned more in this one playlist than in my entire year of AP Government and Politics class. Thank you so much for taking the time to help us prepare for the exam!!
Thank you so much, I was literally gonna watch all 23 or so videos from AP over the 3 units but these saved me so much time!
My thesis: Government surveillence programs do not violate individual rights because the government does this to fulfill some of its most essential obligations: to protect the peoples' natural right to life, to ensure domestic tranquility, and to provide for the common defense, as these duties are outlined in the Constitution and Declaration of Independence
Very good
Where’s my AP government SQUAD??
literally everyone here
MR LA MANNA, I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT I GOT A 5 ON MY AP GOV EXAM THIS YEAT BECAUSE OF YOUR VIDEOS! I kid you not, I never touched my any of my gov textbooks once, and my teacher mostly gave us a self-study route for that class. While just following your videos throughout the semester, by the time of the AP test I didn’t do any additional studying, but I got that 5!
I made a short, and broad thesis. I am wondering I will get the point for the thesis. Here it is: Government surveillance does not violate individual rights because this program helps protect public interest.
THIS VIDEO HAS HELPED ME DRASTICALLY. You are amazing for creating this because I was so close to taking the L on this one.
its almost 1 am the day of the exam :) love this coronavirus affecting my studies severely :) but on a serious note, thank you so much Carey for these videos. at least they give me hope and actually teach me!
It is a categorical grant because the national government is being very specific in what the states should do with the money.
Yup!
Although increased surveillance may strengthen public safety precautions it expands federal power beyond what is delineated in the constitution and beyond what is granted by the elastic clause by violating the fourth amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure.
How is this? Also thank you, my class is still learning about the bureaucracy and we haven't started reviewing yet so this is so helpful!
Not bad. But make sure to explicitly state that it violates individual rights since that's what the prompt said.
whos here getting ready for the exam on monday 😭
Hi
how was it
me: watching an hour before the exam
What’d you get??😂
Just want to say thank you for all your videos! Would not have gotten a 5 without your help!
Yayyy congrats!!!!!!
Thanks man i got my first exam monday this is saving my grade rn
the answer is c. categorical grant because Congress is giving the states money but only if they comply with the rule of establishing federal education standards
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR MAKING THESE VIDEOS !!!!! IT WAS VERY HELPFUL TO CRAM FOR THE EXAM IN THE LAST MINUTE. I AM HIGHLY SATISFIED WITH MY AP SCORE.
WHAT DID YOU GET?
My AP Government teacher, Ms. Pomerleau, said for every 5 slaves, 3 count, not that slaves are 3/5ths of a person. It is written 3 out of 5, not 3/5ths.
so true!
If you play the audio at 5:55 that's what I say too. Mathematically both statements mean the same thing.
I just came back to this video to say thank you so much for these videos! I got my score today and I got a five! Thanks Mr. LaManna!
the test starts in like 40 mins and i just started studying ☺️
I exclusively watched your videos and just saw that I got a 5 on the test, thank you!
MR LAMANNA YOU SAVED ME THANK YOU SO MUCH
My guy LaManna, I see those Lost DVD sets. Legendary show for sure. Who's your favorite character?
The GOAT show!! That's super tough. Desmond, Locke, and Charlie are all at the top.
Less than 2 hrs will my AP test and here I am..... studying for the first time for this test :D
Procrastination squad! 🤟
Just a quick note for the block grants and categorical grants you forget to add the definition on categorical grants on it, it just stayed as block grants.
Yup, sorry about that :/
Thank you for taking time out of your day to make these videos, it's very much appreciated.
This video helped tremendously, I made a 93 on this test!!
This is my first AP test and I am still getting the hang of writing arguments... Government surveillance programs violate individual rights because according to the 14th amendment every citizen has the right to privacy, and the surveillance programs go against a person having privacy.
You sound like a pro already! Great job. Small thing: no single amendment establishes the right to privacy, so I'd leave the 14th amendment part out, but otherwise it's perfect
Carey LaManna ok thank you!
Thesis: Government surveillance programs violate individual rights because of the violation of privacy rights to individual citizens given by the fourteenth amendment and the violation of the search and arrest procedures under the 4th amendment.
Would that thesis earn a point?
Where my ap gov 2021 folks at
Retake Gang
I'm fairly confident I will do well but watching these a 2 days before an exam will only help me!
If I get a 5 on this thing tomorrow I owe it all to this man.
R3D I’m so scared
10:27 answer is D. The federal government will give money to the states to purchase things for a specific purpose ONLY if .they participate in the program. So I could see C. but I believe D. is the best choice
I believe c because a federal mandate is a law that all states must follow. This law only offers them money if they follow, thus making it a categorical grant as the money goes under education purposes. A federal mandate is a law that no matter what they must follow, funded or not.
DKCrules50 the class room technology could be anything from school laptops to better digital boards. They still have “some freedom” to choose
Atsuki agreed I also think it’s C
ap gov test tomorrow lets hope i do well
You got this!!
thesis : Although there is a need for better security features, without probable clause unreasonable searches are against the 4th amendment of the constitution, in this case government surveillance programs violate individual rights since there is no probable clause behind each individual being recorded with in their rights.
please answer
Very good
Although some may find government surveillance to be necessary, It violates the 4th Amendment’s right of privacy and infringes on individual rights while also strengthening the power of the federal government.
Very good
I think I noticed a mistake in this video, Mr. LaManna. Around 10:13, the definition for a Categorical Grant isn't on screen. It's the same as the Block Grants.
You're absolutely right. Same definition on there twice in a row. At least what I said is right. Sigh. :-/
Anyone else watching an hour before their AP Gov test?
The Bill of Rights, particularly Amendments 1 and 4 of the United States constitution, detail the natural rights of citizens to, respectively, exercise their "freedom of speech" as well as their right to be "secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects." Government surveillance programs, especially ones discreet in nature and in purpose, threaten and potentially violate these notions outlined in the constitution.
Government surveillance programs do violate individual's rights because it would infringe upon the people's right to privacy incorporated by the 14th Amendment.
Would that be alright or is it only correct if I also mention the 4th amendment?
How is this?
Although Surveillance programs are intended to protect against foreign threats and protect citizen life, the 14th amendment guarantees protection against unreasonable search and seizures, and, therefore, such programs are a violation of natural rights.
I'm so grateful for this as this is my first AP. Being an international student, You have made it much easier.
thank you so much man
What’s the answer to that question? I think C
we need more people like you.
Government surveillance programs are meant to protect the people from acts of terror. However, programs involving mass surveillance do infringe on the rights of the people, specifically, their 4th Amendment right to privacy as stated in the Bill of Rights.
Mr. Bello
Thats a thesis statement if ive ever seen one
-T
Mr. Teague
I appreciate your input and criticism. I'm looking forward to reading your thesis statement. Thanks.
-B
I must concur with my colleague, Mr. Teague
Government surveillance programs do not violate individual rights. Rather, they display an increase in federal power which is supported by Federalist 10 and by the founding fathers' initial purpose for federalism.
Good job
Also congress could actually tax, but taxation or anything for that matter couldn’t be enforced. Which is also why no one showed up to the states conventions.
Can you help me with this I don’t know how to write a good thesis : Equality of opportunity is a central value in the American political system. Choose either Congress or the Supreme Court, and present an argument for why your choice is most responsible for advancing the principle of equality of opportunity in the United States.
Hey Colin, so you have to to do two things: make a claim and establish a line of reasoning. So you need to say that either Congress or the Supreme Court is most responsible blah blah and then say BECAUSE and establish a line of reasoning. Your because can be really simple, it's not actually a piece of evidence but you need to give some kind of reason why you selected the one that you did.
Carey LaManna great thanks!
Carey LaManna you dropped this sir 👑
Valentina Liu no no not yet I gotta pass the test first
For your categorical grants slide, you said the right definition but wrote the wrong one in the video.. But thanks for these videos in general, my class has been using them all year!
Awesome, thanks. Glad you noticed I said the right thing at least :)
Although the proclaimed intent of government surveillance programs is to protect citizens from the threat of terrorism, the violation of individual rights and privacy is unconstitutional and goes directly against the fourth and ninth amendment, which are the right against unreasonable searches and the unenumerated rights of the people, respectively. (Megan Audette, period 7)
Very nice
I'M FUCKED
You helped me get a 4! Thank you!
I just started studying now. My test is in two weeks, how hard would you say it was?
for the thesis, I noticed that a lot of people start by saying although surveillance programs are good for protecting ur nation or managing security, they violate individual rights because ... Does our thesis have to be complex or present a counterpoint since they removed the complexity point? can't we just say surveillance programs violate individual rights because ...
You absolutely can. There's no need to acknowledge an alternate perspective or the purpose of those programs. You can get right to the claim: Government surveillance programs violate individual rights because...
could i bring the necessary and proper clause into this thesis? making sure i'm not using it incorrectly.
me: watching this the day before my unit 1 test
Me right now
@@kailaohara8897 me right now
Same is it hard
Governmental surveillance programs do not violate individual rights because the programs don't violate any of the natural rights outlined in the constitution, nor do they violate any of the rights given amendments to the constitution. The programs do not violate the 4th amendment because they have to go through the FISA courts in order to get a search warrant and these courts determine if there is probable cause for a search.
How's this?
(I know im wordy I can't help it)
Government surveillance programs do violate individual rights because of the 4th Amendment’s right to privacy, and the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of due process.
Nice!
Although events such as 9/11 cause proper reasoning for government surveillance programs to be established, such programs would mostly serve to impede individual rights. Established programs such as these would blatantly go against the 4th Amendments right to privacy.
Very good
This isn’t an SAQ pal. This is a TH-cam comment section.
Can you give me some feedback on my thesis? Some Americans think that increasing federal power in order to combat terrorism violates individual rights, however such an increase is a necessary sacrifice to allow the government to protect the citizens from harm.
It's not bad. I'd encourage you to explicitly state that it's NOT a violation of individual rights.I might reword what you wrote to "Increasing federal power in order to combat terrorism does not violate individual rights and is a necessary sacrifice to allow the government to protect the citizens from harm.
@@CareyLaManna Thank you!
Thesis: Government surveillance programs would violate individual rights because it would go against citizen's privacy and rights in order to achieve a form of stability.
How would this be for my thesis?
Government surveillance programs violate individual rights because they violate the 4th amendment which talks about prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures.
I can argue that government surveillance programs do not violate individual right because it is important to make sure that we have a way to defend against terrorism
45 min till exam and im on unit 1 let's go!!!
3 hours left and this is my go-to video
why isn't the multiple choice question D?
Robin Klos because the states don’t have to participate in the program. They aren’t forced to do anything by the federal govt and the government is proving money for a pretty specific purpose ($50 mil for buying new technology) so the best answer would be categorical grant.
Is the answer C because while block grants are a broad area, giving money for technology specifically in the classroom would be categorical grants so C?
Exactly. If the grant was just for "education" it would have been block but being classroom tech is specific so it's categorical.
Is this good? I never learned how to properly write a thesis statement in class.
Government surveillance programs violate individual rights because the 4th amendment states that without a warrant no one is allowed to forcibly enter another persons home. Although keeping the nation safe is everyones top priority we need to take into consideration people's individual rights along with the 4th amendment.
Yes! You would earn the thesis point. You actually had the point after just the first sentence. There's no need to elaborate beyond that. Make a claim and establish a line of reasoning, you did it in the first sentence. Good job
While the debate hangs over the concept of freedom and safety, the government usage of surveillance programs do violate the right to privacy as stated in the 4th Amendment.
The line of reasoning part here is borderline. I think we need a "because"
While some Americans believe that individual rights and privacy are important societal regulations, it would be increasingly beneficial for the government to have the rights of surveillance. It would protect the nation as a whole, combat foreign threats, and strengthen the republic, which weakens factions.
Good. I think you should explicitly state that the surveillance does NOT violate people's rights. It's clearly implied, but my advice is to be as specific to the prompt as possible
Got a 4 this helped so much!
You are a true legend sir. Your to gov what Michel biezen is to physics.
I'll take it
Government surveillance programs do not violate individual rights as information willingly posted on social media platforms has changed the meaning of reasonable expectation of privacy.
Great
last minute cramming gang rise
Daisy Qiu here
Holy crap, my govt teacher HORRIBLE. Thank you sooo much
Queen Pantsu same here
Could you tell me if this thesis is alright? I'm wondering if my line of reasoning is truly a good reasoning:
Government surveillance programs, while an effective method to protect Americans, violate individual rights because they are an invasion of privacy and protections set forth in the Bill of Rights.
Also, for the multiple choice, is the answer D (a federal mandate)? I was debating between C & D because can't grants have mandates attached to them? So isn't it technically both? Categorical grants have a more specific purpose, in this case, new classroom technology. Please explain...
By the way thanks for these videos. The fact that when I watch them, I feel like I understand everything and already knew the information, I feel more relieved. :]
The thesis/line of reasoning is perfect. MC answer is C. It's not a federal mandate because states have the option to say no. They' only have to meet the requirements if they want to get the money, so that's conditions of aid for a categorical grant. Mandates are somethings states MUST do regardless of whether there's money offered or not.
@@CareyLaManna Ohh, alright. That does make sense. And Categorical (project) grants are based on merit, I guess that's the requirement in terms of merit in this case.
Does that mean mandates never come with grants? I know that the No Child Left Behind Act is an example of a mandate.
But also, for example, cross-cutting requirements (I believe that's what it's called), when they had to change the drinking age to get highway funds. What would that be considered? A (categorical) grant with a requirement, or just a mandate?
Thanks for replying, and sorry for the long response I just want to understand everything I'm confused about.