......interesting how not a single major Islamic leadership figure, hasn't stepped up to stand by the almost 100% only white english girls, whom were targeted... .... ....this is an act of war...
@@robertharper6481Correct. The Tories ignoring the issue was utterly despicable, however Labour's seeming stance of "Well they didn't do anything so we don't have to either" makes them just as bad if not worse.
In 2015 Jess Phillips posted on Twitter: “Today I saw George Galloway on the beach I told him he was a rape apologist. Another thing ticked off bucket list” Phillips also back the Labour add : "Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn't" with Rishi's signature on it. Phillips said “I’m fine with the advert. I would have gladly defended it… it’s not hard enough actually” Jess Phillips is a stinking hypocrite. It’s disgraceful she’s making herself out to be a victim, over what she herself has said about someone else, when so many women have been far greater victims.
In 2015 Jess Phillips posted on Twitter: “Today I saw George Galloway on the beach I told him he was a rape apologist. Another thing ticked off bucket list” Phillips also back the Labour add : "Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn't" with Rishi's signature on it. Phillips said “I’m fine with the advert. I would have gladly defended it… it’s not hard enough actually” Jess Phillips is a stinking hypocrite. It’s disgraceful she’s making herself out to be a victim, over what she herself has said about someone else, when so many women have been far greater victims.
I don't even care about the "R" word anymore. I'll tell people that in person. That word is meaningless, it's been stretched too thin, I don't care if you think I'm a "r", you think EVERYTHING ON EARTH is "r".
There was more upset on display when the middle aged, middle class careerist women in the media were subjected to a few double entendres and squalid words from Greg Wallace.
Ummm I doubt that Jess Philips cares AT ALL about these victims, in fact when asked if she had spoken to any of the victims in her constituency she answered a resounding ‘NO’. That tells you all you need to know. She’s an arrogant narcissist who has tried to make herself the victim.
In 2015 Yardley was part of the area that was the No1 spot for child sex abuse in Birmingham (Birminghammail 30/04/2015). In 2015 Jess Phillips was elected MP for Yardley. I don't know how many people have been jailed for abuse in Yardley, but I am not hopeful there have been enough convictions.
It’s emotional and narcissistic abuse, and somehow these people are in government? I feel like I’m in a relationship with my ex being gaslighted all of the time. How have we even got to this point
Labour revealed as morally bankrupt cowards, following Starmers order to throw sexuall abused and brutalised working class vulnerable children under the bus, to ensure the truth of the atrocity remains hidden
We don't really protest in the UK. Probably for the best because the government would either call for an out of proportion police response and speedily throw peaceful protestors in prison, or they would threaten any news organisation that did a report with any hint of neutrality or support.
Good point Britain lectures and has lectured other countries about their treatment of girls and women. If another country did this Britain would consider the country disgusting and barbaric.
The "far-right" accusations are just gaslighting. He and his Labour colleagues all know that they support particular groups who hold actual far-right views.
MSM and the bbc in particular are getting off incredibly lightly in the whole discussion. Elon’s done more reporting and raising awareness about this in the last week than our ‘free media’ have done in 40 years
Agreed. Most charitably, the media has shown a distinct lack of curiosity, mostly reporting incidents before quickly moving on. There's a wilful incuriosity we know would be absolutely reversed if there had been a spate of gangs comprised of indigenous British targeting non-white children, particularly if the government had been covering it up.
It's so rare to see this much good humour in a public affairs discussion. I like it. I also liked the much more serious conversation Fraser had with the Charlie Hebdo editor several days back. Good job all!
Its still going on theres an urgency about this. According to Maggie Oliver. They screamed for inquiry into Cake gate. This is far more serious. We know why protect labour councillors ect and their muslim vote
After the panelist mentioned all the interviews, I googled her name and the top result was a BBC article with the headline: *"Elon Musk's disinformation endangered me, says Jess Phillips."*
In 2015 Jess Phillips posted on Twitter: “Today I saw George Galloway on the beach I told him he was a rape apologist. Another thing ticked off bucket list” Phillips also back the Labour add : "Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn't" with Rishi's signature on it. Phillips said “I’m fine with the advert. I would have gladly defended it… it’s not hard enough actually” Jess Phillips is a stinking hypocrite. It’s disgraceful she’s making herself out to be a victim, over what she herself has said about someone else, when so many women have been far greater victims.
In 2015 Jess Phillips posted on Twitter: “Today I saw George Galloway on the beach I told him he was a rape apologist. Another thing ticked off bucket list” Phillips also back the Labour add : "Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn't" with Rishi's signature on it. Phillips said “I’m fine with the advert. I would have gladly defended it… it’s not hard enough actually” Jess Phillips is a stinking hypocrite. It’s disgraceful she’s making herself out to be a victim, over what she herself has said about someone else, when so many women have been far greater victims.
I would say Sir Kier believes he is more important than he actually is, yes. All he is is a Prime Minister, powerful yes, but that passes and the next Prime Minister comes along... what happens to Sir Kier then? As the world moves past him he is left alone and has all these enemies he created - Trump, Musk etc - and these will still be hugely powerful and influential people in five, ten, 20 years time. Sir Kier? Without the Prime Minister mantle, he is a nobody compared to those men. And what goes around comes around...
Very good discussion, incisive analysis and a really important overview of the whole grooming gangs scandal. Tom Slater nails the elite liberal establishment worldview and how that has driven their response to this horrific story.
Zuck has been doing Brazilian Jiu Jitsu. He's put on a fair amount of muscle, started wearing stylish clothes, and is growing his hair out. I genuinely believe everyone bullying his congressional testimony photos, saying he looks like an android, made him realize he could be a way cooler billionaire if he set his mind to it.
The way he trots this out reminds me of Rowling's Minister for Magic blaming everything on "mass murderer Sirius Black". His weak brain can't face the truth so hides desperately in the delusion that everything can be blamed on a fictitious bogeyman.
I feel you're being a bit generous with Starmer and Phillips - it's definitely too risky to uncover all the labour councils failure and complicity in these horrific crimes at this scale.... they would be ushering the end of the Labour party
8:06 "I just thought, all the broadcasters who are sympathetic to Jess Phillips are going to come in and make her the victim in this." When she said that I went and googled "Jess Phillips" and the recommended result was a BBC article with the headline: *"Elon Musk's disinformation endangered me, says Jess Phillips."*
In 2015 Jess Phillips posted on Twitter: “Today I saw George Galloway on the beach I told him he was a rape apologist. Another thing ticked off bucket list” Phillips also back the Labour add : "Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn't" with Rishi's signature on it. Phillips said “I’m fine with the advert. I would have gladly defended it… it’s not hard enough actually” Jess Phillips is a stinking hypocrite. It’s disgraceful she’s making herself out to be a victim, over what she herself has said about someone else, when so many women have been far greater victims.
In 2015 Jess Phillips posted on Twitter: “Today I saw George Galloway on the beach I told him he was a rape apologist. Another thing ticked off bucket list” Phillips also back the Labour add : "Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn't" with Rishi's signature on it. Phillips said “I’m fine with the advert. I would have gladly defended it… it’s not hard enough actually” Jess Phillips is a stinking hypocrite. It’s disgraceful she’s making herself out to be a victim, over what she herself has said about someone else, when so many women have been far greater victims.
Love how eloquently and humoursly Spiked deal with very macabre current issues, made all the more palatable by: Tom's perennial rosy cheeks, Emily's exquisite hair and Fraser's perfectly pressed shirts.
Missing in the analysis of Musk's war of tweets on UK govt is that, when during the Aug riots the Met police commissioner - who was closely liaising with govt and Starmer - was asked direcly about arresting ppl not in the UK for social media posts, he did not rule out applying UK rule of law on US citizens posting on social media incl Musk. This was a foremost agent of the UK state threatening US citizens which arguably could be interpreted as harassment and threatening an act of war. Obviously ridiculous and hugely hubristic, but nonetheless accounts for Musk's activity. FAFO as he might post on Xitter. Also I have little doubt he is acting as Trump's wing-man in this regard.
@@Songbirdstress I don't know, although Met Commissioner comments were made in Aug under Biden admin while an upcoming Harris admin was a possibility. Labour govt were ideologically in line with them and there's no doubt in my mind that the Dems saw Musk as an opponent, an active obstacle to their agenda and likely a threat to keeping to themselves whatever they don't want people to know about, so one can only speculate what could have ensued in terms of their relationship with UK govt. Even as it is, can Musk be certain he can enter the UK for business or pleasure without being arrested for something he posted? Or, for that matter, any US citizen that has posted a strongly worded opinion on social media?
@@Songbirdstress I don't know, although Met Commissioner comments were made in Aug under Biden admin while an upcoming Harris admin was a possibility. Labour govt were ideologically in line with them and there's no doubt in my mind that the Dems saw Musk as an opponent, an active obstacle to their agenda and likely a threat to keeping to themselves whatever they don't want people to know about, so one can only speculate what could have ensued in terms of their relationship with UK govt. Even as it is, can Musk be certain he can enter the UK for business or pleasure without being arrested for something he posted? Or, for that matter, any US citizen that has posted a strongly worded opinion on social media?
Musk is a bit if twat, imo, but he has a genius for pricking the pricks and for that we should be grateful. Also, unlike UK citizens, he has the protection of the US constitution and will never face extradition for his freedom of speech.
@@Songbirdstress 3rd time making this reply and strangely every time it doesn't appear except in my comments History. If it doesn't appear this time I'm giving up. Anyway: I don't know, although Met Commissioner comments were made in Aug under Biden admin while an upcoming Harris admin was a possibility. Labour govt were ideologically in line with them and there's no doubt in my mind that the Dems saw Musk as an opponent, an active obstacle to their agenda and likely a thr3at to keeping to themselves whatever they don't want people to know about, so one can only speculate what could have ensued in terms of their relationship with UK govt. Even as it is, can Musk be certain he can enter the UK for business or pleasure without being arrested for something he posted? Or, for that matter, any US citizen that has posted a strongly worded opinion on social media?
Maybe this is dumb question but wouldn't an inquiry just give the power to the state to quell the story for as long as they want before publishing the report?
Yes. If they take 7 years to do it, they'll be long gone when it's done. And when it is done, the outcome will be just be: it was unfortunate, things could have been done better, but nobody is to blame.
He reminds me of the odd robot in 'Lost In Space', "Danger danger, Tommy Robinson, danger danger. "Farrrr Riiiight", Empathy does not compute. Release the sausagesssss"...
Emily, you say Starmer took the knee without really committing to it (not your words, mine), but he did it. I know he is greedy, though-like everyone in politics-and his greediness is taking the limelight. He'll do anything to just be in front, which we have all said time and time again about him. He is an ineffectual slinky.
As someone on the far right myself I would actually say Starmer has a point. If the true depth of the scandal were to emerge it would “red pill” a lot of people into the idea that liberal democracy and the rule of law essentially impossible with large numbers of foreigners (particularly Muslims) settler in your lands
I have no idea what you mean when you say you are on the far right. Are you an ex-member of the BNP? Or someone like myself who used to be on the left but over the last 20 years got sick of IdPol and wokism and mass and illegal immigration?
@ I would describe myself as a National Socialist. I think the state should represent the ethnic interests of the founding group. And I think the races should be preserved in their difference in different parts of the world.
For an American, right = small government and left = big government. National Socialism is left, libertarians are right. Europe seems to consider left and right alternate flavors of statism: communist vs royalist. We should bear that in mind, despite propagandists doing their best to warp all language.
@@sanniepstein4835 I’m not sure how useful right and left is to describe specific policy positions. Right and left are somewhat philosophical tendencies in that those on the right view inequality as natural and tradition as respectable. Leftists are suspicious of inequality and view traditions as inherently restrictive.
Simply put, racism is when someone acts differently because of the ethnicity of individual(s). “Political correctness” is a term used for when authorities cover-up or are unduly lenient because of the ethnicity of the perpetrators. It is a reference to a doctrine, a doctrine that is demonstrably racist.
There were also a case with a labor major in Norway who had with him a 14 year old girl at their national convention and no one reacted! Later it became clear he was sleeping with the teenager. It wasn’t really a big case in media. But when another labor parlament member who fell out of favor from the top ranks they accused him of sexual misconduct, even when the «victims» said they flirted with him and it was voluntary and they liked him. But the candidate who wanted his place was a Muslim woman who’s husband was a journalist in the country’s largest newspaper so they ran weeks with that story. Then another «wistle blower» came out. She was high up in the party and told he touched her back when she down on his lap at a party. It’s so horrible, it’s ok to rape teenage girls, but not ok to touch a grown woman in her fourties on the back when she sits down on your lap. Labor politicians have no moral, it’s only what benefits them. Time to rise up against the evil.
00:04 - Debate on grooming gangs highlights failures in addressing serious issues. 02:07 - Government response to child exploitation remains evasive and lacks specificity. 05:57 - Discussion on establishment's avoidance of grooming gang issues. 07:43 - Media's uncritical support for Jess Phillips raises accountability questions. 11:30 - Criticism of labeling national inquiry claims as far-right propaganda. 14:01 - The fight against misinformation often enforces political conformity. 17:30 - Zuckerberg's shifting stance on free speech amidst political pressure. 19:03 - Censorship dynamics shift with user demand and ownership changes. 22:22 - Changes in free speech attitudes ten years after the Charlie Hebdo attack are concerning. 24:17 - Debate over free speech and racism surrounding Charlie Hebdo's cartoons intensified after the attack. 27:49 - Concerns about free speech and protection of critical voices within the Muslim community. 29:38 - Islamism primarily targets Muslims, risking free speech for marginalized voices. 33:08 - Discussion on Canada's authoritarianism under Trudeau amid woke culture. 35:00 - Canada's extreme progressive policies serve as a warning for others.
Charlie Peters investigating the issue is great but his investigations mostly cover things that thousands of us have known about and been protesting about for years and years. there are multiple books as well as inquiries that cover virtually all of Peters' 'discoveries'
You guys could have talked about these r*pe gangs anytime you wanted. Same with all the other journalists. But you're only doing it now. This problem has been going on for decades. Is this just a trend for you? Or are you going to discuss ways to actually stop the gangs?
Hold on a second, are we not also a little concerned about some of the language Elon is using. "rape genocide apologist" and asking King Charles to dissolve Parliament. This is really dangerous stuff. He could have highlighted this massive, monumental failing more nuancedly. He does have the biggest voice on the planet after all. FYI - I am not saying that Labour and the media haven't completely screwed up on this either.
Without fact checkers, how would we know what to think? You would never have seen the kind of indulging in hate facts on X about "grooming gangs" (youtube compels me to use the euphemism) when we had the fact checkers for example. And to those who argue that its a good thing that there is the (remote) possibility of something now being done about "grooming gangs", please consider if the reputational damage to "groomers" is really a price worth paying?
It's staggering how "upsetting Muslims" is regarded as vastly worse than hundreds of thousands of our children being horrifically abused.
......interesting how not a single major Islamic leadership figure, hasn't stepped up to stand by the almost 100% only white english girls, whom were targeted... ....
....this is an act of war...
👍👍👍 absolutely it’s shameful 👿😡
You only think that because you arnt desperate for there vote....
Starmer’s response is sickening!
Agreed. Tone-deaf.
Starmers response was predictable.
Even worse than the Tories silence...
@@robertharper6481Correct. The Tories ignoring the issue was utterly despicable, however Labour's seeming stance of "Well they didn't do anything so we don't have to either" makes them just as bad if not worse.
Jes Phillips is sooooo concerned that she never spoke with her constituents who have been victims of this.
In 2015 Jess Phillips posted on Twitter:
“Today I saw George Galloway on the beach I told him he was a rape apologist. Another thing ticked off bucket list”
Phillips also back the Labour add : "Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn't" with Rishi's signature on it.
Phillips said “I’m fine with the advert. I would have gladly defended it… it’s not hard enough actually”
Jess Phillips is a stinking hypocrite. It’s disgraceful she’s making herself out to be a victim, over what she herself has said about someone else, when so many women have been far greater victims.
In 2015 Jess Phillips posted on Twitter:
“Today I saw George Galloway on the beach I told him he was a rape apologist. Another thing ticked off bucket list”
Phillips also back the Labour add : "Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn't" with Rishi's signature on it.
Phillips said “I’m fine with the advert. I would have gladly defended it… it’s not hard enough actually”
Jess Phillips is a stinking hypocrite. It’s disgraceful she’s making herself out to be a victim, over what she herself has said about someone else, when so many women have been far greater victims.
According to Jes Philips she is a victim
As soon as he says " far right" he's lost the argument
Those slurs don’t work anymore
I don't even care about the "R" word anymore. I'll tell people that in person. That word is meaningless, it's been stretched too thin, I don't care if you think I'm a "r", you think EVERYTHING ON EARTH is "r".
I wish that was true..but the narrative of name calling and P.C culture still remains all powering im afraid
@@johnatkinson7479 Remember the ending of Finding Nemo? SWIM DOWN, SWIM DOWN! EVERYONE SWIM DOWN!
@@johnatkinson7479True, but if no one cares anymore it's over.
Thing is, according to the law and the police it still matters, more than anything else.
He is treating us, all of us, with utter contempt
What is Starmerism ==It is when you deny a truth and blame an imaginary political movement
There was more upset on display when the middle aged, middle class careerist women in the media were subjected to a few double entendres and squalid words from Greg Wallace.
Yes because it shows how great the disregard for the white working class by the liberal lefty establishment.
Ummm I doubt that Jess Philips cares AT ALL about these victims, in fact when asked if she had spoken to any of the victims in her constituency she answered a resounding ‘NO’. That tells you all you need to know. She’s an arrogant narcissist who has tried to make herself the victim.
I loathed her before but now I cannot even stand to see her. She is utterly despicable as are the rest of her useless party!
Her comments on the rapes in Cologne should have cancelled her long ago
In 2015 Yardley was part of the area that was the No1 spot for child sex abuse in Birmingham (Birminghammail 30/04/2015). In 2015 Jess Phillips was elected MP for Yardley. I don't know how many people have been jailed for abuse in Yardley, but I am not hopeful there have been enough convictions.
Because they were 'the wrong kind of victim'.
She had a good laugh about male suicide in a commons committee...
“Justice is racism”
~1984 part 2
Big Brother decided that the people of 'Runway One' were the real evil especially the children. 1984 Pt2
It’s emotional and narcissistic abuse, and somehow these people are in government? I feel like I’m in a relationship with my ex being gaslighted all of the time. How have we even got to this point
The "Far Right" meme is wearing thin to the point of preposterousness....No Keir...it won't wash any more...
When you're as far left as he is, all sane opinion probably does look far off to the right.
Well according to Starmer I am a far right Racist
The moment there is push back, we get the Helen Lovejoy: "Won't somebody please think of the children?"
But they didn't.
10 years on it’s got worse.
Labour revealed as morally bankrupt cowards, following Starmers order to throw sexuall abused and brutalised working class vulnerable children under the bus, to ensure the truth of the atrocity remains hidden
There's a far left bandwagon leaving Ottawa soon. Room for macron and starmer as well.
Love it.
😂😂😂
😂
I don't know how you can stand Starmer. There should be more protests until he resigns.
We don't really protest in the UK.
Probably for the best because the government would either call for an out of proportion police response and speedily throw peaceful protestors in prison, or they would threaten any news organisation that did a report with any hint of neutrality or support.
Can you imagine this happening in a country that lectures the African, Asian, South American countries on human rights?
Good point Britain lectures and has lectured other countries about their treatment of girls and women. If another country did this Britain would consider the country disgusting and barbaric.
The "far-right" accusations are just gaslighting. He and his Labour colleagues all know that they support particular groups who hold actual far-right views.
Because they vote for him Starmer is scum
Indigenous ENGLISH 🏴 and proud to be labelled ⏩️ !
Vote 🗳 REFORM UK 🇬🇧
Tom is an eloquent, articulate lad
He is outstanding. Steven Edginton another talent.
Indeed he is.
MSM and the bbc in particular are getting off incredibly lightly in the whole discussion.
Elon’s done more reporting and raising awareness about this in the last week than our ‘free media’ have done in 40 years
Agreed. Most charitably, the media has shown a distinct lack of curiosity, mostly reporting incidents before quickly moving on. There's a wilful incuriosity we know would be absolutely reversed if there had been a spate of gangs comprised of indigenous British targeting non-white children, particularly if the government had been covering it up.
They are typical lawyers....blah blah blah....and NO action
Far right isn't a slur...it means look after your own.
It's so rare to see this much good humour in a public affairs discussion. I like it. I also liked the much more serious conversation Fraser had with the Charlie Hebdo editor several days back. Good job all!
Nobody ever marches through the street proclaiming "Je suis Battley".
Its still going on theres an urgency about this. According to Maggie Oliver. They screamed for inquiry into Cake gate. This is far more serious. We know why protect labour councillors ect and their muslim vote
Labour have prooved that their priorities are not the british public. We need them out
Permanently. Labour only care about protecting mosques and their Islamic vote.
Well done team, keep chipping away at the blob
Even if the issue was strumentalized to serve a racist agenda, I'll take that if it means stopping those monsters
Yesterday, Ivor Caplin, former Labour MP (Hove) and minister (Defence) was arrested for allegedly grooming and arranging to meet a child
Jess Phillips tries to make it all about her well cry me a river I don’t care about her
After the panelist mentioned all the interviews, I googled her name and the top result was a BBC article with the headline: *"Elon Musk's disinformation endangered me, says Jess Phillips."*
@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoatDEAR GOD THIS BLOODY WOMAN! 🙈What a narcissist.
In 2015 Jess Phillips posted on Twitter:
“Today I saw George Galloway on the beach I told him he was a rape apologist. Another thing ticked off bucket list”
Phillips also back the Labour add : "Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn't" with Rishi's signature on it.
Phillips said “I’m fine with the advert. I would have gladly defended it… it’s not hard enough actually”
Jess Phillips is a stinking hypocrite. It’s disgraceful she’s making herself out to be a victim, over what she herself has said about someone else, when so many women have been far greater victims.
In 2015 Jess Phillips posted on Twitter:
“Today I saw George Galloway on the beach I told him he was a rape apologist. Another thing ticked off bucket list”
Phillips also back the Labour add : "Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn't" with Rishi's signature on it.
Phillips said “I’m fine with the advert. I would have gladly defended it… it’s not hard enough actually”
Jess Phillips is a stinking hypocrite. It’s disgraceful she’s making herself out to be a victim, over what she herself has said about someone else, when so many women have been far greater victims.
Hundreds of thousands of girls systematically abused; Jess Phillips most affected.
We're all far right now. We know that far right is newspeak for native British.
Far right of Starmer, means being right and doing the right thing.
He never had the narrative. He's too arrogant and ideologically compromised.
I would say Sir Kier believes he is more important than he actually is, yes. All he is is a Prime Minister, powerful yes, but that passes and the next Prime Minister comes along... what happens to Sir Kier then? As the world moves past him he is left alone and has all these enemies he created - Trump, Musk etc - and these will still be hugely powerful and influential people in five, ten, 20 years time.
Sir Kier? Without the Prime Minister mantle, he is a nobody compared to those men. And what goes around comes around...
Starmer never even spoke to Rosie Duffield when she was being threatened and abused on social media relentlessly let alone supported her
STARMER WANTS TO SHUT THIS DOWN ‼️ THAT'S WHY HE CALLS DECENT PEOPLE FAR RIGHT‼️ PANDORAS BOX IS OPEN NOW‼️
If you haven't been called FAR RIGHT then you have no independant opinions nor ask any questions, just nod.
According to latest polls 75% of the British public are far right.
3 line whip for the vote, and while all the backbench peasants get in line, while the party elites all abstains.
Not one Labour stood up to be counted. Not one Labour MP prepared to say my Job is not worth this cover up.
That way they can say they never voted to cover up anything they were involved in. Which might be an agrivating factor in any sentencing.
Very good discussion, incisive analysis and a really important overview of the whole grooming gangs scandal. Tom Slater nails the elite liberal establishment worldview and how that has driven their response to this horrific story.
Zuck got jealous of Musk's position.
He's covering his own ass so he can continue being rich, powerful and corrupt.
Exactly
Oligarchs bowing to the new "King "
Zuck has been doing Brazilian Jiu Jitsu. He's put on a fair amount of muscle, started wearing stylish clothes, and is growing his hair out.
I genuinely believe everyone bullying his congressional testimony photos, saying he looks like an android, made him realize he could be a way cooler billionaire if he set his mind to it.
IMO it's because he knows that Trump is very likely to take action to deal with social media companies who censor legal content.
Excellent discussion.
The way he trots this out reminds me of Rowling's Minister for Magic blaming everything on "mass murderer Sirius Black". His weak brain can't face the truth so hides desperately in the delusion that everything can be blamed on a fictitious bogeyman.
Real people do not exist for Starmer. I loath his legalistic synthetic thinking.
Starmer needs to be in jail
I feel you're being a bit generous with Starmer and Phillips - it's definitely too risky to uncover all the labour councils failure and complicity in these horrific crimes at this scale.... they would be ushering the end of the Labour party
Wouldn't fancy being a labour canvasser if the local elections ever happen.
the labour government doesn't want an inquiry into mainly labour councils shock
NEVER forget the (Sir) Cyril Smith cover up. Labour PDFile.
@@Ariadne_Oliver Cyril Smith was a Liberal
Really good conversation, thank you.
First time I have watched. Good content, keep it up.
Public servants totally lacking in culpability and ‘slagging’ off survivors….we need to get a grip
8:06 "I just thought, all the broadcasters who are sympathetic to Jess Phillips are going to come in and make her the victim in this."
When she said that I went and googled "Jess Phillips" and the recommended result was a BBC article with the headline: *"Elon Musk's disinformation endangered me, says Jess Phillips."*
In 2015 Jess Phillips posted on Twitter:
“Today I saw George Galloway on the beach I told him he was a rape apologist. Another thing ticked off bucket list”
Phillips also back the Labour add : "Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn't" with Rishi's signature on it.
Phillips said “I’m fine with the advert. I would have gladly defended it… it’s not hard enough actually”
Jess Phillips is a stinking hypocrite. It’s disgraceful she’s making herself out to be a victim, over what she herself has said about someone else, when so many women have been far greater victims.
In 2015 Jess Phillips posted on Twitter:
“Today I saw George Galloway on the beach I told him he was a rape apologist. Another thing ticked off bucket list”
Phillips also back the Labour add : "Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn't" with Rishi's signature on it.
Phillips said “I’m fine with the advert. I would have gladly defended it… it’s not hard enough actually”
Jess Phillips is a stinking hypocrite. It’s disgraceful she’s making herself out to be a victim, over what she herself has said about someone else, when so many women have been far greater victims.
Far Whyte slur is what he means!
Love how eloquently and humoursly Spiked deal with very macabre current issues, made all the more palatable by: Tom's perennial rosy cheeks, Emily's exquisite hair and Fraser's perfectly pressed shirts.
Missing in the analysis of Musk's war of tweets on UK govt is that, when during the Aug riots the Met police commissioner - who was closely liaising with govt and Starmer - was asked direcly about arresting ppl not in the UK for social media posts, he did not rule out applying UK rule of law on US citizens posting on social media incl Musk. This was a foremost agent of the UK state threatening US citizens which arguably could be interpreted as harassment and threatening an act of war. Obviously ridiculous and hugely hubristic, but nonetheless accounts for Musk's activity. FAFO as he might post on Xitter. Also I have little doubt he is acting as Trump's wing-man in this regard.
How would extradition work? Because I am sure that the the American courts would never allow extradition.
@@Songbirdstress I don't know, although Met Commissioner comments were made in Aug under Biden admin while an upcoming Harris admin was a possibility. Labour govt were ideologically in line with them and there's no doubt in my mind that the Dems saw Musk as an opponent, an active obstacle to their agenda and likely a threat to keeping to themselves whatever they don't want people to know about, so one can only speculate what could have ensued in terms of their relationship with UK govt. Even as it is, can Musk be certain he can enter the UK for business or pleasure without being arrested for something he posted? Or, for that matter, any US citizen that has posted a strongly worded opinion on social media?
@@Songbirdstress I don't know, although Met Commissioner comments were made in Aug under Biden admin while an upcoming Harris admin was a possibility. Labour govt were ideologically in line with them and there's no doubt in my mind that the Dems saw Musk as an opponent, an active obstacle to their agenda and likely a threat to keeping to themselves whatever they don't want people to know about, so one can only speculate what could have ensued in terms of their relationship with UK govt. Even as it is, can Musk be certain he can enter the UK for business or pleasure without being arrested for something he posted? Or, for that matter, any US citizen that has posted a strongly worded opinion on social media?
Musk is a bit if twat, imo, but he has a genius for pricking the pricks and for that we should be grateful. Also, unlike UK citizens, he has the protection of the US constitution and will never face extradition for his freedom of speech.
@@Songbirdstress 3rd time making this reply and strangely every time it doesn't appear except in my comments History. If it doesn't appear this time I'm giving up. Anyway:
I don't know, although Met Commissioner comments were made in Aug under Biden admin while an upcoming Harris admin was a possibility. Labour govt were ideologically in line with them and there's no doubt in my mind that the Dems saw Musk as an opponent, an active obstacle to their agenda and likely a thr3at to keeping to themselves whatever they don't want people to know about, so one can only speculate what could have ensued in terms of their relationship with UK govt. Even as it is, can Musk be certain he can enter the UK for business or pleasure without being arrested for something he posted? Or, for that matter, any US citizen that has posted a strongly worded opinion on social media?
"Victim Blaming" is the politically rebranded term.
3 out of 4 of your stories this week demonstrate the fearsome power of the word "Racism"
Meaningless words when repeated enough
Maybe this is dumb question but wouldn't an inquiry just give the power to the state to quell the story for as long as they want before publishing the report?
Yes. If they take 7 years to do it, they'll be long gone when it's done. And when it is done, the outcome will be just be: it was unfortunate, things could have been done better, but nobody is to blame.
Interesting 😊😊😊😊
I would happily leave a Super Thanks if it was an option 👍
Im sick of far rightphobia 😂
Starmer isn't a woke progressive? You're having a laugh. He's like the C-3PO origin version of woke.
He reminds me of the odd robot in 'Lost In Space', "Danger danger, Tommy Robinson, danger danger. "Farrrr Riiiight", Empathy does not compute. Release the sausagesssss"...
""Phobic", "phobia",snd "phobe", are bully suffixes. Their purpose is to suppress reasoned and evidenced discussion of faith based views.
''the far right bandwagon'' yeah, because the plan is, we all are supposed to light a candle and take it silently.
Be like me, dismiss anything starmer says because he’s an institutional liar & barrister
\so nice to hear Emily's real voice instead of her shouty tv screech!
I am far-right spartacus.
Kier Slurmer
Wow can’t believe you got Elon Musk on the show 😂
Finally, a British/American journalist who pronounces Charlie Hebdo correctly! I mean, it's not exactly rocket science, is it?
Emily, you say Starmer took the knee without really committing to it (not your words, mine), but he did it. I know he is greedy, though-like everyone in politics-and his greediness is taking the limelight. He'll do anything to just be in front, which we have all said time and time again about him. He is an ineffectual slinky.
As someone on the far right myself I would actually say Starmer has a point. If the true depth of the scandal were to emerge it would “red pill” a lot of people into the idea that liberal democracy and the rule of law essentially impossible with large numbers of foreigners (particularly Muslims) settler in your lands
I have no idea what you mean when you say you are on the far right. Are you an ex-member of the BNP? Or someone like myself who used to be on the left but over the last 20 years got sick of IdPol and wokism and mass and illegal immigration?
@ I would describe myself as a National Socialist. I think the state should represent the ethnic interests of the founding group. And I think the races should be preserved in their difference in different parts of the world.
For an American, right = small government and left = big government. National Socialism is left, libertarians are right.
Europe seems to consider left and right alternate flavors of statism: communist vs royalist.
We should bear that in mind, despite propagandists doing their best to warp all language.
@@sanniepstein4835 I’m not sure how useful right and left is to describe specific policy positions. Right and left are somewhat philosophical tendencies in that those on the right view inequality as natural and tradition as respectable. Leftists are suspicious of inequality and view traditions as inherently restrictive.
Simply put, racism is when someone acts differently because of the ethnicity of individual(s). “Political correctness” is a term used for when authorities cover-up or are unduly lenient because of the ethnicity of the perpetrators. It is a reference to a doctrine, a doctrine that is demonstrably racist.
even Spiked. : avoided it
Fear
Time to call it what it is, stop using “grooming” and use the correct word
Someone forgot to add in the Shopify sound affect.
A socialist does not have to be forcingly a nazi - but every nazi without exception is also a socialist.
'Canada's first black prime minister' lol
I think you're wrong about tone policing I don't think there's any kind of tone that they would accept the discussion.
There were also a case with a labor major in Norway who had with him a 14 year old girl at their national convention and no one reacted! Later it became clear he was sleeping with the teenager. It wasn’t really a big case in media. But when another labor parlament member who fell out of favor from the top ranks they accused him of sexual misconduct, even when the «victims» said they flirted with him and it was voluntary and they liked him. But the candidate who wanted his place was a Muslim woman who’s husband was a journalist in the country’s largest newspaper so they ran weeks with that story. Then another «wistle blower» came out. She was high up in the party and told he touched her back when she down on his lap at a party. It’s so horrible, it’s ok to rape teenage girls, but not ok to touch a grown woman in her fourties on the back when she sits down on your lap. Labor politicians have no moral, it’s only what benefits them. Time to rise up against the evil.
00:04 - Debate on grooming gangs highlights failures in addressing serious issues.
02:07 - Government response to child exploitation remains evasive and lacks specificity.
05:57 - Discussion on establishment's avoidance of grooming gang issues.
07:43 - Media's uncritical support for Jess Phillips raises accountability questions.
11:30 - Criticism of labeling national inquiry claims as far-right propaganda.
14:01 - The fight against misinformation often enforces political conformity.
17:30 - Zuckerberg's shifting stance on free speech amidst political pressure.
19:03 - Censorship dynamics shift with user demand and ownership changes.
22:22 - Changes in free speech attitudes ten years after the Charlie Hebdo attack are concerning.
24:17 - Debate over free speech and racism surrounding Charlie Hebdo's cartoons intensified after the attack.
27:49 - Concerns about free speech and protection of critical voices within the Muslim community.
29:38 - Islamism primarily targets Muslims, risking free speech for marginalized voices.
33:08 - Discussion on Canada's authoritarianism under Trudeau amid woke culture.
35:00 - Canada's extreme progressive policies serve as a warning for others.
Please get informed, have Raja Miah on and you will get educated of Burnham and Mahmood.
Starmer’s “far right” BS no longer works.
Last time the ‘Bandwagon’ was referred to was in the Post Office scandal inquiry. Coincidence …. Maybe not!
aldi 5 blade shaver refills £3.99
That explains the redness.
And if so , whars wrong with being far right..free choice
It's not a slur when it's right.
Is this a play on words?
Please see Raja Miah
Charlie Peters investigating the issue is great but his investigations mostly cover things that thousands of us have known about and been protesting about for years and years. there are multiple books as well as inquiries that cover virtually all of Peters' 'discoveries'
It is alarming and horrendous of tthe girls.
What is it with Spiked and redheads? Tom?
Lidl parkside baseball caps £3.49
You guys could have talked about these r*pe gangs anytime you wanted. Same with all the other journalists. But you're only doing it now. This problem has been going on for decades. Is this just a trend for you? Or are you going to discuss ways to actually stop the gangs?
Adolph kept on with more of the same until, well, we know how that story ended.
Hold on a second, are we not also a little concerned about some of the language Elon is using. "rape genocide apologist" and asking King Charles to dissolve Parliament. This is really dangerous stuff. He could have highlighted this massive, monumental failing more nuancedly. He does have the biggest voice on the planet after all.
FYI - I am not saying that Labour and the media haven't completely screwed up on this either.
Without fact checkers, how would we know what to think?
You would never have seen the kind of indulging in hate facts on X about "grooming gangs" (youtube compels me to use the euphemism) when we had the fact checkers for example.
And to those who argue that its a good thing that there is the (remote) possibility of something now being done about "grooming gangs", please consider if the reputational damage to "groomers" is really a price worth paying?
Why be so squeamish about what really happened? Surely that is part of the problem.
Justin TruDOH!
Does Charlie Hebdo mock all religions including Judaism?
Yes
Why don't you do your research and find out for yourself!
Yes.
Also Christianity, but I don't take offense.
Really don't like insinuating comments.
@PanicBeach. Yes, of course they do.
I hate that man he is such a coward
Don't hate god loves you and him he died for you both
That’s what he does labelling people as FAR RIGHT RACISTS its damn ridiculous two tier KEIR is weird
I think keeping it hush for the sake of diversity is a complete red herring. I think there is a much darker reason why this was done.
NEVER forget the (Sir) Cyril Smith cover up. Labour PDFile.
Actually, he was a Liberal MP.