ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Ahead (ABM) Programmable Fuze System (Rheinmetall)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 มี.ค. 2023
- Rheinmetall’s 35mm x 228 Oerlikon Ahead airburst ammunition inside. How it works. Russian shock in a battlefield.
My next video will be about VMG fuze for grenades.
I am currently raising funds for a 3D printer "Flashforge creator 4" to make mock-ups of parts and I will be glad for your help:
- PayPal: andim461@gmail.com
- USDT (ERC20): 0xadfEB3CC93bc95e17B05Fe39CE10232EB4153545
- ETH: 0xadfEB3CC93bc95e17B05Fe39CE10232EB4153545
#fuze, #projectile, #Fuze, #fuse, #rheinmetall, #ahead, #Ahead, #airburst, #ammunition, #weapons, #antidrone, #airdefense.
![น้าครับ..ผมรักน้า EP.04 - ปีกแดงเดอะซีรีส์2024[ฟินมาก] บทซีรีส์สร้างขึ้นเพื่อความบันเทิงเท่านั้น](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/m9Q6MwoWgaQ/mqdefault.jpg)
You can support us:
USDT (ERC20): 0xadfEB3CC93bc95e17B05Fe39CE10232EB4153545
ETH: 0xadfEB3CC93bc95e17B05Fe39CE10232EB4153545
Paypal: paypal.me/andim461
Do you sell this concept?
I will think about putting this 3D model on Patreon
It was interesting how it works. Never thought that this thing is so complicated.
and I'll dream again about how expensive it is
didn't know a bullet can get this SMART
Approximately the same projectiles are made in the USA, Norway, Singapore, China and even North Korea.
Next gen flak from Rheinmetall for the Luftwaffe
Imagine Rheinmetall made an 88mm flak cannon with AHEAD technology, with modern computers and radar, lets see a TU160 Blackjack get past that at medium altitude
This would be an interesting solution.
Imagine biological payload ICBM obliterate every single wheat field in europe.
his idea is better@@vladcrow4225
Oto Melara have similar tech for 76 and 127mm gun IIRC
In fact most naval cannon these days have programmable ammo, because anything is cheaper than sunken ships
Ничего эффективней ракет пока не изобрели th-cam.com/video/SMgquNzmoz8/w-d-xo.html
Amazing how 80 years ago this was done with an optical rangefinder, a spanner and a four-man crew.
But with precision that not even close to this tech.
Just Insane how Hi Tech weapons are becoming !
Why use programmable time-fused ammunition when proximity-fused ammunition can be used with simpler system?
Because they have different fragmentation field, and proximity-fused ammunition cannot always detect the target. They are designed for different tasks
@@specialengineer2718 if the target isn't detected by radio-proximity fuse a few meters away, it likely won't be detected by radar 10 kilometers away either.
Yes, I agree with you. As I said above:
basically, one has an axial fragmentation field, the other is radial. This will affect the effectiveness of the application. One day I will create video about this
How about cost?
It's MUCH cheaper and simpler just to have an accurate programmable electronic clock and transceiver on board the shell rather than a complete active radar set.
Not to mention the increased power requirements of a radar set.
Not to mention that it has to be mounted at the bow of the shell and takes up more space.
ABM has room for all the bursting charge and sub fragments right at the bow of the shell with the fuze sitting astern.
@@MostlyPennyCat The cost of the projectile is from $300 to 1000. So this projectile does not have a radar. It is programmed at the exit from the barrel and detonated in the right place. There are projectiles with radar that themselves control their detonation point. If I understand you correctly
Extremely effective.. and expensive.
I wonder how much it cost. More than 1000$?
@@specialengineer2718 Not sure. Can try and ask some I know, that are in the Navy. They use them in their Millennium Guns(CIWS), that are mounted on some of their frigates. I'll return..
@@specialengineer2718 I know the price for the 30 mm AHEAD is slightly below 1000 EUR a round, 35 mm a bit more expensive. Still far cheaper than missiles.
@@jonny2954 Cheaper. But ahead has height restrictions and the radius of use is smaller than that of missiles. And I think, Ahead requires more ground systems, maybe.
@@specialengineer2718 Yes, that's why it's not replacing missiles but rather is part of a larger protection complex. It will be the lowest SHORAD level, above that is IRIS-T. AHEAD is for threats that penetrated the IRIS-T missile shield or for targets that aren't worth the missile. You don't want to waste a 350,000 USD missile for every 4,000 USD drone.
The 30 mm version is also used against Infantry on the Puma IFV.
Its cool, but each round would be very expensive and hard to produce, and considering how fast the 35mm cannnon fires, it will cost thousands just to fire it for 1 second
But, I think, it is cheaper than using rockets
@@specialengineer2718 that is true
Around $300 per round
Less expensive that proximity fuzes commonly used now.
Nice make a new video how works an air gun (pump action)
nice
Thanks
what makes the safety ring detach from the rotor on these fuzes?
The centrifugal force
It´s cool. And if you need a test pilot for the target plane I would be more than happy to offer my mother-in-law for this task. Science requires sacrifice from time to time...
I still want to know how w.e it is at end of barrel is able to program the rounds and be accurate
Using induction coils. The cross-section of the copper wire and the number of turns are selected for the coils. It's very similar to wireless phone charging
@@specialengineer2718 thank-you
Welcome)
Setback Generator of this bullet is diffirent. Could you explain more?
Yes, that was one of the options. But now, for the purpose of unification, the same design is used as in the grenade in my video. There have been many designs of current sources. With the transition to lower power consumption (~1.5V) and the development of electronics, the design of current sources has been modernized to accommodate this.
I plan to make a video reviewing power sources for fuzes, including setback generators.
@@specialengineer2718 great bro. Waiting!
@@specialengineer2718 lets me know if I can help anything!
Ok
What velocity increase is there in the sub-munitions compared to the main round? It's a tiny charge that projects the sub-munitions out the front of the shell.
I ask, because I'm intrigued by just what the energy of these sub-munitions are at different ranges.
I've seen an online chart that suggests the velocity of the main round at maximum range (3500m) is only about 1500 fps. If sub-munitions are projected out the front of that round, what velocity would they be travelling at when they hit the target?
I'd also expect the ballistically inefficient sub-munitions (little cylinders) would slow down pretty quickly (at low, supersonic velocities) after leaving the main round. So, once they've spread out a bit, I'd imagine they'd have slowed down quite noticeably.
It looks to me like, at maximum range, the sub-munitions at point of impact would be little more than 22lr rimfire rounds, in terms of energy.
At closer ranges, they may be more like 5.56mm Nato rounds......which would be a big increase in lethality as the target gets closer.
Just curious.
Yes, projects have a tiny charge. The speed is 1500 fps + 600 fps (maximum). It’s difficult to say exactly, it depends on the mass of the propellant charge, its type (powder) and the design features of the projectile
В рекламе всегда всё хорошо, красиво, эффектно, но вот реальность: th-cam.com/video/SMgquNzmoz8/w-d-xo.html - не могут сбить даже тихоходные иранские дроны.
you would can do more time video and more detailed to not stay doubt
Thanks. I agree with you
$$$$$$???
One viewer said it costs about 1000$
ВОТ!!! Именно про это я и размышлял! Всё думал, НУ ПОЧЕМУ КАРТЕЧЬ НЕ ИСПОЛЬЗУЮТ в борьбе с дронами!? Ну слава тестикулам, додумались ребята.