Sir, i have a doubt, as to what if a person had committed murder and he communicates all the details to his advocate. Then the advocate calls the police and says everything that had been communicated to him by the person. The police takes immediate action and discover a knife on which there are blood stains of victim and fingerprint of the murderer. In this case what will happen???
Advocate gives it's information to police and to court, moreover it's not evidence against the accused what the advocate said to police as its totally hearsay evidence, moreover if without any statement of accused to police, police discover weapon independently then no evidence be used against accused
Sir agar client ko proceeding ke samay advocate se koi problem a rahi hai to vo apni file vapis le kar koi or advocate kar leta hai to purane wala advocate dusri party ke advocate ko apni clients ki kamia bata sakta hai taki vo case har jae.
Sir today I watched your this video first time. Your videos is really helpful for us. Thanks for this video. Sir privilege communication and professional communication same ही है क्या??
Respected sir With due respect i dont agree sec 129 u explained. This sec says that client may b complelled to disclose confidential communication if he offers himself as a witness. Usman abid
Sections 126, 127 and 128 deal with the situation where legal practioners are prohibited to disclose confidential communication whereas Section 129 imposes obligations upon the client not to disclose any confidential communication before the court given by his legal adviser. The disclosure of communication under section 129 should be enforced when it is strictly necessary. “To enable a counsel or solicitor to nip litigation in the bud by timely warning or suggestion, an expert knowledge of the fact is necessary; but if professional communications be embarrassed by any fear of disclosure, advice would have to be given on maimed or distorted statements.” The principle laid down in this section is basically formulated “on exigencies of human affairs.” The effect of the section is that a person cannot be compelled to disclose any confidential communication which has taken place between him and legal professional adviser. Confidential communications between client and advocate have protection from compulsory disclosure. Neither the advocate nor the client is any obligation to spell it to a third person. Hope u get the ponit
Thanx sir thats what i mean too. This is usman abid advocate from pakistan preparing for judicial exam. Getting help from ur lectures coz evidence Act and qanoon e shahad are almost same. God bless u sir
Sir, if accused calls his advocate to disclose his communication for his benefit only some part of their communication , can his advocate be cross examined on the question to expalin what he said or their whole communication Under sec 128 and 129 ?
guru Ji.🙏 As per sec 126 the communication between Advocate and his client is barred from disclosure.if supposing the case is between Advocate and his client as aforesaid can Advocate disclose the confidential communication made in course or for the purpose of employment ??
thanks a lot guru Ji.🙏 one more question under sec 129 the expression provided unless he offers himself as a witness.guruJi.🙏 here party per se becoming a witness or calling a legal advisor as a witness ?
Court can ask any question for the end of justice, if the person himself appeared as a witness than court can compel him to answer the question but not to those question answers of which criminate him for some penalty.
Sir jo apne communication during marriage wali example di thi sir usme judge ke samne husband consent de sakta hai ki bata do agar nahi to judge ko kese pata chalega ki husband ne consent di hai ki tum yeh baat bata do
Good morning sir g Section 128 and section 129 mein same confusion hai wo ye ke agar A ny B ko as an advocate engage nai kiya and bas apny case k facts btaye and bad mein C ko as an advocate engage kar liya .To court mein A as witness B and C dono ko bula sakta hai ya sirf C ko jisy us nay as an advocate engage kiya tha. and B jisy facts btaye thay as an advocate engage nai kiya tha ?Matlab ye k jisy engage kiya wo advocate a sakta hai as witness ya phir jisy engage nai kiya bas case k facts btaye thay wo b a sakta hai ?
Sir sorry to say but the illistrations nd explanation which u have used in sec 124 ,was incorrect. That will apply to 125 124 deals with official communications .means the communication wich happens between officials persons..not the information recieved by others... Eg. If the police persons communicate between them how to raid in perticular place..then the shall not be compelled to disclose the planing communication.... Kindly reply if i am wrong.thnk u
![แฉกลโกงงานวัด 2024 [ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.106 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/taC5dpP3HXA/mqdefault.jpg)
Hello sir ,🙏,all videos are too much good , it's very helpful ,more and more thank you sir,
V nice teaching👍🏻
Sir the way you teach is marvellous. Whole lectures are worth watching thanks a bunch sir
Very good sir
Good lecture sir thanks
You are great, very helpful sir. Thank you.
Thank you sir
Really Helpful 🙏
Overall excellent sir😍
Amazing lecture
Thank you ❤️❤️❤️
Thanks sir ji 🙂
Thank you Paji 😌😌😌😌
Thank you sir 🙏
Thnq
Thanku sir☺
Sir section 130 , 131 and 132 bhi cover kar dijiyr please 🙏🙏🙏🙏
👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻💯
Thku sir😊🙏🏻
Thanks sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thanks u so much sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thankyou sir❤❤
simple and best
Thank you Sir
Which book do you refer while making evidence law videos?
I make my notes after reading 10 books, so then I prepared my notes accordingly
Sir, i have a doubt, as to what if a person had committed murder and he communicates all the details to his advocate. Then the advocate calls the police and says everything that had been communicated to him by the person. The police takes immediate action and discover a knife on which there are blood stains of victim and fingerprint of the murderer. In this case what will happen???
Advocate gives it's information to police and to court, moreover it's not evidence against the accused what the advocate said to police as its totally hearsay evidence, moreover if without any statement of accused to police, police discover weapon independently then no evidence be used against accused
Sir, even if the evidence discovered is so relevant then also it cannot be used against him??
Relevant if it is discovered on the basis of accused's statment
Sir, that means the court "will" not admit the evidence??
@@surajpandey6240 yes
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 sir
Thankyou sir
sir, section 162 ke mutabik document inspect karne ke baad hi pta chalega, ke vo state affair se related hai ya nahi, court kaise inspect kregi..
Nice 👍
Can Rafale deal comes under Section 123?
sir incase police kisi person ka naam ya identity disclose krti hai and govt se rewards dilvaati hai to kya section 125 or 124 me nhi aata
👌👌👌
Good lecture, better to read the whole section of every statute
thnks to u😊
sir in the last part you were saying something about the guidelines but it is not complete. can we get this from google by reading the case?
Sir ek query hai agar person legal advisor se advice le rha hai or agar kisi third person ne hear kar liya to kya wo bared hai ya nhi
No
Thanks sir
Sir agar client ko proceeding ke samay advocate se koi problem a rahi hai to vo apni file vapis le kar koi or advocate kar leta hai to purane wala advocate dusri party ke advocate ko apni clients ki kamia bata sakta hai taki vo case har jae.
Then tere is no solution , but client may file a suit to restrain him to disclose anything to any person, moreover the same fall under 126
Good morning sir,
Pl. let me know about the planing to deliver lecture on CPC.
It's a art, if comes with knowledge and confidence, if u have both u can easily deliver the lecture
Sir today I watched your this video first time.
Your videos is really helpful for us.
Thanks for this video.
Sir privilege communication and professional communication same ही है क्या??
No
Sir sec 125 includes judicial and executive majistrates both?
Sir evidence act starting sections the with case laws honu chaye the
Sir section 130 and 131 ni mil rha h
section 129 ulta bata diya sir apne privilige client ko mili hai ki vo disclose na kare naki legal advisor ko.
sir I want you to make a video regarding case laws under evidence act section wise from sectio 1 to section 167 pls sir
Respected sir
With due respect i dont agree sec 129 u explained.
This sec says that client may b complelled to disclose confidential communication if he offers himself as a witness.
Usman abid
Sections 126, 127 and 128 deal with the situation where legal practioners are prohibited to disclose confidential communication whereas Section 129 imposes obligations upon the client not to disclose any confidential communication before the court given by his legal adviser. The disclosure of communication under section 129 should be enforced when it is strictly necessary. “To enable a counsel or solicitor to nip litigation in the bud by timely warning or suggestion, an expert knowledge of the fact is necessary; but if professional communications be embarrassed by any fear of disclosure, advice would have to be given on maimed or distorted statements.”
The principle laid down in this section is basically formulated “on exigencies of human affairs.” The effect of the section is that a person cannot be compelled to disclose any confidential communication which has taken place between him and legal professional adviser. Confidential communications between client and advocate have protection from compulsory disclosure. Neither the advocate nor the client is any obligation to spell it to a third person.
Hope u get the ponit
Thanx sir thats what i mean too.
This is usman abid advocate from pakistan preparing for judicial exam.
Getting help from ur lectures coz evidence Act and qanoon e shahad are almost same.
God bless u sir
@@TheLawSession welcome brother and I wish you best of luck
Sir, if accused calls his advocate to disclose his communication for his benefit only some part of their communication , can his advocate be cross examined on the question to expalin what he said or their whole communication Under sec 128 and 129 ?
No, without the consent of his client he can't disclose
guru Ji.🙏 As per sec 126 the communication between Advocate and his client is barred from disclosure.if supposing the case is between Advocate and his client as aforesaid can Advocate disclose the confidential communication made in course or for the purpose of employment ??
Not at all, but with the consent of client he can do so
thanks a lot guru Ji.🙏 one more question under sec 129 the expression provided unless he offers himself as a witness.guruJi.🙏 here party per se becoming a witness or calling a legal advisor as a witness ?
Court can ask any question for the end of justice, if the person himself appeared as a witness than court can compel him to answer the question but not to those question answers of which criminate him for some penalty.
Sir jo apne communication during marriage wali example di thi sir usme judge ke samne husband consent de sakta hai ki bata do agar nahi to judge ko kese pata chalega ki husband ne consent di hai ki tum yeh baat bata do
He has to give his consent which is to be proved by wife
Sir apka matlab hai ki wife prove karegi court me ki mere husband ne consent di hai ki tum bata do
Obviously
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thnku sir
Good morning sir g
Section 128 and section 129 mein same confusion hai wo ye ke agar A ny B ko as an advocate engage nai kiya and bas apny case k facts btaye and bad mein C ko as an advocate engage kar liya .To court mein A
as witness B and C dono ko bula sakta hai ya sirf C ko jisy us nay as an advocate engage kiya tha. and B jisy facts btaye thay as an advocate engage nai kiya tha ?Matlab ye k jisy engage kiya wo advocate a sakta hai as witness ya phir jisy engage nai kiya bas case k facts btaye thay wo b a sakta hai ?
He can cl to his advocate only
👍👍👍
Sir sorry to say but the illistrations nd explanation which u have used in sec 124 ,was incorrect.
That will apply to 125
124 deals with official communications .means the communication wich happens between officials persons..not the information recieved by others...
Eg. If the police persons communicate between them how to raid in perticular place..then the shall not be compelled to disclose the planing communication....
Kindly reply if i am wrong.thnk u
130 1 31