The FASCINATING ROLE of the NUMBER 7 in the CREATION ACCOUNT | Genesis 1 & 2 | Bible Study

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @MasterpieceBible
    @MasterpieceBible  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🎬WATCH ME NEXT 🎬
    ✅Why are there TWO creations accounts in the Bible?
    th-cam.com/video/ptx1rtRk99Q/w-d-xo.html
    ✅More FASCINATING Discoveries in the Book of Genesis
    bit.ly/discoveriesingenesis
    ✅7 KEY TIPS for effective Bible Study
    th-cam.com/video/nh7yU64DStw/w-d-xo.html
    SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE
    👉🏼 bit.ly/masterpiece_bible
    HOW DOES THE BIBLE WORK?
    👉🏼 bit.ly/howdoesthebiblework
    MORE FREE RESOURCES FOR YOUR BIBLE STUDY
    👉🏼 www.masterpiece.bible/
    GERMAN CHANNEL
    👉🏼 th-cam.com/users/MasterpieceBibel

  • @SDsc0rch
    @SDsc0rch หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    amazing!

  • @kellymcanally-iu6sx
    @kellymcanally-iu6sx 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Adam-4 + Eve-3 = 7 Letters. 🙂

  • @perochtherese
    @perochtherese 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is really intriguing; I'm just finishing the first draft of a book on thematic patterns in the Bible, and your videos underline and add to the patterns than I have already investigated. Many thanks for your great work!

    • @MasterpieceBible
      @MasterpieceBible  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're welcome! Do let me know when your book is available, would definitely be interested.

  • @bro.joseph7
    @bro.joseph7 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Amen!

  • @LeahRichards
    @LeahRichards 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you, Chris!

    • @MasterpieceBible
      @MasterpieceBible  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're welcome, Leah! Glad you enjoyed the video.

  • @bro.joseph7
    @bro.joseph7 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Oh, also, I was studying a few of these sevens in the creation account a few weeks ago, and, I came across that verse 7, 14, 28 (all multiplications of seven) each have 28 hebrew words each! Take a look at it, it's pretty awesome! Praise God for his perfect Word

  • @Victor-co2xj
    @Victor-co2xj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Ok, I can see here that this video was released less than one hour ago (about 35-40 minutes) and it shows that it has one view thus far. I just watched it. Now, what are the odds? I am a theology professor who is getting ready to leave for campus to teach college students exactly about that topic of creation using exactly those examples, to show how the narrative is carefully constructed in terms of the number seven and its multiples. That helps them see that there is design, pattern and purpose to the account, which is quite unlike the popular idea that the Bible is a rudimentary book of the past. And I am glad someone is noticing this specific literary pattern. Usually this kind of information is completely ignored when people study biblical texts.

    • @MasterpieceBible
      @MasterpieceBible  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Perfect timing, I guess! :) Thanks for watching and commenting! Yes, the Bible is the most amazing book ever written and we must get the word out. Hence this channel. :)

  • @DavidAlgea
    @DavidAlgea 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I keep running into people online commenting that the word heaven(s) is repeated 21 times if you ALSO include the Hebrew word that is translated into "expanse" or "firmament."
    I, however, can't get the math to work out - I keep getting 20. If you go into verse 2:4, you get another use of heaven, making the count 21, but this adjustment seems to disrupt the count for "earth," which should also be 21, according to the commentaries.
    I think people, like our brother here, are referencing this work, "A COMMENTARY ON THE BOOK OF GENESIS" by U. CASSUTO
    Cassuto writes,
    "Each of the three nouns that occur in the first verse and express the basic concepts of the section, viz God [ ‘elohim] heavens [ šamayim], earth [ ’eres] are repeated in the section a given number of times that is a multiple of seven: thus the name of God occurs thirty-five times, that is, five times seven (on the fact that the Divine Name, in one of its forms, occurs seventy times in the first four chapters, see below); earth is found twenty-one times, that is, three times seven; similarly heavens (or firmament, raqia’) appears twenty-one times."
    But I'm stumped at this point and unsure how Cassuto and others cite the number "21" for heaven(s)/Firmament(expanse).
    What I'm thinking, though, is that the author of Genesis is not wanting the total to be 21, but one shy of 21.
    It's the same concept as "and God saw that it was good" is mysteriously absent from the account of when God separates the Heavens above from the Earth below on day 2. (It's not good that God's realm, heaven, is separated from man's realm, earth.) Once the mediator of earth and heaven is made on day 6, Adam, then God surveys all of His creation and pronounces everything "very good." i.e., we now have a mediator between the separated heaven and earth which brings them back into union and then God pronounces His creation "very good." .
    21 would indicate a three-fold perfection. But 20 would mean that we are just one shy of perfection.
    Why is that important? It's only when the mediator ascends into the heavens that the heavens are made perfect. This idea is picked up in Hebrews chapter 9, specifically vs. 23-24, where Jesus perfects the heavenly realm with His own blood.
    So 20, one short of perfection, might be the idea trying to be conveyed in the text.
    Can you confirm and list the verses/uses of the word - "heavens/firmament" in a reply?

  • @timothyasberry3470
    @timothyasberry3470 ปีที่แล้ว

    In biblical numerics 7 is "spiritual completeness" that's what it stands for as well as 40..in biblical numerics means "probation" 3 the trinity and I can go on and on and on and on but I won't.. I think y'all get it👍💯🙏

  • @YeshuaSaves3
    @YeshuaSaves3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My battery is at 77% as I watch this 🤔

  • @vacaloca5575
    @vacaloca5575 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Everything you say about the 7's is very interesting, but you made a small mistake in saying that God started creating in Gen 1:3. It's obviously in 1:1, of course.

  • @serenacn748
    @serenacn748 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Is this really relevant when the fact is that the original text of the OT and NT was not English?

    • @MasterpieceBible
      @MasterpieceBible  17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@serenacn748 Everything in the video is based on the Hebrew text, not the English one.

  • @danielpech6521
    @danielpech6521 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is only of humans that Genesis 1 does not specify any material source. From a pedestrian secular reading, this would be taken to be a simple absence of information as to their material source. But a Hebrew Priestly reading knows better. It also ought to know better even of v. 1:
    1. the general cosmos and the special Earth.
    2. The Earth, as its own general subject, implying that which we all intuit is most valuable about the Earth unto itself in all the cosmos: its abiding maximal abundance of open liquid water.
    3. that water and its special relation to the Sun's light, hence the water cycle;
    4. The water cycle and its special beneficiary and member, biology;
    5. biology and its special category, animal biology (plant/animal/mineral = animal);
    6. Animal biology and its special category, human;
    7. The man and his wife (Genesis 2:21-23)
    In this seven-fold recursion, we can see a suggestion even that Man and Woman are not to be created at the same time, but, rather, at respective times, and with very particular respective and complementarian purposes.
    The sevenfold recursion shows that even Genesis 1:1 is entirely concerned that, since we humans are the creation of the Living God, we not only are not insignificant, we are the central value both of the entire account and the entire cosmos. More so, this recursion fits Genesis 1's conspicuous lack of mention only of humans' material origins. This (A) poses humans as transcending the Earth and (B) anticipates the completion forward of Genesis 1. Per the 7th recursion, this is fulfilled in the ending portion of Genesis 2 (vs. 18-23).
    The merismus in v. 1 is not---repeat, not---a 'fancy' Hebrew surrogate for 'everything'. Yet it rightly serves that purpose. And, as shown by this recursion, its best service of that purpose is that within its own more deep purpose.
    .