Dear Friends, If you like my find my videos worthwhile, please share them with your friends and subscribe to the channel. I welcome your comments, but please use civil language. Uncivil langue does not make you more convincing. There is no problem if you want to disagree with me or the guest, but please do so without being disagreeable. If you wish to give an opposing view, please send me your contact details. If you want to see my most popular videos, here are the links to them. th-cam.com/video/hWJugbilQd8/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/hRDiEe90z6Y/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/sqHGMhJkygc/w-d-xo.html You are welcome to follow me on Facebook and Twitter. facebook.com/shakil.chaudary twitter.com/ShakChaudhary
why he has not mentioned Razakar's atrocities on hindus and their woman ? like rape kill etc..there are many contradictions in his speech. Why does then palestines doing jihad in israel valid if hyderabad's annexation is invalid..what was nokhali genocde and direct action day. rotten jihadi religion
Jinnah has done what your Pigamber was doing. Islam is convoluted perverted satanic and evil ideology. Both Abrahamic and Ibrahamic cults thrive on other’s misery and threw the new converts into perpetual dark ages. Only after the French Revolution did Europe come out with liberty equality and fraternity with secularism and free speech. Only then the clergies were decapitated and debilitated from state power from hounding others in the name of blasphemy and paganism. Islam is still under darkness.
That's why they created a state of loot & corruption now going door to door for few billions dollars with a begging bowl. हमने पाकिस्तान की सारी हेकड़ी निकल दी, उसे कटोरा लेकर दुनिया भर में घूमने के लिए मजबूर कर दिया - नरेंद्र मोदी
Cunning Jinnah wanted Muslims to not have a Hindu leadership ruling them but was strangely okay with Hindus of Hyderabad under a Muslim rule (dictator). In the process he caused the loss of Hindu lives in thousands in addition to the millions that were lost due to his direct violence day.
Bhai ye kisi ke sage nahi ho Sakate Jo apni baden ko chodate hain unse bishwas kark khud ke pair me kulhadi marna ye Kitana bhi pad likh lain sale hain to bahen chod he ye baden chodana nahi chhod Sakate fir inse umeed Karna bekufi hai
I could smell the hatered against kafirs and hypocrisy in every words and arguments of each and every Pakistani. Note: Pakistan was is and will not be a territory, it was is will be a mindset of islamic separatism which is the basic principle of ISLAM.
Typical Pakistan mind... "Hum kabza kare to sahi, koi aur Kare to galat". Shakel sir tried so much to keep him sane.... But Dr yakkob is like" hum nai sudhrenge"😂😂😂
Balochistan became independent on August 11 and Jinnah fought the case for the independence of Balochistan in London and Jinnah had taken gold equal to his weight as a fee. The Assembly of Balochistan herself had talked about meeting with India, but Maulana Azad refused and the same Jinnah sent the army and captured it.
Thank you. Very few know this. Also Gwaddar was offerred to India by Oman for around 3 crore rupees. Nehru refused and Pakistan bought it. Coco island was gifted to Myanmar free. China is building a base there. Chacha Nehru is stupid beyond imagination.
Percentage of Hindus in Sindh :- 1941 Census - 30% Now - 5% Percentage of Hindus in NPWF . 1941 Census - 7% Now - 0% Percentage of Hindus & Sikhs in Punjab - 1941 Census - 14% After Punjab partition - 1.3% Now - 0.19% Hinu population in Bangladesh :- In 1947 - 30% Now - 8% . Pakistan constitution officially discriminate minorities 26 times. Segregation and Apartheid on basis of religion is part of constitution and institutions. Represation of minority is null. Pakistan state policy is "No minorities no discrimination" Muslims lynched thousand of Hindus because they wanted justice for thier converted 10 to 12 years old girls.
India needs more of such Pakistanis….or else when they start talking peace one gets scared that Indians will commit the mistake of being softhearted towards them and believe their peace gestures😅😅😅 I salute bangash for keeping Pakistan alive.
even after 1000 years, Bangash will not get Junagarh, keep dreaming new fantastic escapades. Shame on Lakshmi Mittal for sponsoring his scholarship. all praise to Jinnah, he took away these useless people with him to a new country.
Shakil saheb, Quite a unique guest. His footing is based on the the common Pakistani belief, “Pakistan is an Islamic country but India MUST stay secular”. His hypothesis appears deeply influenced by Dr Ayesha Jalal. His inferences have their roots in selective picking of writings of that time (almost like Dr Jalal). He in fact discards writings of the leaders of the time en mass. With his academic credentials I was looking forward to a more insightful analysis. He tried to to give a different perspective but it held very less water. Always wishing you the best 🙏
Another super intelligent person sitting in Pakistan showing the supernatural knowledge. Kehan kehan se dhoondh k laate hei? Or may be everyone is as intelligent… sab Jhooth 75 years baad yeh Banda sachcha
Jinnah was just eyeing on the huge wealth of Nizam of Hyderabad and he has no soft corners for muslims of Hyderabad and other parts of India . He ditched them all and now whole pakistan is paying for this .Pakistan is begging for money on all doors of the world.
Guest says - suddenly the two nation theory became one nation theory. Thanks to Jinnah's speech in Parliament which primarily was to woo the Americans and west to give them a taste of secularism and democracy. Fine! Did it truly became one nation? Did the East Pakistan ever felt that way. The rape and plunder that followed in 70s and the shameful surrender is evident that the theory had no substance. Does the guest think that `the Hyderabad V Kashmir` offer was simultaneously written by 4 important politicians at the same time and described the same outcome? Was this a mere co-incidence or far fetched. In my opinion it was a beginning of comedy of errors, that continues till date.
What Yaqoob Bangash and his friends wanted was not implementation of a 2-nation theory, but lordship and rule of Hindus and other non-Muslims by the Muslims. The blood of millions is on the hands of Jinnah and his supporters.
In reality Jinnah just wanted to get Hyderabad by negotiations . He was of the view that if he gets Hyderabad by negotiations he will forcefully occupy the Kashmir and he even tried this by sending Rajakars to kashmir.
Not many people know the current Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge's mother and sister were burnt alive by the Razakaars. He was barely 7 then, but he escaped.
Mr bangash is making false claim about massacre of muslim in hyderabad The rajakars under hyderabad ruler massacred about 100000 hindus. Then only sardar patel intervened with army to rescue hyderabad. The pakistNis...so called intellectuals distorted history. There is no doubt about it.
How come almost every Pak Fullbright 'Scholar' is an excellent manipulator. Are they conducting exams to measure Manupulation Ability for admissions to US Unis? Or is it that 'Parchee' happens at all levels in Pak even in Colleges and Universities. And this time the Parchee happens to be issued by Millitary and Beaureaucracy 😜
India is a Idea of more then 10000 year old. This man does not know anything about India. Hyderabad state came much letter then Satvahan and Rastrakut and Chalukyas Yadav etc. The geographic unity of India is given in Rigveda . The land which is north of Ocean and south of snowy Himalaya is Bharat. The cultural unity of India is a time immemorial facts. Tell this man that Shri Adi Shankaracharya travelled from all the way to Travancore to Kashmir and every corner of this country. The Sharda peet temple of Kashmir was established by Shri Adi Shankaracharya only .
LOL, you have no idea of the Rig-Ved and BTW the author of the Vishnu Purana(when he made that quote) had no idea about lands coterminous with Pakistan, he made that clear in book of Karna Parva.Regards Gangadeshi
Yaqoob Bangash like people consider Arabic as their culture, Arabic man muhhamad as their idol person, islamic Invaders as their heros and QURAN AND HADITHS as their scientific book and kafir as their VILLIAN. 😂
If I would have listened more to Bangesh, he would have convinced me that Dosa was invented in Pakistan and South Indians took over it, and din't bother to give Pakistanis the due credit.
1. Dr Banges says that Muslim league believed that minorities are not safe in Hindu India, BUT Hindus will live happily in an Islamic Pakistan. But we see minorities are oppressed in Pakistan not by the society but by the Pakistani state itself. It shows Muslim league is nothing but a communal and radical force which remains a huge influencer in Pak society. 2. Dr Banges further explains that 2-nation theory was valid till the creation of Pakistan not further. Then why does Pakistani political leadership even today harp on Kashmir Banega Pakistan. What I gather from Pakistani social media platforms is that people in Pakistan still hugely desire to have Kashmir just because it is muslim majority. I would say 2-nation theory still stays in the Pakistani psyche, thus stays as an important in the domestic politics of Pakistan. Pakistani state still spends huge resources to create a false narrative that Muslims in India are being oppressed. Is it so that establishment in Pakistan still see their existence on the cruches of 2-nation theory?
Muslims are under threat and persecution in India because we in Pakistan see many people indulging in hate speech, demolishing mosques, calling for social boycott of Muslims , even national government do not condemn these instances . It is a realty . we (Pakistanis) are not perfect when it comes to treatment of minorities ,but our political leadership does not preach hate against non Muslims like BJP doing in against non Hindus (Christians and Muslims ).
@@sikandarkamboh5221 1. Your constitution does not allow non-Muslims to be President, PM, COAS, CJP. Indian constitution not only allows non-Hindus to hold these posts but they HAVE held these posts. 2. Hindu population of Pakistan at time of partition was 24%. It is 2% now. Muslim population of India was 9% in 1947 and is 18% now. 3. There have been bomb blasts in Pakiatan in mozque while pwople were doing namaz. That hasn't happened. In India. So much for Muslims being safe in Pakistan. 4. There have been dozens of non-Hinodus in Indian cricket team including at least 4 non-Hindu captains. There were only 2 in Pakistani team. Both were asked to convert. Yousuf Yohanna converted and continued to be in the team. The Hindu player who refused to convert was pushed out of the team on fake excuse. 5. Thousands of Hindu girls are kidnapped and forcibly converted in Pakistan. The police don't even register an FIR. No one is forcibly converting Muslim girls in India. Muslims who have talent and work hard have reachex the top be it movie stars, singers, music directors, industrialists, lyricists, classical music singers and players etc. They could not progress to the top if at early stage itself they had faced discrimination.
@@sikandarkamboh5221 oh really islam itself called kill non Muslim in the names of jihad convert people jizya OK so please don't say anything wrong here OK
Ranjit Singh na hota ...oo pakistani jahil ..mharaja Ranjit Singh na hote bolo ...give him some respect ..aj jha rule kr rhe ho ..wo area unhi ka bnaya hai ..
Mr. Bangash should correct his views. Myth :- Nawab for Junagadh signed accession in favour of Pakistan, how could it be revoked ? Fact - Actually, it was not a question of revocation. Looking to the public pressure, Nawab flew away to Pakistan, emptying the state treasury of its cash and securities, rather than defending his position. He knew his position was not tenable. Besides Junagadh was not a state contiguous with Pakistan, unlike J&K. Pakistan had indeed claimed the accession of Junagadh as final and irrevocable on account of the nature of the instrument something it does not agree to with respect to J&K, for which the Instrument of Accession was signed in favour of India ! There are several interesting episodes related to Junagadh. The Nawab of Junagadh also claimed overlordship of Babariawad and Mangrol. They had signed the Instrument of Accession in favour of India on 18 September 1947 . The Nawab of Junagadh sought to have the accession revoked, but it was held that revocation was unlawful, accession being a one-way street. Nawab then sent his troops to Babariawad to assert his claim. Writes C Dasgupta in his book, ‘War and Diplomacy in Kashmir 1947-48’: “At the end of September [1947], the Indian government decided that a show of force was unavoidable. Sardar Patel pointed out that by sending its armed personnel into Babariawad, Junagadh had committed an act of war against India.The princely state which had acceded to India had a right to expect that India would protect them against aggression."
The idea of India had been around for thousands of years before BC, and its people were fully aware of their own Bharatvarsha/Aryawrat.. much later around 550 BC Vishu Puran mentioned it clearly saying ...........उत्तरं यत्समुद्रस्य हिमाद्रेश्चैव दक्षिणम्। वर्षं तद्भारतं नाम भारती यत्र सन्ततिः।। (Meaning - The country that lies north of the ocean,and south of the snowy mountains is called Bhárata, for there dwelt the descendants of Bharata.) Lahori Churan must-read book by Diana L. Eck titled "India: A Sacred Geography" . The notion of Rashtra (it's been around for almost 6000 years in India) is far different from the nation-state concept that originated in Europe, we are bound by our sacred geography, not by bigoted religions but by Dharma. It's too much to understand for Yakub.
*India ne pressure daalke, treachery se, princely states ko India mein annex karwaye . Lekin Khan of Kalat ko pyaar se Jinnah Sahab ne accession karwaya* 😂😂😂
Arre this guy doesnot know that kashmir was offered to Pakistan by both nehru and sardar. They just wanted that they forget abt junagadh and Hyderabad. It was fair deal. Jinnah didnot accept deal and accepted accession of junagadh. That was mistake as that erodes trust if any and he was punished for it in all 3 states. And they managed to get part of kashmir and lost everything else
36:04 Someone should tell this genius that the freedom struggle (revolutionary or satyagreh) were performed by people of these very Riasat against the colonialism of Britain that time. It was people who wanted freedom from the oppression of the Maharajas aiding British and the British themselves. Concepts of getting back under a maharaja/dictatorship would never had existed, “even in your conceptual hind side theory”. All thanks to sardar Patel who United the republic of India. And yes, if he was that stronger as you point out, there would have been no Pakistan There’s a word in Urdu that I can resonate your theory is “munafaqat”. Defending all fraudulent views in favor of creation of Pakistan and digression of same for India. Hypocrisy at its best. Bravo 👏🏼
If Patel did not have been Intervented all Hindus could have butchered by razakar Yaqoob bangash looks to be madrsa chaap intellektual enjoying USA freedom
Sardar Patel in his speech in Kolkata on 18 Jan 1948 " Kashmir is part of India and we will not let an inch of Kashmir to go with Pakistan if they (pakistan) wants an open and full-fledged war we are ready for this "
Someone should ASK this --- "Mr. Counter-factual" or "Mr. Hindsight" ... Bangash saheb - What happens if Jinnah had gone "Upstairs" (he was a Whisky-totz guy!!) 10 years earlier...?? 😂
Freedom movement of India was to librate Hindustan. freedom fighters sacrifice was not aimed to restore Raje - Rajwade . winners were freedom fighters who secured victory of land from british. British had no right to impose clauses of returning ownership to Gulam royals ,because war for freedom from british was not fought by them .
Such a low level of academic standards. The foundation of any serious academic study is honesty. This guy is in a completely different pole. Thanks Mr. Shakil to expose such people.
Mr. Bangash should correct his views. Myth :- Nawab for Junagadh signed accession in favour of Pakistan, how could it be revoked ? Fact - Actually, it was not a question of revocation. Looking to the public pressure, Nawab flew away to Pakistan, emptying the state treasury of its cash and securities, rather than defending his position. He knew his position was not tenable. Besides Junagadh was not a state contiguous with Pakistan, unlike J&K. Pakistan had indeed claimed the accession of Junagadh as final and irrevocable on account of the nature of the instrument something it does not agree to with respect to J&K, for which the Instrument of Accession was signed in favour of India ! There are several interesting episodes related to Junagadh. The Nawab of Junagadh also claimed overlordship of Babariawad and Mangrol. They had signed the Instrument of Accession in favour of India on 18 September 1947 . The Nawab of Junagadh sought to have the accession revoked, but it was held that revocation was unlawful, accession being a one-way street. Nawab then sent his troops to Babariawad to assert his claim. Writes C Dasgupta in his book, ‘War and Diplomacy in Kashmir 1947-48’: “At the end of September [1947], the Indian government decided that a show of force was unavoidable. Sardar Patel pointed out that by sending its armed personnel into Babariawad, Junagadh had committed an act of war against India.The princely state which had acceded to India had a right to expect that India would protect them against aggression."
Yaqoob is disingenous to quote the only secular speech 11th Aug 1947. In all other speeches and actions, Jinnah was communal. Who gave this fool a Doctorate?
India crushed Razakars in Operation POLO is a fact, but to understand why we had to do it just imagine radicals in power slaughtering innocent civilians in Telangana, present-day Marathwada just coz they are in power, so by natural laws, Indian forces on the order of Patel decided to give them a taste of their own medicine.
Basically Jinnah wanted Muslim rulers in all Muslim majority areas. Convenience was his principle. Sardar Patel figured out his BS and broke his legs in Hyderabad and Kashmir
Sir, the Hyderabad issue can't be equated to a personal home. The ruler was not democratically elected. He had no right to take decision unilaterally...
THIS GUY MUST MUST HAVE NOT HEARD OF MARATHAS OR IS WILLFULLY IGNORING THEM CAUSE UNDER THE MARATHAS INDIA STARTED FROM KERALA IN SOUTH TO KASHMIR TO NORTH,BENGAL FROM EAST TO AFGHANISTAN IN THE WEST.HE IS CLEARLY PARROTING COLONIAL PERCEPTIONS ABOUT INDIA AND HINDUS WITH AN PUNJABI DANGAR ACCENT.
Jinnah played poker hoping muslim ruled princely states like Junagadh, Hyderabad and Bhopal. For Kashmir he thought ruler is not important. He lost 4-0 and most Pakistani feel the pain. They forget that 50 percent plus population of Lahore City and Karachi was non Muslim.
Right!! Jinnah did get PK - but not the kind of PK or IN that he wanted. And by virtue of the fact that after 75 years PK is a failed state and IN is a thriving country - he has proven himself to be a loser in the eyes of history. He was a divider not a uniter. And he has been a net detractor of the Muslim cause as predicted by Mulana Azad.
@@ShyamKumar-zb2mw Jinnah was a lawyer representing Nawabs who were incharge of Muslim League and they wanteed to maintain their land holding status. So he bargained for them and as he became popular he declared himself leader. He had no vision, no policies and no principles.
Kisne bola iss burbok Dr. ko India past me nehi tha. India hajaro Saal se hai or rahega. Iss burbok Dr.ko asli history parana chahiye as every Pakistani read the fake history.
No contradiction he expressed himself very clealry/effectively and punctured Mr Shakils pre-conceived notions about what transpired during partition of (British India's) Punjab/Bengal.Regards Mandircchaap.
This guy doesn't even have basic etiquettes. He is saying ' Ranjit Singh na hota '. Iss ko itni bhi tameez nahi ki 'maharaja Ranjitsingh ' kahen, wo bhi jab ki Aaj pak khud maharaja ki zameen par khada hai.
He's talking as if Nizam's Hyderabad was a model government. His rezakars committed untold atrocities on Hindus who were treated as dhimmis. This guy is justifying everything on the grounds that nobody could have foreseen the outcome.
Too late to argue now. Mr Nehru messed up so many things. Not only did they (Nehru, Abul Kalam Azad etc) refuse Kalat's proposal to accession to India, they told the paks, putting the kalat leaders' lives in danger. Not sure if the paks neutralised them with that info from our side. We ie nahru etc betrayed kalat leaders' after refusing their accession.
If Jinnah was such an intelligent and pragmatic person then why he could not foresee his painful death on the hot and polluted roads of Karachi and was brought almost dead to hospital for formalties.
This mindset that Bharat is the product of Britishers conscious effort to stitch the country together or Bharat is the benign & traumatic product of British Colonialism is totally wrong. Although there were 584 princely states but commonality of civilizational entity & Sub-conscious political identity was always there & 91% of the population were believers of (Jambu Dweepe, Bharat khande, Aaryavarthe & Bhaarat Varshe - Which comes from vedas). It is the idea which matters.
Nonsense, no common civilization ,body of thought, or culture encompassing WHOLE of SA exists, the Vedas themselves are deeply at odds with each other, bottomline so-called idea of India is almost entirely an British colonial construct (though to be fair the Moghuls did play their role).
Mr. Bangash should correct his views. Myth :- Nawab for Junagadh signed accession in favour of Pakistan, how could it be revoked ? Fact - Actually, it was not a question of revocation. Looking to the public pressure, Nawab flew away to Pakistan, emptying the state treasury of its cash and securities, rather than defending his position. He knew his position was not tenable. Besides Junagadh was not a state contiguous with Pakistan, unlike J&K. Pakistan had indeed claimed the accession of Junagadh as final and irrevocable on account of the nature of the instrument something it does not agree to with respect to J&K, for which the Instrument of Accession was signed in favour of India ! There are several interesting episodes related to Junagadh. The Nawab of Junagadh also claimed overlordship of Babariawad and Mangrol. They had signed the Instrument of Accession in favour of India on 18 September 1947 . The Nawab of Junagadh sought to have the accession revoked, but it was held that revocation was unlawful, accession being a one-way street. Nawab then sent his troops to Babariawad to assert his claim. Writes C Dasgupta in his book, ‘War and Diplomacy in Kashmir 1947-48’: “At the end of September [1947], the Indian government decided that a show of force was unavoidable. Sardar Patel pointed out that by sending its armed personnel into Babariawad, Junagadh had committed an act of war against India.The princely state which had acceded to India had a right to expect that India would protect them against aggression."
TURKON ne Arabic language me Yaqoob Bangash ki DADIJAAN ko raat ki andhere me lantern laga ke QURAN AND HADITHS ki kafir se pyar karne wali enlightened verse padhaya aur Yaqoob ki DADIJAAN muhhamad ko FIL de baitha. 😂
Nazism - Racial purity of World Islamism - Religious purity of World .. According to Quran , Surah Al Baqra 221.... And do not marry polytheistic women until they believe. And a believing slave woman is better than a polytheist, even though she might please you. And do not marry polytheistic men [to your women] until they believe. And a believing slave is better than a polytheist, even though he might please you. Those invite [you] to the Fire, but Allāh invites to Paradise and to forgiveness, by His permission. And He makes clear His verses [i.e., ordinances] to the people that perhaps they may remember. - Saheeh International My points :- (1) The most hated word in the human history of this civilization comes from Qur'an name "Mushriqeens". So call any muslim mushriq then check his reaction. (2) There is no freedom of speech or limited FOS , freedom of thought , freedom of artistic expression , freedom of the press , equality of peoples a non-Muslim, a Kafir, is never equal to a Muslim , no equal protection under Sharia for different classes of people. Justice is dualistic, with one set of laws for Muslim males and different laws for women and non-Muslims in almost all muslim nation. Even Cairo declaration openly opposed United Nations human declaration.
This guest says that if sardar patel would have died earlier, it's boundaries would have been different. I say if jinnah would have died earlier due to his TB, there would have been no Pakistan 🙄. As it is, Paxtan is a non concept!
Here‘s a guy who doesn’t put up the pappy-jhappy I wanna be friends with India show! Good for him. At least he doesn’t lie. Most of the wanna be friends with India guys are actually need to be friends of India folks. Bhagwan na kare par agar kal ko agar P‘stan phir se khada hota hai, toh yeh sab phir ghazwa-e-hind shuru kar denge.
Dr. Bangash's particular angle of view & interpretation enables him to work & prosper within Pakistani academia. However, as made amply clear by the usual incisive questioning of Mr. Chaudhary, it does appear that, more often than not, the Bangash-argument is more focused on clever wording, having a definite undercurrent of a strong bias towards one party, and therefore not entirely presenting an objective big picture of affairs.
Indians watching this channel (it is usually Indians who seem to be thirsty for knowledge) ; please answer this question : Compare how you felt as an Indian voter before 2014 and how you feel as an Indian voter in 2024. Who has given you the most returns for your vote?
A large portion of Bangash sahab clarification is based on that theories, which were not existing at that time. Overall a very good treatment of tuberculosis in the year 1947,in India. Thanks.
Further on my last update it appears to me that Mr. Bangash regrets of non balkalization of India. He says that there are many small inedepent states in Europe and so India could have many small independent states. But for Pakistan he justifies forced occupation of Balochistan. Also, he says that had Pakistan sent tank than it had got Ksahmir. Again he is defying his own logic of existence of independent states. This historian is full of contradictions. I also find that apart from contradictions, his logics are very weak.
Dear Friends,
If you like my find my videos worthwhile, please share them with your friends and subscribe to the channel.
I welcome your comments, but please use civil language. Uncivil langue does not make you more convincing. There is no problem if you want to disagree with me or the guest, but please do so without being disagreeable. If you wish to give an opposing view, please send me your contact details.
If you want to see my most popular videos, here are the links to them.
th-cam.com/video/hWJugbilQd8/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/hRDiEe90z6Y/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/sqHGMhJkygc/w-d-xo.html
You are welcome to follow me on Facebook and Twitter.
facebook.com/shakil.chaudary
twitter.com/ShakChaudhary
why he has not mentioned Razakar's atrocities on hindus and their woman ? like rape kill etc..there are many contradictions in his speech. Why does then palestines doing jihad in israel valid if hyderabad's annexation is invalid..what was nokhali genocde and direct action day. rotten jihadi religion
this guy heeds to talk with india scholars to clarify his doubt
How this man got full bright 😳😳😳🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Shakil Saheb, you should have asked him whether Pak was/is supporting Kashmiri, Khalistani
"Freedom Struggle" only MORALLY ?
Jinnah has done what your Pigamber was doing. Islam is convoluted perverted satanic and evil ideology. Both Abrahamic and Ibrahamic cults thrive on other’s misery and threw the new converts into perpetual dark ages. Only after the French Revolution did Europe come out with liberty equality and fraternity with secularism and free speech. Only then the clergies were decapitated and debilitated from state power from hounding others in the name of blasphemy and paganism. Islam is still under darkness.
Hyderabad should have been free, Travancore should have been free, but Balochistan must join Pakistan. What a logic?
Pakistani churan is on another level. These guys stopped thinking.
Social media Aya tab pata chala ye kitne bevakuf log the aur he
That's why they created a state of loot & corruption now going door to door for few billions dollars with a begging bowl.
हमने पाकिस्तान की सारी हेकड़ी निकल दी, उसे कटोरा लेकर दुनिया भर में घूमने के लिए मजबूर कर दिया - नरेंद्र मोदी
Cunning Jinnah wanted Muslims to not have a Hindu leadership ruling them but was strangely okay with Hindus of Hyderabad under a Muslim rule (dictator). In the process he caused the loss of Hindu lives in thousands in addition to the millions that were lost due to his direct violence day.
Bhai ye kisi ke sage nahi ho Sakate Jo apni baden ko chodate hain unse bishwas kark khud ke pair me kulhadi marna ye Kitana bhi pad likh lain sale hain to bahen chod he ye baden chodana nahi chhod Sakate fir inse umeed Karna bekufi hai
I could smell the hatered against kafirs and hypocrisy in every words and arguments of each and every Pakistani.
Note: Pakistan was is and will not be a territory, it was is will be a mindset of islamic separatism which is the basic principle of ISLAM.
Typical Pakistan mind... "Hum kabza kare to sahi, koi aur Kare to galat". Shakel sir tried so much to keep him sane.... But Dr yakkob is like" hum nai sudhrenge"😂😂😂
Balochistan became independent on August 11 and Jinnah fought the case for the independence of Balochistan in London and Jinnah had taken gold equal to his weight as a fee. The Assembly of Balochistan herself had talked about meeting with India, but Maulana Azad refused and the same Jinnah sent the army and captured it.
Thank you. Very few know this. Also Gwaddar was offerred to India by Oman for around 3 crore rupees. Nehru refused and Pakistan bought it. Coco island was gifted to Myanmar free. China is building a base there. Chacha Nehru is stupid beyond imagination.
Percentage of Hindus in Sindh :-
1941 Census - 30%
Now - 5%
Percentage of Hindus in NPWF .
1941 Census - 7%
Now - 0%
Percentage of Hindus & Sikhs in Punjab -
1941 Census - 14%
After Punjab partition - 1.3%
Now - 0.19%
Hinu population in Bangladesh :-
In 1947 - 30%
Now - 8% .
Pakistan constitution officially discriminate minorities 26 times. Segregation and Apartheid on basis of religion is part of constitution and institutions.
Represation of minority is null.
Pakistan state policy is "No minorities no discrimination"
Muslims lynched thousand of Hindus because they wanted justice for thier converted 10 to 12 years old girls.
With all this conversation my gratitude towards Sardar Patel has increased manyfolds
Listen last one minute it's conculsion of this discussion I heard it ten times .
India needs more of such Pakistanis….or else when they start talking peace one gets scared that Indians will commit the mistake of being softhearted towards them and believe their peace gestures😅😅😅 I salute bangash for keeping Pakistan alive.
He is telling kazim rashvi was good no he was Katil for hindus
Jinnah had no idea what he was doing and what will happen once he gets Pakistan. It was an inevitable destiny of Islam here.
MY GOD WHERE DID YOU GET HOLD OF THIS JAAHIL?
This discussion shows how mature we’re Indian leaders particularly Sardar Patel
What were the razakars doing in Hyderabad before the police action?
even after 1000 years, Bangash will not get Junagarh, keep dreaming new fantastic escapades. Shame on Lakshmi Mittal for sponsoring his scholarship. all praise to Jinnah, he took away these useless people with him to a new country.
Shakil saheb, Quite a unique guest. His footing is based on the the common Pakistani belief, “Pakistan is an Islamic country but India MUST stay secular”. His hypothesis appears deeply influenced by Dr Ayesha Jalal. His inferences have their roots in selective picking of writings of that time (almost like Dr Jalal). He in fact discards writings of the leaders of the time en mass. With his academic credentials I was looking forward to a more insightful analysis. He tried to to give a different perspective but it held very less water. Always wishing you the best 🙏
Another super intelligent person sitting in Pakistan showing the supernatural knowledge. Kehan kehan se dhoondh k laate hei? Or may be everyone is as intelligent… sab Jhooth 75 years baad yeh Banda sachcha
Jinnah was just eyeing on the huge wealth of Nizam of Hyderabad and he has no soft corners for muslims of Hyderabad and other parts of India . He ditched them all and now whole pakistan is paying for this .Pakistan is begging for money on all doors of the world.
Guest says - suddenly the two nation theory became one nation theory. Thanks to Jinnah's speech in Parliament which primarily was to woo the Americans and west to give them a taste of secularism and democracy. Fine!
Did it truly became one nation? Did the East Pakistan ever felt that way. The rape and plunder that followed in 70s and the shameful surrender is evident that the theory had no substance.
Does the guest think that `the Hyderabad V Kashmir` offer was simultaneously written by 4 important politicians at the same time and described the same outcome? Was this a mere co-incidence or far fetched. In my opinion it was a beginning of comedy of errors, that continues till date.
He argued on perceptions and avoided facts.
People like Bangash are specially abled, they can lie straight-faced😂. Thank God, people like him àre in Pakistan.
Actually, most Indians are now happy that Jihadi politics was kept out of India.
What Yaqoob Bangash and his friends wanted was not implementation of a 2-nation theory, but lordship and rule of Hindus and other non-Muslims by the Muslims. The blood of millions is on the hands of Jinnah and his supporters.
After two nation theory the identity of Pakistani people are Arabic, Iranian, and central Asian excluding Punjabi, sindho, kp, Baloch etc.
Rather than the history of partition, it was wishful fantasy of Bangash. A tutorial from Ishtiaq Ahmed would do him good.
In reality Jinnah just wanted to get Hyderabad by negotiations . He was of the view that if he gets Hyderabad by negotiations he will forcefully occupy the Kashmir and he even tried this by sending Rajakars to kashmir.
That’s right
I did not know that mere extreme and intense hatred for india can get a Ph.D degree from Oxford university !
Basically, funded by Indian billionaire in Harvard.
Not many people know the current Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge's mother and sister were burnt alive by the Razakaars. He was barely 7 then, but he escaped.
Mr bangash is making false claim about massacre of muslim in hyderabad The rajakars under hyderabad ruler massacred about 100000 hindus. Then only sardar patel intervened with army to rescue hyderabad. The pakistNis...so called intellectuals distorted history. There is no doubt about it.
Very sorry to say that Pakistani enlighten are still not up to the mark, so they'll repent or they are repenting breaking united India.
How come almost every Pak Fullbright 'Scholar' is an excellent manipulator.
Are they conducting exams to measure Manupulation Ability for admissions to US Unis?
Or is it that 'Parchee' happens at all levels in Pak even in Colleges and Universities. And this time the Parchee happens to be issued by Millitary and Beaureaucracy 😜
Guest is totally confused and biased to the core. Certainly fit to qualify as Dr. ( PhD)
India is a Idea of more then 10000 year old. This man does not know anything about India. Hyderabad state came much letter then Satvahan and Rastrakut and Chalukyas Yadav etc.
The geographic unity of India is given in Rigveda . The land which is north of Ocean and south of snowy Himalaya is Bharat. The cultural unity of India is a time immemorial facts. Tell this man that Shri Adi Shankaracharya travelled from all the way to Travancore to Kashmir and every corner of this country. The Sharda peet temple of Kashmir was established by Shri Adi Shankaracharya only .
LOL, you have no idea of the Rig-Ved and BTW the author of the Vishnu Purana(when he made that quote) had no idea about lands coterminous with Pakistan, he made that clear in book of Karna Parva.Regards Gangadeshi
Yaqoob Bangash like people consider Arabic as their culture, Arabic man muhhamad as their idol person, islamic Invaders as their heros and QURAN AND HADITHS as their scientific book and kafir as their VILLIAN. 😂
Man like him are most probably writers of pakistan study books😢😢
Nobody saved anything but India left bcoz of radical Islamist 😂😂
The day Nawab of Junagadh Ran away to Pakistan, Junagadh automatically became part of India. Maharaja of Kashmir never left Kashmir
If I would have listened more to Bangesh, he would have convinced me that Dosa was invented in Pakistan and South Indians took over it, and din't bother to give Pakistanis the due credit.
VAH VAH BANGASH SAHIB 😀
1. Dr Banges says that Muslim league believed that minorities are not safe in Hindu India, BUT Hindus will live happily in an Islamic Pakistan. But we see minorities are oppressed in Pakistan not by the society but by the Pakistani state itself. It shows Muslim league is nothing but a communal and radical force which remains a huge influencer in Pak society.
2. Dr Banges further explains that 2-nation theory was valid till the creation of Pakistan not further. Then why does Pakistani political leadership even today harp on Kashmir Banega Pakistan. What I gather from Pakistani social media platforms is that people in Pakistan still hugely desire to have Kashmir just because it is muslim majority. I would say 2-nation theory still stays in the Pakistani psyche, thus stays as an important in the domestic politics of Pakistan.
Pakistani state still spends huge resources to create a false narrative that Muslims in India are being oppressed. Is it so that establishment in Pakistan still see their existence on the cruches of 2-nation theory?
Muslims are under threat and persecution in India because we in Pakistan see many people indulging in hate speech, demolishing mosques, calling for social boycott of Muslims , even national government do not condemn these instances . It is a realty . we (Pakistanis) are not perfect when it comes to treatment of minorities ,but our political leadership does not preach hate against non Muslims like BJP doing in against non Hindus (Christians and Muslims ).
@@sikandarkamboh5221 dude leave alone your society, parties or govt, your state itself hates non-muslims by law. So just STFU
@@sikandarkamboh5221
1. Your constitution does not allow non-Muslims to be President, PM, COAS, CJP. Indian constitution not only allows non-Hindus to hold these posts but they HAVE held these posts.
2. Hindu population of Pakistan at time of partition was 24%. It is 2% now. Muslim population of India was 9% in 1947 and is 18% now.
3. There have been bomb blasts in Pakiatan in mozque while pwople were doing namaz. That hasn't happened. In India. So much for Muslims being safe in Pakistan.
4. There have been dozens of non-Hinodus in Indian cricket team including at least 4 non-Hindu captains. There were only 2 in Pakistani team. Both were asked to convert. Yousuf Yohanna converted and continued to be in the team. The Hindu player who refused to convert was pushed out of the team on fake excuse.
5. Thousands of Hindu girls are kidnapped and forcibly converted in Pakistan. The police don't even register an FIR. No one is forcibly converting Muslim girls in India.
Muslims who have talent and work hard have reachex the top be it movie stars, singers, music directors, industrialists, lyricists, classical music singers and players etc. They could not progress to the top if at early stage itself they had faced discrimination.
@@sikandarkamboh5221 oh really islam itself called kill non Muslim in the names of jihad convert people jizya OK so please don't say anything wrong here OK
@@sikandarkamboh5221 Pehle yeh batao ki Hindu or Christian can become your PM or not ? (as per your Constitution)
Ranjit Singh na hota ...oo pakistani jahil ..mharaja Ranjit Singh na hote bolo ...give him some respect ..aj jha rule kr rhe ho ..wo area unhi ka bnaya hai ..
Mr. Bangash should correct his views.
Myth :- Nawab for Junagadh signed accession in favour of Pakistan, how could it be
revoked ?
Fact - Actually, it was not a question of revocation.
Looking to the public pressure, Nawab flew away to Pakistan, emptying the state treasury of
its cash and securities, rather than defending his position.
He knew his position was not tenable. Besides Junagadh was
not a state contiguous with Pakistan, unlike J&K.
Pakistan
had indeed claimed the accession of Junagadh as final and
irrevocable on account of the nature of the instrument
something it does not agree to with respect to J&K, for which
the Instrument of Accession was signed in favour of India !
There are several interesting episodes related to
Junagadh. The Nawab of Junagadh also claimed overlordship
of Babariawad and Mangrol.
They had signed the Instrument
of Accession in favour of India on 18 September 1947 .
The
Nawab of Junagadh sought to have the accession revoked,
but it was held that revocation was unlawful, accession
being a one-way street. Nawab then sent his troops to
Babariawad to assert his claim.
Writes C Dasgupta in his book, ‘War and Diplomacy in
Kashmir 1947-48’:
“At the end of September [1947], the Indian
government decided that a show of force was
unavoidable. Sardar Patel pointed out that by
sending its armed personnel into Babariawad,
Junagadh had committed an act of war against India.The princely state which had acceded to India had a
right to expect that India would protect them against
aggression."
The idea of India had been around for thousands of years before BC, and its people were fully aware of their own Bharatvarsha/Aryawrat.. much later around 550 BC Vishu Puran mentioned it clearly saying ...........उत्तरं यत्समुद्रस्य हिमाद्रेश्चैव दक्षिणम्। वर्षं तद्भारतं नाम भारती यत्र सन्ततिः।। (Meaning - The country that lies north of the ocean,and south of the snowy mountains is called Bhárata, for there dwelt the descendants of Bharata.) Lahori Churan must-read book by Diana L. Eck titled "India: A Sacred Geography" . The notion of Rashtra (it's been around for almost 6000 years in India) is far different from the nation-state concept that originated in Europe, we are bound by our sacred geography, not by bigoted religions but by Dharma. It's too much to understand for Yakub.
*India ne pressure daalke, treachery se, princely states ko India mein annex karwaye . Lekin Khan of Kalat ko pyaar se Jinnah Sahab ne accession karwaya* 😂😂😂
,,😁😁😂
This guest is perfect example of intellectual jihadis. Muslims of Pakistan cannot stop jihad.
Dr Yaqoob lies when he says 25 thousand muslims were massacred. Rathar hindus were massacred by Rajakars who were patronized by Nizam of Hyderabad.
Yaqoob bhai is true egg of Jinnah:s philosophy
Egg 😂😂😂 loved it
In mahoday ko Pakistan ke fail hone ka nahin India ke growth karne ka takleef hai
Yaqoob bangash is not the writer...He should not attempt to write any history book. He would be best if he writes pakistani study books.
Arre this guy doesnot know that kashmir was offered to Pakistan by both nehru and sardar. They just wanted that they forget abt junagadh and Hyderabad.
It was fair deal. Jinnah didnot accept deal and accepted accession of junagadh. That was mistake as that erodes trust if any and he was punished for it in all 3 states. And they managed to get part of kashmir and lost everything else
This guy has his own pov. He is defending his pov very solidly. At some places he is throwing just plain bulllshit/ propaganda.
I think he is doctorate from any madrasa. He has not even double standards, he has multiple standards.
Are chutiya aadmi hai kya bol rha hai khud hi kore kuchi nahi pta
36:04
Someone should tell this genius that the freedom struggle (revolutionary or satyagreh) were performed by people of these very Riasat against the colonialism of Britain that time.
It was people who wanted freedom from the oppression of the Maharajas aiding British and the British themselves.
Concepts of getting back under a maharaja/dictatorship would never had existed, “even in your conceptual hind side theory”.
All thanks to sardar Patel who United the republic of India. And yes, if he was that stronger as you point out, there would have been no Pakistan
There’s a word in Urdu that I can resonate your theory is “munafaqat”. Defending all fraudulent views in favor of creation of Pakistan and digression of same for India.
Hypocrisy at its best. Bravo 👏🏼
Madrassa Educated Paxtani Philosopher 😂
If Patel did not have been Intervented all Hindus could have butchered by razakar
Yaqoob bangash looks to be madrsa chaap intellektual enjoying USA freedom
Shocking Oxford university PhD has such standard ?
They're all hypocrites
They're Just Western trained puppet.
Abhi pata chala Pakistan ka history writers history kaise likhte hei😂😂😂😂😂....
After listening to this guy I come to the conclusion “ God bless Pakistan “ but even god can’t save Pakistan
Dr.Bangash maybe Ph.D but looks like if he took a basic course in intellectual honesty, he will definitely get a "F".
Chaudhary remained Chaudhary but Bang changed to Bangash.
Why is the gentleman so obsessed with India?? Let him worry about Pakistan.
He is obsessed wit kafir not India.
Sardar Patel in his speech in Kolkata on 18 Jan 1948 " Kashmir is part of India and we will not let an inch of Kashmir to go with Pakistan if they (pakistan) wants an open and full-fledged war we are ready for this "
Someone should ASK this ---
"Mr. Counter-factual" or "Mr. Hindsight" ... Bangash saheb -
What happens if Jinnah had gone "Upstairs" (he was a Whisky-totz guy!!) 10 years earlier...?? 😂
Freedom movement of India was to librate Hindustan. freedom fighters sacrifice was not aimed to restore Raje - Rajwade . winners were freedom fighters who secured victory of land from british.
British had no right to impose clauses of returning ownership to Gulam royals ,because war for freedom from british was not fought by them .
This shows he just wanted power after partition.
😂😂😂😂
Such a low level of academic standards. The foundation of any serious academic study is honesty. This guy is in a completely different pole. Thanks Mr. Shakil to expose such people.
Mr. Bangash should correct his views.
Myth :- Nawab for Junagadh signed accession in favour of Pakistan, how could it be
revoked ?
Fact - Actually, it was not a question of revocation.
Looking to the public pressure, Nawab flew away to Pakistan, emptying the state treasury of
its cash and securities, rather than defending his position.
He knew his position was not tenable. Besides Junagadh was
not a state contiguous with Pakistan, unlike J&K.
Pakistan
had indeed claimed the accession of Junagadh as final and
irrevocable on account of the nature of the instrument
something it does not agree to with respect to J&K, for which
the Instrument of Accession was signed in favour of India !
There are several interesting episodes related to
Junagadh. The Nawab of Junagadh also claimed overlordship
of Babariawad and Mangrol.
They had signed the Instrument
of Accession in favour of India on 18 September 1947 .
The
Nawab of Junagadh sought to have the accession revoked,
but it was held that revocation was unlawful, accession
being a one-way street. Nawab then sent his troops to
Babariawad to assert his claim.
Writes C Dasgupta in his book, ‘War and Diplomacy in
Kashmir 1947-48’:
“At the end of September [1947], the Indian
government decided that a show of force was
unavoidable. Sardar Patel pointed out that by
sending its armed personnel into Babariawad,
Junagadh had committed an act of war against India.The princely state which had acceded to India had a
right to expect that India would protect them against
aggression."
Yaqoob is disingenous to quote the only secular speech 11th Aug 1947. In all other speeches and actions, Jinnah was communal. Who gave this fool a Doctorate?
Dr Chaudhery. You are great sir. Salute to you.
He said, hydrabadi muslims were killed. If it Was a religious war then why muslims exist today in hydrabad
India crushed Razakars in Operation POLO is a fact, but to understand why we had to do it just imagine radicals in power slaughtering innocent civilians in Telangana, present-day Marathwada just coz they are in power, so by natural laws, Indian forces on the order of Patel decided to give them a taste of their own medicine.
ohh Operation polo just had not occured .
@@sikandarkamboh5221 yes operation polo and razakars also skilled many people
@@sikandarkamboh5221 this goat says 2 nation theory ceased to exist after porkistan was created. Can a Hindu become PM in porkistan?
शकील साहब को शत शत नमन इतना धैर्य साधारण मनुष्य के बस की बात नहीं है।
Basically Jinnah wanted Muslim rulers in all Muslim majority areas. Convenience was his principle. Sardar Patel figured out his BS and broke his legs in Hyderabad and Kashmir
Sir your guest is rationalising irrational actions/behavior.
Prof Ishtiaq Ahmed is an authority on this subject
Dr. Bangash do you know the meaning of diplomacy ?
Sir, the Hyderabad issue can't be equated to a personal home. The ruler was not democratically elected. He had no right to take decision unilaterally...
THIS GUY MUST MUST HAVE NOT HEARD OF MARATHAS OR IS WILLFULLY IGNORING THEM CAUSE UNDER THE MARATHAS INDIA STARTED FROM KERALA IN SOUTH TO KASHMIR TO NORTH,BENGAL FROM EAST TO AFGHANISTAN IN THE WEST.HE IS CLEARLY PARROTING COLONIAL PERCEPTIONS ABOUT INDIA AND HINDUS WITH AN PUNJABI DANGAR ACCENT.
You clearly have not read any genuine history , instead watched a few Ajay Devgan movies which you percieve as actual history.Regards Mandircchaap.
Jinnah played poker hoping muslim ruled princely states like Junagadh, Hyderabad and Bhopal. For Kashmir he thought ruler is not important. He lost 4-0 and most Pakistani feel the pain. They forget that 50 percent plus population of Lahore City and Karachi was non Muslim.
Right!! Jinnah did get PK - but not the kind of PK or IN that he wanted. And by virtue of the fact that after 75 years PK is a failed state and IN is a thriving country - he has proven himself to be a loser in the eyes of history. He was a divider not a uniter. And he has been a net detractor of the Muslim cause as predicted by Mulana Azad.
@@ShyamKumar-zb2mw Jinnah was a lawyer representing Nawabs who were incharge of Muslim League and they wanteed to maintain their land holding status. So he bargained for them and as he became popular he declared himself leader. He had no vision, no policies and no principles.
This guy has not even looked at the recorded correspondence. I would like to see a debate between this person and Dr. Iftaq
cant beleive this guy got Phd from Harvard....is it the same Harvard or some evening college in karachi🤣
Sakil bhai kya aaj aapne abdul bashit ka vedio dekha kya. ??
Kisne bola iss burbok Dr. ko India past me nehi tha. India hajaro Saal se hai or rahega. Iss burbok Dr.ko asli history parana chahiye as every Pakistani read the fake history.
Banda Alag level ka Nasha karta hei.. Pakistan did everything right India Did everything wrong😂😂😂😂😂😂
i see lot of pakistani on this channel but the way he contradicted itself its a unbelievable .
No contradiction he expressed himself very clealry/effectively and punctured Mr Shakils pre-conceived notions about what transpired during partition of (British India's) Punjab/Bengal.Regards Mandircchaap.
@@gangadeshmatakimaut4739 chl be madraschap
This guy doesn't even have basic etiquettes. He is saying ' Ranjit Singh na hota '. Iss ko itni bhi tameez nahi ki 'maharaja Ranjitsingh ' kahen, wo bhi jab ki Aaj pak khud maharaja ki zameen par khada hai.
He's talking as if Nizam's Hyderabad was a model government. His rezakars committed untold atrocities on Hindus who were treated as dhimmis. This guy is justifying everything on the grounds that nobody could have foreseen the outcome.
6:40@ Bangladesh could become part of Pakistan though there is no direct link and India between them but Khan of Kalat can not join India
Too late to argue now. Mr Nehru messed up so many things.
Not only did they (Nehru, Abul Kalam Azad etc) refuse Kalat's proposal to accession to India, they told the paks, putting the kalat leaders' lives in danger.
Not sure if the paks neutralised them with that info from our side. We ie nahru etc betrayed kalat leaders' after refusing their accession.
That's mentality of Paks learned & result is happening in Pakistan today. Regards.
If Jinnah was such an intelligent and pragmatic person then why he could not foresee his painful death on the hot and polluted roads of Karachi and was brought almost dead to hospital for formalties.
What Jinnah was for Pakistan then Imran Khan Niazi Charsi is now for Pakistan 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Please, this is a PhD of Pakistan,i pity u Pak education
This mindset that Bharat is the product of Britishers conscious effort to stitch the country together or Bharat is the benign & traumatic product of British Colonialism is totally wrong. Although there were 584 princely states but commonality of civilizational entity & Sub-conscious political identity was always there & 91% of the population were believers of (Jambu Dweepe, Bharat khande, Aaryavarthe & Bhaarat Varshe - Which comes from vedas). It is the idea which matters.
Nonsense, no common civilization ,body of thought, or culture encompassing WHOLE of SA exists, the Vedas themselves are deeply at odds with each other, bottomline so-called idea of India is almost entirely an British colonial construct (though to be fair the Moghuls did play their role).
@@gangadeshmatakimaut4739 kisko bola re.. go & get your senses checked. Yeha bhang ghosra nahi karne ka
Mr. Bangash should correct his views.
Myth :- Nawab for Junagadh signed accession in favour of Pakistan, how could it be
revoked ?
Fact - Actually, it was not a question of revocation.
Looking to the public pressure, Nawab flew away to Pakistan, emptying the state treasury of
its cash and securities, rather than defending his position.
He knew his position was not tenable. Besides Junagadh was
not a state contiguous with Pakistan, unlike J&K.
Pakistan
had indeed claimed the accession of Junagadh as final and
irrevocable on account of the nature of the instrument
something it does not agree to with respect to J&K, for which
the Instrument of Accession was signed in favour of India !
There are several interesting episodes related to
Junagadh. The Nawab of Junagadh also claimed overlordship
of Babariawad and Mangrol.
They had signed the Instrument
of Accession in favour of India on 18 September 1947 .
The
Nawab of Junagadh sought to have the accession revoked,
but it was held that revocation was unlawful, accession
being a one-way street. Nawab then sent his troops to
Babariawad to assert his claim.
Writes C Dasgupta in his book, ‘War and Diplomacy in
Kashmir 1947-48’:
“At the end of September [1947], the Indian
government decided that a show of force was
unavoidable. Sardar Patel pointed out that by
sending its armed personnel into Babariawad,
Junagadh had committed an act of war against India.The princely state which had acceded to India had a
right to expect that India would protect them against
aggression."
@@gangadeshmatakimaut4739 Teri ammi ki gaand mein meri lulli. jaa bey jaa gaandu.
@@gangadeshmatakimaut4739chutiya waali baatein na kahi or karo jaake
TURKON ne Arabic language me Yaqoob Bangash ki DADIJAAN ko raat ki andhere me lantern laga ke QURAN AND HADITHS ki kafir se pyar karne wali enlightened verse padhaya aur Yaqoob ki DADIJAAN muhhamad ko FIL de baitha. 😂
Nazism - Racial purity of World
Islamism - Religious purity of World ..
According to Quran , Surah Al Baqra 221....
And do not marry polytheistic women until they believe. And a believing slave woman is better than a polytheist, even though she might please you. And do not marry polytheistic men [to your women] until they believe. And a believing slave is better than a polytheist, even though he might please you. Those invite [you] to the Fire, but Allāh invites to Paradise and to forgiveness, by His permission. And He makes clear His verses [i.e., ordinances] to the people that perhaps they may remember.
- Saheeh International
My points :-
(1) The most hated word in the human history of this civilization comes from Qur'an name "Mushriqeens".
So call any muslim mushriq then check his reaction.
(2) There is no freedom of speech or limited FOS , freedom of thought , freedom of artistic expression , freedom of the press , equality of peoples a non-Muslim, a Kafir, is never
equal to a Muslim , no equal protection under Sharia for different classes of
people. Justice is dualistic, with one set of laws for Muslim males
and different laws for women and non-Muslims in almost all muslim nation.
Even Cairo declaration openly opposed United Nations human declaration.
This guest says that if sardar patel would have died earlier, it's boundaries would have been different. I say if jinnah would have died earlier due to his TB, there would have been no Pakistan 🙄. As it is, Paxtan is a non concept!
Here‘s a guy who doesn’t put up the pappy-jhappy I wanna be friends with India show!
Good for him.
At least he doesn’t lie.
Most of the wanna be friends with India guys are actually need to be friends of India folks.
Bhagwan na kare par agar kal ko agar P‘stan phir se khada hota hai, toh yeh sab phir ghazwa-e-hind shuru kar denge.
Well-done jaldi hi Balochistan,sindhudesh ,gilgit etc. Jaldi hi independent ho 🎉
Dr. Bangash's particular angle of view & interpretation enables him to work & prosper within Pakistani academia. However, as made amply clear by the usual incisive questioning of Mr. Chaudhary, it does appear that, more often than not, the Bangash-argument is more focused on clever wording, having a definite undercurrent of a strong bias towards one party, and therefore not entirely presenting an objective big picture of affairs.
Exactly Sir.
Exactly khud hi contradictory statements de rha hai 😅❤
Jinna also said I can sacrifice 2 crores of muslims for sake of Pakistan.
Now Dr. Bangash will forget about Pakistan's confession in UN.
😂
See, he forgot to mention that was pakistani forces in tribals costumes.
Indians watching this channel (it is usually Indians who seem to be thirsty for knowledge) ; please answer this question :
Compare how you felt as an Indian voter before 2014 and how you feel as an Indian voter in 2024. Who has given you the most returns for your vote?
Oxford mein kaise kaise log to admission mil jata hai 🤔. Sifarish quota se hain kya aap?
LOL, shows how much you were hurt by erudite Prof Bangash.
Doctrine of documents is the beauty of Pakistan.
😂😂
A large portion of Bangash sahab clarification is based on that theories, which were not existing at that time. Overall a very good treatment of tuberculosis in the year 1947,in India. Thanks.
Jinnah was already informed by Moulana Azad the future of Pakistan but considered himself “ AQAL E KUL “.
Further on my last update it appears to me that Mr. Bangash regrets of non balkalization of India.
He says that there are many small inedepent states in Europe and so India could have many small independent states. But for Pakistan he justifies forced occupation of Balochistan. Also, he says that had Pakistan sent tank than it had got Ksahmir. Again he is defying his own logic of existence of independent states.
This historian is full of contradictions. I also find that apart from contradictions, his logics are very weak.
Misinformation about kalat 😂pakda geya