@@user-ny1wo1vp9r Funny, but in my native language (Russian that is) this kind of word order is okay, though not as frequent in casual speech (but common in literary language).
4:55 It's incorrect to say that adamların is unambiguous. Yes, the affix -ın denotes genitive case (at least if the previous syllable contains a front vowel), but the word can also be read as containing the possessive affix -n with "ı" serving as a "Fugenvokal." The word then means "your men." I think that, due to his nationality, Handke is a bit partial to German.
The OSV order in English (at 12:58) can be explained if you consider the woman to be in a topic position, a TopP according to Rizzi (1997, 2017). But I cant say why the one with the noun is ungrammatical.
English is the most hybrid language as you placed on the pictre, it is the most over-all-around language ? I think Yes, and thats why is the most dominant language over professional conversations and IT data development.
Vania Led yes it is, but still technically SVO. "The woman the man saw" is worded in such a way to make you think it is the object, but it is actually functioning as a subject (a complete subject).
When the object come before the subject is possible construct sentences using the passive particle by to indicate the subject... the woman seen by the man...
Mandarin actually has many word orders that can be used to bring out a similar meaning 我吃飯 ('I eat rice'; SVO) 我把飯給吃了 ('I ate the rice'; SOV) 雞被我給吃掉了 ('I ate the chicken'; OSV)
I only said adam (TUR) means man. I did not say that adam (TUR) means human. And then I used (DEU) Menschen as an example of fusion.
"Many intelligent students go to Marburg"
I think I can guess where the lecture is held?
Excelent class, thank you very much. I'm currently studying Linguistics here in Brazil and it helped me a lot.
Yoda speaks in OSV
Yoda uses ergative English. Full of the force you are.
Fabulous class. Thank you very much.
You're a good lecturer. I understand topics I learn here even before class
At weddings, part of the traditional vows are "With this ring, I thee wed ". SOV . This is rather archaic, though .
Great example, we'll use it in class (and let our students find it out themselves)!
We can also say things like 'this book I read now'
@@user-ny1wo1vp9r Funny, but in my native language (Russian that is) this kind of word order is okay, though not as frequent in casual speech (but common in literary language).
Thank you very much for presenting information so clearly. It is very easy to understand and remember. Happy to subscribe 😊
This cleared this up for me!!! Great lecture!
4:55 It's incorrect to say that adamların is unambiguous. Yes, the affix -ın denotes genitive case (at least if the previous syllable contains a front vowel), but the word can also be read as containing the possessive affix -n with "ı" serving as a "Fugenvokal." The word then means "your men." I think that, due to his nationality, Handke is a bit partial to German.
Adamların can mean both your men, man's folk's(This is commonly used for proper nouns, similar to Simpsons.) or men's.
The OSV order in English (at 12:58) can be explained if you consider the woman to be in a topic position, a TopP according to Rizzi (1997, 2017). But I cant say why the one with the noun is ungrammatical.
Really enjoyed the lecture. Thanks! (thinking about subscribing to Global Access in the next few months)
Great video!! Thank you sir if you’re still around
English is the most hybrid language as you placed on the pictre, it is the most over-all-around language ? I think Yes, and thats why is the most dominant language over professional conversations and IT data development.
does that means that English language tend to lean more to synthetic fusinal?
...great class...do you have any class about isolated languages like basque?
thank you so much for providing this education
Great! Thanks! Is "the woman the man saw, was wearing a dark coat..." a grammatical sentence?
Vania Led yes it is, but still technically SVO. "The woman the man saw" is worded in such a way to make you think it is the object, but it is actually functioning as a subject (a complete subject).
Great great content. Subscribed
Thank you very much for your lectures. I learned a lot from you.
Excellent class! Thanks a lot for posting it.
is Spanish a fusional language at the same level as latin ?
When the object come before the subject is possible construct sentences using the passive particle by to indicate the subject... the woman seen by the man...
Pozdrawiam Panią Snarską
Następna generacja studentów też pozdrawia
@@lightyknighty418 z nią to były zajęcia...
Great class!
Very interesting!
Sir, do you have a pdf copy of this presentation? hehe
or the pdf by Jurgen Handke?
@@paris-iq4pp All videos that are used in our linguistics courses on oer-vlc.de have PDFs for the videos that are used.
@ th-cam.com/video/sOEaAD2x9ac/w-d-xo.html isn't the "woman was seen by the man" OVS form?
+Karmanya GB Just replace the NPs by pronouns: She was seen by him. she = PRN.SG.F.NOM; him = PRN.SG.M.OBJ
I outs into the street again an' to myself sez I
(R. Kipling)
Looks like OVS, doesn't it?
Mandarin actually has many word orders that can be used to bring out a similar meaning
我吃飯 ('I eat rice'; SVO)
我把飯給吃了 ('I ate the rice'; SOV)
雞被我給吃掉了 ('I ate the chicken'; OSV)
The first wrong is:
Menschen(D) in(TR)Insanlar;
thats Plural in (D andTR)!
Adamlar(TR) is (D)Männer!
16:00 The only Austroasiatic that has tones are Vietnamese branches. And they have tones due to the influence of Sino-Tibetan and Tai-kadai.
nice lesson
16:25 Counting in Chinese: 4 and 10 is very similar and hence would be very confusing.
"the woman is the object" while in this background its simply true i already see some feminist becoming outraged by this statement ^^
+Rohan Zener He doesn't realize what he said is wrong
and then you have Japanese which often use Verb only without S and O.
Ayo TRUNI gang
I adore German and I can't agree with you that this language is ambiguous. Sorry.
He's not saying that the LANGUAGE is ambiguous but that the meaning of an isolated morpheme may be.