Objective history, subjective truth, anxious afterlives, and confusing genders

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 30

  • @udhayveersingh1855
    @udhayveersingh1855 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Deeps and neo charvaka are legendary, i wonder who would win in a debate.

    • @gamesong6600
      @gamesong6600 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You will win, cause you are getting entertainment 😂

  • @Question-Research-wj5wr
    @Question-Research-wj5wr ปีที่แล้ว +17

    VIMOH brother I have a request that you write books on Rational thinking and Scientific temper...... want it to be written by Vimoh👍🏻

    • @vimohlive
      @vimohlive  ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Will try. Thanks

    • @ytubeguruji863
      @ytubeguruji863 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bro, there are so many books written on the concept. While all that it takes is, starts questioning.

    • @simple_guy333
      @simple_guy333 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Vimoh can write a book on rational thinking and taking examples from 1000's of conversation from the streams. It wud be amazing to read such book written by Vimoh.

  • @jaswindersinghnarula4379
    @jaswindersinghnarula4379 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really liked the diverse subjects discussed today. I mean in this live session.

  • @akshayde
    @akshayde ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Vimoh, i want a full episode of you and Deep. And i want you to ask him question, not about religion but about him. I really want to understand this kid and where he comes from and what's going on in his life. He is an enigma and there is something going on deeper and I always feel he will spontaneously combust. How has to come to this understanding of his thoughts.. Oh there is so much I want to ask him 😂

  • @prasenjittripura4691
    @prasenjittripura4691 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Deep , he is actually confused person

    • @warrior_of_liberation
      @warrior_of_liberation ปีที่แล้ว +11

      More like too Indoctrinated by his religion that he is uncomfortable to leave and he is just trying to rationalise it one way or another. Unfortunate for him that Rationality and Religion doesn't go hand in hand. Hopefully he finds way to better literature and ideas...and come out of this useless quest.

  • @vaccharjernau3559
    @vaccharjernau3559 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    NeoCarvaka's argument in a nutshell - conflates gender dysphoria with religious metaphysics, talks about an opinion piece (not a scientific paper) mostly about the binary nature of sex (not gender) and then finally confesses they don't understand the difference between gender and sex
    (BTW - Wright's piece has a few flaws; any biologist or doctor with expertise in this field can elaborate; also, he works for the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank, so he's not without bias)

  • @udhayveersingh1855
    @udhayveersingh1855 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Konsa Korea North?

  • @Lemon-lp1qb
    @Lemon-lp1qb ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hi vimoh, Love the clarity with which you speak. I recently came across a podcast by Richard Dawkins on transgender. And 1st 3-4 minutes in he says sex is binary. I know this isn't true. i have seen "sex and sensability" video by forrest valkai. Dawkins also had a guest who wrote book "trans". And makes the case that children are being confused about gender. I don't understand arguments he is making is correct or not. Can you please talk about it or reply to this comment?

    • @vimohlive
      @vimohlive  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I also think Dawkins is off his rocker. That's all. Watch the reaction to that video on Rationality Rules

    • @Lemon-lp1qb
      @Lemon-lp1qb ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vimohlive thanks. Will do.

    • @LoveYourself-my9nz
      @LoveYourself-my9nz ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Most of the time third gender is about people who are intersex. My main question is this that saying I'm non binary because i don't fit in this definition of man or women which society has created isn't is like catering to the sexism?? We need to remember that society has been very sexist where they have this strict rules how men amd women should behave/act and if they didn't fit into that category they are called third gender as an insult! For example calling a woman a man or third gender just because she has bold personality and likes to have short hair. There's nothing wrong with how you express yourself but if you think that oh I'm not like how a men or women is supposed to behave that's why I'm non binary isn't it is " Hating sexism but at the same time being the victim of internalized sexism and catering to it"!??

    • @ryuchic462
      @ryuchic462 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LoveYourself-my9nz I do not really understand the mechanism of non-binary. But I have similar thoughts as you in this regard.

  • @Nikhil-rr4vd
    @Nikhil-rr4vd ปีที่แล้ว

    Intro music name???

  • @shushunk00
    @shushunk00 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1:33:25 Millions of comrades already use a superior way to analyse the world for decades- history,politics, economy that's called "dialectical materialism" (a sub-sect of is historical materialism which is to analyse history)😂

    • @amarnathswami1135
      @amarnathswami1135 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is problematic in analysing history with Marx perspective ? It is just like any other person

  • @XieLiansHongEr
    @XieLiansHongEr ปีที่แล้ว

    Who is this Deep everyone keeps talking about?

  • @letitbe227
    @letitbe227 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy again

  • @ofAwxen
    @ofAwxen ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Factual error: panini did not create sanskrit grammar rules as Krishna said, he simply documented and codified rules that predated him from a long line of prior grammarians.
    So to conclude that Ramayan was written after Panini is a false conclusion.

  • @kongspeaks4778
    @kongspeaks4778 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Liberals and leftists are not the same thing

    • @romibengali
      @romibengali ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree. Liberalism is a belief on the other hand the Left is one side of the political spectrum.