Replacing the Priest | 105 mm Howitzer Motor Carriage M37

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 82

  • @dannyzero692
    @dannyzero692 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    I love how this thing just look like a corner of a castle.

  • @michaelgautreaux3168
    @michaelgautreaux3168 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Amazing!
    The M106 proved the rejection of the mortar carrier variant to be a big mistake didn't it.
    Amazing.

  • @TheNinjaGumball
    @TheNinjaGumball หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    There's a surviving example at the Russell Military Museum in Illinois. It's surprisingly big in-person

  • @keiranallcott1515
    @keiranallcott1515 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    I’m pretty sure that some were used to depict German tanks in the movie “ the Battle of Britain “

    • @IntrospectorGeneral
      @IntrospectorGeneral หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Yes, in the scene where the Germans are entering Dunkirk. The M37 has been fitted with a longer gun with German-style muzzle brake and 'kill rings'. A canvas dust cover is fitted over the gun mantlet which looks like a prop although British tanks of the period sometimes used canvas covers.

    • @sailordude2094
      @sailordude2094 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And The Rat Patrol TV show, Spanish post war hardware.

    • @oldesalt10310
      @oldesalt10310 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And the battle of the bulge 1965

  • @sailordude2094
    @sailordude2094 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    These were the German "tanks" in The Rat Patrol TV show (or maybe M7s)! Spanish post WWII hardware where it was filmed. Thanks for the video, great history!

  • @jangschoen1019
    @jangschoen1019 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    In hindsight, outfitting an open-top vehicle with a recoilless rifle in a corner isn't the brightest of ideas.

  • @chris_hisss
    @chris_hisss หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Great work! Seems like it would have been a very handy unit to have. I pulled up my model in WOT and had a good look. Nice learning about this! Thanks!
    I'm not sure about deployment or if more or less were needed. I have a hard time understanding how these were used really. I like the idea though. Weird they went to towed arty though in Korea. I wonder if it was due to being able to be quicker or more plentiful? Doesn't seem like it would be but, again just not sure. I do know they were hard up for arty and were even using their Patton tanks as them drove up on small hills.

  • @Panzermeister36
    @Panzermeister36 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another great video. Excellent narration and background footage as well.

  • @rvail136
    @rvail136 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Your pronunciation of "subsequently " is hysterically funny.

    • @MrDino1953
      @MrDino1953 หลายเดือนก่อน

      At least it pronounces “missile” correctly.

    • @bostonrailfan2427
      @bostonrailfan2427 หลายเดือนก่อน

      AI narration for you

    • @rubberwoody
      @rubberwoody 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It's not AI. Tank Encyclopedia hires and pays real people. ​@@bostonrailfan2427

    • @rubberwoody
      @rubberwoody 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      SubSEEquently is a regional American pronunciation.

  • @MrDino1953
    @MrDino1953 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Who will rid me of this troublesome Priest?

  • @PBLKGaming
    @PBLKGaming 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Stop calling me an AI voice I'm just Midwestern :( - Wood

  • @Legitpenguins99
    @Legitpenguins99 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I can imagine the "ah shit" that was probably cut out before or after the Spanish pronunciations lol.

  • @bwilliams463
    @bwilliams463 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The chimney for the MG mount looks kind of like an afterthought.
    8:23 I've seen those metal Locust-style tracks on Chaffees, before. Does anybody know why the tank was equipped with two completely different track designs?

  • @redr1150r
    @redr1150r หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The ones in the Spanish Army were featured in the movie "Patton".

  • @sabeda1647
    @sabeda1647 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like this narrator

  • @ropersf
    @ropersf หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    It's pronounced suhb suh kwuhnt lee not SUB seequently. Just trying to help... I like this channel.

    • @rubberwoody
      @rubberwoody 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The latter is a regional pronunciation. Not necessarily incorrect.

  • @alankjosness2093
    @alankjosness2093 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My father's copy of the official diary, "THE STORY OF THE 62ND", follows the history of the 62nd Armored Field Artillary Battalion and their M7 weapons. (As a kid, I was told NOT to use the British "Priest" name). The book goes from Fort Bliss in early 1941 to North Africa in late 1942. From there they participated in the D-Day assault on Sicily, July 10th 1943. Next came England then onto Omaha Beach, June 6th, 1944. In the fall of '44, Dad's malaria took him out of action. Pretty well took him out of the war. His weapon, though, the M7 mobile 105mm howitzer was used by the 62nd 'til the end of the war.

  • @Joe.D.780
    @Joe.D.780 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    white phosphorus isn't "mustard gas" it's the same chemical used to produce smoke in most smoke shells even today. tho they have been abused as chemical weapons. however 105mm shells produced with chlorine gas "mustard gas" payloads were produced at the time " just in case" tho they were never reported to be fired in anger and all stocks were destroyed at some point.

  • @drmarkintexas-400
    @drmarkintexas-400 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    🎖️⭐🏆🙏❤️‍🩹
    Thank you for sharing this

  • @AndrewC.McPherson-xf5zw
    @AndrewC.McPherson-xf5zw หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good show

  • @AsbestosMuffins
    @AsbestosMuffins หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the giant pulpit seemed like a bit of a flaw

  • @mr.factoid105
    @mr.factoid105 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am surprised they didn't mount the recoilless more centrally

  • @michaelhband
    @michaelhband หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    👍👍👍

  • @stuew6
    @stuew6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Battle of Bulg use this Tank and M24 Caffee

    • @Colonel_Obvious
      @Colonel_Obvious หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video was not about a tank. The subject of the video was the M37 Howitzer Motor Carriage- not a tank.

  • @retteip8276
    @retteip8276 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you do about the M108, the little brother of the M109

  • @willcullen3743
    @willcullen3743 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why is an amercan tank listed in kph instead of mph??

  • @Basicallybaltic
    @Basicallybaltic หลายเดือนก่อน

    8:00 Can someone tell me what these vehicles are?

    • @TanksEncyclopediaYT
      @TanksEncyclopediaYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Other self-propelled guns of the period: the M41, M40, M12, and T92.

  • @SteveTheFazeman
    @SteveTheFazeman หลายเดือนก่อน

    I never heard of this motor carriage. Looks strange and uncomfortable to ride in.

  • @conradnelson5283
    @conradnelson5283 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting. Why is all that crap flying around?

    • @TanksEncyclopediaYT
      @TanksEncyclopediaYT  หลายเดือนก่อน

      The in-game map this was filmed on has a Tornado in one corner, so it's sucking up leaves, paper and other junk.

  • @kawaiiarchive357
    @kawaiiarchive357 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How do you mess up designing a travel lock?

    • @MrSpirit99
      @MrSpirit99 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Floppy?

    • @kawaiiarchive357
      @kawaiiarchive357 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @MrSpirit99 I get that but how does one manage to mess up such a simple job?

  • @jimroberts3009
    @jimroberts3009 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Sub-siquently? No it's Subsi-quently. AI voice?

    • @sidgar1
      @sidgar1 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      It's pronounced like that in the UK, Canada, and Australia/NZ. They also pronounce "process" as "pro cess" (not "prah- cess like Americans). Pro-cess and sub-seequentky come from the original UK English and are widely in use.

    • @jimroberts3009
      @jimroberts3009 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@sidgar1 Sorry but I'm British and have NEVER pronounced it like in the video nor has anyone I know! Thanks Mr Pedantic.

    • @sidgar1
      @sidgar1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jimroberts3009 Just because you don't pronounce it like that doesn't mean many others don't. It's a valid pronunciation. And stop liking your own comments, that's just cringe.

    • @sidgar1
      @sidgar1 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@jimroberts3009 Just because you've never heard it before doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Maybe expand your horizons a bit?

    • @jimroberts3009
      @jimroberts3009 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@sidgar1 Learn how us British speak before you try to correct one!! Expand your horizons dude.

  • @thomasheer825
    @thomasheer825 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would think that this would be employed much more than it really was. With towed systems you have limited their employment, as they have to be disconnected, made ready, employed and then again broke down to travel. But when if ever has the Army higher commands had a Look Forward thought process? Just how long have they clung to the M-16 family of long guns, and only now replacing them with something with more knockdown and accuracy at ranges.

    • @bostonrailfan2427
      @bostonrailfan2427 หลายเดือนก่อน

      never served in the military, did you? all of the crap you spewed is pure bull droppings

  • @robertsolomielke5134
    @robertsolomielke5134 หลายเดือนก่อน

    TY- latter day 'wespe" of forgettable use.

  • @tsclly2377
    @tsclly2377 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thee machingun mount was a hindrance and the gun too short in calibers they never took a good look at the STuH and the crew excessively large.. stupid is as stupid does

    • @TanksEncyclopediaYT
      @TanksEncyclopediaYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The StuH was an assault gun, this was self-propelled artillery, which are wildly different roles.

    • @tsclly2377
      @tsclly2377 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TanksEncyclopediaYT I beg to differ as to the actual role.. Do not be clouded by US American military doctrine, but more so look at the shells that they demanded be carried. SHuH came in two barrel lengths, abet elevation and traverse was lacking, but it was way more proficient in its role and success. Adding some elevation would have put it's ability to chuck sub-munitions an incredible distance, something close to what was achieved by Flak-39 electrics in the South of France invasion (First hand account).

  • @JTA1961
    @JTA1961 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Meters ? I thought WE won the war...WTF...

    • @thhseeking
      @thhseeking หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Metres. Only three countries don't use the metric system. Get with the program! :P

    • @michaelbizon444
      @michaelbizon444 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@thhseeking Every loser country that lost a World WAR, Moon Race, and the Cold War was on metric. No Thanks.

    • @bostonrailfan2427
      @bostonrailfan2427 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thhseekingno.

    • @bostonrailfan2427
      @bostonrailfan2427 หลายเดือนก่อน

      written by Europeans, narrator is AI

    • @thhseeking
      @thhseeking หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bostonrailfan2427 Yes. 5% of the world's population trying to lord it over the other 95%. Leave us alone!

  • @luvr381
    @luvr381 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    White phosphorus is not mustard gas.

    • @TanksEncyclopediaYT
      @TanksEncyclopediaYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Not what we said.
      The M60 shell could be loaded with white phosphorus or mustard gas.

    • @niallcunningham642
      @niallcunningham642 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      The M60 designation was used for both a WP Smoke shell and a Mustard Gas Shell :- Cartridge 105mm: Smoke, WP M60 Series and Cartridge 105mm: Agent H or HD, M60
      Why the same designation for two different shells who knows - It probably made sense to someone at some time.
      Technical manual TM 43-0001-28 - sections 3-15 and 3-19 if you want the details.

    • @wacojones8062
      @wacojones8062 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@niallcunningham642 same bursting charge and fuzing, both had to be sealed with special requirements for storage.