Listen To This Powerful Answer!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ส.ค. 2024
- Please watch part 2: "Jesus is GOD in the Quran | Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel "
• How The QURAN Describe... -~-
Nabeel Qureshi enjoyed defeating Christians and proving that the Bible is corrupted. Learn from Nabile how to defend the bible's many translations.
The Gospels Historically Reliable? • PERFECT Response To Su...
Taken From: • Seeking Allah, Finding...
#NabeelQureshi #SeekingAllahFindingJesus #NoGodButOne
#islam #bible
![อยู่คนเดียวกับเขา - ส้ม มารี (Zom Marie) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gq1cWAIQDLg/mqdefault.jpg)
![ว้าว!ลุงบีมแบกทองมารับขวัญหลานกันยกบ้าน [cc] แดนแพทตี้ SS2 | EP.49 |](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Osihq1OAs-4/mqdefault.jpg)
The Gospels Historically Reliable? th-cam.com/video/U3o5Q3ut0uQ/w-d-xo.html
Call jesus blood
Different translations NOT DIFFERENT VERSIONS. The message remains the same. Jesus Christ of Nazareth is King🙌🙌
Well... the message does change because depending on your theology you will translate the text differently to convey a different message.
@@ljss6805the message never changes.
God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten son that whosoever shall believe in Him shall not perish but have everlasting life. Repent of your sins and Follow Jesus Christ. No one can get to the Father except through the son. So no, the good news never changes. If you are following another doctrine, you are not following The Truth.
@@ljss6805can you find us some significant changes
@@SoildergirlAMEN!
The Holy Spirit within You will show you what is relevant for you. The Father Knows what you need before you even ask. Trust Him!😊❤
💯Amen
Amen.
This "father" you mention may well know what I need before I even ask. But that doesn't mean he (and it must be a male!) will act on that knowledge. He sits up there, sees our needs.....and chuckles, "She needs more money to be able to provide for her children. He needs heart surgery. She needs a replumbing job to solve her urinary tract infection. He needs an arterial roto-rooter to clear out the plaque. OK, yep, I know what they need, now back to my crossword, it's really tough this week."
Nabil is dead but not Gone. He is home with The Father, The Son and all our brothers and sisters that have gone before. Renewed and reinvigorated in the presence of the I AM. Glory to God in the highest
@@stevepierce6467
Sorry..about your Father.
Had this question asked to me by a Jew regarding the New Testament, and I didn't have an answer. I dug deep into how the Bible was translated but I felt it was too hard to explain all that to an unbeliever. This answer really helps, especially because I know multiple languages as well, thank you!
Im sorry but im done rationalizing stuff. Im turning to a blind faith because im done with the search.
God has proven me time and time again during my trial that he wont leave me.
Ill leave it up to the Father and trust he knows what he is doing.
What i mean is, a hardened heart isnt set to understand it no matter how hard you try to explain.
Theyre only there to separate you
This answer is completely wrong! The Bible specifically warns us about listening to men... Man's heart is deceptively wicked who can know it scripture says... Jesus warned us there will be many false people that will come in his name saying this and that... All this guy is doing is promoting doubt in the scriptures. The King James Bible was translated from the original Hebrew and the original Greek. All you need is an inner linear Bible and then you can see the translation for yourself in compare it to your King James Bible. The other Bibles have been corrupted because the church has been divided against itself which Jesus says a kingdom divided against itself cannot stand... This is why the churches are corrupt and lukewarm. Because everybody's decided that it's a good idea to listen to man instead of going to Jesus for your wisdom and your knowledge. This man is a liar and his answer is false his argument was false everything about this horrible video is false. The King James Bible is trustworthy and lines up verbatim with minor exceptions that do not change the message with the Greek in Hebrew. All the other ones even the new King James have been changed and altered to fit the church's new opinions that have been changed over the last hundred years or so so that they can have their different denominations. Stop listening to man... Man will lead you to hell
Its good to read that God has proven Himself to you. I hope you will be able to testify about that to many people. I think rational arguments are just as important though, just not for all people. Both are necessary in this world. You are right to speak of what God has done in your life, that may be very fruitful. Others are really (partly perhaps) won over by rational arguments.
It’s not an argument that a nonbeliever could leave alone. Way too weak of an argument for that.
Testify? You cannot show proof of that. Faith is for trust in God not trust in matters that require evidence. The translation issue is a minor issue compared to the authorship issue.
Praise God for Nabeel. His ministry is still reaching and teaching people.
Unfortunately he is teaching people the wrong thing by trying to make them blind to evidence.
Here, Nabeel is talking about a conversation he had with a friend before he became a believer. He was talking about how he was once very skeptical because he didn’t understand how the Bible was translated. The conclusion his friend reaches points to evidence of Scripture being original and authentic. The truth of it all probably was part of how Nabeel became a believer.
All he did was propose conjecture. I don't know why Christians are so prone to falling for a story rather than looking at the actual issues. The issue of authorship is actually more important but let us look at the translation issue. The example he uses is nonsense to be quite frank. Being able to converse in day to day interactions vs the ability to translate complex literature are not the same things. The level of understanding for the latter has to be of a higher nature. For eg we all speak English but does that qualify us to be English teachers? Are regular speakers of a language on the same level as language scholars who can compile a dictionary or compile the rules of grammar in a systematic way? That is the level of sophistication that is expected when dealing with complex literature. So believing that anyone could have easily and accurately translate the Bible does not match reality.
In a general population there can be people who are multilingual, but that cannot be used to assume a specific person was multilingual. In order to know if a person was multilingual, there must be specific evidence to that effect. The only safe assumption in a matter of this kind is that if a person is capable of speaking, he speaks his native language for certain. Also some people may not be fluent in another language, but can speak enough to get by in day to day interactions - a level which is certainly not suitable for translating complex literature.
And then there is the issue of doctrinal bias in translations. This is linked to the issue of authorship because authorship is not only important for accurately transmitting the text but also for tracing the understanding of the text to the founder of the religion. The Bible was not compiled using any standard that can be considered reliable - how do we know this? It goes back to what a church father who was instrumental in identifying the 4 Gospels said. Irenaeus of Lyon said there can only be 4 Gospels because of the 4 winds and 4 regions of the earth where people live, among other absurd assertions. So there was no objective criteria used to verify the authenticity of the Bible let alone how to understand it. So doctrines such as the divinity of Christ cannot be taken as reliable and the denouncing of early groups such as Ebionites, Nazarenes, etc was done based on bias. A good example for comparison would be to look at the difference between the apostolic creed and the nicene creed.
I love Nabil ❤️
I am sure his soul is now resting in eternal peace and joy ✝️🌹🌷
I've always felt that the GOD I serve and have a relationship with is more than capable of ensuring what HE wants said is in fact whats said.
HE created the entire universe and everything in it, me thinks we can trust the Word.
have l got a bridge for you to buy.
The bible is a man made book with man made wisdom (Kain and Abel) and man made errors :
+ light wasn't there before the sun
+ the earth wasn't there before the sun
+ Adam and Eve didn't exist
+ insects have six legs not four legs
+ the value of Pi isn't 3
+ homosexuality is not a seduction by a satan, but a natural born healthy sexual orientation with an evolutionary sense
+ the "firmament" is not a solid "roof" over the world
+ the moon doesn't produce visible light
+ etc etc
If the bible would be the word of god or inspired by god it would be without errors, but it isn't.
+ homosexuality is not a seduction by a satan, but a natural born healthy sexual orientation with an evolutionary sense. Based on what? Again, this looks like your opinion. There is no concrete scientific evidence whatsoever that anyone is "born gay". The cause of homosexuality is still very much unknown.
@@user-hr8dx9qw4n
+ yes there was, other stars or even your own big bang for example
+ depends if it was formed from an asteroid
+ your making an assumption
+ some can
+ its important because?
+ making an assumption
+ we know
+ it reflects light
+etc etc
If the Bible isn't, it wouldnt of been written down by eyewitnesses or wrote down with their help as there would be none of Christ and Israel wouldnt have been punished in the OT
@johnqdoe8841 That is exactly how I started my belief and remains the core of my belief despite the multitudes of imperical scientific evidence that has been discovered to support it.
It doesn't matter what language the Bible is written, it has authority and truth, unlike man ✝️
It has conflicting accounts and inconsistencies. Even in the resurresction accounts the four evangelists do not corroborate so can't be all true.
Like most Christians you merely assume what you believe without evidence.
@stuartdavidson162
Reading more about the harmony of the Gospels would be an eye opening experience. I should probably do a refresher myself…
@@stuartdavidson162 As long as you spread love and forgiveness my friend.
@@TheTriathlete I do - I'm also keen to stop the spread of misinformation :)
All the best to you :)
I say that God preserves His Word.
KJV
I miss Nabeel, I wish he were still around.
Wait, he’s dead?
@@justice8718 : Yes, he passed away from stomach cancer in 2017. I didn't know it either until I looked him up. Very sad.
He was a better talker than David Wood, his close buddy at odds with TH-cam, who persuaded him to credibly consider the Bible. @@justice8718
@@justice8718he died in 2017
Nabeel was a good speaker. (Friend of David Wood, but a better speaker in my opinion. They were close college buddies. Dave persuaded him to credibly consider the Bible). Dave and YT Censors don't get along. @justice8718
The letter kills, the spirit gives life.
Nabeel Qureshi, part of the Church Triumphant, pray for us
Bible is rooted in absolute terms.
2nd Timothy 3:16 all scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine for reproof for correction for instruction in righteousness
Amen!
not if you take out the word the translators added in that sentence, obviously the author is speaking of the old testament since the new testament didn't exist at that time, so to you circumcision and eating certain meats and so much more, your saying is something God requires, that's just not true, take out the word " is " and read it again, or fix that sentence by adding the word " that " before the word the translators added " is " and you will have the truth, they themselves divided or separated the words inspired by man in the old testament to reveal the words that God did inspire to acknowledge the truth or truths about God, even you yourself will agree that not everything written in the old testament is a requirement for being saved, Jesus Himself disagreed with much in how they translated the old testament, saying, you have heard it was said, thou shalt not commit adultery, but I tell you the TRUTH, put your trust in the old testament like they did, with their understanding of it, which hasn't changed at all by the ones that translated it, you will become as they were which is what Jesus meant by saying, search the scriptures, for in them you think you have life, definitely not ALL scriptures were inspired by God, for if it had been, they would have recognized who Jesus was when He came, the ones that do reveal who Jesus was ( many of them do ) but translated wrong is the same problem they have today in not being able to recognize Jesus for who He is, end of story
Thank you David Wood for your insight of the Bible and thank you Nabeel for doing so much for the Kingdom of God and now enjoying the presence of Our Father in haven. We'll meet soon. Jesus Christ is Lord of all Hallelujah amen
Not a problem at all for GOD!
The idea that Jesus’ primary language was Aramaic, was promoted by the movie “The Passion of the Christ” from 2004. Mel Gibson had the entire manuscript written in Aramaic and people began to buy into this theory. Fact: Jesus and the New Testament were at the time of the Roman Empire which in the promised land still spoke Greek (a left-over from the Greek Empire) Galilee and Judah would have spoken koine Greek not Aramaic which was from the Babylonian Empire and was not in common use except in outlying small communities. The only times that Jesus used Aramaic are preserved in the KJV in their original form such as “Talitha Cumi” in Mark 5:41 or “Ephphatha” in Mark 7:34 Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani in Mark 15:35 is another instance, (Matthew 27:46 has it in Greek “Eli, Eli,”) other Aramaic usage is “ABBA” “maranatha” “raca” and “Hosanna” As a side note, both Daniel and Ezra from the Old Testament use Aramaic due to their being during the Babylonian period.
So much is being said about the contamination of the New Testament to put a question mark over its accuracy, the worst being that Mark was the first gospel to be written. Mark was a youth at the time of Jesus’ ministry, and a young assistant to the Apostle Paul in The Acts. How could he be the source for Matthew and the other Gospel writers. Modern textual critics would have us believe that there are no eye-witnesses to Jesus’ Life and Words i.e. everything is second hand. If indeed “Faith comes through hearing the Word of God”; Satan is going to attack it, to undermine the faith of those who do not recognize it as the Word of God (Literally God’s Words) Be warned!
“God’s Word stands forever “ Isaiah 40:6-8, 1 Peter 1:23 and 25”The Word of the LORD endures forever!”
Shame how 32 people liked your comment containing blatant misinformation, the overwhelming majority of Biblical scholars including Pope Francis himself affirm that he spoke the Galilean dialect of Aramaic, not Greek. Not only is your view ahistoric revisionism but it's funny to see how you somehow believe this idea that he spoke Aramic on a movie from 2004, stop getting your religion off of TH-cam.
@@Kaijiii7exactly and well spoken. This speaker on the video right here is a the prime example of trying to deceive people into leaving the Truth and into apostasy both Catholics and Protestants. Just because something is not worded exactly the way it should have been from language to language does not mean it has been corrupted because different words express the same meaning and things even in English do they not? There’s my case to that heretic of a speaker
The funniest bullshit is christian bullshit
@@Kaijiii7 So modernism and a Pope that is celebrated as the vicar of Christ (although he has been one of two living vicars of Christ); who has also has compromised the sanctity of Life, the moral purity of Man and Woman in the “Type” that displays the Relationship between Christ and His Bride (The Church), is the source for your “proof”. Obviously, modern criticism ignores the “internal Evidence” that proves the Greek Authorship. Why would the language revision of The Old Testament (used in Jesus day,and by Him,) “The Septuagint”, have been in Greek!?! Respectfully, you are ignoring obvious proofs and therefore Fact. Put your confidence in The Infallible, not in human revisionism.
@@Kaijiii7Jesus actually did speak Greek he was multilingual as scholars suggest and understood that there is no way Jesus spoke to Pontus Pilate in Aramaic or Hebrew since he is a historical figure which knew neither just Greek and Latin. Also when Jesus was crucified above his head was 3 languages Aramiac Hebrew and Greek do you even have a clue what demographic was in Jerusalem at that time? Absolutely ludicrous to think that none of them was multilingual especially considering Jesus countless times spoke to people who did not Know Aramaic! Jesus very own disciples were mixes of Greek and Jewish heritage speaking both Hebrew and Greek. Aramaic was a localised language used locally people need to stop acting like Aramaic was such a big language like Arabic or Hebrew it wasn’t. Even in Isreal/Palestine as we speak the local language of Aramaic is spoken in the parts Jesus allegedly came from and they are orthodox Christians it is not widely spoken and never was.
Great speaker left a great void upon untimely death by cancer.
🙏 Nabeel's passing was on God's time, and he went out worshipping and praising God as long as he could. Praise God for what He did in Nabeel's life, and continues to do after his death. God bless you 🙏
So God gave him cancer so that he could die in time? Always when someone dies early they say it.
Or God did not cure him from cancer?
The enemy doesn't have to corrupt or change the Bible if he can get people to incorrectly assume they already understand what it's saying.
Yeah, that's a powerful answer. God bless the one who gave the response, and blessed be God for giving him strength in the face of opposition!
Love that! Christians who KNOW not only the bible but also FACTS around it and why the gospel is nothing but the only truth. God bless David!
Thou shalt do no murther This Law is written on the Hearts of all Man. As well as the rest of the Commandments. NO words are needed Blessings to Family of God. The gentiles as well Lord, have mercy upon me, and incline my heart to keep this law
You are right in that the correct translation of Exodus 20:13 according to biblical scholars is as you say "Thou shalt not (do) murder" and yet Exodus 20:13 KJV states "Thou shalt not kill".
We both know that murdering and killing are not the same thing so in your statement alone there is a mistranslation :D
@@stuartdavidson162 Your conjectures give credence to the biblical scholars as a cornerstone. Implying less authority to the KJV. This conjecture is redundant, as all translations from the beginning are 2nd hand. Subject to error.
Secondly, Murder and Killing are the same thing. I say this in respect to the intent of each Blessings
@@pureblood7775 It isn't conjecture - My conclusion is not formed on the basis of incomplete information.
In relation to your statement "All translations from the beginning are 2nd hand. Subject to error.all translations from the beginning are 2nd hand. Subject to error" goes against the primary subjest of the video which advocates that the message of the New Testament is known "With certainty"
Lastly, your statement "Murder and Killing are the same thing. I say this in respect to the intent of each" is just wrong - Even Dennis Prager agreed with this difference and notes that in war, combatants would kill the enemy but not be murdering them and therefore are not commiting a sin.
We read the Bible with the help of The Holy Spirit and using different versions we get a better understanding of what The Lord said and is still saying.
Jesus is the word and we praise God with all our heart
Thank U Father for Your Word, I just luv It! And U!!
Thanks for listening
Nabil, this world needs plenty Nabils like you in these end times! Eternally gone, yet sound fully preaching and touching lives! We miss you 😢
The Greek language is a very precise language too. Very similar to Hebrew language. So when translated from one to the other I am pretty sure it did lose much if anything. I had some lady say pretty much the same thing to me. That got me started with learning Greek.
Hebrew is Semitic language, greek isn’t
They are similar in that they are both numeric in nature. But no there was no loss, because of the strict rules for copying OT, and NT Biblical manuscripts!
Every single language is filled to the brim with delicious ambiguities and double meanings, since every language is a product of humans. Greek is no different. Even words which seem utterly concrete take on multiple shades of meaning depending on the context: take "boy" for example. Concretely, that boy looks like his father. But how about "good ol' boy" or when a god ol' boy addresses a black male of any age as "boy." Then the completely meaningless "Boy, that was a tough exam!" And what do they mean when they say "boys will be boys"? Languages lose a lot even when being simply transmitted intact from one mouth to an ear. Some words are so fully laden with emotional or cultural baggage that they cease to mean anything at all; how about "family values" or "liberty."?
if you understood linguistics in any way you'd never have made that comment. Cirtiquing language as poor for "communicating precise thought"! Real bright comment mouth breather. @@stevepierce6467 BTW the original comment is correct, ancient Greek is a very precise language.
@@DavidJosephBoth I am guessing you profess as a christian. I often see that christians, when confronted with disagreement, often resort to childish taunts and insults because they lack any substantive response. I do not speak ancient Greek or Hebrew nor do I live in the milieu where those languages were spoken, and neither do you. I base my comments on a common-sense real-life experience speaking 5 languages amongst the peoples who speak them. People have not changed that much in 3-4 thousand years and they frequently use and misuse their native language, sometimes on purpose. Having also been a professional translator and simultaneous court interpreter, I know how tricky languages can be and how legalese has the precise function of attempting to bring precision to an often ambiguous and confusing situation. So, why don't you refer back to your "christian" teachings, one of which said to do (and say) unto others what you would wish to have done unto you. Every language has the potential to be very precise, but also to be annoyingly or at times delightfully ambiguous.
The New Testament was written in Greek and the English versions have been translated one time: From Greek to English. The same is true for the German bible, the French Bible, the Japanese Bible, ... etc.
Punctuation can make a huge difference in understanding. Luke 23:43 is one example that because of the punctiation used leads many to incorrect understanding.
Tanks for bringing truth. God bless you.
NT was written in Greek and not Latin and like someone said let's plead with the holy spirit for the right spirit of understanding and interpretation.
Christ is the Lord ❤
Well his Christian friend didn't back down like he hoped he would. I knew the Bible has been translated from different languages into different languages. But the word of God and Jesus from my understanding hasn't changed.
Praise be to our Lord Jesus Christ. Thank and Praise GOD for Nabeel and his life.
Because people are so corrupted today they thing everything back then was also corrupt. But the truth is that people then were full of believing and there was also a part of fearing good. It is written by Jesus through apostle John in the last sentence of the Bible, what will happen to anyone trying to chance just a point of the i of anything written in this book.
Haha great answer. Open your heart to the lord.
I hope I get to meet this man someday, truly an inspiration
Amen. Praise Jesus Christ, Lord God and Redeemer.
Spoken like a true person, who has never studied linguistics. For instance: The Hebrew “alma” for virgin and the Greek word “ parthenos” do not have the same meaning, yet both are translated as virgin. And if you look at Genesis, the verbs referring to God are in the plural. Yes, “they” was the appropriate pronoun for God if you look at the opening lines in Hebrew.
Spoken like a true moron. And alma is a "young virgin who has come of age puberty wise, has no husband and has no children - virgin" and almana is a "old woman, husband is either living or dead, she is well past puberty and has no children or is barren". One is a "fertile place" one is a "desolate" place.
The word virgin is taken from the "alma" of Isaiah. No Jewish ALMA in Hebrew bible is being referred to who is not a "bethulah" (virgin).
That's a dumb argument. It wouldn't be "a sign" if she wasn't a virgin. So don't try to correct masters who translated the KJV at the height of English golden era.
And they is not an appropriate translation. "ELOHIM" though in hebrew it is a pluralized and also singular sentence in the beginning of the book (if you know hebrew). Later in the text you discover a cocept in the text summarized as being "echad" (oneness) to this Ancient of Days and Malach YVHV as well as Able, Seth, Abraham (the entire nation), Issac (the nation), Jacob (the nation), Judah (mashiach), David (mashiac) etc...) THey speak of them as "echad" with the Mashiach in wording as though they are one.
You'd have to study linguistics and the book you are speaking on.
Interesting. That makes sense because God the Father and Jesus Christ are 2 separate beings.
@@DavidJosephBoth A quick search shows that Parthenos is the Greek term for virgin - agreed - but In Hebrew, Alma (עלמה) means a young woman, particularly unmarried - not virgin.
So it appears that @RickV-tn4qc is correct in his statement. Maybe too quick to call some one a moron?
Yes, because “they” refers to the Holy Trinity: the Father, the Word (which becomes the Son) and the Holy Spirit. This is why it’s important to discuss these things with others. Take it up with an orthodox priest, since they have to study theology and can provide good answers to these types of questions. Depending on language, there’s also bibles with commentary by bishops that shed light on parallels as well as “contradictions”. Not sure if the English are fortunate enough to have such a bible, but I have a good romanian one.
When you STOP at a red Stop Sign at the California Mexican Border, then cross over and it says ALTO, it is not CORRUPTED!
Mexican Stop sign is bad example and the language isn't a tens thousand years old like Jesus time.
Jesus words and bible is book has many chapters.
Tell me one person who could translate it perfectly without having a mistake. Then you translate it after many thousand year then translate it again for years and more.
Even people in this generation had a mistake of translation despite being more advance and you can search the internet for the answers.
Despite all of that, You need to trust God and have faith in him ❤️
What are you talking about? Your numbers are way off. And most recent translations of the Bible are based directly on critical editions of the Greek New Testament. There's not much disruption in terms of the translation.
@@princekievargas220 LOL!! How do you get out of BED with your insecurity?!? Can you walk across the room, PERFECTLY?? Can you even type to me perfectly, no, you left an INDENT and your paragraphs are not perfect. INFORMATION is not perfect, Prince. But GOD is PERFECT and He has very SUCCESSFULLY reached billions with this "imperfectly translated" Bible! His WORD never passes away. Earth shall, translation shall, but NOT the INFO. Stop being so hung-up on this and find ONE mistranslation of IDEA... You cannot.
@@ApatiEktetheimenos One mistranslation idea? Are you sure about that?
Read this you genius 🤡
New Testament verses not included in modern English translations are verses of the New Testament that exist in older English translations (primarily the King James Version), but do not appear or have been relegated to footnotes in later versions. Scholars have generally regarded these verses as later ADDITIONS to the original text.
Although many lists of missing verses specifically name the New International Version as the version that omits them, these same verses are missing from the main text (and mostly relegated to footnotes) in the Revised Version of 1881 (RV), the American Standard Version of 1901, the Revised Standard Version of 1947 (RSV),[1] the Today's English Version (the Good News Bible) of 1966, and several others. Lists of "missing" verses and phrases go back to the Revised Version[2] and to the Revised Standard Version,[3][4] without waiting for the appearance of the NIV (1973). Some of these lists of "missing verses" specifically mention "sixteen verses" - although the lists are not all the same.[5][better source needed]
The citations of manuscript authority use the designations popularized in the catalog of Caspar René Gregory, and used in such resources (which are also used in the remainder of this article) as Souter,[6] Nestle-Aland,[7] and the UBS Greek New Testament[8] (which gives particular attention to "problem" verses such as these).[9] Some Greek editions published well before the 1881 Revised Version made similar omissions.[10]
Editors who exclude these passages say these decisions are motivated solely by evidence as to whether the passage was in the original New Testament or had been added later. The sentiment was articulated (but not originated) by what Rev. Samuel T. Bloomfield wrote in 1832: "Surely, nothing dubious ought to be admitted into 'the sure word' of 'The Book of Life'."[11] The King James Only movement, which believes that only the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible (1611) in English is the true word of God, has sharply criticized these translations for the omitted verses.[5][better source needed]
In most instances another verse, elsewhere in the New Testament and remaining in modern versions, is very similar to the verse that was omitted because of its doubtful provenance.
There is so much evidence that i could find and that not existed in current bible to old bible.
God is perfect ❤️
But the one who translate it is not perfect 🤦 and no HUMAN IS PERFECT REMEMBER THAT.
@@ljss6805 I agree! The Bible is thee-most analyzed topic on earth, and if there were all these translation errors that my buddy Prince thinks they would be well-known and nobody has yet to name one!
God bless your soul my dear bruv!
Amen.
Well, the Bible is a library.
In any public library you'll find
1) Theological books
2) Science textbooks
3) Biography books
4) Autobiography books
5) Poetry books
6) History books and others.
The Bible thus contains
1) Words of God
2) Words of prophets of God
3) History
4) Words of men
5) Etcetera.
A whooole lot of etcetera
Nice sentiment but the bible is not a library - It's a collection of writings from various sources that were brought together around 200CE. With there being multiple sources there are inconsistencies and conflicting accounts.
And please don't reference it as a science textbook - it is far from it. I wouldn't even refer to an actual science texboot that's 100 years old as science has moved on - religion on the other hand... :D
Muhammad made up Allah to satisfy his desires, sexual and otherwise.
I was shocked to see Surah 33: 53 of Allah's response.
Some of Muhammad's guests had stayed late at his house. He wanted them gone.
So, suddenly, Allah speaks through Muhammad to the guests, I am not shy to tell you to leave the house even though Muhammad is shy to tell you to leave his house. (Paraphrased)
On seeing this, I realized, Muhammad had made up Allah to satfisy his desires. It's the only time in any religious book where the character of God is used for someone's housekeeping.
It is amazing Muslims can't see through Muhammad's deception.
Well, the Quran calls "Allah" the "greatest deceiver".... but, get this, calls Satan the "great deceiver" as well...almost like Satan is mocking his followers, who knew he was rude like that?! 😂
muslims are the descendants of ishmael who was unjustly thrown out into the desert along with his mother hagar by abraham, despite hagar devotedly offering her body for procreation. muslims are semite outcasts who despite their condition tried to find god in their own way and they have deep hatred for jews due to abraham's betrayal. yes, their religion is less consistent but they did what they could with the hand they were played, this is why their prophet currently has 1.8 billion sympathizers
The ones that care about the truth are worried about losing their family or even their life for leaving Islam.
@@silaaron76 BINGO! BINGO! APOSTASY LAWS AT THEIR FINEST (SURAH 9:5).
Throwing shade on other religions when the "Good book" has Leviticus and Deutoronomy full of doozies such as not eating shellfish, not sowing your field with two kinds of seed, wear garments of cloth made of two kinds of material, no tattoos, no cutting your beard all of which are absurd enough but it gets worse - much worse:
Endorsement of chattel slavery as long as they are bought from the foreigners around Israel - and this is not indentured servitude as they are referred to as posessions that you can keep forever - Leviticus 25 44-46 (KJV)
God destroys a good family for no reason - Job 2:3 (NRSV)
God destroys the fetuses of those who do not worship him - Hosea 13:4, 9, 16 (NIV)
God approves the massacre of a peaceful people so one of his tribes could have a place to live - Judges 18:1-28 (NIV)
Babies are slaughtered and wives raped - Isaiah 13:9-16 (NIV)
The punishment for swearing at your Father or Mother is death - Exodus 21:17 (KJV)
A mixed-race couple is murdered by a godly priest to keep God's people pure - Numbers 25:6-13 (NRSV)
A daughter is burned as an acceptable sacrifice to God - Judges 11:30-39 (NIV)
The cannibalistic God makes people eat human flesh - There are nine passages in the Old Testament where God makes cannibalistic threats. Here is the worst one - Leviticus 26:27-29 (KJV)
God threatens rape, then takes credit for it - Jeremiah 13:15-26 (NRSV)
God threatens sexual molestation - Isaiah 3:16-17 (KJV)
God wants you to be happy to dash babies against the rocks - Psalm 137:8-9 (NRSV)
And before you give the weak excuse that some of these verses are from the Old Testament and Jesus "Corrected" this:
Matthew 5.17 (KJV) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
I guess I'm misinterpreting all of these verses :D
Keep looking to Jesus, leaning on Him in all things, rejoicing and resting in His hope, strength, saving love and grace 😊
Our gracious Lord bless you, strengthen you + keep you, as He SO FAITHFULLY does 😊
Every blessings + love in Jesus, our wonderful loving, living + gracious Saviour 😊
God’s word will always prevail, with or without us, be grateful that he’s using you to spread his Word. He could use rocks if he wanted to.
God’s Word is Inspired and Preserved
Many things establish that the King James Bible is the preserved Word of God for the English speaking peoples. Here’s one of those indicators.
“The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. 7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.” Psalms 12:6-7
See the fulfillment of this prophecy?
1. Tyndale Bible (1525)
2. Coverdale Bible (1535)
3. Matthews Bible (1537)
4. Great Bible (1538)
5. Geneva Bible (1560)
6. Bishop’s Bible (1568)
7. King James Bible (1611)
Read this again:
Psalms 12:6 - 12:7
6 The words of the LORD [are] pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
So that means the modern translations aren't bad.
The KJB is God preserved Word for the English speaking people.@@Justin-si5po
No, just the ones from the wrong/bad corrupt manuscripts. Most modern bibles come from the Alexandrian type text, which are only 3( this in of itself is a red flag 🚩). Then there are multiple other issues, if you are interested let me know.
Umberto Eco's word is inspired and preserved. "Foucault's Pendulum" is the book and the people who translated it into English and Spanish (the two translations I have read) were obviously divinely inspired.
Oh no, another KJV fan boy. The KJV sucks.
And the most important part of all is that they were guided by the holy spirit.
Miss Nabeel. He was a powerful Christian and a humble man.
It has definitely been changed
Why
You should definitely show me where these changes are. I am always fascinated with New Testament textual changes.
@@jdshl8423 it's called the King James version
Wrong, no changes, errors, or contradiction’s! If you think there are, list them. Then I’ll show you how they are not.
nope but I doubt you actually want to discuss
ALL four Gospels in NT (Mark, Matthew, Luke and John) -
01- Were originally written in the lingua franca Greek only - NOT in Hebrew or Aramaic.
02- Are anonymous (unknown authors).
03- Authors did not know or indicate they were writing a holy scripture.
04- Don't claim to be written by any named person.
05- Don't claim to be eye-witness accounts. (Luke 1: 2)
06- Don't claim to be inspired by the Holy Spirit. Filled with hundreds of known mistakes and contradictions.
07- Don't cross examine events/people; anything and everything is taken to be true at face value.
08- Authors don't claim to be disciples of Jesus.
09- No mention whatsoever of an author's any direct personal incident with Jesus.
10- Events are narrated in 3rd-person pronouns even when talking about namesake.
("He", "him" and "they" not "I", "me" and "we") - (Matt. 9: 9)
11- Were named/attributed to the pseudo "authors" in late 2nd century for Apostolic reasons.
12- Acts 4:13 confirms that John and Peter were uneducated commoners, not Greek educated.
(contemporarily, only 10% of urbanites could read and 3% were literate)
13- Geographic errors found in a Gospel indicate writer did not live in Palestine and was no eye-witness.
14- Synoptic Gospels are Mark, Matthew and Luke.
97% of the raw Mark is reproduced and refined in the later two.
15- Why would Matthew "the disciple and witness" copy from Mark "Peter's entourage" who was a non-witness? Is there anything more ludicrous than that?
16- Plagiarism in the Synoptics - Only 3% of Mark is unique.
76+18=94% of Mark make 56% in Matthew - verbatim as is
76+03=79% of Mark make 42% in Luke - verbatim
24% of Matthew make 23% in Luke - mostly verbatim called "double tradition"
Funny how when parts of the Bible says the same things, deniers say it is plagiarized, but when two people in the Bible slightly different things in their wording, that's a contradiction. Some people are just determined to deny the Bible no matter what.
anonymous. Can you show in history where any other names are given to the Gospel?
@@ExaltedTilemaker No, but they have entirely different accounts of the same situations where in one Jesus (pbuh) is painted as omniscient and does one thing, and in the other account he does another... which clearly contradicted the narrative that he is God. Who ever plagiarized between Mark and Matthew even copied the author's annotations.
I grew up and was raised Catholic personally. Once I got to adulthood, I began really trying to discover the truth about Christianity- with an open-heart I prayed over and over again for God to show it to me. I prayed to God to help me find the right church and a community of like-minded people I can rely on. I instead was guided to a Mosque, to Islam. There is no religion that is more practical than Islam- it has cleaned up my entire act! I would only drink here and there, but now I have been clear-minded and sober for almost a year. All praise is due to Allah.
@@joshd3502 How does that argue that they weren't originally anonymous? You are simply arguing that 100+ years later the names that were given to the gospels weren't controverted.
Rest in peace Nabil. In the arms our loving father ❤
I miss this precious young man!😢😢
God's thoughts are not our thoughts, and His ways are not our ways. Isaiah 55:8
I know for a fact that God could've heald this young man. But for reasons unknown to us, He didn't. But hears another fact, this powerful young man of God is truly in a better place. We'll get to see him again, but until then, I pray that the Great I AM will comfort his family and provide for all their needs.
How can the Bible be corrupted over time if the Bible never changes? Has it been translated a lot of times? Yes, but we still have the manuscripts they were translated from. We know what they say, and they say the same thing they always have.
We have the original manuscripts of the Bible?
Show me @@ryana1787
Even if the translations were 100% accurate - there are conflicting accounts and inconsistencies. Even in the resurresction accounts the four evangelists do not corroborate :D
Wait until he learns that before writing down th history, it was translated and passed orally.
LoL
You are claiming that there were no scribes keeping records in real time. It would seem that is an attempt to undermine the credibility of the Biblical record. However, the Kurkh Monoloith and Black Obelisk of Shalmanesser III give the Assyrian version of the same history written in the books of 1 and 2 Kings and 2 Chronicles. The Cyrus Cylinder, the Moabite Stone, the Babylonian Chronicles of Nebudchadnezzer and the Lachish reliefs all give accounts of the same events as the Bible, but from the perspective of the other parties involved. So, your claim seems imagined more than evidenced.
The NT authors put their own names on their accounts of the events, or in the letters they wrote.
He died years ago.
Oral tradition for CENTURIES. Telephone game anyone?
One inspiring witness of the enduring accuracy of the Bible through time was a traveling museum exhibit I had seen which was called Ink and Blood. They had versions of the early Bibles and even portions of the Dead Sea Scrolls showing that the texts are the same from version to version proving the integrity of the Bible has indeed been preserved. It was a marvelous exhibit with demonstrations and film documentaries. I’m not sure it is still on the road but perhaps they maintain a web site.
God preserves His word for us ..
Both Peter and John did not know Greek, so they could not have written in Greek. There were transcribers who were educated and knew Greek and would immediately make Greek translations, since this was the language at the time that was a bit more universal amongst the Roman Empire. To my understanding, Greek is a good language for theology, since it is a precise language. Much more than English, based on those who have a major in English that I have talked with.
Other people may teaches this apostles
How do you know they didn't know Greek? John is the son of Salome, who is the sister of Mary, and they all were related to Elizabeth, who's husband Zechariah the priest could write (he wrote his sons name down - Luke 1:63), so John comes from a family who all could have learned to write from Zechariah.
- and Peter and John did business together and lived in Galilee, called Galilee of the Gentiles in the Old Testament, and they both worked in the Lake of Galilee which had the Decapolis around it (Decapolis is Greek for 10 cities, and people say they spoke Greek in these cities),
- and it seems that Acts shows that back then there were many Israelite families that spoke Greek (called Helenists) in ACTS 6:1
- Hellenistic Jews vs Hebraic Jews.
- Many Israelites at the time had non-Hebrew names, probably cause they didn't speak Hebrew or Aramaic, but spoke Greek or Latin as their main language, for example the names mentioned in Colossians 4 as being in “the circumcision” (meaning Hebrews) are not Hebrew or Aramaic names: Aristarchus [Greek], and
Marcus and Justus [both Latin].
- and there is no Hebrew equivalent for the Greek names Andrew or Philip, and it is not written that the apostles named Andrew and Philip ever went by other names like with Matthew who is Levi, or Thomas who is Didymus,
- which could mean that Andrew and Philip didn't have other names to be given, but that these Greek names were their only names from birth.
- and Andrew is Peter's brother.
- And here Philip seems to understand Greek when Greeks speak to him:
- John 12:20-23 "And there were certain Greeks among them that came up to worship at the feast: 21The same came therefore to Philip, which was of Bethsaida of Galilee, and desired him, saying, Sir, we would see Jesus. 22Philip cometh and telleth Andrew: and again Andrew and Philip tell Jesus. 23And Jesus answered them, saying, The hour is come, that the Son of man should be glorified."
- And when Jesus spoke to Pilot,
or to the centurion, or to the Samaritan women, what language was he speaking?
Did these people know Aramaic?
- I think more likely Jesus was speaking their language.
- These and other reasons show it is very possible that all the apostles could have been able to speak Greek,
- and since the apostle John was family to Zechariah the priest, who could write, it's not that far fetched to think that John could also write his gospel in Greek, a language in which he could have spoken.
@@noseal543Nothing you stated is solid at all John knew Greek. In acts 4:13, both Peter and John were recognized as uneducated and untrained men who knew Jesus. The common language in Jerusalem and its immediate surrounding areas was Aramaic. They would have known Aramaic and Hebrew, but not Greek. Only the educated knew Greek in the region Peter and John were in. The people John knew would have spoken the common language in their region as well. The Colossians were too far away to be a part of Jerusalem, the region where Jesus was and Aramaic was the common language.
I have friends who know other foreign languages, this does not mean I know their foreign languages.
Actually this is false. Israel was under the occupation of both Alexander the great and the Roman empire standing over 300 years. They had mingled with many people who lived in that land for generations. So they would have learned both greek and Latin.
@@sgusjskWe know Paul was well educated. But not John and Peter, Acts 4:13.
As a nativr Hebrew speaker, this isn't true... the principle os correct, but not in the case of the bible. The New Testement has many mistranlsations and it makes me so sad. There are mamy times in which Christians have told me that The Old Testement hints at Jesus in all kinds of places, and whenever I went to check the places they were talking about I would be *SHOCKED* at how different the Enflish version is from the original Hebrew!
I'd recommend looking into Judaism, our text is exactly the way it' always been, it's the orogonal and it's not a translation :)
Jews have different rules to gentiles. Both the Hebrew and Christian holy books say that.
Jews are held to a different standard, which is why even though they don't accept the fact that Jesus IS the saviour they can still be saved. Because they were God's chosen people. But only until Jesus opened the way for us all to be saved.
I suggest you reread the old Testament and realise that God told people he was sending His son.
@@samhilton4173 Hey friend! I'd to see some examples of where Jesus is hinted at. Every example I'd been given before wasn't true, so I'd love to see if I've missed something
No your Masoretic texts came from between 7 and 9 centuries after Jesus, written by the group of Jews who rejected Jesus thus trying to hide everything that can point to Him. Judaism was started by these same group after Christianity.
@@daniellevy2272Isaia 53, id say look into the messianic prophecies as a whole. God bless
Weeeeeellll, not really, while the translation into modern Hebrew might be fully correct, it's not the same as in ancient times, Helel wasn't an evil entity in the past, it wasn't until Zoroastrianism influenced Judaism with the Zoroastrian demon king some 300 BCE that the divine prosecutor appointed by god to test humanity's faith became an evil entity.
The first temple and early to mid second temple Judaism didn't have a concept of either a satan, nor hell.
The Samaritan Judasim and other Toraic Branches still follow the old Torah, although the Samaritans still follow the unchanged Torah, while the others mostly follow the early second temple Torah
Amen, I liked that answer. :)
God bless you and keep you Nabeel.
Ok, so let's say we have a perfect translation of the bible in English. That only shows what the original text said, NOT that the text is true. God needs to be demonstrated to be real outside the bible.
That's exactly what He does. The God described in the Bible is a God that reveals Himself to man, and has ultimately done so through the person of Jesus Christ. When God revealed Himself to me back in 2005, it wasn't because I accepted some text I decided to believe in. That became real to me later. But first, God would meet me in a powerful and transformative way by the Holy Spirit. A way that was so personal, that it changed the course of my life overnight. God is a God that pursues people. Individually. He hears the honest plea (prayer) of someone who calls out to Him.
@@coll2315, exactly, just like the manual say, knock and He will open, search and you will find...
Yehovah is the God of personal relationship with each one who seek Him.
@@coll2315 I have a piece of writing (script, scripture) here that says that blue unicorns are real, can be kept as pets and can get lost (song "Mi Unicornio Azul" by Silvio Rodriguez). All this is true because the song lyrics say it is true, so it is true.
@@coll2315 That's great for you, I want that too. Why doesn't God do that for me? I believed for 40 years, loved God, prayed all the time, have a devout Christian wife and family, etc. But then I read books that gave me information I never knew. Facts about science that contravene Bible stories (e.g. evolution vs. Genesis 1, the flood, the tower of Babel) and I no longer thought the Bible was 100% correct. Why, if I sincerely ask God to do it, can't he make me believe the Bible is true?
This is just simply wrong. It is impossible to replicate the exact meaning of one language in another, since the nuances of words vary from one language to another. The new testament manuscripts (of which yes, there are thousands) differ enormously. It's often said that there are more differences in the manuscripts than there are words in the new testament. This is due to scribal errors, and the earliest scribes were the ones making the most mistakes. Most of these differences don't matter for a thing, but sometimes this significantly impacts the theological understanding of certain passages, and there are places where we just don't know what was originally written. To clarify I am not a muslim.
I do agree the original text holds more depth. However, the overall message would and it's meaning would still be the same. The word Vanakkum in my language would be translated into a means of expression of a greeting with the utmost respect. Kadavul would mean God. So I do agree some words and their depth can be lost. However, the overall underlying message for the most part can be translated.
That's because Languages Grow and Languages Die Out! The Scribes Knew exactly what were doing and didn't make any errors.
@@davidbeatus4243 This is demonstrably wrong. Scribes didn't make any errors? are you Joking?? The earliest scribes were on average far, far worse than our later scribes. They made lots more mistakes. Their manuscripts differ more significantly from later manuscripts than later manuscripts differ from one another. It's just insane to state that they didn't make any errors. I don't know how you could possibly think this. Only by the high Middle Ages were the copyists of manuscripts experts who trained to do the job and took their work very seriously. However they too made mistakes. They were human after all.
God bless ❤
Every time I see his videos I get sad. May his soul rest in God
The deception of his argument about this mom's telephone call is that the translation is immediately, in the case of the man-made bible it was centuries later.
This was a bad analogy, but the gullible bought it.
You cant remember the lessons of yur parents you were taught as a child? Let alone as an adult? Jesus' life and miracles are not only recorded from biblical sources. Either way this soujds like a heart issue, not an evidence issue. Pride comes before the fall
@@Spriktor If we did not agree with his interpretation of what his mother said, we
could interview his mother for clarification, so there could be no doubt of his
side of the conversation! TRY AND DO THAT WITH THE DRIBBLE THAT'S IN THE BIBLE??
@@Spriktor Well, what can I say, I guess fallacies are in order.
"not only recorded from biblical sources" This is Circular Argument.
And I am waiting for the other sources!!!!!
"Either way this soujds like a heart issue, not an evidence issue" This response is suitable for the gullible religious people.
@wharzenr I appreciate your kind remakes, THIS WOULD CONVINCE ME OF GOD.
Get god to move Tasmania to the coast of Queensland for a week and then put it back.
Do you think that would not convince me?
@wharzenr I believe in evolution, so that would explain how faulty the brain is
and does go a little crazy sometimes, but if you believe god made us then
you may have insulted god by saying the brain/mind cannot be trusted.
Maybe god does sloppy work, it sure looks like it! It's an ecosystem of KILL OR BE KILLED, EAT OR BE EATEN. REMEMBER GOD IS SOVEREIGN LUKE 6/46
Gods Holy Power and Love for Humainty , would never allow the Word of God ( Jesus ) to be corrupted from its origin.
Thank you for the excellent video 😊
The Lord’s love + grace be with you
Hope you are all well and resting in Jesus saving love + grace 😊
Blessings friends 😊
The Gospels Historically Reliable? th-cam.com/video/U3o5Q3ut0uQ/w-d-xo.html
Beautiful answer ❤
Be careful with decivers. Their will be many. For me I stay focus on our CREATORS 10 Commandments. And have a personal relationship with my God. 😏🙏
Which is why speaking in tongues was so important. In some ways speaking in tongues reversed the effects of the tower of babel. The kingdom of God is a kingdom for all nations of all tongues. God translated the gospel message to the nations not man. Since the first sermon at Pentecost we are still preaching the same gospel.
Well, I once saw a evangelical minister speaking in tongues. Most ridiculous performance for the most moronic audience I ever witnessed.
Amen 🙏 brother GOD bless your wonderful soul, rest in peace brother until we see you again on that long waited glorious day of his second return
David Wood is Nabeels mentor and a very good apologetic preacher
The Bible has stood the test of time. BIBLE stands for Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth.
Lol, that David was probably David Wood. That guy’s apologetics skill is insane. Recommend him to anyone looking for an adept and logical mind. Stay blessed everyone.
Yes, his friend is David Wood
ALSO WATCH: 'Give Light'
Apologist christian from Algerië! TRUTH OF THE BIBLE: briliantly so! ✝️🎯
Considering that there are 100 times more manuscripts of the than any other ancient text plus when you take those translations and simply translate them directly into English: you still have the same message AND the same 10-15 major theological doctrines that agree: we truly have a Supernaturally Inspired Love Letter from God.
Love thy neighbor is the same in all languages.
Excellent ❤
Amen!
Well done, David
No, the Bible we read from has not been corrupted!!!!!
This guy makes brave points for being a christian. He left out, that on top of all that...the authors are unknown, did not witness one second of what they write about, there is clear plagiarism from occupying cultures (Roman, Persian, Greek, etc.), not all of each author's writings are included as a committee convened to decide what to include...etc.
There is not one shred of evidence for the existence of jesus. He wrote not one word down, and even each author's accounts are inherently contradictory, then between authors even more contradictory.
Faith (the willingness to believe something on zero evidence) is just amazing.
AMEN ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Amen
Their is only one message that we can get from different translation.. the salvation. The God who died for me.. the king who suffered for my sins and if i believe and obey, i will follow Him. He obeyed His commandments 100% for me. hallelujah..
This one was a perfect introduction for logical fallacies
According to Jesus, rich men will have trouble getting into the Kingdom.
Yet there are many rich men in the UK !
(Matthew 19:23)
Raymond E. Brown, recognized as one of the world's leading New Testament scholars, professor emeritus of biblical studies in New York, recipient of more than 30 awards from Catholic and Protestant universities worldwide, president of several societies for biblical studies in the United States and Europe, called by two popes to serve on the Pontifical Biblical Commission, states in his book "What do we know about the New Testament?", page 43, the following:
"None of the gospels mentions an author by name, and it is quite possible that none was written by the person whose name it bears, according to a tradition dating from the end of the 2nd century (which implies that the 4 gospels had no title for almost 2 centuries).
He also tells us on page 57: "Almost two thousand years ago, the evangelists wrote four gospels in Greek, we don't have the original manuscripts from the pen of the evangelists, nor indeed any original of any book of the New Testament, what we have are many handwritten copies in Greek made over some one thousand four hundred years, between 150 and the invention of printing, often, but usually on points of detail, these copies differ from one another due to mistakes or changes by copyists",
On page 58, he goes on to say: "The Gospel sources must be of particular concern to us, because in all likelihood the evangelists were not eyewitnesses to the life of Jesus".
On page 91: "The Catholic Church has decided on canonicity on the basis of long and regular practice in the liturgy, not on the conclusions of scholars about who wrote or copied this or that".
These "original texts" don't exist. What do exist are the transcriptions that appeared between the 4th and 10th centuries. And these are transcriptions of transcriptions.
I like that answer-- best way to tell non-believers about it.. but then-- "the FOOL has said in his heart there is no God"...
Enjoy the video💙
Nice rationalization.
He's correct. Translating what you said to your mother from one language to another is just as accurate as translating the Bible (a collection of literal and metaphoric stories and allegories) through a million languages, some of which are dead, across milennia.
Let me make this even easier for you: Does God make mistakes?
Not if he doesn't exist.
Even if God is real, men still wrote the bible. Yes, men make mistakes.
@@spacemoose4726 no, the Bible is the Word of God. It was written by the Holy Spirit through the hands of men. God makes no mistakes, and is omnipotent. That means He has all power and control. Be free, my brother.
I miss this guy..
The odd argument they make is that the message would change over time. If you do critical thinking you'd have to ask what is more likely... That key events would be changed or small grammatical errors? Would there be errors of man or errors of God moving from manuscript to manuscript?
I'd argue the small grammar changes, but you'd still get the main message across. Do you think making a new copy they'd actually change the crucifixion? Or maybe details around it and still capture the crucifixion?
Same like "I am who I am" which is an incorrect translation which fooled everyone including me. It's "I shall be with you" or something like that. I got that from an actual person who understands hebrew that made a video somewhere on youtube that I forgot
Dead Sea Scrolls are the end of this argument (and other scrolls since that time)
The first and most Accurate English Translation is the Douay Rheims Bible.
With Revised Translations there are to many unavoidable Ambiguities which allows a different understanding. In fact check out Matthew Chapter 17 verse 21. It is missing. But in the Douay Rheims it is not missing.
If that verse is missing in your Bible, what else is missing?
I looked at that verse and looked at why it wasn't included in later translations - it's because it wasn't present in the most reliable translations that we have. But each translation (including the ones after the version you mentioned) would mention that change though. That's why we know our Bible hasn't been corrupted. Even the most minor change is detectable just like how you were able to find even a verse that wasn't included in other translations because we have thousands of copies of the originals and the translations. If anything, that makes the Bible more reliable.
They've counted those kinds of logical inaccuracies. And out of the entire Bible, one of the largest collections of text ever assembled in a single volume. The number of errors is small enough to fit on a single page... There's not much missing..
@@momzwrite There are too many conflicting accounts and inconsistencies to consider it accurate and reliable. Even in the resurresction accounts the four evangelists do not corroborate :D
@@stuartdavidson162Wrong. There are zero conflicting accounts in the NT. For some reason, you refuse to acknowledge that the Gospel is cumulative.
If you ask 4 different people what happened at an event, they'll tell you what they recall from it. Even if their recollections are different, it doesn't mean they are false.
If all 4 had a conversation with one person at the same time, they might all remember different parts of the conversation, but all parts happened.
There are no conflicts in the Bible.
@@themonsterunderyourbed9408 You start on a solid foundation that the NT has zero conflicting accounts but then seen to have a shaky moment stating "If you ask 4 different people what happened at an event, they'll tell you what they recall from it". Which is it? I'll tell you - it's the latter and the accounts are so different it's laughable:
Matthew 28 (King James Version)
1 In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre.
2 And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it.
Mark 16 (King James Version)
4 And when they looked, they saw that the stone was rolled away: for it was very great.
5 And entering into the sepulchre, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment; and they were affrighted.
Luke 24 (King James Version)
1 Now upon the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came unto the sepulchre, bringing the spices which they had prepared, and certain others with them.
2 And they found the stone rolled away from the sepulchre.
3 And they entered in, and found not the body of the Lord Jesus.
4 And it came to pass, as they were much perplexed thereabout, behold, two men stood by them in shining garments:
John 20 (King James Version)
11 But Mary stood without at the sepulchre weeping: and as she wept, she stooped down, and looked into the sepulchre,
12 And seeth two angels in white sitting, the one at the head, and the other at the feet, where the body of Jesus had lain.
13 And they say unto her, Woman, why weepest thou? She saith unto them, Because they have taken away my Lord, and I know not where they have laid him.
14 And when she had thus said, she turned herself back, and saw Jesus standing, and knew not that it was Jesus.
15 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, why weepest thou? whom seekest thou? She, supposing him to be the gardener, saith unto him, Sir, if thou have borne him hence, tell me where thou hast laid him, and I will take him away.
Earthquake or no earthquake? Surely this would've been noteworthy for all the accounts!
Angels/No angels/A man/Two men/Tomb empty?
Stone aleady rolled away or in place?
This is arguably the main story of the New Testament and the accounts of the Evangelists don't agree. If these wrks are meant to be come from divine inspiration you'd think they would be 100% accurate.
This is just the Evangelical accounts of the resurrection - many more inconsistencies/errors are in The Bible but let's just stick to this for now - Let's not wander off topic :D
Orthodox Christian’s got a legacy of the holy fathers what was guided by the Holy Spirit, even if heresy many times try to corrupt us - we all times fight back and give our lives in line for that’s.
God’s church will never be touched by the gates of hell.
Enemy can take your body but never our soul if we stay true with Christ.
“ go on “ -me forever
🤣🤣🤣