this is great and very helpful! thank you for sharing! we are exploring it both by watching your videos and reading articles. we found that most articles do this way: after filtering in database and scanning the abstracts, they have a certain amount of articles deemed to be in the research scope, and use bibliometric tools to do the analysis. first, they have the biblimetric results such as top articles, top journals, top authors.......then they will decide how many and which articles to be further examined for systematic/content analysis through network mapping(co-citation, coupling, co-words....). all of them will use the citation numbers as a selection criteria . for example, they may choose articles with more than 50 LCS. we are guessing there is a limitation with this criteria: most recent articles won't have high amount of citations and would be excluded. but in many situation we want to know the recent research trends or current hot topics(including forming the frameworks). how can we overcome this?
Well, to be honest you helped me a lot with my thesis. Thank you so much for the effort. I have watched all the Bibliometrix (x) series a couple of times so far. In my humble opinion, it would have helped more if you had done it with an example. But still.... Wow... Especially for people like myself who has no idea about this method. Thank you so much, I couldn't have appreciated it more...
@@RESEARCHHUB Wow! I wasn't expecting this fast of an answer, thanks for that as well. What I meant is selecting a topic, collecting a data on the topic and analysing it (it doesn't have to be perfect) while explaining. It can be even about a bunch of parsley. Who was the most influential author studying on parsley? How can we go through our data on VosViewer for example to come across with "Jason the author" as the best of parsley studies in the selected data. So, instead of going with the descriptions, you can show it and let the description stand out for itself. I know it is a lot to ask for but please know that it is from a misarable person from social sciences :-D Even though you can't do it, it is so nice of you to answer. I really appreciate it.
Learning a lot from your videos, they are super insightful. One question, for my field I am finding a lot of articles from organizations like World Economic Forum, IMF, McKinsey. These do not occur in SCOPUS but would be relevant for bibliometric analysis. How do I go about including them?
Thanks, articles from those organizations cannot be used in bibliometrics review. If your interest involves a lot of those, I recommend scoping review.
thank you for all the wonderful videos! can I ask how long the entire bibliometric analysis process took? Like for a systematic review it is typically a good year of work, how long for bibliometric analysis?
I have done alle the steps thanks to your help. Now I encounter a problem that need an experienced eye and pleaase answer me : the 3 clusters obtained contain the same subjects ( example: how to control speed of runner). what that means ? what impretation do I have to give?
Is it possible to do bibliometrics analysis when the number of published articles with the exact same keywords are less? For example “Hotel Booking Intention”
we have 3 cooperators each will share the screening of the search result (after search and filtering, to read the abstract and delete those irrelevant ones). how do we distribute/allocate the job? we use WOS. we found it is hard to get exactly same search results among the 3 (we are in different country, different institutes) and we want to be in exactly the same paper. thank you in advance
One idea could be using the same university library through VPN. Or, one with the highest articles can extract bibliography data in excel and share with others. But save the search by logging into the database. After filtering suing the excel, go back to the saved search and extract bibliography data of only the filtered studies. Munim.
@@RESEARCHHUB many thanks! we are trying to do the screening in the text files. though a bit slow but better than messing up the research result in more than one time. every time with the same keywords and filter, the result can be different.
How many nodes shall we choose to perform co-citation analysis in the biblioshiny app? Is there any highest cap? Is there any strategy that you can share? Thank you.
Somewhere between 50 to 100 is good. If you have too many nodes, the figure can be messy and also at some point adding more nodes do not reveal anything new (diminishing marginal effect).
this is great and very helpful! thank you for sharing! we are exploring it both by watching your videos and reading articles. we found that most articles do this way: after filtering in database and scanning the abstracts, they have a certain amount of articles deemed to be in the research scope, and use bibliometric tools to do the analysis. first, they have the biblimetric results such as top articles, top journals, top authors.......then they will decide how many and which articles to be further examined for systematic/content analysis through network mapping(co-citation, coupling, co-words....). all of them will use the citation numbers as a selection criteria . for example, they may choose articles with more than 50 LCS. we are guessing there is a limitation with this criteria: most recent articles won't have high amount of citations and would be excluded. but in many situation we want to know the recent research trends or current hot topics(including forming the frameworks). how can we overcome this?
Appreciate the effort. Thanks a lot:)
Well, to be honest you helped me a lot with my thesis. Thank you so much for the effort. I have watched all the Bibliometrix (x) series a couple of times so far. In my humble opinion, it would have helped more if you had done it with an example. But still.... Wow... Especially for people like myself who has no idea about this method. Thank you so much, I couldn't have appreciated it more...
Thank you, glad to hear that. Can you explain what do you mean by if it was done with example so that we can take this into account in future videos.
@@RESEARCHHUB Wow! I wasn't expecting this fast of an answer, thanks for that as well. What I meant is selecting a topic, collecting a data on the topic and analysing it (it doesn't have to be perfect) while explaining. It can be even about a bunch of parsley. Who was the most influential author studying on parsley? How can we go through our data on VosViewer for example to come across with "Jason the author" as the best of parsley studies in the selected data. So, instead of going with the descriptions, you can show it and let the description stand out for itself. I know it is a lot to ask for but please know that it is from a misarable person from social sciences :-D Even though you can't do it, it is so nice of you to answer. I really appreciate it.
@@mervealper4022 Thank you for the feedback. Will make one such video in near future.
Research HUB Oh, really? Thank you so much 😇 I couldn't be happier for myself and other novice people like me. Good luck 🍀
Extremely useful video...Thank you so much resource persons for their valuable time n effort...Looking for more videos
very good video. Highly specialized information. Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Excellent video. Lots of key insights from both of you. Can you please tell how to perform page rank analysis using Gephi. Thanks
Thanks. please see th-cam.com/video/HvHBoArhFjE/w-d-xo.html
Thanks for sharing your experience!
Thank you very much for this serie of videos, it's really helpful ! thanks again
Thank you. please share the playlist with your colleagues.
Learning a lot from your videos, they are super insightful. One question, for my field I am finding a lot of articles from organizations like World Economic Forum, IMF, McKinsey. These do not occur in SCOPUS but would be relevant for bibliometric analysis. How do I go about including them?
Thanks, articles from those organizations cannot be used in bibliometrics review. If your interest involves a lot of those, I recommend scoping review.
@@RESEARCHHUB Thank you, this is useful input and I'll definitely pursue it.
thank you for all the wonderful videos! can I ask how long the entire bibliometric analysis process took? Like for a systematic review it is typically a good year of work, how long for bibliometric analysis?
You can write one decent bibliometric review in 1 month of full time work
I have done alle the steps thanks to your help. Now I encounter a problem that need an experienced eye and pleaase answer me : the 3 clusters obtained contain the same subjects ( example: how to control speed of runner). what that means ? what impretation do I have to give?
I'd appreciate it if you do the same with meta analysis.. Thank you guys 😊😍
Thank you. We will do soon.
Is it possible to do bibliometrics analysis when the number of published articles with the exact same keywords are less? For example “Hotel Booking Intention”
we have 3 cooperators each will share the screening of the search result (after search and filtering, to read the abstract and delete those irrelevant ones). how do we distribute/allocate the job? we use WOS. we found it is hard to get exactly same search results among the 3 (we are in different country, different institutes) and we want to be in exactly the same paper. thank you in advance
One idea could be using the same university library through VPN. Or, one with the highest articles can extract bibliography data in excel and share with others. But save the search by logging into the database. After filtering suing the excel, go back to the saved search and extract bibliography data of only the filtered studies. Munim.
@@RESEARCHHUB many thanks! we are trying to do the screening in the text files. though a bit slow but better than messing up the research result in more than one time. every time with the same keywords and filter, the result can be different.
How many nodes shall we choose to perform co-citation analysis in the biblioshiny app? Is there any highest cap? Is there any strategy that you can share?
Thank you.
Somewhere between 50 to 100 is good. If you have too many nodes, the figure can be messy and also at some point adding more nodes do not reveal anything new (diminishing marginal effect).
@@RESEARCHHUB Thank you!
Thank you for the Video playlist.! too many hand gestures and much overstepping though !
Can we analyze more than 50 papers from WoS plain text format?
How can we perform PageRank in biblioshiny software?
To the best of our knowledge, not yet possible with biblioshiny. YOu can try gephi
@@RESEARCHHUB Thank you for the prompt reply!
can we get an email id to connect with Mr Dhanvant Reddy pls?